Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Most centers have shifted to an extended day surgery (XDS ) model for urethroplasty. Our study characterizes outcomes and unplanned healthcare encounters of patients undergoing XDS urethroplasty compared to case-matched inpatient controls.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective, two-surgeon, single-center study of patients undergoing XDS urethroplasty (discharge <24 hrs) from November 2020 to November 2021. Patients were case-control matched based on age, stricture length, location, and etiology to patients who had previously undergone inpatient urethroplasty. Data was analyzed using descriptive and univariable statistics. Multivariable analysis by Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify associations with postoperative complications.
RESULTS
Ninety patients (mean age=53.8 years) underwent XDS urethroplasty during the study period. Mean stricture length was 4.4 cm (standard deviation [SD ] 2.4). Rates of postoperative complications were similar between XDS (17%, n=15) and admitted patients (21%, n=19), and XDS was not associated with increased risk on univariable analysis (odds ratio [OR ] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31–1.3, p=0.36). When stratifying by location, penile stricture (OR 4.21, 95% CI 1.3–13.8, p=0.02) and lichen sclerosus (OR 2.91, 95% CI 0.79–9.9, p=0.08) were associated with increased risk of postoperative complication. On multivariable analysis, only penile stricture was identified as significant (OR 4.78, 95% CI 1.2–19.4, p=0.03). Forty-eight percent (n=43) of patients had unplanned healthcare encounters postoperatively, with similar numbers of phone calls (n=37) and emergency department visits (n=36) between groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study shows that XDS urethroplasty is not associated with increased rates of complications relative to inpatient admission. This data supports using an XDS pathway for resource-efficient treatment of urethral strictures in a universal healthcare setting.
INTRODUCTION
Urethral stricture disease (USD ) is a condition caused by fibrosis and narrowing of the urethral lumen, manifesting primarily as symptoms of lower urinary tract obstruction and recurrent urinary tract infections that can significantly impact patient quality of life.1 Endoscopic treatment is commonly used as a first-line treatment option for USD; however, these techniques have been shown to be associated with high rates of recurrence ranging from 23–92%.2 Additionally, repeated endoscopic treatments can predispose patients to longer and more complex strictures that can complicate future urethral reconstructions.3 Urethroplasty is considered the gold-standard treatment for USD due to lower rates of disease recurrence compared to endoscopic treatments and improved patient outcomes.4
Progress in pre- and postoperative management of urethroplasty cases has allowed for the implementation of same-day or outpatient surgery. This approach is commonly defined as discharge within 24 hours of surgery and has previously demonstrated comparable safety and success outcomes to traditional inpatient procedures, primarily within privately funded healthcare models.5,6 Despite the demonstrated benefits, there are few centers offering same-day urethroplasty surgery within Canada, resulting in a significant lack of data on this pathway within a universal healthcare system.
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant restrictions on the number of postoperative admissions and types of procedures that could be offered at most centers. In response to this, extended day surgery (XDS ) urethroplasty was implemented at our tertiary care center to address the surgical backlog that had developed as a result of these restrictions.
The aim of our study was to evaluate the overall safety of this approach in comparison to our current standard of care. We sought to analyze patient outcomes following XDS urethroplasty by assessing 90-day postoperative complications and healthcare utilization. We hypothesized that the outcomes of XDS and inpatient surgery would not differ.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of all patients undergoing urethroplasty surgery from November 2020 to November 2021. All adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing urethroplasty at the University of Alberta Hospital and who were discharged within a <24-hour timeframe were included in the study. Electronic medical charts were reviewed to extract data. The University of Alberta Research Ethics Board granted ethics approval (Pro00107205).
Patient age, comorbidities (as per Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]), stricture characteristics (etiology, location, length), previous intervention history (endoscopic and surgical interventions), postoperative healthcare encounters, and complications were collected. Patients were then individually case control-matched based on age, stricture length, and stricture etiology to patients who previously underwent urethroplasty requiring inpatient admission postoperatively. Controls were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database of all urethral reconstructions performed at the University of Alberta Hospital between 2003 and 2019.
Comparative analysis between study cohorts was conducted using Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Univariate logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with 90-day postoperative complications, and predictors with a p-value <0.3 were included in the multivariate regression analysis. Multivariate analysis was conducted by Cox proportional hazard regression with time-to-event defined within 90 days following discharge. Categorical variables included age ≥50, stricture length ≥4 cm, CCI score >1, body mass index (BMI) ≥35, history of genitourinary surgery, comorbidity burden, stricture location, and stricture etiology; and were selected based on previously identified clinically significant variables. All statistical tests were carried out as two-sided analyses, with a p-value <0.05 used to denote statistical significance. All analyses were completed on GraphPad Prism V9.3.
RESULTS
In total, 90 patients underwent XDS urethroplasty during the study period. Subsequent case control matching with 90 admitted patients led to the inclusion of 180 patients in total. Baseline patient characteristics of the two cohorts were similar and are outlined in Table 1. The most common stricture etiology was idiopathic (48%), followed by lichen sclerosus (18%) and iatrogenic (10%); 81% of strictures were located in the anterior urethra, with bulbar urethra being the most commonly observed location for stricture development (60%). Distribution of stricture etiology and location, and number of patients with previous endoscopic intervention and urethroplasty surgery were not significantly different between study cohorts. More patients within the XDS cohort had previously undergone other genitourinary surgery compared to admitted patients (11% vs. 3%, p=0.04).
Table 1.
Patient and stricture characteristics for XDS and admit patients
| XDS (n=90) | Admit (n=90) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Mean age, yr (SD) | 53.8 (15.6) | 53.5 (15.6) | 0.88 |
|
| |||
| Mean stricture length, cm (SD) | 4.36 (2.41) | 4.41 (2.85) | 0.50 |
|
| |||
| CCI score (SD) | 1.01 (1.47) | 0.70 (1.05) | 0.22 |
|
| |||
| Stricture etiology (%) | |||
| Idiopathic | 48 (53) | 48 (53) | 1.0 |
| Lichen sclerosis | 16 (18) | 14 (16) | 0.69 |
| Iatrogenic | 9 (10) | 13 (14) | 0.36 |
| Radiation | 7 (8) | 7 (8) | 1.0 |
| Hypospadias | 5 (6) | 4 (4) | 0.73 |
| Trauma | 5 (6) | 4 (4) | 0.73 |
|
| |||
| Stricture location (%) | |||
| Bulbar | 54 (60) | 53 (59) | 0.88 |
| Penile | 23 (26) | 20 (22) | 0.60 |
| Posterior | 9 (10) | 12 (13) | 0.48 |
| Panurethral | 4 (4) | 5 (6) | 0.73 |
|
| |||
| Previous interventions (%) | |||
| Endoscopic procedures | |||
| 0 | 11(12) | 15 (17) | 0.40 |
| 1–2 | 48 (53) | 45 (50) | 0.45 |
| >2 | 31 (34) | 30 (33) | 0.87 |
|
| |||
| Surgical procedures | |||
| Urethroplasty | 10 (11) | 8 (9) | 0.62 |
| Other GU surgery | 10 (11) | 3 (3) | 0.04 |
CCI: Charleson Comorbidity Index; GU: genitourinary; SD: standard deviation; XDS: extended day surgery.
Rates of postoperative complications were similar between XDS and admitted patients (17% vs. 21%, p=0.35) (Table 2). Fifty-three percent (n=8) of complications in the XDS group were classified as clinically significant (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II), compared to 65% (n=13) in the admitted group. Postoperative infections requiring antibiotic therapy were the most commonly reported clinically significant complication. When compared to admitted patients, XDS urethroplasty was not associated with increased risk of 90-day postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR ]0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31–1.3, p=0.26) (Table 3). Strictures within the penile urethra (OR 4.21, 95% CI 1.3–13.8, p=0.02) and lichen sclerosus etiology (OR 2.91, 95% CI 0.79–9.9, p=0.08) were associated with development of complications within 90 days on regression analysis. Stricture length, age, comorbidities, previous interventions, and BMI were not associated with postoperative complications. On multivariate analysis, only penile stricture location was identified as a significant predictor of 90-day complication.
Table 2.
Classification of postoperative complications using Clavien-Dindo grading system
| CD classification | Number (%) | Complication | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| XDS (17% complication rate) | Grade I | 7 (8) | Catheter related (3) |
| Wound dehiscence (2) | |||
| Hematuria (2) | |||
| Grade II | 7 (8) | Surgical site infection (3) | |
| UTI (3) | |||
| Epididymitis (1) | |||
| Grade III | 1 (1) | Abscess requiring debridement (1) | |
|
| |||
| Admit (21% complication rate) | Grade I | 6 (7) | Wound dehiscence (4) |
| Catheter related (1) | |||
| Hematuria (1) | |||
| Grade II | 9 (10) | UTI (5) | |
| Wound related (2) | |||
| Epididymitis (1) | |||
| Surgical site infection (1) | |||
| Grade III | 4 (4) | Fistula requiring closure (3) | |
| Cystoscopic catheter reinsertion (1) | |||
CCI: Charleson Comorbidity Index; GU: genitourinary; SD: standard deviation; XDS: extended day surgery.
Table 3.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with 90-day postoperative complications Univariate analysis
| Univariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Variable | OR | 95% CI | p |
|
| |||
| Age ≥50 yrs | 0.58 | 0.19–1.8 | 0.34 |
|
| |||
| Stricture length ≥4 cm | 0.61 | 0.46–2.0 | 0.24 |
|
| |||
| CCI >1 | 0.85 | 0.26–2.6 | 0.78 |
|
| |||
| Previous surgery | 0.45 | 0.38–1.9 | 0.23 |
|
| |||
| Previous endoscopy (>2) | 0.63 | 0.16–2.1 | 0.47 |
|
| |||
| BMI ≥35 | 1.46 | 0.37–4.9 | 0.29 |
|
| |||
| Stricture location | |||
| Bulbar | 0.52 | 0.17–1.6 | 0.35 |
| Penile | 4.21 | 1.3–13.8 | 0.02 |
| Panurethral | 1.71 | 0.48–14.5 | 0.27 |
|
| |||
| Stricture etiology | |||
| Idiopathic | 1.38 | 0.45–4.5 | 0.57 |
| Lichen sclerosus | 2.91 | 0.79–9.9 | 0.08 |
| Radiation | 0.82 | 0.04–5.4 | 0.86 |
|
| |||
| XDS surgical pathway | 0.65 | 0.31–1.3 | 0.36 |
|
| |||
| Multivariate analysis | |||
|
| |||
| Variable | HR | 95% CI | p |
|
| |||
| Penile stricture | 4.78 | 1.2–19.4 | 0.03 |
|
| |||
| Panurethral stricture | 7.79 | 0.32–89.9 | 0.12 |
|
| |||
| Lichen sclerosus | 0.75 | 0.16–3.2 | 0.70 |
|
| |||
| Stricture length >4 cm | 0.60 | 0.14–1.9 | 0.44 |
|
| |||
| Previous surgery | 0.34 | 0.04–1.7 | 0.22 |
|
| |||
| BMI ≥35 | 0.90 | 0.21–3.1 | 0.87 |
BMI: body mass index; CCI: Charleson Comorbidity Index; CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; OR: odds ratio; XDS: extended day surgery.
Overall, 47% of patients (n=43) had documented unplanned healthcare interactions within 90 days of discharge, resulting in 75 unplanned encounters (Table 4). Of these patients, 37% (n=16) had ≥2 interactions within 90 days, and 19% (n=8) presented with multiple types of healthcare interactions. More patients contacted the clinic by phone (n=26) than presented to the emergency department (ED ) (n=22); however, the total number of events were similar between the two groups (n=37 vs. n=36). Wound care questions were the most common reason for clinic phone calls (43%, n=16), whereas Foley catheter issues were the most common reason for ED presentation (42%, n=15). Of patients who presented by phone, 8% (n=3) experienced a postoperative complication, while the rest were managed with reassurance. Twenty-eight percent (n=8) of patients presenting to the ED experienced a postoperative complication. Only two patients had unplanned clinic visits, both of which had a postoperative complication (catheter blockage and infection). Time to presentation was similar for all interaction types, with an average of 13.9 days for phone calls, 13.1 days for ED visits, and 14 days for clinic visits.
Table 4.
Healthcare encounters and complication rate in 90-day postoperative period
| Type | Patients (n=43) | Events (n=75) | Mean days to contact (SD) | Reason for interaction | Complication rate (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Phone call | 26 | 37 | 13.9 (10.4) | Wound care (16) | 8% (3) |
| Foley care (8) | |||||
| Pain (8) | |||||
| Other (5) | |||||
|
| |||||
| Emergency department | 22 | 36 | 13.1 (6.22) | Foley dysfunction (15) | 28% (10) |
| UTI (3) | |||||
| Surgical site infection (2) | |||||
| Epididymitis (1) | |||||
| Bleeding (6) | |||||
| Pain (5) | |||||
| Other (4) | |||||
|
| |||||
| Unplanned clinic | 2 | 2 | 14.0 (2.82) | Catheter blockage (1) | 100% (2) |
| Penoscrotal abscess (1) | |||||
Complication rate: total number of reported complications per encounter type divided by total number of encounter type events; SD: standard deviation; UTI: urinary tract infection.
DISCUSSION
This is the first study to evaluate XDS urethroplasty at a Canadian cener. Our data shows that XDS is a safe and effective option for the management of urethral strictures. There were comparable rates of 90-day complications between XDS and admitted patients when controlling for key patient factors, corroborating previous studies from other centers.6,7 Of these patients, presence of a penile stricture and underlying inflammatory etiology were associated with increased odds of developing a postoperative complication. Furthermore, during the 90-day postoperative period 48% of patients undergoing XDS had unplanned healthcare interactions, with a similar number of phone calls and ED visits.
Previous studies have identified inflammatory strictures as a risk factors for urethroplasty failure; specifically, the presence of lichen sclerosus portends a poorer prognosis overall, and has been clearly identified as an independent predictor of stricture recurrence.8,9
While the exact mechanism remains unclear, it is thought that chronic localized inflammation leads to alterations in cellular differentiation and proliferation, resulting in a pro-fibrotic environment that favors stricture recurrence.10 Furthermore, variations in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEG F) expression have also been reported in lichen sclerosus patients, impairing wound healing through decreased oxygen and nutrient delivery to the urethral plate following surgical repair.11
Additionally, penile strictures have been associated with increased risk of stricture recurrence, as well as complications in patients awaiting urethroplasty.12 This is thought to be due to the high correlation of penile strictures with lichen sclerosus, which results in longer, more complicated strictures, as well as poorer vascularization in comparison to other urethral segments.13
While the majority of studies have focused on long-term outcomes, a more recent report has demonstrated that rates of 90-day complications following urethroplasty were increased in patients with strictures caused by lichen sclerosus, but not in those with penile strictures.14 We found that strictures within the penile urethra and those caused by lichen sclerosus were associated with developing a postoperative complication on univariate analysis; however, only penile location was shown to be significant on multivariate analysis.
Our results suggest that disease mechanisms predisposing patients to stricture recurrence following urethroplasty may be occurring early in the postoperative course, leading to shorter-term complications. Further studies evaluating the association between short-term complications and stricture recurrence may be useful in stratifying risk of future complications and identifying patients in need of increased monitoring.
When controlling for key patient characteristics between cohorts, XDS was shown to reduce hospital length of stay, with no significant impact on short-term postoperative outcomes. A median wait time of 151 days for definitive urethroplasty was previously reported for our center, which is much longer than comparable American centers.12 The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally altered the delivery of health services in Canada, further exacerbating this pre-existing problem. Reductions in surgical volume have been reported by centers across the country as a result of pandemic restrictions, resulting in significant increases in wait times for elective and non-emergent procedures.15 Average wait times for definitive urethroplasty in Quebec have increased 68% to a median of 557 days.16 These effects are not specific to Canada, with centers across the world experiencing similar delays for urological procedures.17,18
Despite widespread implementation of vaccines and easing of restrictions, there has been a slow transition back to baseline volumes. A retrospective time-series analysis of all surgical procedures conducted at a similarly sized tertiary care center in America found that urological surgeries have only returned to 85% of prepandemic levels.19 Deferral of surgical treatment is associated with significant risks, ranging from deterioration in mental health and quality of life, to disease progression and increased rates of mortality.20 Addressing backlogs is therefore crucial for minimizing patient morbidity and improving health outcomes.
Modelling studies have been used to better quantify these delays and estimate time and resources required to clear surgical backlogs. A study conducted in late 2020 estimated it would take 84 weeks to address surgical backlogs in Canada with ideal allocation of resources, such as increased OR time, and ward/ICU beds;21 however, this model did not account for recurrent waves and reimplementation of restrictions, ultimately resulting in continued delays in accessing timely public surgical care.
Although more stringent policies and restrictions to reduce the spread of COVID-19 and streamline access to emergent surgeries, they significantly delay access to elective procedures.22 Novel approaches to clearing these backlogs have emerged as a result, specifically shifting to outpatient procedures where possible to maintain surgical volume while decreasing healthcare utilization. Transition to ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotripsy was previously reported to significantly decrease length of hospitalization with no impact on short-term outcomes, while additionally saving approximately $5327 per case.23 Similar findings have been reported for robotic pelvic floor reconstruction, where transition to outpatient procedures has decreased length of stay and associated healthcare costs.24 Canadian centers that have implemented outpatient surgeries in lieu of inpatient surgeries have demonstrated comparable outcomes while increasing volume and patient satisfaction.25
An essential aspect of implementing XDS at our center involved creating a clearly defined pathway that focused on staff and patient education, maintenance of analgesia, and definitive followup plan. Postoperative healthcare encounters are an important metric to analyze in this setting, as frequent presentations lead to increased healthcare utilization. Inappropriate analgesia and hemorrhage are the most common reasons for ED presentations following outpatient surgery, and urological surgery has been identified with increased rates of postoperative presentations.26
When specifically looking at reasons for representation to healthcare in urological patients, hematuria, urinary retention, and urinary tract infections are the most common presenting complaints.27 We found an overall healthcare encounter rate of 48% in our study, similar to what has been previously reported for ambulatory urethroplasty;6 however, when looking at true rate of complications, only 28% of patients presenting to ED experienced complications requiring intervention, meaning that the majority of these visits were avoidable. Interestingly, time to ED presentation and phone call to clinic were similar, which could indicate a window of time in which pre-emptive intervention could be implemented to reduce unnecessary ED presentations.
One reason for the high rate of unnecessary visits may be due to patient anxiety about inadequate healing, and interpretation of normal postoperative course as more serious signs of underlying complications.28 Preemptive interventions, such as multimedia communication and contact by specialized clinical nurse educators, have been shown to be effective in reducing the rates of unnecessary ED presentations.29,30 Further implementation of these strategies in the context of expedited patient discharge may be additive in reducing overall healthcare utilization and expenditures and have the additional benefit of increasing patient satisfaction and perceived quality of life in the postoperative period.
Limitations
There are several limitations to our current study. First, this is a single-center, retrospective review, which limits wider extrapolation of our findings. Second, we evaluated a surgical pathway that had been recently implemented at our center. This ultimately resulted in a relatively small sample size with limited time to follow up. We tried to address this through comparative case control matching to maximize the internal validity of the study using a larger patient pool over an extended period of time.
CONCLUSIONS
XDS urethroplasty is a highly effective treatment option for USD and is not associated with increased rates of 90-day postoperative complications compared to inpatient urethroplasties. Presence of a penile stricture increased risk of developing a 90-day postoperative complication on multivariate analysis. Overall, our findings demonstrate that <24-hour discharge following urethroplasty is both feasible and safe within the Canadian context. Future studies evaluating long-term outcomes of XDS urethroplasty patients will provide further insight into the comparative efficacy of this protocol relative to the current standards of care.
KEY MESSAGES
■ Rates of 90-day postoperative complications for patients undergoing extended day surgery (XDS ) urethroplasty are similar to patients admitted to hospital postoperatively.
■ Patients with penile urethral strictures were shown to have an increased risk of developing a postoperative complication on multivariate analysis.
■ Frequency of clinic phone calls and ED visits are similar within the postoperative period; however, patients presenting to the ED are more likely to have a true complication.
■ XDS urethroplasty is a safe and effective treatment option for urethral strictures within a publicly funded healthcare model.
■ Implementation of pre-emptive patient outreach and education within two weeks of surgery may decrease numbers of unplanned and avoidable healthcare interactions.
Footnotes
See related commentary on page 183
This paper has been peer-reviewed.
REFERENCES
- 1.Lazzeri M, Sansalone S, Guazzoni G, et al. Incidence, causes, and complications of urethral stricture disease. Eur Urol Suppl. 2016;15:2–6. doi: 10.1016/j.eursup.2015.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Moynihan MJ, Voelzke B, Myers J, et al. Endoscopic treatments prior to urethroplasty: Trends in management of urethral stricture disease. BMC Urol. 2020;20:68. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00638-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hudak SJ, Atkinson TH, et al. Repeat transurethral manipulation of bulbar urethral strictures is associated with increased stricture complexity and prolonged disease duration. J Urol. 2012;187:1691–5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bertrand LA, Voelzke BB, Elliott SP, et al. Measuring and predicting patient dissatisfaction after anterior urethroplasty using patient reported outcomes measures. J Urol. 2016;196:453–61. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kinnaird AS, Levine MA, Ambati D, et al. Stricture length and etiology as preoperative independent predictors of recurrence after urethroplasty: A multivariate analysis of 604 urethroplasties. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8:E296–300. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Theisen K, Fuller TW, Bansal U, et al. Safety and surgical outcomes of same-day anterior urethroplasty. Urology. 2017;102:229–33. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McKibben MJ, Davenport MT, Mukherjee P, et al. Outpatient buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty outcomes are comparable to inpatient procedures. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9:16–22. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Spilotros M, Sihra N, Malde S, et al. Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in men-risk factors for recurrence and complications: a third referral centre experience in anterior urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:510–6. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.03.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shalkamy O, Abdelazim H, Elshazly A, et al. Factors predicting urethral stricture recurrence after dorsal onlay augmented, buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty. Urol Int. 2021;105:269–77. doi: 10.1159/000512065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fergus KB, Lee AW, Baradaran N, et al. Pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment of lichen sclerosus: A systematic review. Urology. 2020;135:11–9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Levy AC, Moynihan M, Bennett JA, et al. Protein expression profiles among lichen sclerosus urethral strictures-can urethroplasty success be predicted? J Urol. 2020;203:773–8. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hoy NY, Chapman DW, Dean N, et al. Incidence and predictors of complications due to urethral stricture in patients awaiting urethroplasty. J Urol. 2018;199:754–9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hampson LA, McAninch JW, Breyer BN. Male urethral strictures and their management. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:43–50. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kay HE, Srikanth P, Srivastava AV, et al. Preoperative and intraoperative factors predictive of complications and stricture recurrence after multiple urethroplasty techniques. J Am Coll Surg. 2021;233:S309–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.07.641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Saggaf MM, Anastakis DJ. The impact of COVID-19 on the surgical wait times for plastic and reconstructive surgery in Ontario. Plast Surg. 2021:22925503211064380. doi: 10.1177/22925503211064381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Garabed LR, Nguyen DD, Liberman D. The impact of COVID-19 on urethroplasty surgical wait-times in a Canadian referral center. Eur Urol. 2022;81:S1263. doi: 10.1016/S0302-2838(22)00930-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Juul N, Cazals A, Hofmann A, et al. How the first year of COVID-19 affected elective pediatric urology patients: A longitudinal study based on waiting lists and surveys from 10 European centers. Front Public Health. 2022;10:874758. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.874758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Collins PM, Madden A, O’Connell C, et al. Urological service provision during the COVID-19 period: The experience from an Irish tertiary centre. Ir J Med Sci. 2021;190:455–60. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02352-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ghoshal S, Rigney G, Cheng D, et al. Institutional surgical response and associated volume trends throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and postvaccination recovery period. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2227443. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gagliardi AR, Yip CYY, Irish J, et al. The psychological burden of waiting for procedures and patient-centred strategies that could support the mental health of wait-listed patients and caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Health Expect. 2021;24:978–90. doi: 10.1111/hex.13241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang J, Vahid S, Eberg M, et al. Clearing the surgical backlog caused by COVID-19 in Ontario: A time series modelling study. CMAJ. 2020;192:E1347–56. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Truche P, Campos LN, Marrazzo EB, et al. Association between government policy and delays in emergent and elective surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: A modeling study. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021;3:100056. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee MS, Assmus MA, Agarwal DK, et al. Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy may be cost-effective compared to standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 26:176–82. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Berger AA, Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA. Utilizing outpatient pelvic reconstructive surgery in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Urogynecology. 2021;27:735–9. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Peacock S, Wolfstadt J, Peer M, et al. Rapid implementation of an outpatient arthroplasty care pathway: a COVID-19-driven quality improvement initiative. BMJ Open Qual. 2022;11:e001698. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sawhney M, Goldstein DH, Wei X, et al. Pain and haemorrhage are the most common reasons for emergency department use and hospital admission in adults following ambulatory surgery: Results of a population-based cohort study. Perioper Med. 2020;9:25. doi: 10.1186/s13741-020-00155-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Witherspoon L, Breau RH, Langley C, et al. Returning to the emergency room: An analysis of emergency encounters following urological outpatient surgery. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021;15:333–8. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tham E, Nandra K, Whang SE, et al. Postoperative telehealth visits reduce emergency department visits and 30-day readmissions in elective thoracic surgery patients. J Healthc Qual JHQ. 2021;43:204–13. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tackitt HM, Eaton SH, Lentz AC. Nurse-initiated telephone follow up after ureteroscopic stone surgery. Urol Nurs. 2016;36:283–9. doi: 10.7257/1053-816X.2016.36.6.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chua ME, Saunders MA, Bowlin PR, et al. Impact of smartphone digital photography, email, and media communication on emergency room visits post-hypospadias repair. Can Urol Assoc. 2017;11:E134–7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
