Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2023 May 8;11(3):e00770-23. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00770-23

Genomic Diversity of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 Isolates Collected from Diseased Swine in the German National Resistance Monitoring Program GERM-Vet from 2007 to 2019

Henrike Krüger-Haker a,b,#, Xing Ji c,#, Dennis Hanke a,b, Stefan Fiedler d, Andrea T Feßler a,b, Nansong Jiang e, Heike Kaspar d, Yang Wang e, Congming Wu e, Stefan Schwarz a,b,e,
Editor: Katharina Schauflerf
PMCID: PMC10269607  PMID: 37154741

ABSTRACT

Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) clonal complex 398 (CC398) isolates (n = 178) collected in the national resistance monitoring program GERM-Vet from diseased swine in Germany from 2007 to 2019 were investigated for their genomic diversity with a focus on virulence and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) traits. Whole-genome sequencing was followed by molecular typing and sequence analysis. A minimum spanning tree based on core-genome multilocus sequence typing was constructed, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed. Most isolates were assigned to nine clusters. They displayed close phylogenetic relationships but a wide molecular variety, including 13 spa types and 19 known and four novel dru types. Several toxin-encoding genes, including eta, seb, sek, sep, and seq, were detected. The isolates harbored a wide range of AMR properties mirroring the proportions of the classes of antimicrobial agents applied in veterinary medicine in Germany. Multiple novel or rare AMR genes were identified, including the phenicol-lincosamide-oxazolidinone-pleuromutilin-streptogramin A resistance gene cfr, the lincosamide-pleuromutilin-streptogramin A resistance gene vga(C), and the novel macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance gene erm(54). Many AMR genes were part of small transposons or plasmids. Clonal and geographical correlations of molecular characteristics and resistance and virulence genes were more frequently observed than temporal relations. In conclusion, this study provides insight into population dynamics of the main epidemic porcine LA-MRSA lineage in Germany over a 13-year-period. The observed comprehensive AMR and virulence properties, most likely resulting from the exchange of genetic material between bacteria, highlighted the importance of LA-MRSA surveillance to prevent further dissemination among swine husbandry facilities and entry into the human community.

IMPORTANCE The LA-MRSA-CC398 lineage is known for its low host specificity and frequent multiresistance to antimicrobial agents. Colonized swine and their related surroundings represent a considerable risk of LA-MRSA-CC398 colonization or infection for occupationally exposed people through which such isolates might be further disseminated within the human community. This study provides insight into the diversity of the porcine LA-MRSA-CC398 lineage in Germany. Clonal and geographical correlations of molecular characteristics and resistance and virulence traits were detected and may be associated with the spread of specific isolates through livestock trade, human occupational exposure, or dust emission. The demonstrated genetic variability underlines the lineage’s ability to horizontally acquire foreign genetic material. Thus, LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates have the potential to become even more dangerous for various host species, including humans, due to increased virulence and/or limited therapeutic options for infection control. Full-scale LA-MRSA monitoring at the farm, community, and hospital level is therefore essential.

KEYWORDS: LA-MRSA, evolution, antimicrobial resistance monitoring, whole-genome sequencing, cgMLST, antimicrobial susceptibility testing

INTRODUCTION

Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) has gained increasing attention as an important zoonotic pathogen since it was detected in Dutch swine in 2005 (1, 2). Clonal complex (CC) 398 is the major LA-MRSA lineage found in Europe, North and South America, and Australia (35). It has also been identified occasionally in Africa and Asia (68). CC398 comprises at least 43 sequence types (STs) (9), but among LA-MRSA, mainly ST398 isolates are described. Swine represent a major reservoir for LA-MRSA-CC398 (9). Such isolates are only occasionally reported as causes of diseases, such as pyoderma, pneumonia, or septicemia in swine, and mainly play a role as colonizers of the skin and the mucosal surfaces (3). However, LA-MRSA-CC398 has no particular host specificity. Thus, it can easily cross species barriers and colonize or infect other animals, such as cattle, sheep, goats, poultry, dogs, cats, horses, rabbits, rats, and mink, as well as humans (1, 1016). In humans, LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates have mainly been reported from skin and soft tissue infections in the community and from nosocomial wound infections, pneumonia, and even septicemia when introduced into the hospital setting (1, 17). Persons in direct (occupational) contact with livestock are at particular risk of LA-MRSA-CC398 colonization or infection, and further human-to-human transmission cannot be excluded (1). It is important to note that the multiresistance to several classes of antimicrobial agents is typical for the LA-MRSA-CC398 lineage (9). Previous studies have shown that these isolates differ in their spa types, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, and resistance and virulence gene patterns, highlighting the lineage’s diversity (3, 4, 1820).

In this study, LA-MRSA-CC398 collected from diseased swine all over Germany during 13 years on the basis of one isolate per herd were comparatively investigated for their genomic diversity, with an emphasis on virulence and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) properties. Phylogenetic relationships, temporal and/or geographical accumulations of virulence, and AMR gene patterns, as well as the occurrence of mobile genetic elements (MGEs), such as small transposons or plasmids, were explored to understand the population dynamics within the main epidemic LA-MRSA lineage in Germany over time.

RESULTS

Molecular typing of 178 LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates revealed the presence of four STs, 13 spa types, 23 dru types, and two staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec element (SCCmec) types.

All STs detected were included in CC398, with the majority of isolates belonging to ST398 (n = 175; arcC_3, aroE_35, glpF_19, gmk_2, pta_20, tpi_26, yqiL_39). Three novel STs were submitted to the database, each differing in one allele from ST398 (ST6759, n = 1, glpF_45; ST7001, n = 1, glpF_884; ST7002, n = 1, tpi_779).

All spa and dru types identified are displayed in Table 1. The most common spa types were t011 (n = 120) and t034 (n = 38). Most spa types were closely related to each other, and t011 probably represented the original type from which the others have developed. In particular, single or multiple repeats were lost (t1451, t1456, t3423), and certain repeats were duplicated (t034, t2011, t2370) or exchanged (t1197). In other cases, most likely, an additional repeat was inserted (t2576), and repeats were deleted as well as duplicated (t1250) or lost and exchanged (t899, t2510, t6228). The most frequent dru types detected were dt11a (n = 117), dt6j (n = 13), and dt11af (n = 11). Four new dru types (dt8au, dt10ds, dt10dt, dt11dx) were submitted to the database. All dru types were closely related to one another, and dt11a most likely can be considered as the founder from which the others developed. Mostly, single or multiple repeats were exchanged (dt11ab, dt11af, dt11ag, dt11ap, dt11ax, dt11c, dt11ca, dt11cv, dt11dx, dt11v) or lost (dt3c, dt5e, dt6j, dt9v, dt10ao). However, repeats also seemed to have been deleted as well as exchanged (dt8ap, dt8au, dt10an, dt10dt, dt10q) or maybe even deleted, duplicated, and exchanged (dt10al, dt10ds).

TABLE 1.

The spa and dru types observed among the 178 LA-MRSA-CC398 investigated in this study

spa type Repeat order No. of isolates dru type Repeat order No. of isolates
t011 08-16-02-25-34-24-25 120 dt3c 5a-2d-3e 1
t034 08-16-02-25-02-25-34-24-25 38 dt5e 5a-2d-4a-0-3e 5
t899 07-16-23-02-34 1 dt6j 5a-2d-4a-0-2d-3e 13
t1197 08-16-02-25-46-24-25 2 dt8ap 5a-2d-4a-0-2d-5b-2a-2f 1
t1250 08-16-02-25-02-25 1 dt8aua 5a-2d-4a-0-2d-5b-2a-3e 1
t1451 08-16-02-25-34-25 3 dt9v 5a-2d-4a-0-2d-2g-3b-4e-3e 1
t1456 08-16-02-25 1 dt10al 5a-2d-2d-2d-5b-3a-2g-4b-4e-3e 6
t2011 08-16-16-02-25-34-24-25 1 dt10an 4k-4a-0-2d-5b-3a-2g-3b-4e-3e 3
t2370 08-16-16-02-25-02-25-34-24-25 1 dt10ao 5a-4a-0-2d-5b-3a-2g-3b-4e-3e 1
t2510 08-17-25 7 dt10dsa 5a-2d-2d-2d-5b-3a-2g-3c-4e-3e 1
t2576 08-12-16-02-25-34-24-25 1 dt10dta 5a-2d-4a-0-2d-6f-3a-2g-3b-4e 1
t3423 08-16-02-25-34-24 1 dt10q 5a-2d-4a-0-2d-5b-3a-2g-2c-4e 1
t6228 35-25-34-24-25 1 dt11a 5a-2d-4a-0-2d-5b-3a-2g-3b-4e-3e 117
dt11ab 5a-2d-4a-0-2d-5b-3a-2g-3b-4e-2f 3
dt11af 5a-2d-4a-0-2d-5b-2a-2g-3b-4e-3e 11
dt11ag 5a-3c-4a-0-2d-5b-2a-2g-3b-4e-3e 2
dt11ap 5a-2d-4a-0-2d-5b-3a-3o-3b-4e-3e 1
dt11ax 5a-2d-4a-0-2d-6f-3a-2g-3b-4e-3e 2
dt11c 5a-2d-4a-0-2d-5b-3a-2g-4b-4e-3e 3
dt11ca 5a-3c-4a-0-2d-5b-3a-2g-3b-4e-3e 1
dt11cv 5a-2d-4a-1b-2d-6f-3a-2g-3b-4e-3e 1
dt11dxa 5a-2d-4a-2d-2d-5b-2a-2g-3b-4e-3e 1
dt11v 5a-2d-4a-0-3c-5b-3a-2g-3b-4e-3e 1
a

Novel dru types identified within this study and submitted to the dru typing database.

In 174 isolates, SCCmec type Vc(5C2&5) cassettes were detected. One isolate was not subtypeable [SCCmec type V(5C2&5)], and another harbored an SCCmec type IVa(2B) element. Two isolates carried a truncated SCCmec cassette.

The LA-MRSA-CC398 carried a uniform set of virulence genes typically associated with S. aureus.

All individual virulence gene profiles are given in Data set S1 in the supplemental material. Most importantly, the Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) genes lukF-PV and lukS-PV and the toxic shock syndrome (TSS) toxin 1 gene tst were not identified. Moreover, none of the isolates carried the genes sak, chp, and scn, which are indicative of β-hemolysin-converting phages. All isolates also lacked the exfoliative toxin genes etb and etd. In contrast, they harbored eta and the exotoxin genes set1, set4, and set5 as well as several hemolysin genes. The staphylococcal enterotoxin type P gene sep was also detected in all LA-MRSA isolates. However, the enterotoxin type B gene seb was additionally detected in only four isolates and another four isolates were additionally positive for enterotoxin type K and Q genes sek and seq. Furthermore, the isolates were negative for the protease genes splA, splB, and splE, but sspA (n = 176) and sspB (n = 178) were detected almost uniformly among all isolates. The protease-associated genes hysAVSaβ, paiB, and cfim were also identified in all LA-MRSA. Minor differences were detected regarding genes coding for microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) such as clfA (n = 177), clfB (n = 171), cna (n = 154), ebh (n = 173), efb (n = 178), fnbA (n = 171), fnbB (n = 176), sdrC (n = 169), sdrD (n = 174), and sdrE (n = 176). All isolates carried a chromosomal icaRADBC operon for biofilm formation. Moreover, 34 isolates harbored an additional ica-like gene cluster, most likely on a plasmid. Seven types were identified with the majority of LA-MRSA (n = 20) harboring an ica-like operon that was described before on plasmid pAFS11 from a bovine MRSA-ST398 isolate (21). Plasmid pHKS3860 was identified in isolate 4 and harbored a singular type of ica-like gene cluster (22). Finally, the von Willebrand factor-binding protein gene vwb was identified (n = 177), and all isolates shared capsule type 5.

Numerous AMR genes were detected, many of which were carried by small transposons or plasmids.

The AMR genes that were found are listed in Table 2 (23), and individual AMR gene profiles are shown in Data set S1. The LA-MRSA carried 3 to 15 different AMR genes, and 158 isolates showed multiresistance (24). All isolates harbored at least one β-lactam resistance gene (mecA) and one tetracycline resistance gene. A single isolate had two blaZ copies. In several isolates, combinations of genes conferring resistance to members of the same class (Table 2) or to different classes of antimicrobial agents were found. Interestingly, seven isolates harbored the genes lnu(B) plus lsa(E) plus aadD plus aadE plus spw in combination. The combination of lnu(B) plus lsa(E) also occurred in another two isolates. In all apmA-carrying isolates, aadD was also detected. Another isolate was positive for both fexA and cfr. Besides AMR genes, fluoroquinolone resistance-mediating point mutations in gyrA and grlA were detected, which resulted in the amino acid exchanges S84L/S80F (n = 8) and S84L/S80Y (n = 13), respectively.

TABLE 2.

Antimicrobial resistance genes harbored by the 178 LA-MRSA-CC398 included in the study

Resistance to: Gene No. of isolates Gene combinations No. of isolates
β-Lactams blaZ 172a blaZ + mecA 172
mecA 178
Tetracyclines tet(K) 172 tet(K) + tet(M) 131
tet(L) 43 tet(L) + tet(M) 3
tet(M) 177 tet(K) + tet(L) + tet(M) 40
tet(38) 178b
Macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramin B erm(A) 23 erm(A) + erm(B) 5
erm(B) 39 erm(A) + erm(C) 4
erm(C) 48 erm(A) + erm(54) 1
erm(T) 10 erm(B) + erm(C) 2
erm(54) 1 erm(C) + erm(T) 3
erm(A) + erm(B) + erm(C) 1
Lincosamides lnu(A) 3
lnu(B) 9
Lincosamides, pleuromutilins, streptogramin A vga(A)V 25
vga(A)LC 2
vga(C) 1
vga(E) 21
lsa(E) 9
Aminoglycosides aacA-aphD (gentamicin, kanamycin, tobramycin, amikacin) 15 aacA-aphD + str 1
aacA-aphD + aadD + str 9
aadD (kanamycin, neomycin, tobramycin) 42 aadD + aadE 5
aadD + str 20
aadE (streptomycin) 7 aadD + aadE + str 2
str (streptomycin) 82
Aminocyclitols spc (spectinomycin) 24 spc + apmA 1
spcV (spectinomycin) 2 spc + spw + apmA 1
spd (spectinomycin) 2
spw (spectinomycin) 7
apmA (apramycin, decreased gentamicin susceptibility) 20
Trimethoprim dfrG 47
dfrK 47
Phenicols fexA 16
Phenicols, lincosamides, oxazolidinones, pleuromutilins, streptogramin A cfr 1
a

One isolate harbored two blaZ copies.

b

The tet(38) gene can be found in nearly every S. aureus genome, including phenotypically susceptible isolates, and may confer resistance to tetracycline only when overexpressed (23).

Figure 1a shows that several AMR genes were part of small transposons or the multiresistance spw cluster, which is most likely of enterococcal origin (2537). Overall, all lnu(B), vga(A)V, lsa(E), aadE, spcV, spw, fexA, and cfr genes identified here were found to be part of such an MGE. Only a fragmented Tn916 was detected in two tet(M)-carrying isolates. One vga(E)-carrying isolate harbored a variant of Tn6133, which lacked erm(A) and three further open reading frames. Tn4001 is only 4.5 kb in size and comprises an aacA-aphD gene flanked by two IS256 insertion sequence elements. Thus, the complete Tn4001 could not be identified based on Illumina short-read sequences. Nevertheless, aacA-aphD was intact in all 15 isolates carrying this gene. However, the presence of the complete Tn4001 in one isolate with a closed genome also suggested its presence in the remaining 14 isolates. Besides a complete fexA-carrying transposon, Tn558, detected in 15 isolates, a truncated ΔTn558 in which the transposase genes ΔtnpA and ΔtnpB were partly deleted and replaced by the genes istAS, istBS, and cfr, was identified in a single isolate.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

(a and b) Schematic comparison of (a) small transposons and the spw-cluster (2537) and (b) small plasmids carried by the porcine LA-MRSA-CC398 from Germany. The number of isolates that harbored each mobile genetic element (MGE) is given below its designation. In cases where direct matches were found with plasmids from the database, the accession number is given in parentheses after the plasmid designation. The open reading frames are shown as arrows with the arrowhead indicating the direction of transcription. The transposase/conjugative transfer genes, recombination genes, plasmid recombination/mobilization genes, and replication genes are shown in green, yellow, turquoise, and purple, respectively. The antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, biocide resistance genes, transcriptional regulation genes, and genes encoding other functions are displayed in red, orange, dark blue, and gray, respectively. Truncated genes are indicated by a triangle, and size scales are given in the bottom-right corners.

Several AMR genes were detected on small plasmids of 2,360 to 5,713 bp in size, including all vga(A)LC, str, and spd genes as well as almost all erm(C) and lnu(A) genes of the LA-MRSA collection. In one and two isolate(s), the genetic environment of lnu(A) and erm(C), respectively, was fragmented. The dfrK gene was also identified on a small plasmid of 5,594 bp in one isolate. In addition, dfrK was found on a 9,585-bp plasmid with tet(L) in one isolate and on a 14,362-bp plasmid in combination with aadD, vga(C), and tet(L) in another isolate. A 36,929-bp plasmid harboring erm(54) next to an ica locus, the cadmium resistance genes cadD and cadX, the mercury resistance genes merR and merA, and the copper resistance genes copB and mco was described in one isolate (22). Moreover, six isolates harbored a small plasmid of 2,216 to 2,295 bp that carried a biocide resistance gene, either qacC (n = 1) or qacG (n = 5), both mediating elevated MICs to quaternary ammonium compounds such as benzalkonium chloride. In accordance with a previous study that described qacC-harboring S. aureus isolates from primates, which showed a slightly elevated MIC of 0.0004% for benzalkonium chloride (38), these isolates exhibited MIC values of 0.0005 to 0.001% for this biocide. Representative plasmid maps are shown in Fig. 1b.

The genotypic AMR profiles correlated almost completely with the phenotypic ones.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results are displayed in Table 3. A total of 67 phenotypic AMR profiles were observed (Data set S1). For one erm(A)-positive isolate, inducible macrolide/lincosamide resistance was detected. MIC values of linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin were not available for all LA-MRSA, but in one isolate they confirmed expression of the cfr gene. Despite the presence of an AMR gene in the genome, the associated phenotype was not detected in one fexA-carrying, three lnu(A)-carrying, and eight vga(A)V-carrying isolates. Changes in neither the nucleotide sequences of the respective resistance genes nor the associated promoter regions were found. In addition, four of 13 isolates harboring the S84L/S80Y exchanges in GyrA and GrlA showed MIC values lower than those considered resistant (Table 3). No resistance-mediating genes or point mutations were identified in two isolates exhibiting resistance to erythromycin and gentamicin, respectively.

TABLE 3.

Distribution of MIC values for the 178 LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates identified in this study

Antimicrobial agent(s) No. of isolates with MIC (mg/L) of:
Isolates that are:
Susceptible
Intermediate
Resistanta
0.008 0.015 0.03 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 n % n % n %
Oxacillin X - - - - - - - - 13 71 94 X X X X X - - 178 100
Penicillinb X - - - - - - 1 - 4 21 83 43 26 X X X - - 178 100
Ampicillinb X X - - - - - 1 - 13 48 75 24 14 3 X X - - 178 100
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acidb,c X X - - - - - 1 21 100 46 9 1 - X X X - - 178 100
Ceftiofurb X X - - - - - - 2 86 62 21 4 2 1 X X - - 178 100
Cefquinomeb X - - - - - - 7 90 59 21 1 - X X X X - - 178 100
Cefotaximeb X - - - - - - - - 2 92 62 19 3 X X X - - 178 100
Cefoperazoneb X X X - - - - - - - 91 66 17 4 X X X - - 178 100
Erythromycin X - - - - 23 47 1 1 1 - 1 - 104 X X X 70 39 3 2 105 59
Tylosin tartrate X X X - - - - 58 26 1 1 1 - - - 91 X
Tilmicosin X X X - - - 1 70 5 4 3 1 - - - 94 X
Clindamycin X X - 3 47 16 4 - - - 11 4 1 - 92 X X 70 39 - - 108 61
Pirlimycin X X - - - 12 44 12 1 - 1 8 8 - 92 X X
Enrofloxacin - - 3 84 48 6 14 6 14 3 - X X X X X 161 90 - - 17 10
Gentamicin X X X X - 51 75 14 1 11 10 - 5 8 3 - X 152 85 10 6 16 9
Tetracycline X X X X - - - - - - - - 1 10 167 - X - - - - 178 100
Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprimc X - 2 65 17 16 39 22 9 8 - - - X X X X 170 96 8 4
Vancomycin X - - - - - 94 82 2 - - - - X X X X 178 100 - - - -
a

Isolates were classified as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant if breakpoints were available in the CLSI document VET01S or M100 (97, 98). Despite the lack of breakpoints, isolates that showed high MIC values of enrofloxacin (≥4 mg/L) were considered resistant (3).

b

Since oxacillin-resistant staphylococci are resistant to all currently available β-lactams, except for ceftaroline, resistance to these agents can be deduced from the oxacillin MIC values (97, 98).

c

MIC values of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (2:1) and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (19:1) are given as amoxicillin and trimethoprim MIC values, respectively. Concentrations not included in the test panel are marked with an X or italic text. Isolates displayed in the lowest not-tested concentration showed growth in the highest test concentration, and the MIC is equal to or greater than the concentration following the highest test concentration. Black vertical lines indicate, if available, the CLSI breakpoints used to classify the isolates as susceptible, intermediate (if available), or resistant.

The LA-MRSA-CC398 displayed close phylogenetic relationships.

The minimum spanning tree based on core-genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) revealed 177 allelic profiles comprising 9 clusters and 9 singletons (Fig. 2). Isolates 45 and 46 shared a profile. The profiles varied in 0 to 156 target genes of 1,569 alleles included (Data set S2, Fig. 2), and isolates were assigned to clusters with a maximum threshold of 29 allelic differences. Cluster 1 represented the main cluster comprising 119 isolates and started to emerge in 2007. Clusters 2 and 3 also developed starting in 2007 and finally consisted of seven and two isolates, respectively. Clusters 4, 5, and 6, including 5, 2, and 17 isolates, respectively, began to arise in 2008. Cluster 7 comprised 13 isolates and was first identified in 2009. Most recently, clusters 8 and 9 started to emerge in 2018, and both included two isolates. The relation between phylogenetic clustering and spatial distribution of the LA-MRSA-CC398 is demonstrated in Fig. 3 and Table 4.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Minimum spanning tree displaying the phylogenetic relationship of the 178 LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates from Germany based on core-genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) analysis with SeqSphere+, including 1,569 alleles. The circles represent different allelic profiles, and the count of varying target genes between them is shown next to the connecting lines. The nine clusters are illustrated in different colors: cluster 1 in blue-gray, cluster 2 in dark green, cluster 3 in turquoise, cluster 4 in dark blue, cluster 5 in light blue, cluster 6 in yellow, cluster 7 in light green, cluster 8 in red, and cluster 9 in orange. The two isolates carrying a truncated SCCmec cassette are framed by a box. The three isolates not belonging to sequence type (ST) 398 are marked by a rhombus (ST6759), square (ST7001), or cross (ST7002).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Swine density in Germany for the year 2020 and approximate locations of the farms from which the LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates originated based on zip code regions. The swine density is given as the number of swine per 100 ha of agricultural land according to the German federal and state statistical offices (https://agraratlas.statistikportal.de/#). A color legend is given in the top-left corner, and a distance scale is displayed in the bottom-right corner. The isolate IDs are given within the circles or rectangles, which contain more than one number in cases where multiple isolates were found within the same zip code area. The various colors of the circles and rectangles refer to the differentiation of isolate clusters shown by the minimum spanning tree in Fig. 2: cluster 1 in blue-gray, cluster 2 in dark green, cluster 3 in turquoise, cluster 4 in dark blue, cluster 5 in light blue, cluster 6 in yellow, cluster 7 in light green, cluster 8 in red, and cluster 9 in orange.

TABLE 4.

Isolates identified by federal state and year, including the affiliation to a cluster

Federal statea (no. of isolates/state in total) Yrb Isolate ID(s) Isolates within the same zip code regions Cluster(s)
Baden Wuerttemberg (2) 2009 79 1
2016 138 1
Bavaria (63) 2008 15, 16, 17, 25, 26, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 45, 46, 55, 58 1
2009 61, 68, 69, 74, 75, 77, 78 75 and 78 1, 7
2010 87, 88, 91, 95, 102, 105, 106, 116 1, 6
2012 119, 120, 121 1
2013 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133 1, 6, 7
2015 136 1
2016 139, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 148, 149, 150, 152, 153, 156, 158 152 and 158 1, 6, 7
2018 168, 170, 171, 173, 174 168 and 173 1, 8, 9
2019 176, 177 1, 6
Brandenburg (5) 2008 47 1
2018 166, 172 7, 8
2019 175, 178 1, 7
Hesse (10) 2007 3, 4 1, singleton
2010 86, 90, 97, 100, 101, 103, 112, 115 1, 4, 6
Lower Saxony (3) 2008 14, 56 1, 4
2016 147 7
Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (18) 2007 9, 10, 11, 12, 19 9 and 19; 11 and 12 1, 3
2008 27, 28, 41 1
2009 62, 81 1, 4
2010 93, 99, 107, 108, 110, 113 93 and 113; 99 and 107 1
2011 117, 118 1, 6
North Rhine-Westphalia (41) 2007 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8 1, 2
2008 13, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 29, 31, 37, 42, 43, 44, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 57 21 and 42; 23, 24, and 29 1, 2, 5, 6, singleton
2009 59, 64, 65, 66, 67, 76 1, 6
2010 85, 94, 96, 104, 111, 114 1, 2, 7, singletons
2016 146, 155 1, 2
Rhineland-Palatinate (3) 2008 30 1
2009 73 1
2010 109 1
Saxony (8) 2008 34 4
2010 84 1
2013 134 5
2016 140, 154, 159 6, 7
2018 167, 169 6, 7
Saxony-Anhalt (6) 2009 60, 71, 72 1, 4
2010 92, 98 1, singleton
2015 137 1
Schleswig-Holstein (8) 2009 63, 70, 80 1, 6
2010 82, 83 1
2012 122 Singleton
2013 123 1
2014 135 1
Thuringia (11) 2008 32, 33 Singletons
2010 89 6
2016 151, 157 1, 6
2017 160, 161, 162 160 and 161 1, 6, 7
2018 163, 164, 165 1, 7, singleton
a

No isolates were detected in the federal states Berlin, Bremen, Hamburg, and Saarland.

b

Numbers of isolates detected per year in total: 2007, n = 13; 2008, n = 45; 2009, n = 23; 2010, n = 35; 2011, n = 2; 2012, n = 4; 2013, n = 12; 2014, n = 1; 2015, n = 2; 2016, n = 22; 2017, n = 3; 2018, n = 12; 2019, n = 4.

Isolates within a cluster shared specific characteristics, and three clusters showed geographical correlations.

The 119 isolates associated with the largest cluster, cluster 1, were found all over Germany during the whole study period. Remarkably, 114 of them displayed the dominant spa type, t011. Three isolates had spa type t1451, and one isolate each spa type t2011 or t2576, all present exclusively in cluster 1. The second most common spa type, t034 (n = 38), was not found within cluster 1, but was found in clusters 3 to 8 and among the singletons. Several AMR genes were exclusively observed within cluster 1, including erm(T), vga(A)LC on a plasmid, aacA-aphD, apmA, spd on a plasmid, and cfr as part of ΔTn558 (see Table 2). Moreover, most of the tet(L)-, erm(B)-, erm(C)-, and dfrK-carrying isolates (36/43, 27/39, 31/48 [on plasmid], and 38/47, respectively) were found within cluster 1, while only four out of 23 erm(A)-harboring and five out of 47 dfrG-harboring isolates were detected here. Almost all fexA-carrying isolates (13/16) were also associated with this cluster, with 12 isolates harboring Tn558 and one harboring ΔTn558. Moreover, the qacC-positive isolate and three of five qacG-carrying LA-MRSA were part of cluster 1.

The seven cluster 2 isolates originated exclusively from North-Rhine Westphalia, near the Dutch border, with two isolates from the same zip code area. The spa (t2510) and dru (dt10al, dt10ds) types detected were unique within the LA-MRSA collection. The vga(A)V gene as part of Tn5406 was detected in all seven isolates. They showed a multiresistance profile harboring five to 10 AMR genes. Six of them carried erm(B), aadD, tet(K), and tet(L) as well as tet(M) on Tn916, which was, however, in one isolate only available fragmented. Five isolates harbored a dfrK gene. Moreover, three of four isolates positive for the enterotoxin genes sek and seq were associated with cluster 2.

Two isolates assigned to cluster 3 were collected in 2007 within the same zip code region in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania. They were multiresistant and had an identical AMR gene profile, including blaZ, mecA, tet(K), tet(M) as part of Tn916, erm(C) on a plasmid, and dfrG.

All five cluster 4 isolates were collected relatively far apart from each other from 2008 to 2010 in central and northern Germany. They harbored AMR genes conferring resistance to three to five classes of antimicrobial agents and, thus, were classified as multiresistant. Three isolates harbored vga(A)V as part of Tn5406, and all isolates were positive for dfrG.

Although the two cluster 5 isolates originated from very different locations (North-Rhine Westphalia/Saxony) and years (2008/2013), they carried the same AMR genes (blaZ, mecA, tet(K), Tn916 with tet(M), str on a plasmid, dfrG).

A wide distribution over Germany was also seen for the 17 cluster 6 isolates collected during almost the complete study period. Interestingly, all five isolates with dru type dt5e and 12 of 13 isolates with dru type dt6j were observed within this cluster. With eight to 11 AMR genes, the isolates harbored a particularly large number of resistance genes. The multiresistance profiles were almost identical [blaZ, mecA, tet(K), Tn916 with tet(M)—fragmented in one isolate, erm(A), erm(B), erm(C), vga(E), str on a plasmid, spc, dfrG; individual losses of erm(B) and/or erm(C) and/or str]. In these isolates, 17 of 23 erm(A) genes were detected as part of Tn6133 with vga(E) and spc, alone or in combination with either erm(B) found on Tn917 (6/6 isolates) or erm(C) on a plasmid. Considering vga(E) and spc, 17 out of 21 and 24 positive isolates, respectively, were identified within this cluster.

Cluster 7 comprised 13 isolates identified at greater distances to each other mainly in central and southern Germany. Interestingly, 10 of 11 dru type dt11af isolates were part of this cluster. Seven isolates carried erm(C) on a plasmid, and three isolates carried fexA as part of Tn558. The same six isolates harbored, next to aadD, the spw-cluster that also comprised lnu(B), lsa(E), and aadE. This combination was otherwise only identified in a single cluster 1 isolate. Moreover, all cluster 7 isolates were positive for dfrG and the same kind of variations in GyrA and GrlA (S84L/S80Y), which were not detected in other isolates.

The two cluster 8 isolates from 2018 differed not only in their origin (Brandenburg/Bavaria), but also in their AMR gene profiles. However, both isolates exhibited a multiresistance profile, including dfrG and Tn560 comprising lnu(B), lsa(E), and spcV. The spcV gene was not found in other isolates.

The two cluster 9 isolates from 2018 originated from the same zip code region in Bavaria. They carried only the AMR genes blaZ, mecA, tet(K), and, as part of Tn916, tet(M) and were resistant only to β-lactams and tetracyclines.

Eight of the remaining nine singletons were isolated in central Germany, while one isolate came from northern Schleswig-Holstein. The only isolate of the collection harboring vga(C) [on a plasmid with aadD, dfrK, and tet(L)] and erm(54) (on another plasmid with heavy metal resistance genes) was found among these singletons. Considering trimethoprim resistance, dfrG and dfrK were detected here. Three of eight isolates positive for one or two enterotoxin gene(s) in addition to sep also belonged to the singletons.

Locations of the farms from which the LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates originated largely reflected the pork production density in Germany, and further geographical correlations were revealed.

Most of the 178 isolates were collected in southern Germany (Bavaria, n = 63) and western Germany near the Dutch border (North-Rhine Westphalia, n = 41) (Fig. 3, Table 4).

The spa type t1197 was detected in two isolates found relatively close to each other (32 and 92, Fig. 3). Moreover, two of three spa type t1451 isolates were collected close to each other in Bavaria (16 and 17, Fig. 3). All seven spa type t2510 isolates were identified exclusively in North-Rhine Westphalia grouped within cluster 2 as mentioned above. Six of these isolates displayed dru type dt10al, which was not observed more often. Two of three dru type dt11ab isolates originated from relatively close locations on the border between Baden-Württemberg and Bavaria (79 and 116, Fig. 3).

One isolate carrying the enterotoxin gene seb and all four isolates positive for the enterotoxin genes sek and seq were detected in proximity to each other in North-Rhine Westphalia (155/29, 31, 57, and 104, Fig. 3).

The most frequently detected AMR genes within our collection were spread throughout Germany. However, isolates harboring specific genes still aggregated partly in particular regions. Furthermore, some genes were found in nearby isolates but also in single LA-MRSA isolates from more distant areas. AMR genes that occurred less frequently were often found in isolates of more distant geographical origin. Interestingly, aacA-aphD was mainly identified in isolates from Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (9, 10, 19, 27, 28, 108) and Bavaria (58, 74, 61, 116, 124, 171) (Fig. 3). Four and two isolates, respectively, from Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania even originated from the same zip code region. Out of 20 apmA- and aadD-positive isolates, five (63, 80, 83, 123, 135; Fig. 3) originated from Schleswig-Holstein, and six of these 20 isolates (44, 52, 54, 59, 76, 94; Fig. 3) originated from North-Rhine Westphalia. Only two isolates (40 and 58) harbored spd on a plasmid, but both were identified relatively nearby in Bavaria (Fig. 3). Out of 16 isolates carrying fexA on Tn558, 11 aggregated in two locations in Bavaria (74, 75, 127, 45, 46, 141, 144, 145, 152, 158, 174; Fig. 3). In addition, several isolates that were collected in nearby locations showed identical resistance profiles. Out of five isolates carrying the biocide resistance gene qacG on a plasmid, two isolates each were found in Thuringia (151 and 164) and Brandenburg (166 and 178) (Fig. 3).

Temporal correlations of typing results, virulence, and resistance properties were observed less often.

The total number of isolates per year varied from one (2014) to 45 (2008) (Table 4). From 2007 to 2019, most of the isolates investigated were obtained by 2010 (n = 116). In years with higher isolate numbers, a distribution all over Germany or at least over certain regions was observed (Table 4). Some isolates were even identified in the same zip code region in the same year. They also belonged to the same respective clusters, except for some isolates in North-Rhine Westphalia (23, 24, 29) and Thuringia (160, 161) (Table 4, Fig. 3).

Certain spa (t1197, t1451) and dru (dt10al, dt11ag, dt11ax, dt11c) types occurred only during the early years of our study period until 2010.

One isolate from 2007 and 22 isolates from 2008 were negative for the collagen adhesion-encoding gene cna. Considering later years, this was recognized only in 2018 for two LA-MRSA isolates. Furthermore, six of the eight isolates harboring either seb or sek and seq were from 2008 (seb, n = 1; sek/seq, n = 3) or 2010 (seb, n = 1; sek/seq, n = 1) and, thus, were identified only in the early years of our study period.

The presence of specific AMR determinants was overall not limited to certain years. Exceptions were the genes vga(A)LC on a plasmid (2008 to 2009), spcV as part of Tn560 together with lnu(B) and lsa(E) (2018), and spd on a plasmid (2008). However, in each case only two LA-MRSA isolates carrying the respective gene(s) were found. Isolates harboring a dfr gene were detected during the whole study period. Until 2015, mainly dfrK was identified. However, since 2016 the dominant variant apparently changed so that more dfrG-positive than dfrK-positive LA-MRSA isolates were found. In 2018 and 2019, dfrK was not detected. The isolates carrying qacG on a plasmid from nearby locations in Thuringia and Brandenburg were collected in later years of the study period (2016 to 2019).

DISCUSSION

Conventional systems still dominate among swine farms in Germany (https://www.giscloud.nrw.de/arcgis/apps/storymaps/stories/5e62a2b3316a45e18a356d7d6a6afeae). They have shown high percentages of LA-MRSA-positive samples, with CC398 dominating by far, while LA-MRSA was reported to be nearly absent in the more rarely occurring organic farms (20, 39). More precisely, LA-MRSA-CC398 has been reported to colonize the animals asymptomatically in almost half of German swine farms (20, 40) and up to 86% of humans occupationally exposed to them (17, 40). Fortunately, extended human-to-human transmission happened rarely, and nasal LA-MRSA carriage was found in only 0.08 to 0.2% of humans at hospital admission in Germany as a whole (17). Nonetheless, numbers are notably higher in areas of high livestock density (17, 41). In this study, LA-MRSA-CC398 was also recognized to be widespread all over Germany, largely reflecting the pork production density (https://agraratlas.statistikportal.de/#). However, isolate submission to the national resistance monitoring program GERM-Vet occurs on a voluntary basis and includes only isolates from diseased animals; hence, the program does not necessarily reflect the true prevalence of monitored pathogens.

The cgMLST analysis revealed close relationships between the LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates, as their allelic profiles varied in only 0 to 9.9% of 1,569 alleles included. The assignment of isolates to a cluster was based on a previous study stating that S. aureus isolates displaying ≥30 allelic variations should be considered unrelated (42). Next to the main cluster (cluster 1) comprising most of the LA-MRSA, new side clusters and singletons emerged over time, which points toward an ongoing diversification within the porcine LA-MRSA-CC398 lineage resulting in novel variants. Our discovery of new STs and dru types underlines this assumption. All spa types detected were related and typically associated with LA-MRSA-CC398 (20, 4345). The dru types identified were also related, and many have already been known to occur in LA-MRSA-CC398 (dt3c, dt5e, dt6j, dt10q, dt11a, dt11ab, dt11af, dt11ap, dt11c, dt11v) (4649). However, dru type dt9v was previously described only in MRSA-CC5 (48, 49) and the types dt10ao, dt11ax, and dt11ca only in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (5052). In accordance with previous literature (53), exclusively SCCmec type IV and V elements were found in the LA-MRSA-CC398 besides two truncated cassettes. The multitude of spa and dru types identified emphasizes the molecular diversity within CC398 that has already been reported and is still increasing (9, 20).

LA-MRSA-CC398 typically lacked major virulence-associated factors often found in community- or hospital-associated MRSA, such as TSS toxin or PVL (17, 54). Nevertheless, they harbored genes encoding hemolysins, exotoxins, enterotoxins, and an exfoliative toxin. Exfoliative toxin-producing S. aureus strains can induce greasy pig disease along with the usual causative agent Staphylococcus hyicus (55). This is of clinical relevance for LA-MRSA-positive swine farms, and one isolate of our collection originated from an animal with this medical history. The exfoliative toxin gene eta was also detected in an MRSA-ST398 from a hospitalized Chinese child (56). Interestingly, eta and enterotoxin genes were previously described as less frequent in LA-MRSA-CC398 (54, 57). All LA-MRSA carried the protease-associated genes hysAVSaβ, paiB, and cfim, whose prevalence in S. aureus was suggested to result in enhanced proteolytic activity (58). Consequently, these genes may be part of virulence-associated genomic traits that might account for the success of epidemic clones (58). However, so far, only the enhanced pathogenicity of LA-MRSA-CC398 due to hysAVSaβ has been functionally confirmed (59).

LA-MRSA-CC398 typically exhibited a wide range of AMR to different classes of antimicrobial agents. In agreement with the literature (57), part of the isolates showed only resistance to β-lactams and tetracyclines (n = 20), while more comprehensive phenotypes were also recognized. The AMR profiles mirrored the amounts of antimicrobial agents dispensed in veterinary medicine in Germany (https://www.bvl.bund.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/05_tierarzneimittel/2022/2022_PM_Abgabemengen_Antibiotika_Tiermedizin.html). Penicillins and tetracyclines account for the largest shares, followed by sulfonamides, polypeptides, and macrolides. These classes of antimicrobial agents are also commonly used on German swine farms (60, 61).

Next to AMR genes commonly found among staphylococci of animals (29, 57, 62), the novel erm(54) gene (22) and several other resistance genes were found in ≤10 isolates, including erm(T), lnu(A), lnu(B), vga(A)LC, vga(C), lsa(E), aadE, spcV, spd, spw, and cfr. Since cfr confers transferable resistance also to oxazolidinones, which are last-resort antimicrobial agents in human medicine, there is particular interest in the dissemination of this gene (63). As is known for LA-MRSA (62), several AMR genes mediating the same resistance phenotype were detected here, and many isolates harbored two or three AMR genes accounting for the same resistance property (Table 2). This might be due to an acquisition at different times and/or their location on MGEs carrying additional AMR genes (62). In fact, a large proportion of AMR genes was found to be part of small transposons or plasmids and, as such, might be transferred easily by horizontal gene transfer across strain, species, or genus boundaries. In addition to persistence of AMR genes in bacterial populations directly linked to the usage of certain antimicrobial agents, coselection processes due to more than one AMR gene or additional biocide and heavy metal resistance genes located on the same MGE need to be taken into account (62). MGEs harboring more than one AMR gene were also identified here. The characterization of SCCmec cassettes and possible, larger (multiresistance) plasmids among the 178 LA-MRSA isolates should be the subject of a follow-up study, because these elements could not be characterized completely here, as data from hybrid genome assembly were only available for a limited number of isolates.

Several characteristics of the LA-MRSA-CC398 were related to their phylogenetic affiliation to a cluster and/or their geographical origin. For example, many spa or dru types and AMR or biocide resistance genes were identified to a large extent or exclusively in isolates within the same cluster. The isolates within a cluster also often displayed similar or even identical AMR gene combinations. The main cluster 1, comprising most of the isolates, showed the greatest variety in molecular characteristics and AMR properties. Regional accumulations were most likely to be seen in clusters 2, 3, and 9. However, the latter two only comprised two isolates each. Isolates originating from the same zip code areas mainly belonged to the same cluster and/or were often identified in the same year. Certain spa and dru types were associated with specific areas in Germany. A spatial connection was also revealed for the detection of the biocide resistance gene qacG on a plasmid as well as the enterotoxin genes seb, sek, and seq. Regarding sek and seq, an association with cluster 2 was observed. Frequently detected AMR genes were spread all over Germany, but aggregation was also recognized in individual regions. More rarely occurring genes were observed in isolates from distant regions, although accumulation in individual areas was sometimes also revealed. In addition, similar or even identical AMR gene profiles were recognized in isolates originating from nearby regions. Temporal correlations of certain characteristics were recognized less often. Some spa or dru types were only seen in isolates identified during the early years. Isolates negative for cna or harboring one or two additional enterotoxin gene(s) besides sep tended to occur at the beginning of the study period. Next to a cluster-associated distribution, the AMR genes dfrG and dfrK most likely showed a time-dependent dissemination. The presence during limited periods was observed only for AMR or biocide resistance genes detected in small numbers. Finally, the exchange of genetic material between bacteria and their clonal dissemination enhanced by livestock trading activities, human occupational exposure, or emission of dust might be reasons for the isolates’ close phylogenetic relationships and the clonal and geographical correlations of characteristics outweighing temporal relations.

Studies of porcine LA-MRSA-CC398 have also been performed in other European countries (18, 6469). The available information suggests that the AMR and virulence properties of those isolates are comparable to the characteristics of the LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates from Germany investigated in the present study.

Germany has established instruments providing antibiotic consumption data from human and veterinary medicine; however, region-specific data are needed (70) to evaluate the influence of possibly preferred agents on the distribution of individual resistance properties in specific areas and/or at certain times. Moreover, regarding all observed correlations here, it is worth noting that samples were not collected evenly over time and across the federal states in the GERM-Vet program. Especially in the early years, the northern German federal states were overrepresented, and for Lower Saxony—the state with the highest swine density—too few isolates were included to get a coherent picture for all of Germany. Considering the lineage’s high diversification and transmission ratios and the intensity of livestock trade (9), a large-scale monitoring of LA-MRSA is needed so that intervention is possible in case novel, possibly more virulent and/or resistant variants are emerging. The prevalence of LA-MRSA will most likely not decrease (9), and the latest data available, covering part of our study period, even indicated an increase in the proportion of LA-MRSA in the German MRSA population, with up to 20% in “swine-dense” regions (71). If decolonization programs are targeted, a combination of measures concerning different husbandry factors needs to be considered (39).

In summary, this study uncovered diversity and population dynamics of the epidemic porcine LA-MRSA lineage in Germany over a 13-year-period. Clonal and geographical correlations of molecular characteristics, virulence, and resistance properties were identified. Full-scale LA-MRSA monitoring is needed to detect new emerging, possibly more dangerous clones and to prevent LA-MRSA transmission between livestock farms and introduction into human community or health care settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial isolates.

In total, 178 MRSA-CC398 isolates from diseased swine were investigated in this study. The isolates originated from local diagnostic facilities in Germany and were included in the national resistance monitoring program GERM-Vet during the years 2007 to 2019 on the basis of one isolate per swine herd. According to the background information from the diagnostic laboratories, 92 of the 178 isolates were presumably causative of the respective diseases (skin infections [n = 53], gastritis/enteritis [n = 9], musculoskeletal system infections [n = 7], septicemia [n = 6], central nervous system infections [n = 5], urinary-genital tract infections [n = 4], abscess/mammary lump [n = 2], staphylococcal infection [n = 2], abortion [n = 1], enterotoxemia [n = 1], greasy pig disease [n = 1], and polyserositis [n = 1]). One animal suffered from skin as well as central nervous system infection. Another 57 isolates were obtained from swine with respiratory tract infections and most likely represented colonizers of the respiratory mucosa, which were coisolated with other respiratory tract pathogens, such as Pasteurella multocida. For 25 isolates no background data were available except that the isolates originated from deceased animals. Finally, three isolates were probably only incidental findings and not causative agents of the respective diseases (streptococcal sepsis [n = 1], vitamin E and selenium deficiency [n = 1], and volvulus [n = 1]).

Short-read and long-read sequencing.

All 178 LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates were subjected to short-read sequencing. Genomic DNA of 152 isolates was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with adaptions for staphylococci as described previously (72). The libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, followed by 2 × 300-bp paired-end sequencing in 40-fold multiplexes on the MiSeq platform with the MiSeq reagent kit v3 (Illumina, Inc.). Genomic DNA of the remaining 26 isolates was extracted using the HiPure Bacterial DNA Kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China). Here, the libraries were prepared with the KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (Kapa Biosystems, Boston, MA, USA). Sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq X-Ten system (Annoroad Genomics Co., Beijing, China) and 2 × 150-bp paired-end reads with a minimum of 250-fold coverage were obtained for each isolate.

In addition, 12 LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates showing interesting characteristics were selected for long-read sequencing in order to generate complete, closed genomes. These isolates either held central positions within the different clusters of the cgMLST minimum spanning tree and/or harbored uncommon AMR genes/SCCmec cassettes and/or showed a—with the short-read sequences alone—not clearly identifiable SCCmec type. High-molecular-weight DNA was extracted with QIAGEN Genomic Tips 100G (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and sheared using g-TUBES (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA) to an average of 10 to 15 kb. Libraries were prepared using the SMRTbell Express Template Prep Kit 2.0 (Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, “Preparing Multiplexed Microbial Libraries” (v07). Barcoded adapters were prepared with the Barcoded Overhang Adapter Kits 8A and 8B (Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.). Equimolar pooling was calculated with the PacBio Express Microbial Multiplexing Calculator, followed by size selection with the BluePippin system (Biozym Scientific GmbH, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany) using the high-pass option at 7 kb. Primer annealing and polymerase binding were done with sequencing primer V4 according to the SMRT Link Sample Setup (Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.). Circular consensus sequencing reads were then generated by diffusion loading with 85 pM and an estimated insert size of 12 kb using one single-molecule real-time (SMRT) Cell (SMRT Cell 8M Tray, Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.) and a Sequel II Sequencing Kit v2.0 (Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.) on a Sequel II platform (2-h preextension, 30-h movie time; Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.).

Sequence assembly and annotation.

The 152 short-read sequences generated on the Illumina MiSeq platform were quality checked using FastQC v0.11.9 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) and trimmed with Trim Galore v0.6.5 (RRID:SCR_011847). De novo assembly into contigs was carried out with Unicycler v0.4.9 (73). The 26 short-read sequences obtained from the Illumina HiSeq X-Ten system were assembled with SPAdes v3.12.0 (74) after quality control processing via FastQC v0.11.5 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) and trimming with Trimmomatic v0.39 (75). In order to generate complete genomes of the 12 isolates subjected to long-read sequencing, the PacBio-HiFi long reads and Illumina short reads were hybrid assembled with Unicycler v0.4.9 (73) and the Flye algorithm in MaSuRCA v3.4.2 (76). In addition, a third assembly was performed with Canu v2.2 (77) using the PacBio-HiFi long reads. The generated genomes from MaSuRCA and Canu were polished using Pilon v1.2.3 (78) using the Illumina short reads. Subsequently, for all three generated genomes a consensus sequence was generated with Trycycler v0.5.3 (79). All assembled sequences were checked for errors with Geneious v11.1.4 (Biomatters, Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) and annotated with Prokka v1.14.5 (80) as well as a subsystem technology server (RAST) (81) for further investigation.

Molecular typing and phylogenetic analysis.

For all 178 LA-MRSA-CC398 whole-genome sequences, MLST, spa typing, and SCCmec typing were carried out using the MLST v2.0 (82), spaTyper v1.0 (83), and SCCmecFinder v1.2 (https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/SCCmecFinder/) online analysis tools from the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE). The dru types were identified according to the drutyping.org database (84) using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) function in Geneious v11.1.4 (Biomatters, Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand). Similar to spa typing, dru typing is a single-locus sequence-based typing method that, however, targets a region between the mecA gene and the adjacent IS431 element in SCCmec cassettes of methicillin-resistant staphylococci. This region consists of mostly 40-bp direct repeat units (dru) which differ slightly in their sequences. The number and order of the different dru repeats define the dru type. As of 3 April 2023, 103 dru repeats and 579 dru types, comprising 1 to 23 repeats, had been assigned.

The 178 LA-MRSA-CC398 genomes were also subjected to phylogenetic analysis in Ridom SeqSphere+ v7.5.5 (85) using the S. aureus cgMLST approach (86). A minimum spanning tree was built based on a distance matrix of the core genome allelic profiles in order to illustrate the clonal relationships between the isolates. Overall, 1,569 of 1,861 potential target genes were included in the analysis by removing 292 columns with missing values from the comparison table. Isolates were assigned to clusters with a maximum threshold of 29 allelic differences (42).

Investigation of virulence and AMR properties and MGEs.

In the 178 LA-MRSA-CC398 genomes, common virulence genes were identified with ABRicate v1.0.1 (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) using the VFDB database (87) and with CGE VirulenceFinder v2.0.3 (88). Known AMR genes were located with ABRicate v1.0.1 using the NCBI AMRFinder tool (89) and the CGE ResFinder (90) databases. In individual cases of fragmented genes, the presence of AMR determinants was confirmed by PCR. Chromosomal point mutations conferring AMR were detected by applying PointFinder (91) as part of the CGE ResFinder v4.1 tool (90). The CGE PlasmidFinder v2.0.1 tool (92, 93) and MobileElementFinder v1.0.3 (94) were used to determine MGEs. All results were checked for errors with Geneious v11.1.4 (Biomatters, Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand), BLAST (95), and the UniProt knowledgebase (96).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST).

AST by broth microdilution was performed in the GERM-Vet program according to the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for 29 antimicrobial agents using commercially available microtiter plates (Sensititre, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) (97, 98). Due to plate layout changes over the years, MICs for all 178 LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates are available for 18 antimicrobial compounds, including beta-lactams (oxacillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 2:1, ampicillin, penicillin, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, ceftiofur, and cefquinome), tetracycline, macrolides (erythromycin, tilmicosin, and tulathromycin), lincosamides (clindamycin and pirlimycin), an aminoglycoside (gentamicin), a fluoroquinolone (enrofloxacin), folate pathway inhibitors (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 1:19), and a glycopeptide (vancomycin). Isolates were classified as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant if breakpoints were available in the CLSI documents VET01S or M100 (97, 98) or in accordance with a previous study (3) (Table 3). Since several antimicrobial compounds were not included in the commercial microtiter plate layouts, the functionality of certain detected AMR genes was verified testing the growth of the corresponding isolates on Mueller-Hinton agar plates containing the respective antimicrobial agents at a specific threshold concentration. Despite the lack of CLSI-approved breakpoints, the functionality of the associated AMR gene was considered confirmed, in accordance with the sequencing data, for isolates that showed growth on plates with high concentrations of the antimicrobial agent (tiamulin, 2 to 8 mg/L [48]; kanamycin, 16 to 32 mg/L (99); streptomycin, 16 mg/L; spectinomycin, 128 to 256 mg/L [3]; apramycin, 16 mg/L [21]; trimethoprim, 8 mg/L [98]; florfenicol, 8 to 16 mg/L [99]). If available, CLSI-approved breakpoints or MIC values from previous studies were considered for the determination of threshold concentrations. In certain cases, up to two dilution steps lower than the information from the literature had to be tested. Moreover, screening for inducible macrolide/lincosamide resistance by agar disc diffusion (D-zone test) was conducted according to CLSI standards using discs containing erythromycin (15 μg; BBL Sensi-Disc, BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and clindamycin (2 μg; Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Biocide susceptibility testing (BST).

BST for benzalkonium chloride was carried out by broth microdilution using commercial microtiter plates (Sifin Diagnostics GmbH, Berlin, Germany), which contained benzalkonium chloride in 12 2-fold dilution steps (0.000008 to 0.016%). BST performance followed a published protocol (100) that was modified as described previously (101).

Data availability.

The whole-genome shotgun project comprising the genome sequences of 174 of the LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates included in this study has been deposited in GenBank under accession number PRJNA814867. The genome sequences of the remaining four LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates can be found within a previous project under accession number PRJNA842861. Isolate IDs and individual accession numbers are given in Data set S1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the German Research Foundation (grant number SCHW382/11-1) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81991535, 31761133022, and 81861138051). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

We thank Richard Goering for updates on the dru typing database.

We have no conflict of interest to declare.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 1
Data Set S1. Download spectrum.00770-23-s0001.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.1 MB (122.1KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 2
Data Set S2. Download spectrum.00770-23-s0002.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.1 MB (150.6KB, xlsx)

Contributor Information

Stefan Schwarz, Email: stefan.schwarz@fu-berlin.de.

Katharina Schaufler, Universität Greifswald.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Graveland H, Duim B, van Duijkeren E, Heederik D, Wagenaar JA. 2011. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals and humans. Int J Med Microbiol 301:630–634. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Voss A, Loeffen F, Bakker J, Klaassen C, Wulf M. 2005. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming. Emerg Infect Dis 11:1965–1966. doi: 10.3201/eid1112.050428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kadlec K, Ehricht R, Monecke S, Steinacker U, Kaspar H, Mankertz J, Schwarz S. 2009. Diversity of antimicrobial resistance pheno- and genotypes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from diseased swine. J Antimicrob Chemother 64:1156–1164. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Monecke S, Coombs G, Shore AC, Coleman DC, Akpaka P, Borg M, Chow H, Ip M, Jatzwauk L, Jonas D, Kadlec K, Kearns A, Laurent F, O'Brien FG, Pearson J, Ruppelt A, Schwarz S, Scicluna E, Slickers P, Tan HL, Weber S, Ehricht R. 2011. A field guide to pandemic, epidemic and sporadic clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 6:e17936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Price LB, Stegger M, Hasman H, Aziz M, Larsen J, Andersen PS, Pearson T, Waters AE, Foster JT, Schupp J, Gillece J, Driebe E, Liu CM, Springer B, Zdovc I, Battisti A, Franco A, Zmudzki J, Schwarz S, Butaye P, Jouy E, Pomba C, Porrero MC, Ruimy R, Smith TC, Robinson DA, Weese JS, Arriola CS, Yu F, Laurent F, Keim P, Skov R, Aarestrup FM. 2012. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. mBio 3:e00305-11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00305-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chuang Y-Y, Huang Y-C. 2015. Livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Asia: an emerging issue? Int J Antimicrob Agents 45:334–340. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abdulgader SM, Shittu AO, Nicol MP, Kaba M. 2015. Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Africa: a systematic review. Front Microbiol 6:348. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chairat S, Gharsa H, Lozano C, Gómez-Sanz E, Gómez P, Zarazaga M, Boudabous A, Torres C, Ben Slama K. 2015. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from raw meat samples in Tunisia: detection of clonal lineage ST398 from the African continent. Foodborne Pathog Dis 12:686–692. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2015.1958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Butaye P, Argudín MA, Smith TC. 2016. Livestock-associated MRSA and its current evolution. Curr Clin Micro Rep 3:19–31. doi: 10.1007/s40588-016-0031-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Silva V, Araújo S, Monteiro A, Eira J, Pereira JE, Maltez L, Igrejas G, Lemsaddek TS, Poeta P. 2023. Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA in livestock: antimicrobial resistance and genetic lineages. Microorganisms 11:124. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11010124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Feßler AT, Olde Riekerink RGM, Rothkamp A, Kadlec K, Sampimon OC, Lam TJGM, Schwarz S. 2012. Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 obtained from humans and animals on dairy farms. Vet Microbiol 160:77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nienhoff U, Kadlec K, Chaberny IF, Verspohl J, Gerlach GF, Schwarz S, Simon D, Nolte I. 2009. Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains between humans and dogs: two case reports. J Antimicrob Chemother 64:660–662. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Weiss S, Kadlec K, Feßler AT, Schwarz S. 2013. Identification and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus pettenkoferi from a small animal clinic. Vet Microbiol 167:680–685. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vincze S, Stamm I, Kopp PA, Hermes J, Adlhoch C, Semmler T, Wieler LH, Lübke-Becker A, Walther B. 2014. Alarming proportions of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in wound samples from companion animals, Germany 2010–2012. PLoS One 9:e85656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Desvars-Larrive A, Ruppitsch W, Lepuschitz S, Szostak MP, Spergser J, Feßler AT, Schwarz S, Monecke S, Ehricht R, Walzer C, Loncaric I. 2019. Urban brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) as possible source of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp., Vienna, Austria, 2016 and 2017. Euro Surveill 24:1900149. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.32.1900149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hansen JE, Stegger M, Pedersen K, Sieber RN, Larsen J, Larsen G, Lilje B, Chriél M, Andersen PS, Larsen AR. 2020. Spread of LA-MRSA CC398 in Danish mink (Neovison vison) and mink farm workers. Vet Microbiol 245:108705. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cuny C, Köck R, Witte W. 2013. Livestock associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) and its relevance for humans in Germany. Int J Med Microbiol 303:331–337. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Peeters LEJ, Argudín MA, Azadikhah S, Butaye P. 2015. Antimicrobial resistance and population structure of Staphylococcus aureus recovered from pigs farms. Vet Microbiol 180:151–156. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stegger M, Lindsay JA, Sørum M, Gould KA, Skov R. 2010. Genetic diversity in CC398 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates of different geographical origin. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:1017–1019. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.European Food Safety Authority. 2009. Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in holdings with breeding pigs, in the EU, 2008, Part A: MRSA prevalence estimates; on request from the European Commission. EFSA J 7:1376. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1376. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Feßler AT, Kadlec K, Schwarz S. 2011. Novel apramycin resistance gene apmA in bovine and porcine methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:373–375. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01124-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Krüger H, Ji X, Hanke D, Schink AK, Fiedler S, Kaspar H, Wang Y, Schwarz S, Wu C, Feßler AT. 2022. Novel macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance gene erm(54) in MRSA ST398 from Germany. J Antimicrob Chemother 77:2296–2298. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Truong-Bolduc QC, Dunman PM, Strahilevitz J, Projan SJ, Hooper DC. 2005. MgrA is a multiple regulator of two new efflux pumps in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 187:2395–2405. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.7.2395-2405.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sweeney MT, Lubbers BV, Schwarz S, Watts JL. 2018. Applying definitions for multidrug resistance, extensive drug resistance and pandrug resistance to clinically significant livestock and companion animal bacterial pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:1460–1463. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bastos MC, Murphy E. 1988. Transposon Tn554 encodes three products required for transposition. EMBO J 7:2935–2941. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03152.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kehrenberg C, Schwarz S. 2005. Florfenicol-chloramphenicol exporter gene fexA is part of the novel transposon Tn558. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:813–815. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.2.813-815.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kehrenberg C, Schwarz S. 2006. Distribution of florfenicol resistance genes fexA and cfr among chloramphenicol-resistant Staphylococcus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:1156–1163. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.4.1156-1163.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kadlec K, Schwarz S. 2010. Identification of the novel dfrK-carrying transposon Tn559 in a porcine methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ST398 strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:3475–3477. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00464-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ji X, Krüger H, Wang Y, Feßler AT, Wang Y, Schwarz S, Wu C. 2022. Tn560, a novel Tn554 family transposon from porcine methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398, carries a multiresistance gene cluster comprising a novel spc gene variant and the genes lsa(E) and lnu(B). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 66:e0194721. doi: 10.1128/aac.01947-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Roberts AP, Mullany P. 2009. A modular master on the move: the Tn916 family of mobile genetic elements. Trends Microbiol 17:251–258. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bean EL, McLellan LK, Grossman AD. 2022. Activation of the integrative and conjugative element Tn916 causes growth arrest and death of host bacteria. PLoS Genet 18:e1010467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shaw JH, Clewell DB. 1985. Complete nucleotide sequence of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B-resistance transposon Tn917 in Streptococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 164:782–796. doi: 10.1128/jb.164.2.782-796.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lyon BR, May JW, Skurray RA. 1984. Tn4001: a gentamicin and kanamycin resistance transposon in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Gen Genet 193:554–556. doi: 10.1007/BF00382099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Haroche J, Allignet J, El Solh N. 2002. Tn5406, a new staphylococcal transposon conferring resistance to streptogramin A and related compounds including dalfopristin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:2337–2343. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2337-2343.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schwendener S, Perreten V. 2011. New transposon Tn6133 in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 contains vga(E), a novel streptogramin A, pleuromutilin, and lincosamide resistance gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4900–4904. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00528-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wendlandt S, Li B, Lozano C, Ma Z, Torres C, Schwarz S. 2013. Identification of the novel spectinomycin resistance gene spw in methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus of human and animal origin. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:1679–1680. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lozano C, Aspiroz C, Sáenz Y, Ruiz-García M, Royo-García G, Gómez-Sanz E, Ruiz-Larrea F, Zarazaga M, Torres C. 2012. Genetic environment and location of the lnu(A) and lnu(B) genes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other staphylococci of animal and human origin. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2804–2808. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Roberts MC, Feßler AT, Monecke S, Ehricht R, No D, Schwarz S. 2018. Molecular analysis of two different MRSA clones ST188 and ST3268 from primates (Macaca spp.) in a United States primate center. Front Microbiol 9:2199. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kobusch I, Schröter I, Linnemann S, Schollenbruch H, Hofmann F, Boelhauve M. 2022. Prevalence of LA-MRSA in pigsties: analysis of factors influencing the (De)colonization process. Sci Rep 12:18000. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21903-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cuny C, Wieler LH, Witte W. 2015. Livestock-associated MRSA: the impact on humans. Antibiotics (Basel) 4:521–543. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics4040521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.van Alen S, Ballhausen B, Peters G, Friedrich AW, Mellmann A, Köck R, Becker K. 2017. In the centre of an epidemic: fifteen years of LA-MRSA CC398 at the University Hospital Münster. Vet Microbiol 200:19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cunningham SA, Chia N, Jeraldo PR, Quest DJ, Johnson JA, Boxrud DJ, Taylor AJ, Chen J, Jenkins GD, Drucker TM, Nelson H, Patel R. 2017. Comparison of whole-genome sequencing methods for analysis of three methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreaks. J Clin Microbiol 55:1946–1953. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00029-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Köck R, Schaumburg F, Mellmann A, Köksal M, Jurke A, Becker K, Friedrich AW. 2013. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as causes of human infection and colonization in Germany. PLoS One 8:e55040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Verhegghe M, Pletinckx LJ, Crombé F, Vandersmissen T, Haesebrouck F, Butaye P, Heyndrickx M, Rasschaert G. 2013. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST398 in pig farms and multispecies farms. Zoonoses Public Health 60:366–374. doi: 10.1111/zph.12007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nemeghaire S, Argudín MA, Haesebrouck F, Butaye P. 2014. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage isolates from bovines. BMC Vet Res 10:153. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wendlandt S, Kadlec K, Feßler AT, Monecke S, Ehricht R, van de Giessen AW, Hengeveld PD, Huijsdens X, Schwarz S, van Duijkeren E. 2013. Resistance phenotypes and genotypes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from broiler chickens at slaughter and abattoir workers. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:2458–2463. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Loncaric I, Lepuschitz S, Ruppitsch W, Trstan A, Andreadis T, Bouchlis N, Marbach H, Schauer B, Szostak MP, Feßler AT, Künzel F, Licka T, Springer B, Allerberger F, Monecke S, Ehricht R, Schwarz S, Spergser J. 2019. Increased genetic diversity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from companion animals. Vet Microbiol 235:118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Feßler AT, Kadlec K, Hassel M, Hauschild T, Eidam C, Ehricht R, Monecke S, Schwarz S. 2011. Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from food and food products of poultry origin in Germany. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:7151–7157. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00561-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Monecke S, Ruppelt A, Wendlandt S, Schwarz S, Slickers P, Ehricht R, Cortez de Jäckel S. 2013. Genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from diseased poultry. Vet Microbiol 162:806–812. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kadlec K, Schwarz S, Goering RV, Weese JS. 2015. Direct repeat unit (dru) typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from dogs and cats. J Clin Microbiol 53:3760–3765. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01850-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kadlec K, Weiß S, Wendlandt S, Schwarz S, Tonpitak W. 2016. Characterization of canine and feline methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) from Thailand. Vet Microbiol 194:93–97. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Saab ME, Weese JS, McClure JT. 2017. Direct repeat unit (dru) typing and antimicrobial resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from dogs in Atlantic Canada. Can J Vet Res 81:192–198. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Monecke S, Slickers P, Gawlik D, Müller E, Reissig A, Ruppelt-Lorz A, Cortez de Jäckel S, Feßler AT, Frank M, Hotzel H, Kadlec K, Jatzwauk L, Loncaric I, Schwarz S, Schlotter K, Thürmer A, Wendlandt S, Ehricht R. 2018. Variability of SCCmec elements in livestock-associated CC398 MRSA. Vet Microbiol 217:36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Becker K, Ballhausen B, Kahl BC, Köck R. 2017. The clinical impact of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of the clonal complex 398 for humans. Vet Microbiol 200:33–38. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Park J, Friendship RM, Poljak Z, Weese JS, Dewey CE. 2013. An investigation of exudative epidermitis (greasy pig disease) and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus hyicus and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical cases. Can Vet J 54:139–144. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wu D, Li X, Yang Y, Zheng Y, Wang C, Deng L, Liu L, Li C, Shang Y, Zhao C, Yu S, Shen X. 2011. Superantigen gene profiles and presence of exfoliative toxin genes in community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Chinese children. J Med Microbiol 60:35–45. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.023465-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wendlandt S, Schwarz S, Silley P. 2013. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a food-borne pathogen? Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 4:117–139. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-030212-182653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chen F, Yin Y, Chen H, Jin L, Li S, Wang R, Wang S, Wang Q, Sun S, Wang H. 2022. Phenotypic and genomic comparison of Staphylococcus aureus highlight virulence and host adaptation favoring the success of epidemic clones. mSystems 7:e00831-22. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00831-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ji X, Krüger H, Tao J, Wang Y, Feßler AT, Bai R, Wang S, Dong Y, Shen J, Wang Y, Schwarz S, Wu C. 2021. Comparative analysis of genomic characteristics, fitness and virulence of MRSA ST398 and ST9 isolated from China and Germany. Emerg Microbes Infect 10:1481–1494. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1951125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Merle R, Hajek P, Käsbohrer A, Hegger-Gravenhorst C, Mollenhauer Y, Robanus M, Ungemach F-R, Kreienbrock L. 2012. Monitoring of antibiotic consumption in livestock: a German feasibility study. Prev Vet Med 104:34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Seitz M, Valentin-Weigand P, Willenborg J. 2016. Use of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine as exemplified by the swine pathogen Streptococcus suis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 398:103–121. doi: 10.1007/82_2016_506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Schwarz S, Feßler AT, Loncaric I, Wu C, Kadlec K, Wang Y, Shen J. 2018. Antimicrobial resistance among staphylococci of animal origin. Microbiol Spectr 6:ARBA-0010-2017. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0010-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Schwarz S, Zhang W, Du XD, Krüger H, Feßler AT, Ma S, Zhu Y, Wu C, Shen J, Wang Y. 2021. Mobile oxazolidinone resistance genes in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 34:e0018820. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00188-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Verhegghe M, Crombé F, Luyckx K, Haesebrouck F, Butaye P, Herman L, Heyndrickx M, Rasschaert G. 2016. Prevalence and genetic diversity of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on Belgian pork. J Food Prot 79:82–89. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Karpíšková R, Koukalová K, Koláčková I. 2015. Prevalence and characteristics of MRSA strains isolated from pigs on farms, at slaughterhouses and in pork meat at retail sale in the Czech Republic. Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek 21:41–45. In Czech. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mroczkowska A, Żmudzki J, Marszałek N, Orczykowska-Kotyna M, Komorowska I, Nowak A, Grzesiak A, Czyżewska-Dors E, Dors A, Pejsak Z, Hryniewicz W, Wyszomirski T, Empel J. 2017. Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus on Polish pig farms. PLoS One 12:e0170745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Pirolo M, Gioffrè A, Visaggio D, Gherardi M, Pavia G, Samele P, Ciambrone L, Di Natale R, Spatari G, Casalinuovo F, Visca P. 2019. Prevalence, molecular epidemiology, and antimicrobial resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from swine in southern Italy. BMC Microbiol 19:51. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1422-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sharma M, Nunez-Garcia J, Kearns AM, Doumith M, Butaye PR, Argudín MA, Lahuerta-Marin A, Pichon B, AbuOun M, Rogers J, Ellis RJ, Teale C, Anjum MF. 2016. Livestock-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) clonal complex (CC) 398 isolated from UK animals belong to European lineages. Front Microbiol 7:1741. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sieber RN, Skov RL, Nielsen J, Schulz J, Price LB, Aarestrup FM, Larsen AR, Stegger M, Larsen J. 2018. Drivers and dynamics of methicillin-resistant livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus CC398 in pigs and humans in Denmark. mBio 9:e02142-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02142-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Noll I, Schweickert B, Tenhagen BA, Käsbohrer A. 2018. Antibiotic consumption and antimicrobial resistance in human and veterinary medicine: an overview of established national surveillance systems in Germany. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 61:522–532. doi: 10.1007/s00103-018-2724-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Schaumburg F, Köck R, Mellmann A, Richter L, Hasenberg F, Kriegeskorte A, Friedrich AW, Gatermann S, Peters G, von Eiff C, Becker K. study group. 2012. Population dynamics among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Germany during a 6-year period. J Clin Microbiol 50:3186–3192. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01174-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Scholtzek AD, Hanke D, Walther B, Eichhorn I, Stöckle SD, Klein K-S, Gehlen H, Lübke-Becker A, Schwarz S, Feßler AT. 2019. Molecular characterization of equine Staphylococcus aureus isolates exhibiting reduced oxacillin susceptibility. Toxins 11:535. doi: 10.3390/toxins11090535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich A, Korobeynikov A, Lapidus A, Prjibelsky A, Pyshkin A, Sirotkin A, Sirotkin Y, Stepanauskas R, McLean J, Lasken R, Clingenpeel SR, Woyke T, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2013. Assembling genomes and mini-metagenomes from highly chimeric reads, p 158–170. In Deng M, Jiang R, Sun F, Zhang X (ed), Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology, RECOMB 2013. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Nurk S, Walenz BP, Rhie A, Vollger MR, Logsdon GA, Grothe R, Miga KH, Eichler EE, Phillippy AM, Koren S. 2020. HiCanu: accurate assembly of segmental duplications, satellites, and allelic variants from high-fidelity long reads. Genome Res 30:1291–1305. doi: 10.1101/gr.263566.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wick RR, Judd LM, Cerdeira LT, Hawkey J, Méric G, Vezina B, Wyres KL, Holt KE. 2021. Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biol 22:266. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02483-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, Jelsbak L, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Ussery DW, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2012. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50:1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bartels MD, Petersen A, Worning P, Nielsen JB, Larner-Svensson H, Johansen HK, Andersen LP, Jarløv JO, Boye K, Larsen AR, Westh H. 2014. Comparing whole-genome sequencing with Sanger sequencing for spa typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 52:4305–4308. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01979-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Goering RV, Morrison D, Al-Doori Z, Edwards GFS, Gemmell CG. 2008. Usefulness of mec-associated direct repeat unit (dru) typing in the epidemiological analysis of highly clonal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Scotland. Clin Microbiol Infect 14:964–969. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02073.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jünemann S, Sedlazeck FJ, Prior K, Albersmeier A, John U, Kalinowski J, Mellmann A, Goesmann A, von Haeseler A, Stoye J, Harmsen D. 2013. Updating benchtop sequencing performance comparison. Nat Biotechnol 31:294–296. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Leopold SR, Goering RV, Witten A, Harmsen D, Mellmann A. 2014. Bacterial whole-genome sequencing revisited: portable, scalable, and standardized analysis for typing and detection of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes. J Clin Microbiol 52:2365–2370. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00262-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Liu B, Zheng D, Jin Q, Chen L, Yang J. 2019. VFDB 2019: a comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D687–D692. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Joensen KG, Scheutz F, Lund O, Hasman H, Kaas RS, Nielsen EM, Aarestrup FM. 2014. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 52:1501–1510. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03617-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Feldgarden M, Brover V, Haft DH, Prasad AB, Slotta DJ, Tolstoy I, Tyson GH, Zhao S, Hsu C-H, McDermott PF, Tadesse DA, Morales C, Simmons M, Tillman G, Wasilenko J, Folster JP, Klimke W. 2019. Validating the AMRFinder tool and resistance gene database by using antimicrobial resistance genotype-phenotype correlations in a collection of isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00483-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00483-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, Cattoir V, Philippon A, Allesoe RL, Rebelo AR, Florensa AF, Fagelhauer L, Chakraborty T, Neumann B, Werner G, Bender JK, Stingl K, Nguyen M, Coppens J, Xavier BB, Malhotra-Kumar S, Westh H, Pinholt M, Anjum MF, Duggett NA, Kempf I, Nykäsenoja S, Olkkola S, Wieczorek K, Amaro A, Clemente L, Mossong J, Losch S, Ragimbeau C, Lund O, Aarestrup FM. 2020. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zankari E, Allesøe R, Joensen KG, Cavaco LM, Lund O, Aarestrup FM. 2017. PointFinder: a novel web tool for WGS-based detection of antimicrobial resistance associated with chromosomal point mutations in bacterial pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2764–2768. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Møller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Johansson MHK, Bortolaia V, Tansirichaiya S, Aarestrup FM, Roberts AP, Petersen TN. 2021. Detection of mobile genetic elements associated with antibiotic resistance in Salmonella enterica using a newly developed web tool: MobileElementFinder. J Antimicrob Chemother 76:101–109. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.UniProt Consortium. 2021. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D480–D489. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2020. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals, 5th ed. CLSI Supplement VET01S. CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2022. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 32nd ed. CLSI Supplement M100. CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Feßler A, Scott C, Kadlec K, Ehricht R, Monecke S, Schwarz S. 2010. Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from cases of bovine mastitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:619–625. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Schug AR, Bartel A, Scholtzek AD, Meurer M, Brombach J, Hensel V, Fanning S, Schwarz S, Feßler AT. 2020. Biocide susceptibility testing of bacteria: development of a broth microdilution method. Vet Microbiol 248:108791. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Schug AR, Scholtzek AD, Turnidge J, Meurer M, Schwarz S, Feßler AT. the Biocide Susceptibility Study Group. 2022. Development of quality control ranges for biocide susceptibility testing. Pathogens 11:223. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11020223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1

Data Set S1. Download spectrum.00770-23-s0001.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.1 MB (122.1KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 2

Data Set S2. Download spectrum.00770-23-s0002.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.1 MB (150.6KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The whole-genome shotgun project comprising the genome sequences of 174 of the LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates included in this study has been deposited in GenBank under accession number PRJNA814867. The genome sequences of the remaining four LA-MRSA-CC398 isolates can be found within a previous project under accession number PRJNA842861. Isolate IDs and individual accession numbers are given in Data set S1.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES