Abstract
Human cord blood–derived γδ T cells (CBγδ) display a highly diverse TCRγδ repertoire and have a unique subtype composition different from fetal or adult peripheral blood counterparts. We expanded CBγδ in vitro using an irradiated Epstein-Barr virus–transformed feeder cell–based modified rapid expansion protocol (REP). Single-cell RNA sequencing tracked progressive differentiation of naïve CBγδ into cells expressing neoantigen-reactive tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte as well as tissue-resident memory precursor–like and antigen-presenting cell–like gene signatures. TCRγδ clonal tracing revealed a bias toward cytotoxic effector differentiation in a much larger proportion of Vδ2− clones compared to Vδ2+ clones, resulting in the former being more cytotoxic at the population level. These clonotype-specific differentiation dynamics were not restricted to REP and were recapitulated upon secondary nonviral antigen stimulations. Thus, our data showed intrinsic cellular differences between major subtypes of human γδ T cells already in operation at early postnatal stage and highlighted key areas of consideration in optimizing cell manufacturing processes.
Cord blood derived Vδ2- cells preferentially adopt CTL bias differentiation program in vitro.
INTRODUCTION
γδ T cells represent a special class of unconventional T cells defined by their expression of the somatically rearranged T cell receptor (TCR) γ and δ chains. These cells have been shown in preclinical models to elicit potent cytotoxicity against various types of cancer cells including chemotherapy-resistant leukemic cells (1). Early reports (2, 3) suggesting that reconstitution of donor-derived γδ T cells improved disease-free survival in patients with leukemia receiving αβ T cell–depleted allogeneic bone marrow (BM) transplants have resulted in burgeoning of interest in the antitumor effect of these cells. Tumor-infiltrating γδ T cells (γδTIL) have also been identified in various types of cancers and positively associated with prognosis (4–6). In some cases, the isolated γδTIL had also demonstrated cytotoxic activity against autologous tumor cells ex vivo (7, 8). Notably, an in silico study of 18,000 patients with cancer established that a tumor-associated γδ T cell gene signature (GS) correlated significantly with improved overall survival across 39 different malignancies (4), further advocating the application of γδ T cells in cancer therapy.
The choice of γδ T cell source and subsets directs subsequent manipulations needed for clinical scale manufacturing and is an important consideration for maximizing the antitumor properties of γδ T cells in adoptive cellular immunotherapy (ACT). Most initial efforts have focused on the adult peripheral blood (PB)–derived semi-invariant Vγ9Vδ2 T cell subset activated indirectly by phosphoantigens (P-Ag) via butyrophilin 2A1 and butyrophilin 3A1 (9–12). However, the objective response rates from these early clinical trials were generally low and demonstrated suboptimal treatment efficacies (13). This is partly contributed by the functional heterogeneity observed in Vγ9Vδ2 cells in healthy donors (14, 15). At the same time, the identification of the mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cell–like Vγ9Vδ2 population in human cord blood (CB), displaying differential phenotypic and functional profiles from PB-derived Vγ9Vδ2 (15), calls for better characterization of CB-derived γδ T cells (CBγδ). CB is enriched with the more clonally diverse Vδ2− (particularly Vδ1+) cells (16–19). Preclinical studies of adoptively transferred healthy donor–derived Vδ1+ cells documented a promising cytotoxic activity against a variety of solid tumors (20–22) and leukemias (22–24), strengthening the case for their use in ACT. The low frequencies of these cells in adult circulation and their apparent insensitivity to P-Ag stimulation had hampered the clinical development of Vδ2− cells for therapeutic purposes. Nevertheless, improved characterization of these cells in a series of seminal studies (16, 25, 26) has led to the description of various in vitro expansion protocols to expand these cells from adult PB and even tissue samples (22, 27).
Despite progress in large-scale γδ T cell expansion, there is little understanding of the effect of culture-induced differentiation and a paucity in the characterization of in vitro–generated γδ T cells. While it is recognized that stimulatory expansions drive effector maturation, the extent to which changes in transcriptional cell states are being induced in different γδ T cell subtypes remains unclear. To fill this gap, we focused on the mostly naïve, clonally diverse CBγδ and performed single-cell characterization to track their in vitro activation and differentiation into mature effectors.
RESULTS
Expansion of leukemia targeting CBγδ in vitro
We first characterized the γδ T cell populations in our local collection of CB and compared to those found in adult PB. Consistent with previous reports (28, 29), majority of the γδ T cells in PB (60.55 ± 6.99%, n = 11) were of Vδ2+ subtype that was present at a low level in CB (4.25 ± 0.92%, n = 19; fig. S1A). Conversely, more than half of the total CBγδ were of the Vδ1+ subtype (52.75 ± 2.65%, n = 19) and the remaining (38.81 ± 3.05%, n = 19) expressing neither the Vδ1 nor Vδ2 chain (fig. S1A). Consistent with the neonatal origin of CB, CBγδ displayed a predominately central memory (TCM; CD45RA−CD27+) and naïve (TN; CD45RA+CD27+) phenotype regardless of their subtypes (n = 19; fig. S1B and table S1). In contrast, the bulk of PBγδ showed CD27− effector phenotype (TE) (n = 11; fig. S1B and table S1). Together, our data showed that CB presents more enriched and less differentiated source of Vδ2− γδ T cells compared to adult PB.
We expanded the different subtypes of γδ T cells in vitro by a modified rapid expansion protocol (REP) (30, 31) using feeder cells composed of irradiated PB mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and Epstein-Barr virus–lymphoblastoid cell line (EBV-LCL). An average of 2.5 ± 1.2 × 106-fold expansion of the starting CBγδ was achieved in 3 weeks (n = 6; Fig. 1A and Table 1). In contrast, parallel REP cultures of CBγδ and PBγδ for 14 days (D14) showed minimal expansion of PBγδ (4.7 ± 1.4 × 103 and 7.1 ± 6.3-fold expansion in CBγδ and PBγδ, respectively; P = 0.01, n = 3 each; fig. S1C and table S2). The lack of expansion in PBγδ was not due to the failure to activate PBγδ as a similar, if not greater, increase in activation markers CD69, CD25 [interleukin-2 receptor α (IL-2Rα)], and CD107a [lysosomal associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP-1)] was recorded in PBγδ compared to CBγδ upon REP culture (n = 3 each; fig. S1, D and E, and table S3). It was also not due to preferential expansion of Vδ2− cells because the proportion of Vδ1+, Vδ2+, and Vδ1−δ2− T cells was maintained before and after expansion (Fig. 1B, fig. S1F, Table 2, and table S4). Time-course analysis of CBγδ in culture (REPγδ) revealed extensive differentiation into CD27− effector phenotype regardless of the Vδ subtype (Fig. 1C; fig. S1, G and H; and Table 3), suggesting that the poor PBγδ expansion was likely the result of exhaustive differentiation upon REP culture. Together, our data showed that CBγδ is superior to PBγδ for REP expansion.
Fig. 1. Expansion of leukemia targeting CBγδ.
(A) Average (± SEM) fold expansion of CBγδ over 21 days in REP cultures (n = 6). (B) CBγδ subtype composition before and after in vitro expansion. NS, not significant. (C) Average proportion of CBγδ with differential cell surface expression of CD45RA and CD27 over 21 days of REP cultures (n = 6). (D) Chromium release assay of AML cell lines (left) and primary AML patient samples or allogeneic CD34+ CB cells (right) at the indicated effector-to-target (E:T) cell ratio. Graph shows mean ± SEM of three or four independent experiments for each cell line. (E) Calculated absolute number of human AML and γδ T cells in BM of REPγδ infused AML-PDX (n = 15). (F) Human leukemia burden in AML-PDX mice BM with (T) or without treatment (U) of D14-REPγδ. Each point represents data from individual mice, and bars show the average value for each group.
Table 1. Calculated absolute number of γδ T cells (×106) in REP culture.
| CB12 | CB14 | CB26649 | CB39382 | CB39677 | CB40933 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | 0.05 | 0.165 | 0.024 | 0.021 | 0.038 | 0.037 |
| Day 7 | 7.7 | 4.77 | 25.558 | 15.055 | 36.495 | 9.296 |
| Day 14 | 969.408 | 518.056 | 1302.444 | 1219.504 | 3227.85 | 624.067 |
| Day 21 | 49500 | 57820 | 71703.429 | 46666.667 | 301968 | 21634.309 |
Table 2. Percentage of Vδ1+, Vδ2+, and Vδ1−2− cells within total γδ T cell population over 21 days in REP culture.
| Vδ1+% | CB12 | CB14 | CB26649 | CB39382 | CB39677 | CB40933 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | 49.4 | 59.6 | 61.9 | 58.9 | 63.8 | 54.7 |
| Day 7 | 61.2 | 54.8 | 69.3 | 63.4 | 66.3 | 63.6 |
| Day 14 | 64.2 | 55.9 | 65.2 | 54.6 | 63.2 | 61.2 |
| Day 21 | 67 | 59.5 | 68 | 58.6 | 59.7 | 54.8 |
| Vδ2+% | CB12 | CB14 | CB26649 | CB39382 | CB39677 | CB40933 |
| Day 0 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 1 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| Day 7 | 5.7 | 7.1 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 1.9 |
| Day 14 | 3.51 | 7.08 | 1.2 | 6.5 | 3.5 | 4.6 |
| Day 21 | 2.1 | 3.18 | 0.8 | 7.6 | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Vδ1−2−% | CB12 | CB14 | CB26649 | CB39382 | CB39677 | CB40933 |
| Day 0 | 45.5 | 35.6 | 36.8 | 35 | 32.7 | 42.1 |
| Day 7 | 27.5 | 34.3 | 29.8 | 33.2 | 30.9 | 34.5 |
| Day 14 | 31.5 | 35.9 | 33.4 | 38.6 | 32.3 | 32.6 |
| Day 21 | 29.3 | 36.3 | 31 | 32.8 | 32.3 | 39.1 |
Table 3. Percentage of TN (CD45RA+CD27+), TCM (CD45RA−CD27+), and TE (CD45RA+/−CD27−) within γδ T cell population over 21 days in REP culture.
| Sample | Days in culture | % Within total γδ T | % Within Vδ1+ | % Within Vδ2+ | % Within Vδ1−2− | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TN | TCM | TEM | TN | TCM | TEM | TN | TCM | TEM | TN | TCM | TEM | ||
| CB12 | 0 | 73.2 | 1.7 | 25.2 | 77.6 | 0.9 | 21.6 | 90.9 | 0 | 9.1 | 66.4 | 2.8 | 30.8 |
| 7 | 41.1 | 0.2 | 58.6 | 39.1 | 0.3 | 60.6 | 73.3 | 0 | 26.7 | 27.6 | 0 | 72.4 | |
| 14 | 60.4 | 0.4 | 39.2 | 64.1 | 0.3 | 35.7 | 59.8 | 1.2 | 39 | 52 | 0.6 | 47.5 | |
| 21 | 44.6 | 1.7 | 53.7 | 46.8 | 1.7 | 51.4 | 57.6 | 3 | 39.4 | 35.9 | 1.4 | 62.8 | |
| CB14 | 0 | 98.1 | 1.9 | 0 | 96.7 | 3.3 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 36.5 | 0.4 | 63.1 | 40.2 | 0.7 | 59.1 | 48.5 | 0 | 51.5 | 21.5 | 0 | 78.5 | |
| 14 | 64.3 | 0.1 | 35.6 | 67.4 | 0 | 32.5 | 63.3 | 0.5 | 36.2 | 59 | 0.1 | 40.9 | |
| 21 | 42.2 | 0.7 | 57.2 | 44.6 | 0.6 | 54.8 | 50.2 | 2.3 | 47.5 | 36.3 | 0.5 | 63.2 | |
| CB26649 | 0 | 51.4 | 1.8 | 46.7 | 55.6 | 2.2 | 42.2 | 62.5 | 0 | 37.5 | 43.5 | 1.3 | 55.2 |
| 7 | 20.9 | 0 | 79.0 | 21.8 | 0 | 78.2 | 39.8 | 0 | 60.2 | 18.1 | 0 | 81.9 | |
| 14 | 28.1 | 0.1 | 71.7 | 30.5 | 0.1 | 69.4 | 30.7 | 0 | 69.4 | 23.2 | 0.1 | 76.7 | |
| 21 | 69.6 | 0.2 | 30.3 | 72 | 0.2 | 27.8 | 66.1 | 0.9 | 33.1 | 64.2 | 0.2 | 35.6 | |
| CB39382 | 0 | 83.7 | 15.1 | 1.2 | 93.2 | 6.8 | 0 | 93.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 92.5 | 6.1 | 1.4 |
| 7 | 45.3 | 0 | 54.7 | 32.1 | 0 | 67.9 | 29.9 | 0.2 | 69.8 | 27.4 | 0 | 72.6 | |
| 14 | 28.2 | 0.4 | 71.4 | 32.7 | 0.4 | 66.9 | 29 | 1.5 | 69.5 | 23.1 | 0.2 | 76.7 | |
| 21 | 57.8 | 0.9 | 41.3 | 62.5 | 1 | 36.6 | 51.6 | 0.8 | 47.7 | 49.8 | 0.8 | 49.4 | |
| CB39677 | 0 | 72.8 | 23.9 | 3.3 | 70.7 | 26 | 3.3 | 73.7 | 18.4 | 7.9 | 76.9 | 20.1 | 3 |
| 7 | 56.6 | 2.2 | 41.3 | 60.2 | 2.4 | 37.5 | 64.4 | 4.2 | 31.5 | 48 | 1.6 | 50.4 | |
| 14 | 62.1 | 4.2 | 33.7 | 65.9 | 3.7 | 30.4 | 62.3 | 7.5 | 30.3 | 54 | 4.7 | 41.3 | |
| 21 | 62.9 | 4.6 | 32.5 | 67.2 | 4.3 | 28.6 | 60.6 | 5.8 | 33.6 | 53.8 | 5 | 41.1 | |
| CB40933 | 0 | 75.8 | 21.8 | 2.4 | 74.9 | 23.6 | 1.5 | 68.7 | 27.7 | 3.6 | 77.4 | 19.1 | 3.5 |
| 7 | 31.2 | 1.2 | 67.6 | 34 | 1.3 | 64.7 | 28.8 | 1.5 | 69.7 | 26.2 | 0.9 | 72.9 | |
| 14 | 70.1 | 1.4 | 28.4 | 73.9 | 1.4 | 24.7 | 59 | 1.8 | 39.2 | 63.5 | 1.5 | 35 | |
| 21 | 30.1 | 2 | 67.8 | 34.1 | 2.2 | 63.7 | 27.2 | 0.8 | 72 | 23.6 | 2 | 74.4 | |
To test whether REPγδ displayed cross-reactivities against cancer cells, we coincubated the expanded cells with a panel of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines and observed dose-dependent cytotoxicity against all the tested cell lines (Fig. 1D, left). Similar results were also obtained when REPγδ was tested against four different primary AML patient samples (Fig. 1D, right). Cytotoxicity against two solid cancer cell lines, Hep3B and HCT116, were also observed (fig. S1I), confirming that REPγδ were reactive against various cancer cells in vitro. We next turned to establish the utility of REPγδ in targeting leukemia in vivo. We first evaluated the ability of these cells to home to the mouse BM, spleen (SPN), and liver (LV). Nonobese diabetic–severe combined immunodeficient IL2Rgnull (NSG) mice xenografted with primary AML patient sample (AML-PDX mice) were intravenously infused with REPγδ (fig. S1J, left). REPγδ could be readily detected in mouse BM, SPN, and LV as well as circulation on days 1 and 5 after infusion (fig. S1J, right, and table S5), confirming the homing and maintenance of REPγδ in mouse hematopoietic tissues. In addition, the level of REPγδ significantly correlated with the amount of AML cells present in the BM [Spearman correlation coefficient (r) = 0.6, P = 0.02; Fig. 1E and table S6) and SPN (Spearman r = 0.64, P = 0.01; fig. S1K and table S6). Together, these data suggest chemotaxis of REPγδ toward human AML and their subsequent in vivo expansion following leukemic cell encounter at the hematopoietic tissues. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis showed that cell surface expression of both CXCR3 and CXCR6 in REPγδ was significantly increased following culture (P < 0.05; fig. S1L and Table 4), suggesting that CXCR3- and CXCR6-related signaling axis may play a role in directing the in vivo trafficking of REPγδ.
Table 4. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CXCR3, CXCR6, and CCR5 cell surface staining in γδ T cells before and after REP culture.
| MFIstain − MFIisotype | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXCR3 | CXCR6 | CCR5 | ||||
| Sample | Day 0 | Day 21 | Day 0 | Day 21 | Day 0 | Day 21 |
| CB1 | 58.2 | 436.3 | 0.2 | 576 | 49.9 | 24.2 |
| CB9 | 44 | 578.2 | 4.6 | 828.1 | 81.5 | 82.1 |
| CB8 | 50.2 | 431 | 0 | 422 | 29.8 | 32.3 |
| D0 versus D21 P value | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.49 | |||
Because infused REPγδ were able to home to mouse hematopoietic tissues that were grafted with human AML cells, we next sought to determine whether the infused REPγδ could also suppress leukemia in vivo. Co-infusion of REPγδ together with primary human AML cells into NSG mice led to dose-dependent leukemia suppression, with full abrogation of AML repopulation to undetectable level when cells were co-infused at effector-to-target (E:T) ratio of 100 (Fig. 1F, left, and fig. S1M). In established AML-PDX mouse models, REPγδ infusion resulted in sustained decrease of leukemia burden at 1 month after REPγδ infusion in one of the two primary AML samples tested (BM845; Fig. 1F, middle, and fig. S1N). Intriguingly, leukemic cells harvested from mice nonresponsive to REPγδ treatment (BM1043 and BM395 at E:T ratio of 10) displayed reduced regeneration ability when transplanted into secondary recipients as compared to untreated BM (Fig. 1F, right, and fig. S1O). In addition, for BM1043 that harbors a t(9;11) translocation, we were able to detect t(9;11) negative human B cells in secondary recipient (fig. S1P), suggestive of the re-emergence of nonleukemic human hematopoiesis. Our results suggest that the infused REPγδ likely targeted leukemic cells in vivo, causing an increased leukemic cell turnover and resulted in decreased leukemia repopulating potential. In contrast, minimal cytotoxicity of REPγδ against normal hematopoietic cells from allogeneic CB samples in vitro was observed (Fig. 1D, right, black line) and infusion of up to 5 × 108 REPγδ/kg into NSG mice xenografted with allogeneic CB cells resulted in no significant graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) symptoms (fig. S1Q). Thus, our data confirmed that a subset of REPγδ was able to cross-react and specifically target leukemic cells.
Innate- and adaptive-like expansion characteristics of CBγδ in culture
While conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based spectratyping showed that REPγδ were polyclonal (fig. S2A), the extent of heterogeneity in expansion potential in REP culture among different CBγδ clones could not be determined. To evaluate the extent of CBγδ clonal focusing in REP cultures, we set up 382 single–γδ T cell cultures from four CB samples. All the cells had proliferated (albeit at different rates) by day 14 of expansion to give rise to a wide range of clone sizes. Nevertheless, only a small subset of REP culture–stimulated Vδ1+ and Vδ1−δ2− CBγδ cells displayed strong adaptive clonal expansion characteristics, with only 19.4% (74 of 382) of the clones generating >500 cells (Fig. 2A and table S7). The low frequency of Vδ2+ cells in our single-cell cultures precluded accurate evaluation of this subset. To further characterize REPγδ throughout expansion, we performed single-cell immune profiling (scTCR-seq) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in FACS-purified γδ T cells from a CB sample (#47604) before (D0), at midpoint (D7), and at the end of the D14 of REP expansion. scRNA-seq and scTCR-seq from two other cords (#41357 and #41365) were also obtained at D14 of REP culture. Combining the scRNA-seq and scTCR-seq from all three cords following quality filtering to remove poor quality cells and unproductive cells, a total of 4574 cells with paired scRNA-seq/scTCR-seq were analyzed. We identified 16 cell clusters following dimension reduction and unsupervised clustering, with the D0 nonmanipulated CBγδ clearly segregated from cultured REPγδ (Fig. 2B). Gini coefficient confirmed some extent of clonal focusing and correlated well with the frequency of >10 cells clones observed in each cluster following expansion (fig. S2B). Consistently, the top 30 largest clones (ranging 11 to 104 cells per clone) among the 317 clones detected in D14 REPγδ made up approximately half (52.7%) of total cells (fig. S2C), confirming an adaptive immune cell response. Despite this, we noted an increased extent of “innate-like,” non–clonotype-specific expansion specifically among Vγ9+Vδ2+ cells. The semi-invariant Vγ9+Vδ2+ clonotype comprised many small clones (≤10 cells), which collectively formed the bulk (57.4%) of the Vγ9+Vδ2+ population among D14 REPγδ (Fig. 2C, left). This contrasted with both Vγ9−Vδ2+ and Vδ2− cells with a lower representation of small clones (Fig. 2C, middle panels). Likewise, the average number of cells among clones with >10 cells was smaller in Vγ9+Vδ2+ clones when compared against other clonotypes (Fig. 2C, right). Thus, similar to earlier reports on PBγδ (32, 33), we observed the adoption of adaptive- and innate-like expansion modes by different subsets of CBγδ in REP culture.
Fig. 2. Expansion characteristics of CBγδ in REP cultures.
(A) Relative size of single–γδ T cell clone from two CB samples (CB40145 and CB40259) at D0 and D14 of REP culture represented by each individual square. Beige, light blue, and pink fill represents phenotypically defined TN (CD27+CD45RA+), TCM (CD27+CD45RA−), and TE (CD27−) cells, respectively. (B) Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of nonmanipulated (D0) and D7 and D14 REPγδ cultured from a single CB sample (CB47604). (C) Cellular representation of large (>10 cells) versus small (≤10 cells) clones among Vγ9+Vδ2+ (left), Vγ9−Vδ2+ (middle left), and Vδ2− (middle right) cells. Number within bar indicates the number of clones in each group. Right: Average clone size of the indicated clonotype. Each point represents a single clone, and bars show the average value for each group.
Enrichment of activation-primed innate-like cell state among Vγ9+Vδ2+ CBγδ
Given our observations of differential CBγδ cell expansion modalities in REP culture, we asked whether such characteristics were already reflected in preexisting cell states before in vitro stimulation. Examination of D0-CBγδ found that these cells displayed an “innateness gradient,” with median scores of C7, C11, and C14 being similar to invariant natural killer (NK) T, MAIT, and NK cells while that of C5 and C9 were more similar to CD4/8 cells (Fig. 3A and Table 5). The innateness-associated GS (particularly MAIT-like profile) (34) was more enriched in C7, C11, and C14, as opposed to C5 and C9 displaying higher resemblance to an adaptive, naïve CD4-like signature (Fig. 3A and fig. S3A). We excluded C14 cells in further characterizations due to the small size of this population (51 cells, comprising only 8% of total cells in day 0). Consistent with the innate characteristic of being a rapid effector (34), we found an enrichment of cells expressing granzyme K (GZMK) or interferon-γ (IFN-γ) in C7/C11 compared to C5/C9 (GZMK: 43.7 versus 4.8%; IFN-γ: 17.9 versus 0.5%; P < 0.01; fig. S3C and table S8). Conversely, significantly higher percentage of cells in C5/C9 expressed the prototypical naïve/central memory T cell marker CCR7 compared to C7/C11 (22.8 versus 8.9%, P < 0.01; fig. S3C and table S8).
Fig. 3. Variable innate- and adaptive-like cell transcriptome profiles among CBγδ.
(A) Innateness score of nonmanipulated (D0) CBγδ cell clusters (red boxes). Left: Line within box indicates the median, with box limits extend from the 25th to 75th percentiles of all cells. Whiskers capture scores within 1.5× of the interquantile range. Cells with scores larger or smaller than the range are plotted individually. For comparison, the calculated innateness score of prototypical adaptive cells (CD4 and CD8) and innate cells (NK cells) are also plotted in gray. The reference dataset was obtained from previously published work (34). Right: Innateness score of each individual cell shown on UMAP plot. iNKT, invariant natural killer T. (B) Distribution of Vδ1/2/3 cells across nonmanipulated D0 CBγδ cell clusters as visualized on UMAP (top) or summarized in bar chart (bottom). (C) Selected list of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between C7 and C11. Fold change (FC) represents average gene expression in C7 relative to that in C11. (D) Left: Distribution of Vγ9JγP-Vδ2+ cells across all D0 clusters. Right: Clonal representation of Vγ9JγP-Vδ2+ cells within D0-C11. (E) Distribution of Vγ9+Vδ2+, Vγ9−Vδ2+, Vγ2+Vδ1+, and Vγ9+Vδ1 cells across D0 cell clusters. The total number of single cells within each clonotype is indicated.
Table 5. Summary statistics of innateness scores in D0 cells.
IQR, interquartile range; iNKT, invariant NKT cells; MAIT, mucosal-associated invariant T cells.
| Quartile | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell type | Q1 | Median | Q3 | IQR |
| CD4 | −3.94 | −3.21 | −2.58 | 1.36 |
| CD8 | −3.37 | −2.24 | 0.27 | 3.64 |
| C9 | −4.38 | −3.82 | −3.08 | 1.3 |
| C5 | −3.29 | −2.6 | −1.9 | 1.39 |
| C7 | −1.83 | −0.88 | 0.43 | 2.26 |
| C11 | −1.03 | 0.36 | 2.02 | 3.05 |
| C14 | 2.25 | 3.18 | 4.14 | 1.89 |
| iNKT | −1.37 | −0.89 | −0.12 | 1.25 |
| MAIT | −1.26 | −0.84 | −0.4 | 0.86 |
| NK | 2.82 | 3.65 | 4.62 | 1.8 |
Mapping the distribution of the D0-Vδ1/2/3 subsets across the transcriptionally defined cell clusters revealed that all three subsets comprised both “adaptive-like” and innate-like cells (Fig. 3B and table S9). Notably, we found that C11 was almost exclusively Vδ2+ (Fig. 3B). Thus, there were two distinct clusters of Vδ2+ innate-like cells (C7 and C11) as compared to Vδ1+ and Vδ3+ innate-like cells being concentrated only in C7. Differential gene expression analysis between C7 and C11 showed that the former displayed higher expression of T cell regulatory genes such as lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1), IKAROS family zinc finger (IKZF2), and SRY-box transcription factor 4 (SOX4), while C11 had enhanced expression of inflammatory/cytotoxic genes, including cystatin F (CST7), natural killer cell granule protein 7 (NKG7), granzyme K (GZMK), and C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) (Fig. 3C and table S10), indicating an activation-primed cell state. Majority (>50%) of the predominantly innate-like Vγ9+Vδ2+ cells were found within C11 (Fig. 3E and table S11) and were associated with the use of Vγ9-JγP chain. More than 60% of the public Vγ9+JγPVδ2+ clonotype known to have strong P-Ags reactivity (35, 36) was found within C11, contributing to >40% of all D0-C11 cells (Fig. 3D). This contrasts with the Vγ9+Jγ1Vδ2+ clonotype that was enriched in C7 (fig. S3D and table S11). On the other hand, Vγ9−Vδ2+ and other Vδ2− clonotypes were more heterogeneously spread out along this adaptive-innate axis (Fig. 3E and table S11). Thus, our transcriptomic data confirmed variable extent of preexisting innate- and adaptive-like cell states among different CBγδ clonotypes. In particular, the enrichment of activation-primed cell state (C11) among Vγ9+Vδ2+ is consistent with their increased extent of an innate-like expansion mode observed in our REP cultures (Fig. 2C).
Generation of CTL, TRM precursor–like, and APC-like γδ T cells in REP culture
To compare and characterize transcriptional changes among in vitro–generated REPγδ, we analyzed the single-cell transcriptomic profiles of all samples and time points together (Fig. 4A, fig. S4A, and table S9). Compared against the published single-cell transcriptome data (19), majority (56.4%) of our REPγδ were not mapped to any of the described cell states in nonmanipulated γδ T cells regardless of developmental origin (fig. S4B, dark blue bars). None of the REPγδ resembled the exhausted cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) PBγδ phenotype described in the same study (fig. S4B). Instead, we found REPγδ expressing high surface protein level of Fas (CD95) and CD62L and low cell surface expression of CD69, resembling the stem-like T cell (TSCM) phenotype (fig. S4C and table S12) (37, 38). Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis showed that T cell activation and differentiation GSs were heterogeneously spread across REPγδ, and overlapping marker gene sets were observed across the different cell clusters (fig. S4D and table S13). Unsupervised clustering of these DEGs resulted in 12 gene coexpression modules (GM) enriched with genes defining distinct cellular biological processes (Fig. 4B and tables S14 and S15). Enrichment of the aerobic respiration GM (GM10) in C0/12/13/15 was consistent with the strong induction of mitochondrial genes found in these cells (Fig. 4B and fig. S4E), presumably to cope with increased metabolic requirements upon activation in culture. Notably, a switch toward a glycolysis-prominent metabolic gene program (GM7/9) was seen in majority of the remaining REPγδ clusters (Fig. 4B and fig. S4E) and is consistent with the documented metabolic rewiring during effector T cell differentiation (39). Thus, a projected transition from early differentiating cells (C0/12/15) to differentiated effectors (C1/2/3/4/6/8/10) was observed in our REP culture. Cell proliferation status was concordant with the metabolic changes and proposed differentiation stages, with D0 cells being mostly quiescent while D7 and D14 REPγδ were predominantly actively proliferating except C2/10/13 (Fig. 4C and fig. S4F). The loss in proliferative capacity in C2/10/13 was accompanied by the up-regulation of cytotoxic T cell genes [IL-32, cathepsin W (CTSW), and granzyme B (GZMB); fig. S4D].
Fig. 4. Differentiation of CBγδ into CTL, TRM precursor–like, and APC-like cells in REP culture.
(A) UMAP of integrated scRNA-seq profiles of nonmanipulated (D0) CBγδ and in vitro–expanded REPγδ. (B) Twelve distinct gene modules (GMs) identified via unsupervised clustering of marker genes expressions across all clusters. Heatmap indicates the aggregated gene expression score per GM in each cluster. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was used to identify significantly enriched processes for each GM. (C) Cumulative percentage of cells in G1 (nondividing) and S/G2-M (dividing) phase of cell cycle within each cell cluster. (D and E) Relative GZMA/GZMB RNA expression (D) and neoantigen-reactive tumor-infiltrating CD4/8+ (TILneo4/8) GS scores (E) across all cell clusters. (F) Scaled RNA read counts of ZNF683 and KLRG1 in individual cells across all cell clusters. (G) Ridge plot of scaled RNA read counts of CCR7 showing increased level in C6 compared to all remaining REPγδ cell clusters. (H) Selected list of marker genes of C6 cells. (I) D14 cell cluster groupings and annotations identified in our dataset.
Intriguingly, we found that expression of GZMA and GZMB did not correlate with each other. Instead, differentiated effectors displayed highly variable ratio of both genes (Fig. 4D and fig. S4G). C4 was GZMAlo/Bhi in contrast to C1/3/8 being GZMAhi/Blo that resembled the cytotoxic enzyme profile of long-persisting CD4+ CAR-T cells in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (40). Likewise, C6 showed low expression of both genes (GZMAlo/Blo), while C2/10/13 were GZMAhi with moderate to high average expression of GZMB (GZMBmo/hi; Fig. 4D). We found that only GZMBmo/hi cell clusters (C2/10/13/4) showed high enrichment of the reported neoantigen-reactive tumor-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ (TILneo4 and TILneo8) GSs (Fig. 4E) (41), suggestive of these cells being tumor-reactive CTL. In addition, C4 (GZMAlo/Bhi) cells also showed enrichment of the exhaustive T cell GS (fig. S4H) (42), indicative of an early dysfunctional phenotype. This was further corroborated by the highly proliferative nature of the cells in the cluster (Fig. 4C), similar to early dysfunctional intratumoral CD8 T cells (43).
Other than cytotoxic effector genes, our analysis showed that C1/3/8/2/10 also up-regulated the “cell-cell adhesion” GM (GM5; Fig. 4B), suggestive of enhanced potential for tissue trafficking. In line with this, only C1/3/8/2/10 displayed tissue-resident memory T (TRM) precursor-like phenotype (44, 45) of high ZNF683 (HOBIT) expression together with the absence of KLRG1 (Fig. 4F). Conversely, the secondary lymphoid organ-homing receptor CCR7 was found to be specifically enriched in C6 cells among REPγδ (Fig. 4G). In addition, a range of genes involved in antigen processing and presentation including heat shock and chaperone genes were also found to be up-regulated in C6 (Fig. 4H and table S13), resembling classic antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Together, our data highlighted the progressive differentiation of CBγδ into four major cell states upon stimulation in REP culture: TRM precursor–like, APC-like, TRM precursor–like CTL, and early exhaustive CTL (Fig. 4I).
Enrichment of CTL bias clones among in vitro–differentiated Vδ2− cells
Previous studies in PBγδ found that Vδ1+ cells showed distinct cytotoxic hallmarks (46) and were functionally more cytotoxic than Vδ2+ cells at the population level (47). Leveraging on the single-cell in vitro CBγδ differentiation data obtained in this study, we sought to examine whether the reported differences between γδT cell subtypes could be attributed to differential effector cell state acquisition. scRNA-seq–guided trajectory inference identified two major differentiation paths in REPγδ, tracing the transition of the early differentiating cells through the TRM precursor–like cell state to either APC-like (T1) or CTL cell states (T2; Fig. 5A). Mapping of TCR clonotype across the different cell states showed preferential enrichment of Vδ2+ cells in the APC-like cell cluster (C6), with 43% of these Vδ2+ cells also being Vγ9+ (Fig. 5B). This suggested that Vδ2+ (especially Vγ9+Vδ2+) cells had enhanced ability to differentiate into the less cytotoxic APC-like cells compared to Vδ1/3+ cells. At the clonal level, most γδ T cell clones regardless of their Vδ subtype generated both cell states as they differentiate in REP culture. However, we observed that majority of Vδ1+ and Vδ3+ clones were bias toward producing CTL than APC-like cells (Fig. 5C). This differentiation bias was more pronounced among large (>10 cells), adaptive-like Vδ1+ and Vδ3+ clones as we did not observe any such clones being APC-like bias (fig. S5A, top). In contrast, a more balanced mix of both APC-like bias and CTL bias clones was found within Vδ2+ cells, especially among Vγ9+Vδ2+ clones (Fig. 5C, right, and fig. S5A). Together, our data highlighted the enrichment of CTL bias clones specifically among Vδ1/3+ cells, contributing to their overall increased cytotoxic activities over Vδ2+ cells. When we separately expanded FACS-purified Vδ1+/2+/1−2− cells (n = 4), we confirmed that the expanded Vδ2+ cells produced relatively lower level of a whole range of cytokines compared to Vδ1+/1−2− cells (Fig. 5D and table S16).
Fig. 5. Effector differentiation trajectory of CBγδ in REP culture.
(A) Slingshot inferred differentiation trajectories (T1 and T2) of CBγδ in REP culture. (B) Percentage of the indicated clonotypes of REPγδ within each of the D14 cell clusters. (C) Percentage of TRM precursor–like cells, APC-like cells, and CTL (left) and ratio of APC-like cells to CTL (right) within each individual REPγδ clone of the indicated clonotype (Vδ1+, Vδ3+, Vγ9−Vδ2+, and Vγ9+Vδ2+). Left: Line within box indicates the median, with box limits extend from the 25th to 75th percentiles of all clones. Whiskers are drawn down to the 10th percentile and up to the 90th. Right: Each point represents single-clone data, and bar shows the geometric mean value of all clones within the same clonotype. (D) Relative amount of the indicated human cytokine secreted into D14-REP culture supernatant. Cytokines and γδ T cell subtypes (Vδ1+, Vδ 2+, and Vδ1−2−) were clustered using Euclidean distance and average linkage. MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein (E) UMAP using scRNA-seq of D15, K562-exposed cells. (F) Boxplot showing the ratio of GZMA to GZMB in annotated D14 cell types and D15 cell clusters. Line within box indicates the median, with box limits extend from the 25th to 75th percentiles of all cells. Whiskers capture scores within 1.5× of the interquantile range. Cells with scores larger or smaller than the range are plotted individually. (G) Left: Distribution of Vδ1+/2+/3+ γδ T cells across all D15 cell clusters. Right: Proportion of Vδ1+/2+/3+ γδ T cells within D15-C3.
We also asked whether the preferential acquisition of CTL bias differentiation program by Vδ1/3+ clones was induced specifically by the EBV antigens presented on the feeder cell line. To address this, we further challenged D14 REPγδ cells with EBV-negative K562 leukemic cell line. After quantification of gene expression, we performed clustering of both K562-challenged (D15) and D14 REPγδ cells. Changes in transcriptomic profile were observed following 24 hours of exposure of to K562 (fig. S5B, left). Cells were well separated by treatment condition, and there was an enrichment of genes involved in various immunoregulatory processes including effector differentiation and antigen presentation in the D15, K562-exposed population (fig. S5B, middle and right panels, and table S17). This confirmed that D14 REPγδ were cross-reactive to K562. We next performed reclustering and low-dimensional embedding of the D15 cells, identifying eight cell populations following K562 challenge (Fig. 5E). To examine the cytotoxic potential of these cells, we evaluated their relative GZMA/B expression and observed that majority of D15 cell clusters had a low GZMA/GZMB expression ratio resembling that of D14-CTL (Fig. 5F). Compared to D14 REPγδ, D15 cells showed a general increase in GZMB expression while maintaining high GZMA expression (fig. S5C). These data suggested further effector differentiation of D14 REPγδ into D15 cells upon K562 exposure, resulting in a more homogeneously cytotoxic population. In line with this, one of the D15 cell clusters (C0) emerged to show an NK-like dysfunctional T cell phenotype (42), with elevated cell surface expression of NK receptors (NKG2D, NKp30, and CD56) and immune checkpoint receptors [T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 3 (TIM3), lymphocyte activating 3 (LAG3), and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1); fig. S5D]. Consistently, when we compared the expression profiles of D15 cell clusters to the GSs of our previously identified D14 REPγδ cell states (differentiating; TRM precursor–like, APC-like, TRM precursor–like CTL, and early exhaustive CTL), we also found that D15-C0 showed a high resemblance to early exhaustive CTL (fig. S5E). On the other hand, the transcription signature of D15-C3 was particularly similar to APC-like cells (fig. S5E), whereas the remaining D15 cell clusters were more like TRM precursor–like CTL (fig. S5E). Notably, in addition to differentiated effector GS, all D15 cell clusters also displayed GS of less differentiated (TRM precursor–like/early differentiating) cell states (fig. S5E). These data advocated that the bulk of the cells present in culture for at least 24 hours after K562-challenge was likely derived from recent differentiation of D14-early effectors/precursors and not contributed by the persistence of D14 mature effectors.
Clonotype analysis revealed that Vδ2+ comprised a much higher fraction of D15-C3 cells (15.1% of Vδ2+ versus 5.6 and 7.1% of Vδ1+ and Vδ3+, respectively), resulting in an enrichment of Vδ2+ (57.9%) within D15-C3 (Fig. 5G and tables S18 and S19). To further rule out that Vδ2+ enrichment was contributed by the persistence of residual D14-Vδ2+ APC-like cells in culture, we turned to focus on only D15 cells with a TRM precursor–like expression profile (i.e., less differentiated than APC-like cells) and found similar observations (fig. S5F and tables S18 and S19). Together, our data showed that both EBV-LCL and K562 stimulation induced a discordance in effector differentiation between γδ T subtypes in vitro, with the preferential acquisition of a CTL bias differentiation program specifically by Vδ1+ and Vδ3+ cells.
DISCUSSION
ACT relies heavily on in vitro cell expansion to generate sufficient immune effector cells to induce treatment response. In the γδ T cell space, success in P-Ag–induced Vδ2+ cell expansion has led to the development of γδ T cell–based cancer immunotherapy (48). However, past suboptimal clinical experiences in Vδ2+-based cancer therapy trials (13) coupled with the lack of characterization of the different subtypes of γδ T cells had significantly impeded its clinical application. We argue that better characterization of both the starting cell source and in vitro–generated γδ T cell products with respect to its repertoire composition and functional and exhaustion status can guide process design to improved potency.
In this study, we demonstrated a scalable in vitro expansion of all subtypes of CBγδ using a modified REP culture. Comparison between parallel CBγδ and PBγδ cultures confirmed the significantly higher expansion potential in the former due to their less differentiated nature. A substantial fraction of the expanded CBγδ displayed a TSCM-like phenotype that has been associated with superior antitumor activity in adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells (37, 49, 50). Consistent with earlier studies (16, 32), we showed that both innate- and adaptive-like expansion characteristics are differentially adopted by various γδ T cells subtype. Moreover, such cell expansion traits can also be correlated to their preexisting transcription cell states. Specifically, our data confirmed that CB-derived Vγ9+Vδ2+ cells were associated with a strongly innate-like transcription program as opposed to other γδ T cell clonotypes spreading more heterogeneously across the adaptive-innate axis. This has implications in expanded γδ T cell product repertoire complexity, dependent upon the relative ratio of innate- and adaptive-like γδ T cells present in the starting cell materials.
Progressive differentiation and acquisition of heterogeneous functional states were seen across the expanded cells in REP culture and could potentially recapitulate the developmental trajectories of newborn γδ T cells following antigen encounter as previously described (29, 51, 52). Further investigations are required to elucidate how the different developmental programs are initiated and regulated. Nevertheless, our REP culture starting from CBγδ produced a spectrum of cells capable of eliciting complementary functions at the population level, including CTL, TRM precursor–like, and APC-like cells. The presence of TRM precursor–like cells suggests preferential tissue-homing ability and is a beneficial characteristic for adoptive cell therapy products. In addition, these cells also showed a high expression of GZMA that has been demonstrated to display noncytotoxic immune regulations (53, 54), enhancing the role of these TRM precursor–like cells in orchestrating tissue homeostasis and repair that are often attributed to Vδ1+ cells (55). On the other hand, antigen-presenting Vδ2+ cells have also been previously reported to induce both CD4 and CD8 T cell response (56, 57). Thus, adoptive transfer of these cells may have the potential to cross activate host immunity to elicit a sustained treatment response.
The γδ T cell subtype–specific differentiation programs observed in our cultures substantiate previous observations in PBγδ (46). In particular, the preferential adoption of CTL bias differentiation program displayed by Vδ1/3+ cells provides a mechanistic insight to early observations that both freshly isolated and in vitro–expanded Vδ1+ cells were relatively more cytotoxic compared to Vδ2+ cells (47). Our data suggest that the observed differences in differentiation programs are not solely dictated by external stimuli but are more likely dependent upon preexisting transcriptional programs inherent to the specific γδ T cell subsets. With a predominantly innate-like expression profile particularly among Vγ9+Vδ2+ cells, one could speculate that the mostly small-sized CTL and APC-like bias Vγ9+Vδ2+ clones were derived from the two major innate-like cell clusters D0-C11 and D0-C7, respectively. The lack of D0-C11 cells among Vδ1/3+ suggested that CTL bias Vδ1/3+ clones were mainly derived from adaptive-like D0 (C5/9) cells, whereas Vδ1/3+ D0-C7 cells could have similarly contributed to the small APC-like bias Vδ1/3+ clones. This could also explain why no APC-like bias clones were seen among large Vδ1/3+ clones. Further investigations are required to validate such causal relationship. Despite variable differentiation programs, note that our clonal tracing confirmed that majority of the activated γδ T cell clones followed more than one differentiation trajectories to generate multiple effector cell types. This implies that, even in an extreme clonally focus γδ T cell expansion culture, functional diversity is always seen among the expanded cells, although the proportion of cells with different cell states can vary significantly between γδ T cell clonotypes. In this regard, one can deduce that, while functional efficacy in cancer targeting is likely dictated by the specific TCR-clonotype, the overall potency of conventionally expanded Vδ2+- and Vδ1+- focused cell products will be determined by an ideal cell state ratio that is probably context or disease dependent. With respect to this, studies in CD8+ T cells have already shown that less differentiated effectors (37, 49) or even a more primitive cell source of effectors (50) make more potent adoptive cell therapy products.
In summary, we provide evidence to show that CBγδ comprising a complex TCRγδ repertoire with variable innate- and adaptive-like cell states is an attractive alternative immune cell type for ACT. Our identification of transcriptionally distinct cell states among both pre- and post-culture expanded γδ T cells calls for more robust characterization of the starting cell source and expanded cell products, with the larger implication that specific cell state compositions can confer superior cancer targeting potential in a context-dependent manner.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design
To expand CBγδ and PBγδ, REP cultures were set up for 14 to 21 days for a total of 28 CB and three PB samples. In vitro cytotoxic activity of REPγδ was assayed for 12 batches of REPγδ upon fresh cell harvest at D14 and D21 of culture. Cytokine secretions were assayed for three batches of REPγδ. In vivo tissue-homing capabilities and cytotoxic activities against human AML cells were assayed for two and four batches of the REPγδ, respectively. To determine heterogeneity in γδ T cell clonal expansion kinetics, single–γδ T cell REP cultures were set up for four of the CB samples. To characterize the γδ T cell state composition and repertoire complexity upon expansion in REP cultures, scRNA-seq coupled with surface protein quantification and TCRγδ sequencing were performed in D14 REPγδ generated from three different human CB samples using the 10X Genomics Chromium platform. Among these three samples, one of the samples also had aliquots of cells harvested at serial time points (D0 and D7 of REP culture as well as 1 day after K562 exposure, “D15”) for multiplex single-cell immune profiling.
Primary human cells
CB from anonymized normal, full-term infants were obtained from Singapore Cord Blood Bank (SCBB), and the mononuclear cell (MNC) fraction was isolated by centrifugation on Ficoll-Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor–mobilized PB from normal donors and BM MNC of primary AML patients (table S20) were obtained from the hematology repository in Singapore General Hospital. Human cell usage in this study was reviewed and approved by the SCBB Research Advisory Ethics Committee and the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board. For cell surface phenotype analysis, cells were stained with the respective antibodies on ice for at least 30 min. All antibodies used for flow cytometry are listed in table S21. Flow cytometry analyses were performed with LSRFortessa Analyzer (BD Biosciences), and FACS was performed using FACSAria III (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using FlowJo 10.6.1 (Tree Star Inc.).
Modified REP culture
γδ T cells were first enriched from CB MNCs using an EasySep Human γδ T cell isolation kit (STEMCELL Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For separate expansion of Vδ1+, Vδ2+, and Vδ1−2− subsets, cells were first FACS-purified. Cells were then mixed with feeder cells consisting of irradiated normal human PBMCs and EBV-LCLs at the ratio of 1:50:100 in RPMI 1640 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and cytokine combo [recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2; 170 U/ml), rhIL-15 (25 U/ml), and rhIL-21 (0.7 U/ml), all from Miltenyi Biotec]. The cell mixture was first seeded onto plates precoated with 0.3 μg/cm2 pan TCRγδ antibody (clone IMMU510 from Beckman Coulter) and cultured for 2 days. Subsequently, cells were transferred to G-Rex flasks (Wilson-Wolf, USA, for bulks cell or subset expansion) or noncoated 96-well plate (for single–γδ T clone expansion) and cultured for another 2 to 3 weeks according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Fresh cytokine comb was added to the culture every 2 to 3 days. At weekly interval, the total number of γδ T in culture was enumerated with the supplementation of irradiated PBMCs and EBV-LCLs at the ratio of 1:10:20, respectively. To reduce the volume of cells in culture, only a fraction of the cells was reseeded back into G-Rex flasks for another week of culture. Overall fold expansion and absolute number of γδ T cell at final cell harvest were calculated, assuming that all cells were expanded.
In vitro cytotoxic assay
Target cells were labeled with 51Cr for 2 hours before being co-cultured with the expanded γδ T cells at various E:T cell ratios for 5 to 6 hours. Radioactive counts in the supernatant were then read with a Wallac Wizard 1470 gamma counter (PerkinElmer). Negative and positive controls were determined in target cells with no treatment and treated with 2% Triton X-100, respectively. Percent specific cytotoxicity was determined as [(sample-negative control)/(positive control-negative control)] × 100%. For all cell line targets, duplicate wells were set up, and the average radioactive counts were recorded for each E:T ratio within the same experiment. Graph shows the means ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. For each primary cell target, single well was set up for each E:T ratio in a single experiment.
In vitro cytokine secretion profiling
Harvested REPγδ were first washed and resuspended in fresh RPMI 1640 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS and rhIL-2 (170 U/ml; Miltenyi Biotec). Cells were then incubated at 37°C for 1 day before culture supernatant was collected. Secreted cytokines were measured with a Luminex assay using ProcartaPlex customized human cytokine 19-plex panel [IL-1β, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-18, IL-22, IL-12/IL-23 (p40), IL-27, IFN-γ, TNF-α, CCL2, CCL4, CD62E, granzyme A, and granzyme B; Thermo Fisher Scientific] according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This sandwich reaction occurred in wall-less DropArray (DA)–Bead plates (Curiox) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (https://youtu.be/P6ShRhE1GKE). Briefly, the wall-less DA-Bead plate was blocked with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (dPBS) containing 1% bovine serum albumin for 30 min. Ten microliters of culture supernatant was loaded onto the plate with preloaded magnet beads and incubated for 2 hours. The reaction was further incubated with 10 μl of detection antibody for 1 hour and 5 μl of streptavidin-phycoerythrine for 30 min. All incubations occurred on a 1-cm span orbital shaker at 385 rpm at room temperature. The plate was washed three times in the LT-MX washer between these three incubation steps. Plates were read on a Milliplex analyzer (Millipore) with Luminex xPONENT software. Calculated cytokine concentrations (picograms per milliliter) for each sample (n = 4 × 3 γδ T cell subtypes) were fed into ClustVis (58) for relative comparison visualized in heatmap. For each cytokine, median of the four samples within each γδ T cell subtype was taken. Values on each row (cytokine) were centered, and unit variance scaling was applied. Both rows (cytokines) and columns (γδ T cell subtypes) were clustered using Euclidean distance and average linkage.
In vivo assays in immunodeficient mice
NSG mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory and maintained in Vivarium in Duke-NUS Medical School. Six- to 10-week-old mice were sublethally irradiated with 220 cGy of 137Cs γ-rays before transplantation. All animal experiments were performed with the approval of the SingHealth Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and experiments were performed in accordance with the SingHealth Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. For hematopoietic repopulation, between 106 and 107 CB or AML cells were intravenously injected into mice within 24 hours after irradiation. Expanded γδ T cells were infused into mice via tail vein according to different experimental setups. For GvHD studies, 1 × 105 CD34-enriched CB cells were infused into mice alone or together with 1 × 107 to 2 × 107 REPγδ. In the control group, between 1 × 107 and 2 × 107 PBMCs were infused into mice. In coinfusion experiments, expanded REPγδ were intravenously injected into mice between 30 and 120 min after the first cell infusion (either CB or AML). For treatment of preestablished AML-PDX, 1 × 107 (for targeting against BM845) or 2.6 × 107 (for targeting against BM1043) expanded REPγδ were infused 1 to 2 months after AML cell transplantation. Mice were then analyzed at 3 to 4 weeks after REPγδ infusion. In all mice, rhIL-2 of 6.4 × 106 U/kg, rhIL-15 of 1.3 × 105 U/kg, and rhIL-21 of 2 × 103 U/kg were intraperitoneally injected twice a week starting from day 2 after REPγδ infusion (all cytokines from Miltenyi Biotec).
Mouse sample analysis and secondary transplantation
For REPγδ tissue-homing experiments where absolute human cell counts were computed, BM cells collected from two tibias and two femurs, 25% of whole mouse LV, whole mouse SPN, and 500 μl of mouse PB were used for further processing for flow cytometry analysis. Single-cell suspensions of mouse BM, LV, and SPN samples in staining buffer (phosphate-buffered saline and 2% FBS) were obtained by vortexing or physical grinding and filtering over 0.4-μm cell strainer. Red blood cells (RBCs) were first lysed with 0.8% NH4Cl on ice for 5 min before staining with antibodies. Mouse PB samples collected in K3-EDTA–coated tubes were directly stained with antibodies before RBC lysis was performed. To enable absolute cell count calculation, AccuCheck counting beads (Invitrogen) were added to the sample before flow cytometry analysis was performed. Human γδT cells were defined as CD45+CD3+TCRγδ+, while human AML cells were defined as CD45+CD3−TCRγδ− in REPγδ tissue-homing experiments and CD45+CD15/33+CD19/20−CD3− in all other mouse experiments. All AML-PDX models were validated to have repopulated exclusively with human myeloid cells, with undetectable level of human B (CD45+CD19/20+CD15/33−CD3−) and T (CD45+CD3+CD19/20/15/33−) cells before any REPγδ treatment. For secondary transplantation, total BM cells were flushed from all long bones (two tibias and two femurs) and pelvis and processed as described above. For BM395, samples collected from primary mice within the same treatment group (three mice per group) were pooled together and depleted of mouse cells using an EasySep mouse/human chimera isolation kit (STEMCELL Technologies, no. 19849) before intravenous injection into secondary recipient mice (two secondary mice per group). For BM1043, because two of the four untreated mice and two of the three REPγδ-treated mice either had succumb to the disease or became moribund, BMs of the surviving mice at the point of harvest were separately transplanted into individual secondary mouse.
Single-cell immune profiling library preparation
CBγδ and REPγδ harvested from bulk cultures were first stained with anti-CD3 and anti-TCRγδ antibodies and purified by FACSAria III (BD Biosciences). The purified cells were then stained with a panel of TotalSeq-C antibodies (table S22) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and processed according to 10X Genomics’ standard workflow for Chromium Single Cell V(D)J with Feature Barcoding technology for Cell Surface Protein to generate the transcriptome (5′GEX) and featured barcode library. To generate the TCRγδ V(D)J library, a two-step target enrichment PCRs were adopted from the previously published protocol (59). Libraries were pooled and sequenced on NovaSeq 6000.
Statistical analysis
Sample sizes for various experimental analyses were indicated in the text descriptions in Results or figure legends. Three individual CB samples were used for day 14 single-cell profiling, with one of these also used for serial time-course (D0 and D7) analysis. Where applicable, mean and SEM were reported unless otherwise stated. Details of parameters used in the bioinformatics analysis are provided in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
Acknowledgments
Funding: This work was supported by the following research grants: American Society of Hematology (ASH) Global Research Award (C.J.E. and A.M.S.C.); Duke-NUS Medical School and the “Estate of Tan Sri Khoo Teck Puat” of Singapore Khoo Bridge Fund (A.M.S.C.); National Medical Research Council (NMRC) of Singapore, (i) Centre Grant NMRC/CG21APR2002 (T.K.H.L. and W.Y.K.H.), (ii) Large Collaborative Grant NMRC/OFLCG/003/2018 (W.Y.K.H., Y.T.G., and A.M.S.C.), and (iii) Open-Fund Individual Research Grant NMRC/OFIRG21NOV-0025 (A.M.S.C.); and National Health Innovation Centre Singapore Innovation to Develop grant NHIC-I2D-2108276 (A.M.S.C.).
Author contributions: Conceptualization: K.W.T. and A.M.S.C. Methodology: J.W.K.N., K.W.T., and A.M.S.C. Software: J.W.K.N. Validation: X.F., Z.P., T.H.L., A.S.T.L., and A.M.S.C. Formal analysis: J.W.K.N. and A.M.S.C. Investigation: K.W.T., D.Y.G., J.J.H.L., X.F., Z.P., T.H.L., A.S.T.L., and A.M.S.C. Resources: T.K.H.L., W.Y.K.H., S.L., C.J.E., Y.T.G., and A.M.S.C. Data curation: J.W.K.N. Visualization: J.W.K.N. and A.M.S.C. Funding acquisition: T.K.H.L., W.Y.K.H., C.J.E., Y.T.G., and A.M.S.C. Supervision: T.K.H.L., W.Y.K.H., S.L., C.J.E., Y.T.G., and A.M.S.C. Writing—original draft: J.W.K.N. and A.M.S.C. Writing—review and editing: J.W.K.N., K.W.T., S.L., X.F., and A.M.S.C.
Competing interests: K.W.T. is now employed by Tessa Therapeutics Ltd. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Raw single-cell data and codes used for analysis are deposited to Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE214289.
Supplementary Materials
This PDF file includes:
Supplementary Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S5
Tables S1 to S23
References
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.S. Mensurado, R. Blanco-Domínguez, B. Silva-Santos, The emerging roles of γδ T cells in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 20, 1–14 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.L. S. Lamb Jr., P. J. Henslee-Downey, R. S. Parrish, K. Godder, J. Thompson, C. Lee, A. P. Gee, Increased frequency of TCR gamma delta + T cells in disease-free survivors following T cell-depleted, partially mismatched, related donor bone marrow transplantation for leukemia. J. Hematother. 5, 503–509 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.K. T. Godder, P. J. Henslee-Downey, J. Mehta, B. S. Park, K. Y. Chiang, S. Abhyankar, L. S. Lamb, Long term disease-free survival in acute leukemia patients recovering with increased γδ T cells after partially mismatched related donor bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 39, 751–757 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.A. J. Gentles, A. M. Newman, C. L. Liu, S. V. Bratman, W. Feng, D. Kim, V. S. Nair, Y. Xu, A. Khuong, C. D. Hoang, M. Diehn, R. B. West, S. K. Plevritis, A. A. Alizadeh, The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nat. Med. 21, 938–945 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.E. Foord, L. C. M. Arruda, A. Gaballa, C. Klynning, M. Uhlin, Characterization of ascites- and tumor-infiltrating γδ T cells reveals distinct repertoires and a beneficial role in ovarian cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabb0192 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Y. Wu, D. Biswas, I. Usaite, M. Angelova, S. Boeing, T. Karasaki, S. Veeriah, J. Czyzewska-Khan, C. Morton, M. Joseph, S. Hessey, J. Reading, A. Georgiou, M. Al-Bakir; TRACERx Consortium, N. McGranahan, M. Jamal-Hanjani, A. Hackshaw, S. A. Quezada, A. C. Hayday, C. Swanton, A local human vδ1 T cell population is associated with survival in non small-cell lung cancer. Nat. Cancer 3, 696–709 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.A. Choudhary, F. Davodeau, A. Moreau, M. A. Peyrat, M. Bonneville, F. Jotereau, Selective lysis of autologous tumor cells by recurrent gamma delta tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from renal carcinoma. J. Immunol. 154, 3932–3940 (1995). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.E. Viey, G. Fromont, B. Escudier, Y. Morel, S. da Rocha, S. Chouaib, A. Caignard, Phosphostim-activated γδ T cells kill autologous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J. Immunol. 174, 1338–1347 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.M. Rigau, S. Ostrouska, T. S. Fulford, D. N. Johnson, K. Woods, Z. Ruan, H. E. G. McWilliam, C. Hudson, C. Tutuka, A. K. Wheatley, S. J. Kent, J. A. Villadangos, B. Pal, C. Kurts, J. Simmonds, M. Pelzing, A. D. Nash, A. Hammet, A. M. Verhagen, G. Vairo, E. Maraskovsky, C. Panousis, N. A. Gherardin, J. Cebon, D. I. Godfrey, A. Behren, A. P. Uldrich, Butyrophilin 2A1 is essential for phosphoantigen reactivity by γδ T cells. Science 367, eaay5516 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.M. M. Karunakaran, C. R. Willcox, M. Salim, D. Paletta, A. S. Fichtner, A. Noll, L. Starick, A. Nöhren, C. R. Begley, K. A. Berwick, R. A. G. Chaleil, V. Pitard, J. Déchanet-Merville, P. A. Bates, B. Kimmel, T. J. Knowles, V. Kunzmann, L. Walter, M. Jeeves, F. Mohammed, B. E. Willcox, T. Herrmann, Butyrophilin-2A1 directly binds germline-encoded regions of the vγ9vδ2 TCR and is essential for phosphoantigen sensing. Immunity 52, 487–498.e6 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.S. Vavassori, A. Kumar, G. S. Wan, G. S. Ramanjaneyulu, M. Cavallari, S. el Daker, T. Beddoe, A. Theodossis, N. K. Williams, E. Gostick, D. A. Price, D. U. Soudamini, K. K. Voon, M. Olivo, J. Rossjohn, L. Mori, G. de Libero, Butyrophilin 3A1 binds phosphorylated antigens and stimulates human γδ T cells. Nat. Immunol. 14, 908–916 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.A. Sandstrom, C. M. Peigné, A. Léger, J. E. Crooks, F. Konczak, M. C. Gesnel, R. Breathnach, M. Bonneville, E. Scotet, E. J. Adams, The intracellular B30.2 domain of butyrophilin 3A1 binds phosphoantigens to mediate activation of human vγ9vδ2 t cells. Immunity 40, 490–500 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Z. Sebestyen, I. Prinz, J. Déchanet-Merville, B. Silva-Santos, J. Kuball, Translating gammadelta (γδ) T cells and their receptors into cancer cell therapies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 169–184 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.P. L. Ryan, N. Sumaria, C. J. Holland, C. M. Bradford, N. Izotova, C. L. Grandjean, A. S. Jawad, L. A. Bergmeier, D. J. Pennington, Heterogeneous yet stable Vδ2+ T-cell profiles define distinct cytotoxic effector potentials in healthy human individuals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 14378–14383 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.K. M. Wragg, H. X. Tan, A. B. Kristensen, C. V. Nguyen-Robertson, A. D. Kelleher, M. S. Parsons, A. K. Wheatley, S. P. Berzins, D. G. Pellicci, S. J. Kent, J. A. Juno, High CD26 and low CD94 expression identifies an IL-23 responsive Vδ2+ T cell subset with a MAIT cell-like transcriptional profile. Cell Rep. 31, 107773 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.M. S. Davey, C. R. Willcox, S. P. Joyce, K. Ladell, S. A. Kasatskaya, J. E. McLaren, S. Hunter, M. Salim, F. Mohammed, D. A. Price, D. M. Chudakov, B. E. Willcox, Clonal selection in the human Vδ1 T cell repertoire indicates γδ TCR-dependent adaptive immune surveillance. Nat. Commun. 8, 14760 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.S. Ravens, C. Schultze-Florey, S. Raha, I. Sandrock, M. Drenker, L. Oberdörfer, A. Reinhardt, I. Ravens, M. Beck, R. Geffers, C. von Kaisenberg, M. Heuser, F. Thol, A. Ganser, R. Förster, C. Koenecke, I. Prinz, Human γδ T cells are quickly reconstituted after stem-cell transplantation and show adaptive clonal expansion in response to viral infection. Nat. Immunol. 18, 393–401 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.T. Dimova, M. Brouwer, F. Gosselin, J. Tassignon, O. Leo, C. Donner, A. Marchant, D. Vermijlen, Effector Vγ9Vδ2 T cells dominate the human fetal γδ T-cell repertoire. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, e556–e565 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.L. Tan, A. S. Fichtner, E. Bruni, I. Odak, I. Sandrock, A. Bubke, A. Borchers, C. Schultze-Florey, C. Koenecke, R. Förster, M. Jarek, C. von Kaisenberg, A. Schulz, X. Chu, B. Zhang, Y. Li, U. Panzer, C. F. Krebs, S. Ravens, I. Prinz, A fetal wave of human type 3 effector γδ cells with restricted TCR diversity persists into adulthood. Sci. Immunol. 6, eabf0125 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.J. P. H. Fisher, M. Yan, J. Heuijerjans, L. Carter, A. Abolhassani, J. Frosch, R. Wallace, B. Flutter, A. Capsomidis, M. Hubank, N. Klein, R. Callard, K. Gustafsson, J. Anderson, Neuroblastoma killing properties of Vδ2 and Vδ2-negative γδ T cells following expansion by artificial antigen-presenting cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 20, 5720–5732 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.D. C. Deniger, S. N. Maiti, T. Mi, K. C. Switzer, V. Ramachandran, L. V. Hurton, S. Ang, S. Olivares, B. A. Rabinovich, M. H. Huls, D. A. Lee, R. C. Bast Jr., R. E. Champlin, L. J. N. Cooper, Activating and propagating polyclonal gamma delta T cells with broad specificity for malignancies. Clin. Cancer Res. 20, 5708–5719 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.A. R. Almeida, D. V. Correia, A. Fernandes-Platzgummer, C. L. da Silva, M. G. da Silva, D. R. Anjos, B. Silva-Santos, Delta one T cells for immunotherapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Clinical-grade expansion/differentiation and preclinical proof of concept. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 5795–5804 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.G. M. Siegers, H. Dhamko, X.-H. Wang, A. M. Mathieson, Y. Kosaka, T. C. Felizardo, J. A. Medin, S. Tohda, J. Schueler, P. Fisch, A. Keating, Human Vδ1 γδ T cells expanded from peripheral blood exhibit specific cytotoxicity against B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia-derived cells. Cytotherapy 13, 753–764 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.D. V. Correia, M. Fogli, K. Hudspeth, M. G. da Silva, D. Mavilio, B. Silva-Santos, Differentiation of human peripheral blood Vδ 1+ T cells expressing the natural cytotoxicity receptor NKP30 for recognition of lymphoid leukemia cells. Blood 118, 992–1001 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.J. L. Nours, N. A. Gherardin, S. H. Ramarathinam, W. Awad, F. Wiede, B. S. Gully, Y. Khandokar, T. Praveena, J. M. Wubben, J. J. Sandow, A. I. Webb, A. von Borstel, M. T. Rice, S. J. Redmond, R. Seneviratna, M. L. Sandoval-Romero, S. Li, M. N. T. Souter, S. B. G. Eckle, A. J. Corbett, H. H. Reid, L. Liu, D. P. Fairlie, E. M. Giles, G. P. Westall, R. W. Tothill, M. S. Davey, R. Berry, T. Tiganis, J. M. Cluskey, D. G. Pellicci, A. W. Purcell, A. P. Uldrich, D. I. Godfrey, J. Rossjohn, A class of γδ T cell receptors recognize the underside of the antigen-presenting molecule MR1. Science 366, 1522–1527 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.A. M. Luoma, C. D. Castro, T. Mayassi, L. A. Bembinster, L. Bai, D. Picard, B. Anderson, L. Scharf, J. E. Kung, L. V. Sibener, P. B. Savage, B. Jabri, A. Bendelac, E. J. Adams, Crystal structure of Vδ1 T cell receptor in complex with CD1D-sulfatide shows MHC-like recognition of a self-lipid by human γδ T cells. Immunity 39, 1032–1042 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.J. P. H. Fisher, M. Yan, J. Heuijerjans, L. Carter, A. Abolhassani, J. Frosch, R. Wallace, B. Flutter, A. Capsomidis, M. Hubank, N. Klein, R. Callard, K. Gustafsson, J. Anderson, A simple and robust single-step method for CAR-Vδ1 γδ T cell expansion and transduction for cancer immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 13, 863155 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.S. C. De Rosa, J. P. Andrus, S. P. Perfetto, J. J. Mantovani, L. A. Herzenberg, L. A. Herzenberg, M. Roederer, Ontogeny of γδ T cells in humans. J. Immunol. 172, 1637–1645 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.M. Papadopoulou, T. Dimova, M. Shey, L. Briel, H. Veldtsman, N. Khomba, H. Africa, M. Steyn, W. A. Hanekom, T. J. Scriba, E. Nemes, D. Vermijlen, Fetal public Vγ9Vδ2 T cells expand and gain potent cytotoxic functions early after birth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 18638–18648 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.S. R. Riddell, K. S. Watanabe, J. M. Goodrich, C. R. Li, M. E. Agha, P. D. Greenberg, Restoration of viral immunity in immunodeficient humans by the adoptive transfer of T cell clones. Science 257, 238–241 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.M. E. Dudley, L. T. Ngo, J. Westwood, J. R. Wunderlich, S. A. Rosenberg, T-cell clones from melanoma patients immunized against an anchor-modified gp100 peptide display discordant effector phenotypes. Cancer J. 6, 69–77 (2000). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.M. S. Davey, C. R. Willcox, S. Hunter, S. A. Kasatskaya, E. B. M. Remmerswaal, M. Salim, F. Mohammed, F. J. Bemelman, D. M. Chudakov, Y. H. Oo, B. E. Willcox, The human Vδ2+ T-cell compartment comprises distinct innate-like Vγ9+ and adaptive Vγ9- subsets. Nat. Commun. 9, 1760 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.M. S. Davey, C. R. Willcox, A. T. Baker, S. Hunter, B. E. Willcox, Recasting human Vδ1 lymphocytes in an adaptive role. Trends Immunol. 39, 446–459 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.M. Gutierrez-Arcelus, N. Teslovich, A. R. Mola, R. B. Polidoro, A. Nathan, H. Kim, S. Hannes, K. Slowikowski, G. F. M. Watts, I. Korsunsky, M. B. Brenner, S. Raychaudhuri, P. J. Brennan, Lymphocyte innateness defined by transcriptional states reflects a balance between proliferation and effector functions. Nat. Commun. 10, 687 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.F. Davodeau, M. A. Peyrat, M. M. Hallet, J. Gaschet, I. Houde, R. Vivien, H. Vie, M. Bonneville, Close correlation between Daudi and mycobacterial antigen recognition by human gamma delta T cells and expression of V9JPC1 gamma/V2DJC delta-encoded T cell receptors. J. Immunol. 151, 1214–1223 (1993). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.P. S. Evans, P. J. Enders, C. Yin, T. J. Ruckwardt, M. Malkovsky, C. D. Pauza, In vitro stimulation with a non-peptidic alkylphosphate expands cells expressing Vgamma2-jgamma1.2/Vdelta2 T-cell receptors. Immunology 104, 19–27 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.S. Krishna, F. J. Lowery, A. R. Copeland, E. Bahadiroglu, R. Mukherjee, L. Jia, J. T. Anibal, A. Sachs, S. O. Adebola, D. Gurusamy, Z. Yu, V. Hill, J. J. Gartner, Y. F. Li, M. Parkhurst, B. Paria, P. Kvistborg, M. C. Kelly, S. L. Goff, G. Altan-Bonnet, P. F. Robbins, S. A. Rosenberg, Stem-like CD8 T cells mediate response of adoptive cell immunotherapy against human cancer. Science 370, 1328–1334 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.L. Gattinoni, E. Lugli, Y. Ji, Z. Pos, C. M. Paulos, M. F. Quigley, J. R. Almeida, E. Gostick, Z. Yu, C. Carpenito, E. Wang, D. C. Douek, D. A. Price, C. H. June, F. M. Marincola, M. Roederer, N. P. Restifo, A human memory T cell subset with stem cell–Like properties. Nat. Med. 17, 1290–1297 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.J. A. Shyer, R. A. Flavell, W. Bailis, Metabolic signaling in T cells. Cell Res. 30, 649–659 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.J. J. Melenhorst, G. M. Chen, M. Wang, D. L. Porter, C. Chen, M. K. A. Collins, P. Gao, S. Bandyopadhyay, H. Sun, Z. Zhao, S. Lundh, I. Pruteanu-Malinici, C. L. Nobles, S. Maji, N. V. Frey, S. I. Gill, A. W. Loren, L. Tian, I. Kulikovskaya, M. Gupta, D. E. Ambrose, M. M. Davis, J. A. Fraietta, J. L. Brogdon, R. M. Young, A. Chew, B. L. Levine, D. L. Siegel, C. Alanio, E. J. Wherry, F. D. Bushman, S. F. Lacey, K. Tan, C. H. June, Decade-long leukaemia remissions with persistence of CD4+ CAR T cells. Nature 602, 503–509 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.F. J. Lowery, S. Krishna, R. Yossef, N. B. Parikh, P. D. Chatani, N. Zacharakis, M. R. Parkhurst, N. Levin, S. Sindiri, A. Sachs, K. J. Hitscherich, Z. Yu, N. R. Vale, Y. C. Lu, Z. Zheng, L. Jia, J. J. Gartner, V. K. Hill, A. R. Copeland, S. K. Nah, R. V. Masi, B. Gasmi, S. Kivitz, B. C. Paria, M. Florentin, S. P. Kim, K. I. Hanada, Y. F. Li, L. T. Ngo, S. Ray, M. L. Shindorf, S. T. Levi, R. Shepherd, C. Toy, A. Y. Parikh, T. D. Prickett, M. C. Kelly, R. Beyer, S. L. Goff, J. C. Yang, P. F. Robbins, S. A. Rosenberg, Molecular signatures of antitumor neoantigen-reactive T cells from metastatic human cancers. Science 375, 877–884 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.C. R. Good, M. A. Aznar, S. Kuramitsu, P. Samareh, S. Agarwal, G. Donahue, K. Ishiyama, N. Wellhausen, A. K. Rennels, Y. Ma, L. Tian, S. Guedan, K. A. Alexander, Z. Zhang, P. C. Rommel, N. Singh, K. M. Glastad, M. W. Richardson, K. Watanabe, J. L. Tanyi, M. H. O’Hara, M. Ruella, S. F. Lacey, E. K. Moon, S. J. Schuster, S. M. Albelda, L. L. Lanier, R. M. Young, S. L. Berger, C. H. June, An NK-like CAR T cell transition in CAR T cell dysfunction. Cell 184, 6081–6100.e26 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.H. Li, A. M. van der Leun, I. Yofe, Y. Lubling, D. Gelbard-Solodkin, A. C. J. van Akkooi, M. van den Braber, E. A. Rozeman, J. B. A. G. Haanen, C. U. Blank, H. M. Horlings, E. David, Y. Baran, A. Bercovich, A. Lifshitz, T. N. Schumacher, A. Tanay, I. Amit, Dysfunctional CD8 T cells form a proliferative, dynamically regulated compartment within human melanoma. Cell 176, 775–789.e18 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.K. Hochheiser, F. Wiede, T. Wagner, D. Freestone, M. H. Enders, M. Olshansky, B. Russ, S. Nüssing, E. Bawden, A. Braun, A. Bachem, E. Gressier, R. McConville, S. L. Park, C. M. Jones, G. M. Davey, D. E. Gyorki, D. Tscharke, I. A. Parish, S. Turner, M. J. Herold, T. Tiganis, S. Bedoui, T. Gebhardt, Ptpn2 and Klrg1 regulate the generation and function of tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells in skin. J. Exp. Med. 218, e20200940 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.L. Parga-Vidal, F. M. Behr, N. A. M. Kragten, B. Nota, T. H. Wesselink, I. Kavazović, L. E. Covill, M. B. P. Schuller, Y. T. Bryceson, F. M. Wensveen, R. A. W. van Lier, T. J. P. van Dam, R. Stark, K. P. J. M. van Gisbergen, Hobit identifies tissue-resident memory T cell precursors that are regulated by Eomes. Sci. Immunol. 6, eabg3533 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.G. Pizzolato, H. Kaminski, M. Tosolini, D. M. Franchini, F. Pont, F. Martins, C. Valle, D. Labourdette, S. Cadot, A. Quillet-Mary, M. Poupot, C. Laurent, L. Ysebaert, S. Meraviglia, F. Dieli, P. Merville, P. Milpied, J. Déchanet-Merville, J. J. Fournié, Single-cell RNA sequencing unveils the shared and the distinct cytotoxic hallmarks of human TCRVδ1 and TCRVδ2 γδ T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 11906–11915 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.D. Wu, P. Wu, X. Wu, J. Ye, Z. Wang, S. Zhao, C. Ni, G. Hu, J. Xu, Y. Han, T. Zhang, F. Qiu, J. Yan, J. Huang, Ex vivo expanded human circulating Vδ1 γδT cells exhibit favorable therapeutic potential for colon cancer. Onco. Targets. Ther. 4, e992749 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.J. Saura-Esteller, M. de Jong, L. A. King, E. Ensing, B. Winograd, T. D. de Gruijl, P. W. H. I. Parren, H. J. van der Vliet, Gamma delta T-cell based cancer immunotherapy: Past-present-future. Front. Immunol. 13, 915837 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.L. Gattinoni, Acquisition of full effector function in vitro paradoxically impairs the in vivo antitumor efficacy of adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells. J. Clin. Investig. 115, 1616–1626 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.C. S. Hinrichs, Z. A. Borman, L. Cassard, L. Gattinoni, R. Spolski, Z. Yu, L. Sanchez-Perez, P. Muranski, S. J. Kern, C. Logun, D. C. Palmer, Y. Ji, R. N. Reger, W. J. Leonard, R. L. Danner, S. A. Rosenberg, N. P. Restifo, Adoptively transferred effector cells derived from naïve rather than central memory CD8+ T cells mediate superior antitumor immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 17469–17474 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.S. Ravens, A. S. Fichtner, M. Willers, D. Torkornoo, S. Pirr, J. Schöning, M. Deseke, I. Sandrock, A. Bubke, A. Wilharm, D. Dodoo, B. Egyir, K. L. Flanagan, L. Steinbrück, P. Dickinson, P. Ghazal, B. Adu, D. Viemann, I. Prinz, Microbial exposure drives polyclonal expansion of innate γδ T cells immediately after birth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 18649–18660 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.G. Sanchez Sanchez, M. Papadopoulou, A. Azouz, Y. Tafesse, A. Mishra, J. K. Y. Chan, Y. Fan, I. Verdebout, S. Porco, F. Libert, F. Ginhoux, B. Vandekerckhove, S. Goriely, D. Vermijlen, Identification of distinct functional thymic programming of fetal and pediatric human γδ thymocytes via single-cell analysis. Nat. Commun. 13, 5842 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.J. Lieberman, Granzyme A activates another way to die. Immunol. Rev. 235, 93–104 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.K. R. van Daalen, J. F. Reijneveld, N. Bovenschen, Modulation of inflammation by extracellular granzyme A. Front. Immunol. 11, 931 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.J. C. Ribot, N. Lopes, B. Silva-Santos, γδ T cells in tissue physiology and surveillance. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 221–232 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.M. Brandes, K. Willimann, B. Moser, Professional antigen-presentation function by human gammadelta T cells. Science 309, 264–268 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.M. Brandes, K. Willimann, G. Bioley, N. Lévy, M. Eberl, M. Luo, R. Tampé, F. Lévy, P. Romero, B. Moser, Cross-presenting human γδ T cells induce robust CD8+ αβ T cell responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 2307–2312 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.T. Metsalu, J. Vilo, ClustVis: A web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using principal component analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W566–W570 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.E. P. Mimitou, A. Cheng, A. Montalbano, S. Hao, M. Stoeckius, M. Legut, T. Roush, A. Herrera, E. Papalexi, Z. Ouyang, R. Satija, N. E. Sanjana, S. B. Koralov, P. Smibert, Multiplexed detection of proteins, transcriptomes, clonotypes and CRISPR perturbations in single cells. Nat. Methods 16, 409–412 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Y. Hao, S. Hao, E. Andersen-Nissen, W. M. Mauck III, S. Zheng, A. Butler, M. J. Lee, A. J. Wilk, C. Darby, M. Zager, P. Hoffman, M. Stoeckius, E. Papalexi, E. P. Mimitou, J. Jain, A. Srivastava, T. Stuart, L. M. Fleming, B. Yeung, A. J. Rogers, J. M. McElrath, C. A. Blish, R. Gottardo, P. Smibert, R. Satija, Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587.e29 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.X. Qiu, Q. Mao, Y. Tang, L. Wang, R. Chawla, H. A. Pliner, C. Trapnell, Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories. Nat. Methods 14, 979–982 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.K. Street, D. Risso, R. B. Fletcher, D. Das, J. Ngai, N. Yosef, E. Purdom, S. Dudoit, Slingshot: Cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genomics 19, 477 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S5
Tables S1 to S23
References





