Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
letter
. 2023 Jun 1;110(6):1017. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.05.004

Response to Grosse et al.

Stephen F Kingsmore 1,2,3,, Laurie D Smith 1, Chris M Kunard 4, Matthew Bainbridge 1,2, Sergey Batalov 1,2, Wendy Benson 1,2, Eric Blincow 1,2, Sara Caylor 1,2, Christina Chambers 6, Guillermo Del Angel 5, David P Dimmock 1,2, Yan Ding 1,2, Katarzyna Ellsworth 1,2, Annette Feigenbaum 1,2,6, Erwin Frise 7, Robert C Green 8, Lucia Guidugli 1,2, Kevin P Hall 4, Christian Hansen 1,2, Charlotte A Hobbs 1,2, Scott D Kahn 11, Mark Kiel 9, Lucita Van Der Kraan 1,2, Chad Krilow 10, Yong H Kwon 1,2, Lakshminarasimha Madhavrao 1,2, Jennie Le 1,2, Sebastien Lefebvre 5, Rebecca Mardach 1,2,6, William R Mowrey 5, Danny Oh 1,2, Mallory J Owen 1,2,6, George Powley 10, Gunter Scharer 1, Seth Shelnutt 10, Mari Tokita 1,2, Shyamal S Mehtalia 4, Albert Oriol 1,2, Stavros Papadopoulos 10, James Perry 2,6, Edwin Rosales 1,2, Erica Sanford 1, Steve Schwartz 9, Duke Tran 4, Martin G Reese 7, Meredith Wright 1,2, Narayanan Veeraraghavan 1,2, Kristen Wigby 1,2,6, Mary J Willis 1, Aaron R Wolen 10, Thomas Defay 5
PMCID: PMC10256999  PMID: 37267897

To the Editor: We thank Dr. Grosse and colleagues for two corrections to the introduction of our recent description of a genome-sequencing system for universal newborn screening (NBS), diagnosis, and precision medicine for severe childhood genetic diseases that currently have effective therapeutic interventions.1 Firstly, that between 2006 and 2022, the number of core disorders recommended for NBS of dried blood spots (DBSs) in the United States—the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP)—increased by six and not eight, as we had stated. Secondly, that between 2006 and 2018 the estimated number of infants with RUSP core conditions detected in the US by NBS of DBS increased by 207 per annum and not by 27, as we had stated.

Irrespective of the absolute increment, the expansion of NBS “one disease at a time” historically has failed to keep pace with the introduction of new, effective therapeutic interventions.2,3 More than 700 childhood genetic diseases currently have effective therapeutic interventions.4 The growing number of investigational new drug applications for novel gene-based therapeutics suggests that the gap between screened disorders and those that meet the principles for NBS will widen rapidly in the future.5 Despite the expansion of conventional NBS and the growing availability of rapid diagnostic genomic sequencing, genetic diseases remain a leading cause of avoidable infant mortality in the US.6 Population genome sequencing has the potential for transformative change in the way we screen, diagnose, and treat genetic diseases. Globally there are now at least 15 projects evaluating genomic NBS, and there is an aggregate planned enrollment of more than half a million infants (https://www.iconseq.org/the-consortium). We agree with Dr. Grosse and colleagues that it is now important to explore ways in which conventional and genomic NBS complement each other to close the gap in timely and equitable screening, diagnosis, and precision medicine for infants with hundreds of genetic diseases.

References

  • 1.Kingsmore S.F., Smith L.D., Kunard C.M., Bainbridge M., Batalov S., Benson W., Blincow E., Caylor S., Chambers C., Del Angel G., et al. A genome sequencing system for universal newborn screening, diagnosis, and precision medicine for severe genetic diseases. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2022;109:1605–1619. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kingsmore S.F., BeginNGS Consortium Rapid newborn genome sequencing to end the diagnostic and therapeutic odyssey. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2022;190:243–256. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.32005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Singh S., Ojodu J., Kemper A.R., Lam W.K.K., Grosse S.D. Implementation of Newborn Screening for Conditions in the United States First Recommended during 2010-2018. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2023;9:20. doi: 10.3390/ijns9020020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bick D., Bick S.L., Dimmock D.P., Fowler T.A., Caulfield M.J., Scott R.H. An online compendium of treatable genetic disorders. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2021;187:48–54. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yu T.W., Kingsmore S.F., Green R.C., MacKenzie T., Wasserstein M., Caggana M., Gold N.B., Kennedy A., Kishnani P.S., Might M., et al. Are we prepared to deliver gene-targeted therapies for rare diseases? Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2023;193:7–12. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.32029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Owen M.J., Wright M.S., Batalov S., Kwon Y., Ding Y., Chau K.K., Chowdhury S., Sweeney N.M., Kiernan E., Richardson A., et al. Reclassification of the Etiology of Infant Mortality With Whole-Genome Sequencing. JAMA Netw. Open. 2023;6 doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES