Skip to main content
The Western Journal of Medicine logoLink to The Western Journal of Medicine
. 1989 Jul;151(1):93–96.

A peer review of a peer review organization.

S E Dippe, M M Bell, M A Wells, W Lyons, S Clester
PMCID: PMC1026986  PMID: 2669350

Abstract

Under Medicare, one of the federally required objectives of peer review organizations is to reduce inappropriate and unnecessary admissions. We reevaluated 32 admissions approved and 32 denied by the Arizona peer review organization, Health Services Advisory Group (HSAG), in a "blind" manner to determine whether practicing physicians in the community agree with the local peer review organization. Overall, physicians at the Scottsdale Memorial Hospital (SMH) approved 72% of HSAG-approved and denied 61% of HSAG-denied admissions. Of the 64 admissions, 3 or 4 of 4 reviewers (2 physicians and 2 nurses) agreed with the HSAG decision in 38 (59%), but 2 or more reviewers disagreed in the other 26 (41%). Disagreement between the 2 physicians occurred in 48% of the cases and disagreement between the 2 nurses in 33%. Even among admissions denied by SMH physician reviewers, the physicians would have admitted 23% of those patients under similar circumstances. In 28% of the HSAG-denied admissions, the reviewing physicians thought that the patients' health care would have been compromised if the admissions had not taken place. Despite well-defined criteria for the appropriateness of hospital admissions, the review process remains subjective, with much disagreement between peer review organizations and practicing physicians.

Full text

PDF
93

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akhter M. N. PRO review of hospital admissions of Medicare patients. Mo Med. 1985 Mar;82(3):123–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dans P. E., Weiner J. P., Otter S. E. Peer review organizations. Promises and potential pitfalls. N Engl J Med. 1985 Oct 31;313(18):1131–1137. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198510313131806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Grimaldi P. L., Micheletti J. A. PRO objectives and quality criteria. Hospitals. 1985 Feb 1;59(3):64–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mellette P. M. The changing focus of peer review under Medicare. Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon) 1986 Dec;8(10):7–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Western Journal of Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES