Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2023 Mar 14;176(4):472–479. doi: 10.7326/M22-2750

Cardiac Arrest During Delivery Hospitalization: A Cohort Study

Nicole D Ford 1, Carla L DeSisto 2, Romeo R Galang 3, Elena V Kuklina 4, Laurence S Sperling 5, Jean Y Ko 6
PMCID: PMC10264156  NIHMSID: NIHMS1898954  PMID: 36913690

Abstract

Background:

Estimates of cardiac arrest occurring during delivery guide evidence-based strategies to reduce pregnancy-related death.

Objective:

To investigate rate of, maternal characteristics associated with, and survival after cardiac arrest during delivery hospitalization.

Design:

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting:

U.S. acute care hospitals, 2017 to 2019.

Participants:

Delivery hospitalizations among women aged 12 to 55 years included in the National Inpatient Sample database.

Measurements:

Delivery hospitalizations, cardiac arrest, underlying medical conditions, obstetric outcomes, and severe maternal complications were identified using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification. Survival to hospital discharge was based on discharge disposition.

Results:

Among 10 921 784 U.S. delivery hospitalizations, the cardiac arrest rate was 13.4 per 100 000. Of the 1465 patients who had cardiac arrest, 68.6% (95% CI, 63.2% to 74.0%) survived to hospital discharge. Cardiac arrest was more common among patients who were older, were non-Hispanic Black, had Medicare or Medicaid, or had underlying medical conditions. Acute respiratory distress syndrome was the most common co-occurring diagnosis (56.0% [CI, 50.2% to 61.7%]). Among co-occurring procedures or interventions examined, mechanical ventilation was the most common (53.2% [CI, 47.5% to 59.0%]). The rate of survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest was lower with co-occurring disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) without or with transfusion (50.0% [CI, 35.8% to 64.2%] or 54.3% [CI, 39.2% to 69.5%], respectively).

Limitations:

Cardiac arrests occurring outside delivery hospitalizations were not included. The temporality of arrest relative to the delivery or other maternal complications is unknown. Data do not distinguish cause of cardiac arrest, such as pregnancy-related complications or other underlying causes among pregnant women.

Conclusion:

Cardiac arrest was observed in approximately 1 in 9000 delivery hospitalizations, among which nearly 7 in 10 women survived to hospital discharge. Survival was lowest during hospitalizations with co-occurring DIC.

Primary Funding Source:

None.


Cardiac arrest is an uncommon but serious maternal complication. During 1998 to 2011, it occurred in 1 in 12 000 delivery hospitalizations in the United States (1). Among these, 58.9% of patients survived to hospital discharge, with survival varying by underlying cause of arrest (1).

Maternal cardiac arrest is an indicator of severe maternal morbidity—that is, unexpected outcomes of labor and delivery that result in significant short- or long-term health consequences (2). If not identified and treated promptly, these conditions can lead to pregnancy-related death (3). An analysis of Canadian delivery hospitalizations during 2012 to 2016 found that case fatality rates among severe maternal morbidity subtypes were highest among women who had cardiac arrest and resuscitation (241.1 deaths per 1000 deliveries) (4).

Estimates of severe maternal complications occurring during delivery hospitalization provide information for evidence-based strategies to reduce pregnancy-related death. The objectives of these analyses were to calculate weighted annual estimates of and assess trends in cardiac arrest and survival during delivery hospitalization in the United States in 2017 to 2019; to examine cardiac arrest by patient-, hospital-, and community-level characteristics; and to estimate the prevalence of co-occurring severe maternal complications, the rate of cardiac arrest among deliveries with each complication, and the percentage of survival to hospital discharge by each complication.

METHODS

Study Population

This retrospective cohort study used data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS). The NIS is an all-payer inpatient health care database that is publicly available; approximates a 20% stratified sample of discharges from U.S. community hospitals, excluding rehabilitation and long-term acute care hospitals; and is weighted to be nationally representative (5). The NIS data are collected cross-sectionally and include diagnostic and procedure codes occurring during hospitalization from the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), but the data do not provide information about the timing of events within the hospitalization. We first identified hospitalizations of women aged 12 to 55 years during 2017 to 2019. Using a standard algorithm, we then identified those during which a stillbirth or live birth occurred (6). The algorithm uses ICD-10-CM diagnostic and procedure codes pertaining to delivery and diagnosis-related group delivery codes to identify deliveries (Supplement Table 1, available at Annals.org), excluding pregnancies with abortive outcomes and molar and ectopic pregnancies.

Outcomes

We identified in-hospital cardiac arrest using ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for cardiac arrest (I46.2, I46.8, and I46.9), postprocedural cardiac arrest after cardiac or other surgery (I97.120 and I9.121), intraoperative cardiac arrest during cardiac or other surgery (I97.710 and I97.711), cardiac arrest due to anesthesia during pregnancy (O29.112, O29.113, and O29.119), or ventricular fibrillation (I49.01), or the procedure code for performance of cardiac output (single, manual; 5A12012). We determined survival to hospital discharge using discharge disposition.

Patient-, Hospital-, and Community-Level Characteristics

Patient-, hospital-, and community-level characteristics are included in the NIS database as recorded during the hospitalization. Patient age in years at hospital admission is based on maternal birth and admission dates. The HCUP classified patients of Hispanic origin as Hispanic and classified non-Hispanic patients by their reported race (7). It categorized race and ethnicity as Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, Black, Native American, White, or other. Because of small sample sizes, we created the group “another non-Hispanic race,” combining HCUP’s race categories for Native American and other. Payer indicates the expected primary payer for the hospitalization and was categorized as private, Medicare or Medicaid, or other (self-pay, no charge, or other). The HCUP categorized median household income for the patient’s ZIP code into quartiles. Rurality was derived from the National Center for Health Statistics urban–rural classification for the patient’s county of residence and was classified as metropolitan, micropolitan, or rural (nonmetropolitan and nonmicropolitan) (8). The HCUP obtained teaching hospital status and census region from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Because the HCUP does not classify rural hospitals according to teaching status, nonteaching hospitals include all rural hospitals and nonteaching urban hospitals. We calculated annual delivery volume for each hospital and divided hospitals into low (<1000), medium (1000 to 2000), and high (>2000) annual delivery volumes (9). The HCUP calculates length of stay by subtracting the admission date from the discharge date. Disposition of the patient at discharge was classified as routine, transfer to short-term hospital, other transfer (such as skilled-nursing or immediate care facility), home health care, against medical advice, or died.

We identified underlying medical conditions, obstetric outcomes, and severe maternal complications using ICD-10-CM diagnosis and procedure codes (Supplement Table 1). Underlying medical conditions included asthma, acquired heart disease, congenital heart disease, chronic hypertension, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary hypertension, mental health disorders, systemic lupus erythematosus, substance use disorder, and tobacco use disorder. Obstetric outcomes included multiple gestation, stillbirth, and cesarean delivery. Severe maternal complications were based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 21 indicators of severe maternal morbidity grouped into diagnoses (air or thrombotic embolism, acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure or pulmonary edema, acute renal failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, amniotic fluid embolism, aortic aneurysm or dissection, disseminated intravascular coagulation [DIC], puerperal cerebrovascular disorders, severe anesthesia complications, sepsis, shock, and sickle cell disease with crisis) and procedures or interventions (blood product transfusion, hysterectomy, temporary tracheostomy, conversion of cardiac rhythm, and mechanical ventilation) (6). Other severe maternal complications included arrhythmia, severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (severe preeclampsia; eclampsia; and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count [HELLP] syndrome), status asthmaticus, and peripartum cardiomyopathy (4, 10).

Statistical Analysis

We calculated the weighted annual rate of cardiac arrest per 100 000 delivery hospitalizations and associated 95% CI. Pooling data from 2017 to 2019, we examined patient-, hospital-, and community-level characteristics; obstetric outcomes; length of stay; and discharge disposition by cardiac arrest status. We assessed differences by examining 95% CIs. Among delivery hospitalizations with cardiac arrest, we calculated the annual weighted percentage of survival to hospital discharge, the weighted prevalence of co-occurring severe maternal complications (described above) by complication, and survival to hospital discharge by complication. To evaluate survival by hospital-level characteristics, we calculated the weighted percentage of survival to hospital discharge by annual hospital delivery volume and teaching hospital status. We also calculated the cardiac arrest rate per 1000 deliveries with amniotic fluid embolism, a known cause of maternal cardiac arrest (11).

All analyses were done using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute). We used SAS survey procedures and weighting to account for complex sampling in the NIS, including hospital-level clustering (Supplement Methods, available at Annals.org). This activity was consistent with applicable federal law and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention policy (see, for example, 45 C.F.R. §46, 21 C.F.R. §56, 42 U.S.C. §241[d], 5 U.S.C. §552[a], and 44 U.S.C. §3501 et seq.).

Role of the Funding Source

No funding was received for this work.

RESULTS

Among 10 921 784 delivery hospitalizations, we identified 1465 cardiac arrests. All delivery hospitalizations with cardiac arrest had complete information on survival. Supplement Table 2 (available at Annals.org) outlines missingness of patient-, hospital-, and community-level characteristics; length of stay; and discharge disposition.

The overall rate of cardiac arrest during 2017 to 2019 was 13.4 events (95% CI, 11.9 to 14.9 events) per 100 000 delivery hospitalizations and did not change during the study period (Figure 1). In total, 1005 (68.6% [CI, 63.2% to 74.0%]) of the 1435 women with cardiac arrest during delivery hospitalization survived to hospital discharge. Survival remained stable during the study period (Figure 2) and did not vary by annual hospital delivery volume or teaching hospital status (Supplement Figure, available at Annals.org).

Figure 1. Rate of documented cardiac arrest during delivery hospitalization (per 100 000 delivery hospitalizations), by year.

Figure 1.

Data are from the National Inpatient Sample (weighted n = 10 921 784). Overall rate during 2017–2019 was 13.4 events (95% CI, 11.9–14.9 events) per 100 000 delivery hospitalizations.

Figure 2. Proportion of survival to hospital discharge after documented cardiac arrest during delivery hospitalization, by year.

Figure 2.

Data are from the National Inpatient Sample (weighted n = 1465). Overall survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest during 2017–2019 was 68.6% (95% CI, 63.2% to 74.0%).

Table 1 presents the patient-, hospital-, and community-level characteristics at baseline, both overall and stratified by the presence of a cardiac arrest code. Compared with patients hospitalized without cardiac arrest, those hospitalized with a cardiac arrest code were older; more likely to be Black; and more likely to have Medicare or Medicaid and underlying medical conditions, including chronic hypertension, mental health disorders, substance use disorder, and acquired heart disease.

Table 1.

Patient-, Hospital-, and Community-Level Characteristics, by Documented Cardiac Arrest During Delivery Hospitalization*

Characteristic Total (n = 10 921 784) Cardiac Arrest (n = 1465) No Documented Cardiac Arrest (n = 10 920 319)



Patients, n Percentage (95% CI) Patients, n Percentage (95% CI) Patients, n Percentage (95% CI)
Patient characteristics
 Median maternal age (Q1, Q3), y 10 921 784 28.4 (24.2, 32.5) 1465 31.1 (26.5, 35.8) 10 920 319 28.4 (24.2, 32.5)
 Race/ethnicity
  Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander 657 529 6.3 (5.9–6.6) 115 8.1 (5.0–11.3) 657 414 6.3 (5.9–6.6)
  Non-Hispanic Black 1 588 355 15.1 (14.7–15.5) 405 28.6 (23.4–33.9) 1 587 950 15.1 (14.7–15.5)
  Hispanic 2 186 989 20.8 (20.2–21.4) 280 19.8 (15.0–24.6) 2 186 709 20.8 (20.2–21.4)
  Another Non-Hispanic race 563 430 5.4 (5.1–5.6) 80 5.7 (3.0–8.4) 563 350 5.4 (5.1–5.6)
  Non-Hispanic White 5 514 981 52.5 (51.8–53.2) 535 37.8 (32.1–43.5) 5 514 446 52.5 (51.8–53.2)
 Payer
  Medicare/Medicaid 4 709 708 43.2 (42.5–43.8) 775 53.1 (47.3–58.8) 4 708 933 43.2 (42.5–43.8)
  Private insurance 5 615 161 51.5 (50.8–52.1) 610 41.8 (36.0–47.5) 5 614 551 51.5 (50.8–52.1)
  Self-pay/other 583 095 5.3 (5.2–5.5) 75 5.1 (2.6–7.7) 583 020 5.3 (5.2–5.5)
 Rurality (county-level)§
  Metropolitan 9 430 042 86.6 (86.2–87.0) 1255 85.7 (81.7–89.7) 9 428 787 86.6 (86.2–87.0)
  Micropolitan 875 499 8.0 (7.8–8.3) 105 7.2 (4.2–10.1) 875 394 8.0 (7.8–8.3)
  Rural 587 133 5.4 (5.2–5.6) 105 7.2 (4.2–10.1) 587 028 5.4 (5.2–5.6)
  National quartile of median household-level income for patient ZIP code||
  Q1 3 016 334 27.9 (27.2–28.5) 480 33.1 (27.7–38.5) 3 015 854 27.9 (27.2–28.5)
  Q2 2 754 128 25.4 (25.0–25.9) 410 28.3 (23.2–33.4) 2 753 718 25.4 (25.0–25.9)
  Q3 2 681 533 24.8 (24.4–25.2) 350 24.1 (19.1–29.1) 2 681 183 24.8 (24.4–25.2)
  Q4 2 369 949 21.9 (21.2–22.6) 210 14.5 (10.4–18.6) 2 369 739 21.9 (21.2–22.6)
 Underlying medical conditions
  Asthma 570 790 5.2 (5.1–5.3) 145 9.9 (6.5–13.3) 570 645 5.2 (5.1–5.3)
  Diabetes mellitus 138 845 1.3 (1.2–1.3) 50 3.4 (1.3–5.5) 138 795 1.3 (1.2–1.3)
  Chronic hypertension 307 815 2.8 (2.8–2.9) 200 13.7 (9.8–17.5) 307 615 2.8 (2.8–2.9)
  Chronic kidney disease 29 180 0.3 (0.3–0.3) 115 7.8 (4.8–10.9) 29 065 0.3 (0.3–0.3)
  Acquired heart disease** 21 095 0.2 (0.2–0.2) 90 6.1 (3.4–8.9) 21 005 0.2 (0.2–0.2)
  Congenital heart disease 11 795 0.1 (0.1–0.1) 15 1.0 (0.0–2.2) 11 780 0.1 (0.1–0.1)
  Pulmonary hypertension 2680 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 40 2.7 (0.9–4.6) 2640 0.0 (0.0–0.0)
  Systemic lupus erythematosus 15 540 0.1 (0.1–0.1) †† 15 535 0.1 (0.1–0.1)
  Mental health disorder 848 555 7.8 (7.6–7.9) 265 18.1 (13.6–22.6) 848 290 7.8 (7.6–7.9)
  Substance use disorder 291 690 2.7 (2.6–2.7) 135 9.2 (5.9–12.5) 291 555 2.7 (2.6–2.7)
  Tobacco use disorder 1 207 744 11.1 (10.8–11.3) 245 16.7 (12.5–20.9) 1 207 499 11.1 (10.8–11.3)
Hospital characteristics
Region
  Northeast 1 740 900 15.9 (15.2–16.7) 195 13.3 (9.4–17.2) 1 740 705 15.9 (15.2–16.7)
  Midwest 2 309 002 21.1 (20.4–21.9) 280 19.1 (14.7–23.5) 2 308 722 21.1 (20.4–21.9)
  South 4 288 031 39.3 (38.2–40.3) 570 38.9 (33.3–44.5) 4 287 461 39.3 (38.2–40.3)
  West 2 583 851 23.7 (22.8–24.5) 420 28.7 (23.4–34.0) 2 583 431 23.7 (22.8–24.5)
 Teaching hospital‡‡
  Yes 7 803 252 71.4 (70.7–72.2) 1140 77.8 (73.0–82.6) 7 802 112 71.4 (70.7–72.2)
  No 3 118 532 28.6 (27.8–29.3) 325 22.2 (17.4–27.0) 3 118 207 28.6 (27.8–29.3)
 Annual delivery volume
  Low (<1000 deliveries) 1 963 580 18.0 (17.4–18.6) 200 13.7 (9.7–17.6) 1 963 380 18.0 (17.4–18.6)
  Medium (1000–2000 deliveries) 2 440 195 22.3 (21.3–23.3) 345 23.5 (18.5–28.6) 2 439 850 22.3 (21.3–23.3)
  High (>2000 deliveries) 6 518 009 59.7 (58.5–60.9) 920 62.8 (57.1–68.5) 6 517 089 59.7 (58.5–60.9)

Q = quartile.

*

Data are from the National Inpatient Sample. Numbers are weighted and may vary due to missing data.

Unless indicated in row header as median (Q1, Q3).

Includes Native American and other races not specified (7).

§

Metropolitan includes metropolitan counties with populations of ≥50 000. Rural includes all nonmetropolitan and nonmicropolitan counties (8).

||

For 2017, Q1 is $1–$43 999, Q2 is $44 000–$55 999, Q3 is $56 000–$73 999, and Q4 is ≥$74 000. For 2018, Q1 is $1–$45 999, Q2 is $46 000–$58 999, Q3 is $59 000–$78 999, and Q4 is ≥$79 000. For 2019, Q1 is $1–$47 999, Q2 is $48 000–$60 999, Q3 is $61 000–$81 999, and Q4 is ≥$82 000.

Not including gestational diabetes.

**

Includes chronic ischemic heart disease and valvular heart disease.

††

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s data use agreement prohibits reporting estimates based on <11 observations.

‡‡

Because the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project does not classify rural hospitals according to teaching status, nonteaching hospitals include all rural hospitals and those urban hospitals that are nonteaching hospitals.

Table 2 presents obstetric outcomes, length of stay, and discharge disposition, both overall and stratified by the presence of a cardiac arrest code. The median length of stay among delivery hospitalizations with a cardiac arrest code was 5.1 days (IQR, 5.0 days), versus 2.0 days (IQR, 0.1 days) for those without (Table 2). Among delivery hospitalizations with cardiac arrest, 49% ended with a routine hospital discharge disposition.

Table 2.

Obstetric Outcomes, Length of Stay, and Discharge Disposition, by Documented Cardiac Arrest During Delivery Hospitalization*

Characteristic Total (n = 10 921 784)
Cardiac Arrest (n = 1465)
No Documented Cardiac Arrest (n = 10 920 319)
Patients, n Percentage (95% CI) Patients, n Percentage (95% CI) Patients, n Percentage (95% CI)
Obstetric outcomes
 Multiple gestation 223 085 2.0 (2.0–2.1) 75 5.1 (2.6–7.6) 223 010 2.0 (2.0–2.1)
 Stillbirth 78 555 0.7 (0.7–0.7) 135 9.2 (5.9–12.5) 78 420 0.7 (0.7–0.7)
 Cesarean delivery 3 504 503 32.1 (31.9–32.2) 1230 84.0 (79.8–88.2) 3 503 273 32.1 (31.9–32.2)
Median length of stay (Q1, Q3), d
Discharge disposition 10 921 784 1.8 (1.3, 2.6) 1465 3.9 (1.2, 9.0) 10 920 319 1.8 (1.3, 2.6)
 Routine 10 760 614 98.5 (98.4–98.7) 710 48.5 (42.7–54.3) 10 759 904 98.5 (98.4–98.7)
 Transfer to short-term hospital 13 990 0.1 (0.1–0.1) 120 8.2 (5.0–11.3) 13 870 0.1 (0.1–0.1)
 Other transfer 5500 0.1 (0.0–0.1) 125 8.5 (5.3–11.7) 5375 0.0 (0.0–0.1)
 Home health care 126 235 1.2 (1.0–1.3) 50 3.4 (1.3–5.5) 126 185 1.2 (1.0–1.3)
 Against medical advice 12 855 0.1 (0.1–0.1) 0 12 855 0.1 (0.1–0.1)
 Died 680 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 460 31.4 (26.0–36.8) 220 0.0 (0.0–0.0)

Q = quartile.

*

Data are from the National Inpatient Sample. Numbers are weighted and may vary due to missing data.

Unless indicated in row header as median (Q1, Q3).

Routine includes “discharged to home or self care (routine discharge),” “court/law enforcement,” “discharged to home or self care with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission,” and “discharged/transferred to court/law enforcement with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission.” Transfer to short-term hospital includes “discharged/transferred to a short-term hospital for inpatient care,” “discharged/transferred to a designated Cancer Center or Children’s Hospital,” “discharged/transferred to a federal health care facility,” “discharged/transferred to a critical access hospital,” “discharged/transferred to a short term general hospital for inpatient care with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission,” “discharged/transferred to a designated Cancer Center or Children’s Hospital with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission,” “discharged/transferred to a federal health care facility with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission,” and “discharged/transferred to a critical access hospital with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission.” Other transfer includes “hospice-medical facility,” “discharged/transferred to a hospital-based Medicare approved swing bed,” “discharged/transferred to an inpatient rehabilitation facility including rehabilitation distinct part unit of a hospital,” “discharged/transferred to a Medicare certified long term care hospital, “discharged/transferred to a nursing facility certified by Medicaid, but not certified by Medicare,” “discharged/transferred to a psychiatric hospital or psychiatric distinct part unit of a hospital,” “discharged/transferred to a designated disaster alternative care site,” “discharged/transferred to another type of institution not defined elsewhere,” “discharged/transferred to a skilled nursing facility with Medicare certification with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission,” “discharged/transferred to a facility that provides custodial or supportive care with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission,” “discharged/transferred to a hospital-based Medicare approved swing bed with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission,” “discharged/transferred to an inpatient rehabilitation facility including rehabilitation distinct part units of a hospital with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission,” “discharged/transferred to a Medicare certified long term care hospital with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission,” “discharged/transferred to a nursing facility certified under Medicaid but not certified under Medicare with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission,” “discharged/transferred to a psychiatric hospital or psychiatric distinct part unit of a hospital with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission,” and “discharged/transferred to another type of health care institution not defined elsewhere with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission.” Home health care includes “discharged/transferred to home under care of organized home health service organization,” “home IV provider,” “hospice-home,” and “discharged/transferred to a home under care of organized home health service organization with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission.”

Table 3 presents the distribution of documented cardiac arrests during delivery hospitalization, by diagnoses and procedures or interventions. Acute respiratory distress syndrome was the most common co-occurring diagnosis (56.0% [CI, 50.2% to 61.7%]) (Table 3). Among co-occurring procedures or interventions examined, mechanical ventilation was the most common (53.2% [CI, 47.5% to 59.0%]). Survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest was lower with co-occurring DIC without or with transfusion (50.0% [CI, 35.8% to 64.2%] or 54.3% [CI, 39.2% to 69.5%], respectively). There were 357.7 cardiac arrests (CI, 277.3 to 438.0 cardiac arrests) per 1000 deliveries where amniotic fluid embolism was documented.

Table 3.

Distribution of Documented Cardiac Arrests During Delivery Hospitalization*

Severe Maternal Complication Prevalence of Co-occurring Severe Maternal Complication (n = 1465)
Survival to Hospital Discharge (n = 1005)
Patients, n Percentage (95% CI) Patients, n Percentage (95% CI)
Diagnoses
 Acute respiratory distress syndrome 820 56.0 (50.2–61.7) 610 74.4 (67.7–81.1)
 Shock 550 37.5 (32.0–43.1) 375 68.2 (59.4–77.0)
 Acute renal failure 375 25.6 (20.6–30.6) 270 72.0 (61.5–82.5)
 Amniotic fluid embolism 245 16.7 (12.5–21.0) 140 57.1 (43.3–71.0)
 Acute heart failure 240 16.4 (12.2–20.6) 185 77.1 (65.2–89.0)
 Disseminated intravascular coagulation without transfusion 240 16.4 (12.1–20.6) 120 50.0 (35.8–64.2)
 Severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome 225 15.4 (11.2–19.5) 175 77.8 (65.6–89.9)
 Arrhythmia 180 12.3 (8.5–16.0) 140 77.8 (64.3–91.3)
 Sepsis 175 11.9 (8.3–15.6) 105 60.0 (43.7–76.3)
 Air or thrombotic embolism 140 9.6 (6.1–13.0) 105 75.0 (58.8–91.2)
 Severe anesthesia complications 135 9.2 (5.9–12.5) 135 100.0 (100.0–100.0)
 Peripartum cardiomyopathy 115 7.8 (4.8–10.9) 100 87.0 (73.2–100.0)
 Puerperal cerebrovascular disorders 80 5.5 (2.9–8.1) 55 68.8 (46.0–91.5)
 Acute myocardial infarction 65 4.4 (2.1–6.8) 50 76.9 (54.0–99.8)
Procedures/interventions
 Mechanical ventilation 780 53.2 (47.5–59.0) 560 71.8 (64.7–78.9)
 Hysterectomy 285 19.5 (14.8–24.1) 205 71.9 (59.7–84.1)
 Both transfusion and disseminated intravascular coagulation 230 15.7 (11.4–20.0) 125 54.3 (39.2–69.5)
 Transfusion without disseminated intravascular coagulation 215 14.7 (10.6–18.7) 165 76.7 (64.1–89.4)
 Temporary tracheostomy 110 7.5 (4.5–10.5) 100 90.9 (78.9–100.0)
 Conversion of cardiac rhythm 75 5.1 (2.6–7.6) 45 60.0 (35.3–84.7)

HELLP = hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count.

*

Data are from the National Inpatient Sample. Numbers are weighted. Estimates for aortic aneurysm or dissection and status asthmaticus are not presented to comply with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s data use agreement, which prohibits reporting estimates based on <11 observations. No cases of sickle cell crisis were identified among delivery hospitalizations with cardiac arrest.

Including cardiac arrest due to anesthesia during pregnancy.

DISCUSSION

During 2017 to 2019, cardiac arrest occurred in approximately 1 in 9000 U.S. delivery hospitalizations, and two thirds of these patients survived to hospital discharge. The rate of cardiac arrest and subsequent survival to hospital discharge remained stable during this 3-year period. Cardiac arrest was disproportionately more likely to occur in patients who were older, were Black, had Medicare or Medicaid, or had underlying medical conditions. Although acute respiratory distress syndrome was the most common co-occurring diagnosis, cardiac arrest rates were high among hospitalizations where a diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism was noted. Survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest was lowest with co-occurring DIC. However, we could not determine causality or identify whether co-occurring severe maternal complications preceded or followed cardiac arrest. We also could not distinguish the causes of cardiac arrests, including whether they were pregnancy-related complications or other underlying causes among pregnant women.

The rates of cardiac arrest during delivery hospitalization and survival to hospital discharge both remained stable during the study period but may have been higher than previously published estimates. During 1998 to 2011, cardiac arrest occurred in 1 in 12000 admissions for delivery (1), compared with 1 in 9000 delivery hospitalizations in our study using the same data source. The same earlier study reported an overall survival rate of 58.9% after cardiac arrest during hospital delivery in 1998 to 2011 (1), whereas we found that 68.6% of patients survived to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest. The transition from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM that occurred in 2015 creates challenges in comparing estimates (12). However, the higher rate of cardiac arrest may be related to the observed increased prevalence over time of characteristics associated with cardiac arrest, such as hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (13), heart disease (14), and hemorrhage (15). Survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest in the general adult U.S. population has also improved over time, increasing from 16.9% in 2000 to 26.7% in 2019 (16).

In our study, cardiac arrest was more common among delivery hospitalizations of patients who were older, were Black, had Medicare or Medicaid, or had underlying medical conditions. This is consistent with existing literature on maternal cardiac arrest (1, 1719). Although such risk factors as hypertensive disorders in pregnancy disproportionately affect Black patients (13), 1 study found that racial/ethnic differences in severe maternal morbidity persisted after accounting for comorbid conditions, cesarean delivery, and other factors (20). Strategies to address maternal cardiac arrest implemented with an equity lens may reduce disparities in maternal outcomes by addressing upstream factors associated with cardiac arrest incidence and management. For women with underlying medical conditions, prepregnancy counseling and coordinated care with a team of specialists could reduce severe complications (18). Clinical tools, such as the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative’s algorithm for symptomatic or high-risk pregnant and postpartum women (21), and education to raise awareness about urgent maternal warning signs (22) may increase recognition of cardiovascular complications and improve management.

Responding to maternal cardiac arrest is time-sensitive and complex (23). Although response to in-hospital cardiac arrest for pregnant women is similar to that for the general adult population (24), managing maternal cardiac arrest has additional considerations (for example, the effect of aortocaval compression on resuscitation). Guidance from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine outlines levels of maternal care and states that level III and IV facilities have the capabilities, including the personnel and equipment, to most appropriately care for persons with maternal cardiac conditions (for example, an onsite intensive care unit for obstetric patients with primary or comanagement by a maternal–fetal medicine team) (25). Effective response often requires coordination of care across specialties, in addition to access to equipment for basic life support, defibrillation, and airway management and specialized equipment specific to maternal cardiac arrest (for example, emergency cesarean delivery tray) (11, 26). There may be opportunities for increasing knowledge about maternal cardiac arrest or improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation technique for pregnant people (27). Studies have shown that simulation-based training on advanced cardiac life support combining a standardized curriculum and intense deliberate practice significantly increased adherence to clinical guidelines (28, 29).

This study is subject to several limitations. First, delivery hospitalizations, cardiac arrest, and maternal medical conditions were identified using claims codes and are subject to inherent challenges and coding errors, and ICD-10-CM codes for cardiac arrest among pregnant patients have not been validated. We also did not have information about the primary indication for hospitalization (that is, a hospitalization for delivery in which a cardiac arrest occurred vs. a hospitalization for cardiac arrest that necessitated a delivery) or the temporality of events occurring during the delivery hospitalization (that is, the timing of the cardiac arrest relative to the delivery or other maternal complications). However, we suspect that the cause of the arrest is likely a more important driver of survivability than the sequential order of the delivery versus the cardiac arrest. Second, we could not assess trends in cardiac arrest before 2017 because of the coding transition from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015. Third, we did not have information on prenatal care, family and personal history of cardiovascular disease, neurologically intact survival after cardiac arrest, or fetal or neonatal outcomes. Thus, we could not evaluate survival by patient- or community-level characteristics because of the limited number of deaths among delivery hospitalizations with cardiac arrest. Finally, this study did not include cardiac arrest occurring outside delivery hospitalizations and does not represent all maternal cardiac arrests.

Cardiac arrest affected an estimated 1 in 9000 delivery hospitalizations, higher than previously published estimates. More information is needed on specific drivers of cardiac arrest frequency, including race and ethnicity; underlying medical conditions; and other patient-, hospital-, and community-level characteristics. Although nearly 7 in 10 women with cardiac arrest during delivery hospitalization survived to hospital discharge, survival was lowest among patients with co-occurring DIC. Implementing clinical guidelines, ensuring that pregnant people receive risk-appropriate care, and addressing potential knowledge deficits in maternal cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation technique for pregnant people may improve maternal outcomes.

Supplementary Material

M22-2750_Supplement

Footnotes

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Disclosures: Authors have reported no disclosures of interest. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M22-2750.

Reproducible Research Statement: Study protocol: Not available. Statistical code: Available from Dr. Ford (e-mail, yex9@cdc.gov). Data set: Available from HCUP at www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/tech_assist/centdist.jsp.

See also:

Web-Only

Supplement

Contributor Information

Nicole D. Ford, Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Carla L. DeSisto, Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Romeo R. Galang, Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Elena V. Kuklina, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Laurence S. Sperling, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Jean Y. Ko, Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and U.S. Public Health Service, Commissioned Corps, Rockville, Maryland.

References

  • 1.Mhyre JM, Tsen LC, Einav S, et al. Cardiac arrest during hospitalization for delivery in the United States, 1998–2011. Anesthesiology 2014;120:810–8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. How does CDC identify severe maternal morbidity? Updated 26 December 2019. Accessed at www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/smm/severe-morbidity-ICD.htm on 10 February 2023.
  • 3.Obstetric care consensus no. 5: severe maternal morbidity: screening and review. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:e54–e60. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dzakpasu S, Deb-Rinker P, Arbour L, et al. Severe maternal morbidity surveillance: monitoring pregnant women at high risk for prolonged hospitalisation and death. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2020;34:427–439. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUP National Inpatient Sample 2021.
  • 6.Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Federally Available Data (FAD) Resource Document 2 September 2022.
  • 7.Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. NIS description of data elements: RACE - race/ethnicity of patient September 2008. Accessed at www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/race/nisnote.jsp on 10 February 2023.
  • 8.Ingram DD, Franco SJ. 2013. NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties. Vital Health Stat 2. 2014:1–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Handley SC, Passarella M, Herrick HM, et al. Birth volume and geographic distribution of US hospitals with obstetric services from 2010 to 2018. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2125373. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arany Z, Elkayam U. Peripartum cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2016;133:1397–409. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jeejeebhoy FM, Zelop CM, Lipman S, et al. ; American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee, Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation, Council on Cardiovascular Diseases in the Young, and Council on Clinical Cardiology. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015;132:1747–73. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gibson T, Casto A, Young J, et al. Impact of ICD-10-CM/PCS on Research Using Administrative Databases. HCUP methods series report 2016–02 U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ford ND, Cox S, Ko JY, et al. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and mortality at delivery hospitalization — United States, 2017–2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:585–591. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7117a1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Elkayam U, Goland S, Pieper PG, et al. High-risk cardiac disease in pregnancy: part I. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:396–410. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Reale SC, Easter SR, Xu X, et al. Trends in postpartum hemorrhage in the United States from 2010 to 2014. Anesth Analg 2020;130:e119–e122. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, et al. ; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021;143:e254–e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zelop CM, Einav S, Mhyre JM, et al. ; American Heart Association’s Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation Investigators. Characteristics and outcomes of maternal cardiac arrest: a descriptive analysis of Get with the Guidelines data. Resuscitation 2018;132:17–20. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.08.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Presidential Task Force on Pregnancy and Heart Disease and Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 212: pregnancy and heart disease. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:e320–e356. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 203: chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:e26–e50. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Leonard SA, Main EK, Scott KA, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity prevalence and trends. Ann Epidemiol 2019;33:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.02.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. Improving Health Care Response to Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy and Postpartum November 2017. Accessed at www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CFH/DMCAH/RPPC/CDPHDocumentLibrary/CMQCC_CVD_Toolkit.pdf on 10 February 2023.
  • 22.Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Hear Her 2022. Accessed at www.cdc.gov/hearher/index.html on 10 February 2023.
  • 23.Kikuchi J, Deering S. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 2018;42:33–38. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Merchant RM, Topjian AA, Panchal AR, et al. ; Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support, Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support, Neonatal Life Support, Resuscitation Education Science, and Systems of Care Writing Groups. Part 1: executive summary: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2020;142:S337–S357. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Levels of maternal care: obstetric care consensus no, 9. Obstet Gynecol 2019;134:e41–e55. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.ACOG practice bulletin no. 211 summary: critical care in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:1063–1066. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cohen SE, Andes LC, Carvalho B. Assessment of knowledge regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation of pregnant women. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008;17:20–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Didwania A, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, et al. Progress toward improving the quality of cardiac arrest medical team responses at an academic teaching hospital. J Grad Med Educ 2011;3:211–6. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00144.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wayne DB, Didwania A, Feinglass J, et al. Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses at an academic teaching hospital: a case-control study. Chest 2008;133:56–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

M22-2750_Supplement

RESOURCES