Skip to main content
Parasitology logoLink to Parasitology
. 2023 Mar 9;150(6):498–504. doi: 10.1017/S0031182023000185

Surveillance of avian malaria and related haemoparasites in common terns (Sterna hirundo) on the Atlantic coast of South America

Sofía Capasso 1,, Yvonne R Schumm 2, Petra Quillfeldt 2, Claire Bonsergent 3, Laurence Malandrin 3, Eliana Lorenti 1, Bruno Fusaro 1,4, Guillermo Panisse 1, Melina Lunardelli 5, Gabriel Castresana 5, Julia I Diaz 1
PMCID: PMC10260293  PMID: 36892015

graphic file with name S0031182023000185_figAb.jpg

Keywords: Argentine Atlantic coast, avian blood parasites, Charadriiformes, cytochrome b gene, migratory birds, Plasmodium

Abstract

Haemosporidia (Apicomplexa, Haemosporida) are protozoa that infect vertebrate blood cells and are transmitted by vectors. Among vertebrates, birds possess the greatest diversity of haemosporidia, historically placed in 3 genera: Haemoproteus, Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium, the causative agent of avian malaria. In South America, existing data on haemosporidia are spatially and temporally dispersed, so increased surveillance is needed to improve the determination and diagnosis of these parasites. During the non-breeding season in 2020 and 2021, 60 common terns (Sterna hirundo) were captured and bled as part of ongoing research on the population health of migratory birds on the Argentinian Atlantic coast. Blood samples and blood smears were obtained. Fifty-eight samples were screened for Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon, as well as for Babesia parasites by nested polymerase chain reaction and by microscopic examination of smears. Two positive samples for Plasmodium were found. The cytochrome b lineages detected in the present study are found for the first time, and are close to Plasmodium lineages found in other bird orders. The low prevalence (3.6%) of haemoparasites found in this research was similar to those reported for previous studies on seabirds, including Charadriiformes. Our findings provide new information about the distribution and prevalence of haemosporidian parasites from charadriiforms in the southernmost part of South America, which remains understudied.

Introduction

Wetland ecosystems harbour a wide variety of species including different parasites that often go undetected. This can negatively affect the viability of wildlife populations. The detection of parasites and pathogens is important for the identification of endemic as well as exotic diseases, in order to know the host population's health status, the pressures they face and the actions that can be developed for their conservation and management (Lebarbenchon et al., 2008). Wild birds are important natural reservoirs and potential dispersers of a wide variety of parasites (Kruse et al., 2004; Chang et al., 2020). In particular, migratory birds represent a basic mechanism in the emergence of new sources of infection at great distances from their original areas (or endemic areas) (Koprivnikar and Leung, 2015).

Among avian endoparasites, haemosporidians (Apicomplexa, Haemosporida) are protozoans that infect vertebrate blood cells and are transmitted by vectors (haematophagous dipterans). A great diversity of haemosporidian species were reported in birds, represented in 3 genera: Haemoproteus (containing 2 subgenera Haemoproteus and Parahaemoproteus), Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium, the aetiological agent of avian malaria (Bell et al., 2020). These parasites are globally distributed in most bird families, and the rates of infection and prevalence are variable depending on the bird order (Quillfeldt et al., 2011). Although it is assumed that avian haemosporidian infections are relatively benign in wild populations, the study of these parasites is important because they can affect host fitness, in some cases cause severe pathology (tissue necrosis, haemorrhages and anaemia) and usually mortality is difficult to detect (Valkiūnas, 2005; Palinauskas et al., 2013; Groff et al., 2019).

The avifauna of South America supports a high diversity of haemosporidians, whose distribution is strongly associated with its complex biogeography (Fecchio et al., 2019). However, most of the studies focused on passerine hosts, reflecting the need for sampling and describing avian haemosporidian parasites in non-passerine hosts (Bell et al., 2020).

Other blood parasites of concern in birds are piroplasmids of the genus Babesia, a protozoan parasite causing babesiosis, an emerging and potentially zoonotic disease transmitted by ticks. Symptoms may include anaemia, leucocytosis and depressed liver function (Ebani and Mancianti, 2021). By now, only the species Babesia shortii is known to cause pathogenicity in birds (Khan et al., 2019). Currently, studies that focus on avian Babesia from seabirds in South America are scarce (Quillfeldt et al., 2014).

The order Charadriiformes contains 19 families and 384 species (del Hoyo et al., 1996), most of them being seabirds and shorebirds. They have a cosmopolitan distribution and are usually associated with seas, rivers and wetlands (del Hoyo et al., 1996). Among Charadriiformes seabirds, representatives of the family Laridae (gulls, terns and skimmers) are widely distributed. They are mostly coastal; some are pelagic or can inhabit inland environments (Winkler et al., 2020). Within this family, the most studied species in the Northern Hemisphere is the common tern (Sterna hirundo) (Burger and Gochfeld, 1991). Common terns breed in most of Europe, Asia and North America, and undertake long-distance migratory movements to the Southern Hemisphere during the non-breeding season. They have extremely large population sizes, and are listed as Least Concern (IUCN, 2019). However, they are vulnerable to habitat deterioration and loss (del Hoyo et al., 1996). There is less information available about this species in its wintering grounds in the Western Hemisphere (South America). The southernmost sightings were made in Argentina (Mauco et al., 2001; Yorio, 2005), mostly on the Atlantic coast of Buenos Aires, which constitutes the largest roosting area of the common tern in South America (30 000 birds recorded at Punta Rasa) (Hays et al., 1997; Mauco et al., 2001).

The MalAvi database contains only 47 genetic haemosporidian lineages recovered from wild Charadriiformes (MalAvi database, accessed on 16 January 2023), and there is currently 1 record (i.e. Leucocytozoon sp.) in common terns (Włodarczyk et al., 2022). This paucity of information is probably due to the apparent absence or scarcity of blood parasites in certain groups of birds such as seabirds and shorebirds (Quillfeldt et al., 2010; Soares et al., 2016). Published information shows that of 113 seabird species studied, in only 27% haematozoan infections were found. Specifically, in the case of the family Laridae, 59% of the species studied were infected with at least 1 haemoparasitic species, mostly by Haemoproteus (Quillfeldt et al., 2011). There are some previous studies focusing on haemosporidia in charadriiforms from Argentina. In shorebirds for example, 2 studies reported negative results (D'Amico et al., 2007, 2008) and only 1 reported 1% of prevalence (Soares et al., 2016). In the case of larids, the only positives have been found in Malvinas Islands from the dolphin gull (Larus scoresbii) (Quillfeldt et al., 2010); the other study has shown negative results (Jovani et al., 2001).

Migratory movements can expose host populations to novel parasites as well as introduce parasites into new geographic areas (Koprivnikar and Leung, 2015). Therefore, it is of interest to explore parasitic species in migratory birds in South America, to increase their detection and to contribute to the knowledge of their diversity, with the ultimate goal of determining parasite–host distribution patterns. The aims of the present study were (i) to assess the prevalence of the Haemosporida (Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon) as well as Babesia spp. in common terns from Punta Rasa, their most important wintering site in Argentina, (ii) to identify the genetic diversity of haematozoa parasites and (iii) to compare the genetic relationships among haematozoa haplotypes in Charadriiformes from South America to those identified in previous investigations.

Materials and methods

Study area and sample collection

Fieldwork was conducted during the non-breeding season between December 2020 and April 2021, in Punta Rasa, on the Atlantic coast of Argentina (Fig. 1). Punta Rasa is located in Samborombon Bay in the Río de La Plata estuary (36°17′22.8″ S; 56°46′52.9″ W) and is used by several shorebirds (e.g. sandpipers, plovers and oystercatchers) and marine birds (e.g. skimmers, terns and gulls) as roosting and feeding areas during the non-breeding season (Mauco et al., 2001). Birds were caught in January 2020 and February and March of 2021 using canon nets (permit number DI-2019-241). Blood samples of maximum 75 μL were collected by brachial venepuncture and stored on blotting paper (Biodynamics SRL, Buenos Aires, Argentina). Blood samples on the blotting paper were stored in the dark and at room temperature in separate tubes to avoid cross-contamination until DNA isolation. For each bird, 2 thin smears on microscope slides were made. Blood films were air dried immediately in the field, and then fixed with absolute methanol and stained with Giemsa in a working solution prepared with phosphate buffer pH 7.0 (ratio 1:5) for 30 min in the laboratory.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Common tern sampling location in Argentina. Arrows in orange indicate the migratory route of the species in South America.

Blood parasite detection

Haemosporidians

The presence or absence of avian haemosporidians was determined through nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) through amplification of the mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) gene. Total DNA was extracted using the ammonium-acetate DNA precipitation protocol (Martínez et al., 2009). DNA was obtained from 58 of the 60 birds sampled. NanoDrop2000c UV-Vis spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, USA) was used to measure the DNA concentration after extraction. If the DNA concentration was higher than 80 ng μL−1, samples were diluted to 20 ng μL−1. In addition, we tested the quality of the DNA by performing the PCR sexing, resulting in 97% of the samples successfully sexed. Molecular sexing was performed following the protocol of Quintana et al. (2008). An initial PCR was run with the primer pair HaemNFI/HaemNR3 [see Hellgren et al. (2004) for cycling conditions]. An aliquot of this PCR product was subsequently used as template DNA for the second PCR with specific primer pairs HaemF/HaemR2 for Haemoproteus and Plasmodium cytb gene amplification (Bensch et al., 2000), and HaemFL/HaemR2L for Leucocytozoon cytb amplification (Hellgren et al., 2004). The PCRs with HaemF/HaemR2 and HaemFL/HaemR2L consisted of 25 μL reaction volumes containing 4 μL DNA template, 1.65 μL of each primer (10 mm), 12.5 μL of DreamTaq Master-Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) and 5.2 μL of nuclease-free water. Samples of different species of Columbiformes with known infections have been used as positive controls in each PCR run (Schumm et al., 2021). Negative controls [template replaced with double-distilled water (ddH2O)] were included in runs to check for possible contamination. Then, PCR products of the samples were visualized using QIAxcel Advanced (Qiagen, Hombrechtikon, Switzerland) high-resolution capillary gel electrophoresis. A positive PCR result was interpreted as an infected bird, and positive samples were Sanger sequenced bidirectionally by Microsynth-Seqlab (Sequence Laboratories Goettingen GmbH, Göttingen, Germany). For the new lineages, PCR and sequencing were performed twice to verify the results. The new cytb sequences were deposited in GenBank under the corresponding accession numbers.

To confirm the presence or absence of intracellular parasite gametocytes, smears (n = 120) were double-blind scanned by microscopic examination at ×1000 magnification using a light microscope (PrimoStar Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany).

Piroplasms

Detection of piroplasms was performed by nested PCR on the 18S rRNA gene following the protocol previously developed for the detection of Babesia in yellow-legged gull's (Larus michahellis) blood (Bonsergent et al., 2022). Primers 18SBp_fw and 18SBp_rev and BAB-GF2 and BAB-GR2 were used in 2 different nested PCRs to amplify the expected fragments of 1529 and 560 bp, respectively, after a primary amplification with CRYPTOF and CRYPTOR primers (Malandrin et al., 2010). A positive control was included in each run to ensure the PCR had worked properly. A Babesia infecting human, Babesia sp. FR1, was used in the first PCR as a PCR success control. The use of genomic DNA from a Babesia species not infective for birds allows the identification of eventual sample contaminations from the positive control, after sequencing. Babesia sp. YLG genomic DNA was used as a positive control in the second PCR. Negative controls (template replaced with ddH2O) were included in runs to check for possible PCR contamination.

Phylogenetic analyses

The forward and reverse sequences of the cytb fragment were assembled and trimmed in CLC Main Workbench 7.6.4 (CLC Bio, Qiagen, Denmark). To identify haemosporidian lineages, an online BLAST (National Center for Biotechnology Information) using BLASTN 2.3.0+ (Zhang et al., 2000) was performed in the MalAvi database (Bensch et al., 2009). The resulting reference sequences were aligned with our sequences and trimmed to MalAvi sequence length (479 bp) using the program BioEdit (Hall, 1999). Sequences were considered as distinct lineages if they differ by 1 or more nucleotides. Lineages with no database records in MalAvi were considered as novel, and new MalAvi names were assigned.

Constructions of lineage networks for Plasmodium, using the median-joining network method were performed with PopART 1.7 (Bandelt et al., 1999; Leigh and Bryant, 2015) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Taxa included in the median-joining network of mitochondrial cytb gene lineages of Plasmodium spp.

Lineage (MalAvi) Host Locality GenBank accession no. Reference
BT7 Parkesia noveboracensis (Passeriformes: Parulidae) USA MF817784 Smith et al. (2018)
FALTIN14 Falco tinnunculus (Falconiformes: Falconidae) China MT281523 Huang et al. (2020)
PARUS67 Parus major (Passeriformes: Paridae) Sweden KU695264 Dubiec et al. (2016)
SFC6 Muscicapa striata (Passeriformes: Muscicapidae) Europe DQ368389 Pérez-Tris et al. (2007)
TURDUS1 Cyanistes caeruleus (Passeriformes: Paridae) Europe HQ537478 Szöllősi et al. (2011)

Results

Of the 58 samples, we obtained quality DNA in 56 samples. After PCR assay, we found 2 positive samples (3.6%), and there were no double infections. Only Plasmodium infections were detected, and no Haemoproteus- or Leucocytozoon-positive samples were found. We obtained sequences of 501 and 499 bp for the positive samples. Then sequences were assembled and edited, resulting in 479 bp fragments.

We identified 2 new Plasmodium lineages, named STEHIR01 (accession number ON872158) and STEHIR02 (accession number ON872159), which differ in 1 and 2 nucleotides from their closest MalAvi match PARUS67, respectively (Fig. 2). BLASTN analysis from MalAvi database revealed an identity of 99% with the Plasmodium lineages TURDUS1, BT7 (representing the morphospecies Plasmodium circumflexum), SFC6, PARUS67 and FALTIN14. The 2 new lineages appear phylogenetically clustered with Plasmodium lineages isolated from other bird orders such as Passeriformes, Charadriiformes, Strigiformes, Falconiformes and Anseriformes (Fig. 2). Despite positive PCR, we did not detect haemoparasites in the corresponding blood smears.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Median-joining network of mitochondrial cytb gene lineages of Plasmodium spp. (the 2 lineages found in the present study and the first 5 reference lineages from MalAvi, all of 479 bp, are presented in Table 1). Circles represent distinct genetic lineages, and the circle sizes are proportional to the lineage frequencies. One hatch mark represents 1 mutation. Lineage names are noted at the associated circles.

The amplification of partial 18S rRNA genes using BAB-GF2 and BAB-GR2 and 18SBp_fw and 18SBp_rev primers resulted in amplicons of non-expected sizes, most probably corresponding to non-specific primer hybridization. Sequencing and BLASTN analyses were performed on, respectively, 3 and 2 of the amplicons and confirmed non-specific amplifications. Neither Babesia sp. YLG nor other Babesia/Theileria piroplasms were detected in common terns' blood samples of this study.

Discussion

Members of the Laridae family have been reported as carriers of haemoparasites in South America, such as the black skimmer (Rynchops niger) and the brown noddy (Anous stolidus) from Brazil, the swallow-tailed gull (Creagrus furcatus) from Galapagos, Ecuador and the dolphin gull from Malvinas Islands, Argentina (Quillfeldt et al., 2010, 2014; Levin et al., 2011; Roos et al., 2015). However, these lineages from Laridae are not genetically close to the new lineages found in the present study (see Supplementary information Figs S1 and S2). In the common tern there are only 2 previous studies on the subject from the Americas. One was performed at the breeding sites in the northeastern USA showing the absence of haemoparasites. This was only carried out by screening blood smears (Fiorello et al., 2009). The second one is a checklist of avian blood parasites from North America reporting 0% prevalence in the common tern by blood smears screening (Greiner et al., 1975). Recently, haemosporidians of the genus Leucocytozoon have been reported in common terns from Europe, but with low prevalence (<0.5%), and no Plasmodium positives were found (Włodarczyk et al., 2022).

In accordance with previous seabird studies (e.g. Fiorello et al., 2009; Quillfeldt et al., 2011; Campioni et al., 2018; Ilahiane et al., 2022; Roldán-Zurabián et al., 2022) haemosporidian prevalence in the common tern from the Argentinean coast was low. Avian Plasmodium species are distributed worldwide except in Antarctica, but only 3 species, Plasmodium relictum, Plasmodium reticulum and Plasmodium matutinum, have been detected in wild seabirds, the former being the most common species in birds (Quillfeldt et al., 2011; Włodarczyk et al., 2022). In our study, the new Plasmodium lineages differ in 1 and 2 nucleotides from their closest matching lineage PARUS67 that was found in the great tit (Parus major) and the marsh tit (Parus palustris) (Dubiec et al., 2016; Ellis et al., 2020). This can indicate a recent divergence during a host switching process. At the same time, as we were not able to observe gametocytes in the blood smears, this finding could represent an abortive malaria infection. This happens when a parasite invades a host, but cannot complete its full life cycle and be transmitted to the vector as gametocytes are absent in the blood (Palinauskas et al., 2016).

Other shorebirds and seabirds were analysed for haemoparasites in the Argentinean coast. For example, Jovani et al. (2001) analysed blood smears of 560 birds from 13 avian species, and no haemoparasites were detected. Martinez-Abrain et al. (2004) discussed different reasons for the apparent lack or lower presence of blood parasites in some avian species. Despite the more common explanation being the absence or scarcity of parasite vectors in some habitats, there are contradictions which show that it is not a universal explanation, and that other factors (e.g. immunological capabilities of the host, absence of the right host–parasite–vector assemblage) could be operating (Martinez-Abrain et al., 2004). Methodological weaknesses also could be influencing. According to our results and those from previous authors (e.g. Quillfeldt et al., 2010), PCR analyses are needed to avoid false negatives. This is because PCR screening techniques are reliable for detecting low intensity infections and are able to identify infections with low levels of parasitaemia that are not visible on smears (Durrant et al., 2006).

It is difficult to establish where birds could have been infected, since they are inter-continental migrants, and avian Plasmodium parasites are found worldwide. Therefore, addressing transmission in the avian malaria system turns out to be challenging. Also, in the North–South American migratory route, migratory and resident host species share the same habitats, therefore Plasmodium spp. lineages can switch easily between a wide range of hosts (Ricklefs et al., 2017).

Many species of avian Plasmodium use Culicidae mosquitoes belonging to different genera for completing sporogony and transmission (Valkiunas and Iezhova, 2018). Two hundred and twelve species of Culicidae mosquitoes have been recorded in Argentina. From these species, 39.75% are found in the centre of the country (Stein et al., 2016). This includes Buenos Aires province, where the present study was conducted. In 2010, 2 cases of lethal avian malaria were confirmed in Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus). Birds were in permanent captivity in San Clemente del Tuyú (36°20′17″ S; 56°45′14″ W), the same area as the sampling site of the present study. Identifications were made by blood smears resulting in 3 species: Plasmodium (Haemamoeba) tejerai, Plasmodium (Huffia) sp. and Plasmodium (Novyella) sp. (Vanstreels et al., 2016). This indicates a chance for haemoparasitic infection at this site, but further investigations are needed in order to investigate the local transmission of avian blood parasites.

Several tick species have been proposed to transmit Babesia to different seabird species. They are particularly exposed to nidicolous vectors during the breeding season, given the abundance of hard or soft ticks in their colonies. In addition, it is not yet well understood whether Babesia species are highly host-specific (Bonsergent et al., 2022). Although the common terns nest on the ground, in open areas with loose substrate and with scattered vegetation, which can increase the chances of encountering ticks, we do not have sufficient information to explain the absence of Babesia in the common terns tested. More studies of seabirds are required to understand the parasitic dynamics and transmission ecology of Babesia species.

In summary, we report for the first time Plasmodium from wild migratory seabirds from Argentina, the first report of a Plasmodium in the common tern, and the second report of Plasmodium from wild seabirds from the temperate region of South America (Quillfeldt et al., 2010). The results presented here show that in the southernmost part of South America the role of wild birds (especially non-passerines) in the spread of haemoparasites remains speculative, and may change over time. In this sense, this kind of studies requires urgent attention. Increasing surveillance will allow a better understanding of parasite transmission at sites frequented by birds.

Acknowledgements

We thank all rangers from Reserva Natural Punta Rasa who assisted with fieldwork, and Sabine Wagner for her contribution in laboratory work. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers as well as the editor, for the helpful comments on the manuscript.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182023000185.

S0031182023000185sup001.docx (217.4KB, docx)

click here to view supplementary material

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. Raw data are available from the corresponding and first author.

Author's contribution

S. C. conceived and designed research. S. C., E. L., B. F., G. P., M. L. and G. C. carried out the samplings. S. C., Y. R. S., P. Q., C. B. and L. M. determined the parasites and analysed data. S. C., Y. R. S., P. Q., C. B., L. M. and J. I. D. contributed to the results and discussion as well as writing of both the draft and final versions of the manuscript. J. I. D. supervised the project. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Financial support

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this research by the following agencies: Universidad Nacional de La Plata (J. I. D., grant number N859), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (J. I. D., grant number PIP-1787 and PUE CEPAVE), German Academic Exchange Services (DAAD to S. C.), Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (S. C., grant number PICT-2019-3115) and Organismo Provincial para el Desarrollo Sostenible (Ministerio de Ambiente, Buenos Aires province).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.

Ethical standards

All samples taken from birds were in compliance with all appropriate research permissions (permit number DI-2019-241) provided by Organismo Provincial para el Desarrollo Sostenible (Dirección de Áreas Protegidas, Ministerio de Ambiente, Buenos Aires province, Argentina).

References

  1. Bandelt H, Forster P and Röhl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16, 37–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell JA, González-Acuña D and Tkach VV (2020) Haemosporidian parasites of Chilean ducks: the importance of biogeography and nonpasserine hosts. Journal of Parasitology 106, 211–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bensch S, Stjernman M, Hasselquist H, Ostman O, Hansson B, Westerdahl H and Pinheiro RT (2000) Host specificity in avian blood parasites: a study of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus mitochondrial DNA amplified from birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267, 1583–1589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bensch S, Hellgren O and Pérez-Tris J (2009) MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Molecular Ecology Resources 9, 1353–1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonsergent C, Vittecoq M, Leray C, Burkart L, McCoy KD and Malandrin L (2022) Characterization and diversity of Babesia sp. YLG, a new member of the Peircei group infecting Mediterranean yellow-legged gulls (Larus michahellis). Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases 13, 101852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burger J and Gochfeld M (1991) The Common Tern: Its Breeding Biology and Social Behavior. New York, USA: Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Campioni L, Martínez-de la Puente J, Figuerola J, Granadeiro JP, Silva MC and Catry P (2018) Absence of haemosporidian parasite infections in the long-lived Cory's shearwater: evidence from molecular analyses and review of the literature. Parasitology Research 117, 323–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang WS, Eden JS, Hall J, Shi M, Rose K and Holmes EC (2020) Meta-transcriptomic analysis of virus diversity in urban wild birds with paretic disease. Journal of Virology 94, e00606-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. D'amico VL, Bertellotti M, Baker AJ and Diaz LA (2007) Exposure of red knots (Calidris canutus rufa) to select avian pathogens; Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 43, 794–797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. D'Amico VL, Bertellotti MN, Baker AJ, Junior WT and González PM (2008) Migration strategies of wintering populations of red knots Calidris canutus rufa in South America: the role of parasite pressure. Ardeola 55, 193–202. [Google Scholar]
  11. del Hoyo J, Elliott A and Sargatal J (eds) (1996) Handbook of the Birds of the World. Volume 3: Hoatzin to Auks. Barcelona, España: Lynx Edicions, 821pp. ISBN: 8487334202. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dubiec A, Podmokła E, Zagalska-Neubauer M, Drobniak SM, Arct A, Gustafsson L and Cichoń M (2016) Differential prevalence and diversity of haemosporidian parasites in two sympatric closely related non-migratory passerines. Parasitology 143, 1320–1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Durrant KL, Beadell JS, Ishtiaq F, Graves GR, Olson SL, Gering E, Peirce MA, Milensky CM, Schmidt BK, Gebhard C and Fleischer RC (2006) Avian hematozoa in South America: a comparison of temperate and tropical zones. Ornithological Monographs 60, 98–111. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ebani VV and Mancianti F (2021) Potential role of avian populations in the epidemiology of Rickettsia spp. and Babesia spp. Veterinary Sciences 8, 334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellis VA, Huang X, Westerdahl H, Jönsson J, Hasselquist D, Neto JM, Nilsson JA, Nilsson J, Hegemann A, Hellgren O and Bensch S (2020) Explaining prevalence, diversity and host specificity in a community of avian haemosporidian parasites. Oikos 129, 1314–1329. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fecchio A, Bell JA, Pinheiro RB, Cueto VR, Gorosit OCA, Lutz HL, Gaiotti MG, Paiva LV, França LF, Toledo-Lima G, Tolentino M, Pinho JB, Tkach VV, Fontana CS, Grande JM, Santillán MA, Caparroz R, Roos AL, Bessa R, Nogueira W, Moura T, Nolasco EC, Comiche KJM, Kirchgatter K, Guimarães LO, Dispoto JH, Marini MA, Weckstein JD, Batalha-Filho H and Collins MD (2019) Avian host composition, local speciation and dispersal drive the regional assembly of avian malaria parasites in South American birds. Molecular Ecology 28, 2681–2693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fiorello CV, Nisbet IC, Hatch JJ, Corsiglia C and Pokras MA (2009) Hematology and absence of hemoparasites in breeding common terns (Sterna hirundo) from Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 40, 409–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Greiner EC, Bennett GF, White EM and Coombs RF (1975) Distribution of the avian hematozoa of North America. Canadian Journal of Zoology 53, 1762–1787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Groff TC, Lorenz TJ, Crespo R, Iezhova T, Valkiūnas G and Sehgal RN (2019) Haemoproteosis lethality in a woodpecker, with molecular and morphological characterization of Haemoproteus velans (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae). International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 10, 93–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hays H, Di Costanzo J, Cormons G, Antas PDTZ, do Nascimento JLX, do Nascimento IDLS and Bremer RE (1997) Recoveries of roseate and common terns in South America (Recobro de Individuos de Sterna dougallii y S. hirundo en Sur América). Journal of Field Ornithology 68, 79–90. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hellgren O, Waldenström J and Bensch S (2004) A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. Journal of Parasitology 90, 797–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang X, Huang D, Liang Y, Zhang L, Yang G, Liu PY, Deng W and Dong L (2020) A new protocol for absolute quantification of haemosporidian parasites in raptors and comparison with current assays. Parasites & Vectors 13, 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ilahiane L, De Pascalis F, Pisu D, Pala D, Ferrario F, Cucco M, Rubolini D, Cacere JC and Pellegrino I (2022) No evidence of avian malaria in two Mediterranean endemic seabirds. Marine Ornithology 50, 13–17. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jovani R, Tella JL, Forero MG, Bertellotti M, Blanco G, Ceballos O and Donázar JA (2001) Apparent absence of blood parasites in the Patagonian seabird community: is it related to the marine environment? Waterbirds 24, 430–433. [Google Scholar]
  26. Khan JS, Provencher JF, Forbes MR, Mallory ML, Lebarbenchon C and McCoy KD (2019) Parasites of seabirds: a survey of effects and ecological implications. Advances in Marine Biology 82, 1–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Koprivnikar J and Leung TL (2015) Flying with diverse passengers: greater richness of parasitic nematodes in migratory birds. Oikos 124, 399–405. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kruse H, Kirkemo AM and Handeland K (2004) Wildlife as source of zoonotic infections. Emerging Infectious Diseases 10, 2067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lebarbenchon C, Brown SP, Poulin R, Gauthier-Clerc M and Thomas F (2008) Evolution of pathogens in a man-made world. Molecular Ecology 17, 475–484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leigh JW and Bryant D (2015) PopART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6, 1110–1116. [Google Scholar]
  31. Levin II, Valkiūnas G, Santiago-Alarcon D, Cruz LL, Iezhova TA, O'Brien SL, Hailer F, Dearborn D, Schreiber EA, Fleischer RC, Ricklefs RE and Parker PG (2011) Hippoboscid-transmitted Haemoproteus parasites (Haemosporida) infect Galapagos Pelecaniform birds: evidence from molecular and morphological studies, with a description of Haemoproteus iwa. International Journal for Parasitology 41, 1019–1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Malandrin L, Jouglin M, Sun Y, Brisseau N and Chauvin A (2010) Redescription of Babesia capreoli (Enigk and Friedhoff, 1962) from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): isolation, cultivation, host specificity, molecular characterisation and differentiation from Babesia divergens. International Journal for Parasitology 40, 277–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Martinez J, Martinez-de La Puente J, Herrero J, Del Cerro S, Lobato E, Aguilar JR, Vasquez RA and Merino S (2009) A restriction site to differentiate Plasmodium and Haemoproteus infections in birds: on the inefficiency of general primers for detection of mixed infections. Parasitology 136, 713–722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Martínez-Abraín A, Esparza B and Oro D (2004) Lack of blood parasites in bird species: does absence of blood parasite vectors explain it all. Ardeola 51, 225–232. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mauco L, Favero M and Bó MS (2001) Food and feeding biology of the common tern during the nonbreeding season in Samborombon Bay, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Waterbirds 24, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  36. Palinauskas V, Iezhova TA, Križanauskienė A, Markovets MY, Bensch S and Valkiūnas G (2013) Molecular characterization and distribution of Haemoproteus minutus (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae): a pathogenic avian parasite. Parasitology International 62, 358–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Palinauskas V, Žiegytė R, Iezhova TA, Ilgūnas M, Bernotienė R and Valkiūnas G (2016) Description, molecular characterisation, diagnostics and life cycle of Plasmodium elongatum (lineage pERIRUB01), the virulent avian malaria parasite. International Journal for Parasitology 46, 697–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pérez-Tris J, Hellgren O, Križanauskienė A, Waldenström J, Secondi J, Bonneaud C, Fjeldså J, Hasselquist H and Bensch S (2007) Within-host speciation of malaria parasites. PLoS ONE 2, e235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Quillfeldt P, Martínez J, Hennicke J, Ludynia K, Gladbach A, Masello JF, Riou S and Merino S (2010) Hemosporidian blood parasites in seabirds – a comparative genetic study of species from Antarctic to tropical habitats. Naturwissenschaften 97, 809–817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Quillfeldt P, Arriero E, Martínez J, Masello JF and Merino S (2011) Prevalence of blood parasites in seabirds – a review. Frontiers in Zoology 8, 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Quillfeldt P, Martinez J, Bugoni L, Mancini PL and Merino S (2014) Blood parasites in noddies and boobies from Brazilian offshore islands – differences between species and influence of nesting habitat. Parasitology 141, 399–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Quintana F, López G and Somoza G (2008) A cheap and quick method for DNA-based sexing of birds. Waterbirds 31, 485–488. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ricklefs RE, Medeiros M, Ellis VA, Svensson-Coelho M, Blake JG, Loiselle BA, Soares L, Fecchio A, Outlaw D, Marra PP, Latta SC, Valkiūnas G, Hellgren O and Bensch S (2017) Avian migration and the distribution of malaria parasites in New World passerine birds. Journal of Biogeography 44, 1113–1123. [Google Scholar]
  44. Roldán-Zurabián F, José Ruiz-López M, de la Puente JM, Figuerola J, Drummond H and Ancona S (2022) Apparent absence of avian malaria and malaria-like parasites in northern blue-footed boobies breeding on Isla Isabel. Scientific Reports 12, 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Roos FL, Belo NO, Silveira P and Braga EM (2015) Prevalence and diversity of avian malaria parasites in migratory black skimmers (Rynchops niger, Laridae, Charadriiformes) from the Brazilian Amazon Basin. Parasitology Research 114, 3903–3911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schumm YR, Bakaloudis D, Barboutis C, Cecere JG, Eraud C, Fischer D, Hering J, Hillerich K, Lormeé H, Mader V, Masello JF, Metzger B, Rocha G, Spina F and Quillfeldt P (2021) Prevalence and genetic diversity of avian haemosporidian parasites in wild bird species of the order Columbiformes. Parasitology Research 120, 1405–1420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Smith JD, Gill SA, Baker KM and Vonhof MJ (2018) Prevalence and diversity of avian Haemosporida infecting songbirds in southwest Michigan. Parasitology Research 117, 471–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Soares L, Escudero G, Penha VA and Ricklefs RE (2016) Low prevalence of haemosporidian parasites in shorebirds. Ardea 104, 129–141. [Google Scholar]
  49. Stein M, Rossi GC and Almirón WR (2016) Distribución geográfica de Culicidae de Argentina. In Berón CM, Campos, Gleiser RM, RE, Díaz Nieto L, Salomón OD and Schweigmann NJ (eds), Investigaciones Sobre Mosquitos en Argentina. Mar del Plata, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, pp. 47–56. [Google Scholar]
  50. Szöllősi E, Cichoń M, Eens M, Hasselquist D, Kempenaers B, Merino S, Nilsson JÅ, Rosivall B, Rytkönen S, Török J, Wood MJ and Garamszegi LZ (2011) Determinants of distribution and prevalence of avian malaria in blue tit populations across Europe: separating host and parasite effects. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24, 2014–2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Valkiūnas G (2005) Avian Malaria Parasites and Other Haemosporidia, 1st Edn. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 10.1201/9780203643792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Valkiūnas G and Iezhova TA (2018) Keys to the avian malaria parasites. Malaria Journal 17, 1–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Vanstreels RET, Capellino F, Silveira P, Braga ÉM, Rodríguez-Heredia SA, Loureiro J and Catão-Dias JL (2016) Avian malaria (Plasmodium spp.) in captive Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) from northern Argentina, 2010. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 52, 734–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Winkler DW, Billerman SM and Lovette IJ (2020) Gulls, terns, and skimmers (Laridae), version 1.0. In Billerman SM, Keeney BK, Rodewald PG and Schulenberg TS (eds), Birds of the World. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. [Google Scholar]
  55. Włodarczyk R, Bouwhuis S, Bichet C, Podlaszczuk P, Chyb A, Indykiewicz P, Dulisz B, Betleja J, Janiszewski T and Minias P (2022) Contrasting haemoparasite prevalence in larid species with divergent ecological niches and migration patterns. Parasitology 149, 1–29. 10.1017/S0031182022000920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yorio P (2005) Estado poblacional y de conservación de gaviotines y escúas que se reproducen en el litoral marítimo argentino. El Hornero 20, 75–93. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L and Miller W (2000) A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. Journal of Computational Biology 7, 203–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182023000185.

S0031182023000185sup001.docx (217.4KB, docx)

click here to view supplementary material

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. Raw data are available from the corresponding and first author.


Articles from Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES