Abstract
Progesterone (P) enhances spermatozoal hyperactivation, a capacitation event. Hyperactivation is associated with successful in vitro fertilization (IVF). In this study, we examined the effects of P on hyperactivation and IVF in mice. P enhanced spermatozoal hyperactivation and increased IVF success rate in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, P affected spermatozoal hyperactivation and IVF through the membrane progesterone receptor of the spermatozoal head. These results show that P regulates spermatozoal capacitation and fertilization in mice. The concentration of P changes during the estrous cycle, indicating that spermatozoa are capacitated in response to the oviductal environment and subsequently fertilize the oocyte.
Keywords: Capacitation, Hyperactivation, In vitro fertilization, Progesterone, Spermatozoon
Mammalian spermatozoa bind to oocytes after the process of capacitation [1], during which they undergo hyperactivation of the flagellum and acrosome reaction (AR) at the head. Hyperactivation provides specialized motility for penetrating the oocyte envelope [1,2,3]. The AR is an exocytosis process that releases hydrolases for digestion of the oocyte envelope [1]. Albumin, Ca2+, and HCO3– play important roles when spermatozoa are capacitated in vitro [1,2,3,4,5]. Spermatozoa cannot be hyperactivated in the absence of albumin and Ca2+ [4, 5]. Albumin removes cholesterol from the surface of the spermatozoon [6] and induces an influx of Ca2+ by stimulating the CatSper Ca2+ channel, which is an important Ca2+ channel for hyperactivation [7, 8]. The CatSper Ca2+ channel is activated by protein kinase A (PKA) in mouse spermatozoa but not in human spermatozoa [9, 10]. Ca2+ and HCO3– regulate soluble adenylate cyclases, protein kinases, and protein phosphatases, resulting in protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation [1, 3, 11,12,13,14,15].
Progesterone (P) and 17β-estradiol (Eβ) are released from the ovary and regulate oviductal physiology and fertilization, thereby changing the oviductal environment [16]. In addition, changes of the oviductal environment affect gamete transport, interactions between the spermatozoon and oviduct, spermatozoal physiology, oocytic physiology, and fertilization [16, 17]. It was reported that some oviductal hormones and neurotransmitters, such as P, melatonin (Mel), serotonin (5-hydroxytryptaine, 5-HT), Eβ, and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) regulate spermatozoal capacitation [18,19,20,21,22,23]. Among these, P is a popular effector of AR and hyperactivation in mammalian spermatozoa [18, 19, 24]. As for AR, after P binds to the membrane progesterone receptor (mPR) of the spermatozoal head, it induces the influx of Ca2+ via the CatSper Ca2+ channel and increases intracellular Ca2+ concentration [22, 25, 26]. Phospholipase C (PLC) and PKA are also involved in P-induced AR [27, 28]. Although AR is regulated by common mechanisms in mammalian spermatozoa, there are differences in the regulatory mechanisms of hyperactivation between human spermatozoa and other mammalian (at least rodent) spermatozoa [8,9,10, 19, 29, 30]. In human spermatozoa, P directly stimulates the CatSper Ca2+ channel and induces hyperactivation [19, 29, 30], whereas P indirectly stimulates the CatSper Ca2+ channel in mice; however, hyperactivation occurs via activation of the CatSper Ca2+ channel by PKA [8, 9]. In humans, PKA is not involved in the activation of the CatSper Ca2+ channel [10]. In hamsters, P enhances hyperactivation and penetration [5, 31]. Additionally, P stimulates the mPR, resulting in the activation of PLC, inositol 1, 4, 5-trisphosphate receptor-gated Ca2+ stores, PKA, and protein kinase C [5, 32]. Although the specific relationship between P and CatSper Ca2+ channels remains unknown, the CatSper Ca2+ channel is involved in the hyperactivation of hamster spermatozoa [33]. The effective concentration of P for hyperactivation differs from that for AR induction [5, 22, 24, 25, 28,29,30]. AR is induced by a concentration in μg/ml (or μM) of P [22, 24, 25, 28], while hyperactivation is induced by lower concentrations (ng/ml or nM) of P [5, 29, 30]. Moreover, a concentration of 20 ng/ml of P increases penetration; however, it does not induce AR in hamster spermatozoa [31].
Because the ability of hyperactivation is correlated with in vitro fertilization (IVF) success in humans [34], the success rate of IVF can be increased by amplifying the number of hyperactivated spermatozoa using oviductal hormones and neurotransmitters, such as P, among others. However, P does not increase the success rate of IVF in humans [34]. Recently, 5-HT has been shown to enhance sperm hyperactivation and increase IVF success in mice [35]. As the effect of P on mouse spermatozoal hyperactivation differs from that of P on human spermatozoal hyperactivation [8,9,10, 19, 29, 30], P may enhance sperm hyperactivation and thus increase the success rate of IVF in mice. In the present study, we examined whether P enhances spermatozoal hyperactivation and increases the success rate of IVF.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
Bovine serum albumin (BSA), P, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), BSA-conjugated P (FITC/BAS-P), and RU486 (mifepristone) were purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG; Serotropin®) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; Gonatropin®) were purchased from ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Other reagent-grade chemicals were purchased from the FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation (Osaka, Japan).
Animals
ICR mice were bred at the Research Center for Laboratory Animals of the Dokkyo Medical University. The mice were maintained in an environment of 25°C under a 12-h light/dark cycle. This study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the university (experimental permission number: 0107) and was performed in accordance with the university guidelines for animal experimentation.
Preparation of hyperactivated spermatozoa
Spermatozoa were collected from the cauda epididymis of male mice (10–20-week-old). Hyperactivated spermatozoa were prepared as previously described [12] with some modifications. Modified Tyrode’s albumin lactate pyruvate (mTALP) medium [36] was used as the capacitation medium. The cauda epididymis was pricked with a 26 G (0.45 mm) needle (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and a drop of sperm was obtained. A drop (approximately 3 μl) of cauda epididymis spermatozoa was placed on a culture dish (35 mm diameter; Iwaki, Asahi Glass Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and 3 ml of medium was added to the dish. The spermatozoa were incubated for 5 min at 37°C for activation. The supernatant containing motile sperm was placed in a new dish containing vehicle or RU486. After incubation for 5 min, the supernatant was transferred to a new dish containing the vehicle, P, or FITC/BSA-P. Spermatozoa were incubated for 4 h at 37°C and 5% CO2 to induce hyperactivation. To prepare the stock solutions, P (20 μg/ml) and RU486 (23.4 mM) were dissolved in ethanol. The FITC/BSA-P (7 μM) was dissolved in pure water. For all the experiments, the maximum concentration of the vehicle (ethanol and pure water) was 0.2%.
Measurements of motility and hyperactivation
The motility and hyperactivation were measured as previously described [35]. The movement of motile spermatozoa was recorded on a DVD recorder (RDR-HX50; Sony Corp., Tokyo, Japan) using a CCD camera (Progressive 3CCD, Sony) attached to a microscope (IX70; Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) with phase-contrast illumination in a small CO2 incubator (MI-IBC; Olympus). Observations were performed at 37°C for 1 min. A visual analysis of the movie included manual counts of the number of total, motile, and hyperactivated spermatozoa in 10 different fields. For all the experiments, visual analyses were performed in a blinded manner. Motile spermatozoa exhibiting asymmetric and whiplash-like flagellar movements were considered to be hyperactivated [18, 35]. The percentages of motility and hyperactivation were defined as the number of motile spermatozoa/total spermatozoa × 100 and the number of hyperactivated spermatozoa/total spermatozoa × 100, respectively. Each experiment was repeated four times using four mice. If the proportion of motile spermatozoa was ≤ 80%, the experiment was repeated.
Motility kinetic analysis using the sperm motility analysis system (SMAS)
Motility kinetics were evaluated using SMAS for animals (Ver. 3.18) with the loaded parameter file mouse_BM10×_640 nm_Bright59_150fps-shutter200.ini (Ditect Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) as previously described [35]. The spermatozoa were hyperactivated in the presence or absence of P according to the methodology provided in the section “preparation of hyperactivated spermatozoa”. After incubation for 2 h, the suspension containing motile spermatozoa (15 μl) was transferred to an observation chamber (0.1 mm deep, 18 mm wide, and 18 mm long) made of mending tape attached to the glass slide in two parallel strips, which were covered with a cover glass. Spermatozoal movement was recorded for 1 s on the hard disk drive of the SMAS using a high-speed digital camera (HAS-L2; Ditect) attached to a microscope (ECLIPSE E2000; Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan) with phase-contrast illumination, 650 nm band-pass filter, and warm plate (MP10DM; Kitazato Corp., Shizuoka, Japan). SMAS analyzed 150 consecutive images obtained from a single field at 10 × magnification with a negative phase contrast. SMAS automatically calculated the straight-line velocity (VSL; μm/sec), curvilinear velocity (VCL; μm/sec), average-path velocity (VAP; μm/sec), linearity (LIN), straightness (STR), amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH; μm), and beat-cross frequency (BCF; Hz) using the manually calculated wobbler coefficient (WOB; defined as VAP/VCL) [37]. The SMAS analysis was repeated four times using four different mice. In each experiment, more than 300 spermatozoa were detected. Only motile spermatozoa judged to be significant were analyzed.
IVF
IVF was performed according to a previously described method [35] with some modifications. The superovulation treatment was carried out as follows: female mice (age: 8–12 weeks) were intraperitoneally (i.p.) administered 10 units of PMSG at 1600 h three days before IVF was conducted, followed by 10 units of hCG (i.p.) at 1630 h one day before IVF was performed. At 0950 h on the day IVF was performed, one drop (approximately 3 μl) of the dense mass of spermatozoa obtained from the cauda epididymis of male mice (age: 10–20 weeks) was mixed with 300 μl drops of mTALP medium in the presence or absence of the vehicle, P, and RU486. The spermatozoa (approximately 2 × 107 cells/ml) were incubated for 1 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. The eggs were collected at 1030 h on the day of IVF (18 h after hCG injection) from the PMSG/hCG-treated female mice. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were dissected from the ampullae of both oviducts and incubated with 300 μl drops of mTALP medium in the presence or absence of the vehicle, P, and RU486. At 1050 h on the day of IVF, 10 μl of the suspension containing pre-incubated spermatozoa was added to the medium containing COCs to start the insemination process. Notably, the final spermatozoal concentration was 6.7 × 105 cell/ml. Spermatozoa and COCs were incubated together for 0.5 or 5 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. After incubation, the eggs and COCs were collected and washed with mTALP medium in the presence or absence of the vehicle, P, and RU486 to remove the spermatozoa and cumulus cells from the medium, and insemination was terminated. After washing, the eggs and COCs were re-incubated, observed at 1600 h on the day of IVF using a stereoscopic microscope (SMZ-10; Nikon Solutions Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and the total number of eggs was manually counted. The eggs and COCs were re-observed at 1600 h on the day after IVF using a stereoscopic microscope. The two-cell embryos were counted manually. The percentage of two-cell embryos was defined as follows: number of two-cell embryos/total number of eggs × 100. The analyses were performed in a blinded manner. The experiments were performed four times with four different male and female mice.
Ligand binding assays of P
Ligand binding assays of P were performed as previously described [5, 38], with some modifications. A drop (approximately 3 μl) of cauda epididymis spermatozoa was placed on the culture dish, to which 3 ml of medium was added, followed by incubation for 5 min to allow the spermatozoa to swim up. The sperm suspension was placed in a new dish containing either the vehicle or RU486. After incubation for 5 min, the sperm suspension was replaced with a new dish containing the vehicle or FITC/BSA-P. After incubation for 5 min, several microliters of the supernatant were placed on a glass slide without fluorescence and observed using a CCD camera (WARYCAM-CIX2000; WAYMER INC., Osaka, Japan) attached to a light microscope (IX70; Olympus) with phase-contrast illumination and a fluorescence unit.
Statistical Analysis
The data consisting of two groups, as shown in Fig. 1, were statistically analyzed via the Student’s t-test using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Japan, Tokyo, Japan). When the data consisted of four groups, as shown in Figs. 2, 3, and 4, they were statistically analyzed via a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc test (Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) test) using Microsoft Excel with the add-on: ystat2018 (Igakutosho Shuppan, Saitama, Japan). A P-value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Fig. 1.
Effects of progesterone (P) on spermatozoal motility, hyperactivation, motility kinetics, and in vitro fertilization (IVF). The percentages of motility (A) and hyperactivation (B) of spermatozoa when cultured for 4 h in the presence and absence of 20 ng/ml of P. (C) The motility kinetics of spermatozoa when cultured at 2 h in the presence and absence of 20 ng/ml of P. (D) The percentages of two-cell embryos when IVF was performed in the medium with 20 ng/ml of P. The data represent the mean ± standard deviation. In (A), (B), (C), and (D), (Vehicle) medium with 0.1% ethanol as vehicle; (20 ng/ml P) medium with 20 ng/ml of P and vehicle. * Significant difference compared with “Vehicle” (P < 0.05).
Results
Effects of P on hyperactivation and IVF
A concentration of 20 ng/ml of P enhanced the hyperactivation of hamster spermatozoa [5]; therefore, we examined whether the concentration of 20 ng/ml of P enhanced the hyperactivation of mouse spermatozoa in this study. As shown in Figs. 1A and B, 20 ng/ml of P significantly increased the percentage of hyperactivated spermatozoa after incubation for 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 h but did not affect the percentage of motile spermatozoa. As for the motility kinetics, after incubation for 2 h, 20 ng/ml of P significantly decreased VSL, LIN, and ALH but did not affect the VCL, VAP, STR, BCF, and WOB (Fig. 1C).
As 5-HT increased the success rate of IVF via the enhancement of hyperactivation in mouse spermatozoa [35], we examined the effects of 20 ng/ml of P on the success of IVF in mice (Fig. 1D). When spermatozoa and COCs were co-incubated for 5 h, 20 ng/ml of P did not affect IVF success. However, 20 ng/ml of P significantly increased the success rate of IVF when spermatozoa and COCs were co-incubated for 0.5 h.
Dose-dependent effects of P on spermatozoa hyperactivation and IVF
In hamsters, P enhances spermatozoal hyperactivation in a dose-dependent manner [5]. As shown in Figs. 2A and B, P increased the percentage of hyperactivated spermatozoa after incubation for 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 h in a dose-dependent manner; however, it did not affect the percentage of motile spermatozoa. Specifically, 10 ng/ml of P did not affect the percentage of hyperactivated spermatozoa, while 20 ng/ml of P significantly increased the percentage of hyperactivated spermatozoa after incubation for 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 h. Moreover, 40 ng/ml of P significantly increased the percentage of hyperactivated spermatozoa after incubation for 1.5 and 2 h. The effect of 20 ng/ml of P was consistently observed to be higher than that of 40 ng/ml of P, although there was no significant difference between the effects of 20 ng/ml and 40 ng/ml of P.
Fig. 2.
Dose-dependent effects of P on spermatozoal motility, hyperactivation, and IVF. The percentages of motility (A) and hyperactivation (B) of spermatozoa when cultured for 4 h in the presence and absence of P (10, 20, and 40 ng/ml). (C) The percentages of two-cell embryos when IVF was performed in the medium with 10, 20, and 40 ng/ml of P. Spermatozoa and COCs were co-incubated for 0.5 h. The data represent the mean ± standard deviation. In (A), (B), and (C), (Vehicle) medium with 0.2% ethanol as vehicle; (10 ng/ml P) medium with 10 ng/ml of P and vehicle; (20 ng/ml P) medium with 20 ng/ml of P and vehicle; (40 ng/ml P) medium with 40 ng/ml of P and vehicle. * Significant difference compared with “Vehicle” and “10 ng/ml P” (P < 0.05). ** Significant difference compared with “Vehicle” (P < 0.05). *** Significant difference compared with “Vehicle”, “10 ng/ml P”, and “40 ng/mL P” (P < 0.05).
Notably, 20 ng/ml of P significantly increased the success rate of IVF, while 10 and 40 ng/ml of P did not affect the success rate of IVF (Fig. 2C).
Involvement of the progesterone receptor (PR) in P-enhanced spermatozoa hyperactivation and IVF
Generally, P enters the cell and binds to an intracellular PR to perform various functions [19,20,21]. In hamster spermatozoa, P enhances hyperactivation via PR [5], although in human spermatozoa, P induces hyperactivation without PR [19, 29, 30]. Therefore, we examined whether P enhances hyperactivation via PR in mouse spermatozoa. As shown in Figs. 3A and B, the increase in the percentage of hyperactivated spermatozoa by P was significantly inhibited by RU486 (a PR antagonist); however, RU486 did not affect the percentage of motile spermatozoa. Moreover, the increase in IVF success induced by P was significantly inhibited by RU486 treatment (Fig. 3C).
Fig. 3.
Involvement of the progesterone receptor (PR) in the regulation of hyperactivation and IVF. The percentages of motility (A) and hyperactivation (B) of spermatozoa when cultured for 4 h in the presence of 20 ng/ml of P and 23.4 μM of RU486. (C) The percentages of two-cell embryos when IVF was performed in the medium with 20 ng/ml of P and 23.4 μM of RU486. Spermatozoa and COCs were co-incubated for 0.5 h. The data represent the mean ± standard deviation. In (A), (B), and (C), (Vehicle) medium with 0.2% ethanol as vehicle; (P) medium with 20 ng/ml of P and vehicle; (RU486) medium with 23.4 μM RU486 and vehicle; (P + RU486) medium with 20 ng/ml of P, 23.4 μM of RU486, and vehicle. * Significant difference compared with “Vehicle”, “RU486”, and “P + RU486” (P < 0.05). ** Significant difference compared with “RU486” and “P + RU486” (P < 0.05).
In mammalian spermatozoa, P binds to the mPR [5, 19, 22]. P enters the cell, binds to intracellular PR, and induces gene expression [20, 21], although FITC/BSA-P cannot enter the cell because BSA blocks the cellular entry of P [39]. Therefore, the effects of FITC/BSA-P occur via non-genomic regulation without gene expression [20, 21, 25, 40, 41]. FITC/BSA-P at 7 nM, which is equivalent to 20 ng/ml of P, significantly increased the percentage of hyperactivated spermatozoa after incubation for 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 h but did not affect the percentage of motile spermatozoa (Figs. 4A and B). The increase in the percentage of hyperactivated spermatozoa induced by FITC/BSA-P was significantly inhibited by RU486 treatment (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 4.
Involvement of the membrane PR in the enhancement of hyperactivation by P. The percentages of motility (A) and hyperactivation (B) of spermatozoa when cultured for 4 h in the presence of 7 nM of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/bovine serum albumin (BSA)-P and 23.4 μM of RU486. FITC/BSA-P (7 nM) is equivalent to approximately 20 ng/ml of P. The data represent the mean ± standard deviation. In (A) and (B), (Vehicle) medium with 0.1% pure water and 0.1% ethanol as vehicle; (FITC/BSA-P) medium with 7 nM of FITC/BSA-P and vehicle; (RU486) medium with 23.4 μM RU486 and vehicle; (FITC/BSA-P + RU486) medium with 7 nM of FITC/BSA-P, 23.4 μM of RU486, and vehicle. * Significant difference compared with “Vehicle”, “RU486”, and “FITC/BSA-P + RU486” (P < 0.05). ** Significant difference compared with “RU486” and “FITC/BSA-P + RU486” (P < 0.05).
In hamsters and humans, P binds to the spermatozoal head [5, 38, 40]. As shown in Figs. 5A, 5A’, 5B, and 5B’, FITC/BSA-P bound to the head of mouse spermatozoa. Moreover, the binding of FITC/BSA-P was inhibited by RU486 (Figs. 5C, 5C’, 5D, and 5D’).
Fig. 5.
Binding of P to the spermatozoal head. (A, A’, B, and B’) Mouse spermatozoa were incubated in the modified Tyrode’s albumin lactate pyruvate (mTALP) medium with 7 nM of FITC/BSA-P, which is equivalent to approximately 20 ng/mL of P, and 0.1% ethanol. (C, C’, D, and D’) Mouse spermatozoa were incubated in the mTALP medium with 7 nM of FITC/BSA-P, 23.4 μM RU486, and 0.1% ethanol. (E and E’) Mouse spermatozoa were incubated in the mTALP medium with 23.4 μM of RU486, 0.1% pure water, and 0.1% ethanol. (F and F’) Mouse spermatozoa were incubated in the mTALP medium with 0.1% pure water and 0.1% ethanol. (A–F) Observed under a light field; (A’–F’) Observed under a fluorescent field. The arrow heads indicate the spermatozoal heads. Bar represents 100 μm.
Discussion
Hyperactivation is a capacitation event related to fertilization [1, 3]. In addition, some oviductal hormones and neurotransmitters regulate hyperactivation [18, 19, 23]. P, Mel, and 5-HT can induce and dose-dependently enhance sperm hyperactivation [4, 5, 29, 30, 33, 35, 42, 43]. In contrast, Eβ dose-dependently suppresses the enhancement of hyperactivation by P and Mel [38, 44, 45]. Moreover, the enhancement rate of hyperactivation depends on the P and Eβ concentrations in hamsters [44]. Although GABA acts as an inducer in human spermatozoa [46], it also suppresses the enhancement of hyperactivation by P and 5-HT in hamster spermatozoa [47, 48]. In hamsters, P increases spermatozoal penetration [31]. Moreover, 5-HT increases the success of IVF in mice [35].
In this study, we examined the effects of P on hyperactivation and IVF success in mice. P significantly enhanced hyperactivation in a dose-dependent manner (Figs. 1 and 2). Moreover, 20 ng/ml of P was the most effective concentration. P affected hyperactivation via mPR at the spermatozoal head (Figs. 3, 4, 5). These results suggest that the effects of P on spermatozoa are due to non-genomic regulation by mPR. Additionally, 20 ng/ml of P increased the rate of IVF success (Figs. 1 and 2), and 20 ng/ml of P increased penetration but did not induce AR in hamsters [31], suggesting that P increases the hyperactivation, penetration, and success rate of IVF in mice. As AR is generally induced by the zona pellucida [28], it may have been induced by the zone pellucida in the present study. In contrast, although 40 ng/ml of P enhanced hyperactivation, it did not affect the success rate of IVF (Fig. 2). The enhancement of hyperactivation by 40 ng/ml of P had a large fluctuation in rates. Therefore, the increase in IVF success rate may be unstable.
Generally, the concentrations of P in serum, follicular fluids, and oviductal fluids change according to the estrous cycle. In hamsters, the concentrations of P in serum and follicular fluids ranged between 5.64–12.85 ng/ml and 4.2–7.4 μg/ml during the periovulatory period [49]. Moreover, the concentration of P in oviductal fluids ranged between 44.01–175.06 ng/ml during the periovulatory period [49]. Additionally, in rodents, P dose-dependently affected the spermatozoal physiology involved in capacitation and fertilization in vitro. In hamsters, the concentration of 20 ng/ml of P increased spermatozoal penetration and enhanced hyperactivation [5, 31]. Similarly, in mice, the concentration of 20 ng/ml of P enhanced spermatozoal hyperactivation and increased IVF success (Figs. 1 and 2). These findings suggest that spermatozoal function and fertilization are controlled by the oviductal environment of P in rodents. The oviductal environment consists of several chemicals, including P, Mel, 5-HT, Eβ, and GABA, which change according to the estrous cycles and affect fertilization-associated events of spermatozoa and oocytes [16,17,18,19, 31]. Moreover, Mel enhances spermatozoal hyperactivation [4]. The enhancement of spermatozoal hyperactivation by P and Mel is suppressed by Eβ in a dose dependent manner [38, 44, 45] and that by P and 5-HT is suppressed by GABA in the dose dependent manner [47, 48]. However, the detailed effects and regulatory mechanisms of these hormones and neurotransmitters on spermatozoal hyperactivation and IVF success are unknown. Therefore, these issues should be examined in future studies.
In a human study [34], although hyperactivation was involved in the success rate of IVF, P-induced hyperactivation did not affect the rate of IVF success. In mice, P- and 5-HT-enhanced hyperactivation affected the rate of IVF success (Fig. 1) [35]. P and 5-HT did not affect the success rate of IVF when mouse spermatozoa and COCs were co-incubated for 5 h but increased the success rate when they were co-incubated for 0.5 h (Fig. 1) [35]. Since mouse spermatozoa were incubated for 1 h before co-incubation with COCs [Materials and Methods], the 0.5-h co-incubation of spermatozoa and COCs corresponded to the 1.5-h incubation of spermatozoa. When mouse spermatozoa were incubated for 1.5 h in the presence of P or 5-HT, the percentage of hyperactivation was significantly increased (Fig. 1) [35]. Therefore, P and 5-HT could potentially increase the success rate of IVF and enhance spermatozoal hyperactivation.
Upon the hyperactivation of the spermatozoon, there is a change in the motility kinetics because the motion trajectory of the spermatozoon changes significantly [37, 50]. When mouse spermatozoa were incubated for 2 h, P-enhanced hyperactivation was associated with a decrease in VSL, LIN, and ALH (Fig. 1C). In a previous study using hamsters [51], P-enhanced hyperactivation was related to a decrease in VSL when spermatozoa were incubated for 2 h. A decrease in VSL may be a common response to P-enhanced hyperactivation in rodent spermatozoa.
In conclusion, P enhances hyperactivation via the mPR in mice. In addition, the success of mouse IVF is increased by artificial spermatozoal hyperactivation induced by P. Notably, P shortened the co-incubation times of spermatozoa and COCs compared to the normal IVF method.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by a Research Grant Award 2021 of Dokkyo International Medical Education and Research Foundation (to MF) and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (No. 18K09204 and 21K09435 to MF) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).
References
- 1.Florman HM, Fissore RA. Fertilization in mammals. In: Plant TM, Zeleznik AJ (ed.), Knobil and Neill’s Physiology of Reproduction. Vol 1. London: Elsevier Inc.; 2015: 149–196. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Toshimori K, Eddy EM. The spermatozoon. In: Plant TM, Zeleznik AJ (ed.), Knobil and Neill’s Physiology of Reproduction. Vol 1. London: Elsevier Inc.; 2015: 99–148. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Harayama H. Flagellar hyperactivation of bull and boar spermatozoa. Reprod Med Biol 2018; 17: 442–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fujinoki M. Melatonin-enhanced hyperactivation of hamster sperm. Reproduction 2008; 136: 533–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Noguchi T, Fujinoki M, Kitazawa M, Inaba N. Regulation of hyperactivation of hamster spermatozoa by progesterone. Reprod Med Biol 2008; 7: 63–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Langlais J, Roberts KD. A molecular membrane model of sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction of mammalian spermatozoa. Gamete Res 1985; 12: 183–224. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xia J, Ren D. The BSA-induced Ca2+ influx during sperm capacitation is CATSPER channel-dependent. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2009; 7: 119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ren D, Navarro B, Perez G, Jackson AC, Hsu S, Shi Q, Tilly JL, Clapham DE. A sperm ion channel required for sperm motility and male fertility. Nature 2001; 413: 603–609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Orta G, de la Vega-Beltran JL, Martín-Hidalgo D, Santi CM, Visconti PE, Darszon A. CatSper channels are regulated by protein kinase A. J Biol Chem 2018; 293: 16830–16841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang T, Young S, Krenz H, Tüttelmann F, Röpke A, Krallmann C, Kliesch S, Zeng XH, Brenker C, Strünker T. The Ca2+ channel CatSper is not activated by cAMP/PKA signaling but directly affected by chemicals used to probe the action of cAMP and PKA. J Biol Chem 2020; 295: 13181–13193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Visconti PE, Muschietti JP, Flawia MM, Tezon JG. Bicarbonate dependence of cAMP accumulation induced by phorbol esters in hamster spermatozoa. Biochim Biophys Acta 1990; 1054: 231–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fujinoki M, Suzuki T, Takayama T, Shibahara H, Ohtake H. Profiling of proteins phosphorylated or dephosphorylated during hyperactivation via activation on hamster spermatozoa. Reprod Med Biol 2006; 5: 123–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Xie F, Garcia MA, Carlson AE, Schuh SM, Babcock DF, Jaiswal BS, Gossen JA, Esposito G, van Duin M, Conti M. Soluble adenylyl cyclase (sAC) is indispensable for sperm function and fertilization. Dev Biol 2006; 296: 353–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Suzuki T, Fujinoki M, Shibahara H, Suzuki M. Regulation of hyperactivation by PPP2 in hamster spermatozoa. Reproduction 2010; 139: 847–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wertheimer E, Krapf D, de la Vega-Beltran JL, Sánchez-Cárdenas C, Navarrete F, Haddad D, Escoffier J, Salicioni AM, Levin LR, Buck J, Mager J, Darszon A, Visconti PE. Compartmentalization of distinct cAMP signaling pathways in mammalian sperm. J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 35307–35320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Coy P, García-Vázquez FA, Visconti PE, Avilés M. Roles of the oviduct in mammalian fertilization. Reproduction 2012; 144: 649–660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lamy J, Corbin E, Blache MC, Garanina AS, Uzbekov R, Mermillod P, Saint-Dizier M. Steroid hormones regulate sperm-oviduct interactions in the bovine. Reproduction 2017; 154: 497–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fujinoki M, Takei GL, Kon H. Non-genomic regulation and disruption of spermatozoal in vitro hyperactivation by oviductal hormones. J Physiol Sci 2016; 66: 207–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tamburrino L, Marchiani S, Muratori M, Luconi M, Baldi E. Progesterone, spermatozoa and reproduction: An updated review. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2020; 516: 110952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Baldi E, Luconi M, Bonaccorsi L, Forti G. Nongenomic effects of progesterone on spermatozoa: mechanisms of signal transduction and clinical implications. Front Biosci 1998; 3: D1051–D1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lösel R, Wehling M. Nongenomic actions of steroid hormones. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003; 4: 46–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Baldi E, Luconi M, Muratori M, Marchiani S, Tamburrino L, Forti G. Nongenomic activation of spermatozoa by steroid hormones: facts and fictions. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2009; 308: 39–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fujinoki M. Non-genomic regulation of mammalian sperm hyperactivation. Reprod Med Biol 2009; 8: 47–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Osman RA, Andria ML, Jones AD, Meizel S. Steroid induced exocytosis: the human sperm acrosome reaction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1989; 160: 828–833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Luconi M, Francavilla F, Porazzi I, Macerola B, Forti G, Baldi E. Human spermatozoa as a model for studying membrane receptors mediating rapid nongenomic effects of progesterone and estrogens. Steroids 2004; 69: 553–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tamburrino L, Marchiani S, Minetti F, Forti G, Muratori M, Baldi E. The CatSper calcium channel in human sperm: relation with motility and involvement in progesterone-induced acrosome reaction. Hum Reprod 2014; 29: 418–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Harrison DA, Carr DW, Meizel S. Involvement of protein kinase A and A kinase anchoring protein in the progesterone-initiated human sperm acrosome reaction. Biol Reprod 2000; 62: 811–820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fukami K, Yoshida M, Inoue T, Kurokawa M, Fissore RA, Yoshida N, Mikoshiba K, Takenawa T. Phospholipase Cdelta4 is required for Ca2+ mobilization essential for acrosome reaction in sperm. J Cell Biol 2003; 161: 79–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lishko PV, Botchkina IL, Kirichok Y. Progesterone activates the principal Ca2+ channel of human sperm. Nature 2011; 471: 387–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Strünker T, Goodwin N, Brenker C, Kashikar ND, Weyand I, Seifert R, Kaupp UB. The CatSper channel mediates progesterone-induced Ca2+ influx in human sperm. Nature 2011; 471: 382–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Libersky EA, Boatman DE. Effects of progesterone on in vitro sperm capacitation and egg penetration in the golden hamster. Biol Reprod 1995; 53: 483–487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fujinoki M. Progesterone-enhanced sperm hyperactivation through IP3-PKC and PKA signals. Reprod Med Biol 2012; 12: 27–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sakamoto C, Fujinoki M, Kitazawa M, Obayashi S. Serotonergic signals enhanced hamster sperm hyperactivation. J Reprod Dev 2021; 67: 241–250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Alasmari W, Barratt CLR, Publicover SJ, Whalley KM, Foster E, Kay V, Martins da Silva S, Oxenham SK. The clinical significance of calcium-signalling pathways mediating human sperm hyperactivation. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 866–876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sugiyama Y, Fujinoki M, Shibahara H. Effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine on spermatozoal hyperactivation and in vitro fertilization in mice. J Reprod Dev 2019; 65: 541–550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Maleszewski M, Kline D, Yanagimachi R. Activation of hamster zona-free oocytes by homologous and heterologous spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1995; 105: 99–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mortimer ST. A critical review of the physiological importance and analysis of sperm movement in mammals. Hum Reprod Update 1997; 3: 403–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fujinoki M. Suppression of progesterone-enhanced hyperactivation in hamster spermatozoa by estrogen. Reproduction 2010; 140: 453–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Baldi E, Luconi M, Bonaccorsi L, Maggi M, Francavilla S, Gabriele A, Properzi G, Forti G. Nongenomic progesterone receptor on human spermatozoa: biochemical aspects and clinical implications. Steroids 1999; 64: 143–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gadkar S, Shah CA, Sachdeva G, Samant U, Puri CP. Progesterone receptor as an indicator of sperm function. Biol Reprod 2002; 67: 1327–1336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jang S, Yi LSH. Identification of a 71 kDa protein as a putative non-genomic membrane progesterone receptor in boar spermatozoa. J Endocrinol 2005; 184: 417–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fujinoki M. Serotonin-enhanced hyperactivation of hamster sperm. Reproduction 2011; 142: 255–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pérez-Cerezales S, López-Cardona AP, Gutiérrez-Adán A. Progesterone effects on mouse sperm kinetics in conditions of viscosity. Reproduction 2016; 151: 501–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fujinoki M. Regulation and disruption of hamster sperm hyperactivation by progesterone, 17β-estradiol and diethylstilbestrol. Reprod Med Biol 2014; 13: 143–152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fujinoki M, Takei GL. Estrogen suppresses melatonin-enhanced hyperactivation of hamster spermatozoa. J Reprod Dev 2015; 61: 287–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Calogero AE, Hall J, Fishel S, Green S, Hunter A, D’Agata R. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid on human sperm motility and hyperactivation. Mol Hum Reprod 1996; 2: 733–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kon H, Takei GL, Fujinoki M, Shinoda M. Suppression of progesterone-enhanced hyperactivation in hamster spermatozoa by γ-aminobutyric acid. J Reprod Dev 2014; 60: 202–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fujinoki M, Takei GL. γ-Aminobutyric acid suppresses enhancement of hamster sperm hyperactivation by 5-hydroxytryptamine. J Reprod Dev 2017; 63: 67–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Libersky EA, Boatman DE. Progesterone concentrations in serum, follicular fluid, and oviductal fluid of the golden hamster during the periovulatory period. Biol Reprod 1995; 53: 477–482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mortimer ST. CASA--practical aspects. J Androl 2000; 21: 515–524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Miyashita M, Fujinoki M. Effects of aging and oviductal hormones on testes, epididymides, and sperm of hamster. Reprod Med Biol 2022; 21: e12474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





