Abstract
Cytokeratin (CK) 7 is normally expressed in the vast majority of lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). However, on rare occasions, as reported in this paper, CK7 negativity can challenge the diagnosis of pulmonary ADC. Hence, the need to use a combination of ‘immunomarkers’ such as thyroid transcription factor 1, Napsin A, p40, p63 and CK20.
Keywords: Lung Adenocarcinoma, cytokeratin, CK7, CK20, TTF1, Napsin A, p40, p63, immunochemistry
INTRODUCTION
Lung cancer, the most common cause of cancer-related death, is now characterized further by immunohistochemistry that helps identified targeted therapies. This helps for optimal patient selection for specific therapies based on driver mutations. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) not otherwise specified is now classified into adenocarcinoma (ADC), squamous or large cell carcinoma [1, 2]. The latter is the default nomination when all ‘immunomarkers’ are negative [1]. Squamous carcinoma responds to tumor proteins p40, p63 and cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 [1, 3, 4]. Commonly used markers for ADC are thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1), Napsin A, CK7 and CK AE1/3 [1, 3, 4]. Although the sensitivity and specificity of these markers are variable, CK7 positivity strongly indicates ADC [5, 6]. We are hereby reporting a very rare CK7-negative lung ADC and discussing its implications.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 60-year-old female with a past medical history of Barrett’s esophagus was admitted with dysphagia to solid foods. The patient reported unintentional weight loss and needed excessive chewing of food and fluids to wash it down. A total of 1 month before admission, the patient’s esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed an 8 cm, near-obstructing, circumferential, ulcerated friable mass extending from the middle third to the lower third of the esophagus. An esophageal biopsy was done, and the pathology report shows Barrett’s esophagus without dysplasia. The computer tomography chest/abdomen/pelvis findings showed a large subcarinal mediastinal mass, likely representing a primary esophageal pathology as described previously. Other findings included right hilar adenopathy and an irregular spiculated lesion in the right lower lobe, which could represent a primary lung malignancy. Biopsy from bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage revealed a moderately differentiated ADC.
PATHOLOGY
Pathology evaluation from the right middle lobe biopsy showed few clusters of malignant cells, consistent with ADC (Fig. 1). Immunohistochemical staining showed tumor cells were positive for AE1/3, Napsin A and TTF1 (Fig. 2), with ⁓60% Ki-67 positivity. Tumor cells were also negative for CK7 (Fig. 3), p40, p63, CK20 and CK5/6. The overall tumor morphology features and immunoprofile favored moderately differentiated ADC of the lung. However, other primary sites could not be ruled out.
Figure 1.

Microscopic examination reveals clusters of tumor cells below the endobronchial lining. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) 40×.
Figure 2.

Tumor cells are positive for TTF1 by immunohistochemical stain (IHC) 20×.
Figure 3.

Tumor cells are negative for CK7 by immunohistochemical stain IHC 20×.
DISCUSSION
The immunohistochemical stains showed positivity for AE1/3, Napsin A, TTF1, 60% Ki-67 and negativity for CK7, CK20, CK5/6, p40 and p63. Gurda et al. in their retrospective analysis of 72 patients with primary ADCs, showed that Napsin A sensitivity/specificity of 92.0%/100%, TTF1 showed 84.5%/96.4% and CK7 showed 93.8%/50.0%. In 131 patients with metastatic ADCs, Napsin A showed 67.8%/100%, TTF1 showed 86.9%/87.5% and CK7 showed 100%/25%. The TTF-1/Napsin A combination had an 85.8%/93.4% sensitivity/specificity for primary ADC and 87.8%/88.1% for metastatic ADC. The results of this study, based on Napsin A and TTF1, confirm that our patient’s tumor is an ADC of the lung. CK7 is normally expressed in epithelial lung tissue and CK7 negativity has been used as a criterion to differentiate primary lung ADC (CK7+) with enteric differentiation from metastatic colonic ADC (CK7–) [7, 8]. So far, three cases of primary ADC [3] and two cases of primary ADC with enteric differentiation have been associated with CK7 negativity [7, 8]. According to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society, when an NSCLC tumor histology is ambiguous, reclassification could be achieved with either TTF-1 or Napsin A and p63/40 or CK5/6 [1]. P63/40 or CK5/6 will rule out squamous cell carcinoma.
Correct identification and classification of primary or metastatic lung ADC can be achieved by coupling CK7 with other markers such as TTF1 and Napsin A [9]. Current management of primary ADCs includes surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and targeted therapy but none is related to CK7. Hence, its status will not interfere with the treatment approaches. Also, prognostic factors are mainly the depth of tumor invasion and metastasis status, not CK7 status.
There are not enough case reports of CK7 negativity to warrant a reclassification of NSCLCs.
CONCLUSION
Proper identification of primary ADC can be done using Napsin A+, TTF1 and/or CK7. Though CK7 is normally expressed in lung tissue, in rare cases, CK7 is negative in primary lung ADC. Management and prognosis of ADC should not be affected by CK7 status.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
None declared.
FUNDING
None.
Contributor Information
Dimitri Tchienga, Department of Surgery, St George’s University School of Medicine, True Blue, Grenada, WI, USA.
Noelani-Mei Ascio, Department of Surgery, St George’s University School of Medicine, True Blue, Grenada, WI, USA.
Abid Qureshi, Department of Surgery, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Sultana Razia, Department of Surgery, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Genato Romulo, Department of Surgery, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Armand Asarian, Department of Surgery, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Philip Xiao, Department of Pathology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Brice Nouthe, Fraser Health Authority/Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Dominique Belinga, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
References
- 1. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, Yatabe Y, Austin JHM, Beasley MB, et al. The 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung Tumors. J Thorac Oncol 2015;10:1243–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Varol Mollamehmetoglu B, Kocak GS, Erdem H, Bekar Y. Subtyping of non-small cell lung carcinoma in fine needle aspiration specimens: a study of 252 patients with surgical correlations. Eurasian J Pulmonol 2017;18:133–8. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Gurda GT, Zhang L, Wang Y, Chen L, Geddes S, Cho WC, et al. Utility of five commonly used immunohistochemical markers TTF-1, Napsin a, CK7, CK5/6 and P63 in primary and metastatic adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a retrospective study of 246 fine needle aspiration cases. Clin Transl Med 2015;4:16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Vidarsdottir H, Tran L, Nodin B, Jirström K, Planck M, Jönsson P, et al. Immunohistochemical profiles in primary lung cancers and epithelial pulmonary metastases. Hum Pathol 2019;84:221–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Tan J, Sidhu G. Greco MAlba, Ballard H, Wieczorek R. villin, cytokeratin 7, and cytokeratin 20 expression in pulmonary adenocarcinoma with ultrastructural evidence of microvilli with rootlets. Hum Pathol 1998 Apr;29:390–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kapila K, Francis I, George S, Al-Ayadhy B, Al-Jassar A. Subclassification of pulmonary non-small cell lung carcinoma in fine needle aspirates using a limited immunohistochemistry panel. J Cytol 2013;30:223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hatanaka K, Tsuta K, Watanabe K, Sugino K, Uekusa T. Primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma with enteric differentiation resembling metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a report of the second case negative for cytokeratin 7. Pathol Res Practice 2011;207:188–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Inamura K, Satoh Y, Okumura S, Nakagawa K, Tsuchiya E, Fukayama M, et al. Pulmonary adenocarcinomas with enteric differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:660–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Alabdullah B, Hadji-Ashrafy A. Identification of the most specific markers to differentiate primary pulmonary carcinoma from metastatic gastrointestinal carcinoma to the lung. Diagn Pathol 2022;17:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
