Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2023 Jun 12;25(Suppl 1):i71–i72. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noad073.276

MDB-44. A TRANSFER LEARNING APPROACH FOR AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION OF TUMOR SUB-COMPARTMENTS AND TUMOR HABITAT IN PEDIATRIC MEDULLOBLASTOMA

Rohan Bareja 1, Marwa Ismail 2, Doug Martin 3, Ameya Nayate 4, Ipsa Yadav 5, Murad Labbad 6, Benita Tamrazi 7, Ralph Salloum 8, Ashley Margol 9, Alexander Judkins 10, Sukanya Iyer 11, Peter de Blank 12, Pallavi Tiwari 13
PMCID: PMC10260007

Abstract

PURPOSE

Accurate delineation of pediatric medulloblastoma (MB) tumors is required for accurate surgical resection and efficient treatment planning. However, manual delineation is time consuming and prone to errors and inter-reader variability. We present the first attempt at automatic segmentation of MB tumors via a transfer learning approach that utilizes adult brain tumor segmentations to optimize segmentation of 1) the pediatric tumor habitat, comprising enhancing tumor (ET), necrosis/non-enhancing tumor (NET), and edema sub-compartments, and 2) the individual tumor sub-compartments.

METHODS

Our cohort consisted of 300 adult tumor MRI scans (BRATS) and 78 pediatric MB scans (46 training, 32 testing) with Gd-T1w, T2w, and FLAIR protocols. Training set subjects were collected from Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles (N=18) and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (N=28), whereas test set subjects were collected from Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Preprocessing included age-specific atlas registration, skull stripping, and bias correction. Then, using nnUnet framework, we trained 3D- deep learning U-net models on BRATS dataset for the tumor sub-compartments: ET, edema, and NET + necrosis, as well as the tumor habitat. Our initial learning rate was 0.01, with stochastic gradient descent as optimizer, and an average of dice loss and cross-entropy loss as the loss function. We then performed transfer learning using Models Genesis on the pediatric subjects.

RESULTS

Our segmentation model yielded mean dice scores of 0.87± .02 for tumor habitat, .83± .04 for ET, .742±.05 for edema, and .54±.11 for NET + necrosis, across fivefold cross-validation runs. For test set, our model yielded mean dice scores of 0.80 for the tumor habitat, 0.67 for ET, 0.54 for edema, and 0.28 for NET + necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Our transfer learning model shows promise in accurate automatic delineation of the MB tumor habitat and its individual sub-compartments, towards efficient surgical and treatment planning in MB tumors.


Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES