Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2023 Jun 9;11:e15376. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15376

Systemic effect of calcium silicate-based cements with different radiopacifiers-histopathological analysis in rats

Osman Ataş 1,#, Kubra Bılge 2,✉,#, Semsettin Yıldız 1, Serkan Dundar 3, Ilknur Calik 4, Asime Gezer Ataş 5, Alihan Bozoglan 3
Editor: Shahroo Etemad-Moghadam
PMCID: PMC10259441  PMID: 37312877

Abstract

Aim

This in vivo study aimed to examine the systemic effects of contemporary calcium silicate cements (CSC) contain different radiopacifiers in rats.

Materials & Methods

Polyethylene tubes filled with BIOfactor MTA (BIO), Neo MTA Plus (NEO), MTA Repair HP (REP), Biodentine (DENT) and empty tubes (control group) were implanted into the subcutaneous tissues of 80 male Spraque Dawley rats for 7 and 30 days (n = 8). After 7 and 30 day, samples of liver and kidney tissues were submitted to histopathological analysis. Blood samples were collected to evaluate changes in hepatic and renal functions of rats. Wilcoxon and post hoc Dunn Bonferroni tests were used to compare between the 7th and 30th days in order to evaluate the histopathological data. Paired-sample t-test was used to compare laboratory values between the 7th and 30th days, ANOVA analysis and a post hoc Tukey test were used to compare values between groups (p < 0.05).

Results

On the 7th day, REP, BIO and NEO groups were statistically similar in kidney tissue and the degree of inflammation was found to be significantly higher in these groups compared to the control and DENT groups. On the 30th day, the degree of inflammation of the REP and NEO groups in the kidney tissue was found to be significantly higher than the control, BIO and DENT groups. Although the inflammation in the liver was moderate and mild on the 7th and 30th days, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. Vascular congestion was evaluated as mild and moderate in kidney and liver in all groups, and no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. While there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the 7th day AST, ALT and urea values, when the creatinine values were compared, the DENT and NEO groups were found to be statistically similar and significantly lower than the control group. On the 30th day, ALT values were statistically similar between the groups. The AST values of the BIO group were found to be significantly higher than the DENT group. While BIO, DENT, NEO and control groups had statistically similar urea values, the REP group was found to be significantly higher than the other groups. The creatinine value of the REP group was significantly higher than the groups other than the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

CSCs with different radiopacifiers had similar and acceptable effects on the histological examination of the kidneys and liver systemically, and serum ALT, AST, urea, creatinine levels.

Keywords: Biocompatibility, Calcium silicate-based cement, Radiopacifier, Inflammation, Systemic effect

Introduction

Calcium silicate cements (CSC) are called biomaterials because of their appropriate biological and physicochemical properties, in addition to their bioactivity (Camilleri, Sorrentino & Damidot, 2013). Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is a Portland-cement-based (PC) CSC that was developed as an endodontic biomaterial in the 1990s. It consists mainly of PC with a radiopacifier bismuth oxide (Bi2O3). MTA is considered the gold-standard material for various clinical procedures due to its physicochemical and biological properties (Benetti et al., 2019). Although it has high biocompatibility and is widely used in various applications—such as furcation or root perforation, internal or external resorption, retro filling in apical microsurgery, pulp capping, apexification, and apexogenesis—it also has some disadvantages (Cintra et al., 2017; Parirokh & Torabinejad, 2010). MTA takes a significant amount of time to harden, is difficult to manipulate, and can cause tooth discoloration, release some heavy metal components (for example Aluminum) and detrimentally affect tissues (Camilleri, 2014; Ashi et al., 2022; Slompo et al., 2015).

Biodentine (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France) is more biocompatible than MTA and contains a significant amount of tricalcium silicate compounds, and zirconium oxide (ZrO2) as a radiopacifier has been proposed as an alternative material that overcomes MTA’s indication limitations and improves on its physicochemical properties. Biodentine has been suggested to be superior to other hydraulic CSC in terms of content, working time and physical, chemical and biological properties (Cuadros-Fernández et al., 2016; Rajasekharan et al., 2017). Previous studies have reported that Biodentine performs similarly to MTA regarding inflammatory cell response and hard tissue formation (Nowicka et al., 2013; Tran et al., 2012).

MTA Repair HP (Angelus, Londrina, Parana, Brazil) was developed as a highly plastic repair material aimed at preserving MTA’s biological properties but improving its chemical and physical properties. MTA Repair HP contains calcium tungstate (CaWO4) as a radiopacifier to prevent tooth discoloration (Tomás-Catalá et al., 2018). Although it has a short setting time, it exhibits a fast and effective bioactive response (Del Carmen Jiménez-Sánchez, Segura-Egea & Díaz-Cuenca, 2019). MTA Repair HP has demonstrated the ability to induce cytocompatibility and adequate biological response in human dental pulp stem cells in terms of cell proliferation, morphology, migration, and attachment (Tomás-Catalá et al., 2017).

NeoMTA Plus (Avalon Biomed Inc., Bradenton, Florida, USA) is a bioactive cement developed based on previous MTA and MTA Plus formulations, is based on calcium silicate and tantalum oxide (Ta2O5), a radiopaque element that is included in the formulation instead of Bi2O3 to reduce the possibility of tooth discoloration (Tanomaru-Filho et al., 2017).

In recent years, a new type of MTA was launched as BIOfactor MTA (Imicryl Dental, Konya, Turkey), and it can be used for pulp capping, pulpotomy, apexification, and retrograde filling, apical plug procedures, and root perforation repair (Öznurhan, Kayabasi & Keskus, 2020). This powdered material contains ytterbium oxide (Yb2O3, a radiopacifier), tricalcium aluminate, and tricalcium, dicalcium silicate (Akbulut et al., 2019). The manufacturer claims that BIOfactor MTA has a shorter curing time, stronger sealing, easier handling, finer powder for faster hydration than the other materials, and no discoloration of teeth (Öznurhan, Kayabasi & Keskus, 2020).

Despite its excellent radiopacity, Bi2O3 has been associated with adverse effects on MTA’s physicochemical properties (Camilleri, 2008). Studies have shown that MTA’s color changes over time and suggested that the main cause of tooth discoloration is radiopacifiers, while the yellowish hue of Bi2O3 is thought to cause this condition (Ramos et al., 2016). Several studies have reported that Bi2O3 reduces the release of Ca++ ions by interfering with MTA’s hydration, inhibiting its bioactivity and detrimentally affecting its biocompatibility (Camilleri, 2008; Garcia et al., 2017; Huck et al., 2017).

Studies have reported systemic effects caused by dental materials, with the adverse effect on different organs of body. Morphological changes in the liver and kidney were also reported as systemic effects associated with CSC implanted into dorsal subcutaneous tissue of rats (Garcia et al., 2017; Khalil & Eid, 2013). CSC materials release heavy metals which can reach the bloodstream, the ISO 10993–1 also recommends assessing the systemic toxicity of materials (ISO, 2006).

Due to the undesirable physicochemical and biological effects of Bi2O3 (Kharouf et al., 2021), alternative radiopacifiers such as CaWO4 (Tomás-Catalá et al., 2018), ZrO2 (Cuadros-Fernández et al., 2016), ZnO (Garcia et al., 2017), Ta2O5 (Tanomaru-Filho et al., 2017), Yb2O3 (Akbulut et al., 2019) have been proposed. Compositional modifications change not only the material’s physicochemical properties but also its biomechanical and biological (bioactivity) properties (Jiménez-Sánchez, Segura-Egea & Díaz-Cuenca, 2019). The current study aimed to investigate the systemic effects of CSC containing ZrO2, Yb2O3, Ta2O5 and CaWO4 instead of Bi2O3 as a radiopacifier agent in vivo.

Materials & Methods

Approval for this study was obtained from Firat University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee (Dated 23/10/2019; No. 2019/21). Rats were obtained from Firat University Experimental Animals Research Center. All studies on rats were conducted at Firat University Experimental Animals Research Center.

Power analysis using the Power and Sample Size program revealed a standard deviation of 0.2, power of 0.80, and an effect size of 0.35. At α 0.05, the sample number was determined to be a minimum of 8 (n = 8), and the minimum sample size was 80 rats for the 7-day and 30-day subgroups. The Spraque Dawley rat breed was used, and the rats weighed 250–300 g, were male, and were six months to one year old. Eight rats were kept per cage in an air-conditioned room with a temperature of 20–22 °C throughout the study period, and they were fed standard rat chow and water. The surgical procedure was performed by a single operator with animal experience.

Study protocol

Eighty rats were randomly divided into five groups of 16 rats: Control, BIOfactor MTA (BIO), Neo MTA Plus (NEO), MTA Repair HP (REP), and Biodentin (DENT) groups. For the 7th-day and 30th-day subgroups, each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 8). A diagram describing groups and subgroups is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1. Diagram describing groups and subgroups.

Figure 1

The studied materials were prepared under aseptic conditions in accordance with the respective manufacturers’ instructions, filled into polyethylene tubes with an inner diameter of 1.5 mm and a length of 10 mm, and sterilized with ethylene oxide gas by means of a sterile lentulo (Dentsply/Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). The materials used in this study are presented in Table 1. All surgical procedures were performed under general anesthesia in sterile conditions. Rompun® 10 mg/kg (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) and Xylazine® 40 mg/kg (Bioveta PLC., Czech Republic) was administered to rats intramuscularly with an appropriate injector. After shaving subjects’ surgical areas, they were disinfected with 5% povidone-iodine. A one cm incision was made at the center of the rats’ backs. The incision site was opened with a sterile periosteal elevator, and channels were created subcutaneous with blunt dissection of approximately two cm (Bisturi #15, Ethicon; Johnson & Johnson, São José dos Campos, Brazil). Empty and sterile polyethylene tubes were inserted into this channel for the control group, while polyethylene tubes filled with each group’s respective studied material were inserted into this channel for the other groups. The polyethylene tubes were inserted such that they came into contact with rats’ subcutaneous tissue. The incision area was closed primarily using a 3/0 silk suture (Doğsan, Turkey) (Garcia et al., 2017).

Table 1. Materials used in the study, their manufacturers and compositions.

Materials Manufacturer Composition
Biodentine Septodont, St. Maur-des- Fossés, France Powder: Tricalcium Silicate (Ca3SiO5), Dicalcium Silicate (Ca2SiO4), Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3), Iron Oxide (Fe2O3), and Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2). Liquid: Water (H2O) with Calcium chloride (CaCl2) and soluble polymer (polycarboxylate).
NeoMTA Plus Avalon Biomed, Bradenton, Florida Powder: Tricalcium Silicate (Ca3SiO5), Dicalcium Silicate (Ca2SiO4), and Tantalum Oxide (Ta2O5). Liquid: Water (H2O) and proprietary polymers.
MTA Repair HP Angelus, Londrína, Parana, Brazil Powder: Tricalcium Silicate (Ca3SiO5), Dicalcium Silicate (Ca2SiO4), Tricalcium Aluminate (3CaO.Al2O3), Calcium Oxide (CaO), and Calcium Tungstate (CaWO4). Liquid: Water and polymer plasticizer.
BIOfactor MTA Imicryl Dental, Konya, Turkey Powder: Tricalcium Silicate, Dicalcium Silicate, Tricalcium Aluminate, Ytterbium Oxide as a radiopacifier Liquid: 0.5%–3% Hydrosoluble carboxylated polymer, demineralized water

Evaluation parameters

After 7 and 30-day experimental time intervals, the rats were anesthetized with 90 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride (HCL) and 5 mg/kg of xylazine hydrochloride to enable blood sampling. With heparinized capillary tubes (BD Vacutainer, BD, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA), blood (5 mL) was collected via the intracardiac method under vacuum from the saphenous vein of the retro-orbital plexus (Khalil & Eid, 2013). Then, the subjects were euthanized by decapitation under 60 mg/kg of ketamine HCL anesthesia on the 7th and 30th day, in accordance with their subgroup. To standardize sampling, only the left kidney of each rat was collected. The rats’ kidneys and livers were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24 h at room temperature routine sample processing, the samples were embedded in paraffin blocks, and serial sections of 4 µm thickness were obtained on a microtome (Leica SM 2000R, Leica Instruments, Wetzlar, Germany). The sections were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and evaluated under a light microscope (Olympus BX53) by a blinded pathologist. Digital photomicrographs were taken using the Olympus cellSens Standard system.

A histological examination of subjects’ renal inflammatory response revealed fibroblast proliferation in the cortex, vascular congestion, macrophage activity, and hypercellularity (Khalil & Eid, 2013). Inflammation in the liver, fibroblast proliferation, vascular congestion, macrophages, multinuclear giant cells, and micro-macrovesicular steatosis and apoptosis in hepatocytes were evaluated. Tissue reactions were classified as follows: absent (0), mild (1), moderate (2), and severe (3) (Standardization IOF, 2018). The score was given to each implant from three non-serial H&E-stained sections evaluated by one blinded pathologist. The inflammation reaction score was obtained in the non-serial H&E-stained sections as follows: 0, without inflammatory infiltrate (none or scarce inflammatory cells); (1) mild inflammatory reaction (until 25 inflammatory cells/field); (2) moderate inflammatory reaction (26 until 125 inflammatory cells/field); and (3) severe/intense inflammatory reaction (over 125 inflammatory cells/field). Thus, the score of each specimen was attributed from the data obtained in the numerical density of inflammatory cells (described above) (Delfino et al., 2021).

The blood samples previously collected in heparinized tubes were transferred to Eppendorf tubes (Eppendorf do Brasil Ltda., São Paulo, Brazil) and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm. After centrifugation, one mL of plasma was collected. ALT and AST serum enzymes were used to evaluate liver function and then subjected to biochemical analysis to measure urea and creatinine levels in order to assess kidney function.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of all data was conducted using the IBM SPSS Ver. 22.0 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences software; IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, Illinois, USA) statistical program. Normality analysis was performed with a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. A paired-sample t-test was used to compare laboratory values between the 7th and 30th days, and Analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis and a post hoc Tukey test were used to compare the values between the groups, according to the applied materials. Wilcoxon and post hoc Dunn Bonferroni tests were used to compare between the 7th and 30th days in order to evaluate histopathological data. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used for reference.

Results

Kidney function

Evaluation of the materials after 7 days

No inflammation was observed in the control group after 7 days (Fig. 2A). Inflammation was evaluated as mild to moderate for the REP (Fig. 2B), BIO (Fig. 2C), and NEO groups (Fig. 2E). The REP, BIO, and NEO groups were statistically similar, and the degree of inflammation in these groups was found to be significantly higher than in the control and DENT groups (Fig. 2D) (p < 0.05).

Figure 2. 7th and 30th day histological images of kidney tissue for all groups.

Figure 2

Photomicrographs of histological sections of kidney at 7th day: (A) Control group; no inflammation and grade 2 congestion. (B) REP group; grade 1 inflammation and grade 2 congestion. (C) BİO group; grade 2 inflammation and mild (grade 1) congestion. (D) DENT group; grade 1 inflammation and moderate (grade 2) vascular congestion. (E) NEO group; severe (grade 3) inflammation and minimal congestion. Photomicrographs of histological sections of kidney at 30th day: (A*) Control group; no inflammation and grade 2 congestion. (B*) REP group; grade 3 inflammation and grade 1 congestion. (C*) BİO group; grade 1 inflammation and congestion. (D*) DENT group; grade 1 inflammation. (E*) NEO group; mild inflammation and congestion. No additional pathology was seen in any group (H&E x200. Black arrow: Vascular congestion, blue arrow: Inflammation).

Although vascular congestion was evaluated as mild and moderate in all groups, the most severe congestion was observed in the REP group. No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in this regard (p > 0.05).

Tissue reactions with the materials at 7th day are presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Degrees of inflammation and vascular congestion in kidney tissues.
Implant material Inflammation grade p (7-30)
7th days 30th days
G0 G1 G2 G3 G0 G1 G2 G3
Control 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1.000
REP 4 3 1 0 1 4 2 1 0.095
BİO 5 2 1 0 6 2 0 0 0.438
DENT 7 1 0 0 6 1 1 0 0.405
NEO 3 2 2 1 5 2 1 0 0.213
p (groups) 0.037 0.005

Evaluation of the materials after 30 days

Although the inflammation grades of the REP (Fig. 2B*) and NEO groups (Fig. 2E*) were statistically similar on 30th day, a statistically significant difference was observed between these two groups and the control (Fig. 2A*), BIO (Fig. 2C*) and DENT groups (Fig. 2D*) (p = 0.005). The degree of inflammation of the REP and NEO groups was found to be significantly higher than in the control, BIO and DENT groups.

No statistically significant difference in vascular congestion grades was observed between the groups (p = 0.456). The most intense inflammation was detected in the control and BIO groups.

Tissue reactions with the materials at 30th day are presented in Table 2.

Comparing Day 7 and Day 30 results

Although inflammation was found to be statistically similar on the 7th day across all groups, on the 30th day, a slight increase in the severity of inflammation was observed compared to the 7th day data (p > 0.05). Inflammation was mostly detected in the REP group at mild to moderate levels.

The vascular congestion levels of the REP, DENT, and NEO groups were found to have statistically significantly decreased (p < 0.05).

The evaluation of kidney tissues on the 7th and 30th days revealed no fibroblast proliferation, macrophages, multinuclear giant cells, or hypercellularity in the cortex.

Liver function

Evaluation of the materials after 7 days

Mild inflammation was observed in the control (Fig. 3A) and REP groups (Fig. 3B) on day 7, while mild to moderate inflammation was observed in the BIO (Fig. 3C), NEO (Fig. 3E), DENT groups (Fig. 3D). No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups (p > 0.05).

Figure 3. 7th and 30th day histological images of liver tissue for all groups.

Figure 3

Photomicrographs of histological sections of liver at 7th day: (A) Control group; grade 1 inflammation and congestion. (B) REP group; grade 1 inflammation and congestion. (C) BİO group; grade 2 inflammation. (D) DENT group; grade 2 inflammation and grade 1 congestion. (E) NEO group; mild inflammation and congestion. Photomicrographs of histological sections of liver at 30th day: (A*) Control group; grade 1 inflammation and congestion. (B*) REP group; severe (grade 3) inflammation and mild congestion. (C*) BİO group; no inflammation and severe congestion. (D*) DENT group; grade 1 inflammation and congestion. (E*) NEO group; mild inflammation and congestion. No additional pathology was seen in any group (H&E x200. Black arrow: Vascular congestion, blue arrow: Inflammation).

While vascular congestion was mild in the REP group, it was mild to moderate in the other groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups (p > 0.05).

Tissue reactions with the materials on 7th day are presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Degrees of inflammation and vascular congestion in liver tissues.
Implant material Inflammation grade p (7-30)
7th days 30th days
G0 G1 G2 G3 G0 G1 G2 G3
Control 0 8 0 0 0 7 1 0 0.334
REP 0 8 0 0 0 4 3 1 0.080
BİO 0 5 3 0 1 5 2 0 0.405
DENT 0 5 3 0 0 7 1 0 0.278
NEO 0 6 2 0 1 7 0 0 0.092
p (groups) 0.135 0.322

Evaluation of the materials after 30 days

Inflammation was mildest in the NEO group (Fig. 3E*) on day 30, while it was mild to moderate in the REP (Fig. 3B*) and BIO groups (Fig. 3C*). No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups (p > 0.05).

Vascular congestion was generally moderate in all groups, especially the most intense congestion was detected in the control (Fig. 3A*) and BIO groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups (p > 0.05).

Tissue reactions with the studied materials at 30th day are presented in Table 3.

Comparing Day 7 and Day 30 results

No statistically significant difference was observed between the day 30 inflammation grades and the day 7 inflammation grades for all groups (p > 0.05). Compared to the 7th day, the severity of inflammation was determined to have decreased in all groups except the REP group on day 30.

When the 30th-day vascular congestion grades were compared with the 7th day grades, no significant difference was found in the other groups (p > 0.05), though the NEO group was found to have increased statistically significantly (p < 0.05). According to the 7th day data, the severity of congestion increased in all groups except the DENT group (Fig. 3D*).

Evaluation of the liver tissues on the 7th and 30th days detected no fibroblast proliferation, macrophages, multinuclear giant cells, micro-macrovesicular steatosis, or apoptosis in hepatocytes.

Blood sample analysis

After 7 days

While there no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in AST, ALT, and urea values (p > 0.05), a comparison of creatinine values revealed that the DENT and NEO groups were statistically similar to each other but statistically different from the other groups and significantly lower than the control group (p > 0.05).

After 30 days

When the AST values were compared, the BIO group’s AST values were found to be significantly higher than the DENT group’s (p < 0.05). ALT values were found to be statistically similar between the groups (p > 0.05). The BIO, DENT, NEO, and control groups were found to have statistically similar urea values, while the REP group was found to have significantly higher urea values than the other groups (p < 0.05). The creatinine value of the REP group was significantly higher than the other groups, except for the control group (p < 0.05).

Comparing Day 7 and Day 30 results

The control group’s AST and ALT values increased statistically significantly, and their urea values decreased significantly (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference in creatinine values was observed (p > 0.05).

Although no statistically significant difference in AST, ALT, or creatinine values was observed in the DENT group, its urea values decreased significantly (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference in any parameter was observed for the NEO group (p > 0.05).

Moreover, no statistically significant difference in AST and ALT values was observed in the REP group (p > 0.05), while the group’s urea and creatinine values increased significantly (p < 0.05).

No significant difference in ALT and creatinine values was observed in the BIO group (p > 0.05), though this group’s AST value increased significantly (p < 0.05), and its urea value decreased significantly (p < 0.05). Blood sample values between groups and 7.-30. comparison between days presented in Table 4.

Table 4. Blood sample values between groups and 7-30 comparison between days.
7. Days 30. Days p (7-30 days)
Mean ±SD p (groups) Mean ±SD p (groups)
AST Control 169.13 ± 33.15a 0.478 242.00 ± 47.17a,b 0.032 0.006
DENT 221.50 ± 45.36a 192.60 ± 23.18a 0.099
NEO 239.88 ± 163.62a 241.25 ± 43.88a,b 0.979
REP 217.88 ± 30.18a 218.63 ± 60.16a,b 0.975
BIO 199.25 ± 36.18a 286.75 ± 102.03b 0.045
ALT Control 64.63 ± 4.95a 0.743 72.25 ± 8.37a 0.095 0.028
DENT 63.50 ± 9.19a 60.00 ± 8.34a 0.473
NEO 67.88 ± 23.01a 70.75 ± 12.10a 0.732
REP 61.50 ± 5.07a 68.13 ± 29.95a 0.571
BIO 68.63 ± 8.17a 84.13 ± 20.87a 0.098
UREA Control 52.63 ± 5.73a 0.676 45.75 ± 4.8a 0.002 0.046
DENT 51.88 ± 4.08a 46.00 ± 6.07a 0.033
NEO 51.25 ± 7.92a 47.00 ± 5.58a 0.260
REP 48.63 ± 4.40a 54.50 ± 5.97b 0.026
BIO 51.75 ± 5.41a 43.88 ± 2.32a 0.009
CREATININE Control 0.34 ± 0.04a 0.003 0.32 ± 0.02a,b 0.002 0.200
DENT 0.27 ± 0.03b 0.29 ± 0.4b 0.934
NEO 0.28 ± 0.03b 0.31 ± 0.03b 0.171
REP 0.32 ± 0.03a,b 0.39 ± 0.08a 0.050
BIO 0.32 ± 0.04a,b 0.31 ± 0.05b 0.652

Notes.

Note: Different letters are given to the groups where the difference occurs.

Discussion

In treating vital pulp, the most important feature required in a material applied directly to the exposed pulp is biocompatibility. Biocompatibility is defined as the material’s ability to produce an acceptable tissue reaction (Poggio et al., 2014). Implantation tests applied to experimental animals have an important place in determining the bioavailability of calcium silicate-based cement (Demirkaya et al., 2016). Systemic effects can be determined after materials’ subcutaneous implantation (Garcia et al., 2017).

Reports have discussed the effect of various calcium silicate-based cements on the kidney, liver, and brain after subcutaneous implantation in animals (Demirkaya et al., 2016; Khalil & Eid, 2013; Simsek et al., 2016). According to the ISO 10993-1 guideline, the systemic toxicity of all materials in contact with the blood should be evaluated (Polyzois, Dahl & Hensten-Pettersen, 1995). One indicator of the systemic effect of any substance entering the body is the level of enzymes in the blood. Aminotransferases are considered to indicate liver cell damage. Various drugs or toxins are known to increase aminotransferase levels (Ersoy, 2012). Studies have indicated that changes in serum ALT and AST levels are induced by calcium silicate-based cement and that the material may interfere with hepatic functional activity (Garcia et al., 2017; Khalil & Eid, 2013). In the current study, no statistically significant decreases or differences were observed in serum AST, ALT, urea, and creatinine values between the 7th and 30th days except for the BIO group, and this finding suggests that these materials cause systemically similar and acceptable responses. To better gauge the impact on the BIO group, new studies evaluating systemic effects may be needed.

Radiopacity is important in distinguishing endodontic materials from surrounding structures, such as dentin and alveolar bone (Laghios et al., 2000). Therefore, the addition of a radiopassivating agent to these materials may alter their biological properties. Bi2O3 was initially added to MTA as a radiopacifier, but concerns have suggested that it may increase the material’s porosity, thereby reducing its compressive strength and, consequently, altering its biological properties (Camilleri, 2007). To analyze possible cytotoxic effects on periapical tissues, the relationship between calcium-silicate-based cement and radiopacifiers should be subjected to biocompatibility tests (Lodiene et al., 2008). In the current study, calcium-silicate-based cement containing different radiopacifiers was inserted into rats subcutaneously via polyethylene tubes; the materials were brought into contact with the blood, and histopathological changes to the liver and kidney tissues, as well as changes in enzyme levels, were evaluated.

Guerreiro-Tanomaru et al. (2012) showed that materials based on PC materials exhibit similar antimicrobial activity and pH to pure PC by adding different radiopacifiers (Bi2O3, CaWO4, and ZrO2). In a study, pure PC, PC/Bi2O3, PC/ZrO2, and PC/CaWO4 eluates were evaluated. The study concluded that all PC/radiopacifier combinations were not cytotoxic to periodontal ligament cells and that the PC/ZrO2 combination obtained the best biocompatibility results (Cornélio et al., 2011). Calcium-silicate-based cement associated with ZrO2 exhibited low cytotoxicity, high cellular viability, and bioactive potential (Gomes-Cornélio et al., 2017). Additionally, when placed in the subcutaneous tissues of rats, this material exhibited biocompatibility and bioactive potential (Silva et al., 2017).

Although different materials use CaWO4 as a radiopacifier, few studies have reported its effects on cell activity, and no cytotoxic effects have been reported (Cuppini et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2013). Calcium is known to induce cell proliferation through the activation of calcium channels and calcium-sensing receptors, leading to changes in the cell cycle that increase proliferation (Chen et al., 2019). The release of Ca+ ions is important in the bioactivity of endodontic cement and in increasing its ability to induce tissue formation. In addition to leaving the mechanical properties of PC unaltered, CaWO4 is considered a radiopacifier that offers sufficient biocompatibility (Abdalla et al., 2020; Cornélio et al., 2011).

Ta2O5 is an inert and compatible material that increases other metals’ biocompatibility through surface nanoparticle coating (Fathi & Mortazavi, 2008). The presence of tantalum and zirconium has been reported to support the osteo/odontogenic differentiation of pulp cells (Abou ElReash et al., 2021). Previous studies have shown that iRootBP Plus and NeoMTA Plus containing Ta2O5 promote mineralization and the formation of dentin bridges in vitro and in vivo (Liu, Wang & Dong, 2015; Tanomaru-Filho et al., 2017).

Ytterbium is a very ductile metal that reacts slowly with water and is used in imaging examinations (Xing et al., 2012). Calcium-silicate-based cement containing ytterbium trifluoride (YbF3) has exhibited promising physicochemical properties for use as a biomaterial (Antonijevic et al., 2015). Compared to the control group in a study, calcium-silicate-based cement/Yb2O3 exhibited higher cell viability and no cytotoxic effects on osteoblast cells, and it was considered bioactive (Costa et al., 2018).

According to the ISO 7405 specification, a material is compatible when it reduces tissue reaction over time (up to 90 days) after subcutaneous implantation (Lyapina et al., 2015). Based on the results obtained in the current study, all cement can be considered to cause a similar inflammatory response when implanted into the subcutaneous tissue, and this inflammation can be considered to decrease over time, reflecting acceptable biocompatibility. Additionally, the absence of fibroblast proliferation, macrophages, multinuclear giant cells, micro-macrovesicular steatosis, and apoptosis in hepatocytes during the evaluation of liver tissues and the absence of fibroblast proliferation, macrophages, multinuclear giant cells, and hypercellularity in the cortex during the evaluation of kidney tissues suggest that these materials can be evaluated as biocompatible.

Despite the reliability of systemic toxicity tests using animal models, the findings observed in these studies should not be entirely considered in humans (Khalil & Eid, 2013). The minimum amount of material is placed in humans for various endodontic procedures, and it should be noted that non-human animal organs may be more responsive to cement implantation due to the ratio of implanted material to the total weight of laboratory animals compared to humans. Moreover, it should be noted that the materials harden relatively quickly and do not release their contents once cured (Torabinejad, Parirokh & Dummer, 2018). Additionally, the amount of material required to significantly change tissues and organs located at certain distances from an application site has not yet been clarified. However, these preliminary results from animal experiments are important.

Conclusion

The current study found that CSC containing different radiopacifiers has no deleterious effects on the structural integrity of the liver and kidney or on serum AST, ALT, urea, and creatine levels. These findings suggest that these materials have similar and acceptable effects systemically and are systemically adverse when used as biomaterials. It can be concluded that they will not cause harmful consequences when used in accordance with manufacturer specifications. However, this study must be supported by further laboratory and clinical studies. In addition, further investigations can be performed using longer analysis times for systemic reactions.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Author Checklist.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15376/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Raw Data.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15376/supp-2

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Firat University Scientific Research Project Foundation Department, Elazig, Turkey with the project number DHF.19.06. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Osman Ataş conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Kubra Bılge analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Semsettin Yıldız analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Serkan Dundar conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Ilknur Calik analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Asime Gezer Ataş performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Alihan Bozoglan performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Approval for this study was obtained from Firat Univrsity Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee (Dated 23/10/2019; No. 2019/21). All studies on rats were conducted at F.U. Experimental Research Center.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are available in the Supplementary File.

References

  • Abdalla et al. (2020).Abdalla MM, Lung CYK, Neelakantan P, Matinlinna JP. A novel, doped calcium silicate bioceramic synthesized by sol–gel method: investigation of setting time and biological properties. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2020;108(1):56–66. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Abou ElReash et al. (2021).Abou ElReash A, Hamama H, Grawish M, Saeed M, Zaen El-Din A, Shahin M, Zhenhuan W, Xiaoli X. A laboratory study to test the responses of human dental pulp stem cells to extracts from three dental pulp capping biomaterials. International Endodontic Journal. 2021;54(7):1118–1128. doi: 10.1111/iej.13495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Akbulut et al. (2019).Akbulut MB, Bozkurt DA, Terlemez A, Akman M. The push-out bond strength of BIOfactor mineral trioxide aggregate, a novel root repair material. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2019;44:1–9. doi: 10.5395/rde.2019.44.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Antonijevic et al. (2015).Antonijevic D, Jeschke A, Colovic B, Milovanovic P, Jevremovic D, Kisic D, Vom Scheidt A, Hahn M, Amling M, Jokanovic V, Busse B, Djuric M. Addition of a fluoride-containing radiopacifier improves micromechanical and biological characteristics of modified calcium silicate cements. Journal of Endodontics. 2015;41(12):2050–2057. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ashi et al. (2022).Ashi T, Mancino D, Hardan L, Bourgi R, Zghal J, Macaluso V, Al-Ashkar S, Alkhouri S, Haikel Y, Kharouf N. Physicochemical and antibacterial properties of bioactive retrograde filling materials. Bioengineering. 2022;9(11):624–634. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9110624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benetti et al. (2019).Benetti F, Queiroz ÍODA, Cosme-Silva L, Conti LC, Oliveira SHPD, Cintra LTA. Cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and biomineralization of a new ready-for-use bioceramic repair material. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2019;30:325–332. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201902457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Camilleri (2007).Camilleri J. Hydration mechanisms of mineral trioxide aggregate. International Endodontic Journal. 2007;40(6):462–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01248.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Camilleri (2008).Camilleri J. Characterization of hydration products of mineral trioxide aggregate. International Endodontic Journal. 2008;41(5):408–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01370.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Camilleri (2014).Camilleri J. Color stability of white mineral trioxide aggregate in contact with hypochlorite solution. Journal of Endodontics. 2014;40(3):436–440. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Camilleri, Sorrentino & Damidot (2013).Camilleri J, Sorrentino F, Damidot D. Investigation of the hydration and bioactivity of radiopacified tricalcium silicate cement, Biodentine and MTA Angelus. Dental Materials. 2013;29(5):580–593. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Del Carmen Jiménez-Sánchez, Segura-Egea & Díaz-Cuenca (2019).Del Carmen Jiménez-Sánchez M, Segura-Egea JJ, Díaz-Cuenca A. MTA HP repair stimulates in vitro an homogeneous calcium phosphate phase coating deposition. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2019;11(4):e322. doi: 10.4317/jced.55661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2019).Chen Y, Gao Y, Tao Y, Lin D, An S. Identification of a calcium-sensing receptor in human dental pulp cells that regulates mineral trioxide aggregate—induced mineralization. Journal of Endodontics. 2019;45(7):907–916. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cintra et al. (2017).Cintra LTA, Benetti F, De Azevedo Queiroz ÍO, De Araújo Lopes JM, De Oliveira SHP, Araújo GS, Gomes-Filho JE. Cytotoxicity, biocompatibility, and biomineralization of the new high-plasticity MTA material. Journal of Endodontics. 2017;43(5):774–778. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cornélio et al. (2011).Cornélio ALG, Salles LP, Da Paz MC, Cirelli JA, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru Filho M. Cytotoxicity of Portland cement with different radiopacifying agents: a cell death study. Journal of Endodontics. 2011;37(2):203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Costa et al. (2018).Costa BC, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Bosso-Martelo R, Rodrigues EM, Bonetti-Filho I, Tanomaru-Filho M. Ytterbium oxide as radiopacifier of calcium silicate-based cements. Physicochemical and biological properties. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2018;29:452–458. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201802033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cuadros-Fernández et al. (2016).Cuadros-Fernández C, Lorente Rodríguez A, Sáez-Martínez S, García-Binimelis J, Mercadé M. Short-term treatment outcome of pulpotomies in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine: a randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2016;20(7):1639–1645. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1656-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cuppini et al. (2019).Cuppini M, Zatta KC, Mestieri LB, Grecca FS, Leitune VCB, Guterres SS, Collares FM. Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory drug-delivery systems at endodontic reparative material: synthesis and characterization. Dental Materials. 2019;35(3):457–467. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Delfino et al. (2021).Delfino MM, De Abreu Jampani JL, Lopes CS, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M, Sasso-Cerri E, Cerri PS. Comparison of Bio-C Pulpo and MTA Repair HP with White MTA: effect on liver parameters and evaluation of biocompatibility and bioactivity in rats. International Endodontic Journal. 2021;54(9):1597–1613. doi: 10.1111/iej.13567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Demirkaya et al. (2016).Demirkaya K, Can Demirdöğen B, Öncel Torun Z, Erdem O, Cetinkaya S, Akay C. In vivo evaluation of the effects of hydraulic calcium silicate dental cements on plasma and liver aluminium levels in rats. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2016;124(1):75–81. doi: 10.1111/eos.12238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ersoy (2012).Ersoy O. Karaciğer enzim yüksekliğinin değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Medical Journal. 2012;12(3):129–135. [Google Scholar]
  • Fathi & Mortazavi (2008).Fathi MH, Mortazavi V. Tantalum, niobium and titanium coatings for biocompa improvement of dental implants. Dental Research Journal. 2008;4(2):74–82. [Google Scholar]
  • Garcia et al. (2017).Garcia LDFR, Huck C, Magalhães FAC, Souza PPCd, Souza Costa CAD. Systemic effect of mineral aggregate-based cements: histopathological analysis in rats. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2017;25:620–630. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gomes-Cornélio et al. (2017).Gomes-Cornélio A, Rodrigues E, Salles L, Mestieri L, Faria G, Guerreiro-Tanomaru J, Tanomaru-Filho M. Bioactivity of MTA plus, biodentine and an experimental calcium silicate-based cement on human osteoblast-like cells. International Endodontic Journal. 2017;50(1):39–47. doi: 10.1111/iej.12589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guerreiro-Tanomaru et al. (2012).Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Cornélio ALG, Andolfatto C, Salles LP, Tanomaru-Filho M. pH and antimicrobial activity of Portland cement associated with different radiopacifying agents. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2012;2012:138–143. doi: 10.5402/2012/469019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huck et al. (2017).Huck C, Barud HDS, Basso FG, Costa CADS, Hebling J, Garcia LDFR. Cytotoxicity of new calcium aluminate cement (EndoBinder) containing different radiopacifiers. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2017;28:57–64. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201701023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ISO (2006). ISO. 2006. Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 11. Tests for systemic toxicity. International Organization for Standardization Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Jiménez-Sánchez, Segura-Egea & Díaz-Cuenca (2019).Jiménez-Sánchez MdC, Segura-Egea JJ, Díaz-Cuenca A. Higher hydration performance and bioactive response of the new endodontic bioactive cement MTA HP repair compared with ProRoot MTA white and NeoMTA plus. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2019;107(6):2109–2120. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Khalil & Eid (2013).Khalil W, Eid N. Biocompatibility of bio aggregate and mineral trioxide aggregate on the liver and kidney. International Endodontic Journal. 2013;46(8):730–737. doi: 10.1111/iej.12050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kharouf et al. (2021).Kharouf N, Zghal J, Addiego F, Gabelout M, Jmal H, Haïkel Y, Bahlouli N, Ball V. Tannic acid speeds up the setting of mineral trioxide aggregate cements and improves its surface and bulk properties. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2021;589:318–326. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.12.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Laghios et al. (2000).Laghios C, Benson B, Gutmann J, Cutler CW. Comparative radiopacity of tetracalcium phosphate and other root-end filling materials. International Endodontic Journal. 2000;33(4):311–315. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu, Wang & Dong (2015).Liu S, Wang S, Dong Y. Evaluation of a bioceramic as a pulp capping agent in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Endodontics. 2015;41(5):652–657. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lodiene et al. (2008).Lodiene G, Morisbak E, Bruzell E, Ørstavik D. Toxicity evaluation of root canal sealers in vitro. International Endodontic Journal. 2008;41(1):72–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01321.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lyapina et al. (2015).Lyapina M, Yaneva-Deliverska M, Deliversky J, Kisselova A. European and international standards on medical devices for dentistry. Journal of IMAB—Annual Proceeding Scientific Papers. 2015;21(1):713–717. doi: 10.5272/jimab.2015211.713. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Nowicka et al. (2013).Nowicka A, Lipski M, Parafiniuk M, Sporniak-Tutak K, Lichota D, Kosierkiewicz A, Kaczmarek W, Buczkowska-Radlińska J. Response of human dental pulp capped with biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate. Journal of Endodontics. 2013;39(6):743–747. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Öznurhan, Kayabasi & Keskus (2020).Öznurhan F, Kayabasi M, Keskus B. Evaluation of long-term results of two different calcium silicate based materials in primary molar teeth vital pulpotomies: an invivo study. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. 2020;23(1):45–51. doi: 10.7126/cumudj.648723. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Parirokh & Torabinejad (2010).Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review—part III: clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. Journal of Endodontics. 2010;36(3):400–413. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Poggio et al. (2014).Poggio C, Ceci M, Beltrami R, Dagna A, Colombo M, Chiesa M. Biocompatibility of a new pulp capping cement. Annali di Stomatologia. 2014;5(2):69–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Polyzois, Dahl & Hensten-Pettersen (1995).Polyzois GL, Dahl JE, Hensten-Pettersen A. Biological testing of dental materials: development of national and international standards. Journal of Biomaterials Applications. 1995;9(4):355–362. doi: 10.1177/088532829500900403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rajasekharan et al. (2017).Rajasekharan S, Martens LC, Vandenbulcke J, Jacquet W, Bottenberg P, Cauwels R. Efficacy of three different pulpotomy agents in primary molars: a randomized control trial. International Endodontic Journal. 2017;50(3):215–228. doi: 10.1111/iej.12619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramos et al. (2016).Ramos JC, Palma PJ, Nascimento R, Caramelo F, Messias A, Vinagre A, Santos JM. 1-year in vitro evaluation of tooth discoloration induced by 2 calcium silicate—based cements. Journal of Endodontics. 2016;42(9):1403–1407. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Silva et al. (2017).Silva G, Guerreiro-Tanomaru J, Da Fonseca T, Bernardi MIB, Sasso-Cerri E, Tanomaru-Filho M, Cerri P. Zirconium oxide and niobium oxide used as radiopacifiers in a calcium silicate-based material stimulate fibroblast proliferation and collagen formation. International Endodontic Journal. 2017;50:e95–e108. doi: 10.1111/iej.12789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Simsek et al. (2016).Simsek N, Bulut ET, Ahmetoğlu F, Alan H. Determination of trace elements in rat organs implanted with endodontic repair materials by ICP-MS. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2016;27(3):1–6. doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5663-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Slompo et al. (2015).Slompo C, Peres-Buzalaf C, Gasque KCdS, Damante CA, Ordinola-Zapata R, Duarte MAH, Oliveira RCD. Experimental calcium silicate-based cement with and without zirconium oxide modulates fibroblasts viability. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2015;26:587–591. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201300316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Standardization IOF (2018).Standardization IOF Dentistry-evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry: ISO 2018.
  • Sun et al. (2013).Sun B, Zuo Y, Li J, Wang L, Tang K, Huang D, Du J, Luo P, Li Y. High conversion self-curing sealer based on a novel injectable polyurethane system for root canal filling. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2013;33(6):3138–3145. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tanomaru-Filho et al. (2017).Tanomaru-Filho M, Andrade A, Rodrigues EM, Viola KS, Faria G, Camilleri J, Guerreiro-Tanomaru J. Biocompatibility and mineralized nodule formation of Neo MTA Plus and an experimental tricalcium silicate cement containing tantalum oxide. International Endodontic Journal. 2017;50:e31–e39. doi: 10.1111/iej.12780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tomás-Catalá et al. (2018).Tomás-Catalá CJ, Collado-González M, García-Bernal D, Onate-Sánchez RE, Forner L, Llena C, Lozano A, Moraleda JM, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ. Biocompatibility of new pulp-capping materials NeoMTA Plus, MTA Repair HP, and Biodentine on human dental pulp stem cells. Journal of Endodontics. 2018;44(1):126–132. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tomás-Catalá et al. (2017).Tomás-Catalá C, Collado-González M, García-Bernal D, Oñate Sánchez R, Forner L, Llena C, Lozano A, Castelo-Baz P, Moraleda JM, Rodríguez-Lozano F. Comparative analysis of the biological effects of the endodontic bioactive cements MTA-Angelus, MTA repair HP and NeoMTA plus on human dental pulp stem cells. International Endodontic Journal. 2017;50:e63–e72. doi: 10.1111/iej.12859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Torabinejad, Parirokh & Dummer (2018).Torabinejad M, Parirokh M, Dummer PM. Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview—part II: other clinical applications and complications. International Endodontic Journal. 2018;51(3):284–317. doi: 10.1111/iej.12843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tran et al. (2012).Tran X, Gorin C, Willig C, Baroukh B, Pellat B, Decup F, Opsahl Vital S, Chaussain C, Boukpessi T. Effect of a calcium-silicate-based restorative cement on pulp repair. Journal of Dental Research. 2012;91(12):1166–1171. doi: 10.1177/0022034512460833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xing et al. (2012).Xing H, Bu W, Ren Q, Zheng X, Li M, Zhang S, Qu H, Wang Z, Hua Y, Zhao K, Zhou L, Peng W, Shi J. A NaYbF4: Tm3+ nanoprobe for CT and NIR-to-NIR fluorescent bimodal imaging. Biomaterials. 2012;33(21):5384–5393. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Author Checklist.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15376/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Raw Data.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15376/supp-2

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are available in the Supplementary File.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES