Skip to main content
Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare logoLink to Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare
. 2023 May 3;6(2):70–72. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-22-19

Using FOCUS-PDSA Quality Improvement Methodology Model in Healthcare: Process and Outcomes

Yacoub Abuzied 1,, Sami Ayed Alshammary 2, Trad Alhalahlah 3, Shreemathie Somduth 1
PMCID: PMC10275632  PMID: 37333757

Learning Objectives

  1. Understand the concept of FOCUS-PDSA

  2. Know how FOCUS-PDSA is used for quality improvement and enhancement processes

  3. Learn the difference between FOCUS-PDSA and other frameworks or tools

FOCUS-PDSA PRINCIPLE AND CONCEPT

Quality is a prominent subject in healthcare, with the ultimate objective of maintaining a high level of patient satisfaction while increasing financial elements and patient safety.[1] The goals are always changing and may be influenced by a variety of external variables. When a healthcare institution encounters a barrier in meeting these objectives, it is critical to understand the root reasons and take the appropriate actions as soon as possible to accomplish the patient safety and cost-effectiveness objectives.[1,2] One quality improvement concept in healthcare is to do it right the first time, thus it is crucial to respond fast by focusing on the most critical elements that contributed to the problem at hand.[3] Instituting changes in healthcare organizations is difficult owing to the range of labor and duties. The organizations have been classified as a complex adaptive system, which is one of the most difficult systems to understand and manage because a single problem might be connected to several contributing parts at the same time.[4] As the need for high-quality patient care grows, many healthcare settings have started to monitor their performance to ensure that they are delivering treatment that is safe, effective, timely, patient centered, equitable, and efficient.[5]

FOCUS (F = Find a problem, O = Organize a team, C = Clarify the problem, U = Understand a problem, S = Select an intervention) and PDSA (P = Plan, D = Do, S = Study, A = Act) (FOCUS-PDSA) is a popular strategy that was established in the healthcare field to improve processes and quality.[6] It is a systematic process improvement strategy developed by the Hospital Corporation of America.[7] The methodology is simple to understand an apply to the management of any process (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

FOCUS-PDSA processes.

FOCUS and PDSA methodologies can be used to change how a service is delivered based on data collected in each stage or cycle.[8,9] This approach may also be used to assess the effectiveness of a change.[9] FOCUS is the sequence for identifying areas for improvement, whereas PDSA consists of cycles of improvement processes.[10] Each PDSA cycle tests a change through planning, implementation, studying outcomes, and acting on what is discovered. The FOCUS-PDSA model requires the formation of an interdisciplinary team and simple data collection and reporting tools.[11]

HOW IS FOCUS-PDSA USED FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT?

The first step in the FOCUS-PDSA methodology is to identify and characterize a specific process that needs to be improved or problem that needs to be solved. This process entails systematic, iterative testing of individual changes. FOCUS-PDSA is used for establishing high-quality standards and pursuing continual improvement and quality assurance.[12] This model for process improvement is essential for continuous improvement and typically gives strategies for quality improvement in healthcare. FOCUS-PDSA, also known as the trial-and-error cycle, encourages tiny modifications as well as quick adaptations and improvements.[13]

Another approach is the Kaizen method for continuous improvement, but this method is limited to specific quality measures over a short period of up to 6 months,[14] whereas FOCUS-PDSA is not limited to a specific period and is simple to implement.[15] FOCUS-PDSA makes changes step by step, little by little, thus facilitating continuous improvement of targeted activities or processes.

A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO PROBLEM SOLVING AND DATA ANALYSIS

The FOCUS-PDSA cycle provides a framework for discovering and objectively evaluating improvement possibilities by organizing processes and analyzing them based on each condition (Fig. 2). The FOCUS-PDSA model is used for various projects including the development of guidelines and protocols.[16] The following are two examples of articles in the literature that used FOCUS-PDSA or PDSA as quality improvement methodology.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Example of how to clarify the process. Reprinted from [17] with permission from Innovations Journals. LOS: length of stay.

The first example used FOCUS-PDSA to reduce the average length of stay (LOS) in an inpatient setting. The aim was to identify and manage reasons for delays in discharging patients from a medical specialties department at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. There were specific measurable targets per year. As a result, despite gradual increases in admissions from 2016 to 2018, the mean LOS decreased significantly between 2016 and 2018, from 9.16 to 7.47 days. Readmission and mortality rates decreased after the intervention was implemented in 2017, suggesting an improvement in the process of admission and discharge.[17]

The second example used PDSA cycles to enhance palliative care occupancy and efficiency in a setting that uses a healthcare pathway for service integration and policy development. This article described the experience in implementing a quality improvement project to overcome the problem of bed overcapacity at a comprehensive cancer center in a tertiary care center. The aim was to reduce the average LOS of palliative care patients as well as to increase cost-effectiveness. The PDSA cycle engaged all stakeholders from all service tiers, tested interventions in simplified pilots, and developed a detailed plan and business case for further implementation and rollout, which was then used to refine a process for implementing changes. As a result, a significant reduction in bed capacity was observed: from 35% in 2017 to 13.8% in 2018. The original LOS was 28 days, whereas the average LOS was 19 days in 2017 (including the time before and after the intervention), 10.8 days in 2018 (after the intervention was implemented), 10.1 days in 2019, and 16 days in 2020.[18]

SUMMARY

FOCUS-PDSA methodology is a helpful tool that can be used in various stages of quality improvement initiatives and serves several roles. Applying FOCUS-PDSA to projects in healthcare will save time, money, and effort. The availability of a wide range of quality tools, as well as improved participation of healthcare professionals and staff, will help to improve patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and develop a setting rich in quality elements and methodologies.

Funding Statement

Source of Support: None

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: None.

References

  • 1.Jazieh AR. Quality measures: types, selection, and application in health care quality improvement projects. Global J Qual Saf Healthcare . 2020;3:144–146. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-X6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tun S. Fulfilling a new obligation: teaching and learning of sustainable healthcare in the medical education curriculum. Med Teach . 2019;41:1168–1177. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1623870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Usak M, Kubiatko M, Shabbir MS, et al. Health care service delivery based on the Internet of things: a systematic and comprehensive study. Int J Commun Syst . 2020;33:e4179. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dooley KJ. A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci . 1997;1:69–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thomas Craig KJ, McKillop MM, Huang HT, et al. US hospital performance methodologies: a scoping review to identify opportunities for crossing the quality chasm. BMC Health Serv Res . 2020;20:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05503-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abuzied Y. A practical guide to the kaizen approach as a quality improvement tool. Global J Qual Saf Healthcare . 2022;5:79–81. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-22-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Costanza M, Lilly A, Lilly MP. Quality in the vascular laboratory. Noninvasive Vascular Diagnosis A Practical Textbook for Clinicians . Springer; 2022. 1–18.
  • 8.Christoff P. Running PDSA cycles. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care . 2018;48:198–201. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2018.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wakai T, Simasek M, Nakagawa U, et al. Screenings during well-child visits in primary care: a quality improvement study. J Am Board Fam Med . 2018;31:558–569. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.170222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vordenberg SE, Smith MA, Diez HL, et al. Using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) model for continuous quality improvement of an established simulated patient program. Innov Pharm . 2018;9:1. doi: 10.24926/iip.v9i2.989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gupta M. Making transfusion medicine a journey from good to great by using quality indicators and bringing in continuous quality improvement. Glob J Transfus Med . 2021;6:127. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Thakur V, Akerele OA, Lean Randell E. and Six Sigma as continuous quality improvement frameworks in the clinical diagnostic laboratory Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2022. 1–19. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Kumar V, Sharma R. Leadership styles and their relationship with TQM focus for Indian firms: an empirical investigation. Int J Prod Perform Manage . 2018;67:1063–1088. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Monden Y, Hamada K. Target costing and kaizen costing in Japanese automobile companies. J Manage Acc Res . 1991;3:16–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kauth MR, Sullivan G, Cully J, et al. Facilitating practice changes in mental health clinics: a guide for implementation development in health care systems. Psychol Serv . 2011;8:36. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Esmail R, Kirby A, Inkson T, et al. Quality improvement in the ICU: a Canadian perspective. J Crit Care . 2005;20:74–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Abuzied Y, Maymani H, AlMatouq B, et al. Reducing the length of stay by enhancing the patient discharge process: using quality improvement tools to optimize hospital efficiency. Global J Qual Saf Healthcare . 2021;4:44–49. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alshammary SA, Abuzied Y, Ratnapalan S. Enhancing palliative care occupancy and efficiency: a quality improvement project that uses a healthcare pathway for service integration and policy development. BMJ Open Qual . 2021;10:e001391. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare are provided here courtesy of Innovative Healthcare Institute

RESOURCES