Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Parasitol. 2022 Dec 19;53(8):405–409. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2022.10.005

The turkey ascarid, Ascaridia dissimilis, as a model genetic system

JB Collins a, Erik C Andersen a,*
PMCID: PMC10258144  NIHMSID: NIHMS1859354  PMID: 36549442

Abstract

Parasitic nematodes cause significant effects on humans each year, with the most prevalent being Ascaris lumbricoides. Benzimidazoles (BZ) are the most widely used anthelmintic drug in humans, and although the biology of resistance to this drug class is understood in some species, resistance is poorly characterized in ascarids. Models such as Caenorhabditis elegans were essential in developing our current understanding of BZ resistance, but more closely related model nematodes are needed to understand resistance in ascarids. Here, we propose a new ascarid model species that infects turkeys, Ascaridia dissimilis, to develop a better understanding of BZ resistance.

Keywords: Ascarid, Model organism, Benzimidazole, Anthelmintic resistance

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1859354-f0001.jpg


Parasitic nematodes cause significant deleterious effects to humans and livestock worldwide. In humans, an estimated 1.3 billion people are infected by at least one soil-transmitted helminth (STH) species, including hookworms, whipworms, and ascarids (Hotez et al., 2020). Among these STH species, ascarids are the most pervasive, with estimates as high as 1.2 billion people infected (Hotez et al., 2020). Ascarids cause the loss of 749,000 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per year (The World Health Organization, https://www.who.int/data/global-health-estimates) or approximately 40% of all DALYs caused by STHs. Ascaris lumbricoides, the primary ascarid of humans, follows a fecal-oral transmission route. After hatching in the intestine, larvae undergo hepato-tracheal migration, moving through the liver and lungs before making their way back to the small intestine. During their migration through the lungs, A. lumbricoides can cause verminous pneumonia, where inflammation and fluid accumulate, often causing significant respiratory distress (Spener et al., 2019). Infections (ascariasis) with adult parasites in the small intestine can cause stunted growth, malabsorption of nutrients, diarrhea, and intestinal blockage in humans that can be fatal if left untreated. Control of ascariasis in endemic regions is typically dependent on Mass Drug Administration (MDA) programs that deliver regular anthelmintic treatments to at-risk populations. The benzimidazole (BZ) class of anthelmintics is the treatment of choice for ascarids because of their ease of delivery and low costs. Historical efficacy of BZs, such as albendazole, against ascariasis has been high, with a typical cure rate of over 90% (Vercruysse et al., 2011). Despite this historically high efficacy, the development of resistance is of great concern.

Resistance to the BZ class is common in many veterinary parasites and has reached near ubiquity in species such as Haemonchus contortus, a strongylid parasite of small ruminants (Howell et al., 2008). Anthelmintic treatment is widespread in veterinary medicine, similar to MDA programs in humans, applying significant selection pressure on STH populations. Because veterinary parasite populations are large, they harbor high levels of genetic variation, creating ideal conditions to rapidly select for resistance and widespread failure of treatments (Silvestre et al., 2001). The mechanisms of action must be understood to properly study how resistance develops in natural populations.

In the 1970s, BZs were found to disrupt mitosis in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans (Davidse, 1973). It is thought that, in susceptible parasite populations, BZs disrupt the polymerization of microtubules, preventing normal development. Further research showed that, in nematodes such as Caenorhabditis elegans and H. contortus, sensitivity to BZs is mediated by beta-tubulin genes (Driscoll et al., 1989) and that mutations in these genes at codons 167, 198 and 200 were correlated with resistance (Kwa et al., 1994a; Hodgkinson et al., 2008). Since this discovery, the study of BZ resistance has been focused on these codons, but differences among divergent nematode species mean that these same mutations might not play a role in BZ resistance in all nematode species (Roose et al., 2021).

Nematodes are divided into five clades (Blaxter and Koutsovoulos, 2015). Although BZ resistance is common in Clade V nematodes (e.g., C. elegans and H. contortus), reports of resistance in Clade III nematodes (e.g., ascarids) are more sporadic. Resistance has never been confirmed in Ascaris spp., but reduced efficacy has been observed (Krücken et al., 2017). A study of albendazole efficacy in Rwandan school children found reduced efficacy against A. lumbricoides. The authors looked across the beta-tubulin gene family but found no mutations at codons 167, 198, or 200, leading to suggestions that beta-tubulin genes and these codons might not be mediators of resistance (Krücken et al., 2017). Evidence of resistance has also been found in multiple veterinary ascarids (Table 1). A study of Ascaridia dissimilis in turkeys shows significantly reduced efficacy in a parasite population isolated from a commercial farm, and further studies confirmed anthelmintic resistance in this isolate (Collins et al., 2019). Multiple studies of horse ascarid species (e.g., Parascaris spp.) have also shown definitive evidence of BZ resistance (Martin et al., 2021; Özben et al., 2022). However, it is important to note that the beta-tubulin mutations associated with BZ resistance have not been found in any of these species, suggesting that resistance mechanisms in ascarids might differ from Clade V nematodes. The sole focus on the codon 167, 198, or 200 beta-tubulin mutations has likely contributed to the failure to diagnose resistance in ascarids.

Table 1.

Studies that have documented reduced efficacy or confirmed resistance to benzimidazoles in ascarid parasites.

Host Species Ascarid Species Drug Used Study
Turkey Ascaridia dissimilis Fenbendazole Yazwinski et al., 2012
Human Ascaris lumbricoides Albendazole Krucken et al., 2017
Turkey Ascaridia dissimilis Fenbendazole Collins et al., 2019
Horse Parascaris univalens Fenbendazole Martin et al., 2021
Chicken Heterakis gallinarum Fenbendazole Collins et al., 2022

Long used as a model for all Clade V nematodes, C. elegans has informed much of what we know about the mechanisms of anthelmintic resistance (Enos and Coles, 1990). A cycle of discovery between C. elegans and H. contortus has provided important systems for anthelmintic discovery and anthelmintic resistance research (Wit et al., 2021), but these findings might not be applicable to all other nematode clades as shown by the apparent lack of beta-tubulin mutations in resistant ascarid species. Caenorhabditis elegans is a free-living nematode and is a highly scalable laboratory model. Clade III parasites, such as ascarids, have fundamental differences in life cycles when compared with Clade V nematodes, so a more closely related species should be used as a model system to perform experiments in this clade. Historically, Ascaris suum, a swine ascarid and close relative of A. lumbricoides, has been the de facto model for ascarid research. Ascaris suum is also zoonotic, infecting humans, and is nearly genetically identical to A. lumbricoides, providing much debate if the two species are in fact the same (Leles et al., 2012). Swine are physiologically similar to humans, making them an important model for translational research. Biological compatibility of hosts and parasites makes A. suum in swine a useful system for studying the effects of ascariasis on the host and the effectiveness of treatments.

Although A. suum and swine are good models for translational research for humans, many caveats limit their usefulness for genetic studies and drug development. Models must be readily scalable, not cost-prohibitive, and easily manipulated. Swine are among the more expensive research hosts, making large-scale studies needed for genetics cost-prohibitive. Because of their large size and rapid growth, manipulation of the model is difficult, impacting the ability to execute controlled high-throughput studies. As demonstrated by discoveries made using C. elegans, a scalable and cost-effective model is necessary for quantitative and molecular genetics, and the ability of A. suum to be used in such studies is limited. A variety of other host species are available for use as a model for ascarid research such as dogs and horses, but these models are also cost-prohibitive and have their own problems with the perception of research on companion animals. Here, we propose a new ascarid model, using BZ-resistant ascarids of poultry (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Comparison of Ascaris suum and Ascaridia dissimilis as a model ascarid.

Currently, resistance has been found in two closely related (Fig. 2A) species of ascarids in poultry: Ascaridia dissimilis, a turkey ascarid (Collins et al., 2019), and Heterakis gallinarum (Collins et al., 2022), a cecal ascarid of gallinaceous birds. Secondary infection caused by Histomonas meleagridis harbored by H. gallinarum reduces its usefulness as a model (Daş et al., 2021), making A. dissimilis a better choice. Ascaridia dissimilis has an atypical ascarid life cycle (Fig. 2B) without the need for hepato-tracheal migration found in other ascarids, although hepato-tracheal migration has been observed in rare cases (Ackert, 1931). Ascaridia dissimilis infects the host by the consumption of fully developed embryos from the environment. Third-stage larvae hatch in the crop and proventriculus, and are then carried to the small intestine where they complete their development (Pankavich et al., 1974). The development from initial infection to sexually mature adults typically takes 31 – 35 days (Pankavich et al., 1974). After maturity, adult females are 8 – 10 cm in length and produce approximately 2,000 embryos per day (Permin et al., 1997). Depending on environmental conditions, embryos will take 2 – 3 weeks to develop to the infective stage and can persist for years in the environment until consumed by the host. Typically, infections with A. dissimilis are asymptomatic but can cause lethargy, intestinal distension, and intestinal blockage in severe cases. Biological similarity to other ascarids and the lack of significant pathology in infections make this ascarid a useful parasite model.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Phylogenetic relationship and life-cycle of Ascaridia dissimilis. (A) Relationship of selected parasitic and free-living helminths. Sequences of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region from multiple ascarid species and the Clade V nematodes were used to generate a phylogenetic tree. The A. dissimilis sequence was sourced from unpublished data and all other sequence data are available from GenBank (KR872308, JN636101, MF358962, AJ007452, MF358961, LC592776). (B) Life cycle of A. dissimilis. Infective stage embryos are consumed by the host and hatch within the crop and proventriculus. Larvae are carried to the small intestine and develop to the adult stage 31 – 35 days after ingestion. After mating, adult females produce embryos that are excreted into the environment. Embryos develop to the infective stage in 3 – 4 weeks.

BZ resistance in A. dissimilis was first suspected in a 2013 farm study (Yazwinski et al., 2013) and more recently has been documented in a controlled efficacy study (Collins et al., 2019). Briefly, four isolates of A. dissimilis were collected from commercial turkey farms, three with suspected resistance and one from an organic farm, although benzimidazoles were used previously on that farm. Birds were infected with one of four isolates, and 28 days p.i., half of the birds were treated with fenbendazole for 5 days. One week after treatment, birds underwent necropsy and parasites were recovered. Fenbendazole was found to be >99% effective against three isolates but only 63.7% efficacious against the isolate from the organic farm. These findings are, to our knowledge, the first documentation of BZ resistance in a controlled laboratory ascarid study and were validated further in subsequent studies using this isolate (Collins et al., 2021). With confirmed resistant isolates, A. dissimilis represents a highly tractable ascarid model for studying the genes that mediate anthelmintic resistance in Clade III nematodes.

Animal costs for studies of A. dissimilis are 5 – 10% of the cost of the current ascarid model in swine. Turkeys are less than 10% of the size of swine, greatly improving handling as well as reducing the amount of space needed. An adult pig needs over four square meters of space, but an adult turkey needs a sixth of that space, greatly increasing the replication that can be done in the same space. Ease of handling and the potential for greatly increased replication make turkeys a higher throughput host to study ascarid biology and genetics compared with swine hosts.

Ascaridia dissimilis provides many improvements over A. suum, but limitations impact its overall usefulness. Swine will be the gold standard with respect to host immune responses because of the similarity to human hosts. Additionally, A. suum, similar to A. lumbricoides in humans, undergoes obligatory hepato-tracheal migration, unlike ascarids in poultry, making it possible to study the hepatic and respiratory effects of infection. Studies of host physiology or parasite migration will likely always depend on a swine parasite model. The lack of mutations at codons 167,198, and 200 of beta-tubulin in BZ-resistant ascarids highlights the need for a genetic model of resistance in these species. Further work in a tractable model ascarid, such as A. dissimilis, is imperative to understand the genetics of resistance to other anthelmintic classes as well. Resistance in ascarids, as an emerging problem, is poorly understood, and A. dissimilis provides a cost-effective and scalable means of building the in vivo, in vitro, and molecular toolkits found in other important nematode parasite species.

Genetic research has improved our understanding of mechanisms involved in anthelmintic resistance. Bulk-segregant genetic mapping has been used in H. contortus, made by crossing resistant and susceptible populations, to discover putative resistance genes (Doyle et al., 2019; Doyle and Cotton, 2019). Males from a susceptible and females from a resistant population were transplanted into a naive animal, and then underwent multiple generations of backcrossing to the susceptible population while maintaining anthelmintic selective pressure every other generation. The progeny from multiple generations of anthelmintic selection maintained resistance alleles and linked loci in an otherwise susceptible genetic background. These animals were subjected to whole-genome sequencing and those sequences were compared with the susceptible parent’s genetic background. Variants that were statistically enriched in the resistant population compared with the susceptible parent background were then identified and candidate resistance genes were proposed (Doyle et al., 2019, 2022; Laing et al., 2022). No genetic crossing system has been established for an ascarid species. Tractable ascarid models with established resistant isolates are necessary to replicate the successes of the H. contortus model. Ascaridia dissimilis is a good candidate for this system because resistant isolates are already known. This species is relatively quick to grow and easy to collect for genetic crosses. The lack of pathology in low-level infections is also ideal, as it removes potential confounding effects in transplantation attempts. Non-surgical means of transplantation of parasites in poultry have previously been explored (Permin et al., 2003), and even with low rates of success, the scalability of the poultry model makes this technique a more cost- and resource-efficient option than surgical means in a less scalable model such as swine. Beyond an efficient and cost-effective means of performing genetic crosses, a high-quality genome is essential for genetic mapping. Refinement of the H. contortus genome was critical for genetic mapping. Current ascarid genomes lack the quality needed to replicate this success. However, work is ongoing to create a high-quality A. dissimilis genome. Once these resources are generated, A. dissimilis can be used as a genetic model for ascarids, including investigating the genetics of BZ resistance in ascarids. A poultry ascarid model could provide many improvements over the swine model, but other potential model systems should also be considered.

Rodent models have long been used in a wide range of biological studies, and the genetics and biology of the various populations of rodents are well understood. Heterakis spumosa, an ascarid of rodents, lives in the upper colon of infected hosts but is not known to cause pathology. Similar to other Heterakis spp., adults are approximately 1 cm in length. Unlike Heterakis gallinarum, Heterakis spumosa is not a known vector of any pathogens. Laboratory model systems using a well understood and easily manipulated host could make rodents a powerful ascarid model for anthelmintic resistance studies if drug-resistant isolates of H. spumosa can be identified. Although costs might exceed the poultry model, the ease of handling and well understood host genetics makes rodents a possible ascarid model as well.

The emergence of drug resistance in multiple species of ascarids and evidence of reduced efficacy in ascarid infections of humans highlights the immediate need for scalable models for ascarids. Research on resistance in Clade V nematodes has been dependent on C. elegans as a highly tractable model, but evidence indicates that it is less translatable to Clade III nematodes such as ascarids. Although a great model for human physiology, the classic swine model is cost-prohibitive for drug development and genetic studies of anthelmintic resistance. Thus, a more affordable and tractable model is needed. With resistant isolates already established in a laboratory setting, A. dissimilis infections of turkeys offer a powerful model to pursue. Inexpensive hosts that are relatively easy to handle enable a wide range of higher throughput studies to better understand ascarid biology, the genetics of resistance in ascarids, and the discovery and development of new anthelmintics. As research funding becomes tighter, the need for inexpensive models with quality genetic resources will continue to increase. The poultry ascarid models represent a powerful system for inexpensive, large-scale studies, especially as anthelmintic resistance in these species continues to emerge.

Highlights.

  • Benzimidazole resistance is an emerging problem in ascarids.

  • Swine ascarid models are expensive, and poultry offers a more tractable alternative.

  • Resistant isolates are established for use in the poultry model.

  • Studies using ascarids of poultry as a model will provide insights into the biology of resistance in ascarids.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Amanda Shaver and Izzy Miller for editing and suggestions in the preparation of this manuscript. Figures were produced using BioRender.com. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Grant Number R01AI153088 awarded to E.C.A.).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Ackert JE, 1931. The Morphology and Life History of the Fowl Nematode Ascaridia lineata (Schneider). Parasitology 23, 360–379. [Google Scholar]
  2. Blaxter M, Koutsovoulos G, 2015. The evolution of parasitism in Nematoda. Parasitology 142 Suppl 1, S26–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins JB, Jordan B, Baldwin L, Hebron C, Paras K, Vidyashankar AN, Kaplan RM, 2019. Resistance to fenbendazole in Ascaridia dissimilis, an important nematode parasite of turkeys. Poult. Sci 98, 5412–5415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Collins JB, Jordan B, Vidyashankar AN, Castro PJ, Fowler J, Kaplan RM, 2021. Impact of fenbendazole resistance in Ascaridia dissimilis on the economics of production in turkeys. Poult. Sci 100, 101435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Collins JB, Jordan B, Vidyashankar A, Bishop A, Kaplan RM. Fenbendazole resistance in Heterakis gallinarum, the vector of Histomonas meleagridis, on a broiler breeder farm in South Carolina. Vet. Parasitol.: Reg. Stud. Rep 2022. Sep 22;100785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Daş G, Wachter L, Stehr M, Bilic I, Grafl B, Wernsdorf P, Metges CC, Hess M, Liebhart D, 2021. Excretion of Histomonas meleagridis following experimental co-infection of distinct chicken lines with Heterakis gallinarum and Ascaridia galli. Parasit. Vectors 14, 323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davidse LC, 1973. Antimitotic activity of methyl benzimidazol-2-yl carbamate (MBC) in Aspergillus nidulans. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 3, 317–325. [Google Scholar]
  8. Doyle SR, Cotton JA, 2019. Genome-wide Approaches to Investigate Anthelmintic Resistance. Trends Parasitol 35, 289–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Doyle SR, Illingworth CJR, Laing R, Bartley DJ, Redman E, Martinelli A, Holroyd N, Morrison AA, Rezansoff A, Tracey A, Devaney E, Berriman M, Sargison N, Cotton JA, Gilleard JS, 2019. Population genomic and evolutionary modelling analyses reveal a single major QTL for ivermectin drug resistance in the pathogenic nematode, Haemonchus contortus. BMC Genomics 20, 218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Doyle SR, Laing R, Bartley D, Morrison A, Holroyd N, Maitland K, Antonopoulos A, Chaudhry U, Flis I, Howell S, McIntyre J, Gilleard JS, Tait A, Mable B, Kaplan R, Sargison N, Britton C, Berriman M, Devaney E, Cotton JA. Genomic landscape of drug response reveals mediators of anthelmintic resistance. Cell Rep 2022. Oct 18;41(3):111522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Driscoll M, Dean E, Reilly E, Bergholz E, Chalfie M, 1989. Genetic and molecular analysis of a Caenorhabditis elegans beta-tubulin that conveys benzimidazole sensitivity. J. Cell Biol 109, 2993–3003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Enos A, Coles GC, 1990. Effect of benzimidazole drugs on tubulin in benzimidazole resistant and susceptible strains of Caenorhabditis elegans. Int. J. Parasitol 20, 161–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hodgkinson JE, Clark HJ, Kaplan RM, Lake SL, Matthews JB, 2008. The role of polymorphisms at beta tubulin isotype 1 codons 167 and 200 in benzimidazole resistance in cyathostomins. Int. J. Parasitol 38, 1149–1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hotez PJ, Aksoy S, Brindley PJ, Kamhawi S, 2020. World neglected tropical diseases day. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis 14, e0007999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Howell SB, Burke JM, Miller JE, Terrill TH, Valencia E, Williams MJ, Williamson LH, Zajac AM, Kaplan RM, 2008. Prevalence of anthelmintic resistance on sheep and goat farms in the southeastern United States. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc 233, 1913–1919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Krücken J, Fraundorfer K, Mugisha JC, Ramünke S, Sifft KC, Geus D, Habarugira F, Ndoli J, Sendegeya A, Mukampunga C, Bayingana C, Aebischer T, Demeler J, Gahutu JB, Mockenhaupt FP, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, 2017. Reduced efficacy of albendazole against Ascaris lumbricoides in Rwandan schoolchildren. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist 7, 262–271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kwa MS, Veenstra JG, Roos MH, 1994a. Benzimidazole resistance in Haemonchus contortus is correlated with a conserved mutation at amino acid 200 in beta-tubulin isotype 1. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol 63, 299–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kwa MS, Veenstra JG, Roos MH, 1994b. Benzimidazole resistance in Haemonchus contortus is correlated with a conserved mutation at amino acid 200 in beta-tubulin isotype 1. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol 63, 299–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Laing R, Doyle SR, McIntyre J, Maitland K, Morrison A, Bartley DJ, Kaplan R, Chaudhry U, Sargison N, Tait A, Cotton JA, Britton C, Devaney E, 2022. Transcriptomic analyses implicate neuronal plasticity and chloride homeostasis in ivermectin resistance and response to treatment in a parasitic nematode. PLoS Pathog 18, e1010545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Leles D, Gardner SL, Reinhard K, Iñiguez A, Araujo A, 2012. Are Ascaris lumbricoides and Ascaris suum a single species? Parasit. Vectors 5, 42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Martin F, Halvarsson P, Delhomme N, Höglund J, Tydén E, 2021. Exploring the β-tubulin gene family in a benzimidazole-resistant Parascaris univalens population. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist 17, 84–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Özben M, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Freiin von Streit MKB, Wilkes EJA, Hughes KJ, Krücken J, 2022. Absence of Polymorphisms in Codons 167, 198 and 200 of All Seven β-Tubulin Isotypes of Benzimidazole Susceptible and Resistant Parascaris spp. Specimens from Australia. Pathogens 11. 10.3390/pathogens11050490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pankavich JA, Emro JE, Poeschel GP, Richard GA, 1974. Observations on the Life History of Ascaridia dissimilis (Perez Vigueras, 1931) and Its Relationship to Ascaridia galli (Schrank, 1788). J. Parasitol 60, 963–971. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Permin A, Bojesen M, Nansen P, Bisgaard M, Frandsen F, Pearman M, 1997. Ascaridia galli populations in chickens following single infections with different dose levels. Parasitol. Res 83, 614–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Roose S, Avramenko RW, Pollo SMJ, Wasmuth JD, Ame S, Ayana M, Betson M, Cools P, Dana D, Jones BP, Mekonnen Z, Morosetti A, Venkatesan A, Vlaminck J, Workentine ML, Levecke B, Gilleard JS, Geldhof P, 2021. Characterization of the β-tubulin gene family in Ascaris lumbricoides and Ascaris suum and its implication for the molecular detection of benzimidazole resistance. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis 15, e0009777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Silvestre A, Cabaret J, Humbert JF, 2001. Effect of benzimidazole under-dosing on the resistant allele frequency in Teladorsagia circumcincta (Nematoda). Parasitology 123, 103–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Spener R, Safe I, Baia-da-Silva DC, de Lacerda MVG, Cordeiro-Santos M, 2019. Loeffler’s syndrome. Int. J. Infect. Dis 89, 79–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vercruysse J, Behnke JM, Albonico M, Ame SM, Angebault C, Bethony JM, Engels D, Guillard B, Nguyen TVH, Kang G, Kattula D, Kotze AC, McCarthy JS, Mekonnen Z, Montresor A, Periago MV, Sumo L, Tchuenté L-AT, Dang TCT, Zeynudin A, Levecke B, 2011. Assessment of the anthelmintic efficacy of albendazole in school children in seven countries where soil-transmitted helminths are endemic. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis 5, e948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yazwinski TA, Tucker CA, Wray E, Jones L, Clark FD, 2013. Observations of benzimidazole efficacies against Ascaridia dissimilis, Ascaridia galli, and Heterakis gallinarum in naturally infected poultry. J. Appl. Poult. Res 22, 75–79. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES