ABSTRACT
The plant essential oil component trans-cinnamaldehyde (t-CIN) exhibits antibacterial activity against a broad range of foodborne pathogenic bacteria, including L. monocytogenes, but its mode of action is not fully understood. In this study, several independent mutants of L. monocytogenes with increased t-CIN tolerance were obtained via experimental evolution. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis revealed single-nucleotide-variation mutations in the yhfK gene, encoding an oxidoreductase of the short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases superfamily, in each mutant. The deletion of yhfK conferred increased sensitivity to t-CIN and several other α,β-unsaturated aldehydes, including trans-2-hexenal, citral, and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. The t-CIN tolerance of the deletion mutant was restored via genetic complementation with yhfK. Based on a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of the culture supernatants, it is proposed that YhfK is an ene reductase that converts t-CIN to 3-phenylpropanal by reducing the C=C double bond of the α,β-unsaturated aldehyde moiety. YhfK homologs are widely distributed in Bacteria, and the deletion of the corresponding homolog in Bacillus subtilis also caused increased sensitivity to t-CIN and trans-2-hexenal, suggesting that this protein may have a conserved function to protect bacteria against toxic α,β-unsaturated aldehydes in their environments.
IMPORTANCE While bacterial resistance against clinically used antibiotics has been well studied, less is known about resistance against other antimicrobials, such as natural compounds that could replace traditional food preservatives. In this work, we report that the food pathogen Listeria monocytogenes can rapidly develop an elevated tolerance against t-cinnamaldehyde, a natural antimicrobial from cinnamon, by single base pair changes in the yhfK gene. The enzyme encoded by this gene is an oxidoreductase, but its substrates and precise role were hitherto unknown. We demonstrate that the enzyme reduces the double bond in t-cinnamaldehyde and thereby abolishes its antibacterial activity. Furthermore, the mutations linked to t-CIN tolerance increased bacterial sensitivity to a related compound, suggesting that they modify the substrate specificity of the enzyme. Since the family of oxidoreductases to which YhfK belongs is of great interest in the mediation of stereospecific reactions in biocatalysis, our work may also have unanticipated application potential in this field.
KEYWORDS: Listeria monocytogenes, natural antimicrobials, food preservatives, antimicrobial resistance, ene reductase, short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase, SDR
INTRODUCTION
Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive foodborne pathogen that causes severe, invasive listeriosis and meningitis among susceptible persons, such as immunocompromised individuals, pregnant women, and elderly persons (1, 2). The organism thrives well in a wide range of natural environments, including soil, freshwater, decaying plant material, and the gastrointestinal tracts of various animals. It also thrives as a member of the resident house microbiota of food production facilities. Therefore, it is therefore a common contaminant during food production and storage processes (2, 3). Furthermore, the ability of L. monocytogenes to grow under adverse conditions, such as high salt concentration (up to 10% NaCl) and low temperature (as low as 0°C) make this pathogen a major concern in refrigerated, ready-to-eat foods. Preservatives, such as nitrites, benzoates, and sorbates are commonly used to prevent its outgrowth to high numbers, but these compounds are increasingly under scrutiny for possible adverse health effects, and food producers are exploring more natural alternatives with which to replace them (4, 5).
Plant essential oil constituents have received much attention in this respect, and a well-studied example is trans-cinnamaldehyde (t-CIN) ([E]-3-phenyl-2-propenal), which is one of the major components of cinnamon essential oil (4, 6). Previous work in our laboratory showed that the growth inhibition by t-CIN against L. monocytogenes is typically characterized by a dose-dependent elongation of the lag phase and a reduction of the growth rate (7). Many different effects of t-CIN on bacterial cells have been reported, including an increased cell membrane permeability (8), the inhibition of membrane-associated ATPase activity (9), elevated intracellular redox stress (10, 11), the inhibition of cell division (12), the repression of quorum sensing systems (13, 14), and the disruption of cell wall homeostasis (15). However, these are quite broad general defects that are induced by many different types of antimicrobials and are therefore likely to be secondary effects that do not reflect the specific mode of action or the primary cellular targets of t-CIN (16). Besides t-CIN, other α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds of plant origin, such as trans-2-hexenal (t-HEX) and citral, exhibit broad antimicrobial activity that offers promise for applications (4, 17). The α,β-unsaturated carbonyl moiety shared by these compounds is electrophilic and accounts for reactivity with a wide range of nucleophilic nitrogen and sulfur atoms in biomolecules, including proteins, glutathione, and cysteine, primarily by the Michael-type addition reaction (18). Proteins containing active Cys residues (e.g., glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, thioredoxins, and glutaredoxins) have particularly been identified as intracellular targets of various electrophilic α, β-unsaturated carbonyls in human and animal cells, but the targets in bacteria have not been elucidated (19).
Apart from conjugation with cellular nucleophiles, α,β-unsaturated aldehydes can be detoxified via enzymatic transformation to less electrophilic molecules in at least some microbes. It has been demonstrated that t-CIN can be reduced to the less toxic 3-phenyl-2-propenol by Escherichia coli O157:H7 (20) and by the fungi Aspergillus ochraceus and Penicillium expansum (21, 22). A predicted NADPH-dependent aldehyde reductase, YqhD, was anticipated to catalyze this reaction in E. coli because the transcription of yqhD was significantly induced by t-CIN, and the inactivation of the gene significantly reduced the tolerance of E. coli to t-CIN (11, 20). Moreover, a broad range of short-chain aldehydes, including acrolein, isobutyraldehyde, glycolaldehyde, butanaldehyde, malondialdehyde, and propanaldehyde, were previously demonstrated to be reduced by purified YqhD from E. coli in vitro (23, 24). Besides, the Old Yellow Enzyme family of flavin-dependent NADPH dehydrogenases, which are widely distributed in bacteria and fungi, is comprised of several ene reductases that mediate the hydrogenation of the C=C double bond of a wide spectrum of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes in the presence of cofactors (25, 26). Examples include YqjM from B. subtilis (27), XenA from Pseudomonas putida, KYE1 from Kluyveromyces lactis, and Yers-ER from Yersinia bercovieri (28), all of which exhibit versatile substrate specificity toward α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds including t-CIN, as shown via in vitro enzymatic assays. However, so far, no enzymes that are able to transform α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds have been reported in L. monocytogenes.
In an attempt to generate novel insights into the antibacterial mechanisms of t-CIN or in the bacterial defense against the compound, L. monocytogenes Scott A was subjected to experimental evolution to develop increased tolerance to t-CIN, and the mutations that were responsible for this increased tolerance were identified in this work. This led to the identification of an ene reductase of the short-chain dehydrogenases/reductase (SDR) superfamily that reduces t-CIN and several other α,β-unsaturated aldehydes, thereby protecting L. monocytogenes against their toxic activity.
RESULTS
Evolution of L. monocytogenes for increased t-CIN tolerance selects for YhfK variant proteins.
After being subcultured for nine rounds in 3 mM t-CIN or for seven rounds in 4 mM t-CIN, mutants with significantly elevated t-CIN tolerance appeared in seven independent lineages (Fig. 1). This was not the case in the control lineages without t-CIN. Four evolved mutants were selected and further characterized. Their lag phase (λ) in BHI with 3 mM t-CIN was reduced to 62 to 72% of that of the wild-type (WT) strain, whereas their exponential growth rates (μmax) and maximal optical density (ODmax) values were unaffected, except for a slightly lower ODmax for mutant M3 (Fig. 1). All the mutants showed WT growth in the absence of t-CIN. Interestingly, a WGS analysis revealed that the mutants had each acquired a single base change in a different position in the coding region of the yhfK gene (NCBI locus CRH05_RS12830), resulting in four single amino acid variants of YhfK (Fig. 1). YhfK is predicted to be an oxidoreductase of the large, diverse SDR enzyme family.
FIG 1.
L. monocytogenes Scott A mutants with increased t-CIN resistance have mutations in yhfK that have resulted in single amino acid changes. (A) yhfK gene context and mutations in each of four selected mutants (M1, M2, M3, M4). Colored vertical lines show the positions of the mutations, with specific base changes (straight font type) and corresponding amino acid changes (italic) specified under each line. (B) Growth curves of the WT strain and t-CIN resistant mutants in BHI with (left) and without (right) 3 mM t-CIN. (C) Growth parameters (λ, μmax, and ODmax), represented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Values followed by a common letter are not significantly different at the 5% level.
Further evidence implicating YhfK in t-CIN tolerance was obtained when yhfK was deleted, as this resulted in an almost doubling of the lag phase (50 h for ΔyhfK versus 28 h for the WT strain) in the presence of 3 mM t-CIN, whereas no growth attenuation was noted in the absence of t-CIN (Fig. 2). The complementation of the ΔyhfK strain with the WT yhfK gene (strain ΔyhfK/pIMK2::yhfK) again reduced the lag phase, making it 3 h shorter than that of the WT, possibly because the gene was under the control of a strong constitutive promoter in pIMK2 (29). The complementation of ΔyhfK with each of the four mutant yhfK alleles reduced the lag times even further, by 7 to 8 h, relative to the WT. This was in line with their ability to confer t-CIN tolerance in the evolved mutants. Complementation with neither of the yhfK alleles affected the growth of the ΔyhfK strain in BHI (Fig. S1). However, little is known about the function of YhfK or its homologs in bacteria, except that it is part of the sigma B regulon in L. monocytogenes (30–32). In addition, there are studies indicating that the gene is induced in acidic conditions and that its deletion confers moderate sensitivity of L. monocytogenes to severe acid shock (pH 2.5) (30, 33). Here, we compared the growth of the WT and ΔyhfK strains in BHI acidified with HCl to a pH of 4.0, but no difference was observed (Fig. S2), suggesting that YhfK only plays a role in lethal acid shocks.
FIG 2.
Complementation analysis of L. monocytogenes ΔyhfK with WT or mutant yhfK alleles, based on growth curves recorded at 30°C in BHI with 3 mM t-CIN. The control strains had an empty pIMK2 plasmid. For clarity, the standard deviations are not shown in the graphs. The growth parameters (λ, μmax, and ODmax) are represented in the table as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Values followed by a common letter are not significantly different at the 5% level.
YhfK provides tolerance to multiple α,β-unsaturated aldehydes but not to other thiol-reactive electrophiles.
The evolved t-CIN resistant strains as well as the ΔyhfK deletion strain and its various complemented derivatives were used to assess the role of YhfK in tolerance of L. monocytogenes to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes other than t-CIN as well as to thiol-reactive compounds with other electrophilic functional groups (Fig. 3, Fig. 4; Fig. S3). 6 mM t-HEX induced a considerable lag phase extension in the ΔyhfK strain (42 h), relative to the WT (15 h) and the complemented strain ΔyhfK/pIMK2::yhfK (WT) (16 h) (Fig. 3B). Surprisingly, the evolved t-CIN tolerant strains were more sensitive to t-HEX than was the WT strain, with the lag times being lengthened by 10 to 18 h (Fig. 3A). We speculate that the opposite effect of the amino acid substitutions on the tolerances to t-CIN and t-HEX may reflect an altered YhfK substrate specificity of the enzyme. The ΔyhfK strain also showed increased sensitivity, again reflected by an extended lag phase, to citral (Fig. S3). A fourth α,β-unsaturated aldehyde that was tested is 4-HNE, which is a degradation product of polyunsaturated fatty acids that is formed during the oxidative burst as part of the cellular immunity (34, 35). Since the compound is bactericidal at low concentrations and may play a role in pathogen elimination during infection, we tested its activity in a killing assay rather than in a growth inhibition assay (Fig. 4). Upon incubation with 2 mM 4-HNE for 6 h, survival was only 25% for the ΔyhfK strain, compared to 40% and 53% for the WT and the complemented strains, respectively. Finally, allyl isothiocyanate and diamide, two antimicrobials that are also thiol-reactive but that lack an α,β-unsaturated aldehyde moiety, were also tested, but they did not have a different activity against the ΔyhfK strain or the the WT strain (Fig. S3). Overall, the above findings indicate a role of YhfK in the tolerance of L. monocytogenes to antimicrobial α,β-unsaturated aldehydes.
FIG 3.
Growth curves showing the involvement of YhfK in the t-HEX tolerance of L. monocytogenes. (A) Comparison of the WT strain with different t-CIN-tolerant evolved mutants. (B) Comparison of WT/pIMK2, ΔyhfK/pIMK2, and ΔyhfK complemented with different variants of the YhfK protein. Cultures were grown in BHI broth with 6 mM t-HEX at 30°C. The curve represents the mean value of measurements of three independent cultures. The growth parameters (λ, μmax, and ODmax) are represented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Values followed by a common letter are not significantly different at the 5% level.
FIG 4.

Survival assay of WT/pIMK2, ΔyhfK/pIMK2, and ΔyhfK/pIMK2::yhfK treated with 2 mM 4-HNE at 30°C for 6 h. The y axis represents the fraction of survivors after 6 h. The data are represented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). The P values from a two-tailed Student’s t test are indicated.
YhfK reduces the C=C double bond in t-CIN.
Since YhfK is a predicted oxidoreductase of the SDR family, and given its role in the tolerance to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes, we speculated that it could possibly catalyze the reduction of either the ene or the carbonyl group of t-CIN. To investigate this, the degradation of t-CIN and the formation of the three possible reduction products were analyzed using GC-MS in cultures of WT/pIMK2, ΔyhfK/pIMK2, and ΔyhfK/pIMK2::yhfK strains that were grown with 1 mM t-CIN (Fig. 5). The analysis of a sterile medium control indicated that the concentration of t-CIN declined to about 0.7 mM in the first 6 h and then stayed more or less constant until the end of the measurements (24 h). Since the same initial decline occurred in all of the cultures, it is probably the result of reactions of t-CIN with nucleophiles in the BHI broth. Similar losses of t-CIN during culture preparation and the first hours of incubation have previously been reported (20). In the culture of the WT strain (WT/pIMK2), the t-CIN concentration started to drop further at the end of the exponential growth phase (18 h), reaching 0.28 mM in the early stationary phase (24 h). Importantly, the three t-CIN reduction products appeared in the culture, suggesting that L. monocytogenes can reduce both the aldehyde and the ene group of t-CIN. It should be noted that the reduction products are reported as relative concentrations because we did not make standard curves for these compounds. Therefore, a quantitative analysis of the formation of the reduction products is not possible. The ΔyhfK/pIMK2 strain also degraded t-CIN during the transition from the exponential phase to the stationary phase, but it did so slower than did WT/pIMK2, resulting in a final concentration of 0.43 mM after 24 h. However, the most remarkable difference with the WT strain was that the deletion strain only produced 3-phenyl-2-propenol but not the two other reduction products, indicating that it could still reduce the aldehyde group but not the ene group. The complemented deletion strain (ΔyhfK/pIMK2::yhfK) finally, degraded t-CIN earlier and more rapidly than did both of the other strains, and it produced the three reduction products, albeit in different relative amounts than did the WT. 3-phenylpropanal was already detected at 6 h and peaked at 12 h at a much higher level than was observed in the WT culture. Later, at 24 h, t-CIN declined to an almost undetectable level at, while 3-phenylpropanol started to appear and reached a maximal level at 24 h. 3-phenyl-2-propenol was also formed, but this was at clearly lower levels than those that were observed in the WT strain. The higher production of 3-phenylpropanal and lower production of 3-phenyl-2-propenol in the culture of the complemented strain, compared to the WT, can be explained by the strong expression of YhfK by the pIMK2 promoter. These data show that L. monocytogenes can metabolize t-CIN by a combination of ene and aldehyde reduction, without a strict order for both reactions. They also indicate that YhfK is an ene reductase that reduces the C=C double bond in t-CIN (Fig. 6).
FIG 5.
GC-MS analysis of t-CIN degradation in cultures of L. monocytogenes WT/pIMK2, ΔyhfK/pIMK2, and ΔyhfK/pIMK2::yhfK grown in BHI with 1 mM t-CIN at 30°C. Sterile BHI medium with 1 mM t-CIN was included as the control. (A) Concentration of t-CIN. (B) Relative concentration of 3-phenyl-2-propenol. (C) Relative concentration of 3-phenylpropanal. (D) Relative concentration of 3-phenylpropanol. (E) CFU enumeration. For panels B to D, the y axis represents the ratio of the peak area of the corresponding t-CIN degradation product in the chromatogram to the peak area of the ethyl benzoate internal standard and should therefore be regarded as a relative concentration. The lines connecting the data points were added for visual guidance only. All data represent the mean value of three independent cultures ± SD.
FIG 6.

Proposed scheme of t-CIN metabolism in L. monocytogenes. YhfK is suggested to be an ene reductase that converts t-CIN to 3-phenylpropanal. Since both 3-phenyl-2-propenol and 3-phenylpropanol are produced by WT L. monocytogenes, the organism must also have one or more aldehyde reductases.
The antimicrobial activity of the three t-CIN metabolites was also tested. Neither alcohol showed any activity up to 50 mM (data not shown), whereas 3-phenylpropanal retained some activity but was less potent than was t-CIN (Fig. S4, and comparison with Fig. 1 for t-CIN). Furthermore, the antimicrobial activity of 3-phenylpropanal was not affected by the deletion or the overexpression of YhfK. As a result, the sensitivity of the strains for t-CIN (as reflected by their growth curves in Fig. 5E) correlated with their capacities to metabolize t-CIN. The fastest and most complete conversion of t-CIN was by the complemented strain, and this strain also showed the fastest growth in the presence of t-CIN. Conversely, the yhfK deletion strain had the slowest metabolism of t-CIN and also showed the slowest growth with t-CIN. The t-CIN metabolism and growth with t-CIN of the WT strain were intermediate. Taken together, these data suggest that a possible biological function of YhfK in L. monocytogenes is to detoxify t-CIN and other α,β-unsaturated aldehydes in the environment.
A YhfK homolog in B. subtilis also confers tolerance to t-CIN and t-HEX.
B. subtilis has a homolog that shares 43% amino acid sequence identity with YhfK of L. monocytogenes, and, like in L. monocytogenes, the deletion of the yhfK gene strongly increased the sensitivity of B. subtilis to t-CIN and t-HEX (Fig. 7), suggesting that YhfK has a conserved function in both bacteria. Attenuated growth was exhibited by both mutant strains when incubating with t-CIN and t-HEX, in comparison with the parental strain. In the presence of 3 mM t-CIN and 2 mM t-HEX, the B. subtilis WT strain showed an extended lag phase and a reduced exponential growth rate, whereas both ΔyhfK strains failed to grow for at least up to 60 h. Similar to what was observed in L. monocytogenes, the mutants showed no growth deficiency in the absence of t-CIN and t-HEX. These results suggest a conserved function for YhfK in bacteria.
FIG 7.
(A) Growth curves of B. subtilis 168 and its mutants ΔyhfK::Km and ΔyhfK::Erm in the absence and presence of t-CIN and t-HEX at 37°C. Each curve represents a single culture but is representative of three independent cultures. (B) Growth parameters (λ, μmax, and ODmax) were calculated from the growth curves and are represented as the mean ± SD; n = 3. Values followed by a common letter are not significantly different at the 5% level.
DISCUSSION
Like many other plant essential oil compounds, t-CIN and t-HEX exhibit antimicrobial activity toward L. monocytogenes and other foodborne pathogens; therefore, they may be applied in natural food preservative systems (4, 6). In the present study, increased tolerance toward t-CIN was evolved in L. monocytogenes and shown to be associated with single nucleotide variants of yhfK, which is a gene coding for a putative oxidoreductase of the SDR family with unknown function. The deletion of yhfK did not affect the normal growth of L. monocytogenes, but it did cause increased sensitivity to α,β-unsaturated aldehyde compounds, including t-CIN, t-HEX, citral, and 4-HNE. A GC-MS analysis of the culture supernatants indicated that YhfK mediates the reduction of t-CIN to 3-phenylpropanal, which is then further converted by L. monocytogenes to 3-phenylpronanol, thereby indicating that YhfK is a NAD(P)H-dependent ene reductase.
Interestingly, low concentrations of 3-phenyl-2-propenol were also detected in the culture supernatants of L. monocytogenes that were grown with t-CIN (Fig. 5B). This compound was, in fact, a major degradation product when E. coli O157:H7 was incubated with t-CIN (20). Although 3-phenylpropanal was not analyzed in the latter study, it can be deduced from the presented data that 3-phenylpropanal was either absent or produced in small amounts (20). Correspondingly, we could not find a YhfK homolog (with identity ≥ 30%) in E. coli O157:H7 (data not shown). Two dehydrogenase/reductase enzymes, namely, YqhD and DkgA, were postulated to possibly convert t-CIN to 3-phenyl-2-propenol in E. coli, as a transcriptional analysis showed the corresponding genes to be induced by t-CIN (11, 20). Furthermore, the inactivation of yqhD significantly increased the sensitivity of E. coli to t-CIN (11). The purified YqhD protein of E. coli had previously been found to catalyze the reduction of a broad range of short-chain aldehydes, including acrolein, isobutyraldehyde, glycolaldehyde, butanaldehyde, malondialdehyde, and propanaldehyde, to the corresponding alcohols in a NADPH-dependent manner (23, 24). DkgA, on the other hand, is an aldo-keto reductase family enzyme that uses NADPH as its preferred cofactor and shows activity toward a variety of aldehydes and ketones, such as methylglyoxal (36). However, direct evidence showing that either YqhD or DkgA is active on t-CIN or other α,β-unsaturated aldehydes is still lacking. A close homolog of E. coli O157:H7 YqhD, which shares a 57.47% identity (coverage, 99%; E value, 2E−153) exists in L. monocytogenes Scott A (NCBI accession: EGJ25272). As for the DkgA of E. coli O157:H7, four homologs (NCBI accession: EGJ26117.1 [E value: 3E−68], EGJ25830.1 [E value: 7E−72], EGJ26226.1 [E value: 1E−80], and EGJ24325.1 [E value: 2E−90]) exist in L. monocytogenes Scott A with identities ranging from 40.61% to 45.39% (coverage ≥ 93%). However, none of these homologs in L. monocytogenes have been characterized, and mutations in the corresponding genes were not retrieved in our evolution experiments. So, it remains unclear whether they play a role in the detoxification of t-CIN or other aldehydes. Several fungal species, including A. ochraceus (21) and P. expansum (22), were reported to transform t-CIN to 3-phenyl-2-propenol, as well, presumably by means of aldehyde reductase enzymes, suggesting that the conversion to 3-phenyl-2-propenol might be a common detoxification mechanism of t-CIN in many microbes. Versatile aldehyde reductase enzymes are widely distributed in virtually all organisms, and, since some of them have a relaxed substrate selectivity, they can be anticipated to detoxify exogenous aldehydes.
The deletion of yhfK also resulted in increased sensitivity to 4-HNE in L. monocytogenes (Fig. 4). 4-HNE is commonly generated during the oxidative deterioration of polyunsaturated fatty acids, together with some other α,β-unsaturated aldehydes, including acrolein and 4-hydroxy-2-hexenal (34). The α,β-unsaturated aldehyde group of 4-HNE easily undergoes a Michael-type addition reaction with thiol and amino groups of proteins to generate protein adducts, and this reactivity is held responsible for its antibacterial activity (34, 37, 38). A recent study found that two NADPH-dependent oxidoreductases, namely, the flavin-dependent enone reductase Rha1 and the alcohol/quinone reductase Rha2, play pivotal roles in the resistance of L. monocytogenes against 4-HNE (35). Recombinant Rha1 and Rha2 reduced the C=C double bond of 4-HNE, generating 4-hydroxynonanal in a NADPH-dependent manner. However, against 4-hydroxy-2-hexenal, Rha1 and Rha2 exhibited no activity and modest activity, respectively (35), indicating the narrow substrate specificities of the two enzymes. The expression of both Rha1 and Rha2 was highly induced (238-fold and 180-fold, respectively) in response to 640 μM 4-HNE, as revealed via a transcriptome analysis. Interestingly, yhfK was also found to be induced 19-fold in the same study, but its involvement in 4-HNE degradation was not investigated or suggested. Since our work shows that the absence of YhfK completely abolished the production of 3-phenylpropanal from t-CIN, it can be concluded that none of Rha1, Rha2, or any other ene reductases reduce the double bond of t-CIN in L. monocytogenes. Although a role in virulence could not be demonstrated, Rha1 and Rha2 were shown to contribute to the tolerance of L. monocytogenes to 4-HNE in vitro, and the heterologous expression of the genes promoted the survival of B. subtilis, following phagocytosis by macrophages (35). Since our present work shows that YhfK also protects L. monocytogenes against 4-HNE, it would be worthwhile to investigate whether this enzyme also contributes to pathogenicity.
Microbial ene reductases acting on α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds commonly belong to the flavin-dependent OYEs, which are renowned for containing a noncovalently bound FMN cofactor (25, 26). These flavoenzymes catalyze the trans-hydrogenation of the C=C double bond of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds through the reductive half-reaction, using NAD(P)H as the reductant of FMN (26, 39). YqjM of B. subtilis, one of the most thoroughly studied OYEs, exhibits activities toward an array of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes and ketones, including t-CIN, t-HEX, and cyclohexenone (27, 40, 41). An additional OYE from B. subtilis (YqiG) also showed considerable activity toward alpha-methyl cinnamaldehyde, citral, and cyclohexenone (42). Unlike in B. subtilis, OYEs have not been reported in L. monocytogenes, as far as we know, but a BLASTP analysis identified two homologs of YqjM and YqiG in L. monocytogenes EGD-e, namely, lmo2471 (NCBI accession, WP_003732493; identity, 63% and 30% for YqjM and YqiG, respectively) and lmo0489 (NCBI accession, WP_010989492; identity, 35% and 33% for YqjM and YqiG, respectively). The reactions that are catalyzed by these enzymes as well as their substrate specificity remain to be elucidated.
Four independent mutants with increased t-CIN tolerance that was obtained via experimental evolution each contained a base change in yhfK that resulted in a single amino acid substitution (L53F, F57S, T77A, A113P) (Fig. 1). Since we demonstrated that YhfK is an ene reductase that detoxifies t-CIN, it seems likely that the increased t-CIN tolerance of the evolved mutants stems from a higher t-CIN conversion rate by the variant YhfK proteins. Remarkably, the tolerance of the mutant strains toward t-HEX was unaltered (YhfKF57S) or reduced (YhfKL53F, YhfKT77A, and YhfKA113P) (Fig. 3), suggesting unaltered or reduced t-HEX conversion rates by the corresponding YhfK variants. To understand how the amino acid substitutions affect the structure and catalytic function of YhfK, crystal structures of YhfK in complex with and without cofactors and substrates are needed. Nevertheless, even without this detailed insight, our results imply the feasibility of improving the enzymatic activity of YhfK toward specific substrates via natural evolution or rational mutagenesis. The increased sensitivity of a ΔyhfK mutant not only to t-CIN but also to t-HEX, citral, and 4-HNE indicates that YhfK has a relatively relaxed substrate specificity. Because of their abilities to stereoselectively reduce activated C=C double bonds, several ene reductases, particularly OYEs, are interesting biocatalysts to produce high-value specialty chemicals (26, 43–45). YhfK may represent an interesting new scaffold of the SDR superfamily for the development of novel biocatalysts for the reduction of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds.
The results of a BLASTP analysis show that YhfK-like enzymes are widely distributed in many phyla of Bacteria and even exist in some Archaea, although most homologs show only a low to moderate amino acid identity (30% to 53%) (Fig. 9A; Table S2). They are particularly abundant in the Firmicutes, specifically in the Bacilli class, to which L. monocytogenes belongs. Crystal structures have been determined for two Bacilli members: Alkalihalobacillus halodurans (PDB, 3E8X; identity, 50%; E value, 6E−55) and Lactococcus lactis (PDB, 3DQP; identity, 31%; E value, 3E−19). Both are members of the NADP(H)-dependent SDRs, adopting the conserved SDR-typical Rossmann-fold architecture, featuring a parallel seven-stranded β-sheet flanked on both sides with three α-helices (46). A pattern analysis (47) further classified these three YhfK proteins into the atypical SDR subgroup 5 (SDR_a5), which is hallmarked by a glycine-rich NAD(P)-binding motif (Gly-X-X-Gly-X-X-Gly) and a putative active site that includes a highly conserved Tyr-X-X-X-Lys motif, an upstream Ser residue, and a highly conserved Asp residue (46). A sequence alignment showed the conservation of these features in YhfK homologs of several Firmicutes and even of Proteobacteria and Archaea (Fig. 8B). The cellular functions of most proteins in the SDR_a5 subgroup remain unexplored, except for the anaerobilin reductase ChuY of E. coli (48, 49), the hydroxycinnamic acid reductase Par1 of Furfurilactobacillus spp (50), and the divinyl chlorophyllide 8-vinyl-reductases in some plants and bacteria (51, 52). ChuY is a NADPH-dependent reductase that catalyzes the reduction of anaerobilin, which is a linear tetrapyrrole that is produced by the ChuW-mediated breakdown of heme (49). Thus, it would be interesting to see whether YhfK in bacteria, including L. monocytogenes, also participates in heme homeostasis. As in many Gram-positive bacteria, an IsdG-type protein (Lmo2213) was previously reported to degrade heme in L. monocytogenes (53). The ability to reduce hydroxycinnamic acids is widespread in heterofermentative lactobacilli, such as Furfuribacillus spp., probably because it diminishes their antimicrobial potency and because it allows for the conservation of extra energy from the fermentation of hexoses via the phosphoketolase pathway. Particularly in F. milii, the hydroxycinnamic acid reductase Par1 was shown to reduce the ene group of hydroxycinnamic acids and to contribute to fitness during the fermentation of sorghum (54). By analogy, the ability of L. monocytogenes to degrade α,β-unsaturated aldehydes may be an adaptation to grow on plant leaves, which are one of the various environments in which this organism thrives (55).
FIG 9.
Selection scheme of the experimental evolution for increased t-CIN tolerance in L. monocytogenes Scott A. Isolates with enhanced t-CIN tolerance emerged in seven independent lineages with t-CIN supplementation after nine (in 3 mM t-CIN) or seven (in 4 mM t-CIN) rounds of subculture, but they did not emerge in the control cultures without t-CIN.
FIG 8.
(A) Phylogenetic analysis of YhfK. The phylogenetic tree was constructed with a set of YhfK homologs from bacterial and archaeal origin using the neighbor-joining approach with 300 bootstrap replicates. The taxonomy of organisms is indicated with colors. (B) Amino acid sequence alignment of YhfK homologs from Alkalihalobacillus halodurans, Lactococcus lactis, L. monocytogenes, and B. subtilis (Firmicutes), Marinobacter nauticus (Proteobacteria), and Halobacterium salinarum (Archaea), using the MUSCLE alignment program (59). The position of the conserved atypical SDR domains (46), including a Gly-rich dinucleotide binding site motif (Gly-X-X-Gly-X-X-Gly) (blue box) and the active site motif, including the Tyr-X-X-X-Lys motif as well as the upstream Ser and Asp residues (red box), all of which are marked. The accession numbers of the amino acid sequences are listed in Table S2.
YhfKL. mono possesses the highly conserved active site that is typical of the majority of SDRs, with a triad of Ser110-Tyr126-Lys130 residues (numbering based on that of YhfKL.mono) that is critical for the protonation and hydride transfer processes (46, 56) (Fig. 8B). Tyr serves as the critical catalytic residue, forming a hydrogen bond with both the substrate carbonyl-oxygen and the nicotinamide ribose to provide/accept a hydride, whereas the adjacent Lys stabilizes the cofactor nicotinamide ribose through hydrogen bonds and lowers the Tyr hydroxyl pKa, together with positively charged nicotinamide, to promote the proton transfer. The Ser residue stabilizes the proton delivery network by forming a hydrogen bond with the carbonyl oxygen of the substrate. Besides the catalytic site, YhfK also contains several residues that are predicted to constitute an NADP(H)-binding domain, including a conserved Gly-rich segment (Gly7 to Gly12) (participates in interactions with the adenine ribose and the central diphosphate group of NADP+), Arg33 and Ala51-Leu53 (adenine-binding moiety), Thr70-Ser73 (ribose-binding moiety), and Pro149-Leu152 (nicotinamide-binding moiety). Interestingly, Leu53 was found to be replaced by Phe in one of our t-CIN tolerant mutants, which might have an effect on the coenzyme binding. The residues of the active site and the NAD(P)H binding site were not affected in the other YhfK variants.
Conclusions.
By isolating and characterizing the t-CIN tolerant mutants, we were able to identify the SDR superfamily enzyme YhfK of L. monocytogenes to be an “ene reductase” that catalyzed the reduction of the C=C bond of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes. To our knowledge, this is the first bacterial SDR enzyme exhibiting this specificity, and these enzymes may be of interest for biocatalytic applications. The function of YhfK and its catalytic mechanism can be further investigated by enzyme kinetic studies utilizing purified recombinant YhfK and by an analysis of crystal structures of YhfK in complexes with and without cofactors and substrates. The physiological or ecological function of YhfK in L. monocytogenes remains an open question. Our work showed the enzyme to be able to detoxify reactive α,β-unsaturated aldehydes that are generated not only by the host during the infection process (4-HNE), but also by plants on which the bacteria may reside outside the host (t-CIN, t-HEX, citral). However, a role in a metabolic pathway, such as heme degradation, also cannot be excluded. The wide distribution and conservation of YhfK-like enzymes in bacteria suggests an important role and warrants further investigation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 1. The L. monocytogenes strains were grown at 30°C in brain heart infusion (BHI, Oxoid, Hampshire, United Kingdom) medium, whereas the E. coli and B. subtilis strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB; 10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L NaCl) medium at 37°C. Agar was added at 1.5% for solid media. The media were supplemented with kanamycin (Km; AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany), erythromycin (Em; Acros Organics, NJ, USA), ampicillin (Amp; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and anhydrotetracycline (ATc; CaymanChem, MI, USA) when appropriate. The antimicrobial essential oil compounds used in this work include t-CIN (Acros Organics), trans-2-hexenal (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (Abcam, Cambridge, GB).
TABLE 1.
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work
| Species | Designation in this work | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| L. monocytogenes | WT | wild-type strain Scott A, obtained from ILSI strain collection | 60 |
| WT/pIMK2 | WT with pIMK2 integrated, KmR | This work | |
| ΔyhfK | WT with in-frame deletion of yhfK | This work | |
| ΔyhfK/pIMK2 | ΔyhfK with pIMK2 integrated, KmR | This work | |
| ΔyhfK/pIMK2::yhfK | ΔyhfK with pIMK2::yhfK integrated, KmR | This work | |
| ΔyhfK/pIMK2::yhfK(M1) | ΔyhfK with pIMK2::yhfK (M1) integrated, KmR | This work | |
| ΔyhfK/pIMK2::yhfK (M2) | ΔyhfK with pIMK2::yhfK (M2) integrated, KmR | This work | |
| ΔyhfK/pIMK2::yhfK (M3) | ΔyhfK with pIMK2::yhfK (M3) integrated, KmR | This work | |
| ΔyhfK/pIMK2::yhfK (M4) | ΔyhfK with pIMK2::yhfK (M4) integrated, KmR | This work | |
| E. coli | S17-1 λpir | Donor for plasmid conjugation | 61 |
| DH5-α | Host strain for plasmid constructs | 62 | |
| B. subtilis | WT | Strain 168 | BGSCa |
| BKK 10260 or ΔyhfK::km | WT with yhfK replaced by a kanamycin resistance cassette, KmR | 63 | |
| BKE 10260 or ΔyhfK::erm | WT with yhfK replaced by an erythromycin resistance cassette, EmR | 63 | |
| Plasmid | Description | Reference | |
| pIMK2 | Site-specific listerial integrative vector, Phelp promoter for constitutive overexpression, 6.2 kb, KmR | 29 | |
| pIMK2::yhfK | pIMK2 with yhfK gene from Scott A under control of pHelp promotor | This work | |
| pHoss1 | Plasmid for gene deletion in L. monocytogenes, negative selection based on secY antisense RNA, 8,995 bp, AmpR, EryR | 57 | |
| pHoss::yhfK-LR | pHoss1 with 1 kb flanking fragments upstream and downstream of yhfK inserted | This work | |
Bacillus Genetic Stock Centre (http://www.bgsc.org/).
The isolation of t-CIN tolerant strains via experimental evolution.
The experimental evolution of WT L. monocytogenes for increased t-CIN tolerance was performed using six independent parallel lineages, according to the selection scheme shown in Fig. 9. Briefly, 6 colonies were grown overnight in 4 mL BHI broth with shaking, and they were then diluted 1,000-fold in fresh BHI broth with 3 or 4 mM t-CIN. An additional culture with only the equivalent amount of the solvent (ethanol without t-CIN) was included as a control without selection pressure. Two hundred μL portions of the diluted cultures were transferred into a 96-well microplate, covered with a foil (Greiner Bio-One EASYseal Adhesive Microplate Sealer, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and incubated at 30°C with continuous shaking (250 rpm). When the turbidity reached the level of a stationary-phase culture, the cultures were again diluted 1:1,000 in fresh medium in a new microplate for another round of growth, and this cycle was repeated nine times with a t-CIN concentration of 3 mM or seven times at a t-CIN concentration of 4 mM. After each round, a portion of the cultures was diluted 105-fold, and 100 μL were spread on BHI agar. A 6 mm sterile Whatman filter paper disc that had been impregnated with 10 μL pure t-CIN was then placed in the center of the agar plates. After incubation at 30°C for 2 days, 16 colonies that had formed near the edge of the inhibition halo were picked and streaked on BHI agar. The resistance of one colony from each of the 16 isolates against t-CIN was evaluated via a microplate growth assay (see below). The evolution experiment was continued until isolates with enhanced t-CIN tolerance emerged. A selection of these isolates from independent cultures was sent for whole-genome sequencing to analyze the presence of mutations.
Whole-genome sequencing.
Genomic DNA was extracted from overnight cultures in BHI at 30°C with a GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The quality and concentration of the DNA were quantified via gel electrophoresis as well as spectrophotometric NanoDrop and Qubit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) analyses. Paired-end libraries were constructed with a NEBNext Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) and were sequenced at VIB Nucleomics Core (Leuven, Belgium) with an Illumina MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The sequence assembly and analysis were done using the CLC Genomic Workbench software package (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) to identify the mutations that were acquired in the evolved strains, compared to the parental strain, and these mutations were subsequently verified via PCR and Sanger sequencing (Macrogen Europe, Amsterdam, Netherlands).
Deletion and genetic complementation of yhfK.
The pHoss1 plasmid was utilized to generate a markerless, in-frame deletion mutant of yhfK (NCBI accession number, CM001159; locus tag, LMOSA_3600) in L. monocytogenes Scott A, as previously described (57). First, approximately 1 kb fragments immediately upstream and downstream of yhfK were amplified separately with the yhfK-KO-A/B and yhfK-KO-C/D primer pairs, respectively (Table 2). The purified products were joined via overlap extension PCR with the primers yhfK-KO-A and yhfK-KO-D, and the resulting approximately 2 kb fragment and pHoss1 were then digested with BspHI/PstI and NcoI/PstI restriction enzymes, respectively, ligated, and transformed into E. coli DH5α. Then, the construct was verified via PCR and Sanger sequencing with the pHO-CK-F/pHO-CK-R primers. The plasmid was subsequently electroporated into L. monocytogenes Scott A, using the procedure of (29), and purified clones were then restreaked three successive times on BHI agar with 10 μg/mL Em at 42°C to enforce plasmid integration, and passed two times overnight in BHI broth without Em at 30°C. The reversal of plasmid integration was then enforced by spreading a diluted culture on BHI agar plates with 2 μg/mL ATc to induce the secY antisense RNA counterselection system of pHoss1. Clones in which yhfK was successfully deleted were identified via colony PCR with the yhfK-KO-A and yhfK-KO-D primers and Sanger sequencing.
TABLE 2.
Primers used in this work
| Primer | Sequence (5′ – 3′)a | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| yhfK_BspHI | ATATATTCATGAATGTACTCGTAATTGGCGCAAA | This work |
| yhfK_SalI | ATATATGTCGACATGAGCGCGTAATTTGGCTCAT | This work |
| yhfK-KO-A | ATATGGTACCCATAGGGAAATTACGAACTAG | This work |
| yhfK-KO-B | ATTCATTGCTAATCTCCTCCTA | This work |
| yhfK-KO-C | TAGGAGGAGATTAGCAATGAATGACACACCCATTAAACATTT | This work |
| yhfK-KO-D | ATATCTGCAGCTGGTAAGGTTGAAAGACAA | This work |
| pIMK_REV | CCTATCACCTCAAATGGTTCG | 7 |
| pIMK_FW | GAGTCAGTGAGCGAGGAAGC | 7 |
| NC16(II) | GTCAAAACATACGCTCTTATCGATTC | This work |
| pHO-CK-F | ACGATTGATGCAGTGATGTAGG | This work |
| pHO-CK-R | CGGTCCAATGATCGAAGTTAGG | This work |
Restriction sites are underlined: NcoI (CCATGG), SalI (GTCGAC), BspHI (TCATGA), PstI (CTGCAG), NdeI (CATATG), and XhoI (CTCGAG).
For the genetic complementation of the ΔyhfK mutant, the WT and evolved yhfK alleles were amplified using the yhfK_BspHI/yhfK_SalI primer pair (Table 2). The products were cleaved with BspHI and SalI and cloned into the integrational pIMK2 plasmid, which was opened with NcoI and SalI and was introduced in the L. monocytogenes ΔyhfK mutant via conjugation from E. coli S17-1 λpir. Successful integration was confirmed via PCR with the primer yhfK_BspHI, NC16(II) (Table 2), which anneals near and points toward the chromosomal plasmid integration site, and Sanger sequencing with the primers pIMK_FW and pIMK_REV, which point toward the yhfK gene from both sides of the pIMK2 cloning site. The complemented strain was designated ΔyhfK/pIMK2::yhfK. The WT and ΔyhfK L. monocytogenes strains carrying an empty integrated pIMK2 plasmid were constructed in a similar way to serve as controls.
Growth assays.
Growth curves were established with an automated microplate reader (Multiskan Ascent or Multiskan FC, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Briefly, overnight cultures were adjusted to the same optical density (OD, 600 nm) in each experiment and diluted 1,000-fold in appropriately supplemented BHI broth. 200 μL aliquots were transferred into a 96-well microplate, which was sealed with a cover foil and incubated at 30°C in an automated microplate reader with shaking at 960 rpm. The OD value was read every 15 or 30 min. The Excel add-in package DMFit (Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich, United Kingdom) was used to determine the maximum growth rate (μmax), the lag phase time (λ), and the maximal OD (ODmax) value at the stationary phase through the Baranyi and Roberts model (58).
Analysis of t-CIN and its metabolites.
Headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) analysis was used to monitor the concentrations of t-CIN and its metabolites in bacterial cultures, following a previously described procedure, with minor modifications (7). First, overnight cultures adjusted to the same OD were 1,000-fold diluted in 70 mL fresh BHI broth with 1 mM t-CIN in 250 mL glass flasks with the caps tightly screwed so as to avoid the evaporation of the compounds. An uninoculated flask was included as a control. The flasks were incubated at 30°C with continuous shaking (250 rpm), and 2 mL samples were taken every 3 h. A small portion was used to determine a plate count, and the supernatant was obtained after clearing the remainder of the sample via centrifugation (4,000 × g, 5 min), which was flash frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Immediately before the GC-MS analysis, 1 mL saturated NaCl solution, 100 μL 0.01 mM ethyl benzoate (internal standard) (≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich), and 1 mL unfrozen sample were pipetted into a 10 mL amber glass vial with a screw-cap that had a PTFE/silicon septum seal and was additionally sealed with parafilm. The presence of t-CIN, its degradation products (3-phenyl-2-propenol, 3-phenylpropanal, and 3-phenylpropanol), and ethyl benzoate in the mass spectrum were identified using the NIST 14 Mass Spectral Library and the NIST Mass Spectral Search Program Version 2.2 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and the ions that were monitored for each compound are listed in Table S1. For every strain, three independent cultures were measured.
Survival assay of L. monocytogenes in the presence of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE).
Overnight cultures were diluted to an OD600 of approximately 1, washed twice, resuspended, and diluted 1:1,000 in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (PPB) (pH 7.0) in PCR tubes. 4-HNE solution (10 mM in PPB) was added to a final concentration of 2 mM. A control cell suspension, to which the equivalent amount of sterile PPB (without 4-HNE) was added, was included. After incubation at 30°C for 6 h, the cell suspensions were serially diluted and plated on BHI plates to count the survivors.
Phylogenetic analysis of YhfK homologs.
The NCBI (National Centre for Biotechnology Information) BLASTP algorithm was used to search for homologs of YhfK from L. monocytogenes Scott A. The prokaryotic sequences that are listed in the KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) Organisms database with an amino acid sequence identity of ≥30% over at least 90% of the entire sequence and an E value of ≤1E−10 were retrieved and aligned using MUSCLE (59) as well as visualized using CLC Genomic Workbench (Qiagen). A phylogenic tree was then constructed in CLC Genomic Workbench using the neighbor-joining approach with 300 bootstrap replicates. For visualization, the phylogeny tree only displays 104 representative sequences (Table S2) with high identity values from different genera and species. Finally, the constructed phylogenetic tree was edited and annotated using the Interactive Tree of Life web server tool (https://itol.embl.de/).
Statistical analysis.
Data from the growth assay and GC-MS experiment are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) from three independent cultures (biological replicates) for each strain. The significance of each mean difference was calculated using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (Tukey’s HSD) test for the growth parameters (λ, μmax, and ODmax) or Student’s t test (two-tailed) for the survival assay in the presence of 4-HNE using GraphPad PRISM 7.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). A P value of <0.05 was considered to be indicative of a statistically significant result.
Data availability.
All data are included in the article and supplemental material.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by research grants from the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) (G.0C77.14N) and from the KU Leuven Research Fund (METH/14/03).
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Chris W. Michiels, Email: chris.michiels@kuleuven.be.
Cezar M. Khursigara, University of Guelph College of Biological Science
Michael Ganzle, University of Alberta.
REFERENCES
- 1.Lamont RF, Sobel J, Mazaki-Tovi S, Kusanovic JP, Vaisbuch E, Kim SK, Uldbjerg N, Romero R. 2011. Listeriosis in human pregnancy: a systematic review. J Perinat Med 39:227–236. doi: 10.1515/jpm.2011.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.de Noordhout CM, Devleesschauwer B, Angulo FJ, Verbeke G, Haagsma J, Kirk M, Havelaar A, Speybroeck N. 2014. The global burden of listeriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 14:1073–1082. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70870-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bucur FI, Grigore-Gurgu L, Crauwels P, Riedel CU, Nicolau AI. 2018. Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes to stress conditions encountered in food and food processing environments. Front Microbiol 9:2700. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hyldgaard M, Mygind T, Meyer RL. 2012. Essential oils in food preservation: mode of action, synergies, and interactions with food matrix components. Front Microbiol 3:12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Erickson MC, Doyle MP. 2017. The challenges of eliminating or substituting antimicrobial preservatives in foods. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 8:371–390. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-030216-025952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Maurya A, Prasad J, Das S, Dwivedy AK. 2021. Essential oils and their application in food safety. Front Sustain Food Syst 5:133. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.653420. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rogiers G, Kebede BT, Van Loey A, Michiels CW. 2017. Membrane fatty acid composition as a determinant of Listeria monocytogenes sensitivity to trans-cinnamaldehyde. Res Microbiol 168:536–546. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Di Pasqua R, Hoskins N, Betts G, Mauriello G. 2006. Changes in membrane fatty acids composition of microbial cells induced by addiction of thymol, carvacrol, limonene, cinnamaldehyde, and eugenol in the growing media. J Agric Food Chem 54:2745–2749. doi: 10.1021/jf052722l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gill AO, Holley RA. 2006. Inhibition of membrane bound ATPases of Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes by plant oil aromatics. Int J Food Microbiol 111:170–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.04.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mousavi F, Bojko B, Bessonneau V, Pawliszyn J. 2016. Cinnamaldehyde characterization as an antibacterial agent toward E. coli metabolic profile using 96-Blade solid-phase microextraction coupled to liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 15:963–975. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Du G-F, Yin X-F, Yang D-H, He Q-Y, Sun X. 2021. Proteomic investigation of the antibacterial mechanism of trans-cinnamaldehyde against Escherichia coli. J Proteome Res 20:2319–2328. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Domadia P, Swarup S, Bhunia A, Sivaraman J, Dasgupta D. 2007. Inhibition of bacterial cell division protein FtsZ by cinnamaldehyde. Biochem Pharmacol 74:831–840. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li T, Wang D, Liu N, Ma Y, Ding T, Mei Y, Li J. 2018. Inhibition of quorum sensing-controlled virulence factors and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens by cinnamaldehyde. Int J Food Microbiol 269:98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ahmed SAKS, Rudden M, Smyth TJ, Dooley JSG, Marchant R, Banat IM. 2019. Natural quorum sensing inhibitors effectively downregulate gene expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence factors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:3521–3535. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09618-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sun L, Rogiers G, Michiels CW. 2021. The natural antimicrobial trans-cinnamaldehyde interferes with UDP-N-acetylglucosamine biosynthesis and cell wall homeostasis in Listeria monocytogenes. Foods 10:1666. doi: 10.3390/foods10071666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Doyle AA, Stephens JC. 2019. A review of cinnamaldehyde and its derivatives as antibacterial agents. Fitoterapia 139:104405. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2019.104405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Burt S. 2004. Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods-A review. Int J Food Microbiol 94:223–253. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sauerland M, Mertes R, Morozzi C, Eggler AL, Gamon LF, Davies MJ. 2021. Kinetic assessment of Michael addition reactions of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds to amino acid and protein thiols. Free Radic Biol Med 169:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jackson PA, Widen JC, Harki DA, Brummond KM. 2017. Covalent modifiers: a chemical perspective on the reactivity of α,β-unsaturated carbonyls with thiols via Hetero-Michael addition reactions. J Med Chem 60:839–885. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Visvalingam J, Hernandez-Doria JD, Holley RA. 2013. Examination of the genome-wide transcriptional response of Escherichia coli O157: H7 to cinnamaldehyde exposure. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:942–950. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02767-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hua H, Xing F, Selvaraj JN, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Zhou L, Liu X, Liu Y. 2014. Inhibitory effect of essential oils on Aspergillus ochraceus growth and ochratoxin A production. PLoS One 9:e108285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang Y, Feng K, Yang H, Yuan Y, Yue T. 2018. Antifungal mechanism of cinnamaldehyde and citral combination against: Penicillium expansum based on FT-IR fingerprint, plasma membrane, oxidative stress and volatile profile. RSC Adv 8:5806–5815. doi: 10.1039/C7RA12191A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pérez JM, Arenas FA, Pradenas GA, Sandoval JM, Vásquez CC. 2008. Escherichia coli YqhD exhibits aldehyde reductase activity and protects from the harmful effect of lipid peroxidation-derived aldehydes. J Biol Chem 283:7346–7353. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708846200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jarboe LR. 2011. YqhD: a broad-substrate range aldehyde reductase with various applications in production of biorenewable fuels and chemicals. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89:249–257. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2912-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Winkler CK, Tasnádi G, Clay D, Hall M, Faber K. 2012. Asymmetric bioreduction of activated alkenes to industrially relevant optically active compounds. J Biotechnol 162:381–389. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.03.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Toogood HS, Scrutton NS. 2014. New developments in ‘ene’-reductase catalysed biological hydrogenations. Curr Opin Chem Biol 19:107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee SH, Choi DS, Pesic M, Lee YW, Paul CE, Hollmann F, Park CB. 2017. Cofactor-free, direct photoactivation of enoate reductases for the asymmetric reduction of C=C bonds. Angew Chem Int Ed 56:8681–8685. doi: 10.1002/anie.201702461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chaparro-Riggers JF, Rogers TA, Vazquez-Figueroa E, Polizzi KM, Bommarius AS. 2007. Comparison of three enoate reductases and their potential use for biotransformations. Adv Synth Catal 349:1521–1531. doi: 10.1002/adsc.200700074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Monk IR, Gahan CGM, Hill C. 2008. Tools for functional postgenomic analysis of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:3921–3934. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00314-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Abram F, Starr E, Karatzas KAG, Matlawska-Wasowska K, Boyd A, Wiedmann M, Boor KJ, Connally D, O'Byrne CP. 2008. Identification of components of the sigma B regulon in Listeria monocytogenes that contribute to acid and salt tolerance. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6848–6858. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00442-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Oliver HF, Orsi RH, Ponnala L, Keich U, Wang W, Sun Q, Cartinhour SW, Filiatrault MJ, Wiedmann M, Boor KJ. 2009. Deep RNA sequencing of L. monocytogenes reveals overlapping and extensive stationary phase and sigma B-dependent transcriptomes, including multiple highly transcribed noncoding RNAs. BMC Genomics 10:641. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu Y, Orsi RH, Gaballa A, Wiedmann M, Boor KJ, Guariglia-Oropeza V. 2019. Systematic review of the Listeria monocytogenes σ B regulon supports a role in stress response, virulence and metabolism. Future Microbiol 14:801–828. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2019-0072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cortes BW, Naditz AL, Anast JM, Schmitz-Esser S. 2019. Transcriptome sequencing of Listeria monocytogenes reveals major gene expression changes in response to lactic acid stress exposure but a less pronounced response to oxidative stress. Front Microbiol 10:3110. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schaur RJ, Siems W, Bresgen N, Eckl PM. 2015. 4-hydroxy-nonenal-A bioactive lipid peroxidation product. Biomolecules 5:2247–2337. doi: 10.3390/biom5042247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tabakh H, McFarland AP, Thomason MK, Pollock AJ, Glover RC, Zaver SA, Woodward JJ. 2021. 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal antimicrobial toxicity is neutralized by an intracellular pathogen. Elife 10. doi: 10.7554/eLife.59295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jeudy S, Monchois V, Maza C, Claverie JM, Abergel C. 2005. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli DkgA, a broad-specificity aldo-keto reductase. Proteins 62:302–307. doi: 10.1002/prot.20710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Esterbauer H, Schaur RJ, Zollner H. 1991. Chemistry and biochemistry of 4-hydroxynonenal, malonaldehyde and related aldehydes. Free Radic Biol Med 11:81–128. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(91)90192-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.LoPachin RM, Gavin T, Petersen DR, Barber DS. 2009. Molecular mechanisms of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and acrolein toxicity: nucleophilic targets and adduct formation. Chem Res Toxicol 22:1499–1508. doi: 10.1021/tx900147g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kohli RM, Massey V. 1998. The oxidative half-reaction of Old Yellow Enzyme. J Biol Chem 273:32763–32770. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.49.32763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fitzpatrick TB, Amrhein N, Macheroux P. 2003. Characterization of YqjM, an Old Yellow Enzyme homolog from Bacillus subtilis involved in the oxidative stress response. J Biol Chem 278:19891–19897. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211778200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kitzing K, Fitzpatrick TB, Wilken C, Sawa J, Bourenkov GP, Macheroux P, Clausen T. 2005. The 1.3 Å crystal structure of the flavoprotein YqjM reveals a novel class of Old Yellow Enzymes. J Biol Chem 280:27904–27913. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M502587200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sheng X, Yan M, Xu L, Wei M. 2016. Identification and characterization of a novel Old Yellow Enzyme from Bacillus subtilis str.168. J Mol Catal B Enzym 130:18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2016.04.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Toogood HS, Scrutton NS. 2018. Discovery, characterization, engineering, and applications of ene-reductases for industrial biocatalysis. ACS Catal 8:3532–3549. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Reich S, Nestl BM, Hauer B. 2016. Loop-grafted Old Yellow Enzymes in the bienzymatic cascade reduction of allylic alcohols. Chembiochem 17:561–565. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201500604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kumar Roy T, Sreedharan R, Ghosh P, Gandhi T, Maiti D. 2022. Ene‐reductase: a multifaceted biocatalyst in organic synthesis. Chemistry 28:e202103949. doi: 10.1002/chem.202103949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kavanagh KL, Jörnvall H, Persson B, Oppermann U. 2008. Medium- and short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase gene and protein families. Cell Mol Life Sci 65:3895–3906. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8588-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lu S, Wang J, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Yang M, Zhang D, Zheng C, Lanczycki CJ, Marchler-Bauer A. 2020. CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D265–D268. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kim H, Chaurasia AK, Kim T, Choi J, Ha SC, Kim D, Kim KK. 2017. Structural and functional study of ChuY from Escherichia coli strain CFT073. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 482:1176–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.LaMattina JW, Delrossi M, Uy KG, Keul ND, Nix DB, Neelam AR, Lanzilotta WN. 2017. Anaerobic heme degradation: chuY is an anaerobilin reductase that exhibits kinetic cooperativity. Biochemistry 56:845–855. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b01099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gaur G, Oh J-H, Filannino P, Gobbetti M, van Pijkeren J-P, Gänzle MG. 2020. Genetic determinants of hydroxycinnamic acid metabolism in heterofermentative lactobacilli. Appl Environ Microbiol 86:e02461-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02461-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nagata N, Tanaka R, Satoh S, Tanaka A. 2005. Identification of a vinyl reductase gene for chlorophyll synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana and implications for the evolution of Prochlorococcus species. Plant Cell 17:233–240. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.027276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chew AGM, Bryant DA. 2007. Characterization of a plant-like protochlorophyllide a divinyl reductase in green sulfur bacteria. J Biol Chem 282:2967–2975. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609730200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Duong T, Park K, Kim T, Kang SW, Hahn MJ, Hwang H-Y, Kim KK. 2014. Structural and functional characterization of an Isd-type haem-degradation enzyme from Listeria monocytogenes. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 70:615–626. doi: 10.1107/S1399004713030794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gaur G, Damm S, Passon M, Kwan Lo H, Schieber A, Gänzle M. 2023. Conversion of hydroxycinnamic acids by Furfurilactobacillus milii in sorghum fermentations: impact on profile of phenolic compounds in sorghum and on ecological fitness of Ff. milii. Food Microbiol 111:104206. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2022.104206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kawacka I, Olejnik-Schmidt A, Schmidt M, Sip A. 2020. Natural plant-derived chemical compounds as Listeria monocytogenes inhibitors in vitro and in food model systems. Pathogens 10:12. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10010012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Filling C, Berndt KD, Benach J, Knapp S, Prozorovski T, Nordling E, Ladenstein R, Jörnvall H, Oppermann U. 2002. Critical residues for structure and catalysis in short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases. J Biol Chem 277:25677–25684. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202160200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Abdelhamed H, Lawrence ML, Karsi A. 2015. A novel suicide plasmid for efficient gene mutation in Listeria monocytogenes. Plasmid 81:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2015.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Baranyi J, Roberts TA. 1994. A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. Int J Food Microbiol 23:277–294. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90157-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Fugett E, Fortes E, Nnoka C, Wiedmann M. 2006. International Life Sciences Institute North America Listeria monocytogenes strain collection: development of standard Listeria monocytogenes strain sets for research and validation studies. J Food Prot 69:2929–2938. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.12.2929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A. 1983. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat Biotechnol 1:784–791. doi: 10.1038/nbt1183-784. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Grant SGN, Jessee J, Bloom FR, Hanahan D. 1990. Differential plasmid rescue from transgenic mouse DNAs into Escherichia coli methylation-restriction mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:4645–4649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Koo B-M, Kritikos G, Farelli JD, Todor H, Tong K, Kimsey H, Wapinski I, Galardini M, Cabal A, Peters JM, Hachmann A-B, Rudner DZ, Allen KN, Typas A, Gross CA. 2017. Construction and analysis of two genome-scale deletion libraries for Bacillus subtilis. Cell Syst 4:291–305.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental material. Download spectrum.04877-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.5 MB (533.1KB, pdf)
Data Availability Statement
All data are included in the article and supplemental material.







