Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 23;9(5):e15721. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15721

Table 6.

Analysis of variance for the experimental results of the Box-Behinken design matrix for JFB yield.

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value remarks
Model 9 23.9034 2.6559 39.96 0.000 Highly significant
Linear 3 1.3910 0.4637 6.98 0.031 Significant
Methanol 1 0.9853 0.9853 14.82 0.012 Highly significant
NaOH 1 0.0263 0.0263 0.40 0.557 Not significant
Temperature (°C) 1 0.4050 0.4050 6.09 0.057 Not significant
Square 3 10.6944 3.5648 53.63 0.000 Highlysignificant
Methanol × Methanol 1 8.7170 8.7170 131.15 0.000 Highly significant
NaOH × NaOH 1 3.8555 3.8555 58.01 0.001 Highly significant
Temperature (°C) × Temperature (°C) 1 0.0937 0.0937 1.41 0.288 Not significant
2-Way Interaction 3 12.0229 4.0076 60.30 0.000 Highly significant
Methanol × NaOH 1 11.0760 11.0760 166.64 0.000 Highly significant
Methanol × Temperature (°C) 1 0.0156 0.0156 0.24 0.648 Not significant
NaOH × Temperature (°C) 1 0.9312 0.9312 14.01 0.013 Highly significant
Error 5 0.3323 0.0665
Lack-of-Fit 3 0.3323 0.1108 * *
Pure Error 2 0.0000 0.0000
Total 14 24.2358

Regression analysis was undertaken for fitting the response function and predicting the biodiesel yield was obtained in eq. (3).