Abstract
Objective
Although undernutrition is recognized as a risk factor for mortality among people living with HIV (PLWHIV), even among those initiating antiretroviral therapy, few studies have explored the underlying determinants of undernutrition. The objectives of the present study were to: (i) examine the independent association between household food security, individual diet quality and nutritional status; and (ii) determine if any association between food security and nutritional status is mediated through diet quality.
Design
Cross-sectional baseline survey.
Setting
Gulu and Soroti districts, Uganda.
Subjects
Nine hundred and two PLWHIV recruited into a study evaluating the impact of a food assistance programme supported by the World Food Programme.
Results
Food security and diet quality were measured using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) and the Individual Dietary Diversity Score (IDDS), respectively. Multivariate regression results demonstrated that HFIAS and IDDS independently predict BMI (P < 0·01) and mid upper-arm circumference (P < 0·05). The adjusted odds ratio of being underweight (BMI < 18·5 kg/m2) among individuals living in severely food-insecure households was 1·92 (P < 0·0 0 1); individuals consuming a highly diverse diet had an adjusted odds ratio of being underweight of 0·56 (P < 0·05) compared with those consuming a diet of low diversity. Similar results were observed when mid upper-arm circumference and wasting were modelled as outcomes. Using path analysis, we observed that the indirect effect of food insecurity on BMI mediated through dietary diversity is negligible, and mostly a result of the direct effect of food insecurity on BMI.
Conclusions
Our results provide an empirical basis for focused efforts on improving food access and diet quality among PLWHIV. Addressing the broader structural determinants of food security of people infected and affected by HIV is crucial.
Keywords: Food security, Dietary diversity, Nutrition status, HIV, Uganda
The AIDS epidemic is most severe in sub-Saharan Africa, where chronic food insecurity and undernutrition are pervasive. In addition to the well-documented negative impacts of HIV/AIDS on food security and other socio-economic outcomes in Africa( 1 – 3 ), there is a growing recognition of food insecurity as a potential cause of worse health outcomes among people living with HIV (PLWHIV). Food insecurity – defined as a lack of access to food of sufficient quality and quantity to perform usual daily activities – has been associated with increased behavioural risk of HIV transmission( 4 ), adverse antiretroviral pharmacokinetics( 5 , 6 ), reduced access to HIV treatment and care( 7 , 8 ), decreased adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART)( 9 , 10 ) and worse clinical outcomes among HIV-infected individuals( 9 , 11 , 12 ).
The value of a diverse diet to meet the requirements for essential nutrients has long been recognized. Optimal macro- and micronutrient status of PLWHIV is essential to maximize the period of asymptomatic infection, to mount an effective immune response to fight opportunistic infections and to optimize the benefits of ART. HIV infection has long been associated with wasting syndrome, and being underweight with HIV is a strong risk factor for mortality( 13 , 14 ), even in people receiving ART( 15 – 17 ).
Despite the widespread recognition of the interconnectedness between HIV, food insecurity and undernutrition, there is scant evidence quantifying the associations between household food security and nutritional status among HIV-infected individuals. Food security is a multidimensional concept embodying several dimensions, including the availability of and access to food, the perceptions and experiences of food security and the quality of diets to meet nutrient adequacy. Because of the many facets of the concept, there is lack of clarity in the literature on the dimensions of food security critical for the nutritional well-being of PLWHIV. We therefore examined how the access and experiential dimensions of food security are associated with anthropometric status of PLWHIV.
Additionally, no studies to date have examined the extent to which this association may be mediated through diet quality, rather than food access alone. Diet quality, to meet nutrient adequacy, is a central notion in the definition of food security. Diverse measures of diet quality have been associated with nutrient adequacy( 18 , 19 ) and several health and nutrition outcomes, including all-cause mortality, in developed and developing countries( 20 – 22 ). Therefore, we also investigated whether diet quality predicts anthropometric status of PLWHIV. Finally, it is well established that as incomes increase, consumers shift away from inexpensive staple-based diets and towards a more diverse range of foods such as animal-source foods( 23 ). We therefore investigated whether the pathway between household food security (access) and anthropometric status is mediated through an individual's diet diversity.
The objectives of the present study were to: (i) examine the independent association between access and the experiential dimension of household food security (from now on referred to as ‘household food security’), individual diet quality and anthropometric status among PLWHIV; and (ii) determine the extent to which any association between household food security and nutritional status is mediated through diet quality.
Methods
Study population
We present results from a baseline survey of 902 HIV-positive adults and their households recruited into a study evaluating the impact of a food assistance programme in Uganda supported by the World Food Programme (WFP). All of the study participants were registered with The AIDS Support Organization (TASO), the largest indigenous non-governmental organization in Uganda with over 200 000 registered clients, which has provided HIV prevention, care and treatment services since 1987. Having recognized the threat food insecurity poses to their HIV-related programme goals, TASO entered into a partnership with WFP to provide monthly household food rations to PLWHIV in selected TASO catchment areas. The eligibility criterion for receiving WFP assistance was determined by the WFP's poverty assessment tool based on several socio-economic criteria.
The present study was conducted in two districts in Uganda – Gulu and Soroti – and was nested within a routine programmatic context of both TASO and WFP. Gulu, where WFP targeted TASO clients and their households with food assistance, served as the intervention site. Soroti, where WFP was not operational at the time of the study, served as the comparison site.
We recruited 451 adult HIV-positive individuals in each district based on the following eligibility criteria: (i) eligible for receipt of a WFP monthly household food basket, based on WFP's poverty assessment criteria; (ii) non-receipt of food assistance in the previous 12 months; (iii) CD4 count between 200 and 450 cell/μl; and (iv) ART-naïve. The study participant recruitment and the baseline survey were conducted between August 2008 and September 2009.
Measures
Household food insecurity
Household food insecurity was measured using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS)( 24 ). The HFIAS has nine questions on experiential food insecurity (access) with an option of four responses (‘no’ = 0, ‘rarely’ = 1, ‘sometimes’ = 2, ‘often’ = 3) for each of the questions. Scores range from 0 to 27; higher scores reflect more severe food insecurity. HFIAS score, as a continuous measure of the degree of food insecurity and as a dichotomous variable for the severity of food insecurity (severely food insecure v. all other categories), were both used as explanatory variables. Following Coates et al.( 24 ) we created the food security categories sequentially, to ensure that households were classified according to their most severe response. A severely food-insecure household has transitioned to cutting back on meal sizes, or the number of meals, often, and/or experiences any of the most severe conditions (running out of food, going to bed hungry, going a whole day and night without eating), even if infrequently or rarely. That is, a household that experienced any one of the three conditions even once during the previous 4 weeks was classified as severely food insecure.
Individual diet quality
Individual diet quality was measured using the Individual Dietary Diversity Score (IDDS)( 25 ), a proxy measure of the nutritional quality of an individual's diet. IDDS is the sum of different food groups consumed in the 24 h preceding the recall. The following set of twelve food groups was used to calculate the IDDS: (i) cereals; (ii) roots and tubers; (iii) pulses and legumes/nuts; (iv) vegetables; (v) fruits; (vi) meat and poultry; (vii) eggs; (viii) fish and seafood; (ix) milk and milk products; (x) oils and fats; (xi) sugar and sweets; and (xii) condiments and miscellaneous. Three categories of dietary diversity were created, based on IDDS: (i) low (0–4), (ii) medium (5–8) and (iii) high (9–12).
Anthropometry
Anthropometric measures were the primary outcome indicators. These included: (i) BMI (kg/m2) and a dichotomous variable of being underweight based on BMI (BMI < 18·5 kg/m2); and (ii) mid upper-arm circumference (MUAC) and a dichotomous variable of being wasting based on MUAC (<230 mm for males; <220 mm for females).
Covariates
Covariates included individual-, household- and community-level variables that may be associated with the main outcome of interest. We included age, sex, CD4 count (cells/μl), education (below or above primary level), if the person is the head of the household or spouse of the household head, if the person is in stable relationship (married or cohabiting for 2 years), if the household lives in an internally displaced camp, household size, per capita total monthly household expenditure in Ugandan Shillings, time to TASO clinic (min) and distance to the nearest government hospital (km). We included an access to market variable (distance to the nearest market in km), as it affects food prices, access to information and resources including food. Finally, we included month and year of the interview, and a district dummy to control for district-level unobservable characteristics.
Ethical review
The ethics review boards of TASO, the Uganda National Council on Science and Technology and the International Food Policy Research Institute approved the study protocol.
Statistical analyses
As per our postulated model, nutrition status is a function of household food insecurity, individual dietary diversity and other individual-, household- and community-level characteristics as described in above. We employed multivariate ordinary least-squares (OLS) methods for continuous outcome variables (BMI and MUAC) and logistic regression for the categorical outcome variables, underweight and wasting. Multicollinearity was assessed in the models using variance inflation factor tests.
We tested for two-way interactions between the main explanatory variables (HFIAS and IDDS) and education and expenditure tertiles in multivariate analyses. None of the interaction variables were significant at 10 % level. That is, the association between HFIAS and IDDS did not change depending on the educational status of the individual and household economic factors. All interaction terms were consequently dropped from the final models presented.
We used path analysis with observed variables to analyse the pathway from household food insecurity to nutritional status of PLWHIV, through individual dietary diversity. Direct associations and standard errors were generated for the household food insecurity to nutritional status pathway. Indirect associations are calculated as the product of the parameter estimates (path coefficients) along a given path. Standard errors for indirect effects with two path coefficients were calculated as the square root of the sum of the square of individual standard errors. We used the pathreg command in the STATA statistical software package version 11 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to perform path analysis. We present standardized regression coefficients (β) as well as non-standardized coefficients.
Results
The mean BMI of the study participants was 20·5 (sd 2·6) kg/m2, with 22·4 % of the population classified as being underweight; mean MUAC was 266 (sd 31) mm, with 5·6 % of the population classified as being wasted (Table 1). Mean HFIAS was 15·2 (sd 5·0) and mean IDDS was 6·3 (sd 1·7; number of food groups/d. All individuals in the study were ART-naïve at the time of recruitment with a mean CD4 count of 338 (sd 64) cells/μl.
Table 1.
Variable | n | Mean or % | sd |
---|---|---|---|
HFIAS score | 902 | 15·2 | 5·0 |
Severely food insecure (%) | 596 | 66·1 | – |
IDDS | 902 | 6·3 | 1·7 |
IDDS category (food groups/d) | |||
Low (0–4) (%) | 133 | 14·8 | – |
Medium (5–8) (%) | 685 | 75·9 | – |
High (9–12) (%) | 84 | 9·3 | – |
BMI (kg/m2) | 897 | 20·5 | 2·6 |
Underweight (BMI < 18·5 kg/m2) (%) | 201 | 22·4 | – |
MUAC (mm) | 899 | 266 | 31 |
Wasted (MUAC <230 mm for males; <220 mm for females) (%) | 50 | 5·6 | – |
Age (years) | 902 | 39·1 | 9·6 |
CD4 count (cells/μl) | 902 | 338 | 63·7 |
Household size | 902 | 6·3 | 2·8 |
Per capita total household monthly expenditure (Ugandan Shillings) | 901 | 49 124 | 52 506 |
Female (%) | 648 | 71·8 | – |
Education below primary level (%) | 716 | 79·4 | – |
Respondents who are head or spouse of household head (%) | 798 | 88·5 | – |
Living in an internally displaced camp (%) | 84 | 9·3 | – |
HFIAS, Household Food Insecurity Access Scale; IDDS, Individual Dietary Diversity Score; MUAC, mid upper-arm circumference.
Multivariate regression results demonstrated independent associations of HFIAS and IDDS with BMI (Table 2) and MUAC (Table 3), after controlling for individual-, household- and community-level characteristics. Since we did not include interaction terms in the final models, HFIAS and IDDS coefficients show the unconditional effects. Increasing HFIAS score, reflecting increasing food insecurity, and decreasing IDDS, reflecting decreasing dietary diversity, were strongly and negatively associated with BMI and MUAC (Table 2, column 1; Table 3, column 1).
Table 2.
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMI (kg/m2) | BMI (kg/m2) | BMI < 18·5 kg/m2 | ||||
Variable† | β | t | β | t | AOR | t |
HFIAS score | −0·062** | −2·98 | ||||
IDDS | 0·139** | 2·69 | ||||
HFIAS severity (1 = severe food insecurity, 0 = not severe food insecurity) | −0·642*** | −3·52 | 1·921*** | 3·42 | ||
IDDS reference (0–4 food groups/d) | 1·00 | |||||
IDDS medium (5–8 good groups/d) | 0·454* | 2·04 | 0·814 | −0·86 | ||
IDDS high (9–12 food groups/d) | 0·904* | 2·46 | 0·563* | −2·45 | ||
Constant | 17·222*** | 19·40 | 17·192*** | 21·30 | 0·676 | −0·49 |
Observations (n) | 892 | 892 | 892 |
HFIAS, Household Food Insecurity Access Scale; IDDS, Individual Dietary Diversity Score; β, standardized regression coefficient; t, robust t statistic; AOR, adjusted odds ratio.
*P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001.
†The control variables included in the models were: age in years; sex; CD4 count (cells/μl); education; if the person is the head of the household or spouse of the household head; if the person is in a stable relationship; if the household lives in an internally displaced camp; household size; per capita total monthly household expenditures in tertiles; time to TASO (The AIDS Support Organization) clinic (min); distance to the nearest government hospital (km); distance to the nearest market (km); month and year of the interview; and a district dummy.
Table 3.
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUAC (mm) | MUAC (mm) | Wasting‡ | ||||
Variable† | β | t | β | t | AOR | t |
HFIAS score | −0·527* | −2·41 | ||||
IDDS | 1·138* | 2·01 | ||||
HFIAS severity (1 = severe food insecurity, 0 = not severe food insecurity) | −5·967** | −2·94 | 1·820(*) | 1·71 | ||
IDDS reference (0–4 food groups/d) | 1·00 | |||||
IDDS medium (5–8 good groups/d) | 4·659(*) | 1·80 | 0·938 | −0·14 | ||
IDDS high (9–12 food groups/d) | 8·807* | 2·28 | 0·179 | −1·49 | ||
Constant | 223·100*** | 23·97 | 222·037*** | 25·19 | 0·410 | −0·59 |
Observations (n) | 891 | 891 | 891 |
HFIAS, Household Food Insecurity Access Scale; IDDS, Individual Dietary Diversity Score; MUAC, mid upper-arm circumference; β, standardized regression coefficient; t, robust t statistic; AOR, adjusted odds ratio.
(*) P < 0·10., *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001
†The control variables included in the models were: age in years; sex; CD4 count (cells/μl); education; if the person is the head of the household or spouse of the household head; if the person is in a stable relationship; if the household lives in an internally displaced camp; household size; per capita total monthly household expenditures in tertiles; time to TASO (The AIDS Support Organization) clinic (min); distance to the nearest government hospital (km); distance to the nearest market (km); month and year of the interview; and a district dummy.
‡Wasting defined as MUAC <230 mm for males; <220 mm for females.
HIV-infected individuals living in severely food-insecure households had a 0·64 kg/m2 lower BMI compared with those not living in severely food-insecure households (Table 2, column 2); the adjusted mean BMI, based on controlling for all other covariates in our regression models, for PLWHIV from severely and non-severely food-insecure households was 20·29 and 20·92 kg/m2, respectively (Fig. 1). The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of PLWHIV from severely food-insecure households being underweight (BMI < 18·5 kg/m2) was 1·92 (Table 2, column 3).
We observe a dose–response relationship between increasing dietary diversity and BMI. Individuals consuming a moderately diverse diet (5–8 food groups in the previous 24 h) and individuals consuming a highly diverse diet (9–12 food groups in the previous 24 h) had a 0·45 kg/m2 and a 0·90 kg/m2 higher BMI, respectively, compared with those consuming a diet of low diversity (0–4 food groups in the previous 24 h; Table 2, column 2). The adjusted mean BMI in our regression models for HIV-infected individuals consuming diets of low, moderate and high diversity was 20·15, 20·51 and 21·01 kg/m2, respectively (Fig. 1). The AOR of being underweight (BMI < 18·5 kg/m2) among individuals consuming a highly diverse diet was 0·56, compared with those consuming a diet of low diversity (Table 2, column 3).
The multivariate regression results for MUAC and the specifications are analogous to the models presented for BMI (Table 3). We observed a significant and negative association between HFIAS and MUAC, and a positive association between IDDS and MUAC (Table 3, column 1). Compared with PLWHIV from households that were not severely food insecure, those from severely food-insecure households had a MUAC lower by 5·97 mm, and had a 1·80 times greater odds of being wasted. Compared with individuals in the lowest IDDS category, individuals in the medium IDDS category had a MUAC higher by 4·66 mm; individuals in the highest IDDS category had a MUAC higher by 8·81 mm. IDDS categories were not significantly associated with the odds of being wasted (Table 3, columns 2 and 3).
We used path analysis to present a model where we investigated the direct effects of household food insecurity on BMI, and the indirect effects, mediated through individual dietary diversity (Fig. 2 and Table 4). The standardized direct and indirect path coefficients are presented in Fig. 2. We observed that the direct association of HFIAS with BMI (−0·116) is significant and tenfold larger in magnitude than the indirect association between HFIAS and BMI (−0·011) that is mediated through IDDS. This indirect association, less than an absolute value of 0·05, is considered trivial( 26 ). Expressed in original non-standardized units (Fig. 2), for each unit increase in HFIAS score (with possible scores ranging from 0 to 27), the direct effect on BMI is a decrease of 0·062 kg/m2, while the indirect effect is a decrease of 0·006 kg/m2. The net result of a unit increase in HFIAS score is a decrease in BMI of 0·068 kg/m2.
Table 4.
Direct effect | Indirect effect | Total effect | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Path and dependent outcome | Predictor variable | Mean | se | Mean | se | Mean | se |
Path 1: Dietary diversity | Food insecurity | −0·043** | 0·011 | ||||
Path 2: BMI (kg/m2) | Dietary diversity | 0·139* | 0·056 | ||||
Food insecurity | −0·062** | 0·019 | −0·006 | 0·057 | −0·068 | 0·060 |
Discussion
Although the interaction between HIV, food security and nutrition status is widely postulated, few studies to date have empirically investigated underlying socio-economic and behavioural risk factors for undernutrition among HIV-infected populations in sub-Saharan Africa, where HIV and chronic food insecurity are pervasive. Using a sample of 902 PLWHIV in Uganda, we estimated the predictive link between access dimensions of household food insecurity, individual dietary diversity and anthropometric status, controlling for disease severity and other individual-, household- and community-level characteristics.
The present study reports three key findings. First, both household food insecurity and individual dietary diversity independently predict BMI and MUAC of PLWHIV in our sample. Second, the levels of food insecurity and dietary diversity matter: PLWHIV from severely food-insecure households and consuming the least diverse diets have the highest odds of being underweight and wasted. Third, the effect of household food insecurity on BMI is not mediated through individual dietary diversity. The indirect effect of food insecurity on BMI, mediated through dietary diversity, is negligible and almost entirely a result of the direct effect of food insecurity on BMI. Our paper goes beyond a qualitative description( 27 , 28 ) of the relationship between food security and nutritional status among PHWHIV, and quantifies the association between key dimensions of this relationship in Uganda. To our knowledge, our study is the first to have examined the predictive link between individual dietary diversity and nutritional status in an HIV-positive population.
While the cross-sectional nature of our data limits the inferences we can make regarding causality, our study nevertheless provides new insights into some of the underlying determinants of undernutrition, beyond the disease-related determinants. Our results provide an empirical basis for focused efforts to improve access to and quantity of food, as well as the quality of food through improved dietary diversity, in HIV-infected populations. Further, our results underscore the need for broad-based approaches, regardless of their education and economic status, to tackle undernutrition (both access and quality) among PLWHIV.
The need to integrate food and nutrition interventions is now widely recognized as an essential part of a comprehensive response to the HIV epidemic, and is being rolled out and advocated for by many international organizations( 29 , 30 ) and initiatives( 31 ). Efforts to date adopt primarily two programming approaches: (i) targeted therapeutic and supplementary nutritional support to underweight adults (e.g. PEPFAR's (The US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) Food by Prescription); and (ii) targeted food rations to food-insecure households affected by HIV in several medium and high HIV prevalence countries (e.g. WFP household food basket). More recently, there has been an increasing recognition of the need to incorporate broader solutions to promote food security. A recent review of approaches to nutrition in HIV programmes in Africa concluded that current HIV/AIDS policies ‘have tended toward highly medicalized approaches’ and called for ‘a comprehensive approach to link health strategies with community-oriented food-based strategies’( 32 ).
In an attempt to address broader underlying determinants of undernutrition at the household and community level, organizations are increasingly seeking to integrate livelihood promotion, social protection and HIV programmes to improve the food security of people infected and affected by the epidemic( 31 , 33 , 34 ). Although noteworthy for a shift away from narrowly focused short-term food assistance, this shift in programming needs further refinement. Operationalizing food security in an HIV context remains weak. In order to effectively address the key dimensions of food insecurity and consequently undernutrition, these programmes need to strengthen their focus on promoting both household access to food and dietary diversity. This includes alleviating economic constraints as well as promoting consumption of locally available nutrient-rich foods to meet nutrient needs through strengthened, scaled-up and context-tailored programmes including nutrition counselling and mass campaigns to promote optimal nutrition.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Regional Network on AIDS, Livelihoods and Food Security (RENEWAL) facilitated by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 3ie, and through an IFPRI–Concern Worldwide research partnership funded by the Kerry Group. RENEWAL is grateful for support from Irish Aid and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). The funding bodies had no role in the study. Neither author had any conflict of interest. S.K. and R.R. originated the study, conducted the data analysis, interpreted the data and wrote the paper. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of staff from TASO in Uganda, particularly those at the TASO centres in Gulu and Soroti who were directly involved in the study; the field team and the field supervisor, Moses Odeke, for their efforts in data collection; Robert Ochai and Frances Babirye at TASO headquarters for helping manage the logistics of the study; the WFP in Uganda for its support of the study; and Wahid Quabili for his guidance in data management and cleaning. Lastly, they thank all TASO clients for their participation.
References
- 1. Barnett T & Whiteside A (2002) AIDS in the 21st Century: Disease and Globalization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Chapoto A & Jayne T (2008) Impacts of AIDS related mortality on farm household welfare in Zambia. Econ Dev Cult Change 56, 327–374. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kadiyala S & Chapoto A (2010) The AIDS epidemic, nutrition, food security and livelihoods in the pre-ART and ART era: review of evidence in Africa. In The Socioeconomic Dimensions of HIV/AIDS in Africa: Challenges, Opportunities, and Misconceptions, pp. 74–109 [D Sahn, editor]. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Weiser SD, Leiter K, Bangsberg DR et al. (2007) Food insufficiency is associated with high-risk sexual behavior among women in Botswana and Swaziland. PLoS Med 4, 1589–1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Boffito M, Acosta E, Burger D et al. (2005) Current status and future prospects of therapeutic drug monitoring and applied clinical pharmacology in antiretroviral therapy. Antivir Ther 10, 375–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sekar V, Kestens D, Spinosa-Guzman S et al. (2007) The effect of different meal types on the pharmacokinetics of darunavir (TMC114)/ritonavir in HIV-negative healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 47, 479–484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mshana GH, Wamoyi J, Busza J et al. (2006) Barriers to accessing antiretroviral therapy in Kisesa, Tanzania: a qualitative study of early rural referrals to the national program. AIDS Patient Care STDS 20, 649–657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Tuller DM, Bangsberg DR, Senkungu J et al. (2010) Transportation costs impede sustained adherence and access to HAART in a clinic population in southwestern Uganda: a qualitative study. AIDS Behav 14, 778–784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Au JT, Kayitenkore K, Shutes E et al. (2006) Access to adequate nutrition is a major potential obstacle to antiretroviral adherence among HIV-infected individuals in Rwanda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 20, 2116–2118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Olupot-Olupot P, Katawera A & Cooper C (2008) Adherence to antiretroviral therapy among a conflict-affected population in Northeastern Uganda: a qualitative study. AIDS 22, 1882–1884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Weiser SD, Frongillo EA, Ragland K et al. (2009) Food insecurity is associated with incomplete HIV RNA suppression among homeless and marginally housed HIV-infected individuals in San Francisco. J Gen Intern Med 24, 14–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Weiser SD, Fernandes K & Brandson EK (2009) The impact of food insecurity and body mass index on mortality among HIV-infected individuals first initiating HAART. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 52, 342–349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Tang AM (2010) Weight loss, wasting, and survival in HIV-positive patients: current strategies. AIDS Reader 13, 12 Suppl., S23–S27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. van der Sande MA, van Der Loeff MF, Aveika AA et al. (2010) Body mass index at time of HIV diagnosis: a strong and independent predictor of survival. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 37, 1288–1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Johannessen A, Naman E, Ngowi BJ et al. (2008) Predictors of mortality in HIV-infected patients starting antiretroviral therapy in a rural hospital in Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis 8, 52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Mangili A, Murman DH, Zampini AM et al. (2006) Nutrition and HIV infection: review of weight loss and wasting in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy from the nutrition for healthy living cohort. Clin Infect Dis 42, 836–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Zachariah R, Fitzgerald M, Massaquoi M et al. (2006) Risk factors for high early mortality in patients on antiretroviral treatment in a rural district of Malawi. AIDS 20, 2355–2360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hatloy A, Torheim LA & Oshaug A (1998) Food variety – a good indicator of nutritional adequacy of the diet? A case study from an urban area in Mali, West Africa. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 891–898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Torheim LE, Ouattara F, Diarra MM et al. (2004) Nutrient adequacy and dietary diversity in rural Mali: association and determinants. Eur J Clin Nutr 58, 594–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kant AK, Schatzkin A, Harris TB et al. (1993) Dietary diversity and subsequent mortality in the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Am J Clin Nutr 57, 434–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Oketch JA, Paterson M & Maunder EW (2011) Too little, too late: comparison of nutritional status and quality of life of nutrition care and support recipient and non-recipients among HIV-positive adults in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Health Policy 99, 267–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ruel MT (2003) Operationalizing dietary diversity: a review of measurement issues and research priorities. J Nutr 133, 11 Suppl. 2, 3911S–3926S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Bennett MK (1954) The World's Food. New York: Harper & Brothers. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Coates J, Swindale A & Bilinsky P (2007) Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) for Measurement of Household Food Access: Indicator Guide Version 3. Washington, DC: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Swindale A & Bilinsky P (2006) Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) for Measurement of Household Food Access: Indicator Guide (v.2). Washington, DC: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hatcher L (1994) A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS system for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bukusuba J, Kikafunda JK & Whitehead RG (2007) Food security status in households of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) in a Ugandan urban setting. Br J Nutr 98, 211–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Norman A, Chopra M & Kadiyala S (2007) Factors related to HIV disclosure in 2 South African communities. Am J Public Health 97, 1775–1781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. World Food Programme (2010) WFP HIV and AIDS Policy. Rome: WFP. [Google Scholar]
- 30. World Health Organization (2006) Nutrition and HIV. WHA Assembly Resolution 57.14 of 22 May 2004. Geneva: WHO. [Google Scholar]
- 31. The US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (2009) The US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief: Five-Year Strategy. http://www.pepfar.gov/strategy/ (accessed November 2010).
- 32. Panagides D, Graciano R, Atekyereza P et al. (2007) A review of nutrition and food security approaches in HIV and AIDS programmes in Eastern and Southern Africa. Equinet Discussion Paper no. 48. http://www.equinetafrica.org/bibl/docs/DIS48nutHIVESA.pdf (accessed August 2010).
- 33. USAID Bureau for Democracy, Conflict & Humanitarian Assistance, Office of Food for Peace & The US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (2007) USAID P.L. 480 Title II Food Aid Programs and The President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief: HIV and Food Security Conceptual Framework. http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/humanitarian_assistance/ffp/pepfar_conceptual.pdf (accessed August 2010).
- 34. Academy for Educational Development (2008) Nutrition, Food Security and HIV: A Compendium of Promising Practices. Washington, DC: AED. [Google Scholar]