Abstract
Immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease (ADDE) is required not only to improve the symptoms and signs but also to prevent further progression of the disease and its sight-threatening sequelae. This immunomodulation can be achieved through topical and/or systemic medications, and the choice of one drug over the other is determined by the underlying systemic disease. These immunosuppressive agents require a minimum of 6–8 weeks to achieve their beneficial effect, and during this time, the patient is usually placed on topical corticosteroids. Antimetabolites such as methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil, along with calcineurin inhibitors, are commonly used as first-line medications. The latter have a pivotal role in immunomodulation since T cells contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of ocular surface inflammation in dry eye disease. Alkylating agents are largely limited to controlling acute exacerbations with pulse doses of cyclophosphamide. Biologic agents, such as rituximab, are particularly useful in patients with refractory disease. Each group of drugs has its own side-effect profiles and requires a stringent monitoring schedule that must be followed to prevent systemic morbidity. A customized combination of topical and systemic medications is usually required to achieve adequate control, and this review aims to help the clinician choose the most appropriate modality and monitoring regimen for a given case of ADDE.
Keywords: Calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids, dry eye disease, immunosuppressive agents, mucous membrane pemphigoid, Sjogren’s syndrome, steroid-sparing agents
Dry eye disease (DED) can be classified as aqueous-deficient DED (ADDE) and evaporative DED.[1] Management of ADDE in the past was directed toward the mere replacement of the decreased tear production. However, the identification of different inflammatory pathways in the pathogenesis of ADDE has resulted in a drastic shift in the therapeutic protocols of ADDE.[2,3] The adoption of anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive therapy as the primary line of therapy for ADDE has opened up several potential avenues of therapeutic modalities for ADDE eyes as a wide range of systemic and topical medications are available for the same.
The choice of treatment can be challenging, and these medications are associated with significant side effects that require rigorous monitoring.[4] Furthermore, these drugs are not in the conventional armamentarium of an anterior segment ophthalmologist, and thus these factors may cause the clinician to refrain from prescribing them even when indicated. This review aims to provide an overview of the various groups of immunosuppressive medications available, their side-effect profiles, and indications in the context of the different etiologies of ADDE.
Causes of ADDE
The causes of ADDE can be classified as Sjogren’s syndrome (SS) (primary and secondary) and non-Sjogren’s ADDE.[2] Secondary SS is associated with other autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).[2,5] SS is associated with lymphocytic infiltration of the lacrimal and oral salivary glands resulting in the apoptosis of acinar and ductal epithelial cells, which progresses to glandular tissue fibrosis.[5] Non-Sjogren’s ADDE can be due to primary lacrimal gland deficiencies, obstruction of the lacrimal gland ducts, and reflex hyposecretion.[2] Primary lacrimal gland disorders are congenital and include alacrimia and congenital anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia.[2] Diseases like sarcoidosis can have a combined pathology which includes lacrimal gland involvement along with an impaired reflex arc.[6] Obstruction of the glandular ducts is seen with cicatrizing conjunctivitis (Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS), mucous membrane pemphigoid, drug-induced pemphigoid, and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)).[2,7] These entities have recently been classified as an ocular surface inflammatory disease in order to differentiate them from traditional age-related DED.[8] They can induce dry eye by affecting the goblet cells as well.[9,10]
Immunopathogenesis of DED
The underlying disease pathogenesis is variable with a diverse set of triggers and mediators involved. However, most of these processes converge and bring about their effects through common final pathways. There occurs an increase in inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes and mediators such as interleukin (IL) 1, IL 6, and tumor necrosis factor.[11,12] Recent studies have elaborated on the role of dysfunctional regulatory T cells, which fail to dampen self-activating T cells. Of these, Th 17 cells are more susceptible to this loss of T cell-mediated regulation.[13] As a result, it incites the activation of several inflammatory mediators which includes but is not limited to IL17.[13] This is also associated with a decrease in anti-inflammatory mediators such as lactoferrin.[11-13] This, in combination with increased osmolarity, can aggravate the inflammation within the ocular milieu.[14-16] An increased expression of cell surface adhesion molecules such as intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) ensues on the surface of both the corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells.[17-19] This binds to the lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1), resulting in the recruitment of lymphocytes and activation of several cascades of the inflammatory pathway.[17-19] A culmination of these factors results in goblet cell apoptosis, and direct damage to the lacrimal gland and to the tissue surrounding it.[20,21]
Immunosuppressive agents
Several groups of immunosuppressive agents are available, and this review will focus on the ones used most for DED. These medications are chosen based on their property to target the immune mediators discussed in the previous section to ensure an effective outcome with minimal collateral damage to healthy cells.
Corticosteroids
Mechanism of action
Corticosteroids have a dose-dependent mechanism of action with lower doses acting via intracellular receptors and higher doses mediating their actions through the transcellular receptors.[22-24] The former causes inactivation of the nuclear factor- kB, which in turn prevents transcription of proinflammatory cytokines like IL 1, IL 2, tumor necrosis factor, etc., while stimulating the production of anti-inflammatory mediators such as IL10 and lipocortin-1 [Fig. 1].[22-24] At higher doses, the corticosteroids induce a rapid effect and inhibit phospholipase A2 and cyclooxygenase enzymes. As a result, they prevent vasodilatation, migration, and activation of inflammatory cells. In conjunction with the anti-inflammatory activity, the corticosteroids mediate immunosuppression by decreasing B-cell humoral immunity and reduce the T-cell activation by inhibition of IL2.[25,26]
Figure 1.
Immunopathogenesis of aqueous-deficient dry eye disease with the mechanism of action of the commonly used anti-inflammatory agents. The color codes represent the specific factors which are inhibited by the respective drugs. Gray boxes indicate mediators which are not specifically inhibited by these agents. CXR: chemokine receptors, TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL: interleukin; JNK: c-Jun N-terminal kinase; ERK: extracellular signal-related kinase; APC: Antigen-presenting cells; MMP: matrix metalloproteinase; ICAM-1: intercellular adhesion molecule 1; IFN-γ: interferon gamma, MAP-Ks, mitogen-activated protein kinase
Available medications and dosage
Systemic corticosteroids: Several formulations are available which can be classified based on the duration of action into short acting (<12 h; hydrocortisone, cortisol), intermediate (12–36 h; prednisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone, triamcinolone), and long acting (>36 h; dexamethasone, betamethasone).[27,28] The potency is also proportional with shorter-acting formulations being the least potent. Oral prednisolone is started at a 1–1.5 mg/kg/day dose and given in a tapering fashion. The duration of the tapered dose depends upon the severity of the disease being managed. Patients requiring a maintenance dose are usually placed on 5–7.5 mg/day of prednisolone/prednisone. Steroids can also be given as a pulse dose (e.g. methylprednisolone 500–1000 mg) either just before any surgical intervention or to subdue any acute exacerbations.
Topical corticosteroids: Prednisolone acetate 1% is the most used medication within this category. Being a suspension, it has good penetration through the cornea.[29,30] Prednisolone sodium phosphate is a solution and does not have good diffusion into the aqueous.[29,30] Both topical dexamethasone and betamethasone are long-acting potent medications with moderate to poor permeation into the aqueous. Fluorometholone (0.1%, 0.25%) has a safer side effect profile and is preferred in eyes requiring long-term topical steroids.[28] Its acetate derivative is more potent than the fluorometholone alcohol.[28] Loteprednol etabonate (0.2%, 0.5%) is the only ester-based topical molecule and is converted to inactive products within the cornea due to this property.[22,28] Its intraocular penetration is low leading to lesser adverse effects. Other topical corticosteroids that are available are clobetasone butyrate 0.1% and difluprednate 0.05%.[28]
Adverse effects
The most common side effects of topical corticosteroids are ocular hypertension and secondary glaucoma.[22,28] The incidence of these findings is dose dependent and is higher with more potent, nonester molecules and in eyes with chronic exposure to steroids.[22] While the ocular hypertension is transient and resolves with the discontinuation of the steroids, the optic nerve damage is irreversible. Reactivation of corneal herpetic infections can also occur with the use of topical steroids.[28] Posterior subcapsular cataracts are a frequent complication of both topical and systemic corticosteroids.[4,28] Central serous chorioretinopathy is also associated with systemic steroid use.[28] Other side effects of systemic corticosteroids include gastritis, impaired wound healing, purpura, osteoporosis, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and myopathy.[22]
Monitoring
Screening for risk factors for secondary glaucoma such as diabetes mellitus, high myopia, and family history of glaucoma is recommended. Subsequently, they should undergo regular intraocular pressure checks and optic disc assessment.[28] Prior to instituting systemic steroids, a baseline body weight, blood pressure (BP) measurement, lipid, and glycemic profile should be obtained [Table 1].[22] If a maintenance dose of steroids is anticipated, then a baseline bone mineral density scan is required. This scan is repeated after 1 year of steroids—if a decrease is noted, then the scan is repeated annually. If the scan is normal, then it is carried out every 2–3 years.[22] Ruling out systemic infections such as tuberculosis, syphilis, and obtaining a viral serology is recommended prior to starting oral steroids. Other parameters that require monitoring have been detailed in Table 1. Patients are also placed on oral calcium (500 mg/day) and vitamin D (500–1000 IU/day) to reduce the risk of osteoporosis.
Table 1.
Doses, adverse effects, and monitoring protocols of different groups of immunosuppressive agents
| Drug | Dose | Adverse effects | Monitoring | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
| Loading | Maintenance | Baseline | Follow up | ||
| Corticosteroids Prednisolone | 1-1.5mg/kg/day Pulse dose: 500mg stat (intravenous) | 5-7.5mg/day | Ocular hypertension , glaucoma osteoporosis, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus | Screening for risk factors for glaucoma Body weight, blood pressure measurement, lipid and glycemic profile Rule out tuberculosis, syphilis and other systemic infections | Regular intraocular pressure and optic disc assessment Bone mineral density repeated after 1 year: if decreased is noted-repeat annually. If normal: repeat every 2-3 years Adults >65 years : Lateral spine X rays Blood glucose profile: every 3–6 months for the first year; Annually after that check. Lipid profile: every 6-12 months |
|
T cell inhibitors Cyclosporine Tacrolimus |
2.5-5 mg/kg/day in two divided doses 0.05-0.1mg/kg/day |
Gradually decreased to 0.5mg/kg/day. | Common to both drugs: Renal dysfunction, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, infection, hyperuricemia and gout Cyclosporine: hirsutism and gum hyperplasia Tacrolimus: alopecia, gastric intolerance and hyperglycemia |
Blood pressure Renal and liver function tests Glycemic profile Serum electrolytes Uric acid Rule out tuberculosis, syphilis and other systemic infections | Same tests as baseline repeated every 2-3 months Tacrolimus: therapeutic drug monitoring |
|
Antimetabolites Methotrexate Azathioprine Mycophenolate mofetil |
7.5-10mg/once a week. increased by 2.5mg + Folic acid 1mg x5 days or 5mg x1 day 2-3 mg/kg/day given in two divided doses, increased by 0.5 mg/kg/day 2g/day (2 divided doses) for 6 months |
Decreased by 2.5-5mg/week until maintenance dose Reduced by 0.5 mg/kg every month 0.5-3 g/day. |
Hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal intolerance, increased infection risk, aplastic anemia and photosensitivity. Gastrointestinal intolerance, Myelosuppression, hypersensitivity, hepatotoxicity, infections. Gastric intolerance and myelosuppression. | Common to all drugs: Complete blood count (CBC), Renal function test (RFT), Liver function test (LFT) Viral serology (hepatitis B and C) Rule out tuberculosis and syphilis, and pregnancy. Thiopurine methyltransferase levels before starting azathioprine |
Weekly CBC, LFT and RFT x1 month. Repeated every 2-3 months CBC, LFT: repeated every 1-2 weeks until the maintenance dose is achieved Thereafter: every three monthly CBC: every week x1 month, two weekly x 2 months, monthly check. Regular RFT and LFT check |
| Alkylating agents Cyclophosphamide | Pulse dose 10-15 mg/kg (500-750mg) (intravenous) 1-3 mg/kg/day (intake of fluids is encouraged) | 1-3 mg/kg/day | Hemorrhagic cystitis, myelosuppression, sterility, nausea, vomiting, secondary malignancies, and alopecia | Complete blood count with differential and urine analysis Fertility counselling Rule out systemic infections | Repeat CBC and urine analysis every month |
T-cell inhibitors (cyclosporine and tacrolimus)
Mechanism of action
Calcineurin inhibitors prevent the self-activation of T cells via IL 2 [Fig. 1].[4,31] These drugs bind to immunophilins within the T-cell cytoplasm. Cyclosporine binds to cyclophilin, while tacrolimus binds to FK binding protein.[32] These complexes then competitively inhibit calcineurin activity, and as a result, transcription of several cytokines genes is prevented. One of these is the IL2 gene which is required for T-cell activation and proliferation. This effect is exerted on the T-helper, T suppressor, and T cytotoxic cells. Thus, these medications mediate immunosuppression by blocking T cell activity.
Available medications and dosage
Cyclosporine and tacrolimus are the most frequently used topical and systemic drugs within this group. Other formulations that are available include pimecrolimus and voclosporin. Oral cyclosporine is given in two divided doses with an initial dose of 2.5–5 mg/kg/day. Once the inflammation is under control, the dose can be gradually decreased to 0.5 mg/kg/day. Topical cyclosporine is available as 0.05% and 0.1% eye drop preparations and is administered twice a day.[4] Higher concentrations of cyclosporine can be prepared from the injectable medication (1% cyclosporine) and the oral one (2%), by compounding with artificial tears or sterile oil.[33] The primary concern with topical cyclosporine is its hydrophobic nature, which prevents adequate penetration through the precorneal tear film. Both a cationic and an anionic formulation are available as an emulsion and have low ocular bioavailability.[34,35] To circumvent these issues an aqueous nanomicellar preparation (0.09%) has been devised with the cyclosporine molecules encapsulated within a hydrophobic core. This is surrounded by a hydrophilic capsule which delivers a higher concentration of this drug both in the cornea and conjunctiva.[36-38]
Oral tacrolimus is available as an immediate-release and an extended-release formulation. It is given as a 0.05–0.1 mg/kg/day dose in two divided doses, which are 12 h apart[4] Topical tacrolimus is available as 0.02–0.03% ointment and 0.005-0.1% solutions/suspension, which is given as a twice a day or a once nighttime dose.[39] Similar to cyclosporine the hydrophobic nature of the drug prevents its deeper penetration. The use of nano-formulations and liposomes has been explored to circumvent this issue.[40,41]
Monitoring
Patients who are on calcineurin inhibitors (CI) require monitoring of BP, renal, and hepatic functions along with serum electrolytes and glucose [Table 1].[42] Ruling out systemic infections is essential before starting these medications. Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic range and requires therapeutic drug monitoring.
Adverse effects
Both cyclosporine and tacrolimus can cause renal dysfunction, which can resolve by decreasing the dose of the medication. However, irreversible damage to the renal cells can also occur with chronic use of the medications.[43,44] Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia, and gout can ensue with long-term use of these medications.[43,45,46] While chronic use of cyclosporine can result in hirsutism and gum hyperplasia, tacrolimus use is associated with alopecia, gastric intolerance, and hyperglycemia.[47-49] Tacrolimus has a diabetogenic potential as a result of direct toxicity to the β-cells and via inhibition of the transcription of the insulin gene.[50] This can result in hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and paraesthesia. Other rare complications also include neurotoxicity, lymphoproliferative disorders, squamous cell cancers, and systemic infections.[32,51] Topical side effects include ocular discomfort and blurring of vision.[39,52]
Alkylating agents
Mechanism of action
Several drugs such as chlorambucil, ifosfamide, melphalan, and procarbazine are included in the category. Since cyclophosphamide is used frequently in the context of DED, this drug will be discussed in this section. This nitrogen mustard inhibits protein synthesis by preventing RNA transcription from DNA by alkylating the DNA molecules.[53,54] In addition to this antimitotic action, the agent also has immunomodulatory effect which is T-cell specific. Since the medication is not cell cycle specific, it exerts its effect on resting and dividing cells.[4] As a result, the toxicity associated with cyclophosphamide is significant, limiting its use in ocular surface diseases to pulse doses.
Dosage
Intravenous cyclophosphamide is infused as a pulse dose of 10–15 mg/kg, which can be repeated 2–3 times, depending upon the disease severity.[53] The oral form of cyclophosphamide is given in the morning (1–3 mg/kg/day) and patients are advised to consume adequate fluids in order to prevent urinary bladder toxicity.
Adverse effects and Monitoring
The two most common side effects of cyclophosphamide include hemorrhagic cystitis and myelosuppression.[55,56] The former is also associated with other features of urinary tract toxicity such as frequency and urgency. This occurs because of acrolein, which is one of the metabolites of cyclophosphamide. Intake of adequate fluids to decrease the contact time of acrolein with the urinary system has been recommended.[55] Other side effects include amenorrhea, sterility, nausea, vomiting, and alopecia.[55,56] A complete blood count (CBC) and urine analysis is recommended prior to starting the medication and requires monthly repetition when on therapy. Since cyclophosphamide can affect male fertility, young patients receiving this medication should be counseled appropriately and referred to sperm banks, cryopreservation centers, and fertility specialists to explore these preserving options before commencing therapy.[57] These patients are also at an increased risk of developing secondary malignancies, such as bladder cancer, acute leukemias, lymphomas, and thyroid cancer, and a thorough age-appropriate screening is recommended.
Antimetabolites
Mechanism of action
These medications act by inhibiting the replication of DNA and RNA, which ultimately interferes with cellular metabolism [Fig. 1].[58] There are four groups of drugs under this category, and each group has a unique mechanism of action. These include folate antagonists, cytidine analogues, purine analogues, and pyrimidine analogues. Of these, folate antagonists, purine, and pyrimidine analogues are the most used in ophthalmology.
Purine analogues get converted into active metabolites which then get integrated with DNA strands and stop further synthesis.[59] Azathioprine is one such example that gets converted to 6-mercaptopurine within the liver.
Folate antagonists (methotrexate) mediate their action by preventing the formation of tetrahydrofolate and the subsequent DNA and RNA synthesis.[60] This effect is facilitated by the inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase. An additional effect is its anti-inflammatory action which occurs due to the accumulation of adenosine.[61] This results in a decreased activation and proliferation of both cellular and humoral immunity mediators.[61]
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was designed to specially target lymphocytes and their cytokines.[62] This drug impedes the action of inosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase. Its specificity is facilitated by the fact that its inhibition of the type II isoform is more potent than that of the type I isoform.[62] The former is present in T and B cells, while the latter is more ubiquitously present and, thus the cytotoxic effect is exerted only on the lymphocytic cells.
Available medications and dosage
Azathioprine is given as a once daily dose of 2–3 mg/kg/day.[63] It can be started as 1 mg/kg/day in two divided doses which is slowly increased by 0.5 mg/kg/day every 6–8 weeks until the inflammation is under control. A reversal of the process is followed by reducing the dose by 0.5 mg/kg every month until the maintenance dose has been attained. This is defined as the lowest dose at which the quiescence is maintained.
Methotrexate is given as a weekly dose and is usually started at 7.5–10 mg.[64] This can be increased by 2.5 mg until the desired effect is seen, and subsequently, in a manner similar to that of azathioprine, the dose is decreased to a maintenance level. The maximum therapeutic dose is 25 mg/week.[65] Concurrent daily administration of folic acid is also required to protect normal cells from the effects of methotrexate.[66] This is administered as a 1 mg/day dose on all days other than the day when methotrexate is given or a single 5 mg dose.[67] Methotrexate can be given by a subcutaneous or intramuscular route and this has a higher bioavailability along with decreased gastric and hepatic adverse effects.[68-70]
Mycophenolic acid is available in two formulations which include MMF and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium. Oral MMF is given as 2 g/day dose for 6 months and then replaced with a maintenance dose of 0.5–3 g/day.[71,72] The maximum dose that can be administered per day is 3 g.[73] The enteric-coated tablet has a lower dose.
Monitoring
Prior to starting antimetabolites, a baseline CBC, renal function test (RFT), and liver function test (LFT) are procured. Obtaining a viral serology (hepatitis B and C) and ruling out tuberculosis and syphilis are also recommended. In women, it is essential to rule out pregnancy.[4,43] A comprehensive diagnostic metabolic panel is also recommended.
For azathioprine, the CBC is repeated every 1–2 weeks until the maintenance dose is achieved, after which it is repeated every 3 months.[74] LFT is also repeated at the same interval. Thiopurine methyltransferase is an enzyme that converts azathioprine to inactive metabolites. Its reduced activity results in an increased concentration of 6-mercaptopurine and its associated side effects.[75] Thus, checking its levels is also advocated prior to starting azathioprine.
Once methotrexate has been initiated, weekly CBC, LFT, and RFT are required for the initial month. Subsequently, these tests are repeated every 2–3 months.
CBC is obtained every week for a month when starting MMF and is then done every two weeks for 2 months, followed by a monthly check.[76] Regular assessment of RFT and LFT is also recommended.
Adverse effects
The most common side effect associated with use of azathioprine is myelosuppression. Others include gastric intolerance, hypersensitivity, hepatotoxicity, and an increased risk of infections. It can rarely cause macrocytic anemia, myalgia, lymphoma, skin cancer, and alopecia.[77] The concurrent use of allopurinol has to be avoided as it can increase the risk of myelosuppression.[78]
Methotrexate use is associated with hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal intolerance.[79] Other side effects include alopecia, increased infection risk, leucopenia, aplastic anemia, and cutaneous photosensitivity.
MMF is associated with hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia, and myelosuppression.[80,81] Gastric intolerance is common and the risk of the same is reduced by using enteric-coated tablets.[80,81]
Other agents
Lifitegrast
This molecule blocks the binding of the lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) antagonist to ICAM-1.[82] As a result, it prevents the migration of antigen-presenting cells to the nearby lymph nodes, which in turn prevents the activation of T cells residing within it.[82] Additionally, it also blocks the migration of the activated T cells and, thus, halts the ensuing ocular surface damage that these cells could have caused.[82,83] It can also directly decrease the production of interferon-γ, IL 1, and IL 10.[84] The use of this drug is associated with mild ocular discomfort, stinging, and dysgeusia.[19] Several studies have shown that lifitegrast can reduce corneal staining and improve subjective scores in eyes with ADDE.[85-87] In contrast to CI, the onset of action is faster with effects seen as early as 14 days.[88]
Repository corticotropin injection (RCI)
RCI (Acthar® Gel; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Hampton, NJ, USA) is a combination of pituitary peptides and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), which is injected subcutaneously (twice weekly).[89,90] This induces endogenous cortisol production which dampens the inflammatory activity.[89] It also has nonsteroidogenic mechanisms of action, which are exerted by directly inhibiting the activity of inflammatory mediators such as T cells, B cells, and immunoglobulins.[89-91] This novel agent has shown the reduction of ocular surface staining and improvement in patient symptomatology scores, which typically occurred after three months of use of the agent.[89,92] This improvement was also noted in eyes that did not respond to traditional immunosuppressive therapy.[92] Future studies that compare this therapy with conventional immunomodulators will help understand its potential in treating DED.
Trehalose
Trehalose is a disaccharide that acts primarily by preventing protein denaturation in the absence of water.[93] Its anti-inflammatory property is secondary to its ability to activate transcription factor EB.[94-96] This induces autophagosome activity which causes the breakdown of the inflammatory cells.[94-96] Furthermore, it decreases levels of cytokines, especially TNF-α, IL 1, and IL 6.[93] Clinically, these effects translate to a thicker tear film and decreased staining of the ocular surface.[95] Improvement of goblet cell density has also been reported with the topical use of trehalose.[97]
Hydroxychloroquine
Hydroxychloroquine exerts its anti-inflammatory effect by blocking the toll-like receptors.[98,99] Its use has been described primarily for SS. Although a few reports have described a decrease in the serum levels of inflammatory mediators with the betterment of the objective symptomatic and surface staining scores, randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate an improvement in corneal or conjunctival scores.[98-102] The efficacy of this medication is perhaps limited to a specific subset of cases, and further studies which can identify biomarkers which are predictive of the same can help employ hydroxychloroquine in DED management.[103]
Biologic agents
These medications include TNF-α inhibitors, lymphocyte inhibitors, and specific receptor inhibitors.[4,104] TNF-α inhibitors act by blocking the binding of TNF-α and preventing the release of a proinflammatory cascade.[105] Lymphocyte inhibitors target T cells (abatacept) and B cells (rituximab and belimumab).[106] Of these, rituximab is used most commonly in ADDE and is a chimeric antibody. It acts directly by binding to the CD 20 positive cells and inducing cell death.[107] Indirect mechanisms have also been described and can occur via complement and antibody-mediated cytotoxicity.[107] It is administered as a 1 g dose which is repeated after 2 weeks. Since its infusion is associated with reactions, administration of prior antihistamines and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is recommended.
Omega fatty acids
These typically are the omega-3 fatty acids, and when they are metabolized, they give rise to resolvins, lipoxins, and protectins.[108-110] These metabolites help decrease cytokine levels and protect corneal cells as well. Both topical and oral supplementation has been described to counter ADDE inflammation. Although the evidence in literature is variable regarding their efficacy, a large majority have supported the claim that these essential fatty acids improve the health of the ocular surface while decreasing the staining of the cornea and conjunctiva.[108-110] Furthermore, these medications are extremely safe and, hence, have been incorporated into standardized treatment regimens.[108,111]
Immunoglobulins
Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) are reconstituted from the pooled plasma of several thousands of donors.[112] The anti-inflammatory effect of IVIg is achieved at a higher dose than that used for immune deficiencies.[112] This effect is mediated by inhibiting migration of inflammatory cells, complement inactivation, T and B cell blockade, and is typically given at a dose of 2–3 g/kg/month over 3 days.[112,113] IVIg has a relatively safe profile and is associated with headaches following infusion along with allergic cutaneous reactions.[112] They can very rarely cause acute renal failure, anaphylactic shock, and thromboembolic events.[112]
Approach to immunosuppression in DED
A stepwise guide to choosing the most appropriate modality of immunosuppression has been provided below based on the type of ADDE present in the patient [Table 2].
Table 2.
Approach to immunosuppression in different etiologies of aqueous-deficient dry eye disease
| Drug | Topical therapy | Systemic therapy | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Indication | Course of therapy | Drug of choice | |||
| Sjogren- associated ADDE | Primary Sjogren’s Syndrome | Surface inflammation | Tapering course of topical steroids followed by calcineurin inhibitors | Loteprednol/fluorometholone Tacrolimus Cyclosporine | Not indicated for ocular involvement in isolation |
| Significant corneal and conjunctival staining | Calcineurin inhibitors | ||||
| Secondary Sjogren’s syndrome | Surface inflammation | Tapering course of topical steroids followed by calcineurin inhibitors | Loteprednol/fluorometholone Tacrolimus Cyclosporine | Choice of therapy is dictated by the underlying autoimmune disorder | |
| Significant corneal and conjunctival staining | Calcineurin inhibitors | ||||
| Non-Sjogren ADDE | Stevens-Johnson Syndrome | Persistent conjunctival inflammation not corrected by addressing local pathologies | Tapering course of topical steroids followed by calcineurin inhibitors | Loteprednol/fluorometholone Tacrolimus Cyclosporine | Methotrexate/azathioprine/and mycophenolate mofetil |
| Mucous membrane pemphigoid | Acute exacerbation | Tapering course of topical steroids | Prednisolone acetate | Step-ladder approach Mild disease: Dapsone Moderate disease: Tapering dose of oral corticosteroids along with oral methotrexate/azathioprine/mycophenolate mofetil Severe/acute exacerbation: IV methyl prednisolone±cyclophosphamide pulse dose along with systemic therapy as per moderate disease Refractory disease: biologics (rituximab) ±intravenous immunoglobulins | |
| Graft-versus-Host disease | Significant corneal and conjunctival staining or hyperemia | Tapering course of topical steroids followed by calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and cyclosporine) | Loteprednol/fluorometholone Tacrolimus Cyclosporine | Given in conjunction with the hematologist/oncologist Oral corticosteroids combined with calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, or biological agents | |
Sjogren’s syndrome
Primary Sjogren’s syndrome
In eyes with active surface inflammation, the first choice of therapy is with topical corticosteroids [Figs. 1 and 2].[4] Depending upon the severity, either loteprednol or prednisolone acetate can be given in a tapering fashion.[4] Since these cases also require maintenance therapy, topical immunomodulators such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus are also indicated. Cyclosporine can help improve symptoms and ocular staining scores, the tear film break-up time, and the Schirmer values [Fig. 2].[52,114] These effects of cyclosporine may require several months to manifest, and faster results have been obtained with the use of the nano-micellar preparations where the results are seen within 1 month of usage.[36,114,115] Cyclosporine can also address the neurotrophic component by improving the corneal sensations which are typically reduced in ADDE.[116] An increase in tear production has also been reported, which is greater with the 0.09% formulation.[36,37]
Figure 2.
Response to systemic immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease. A case of undiagnosed primary Sjogren’s syndrome with corneal epithelial defect (A1) responded to systemic hydroxychloroquine and azathioprine (A2). Two cases of mucous membrane pemphigoid presented with severe dry eye (B1, C1), underwent conjunctival biopsy for the confirmation of the diagnosis and responded remarkably to oral mycophenolate mofetil with the resolution of the corneal epitheliopathy (B2, C2)
Topical tacrolimus has also been used for the control of ocular inflammation in primary SS.[117,118] Tacrolimus use can bring about changes in the ocular surface staining within 1 month of use, while parameters such as Schirmer’s and tear film break up time can take up to 3 months to stabilize.[117-119] Furthermore, both CI can also improve the goblet cell density and have a protective effect on lacrimal glandular cells, which provides an added benefit over topical corticosteroids.[117,120,121] Both CI are employed for moderate to severe dry eye and have shown good tolerance rates for up to 12 months of use, even in eyes with severe ADDE.[34,117,122,123] Although no period of therapy has been defined for the use of CI, persistent decreases in ocular staining scores have been reported with long-term usage, which persevered despite discontinuation of medications.[124] These effects were particularly seen in eyes, which had received these medications for at least 1 year.
Systemic immunosuppressants for ADDE in isolation are typically not required and are indicated in the presence of extra-glandular involvement such as arthritis or dermatological manifestations. This requires a referral to the rheumatologist for the initiation of immunosuppression. Several recent studies have shown mixed results of biologic agents such as rituximab in patients with primary SS.[106,125] Similarly, TNF-α inhibitors are not preferred in primary SS because of the higher risk of lymphoproliferative disorders following their use.[106,126]
Secondary Sjogren’s syndrome
Here, the dose and modality of immunosuppression are determined by the autoimmune disorder causing the ADDE. The approach to immunosuppression in patients with RA is complex and depends upon the duration of the disease (greater than or less than 6 months) and the severity at presentation. The patients are usually started on a monotherapy of methotrexate, which is then escalated to a combination therapy with either another disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (leflunomide/hydroxychloroquine) or with a biologic agent (rituximab).[65,127] Usually, these medications require 6–12 weeks for their effects to peak and oral corticosteroids are given during this period.[4] A similar graded approach is used for the management of SLE with low-dose steroids for mild disease which is not life or organ threatening. Immunomodulators such as MMF, CI, and biologic agents are administered when the disease is severe.[128] The therapy in such cases is typically handled by the immunologist or a rheumatologist with an active input from the ophthalmologist to tailor the degree of immunosuppression.
Topical immunosuppression in secondary Sjogren’s is carried out in a similar manner to primary Sjogren’s disease with CI being the mainstay of therapy [Fig. 3]. The patients can also have ocular exacerbations, which require immediate immunosuppression. These can manifest as corneal thinning or perforation, and a detailed ocular exam is warranted to ascribe them to an immune-mediated or a dry-eye-mediated process. In case of a peripheral ulcerative keratitis like presentation, an underlying inflammatory process is more likely, whereas cases with a central melt with surrounding unhealthy epithelium are more likely to be secondary to an aqueous-deficient activity. Similarly, in the presence of associated scleritis, an autoimmune pathology is considered. These conditions warrant an immediate increase in systemic immunomodulators and can often also require pulse doses of systemic immunosuppressants. The presence of systemic vasculitic activity such as acute renal failure or pneumonitis should be looked out for if an autoimmune disorder is suspected. A complete autoimmune panel with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and appropriate histopathological workup can help cinch the diagnosis of the underlying condition. Additionally, cases with DED are predisposed to develop cataract and require a good pre and perioperative control of the underlying inflammation for the same.[129]
Figure 3.
Response to systemic immunosuppression in a case of aqueous-deficient dry eye recalcitrant to topical medications. A 13-year-old child with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and secondary Sjogren’s syndrome presented with severe bilateral dry eyes (A1,B1) with upper forniceal scarring and keratinization (C1 and D1) in the left eye. The child was on half-hourly lubricants and cyclosporine, and improved dramatically with the reduction of the corneal staining (A2, B2) and conjunctival keratinization (C2,D2) after using systemic hydroxychloroquine and steroids
Non-Sjogren’s ADDE
Of the several causes of non-Sjogren’s ADDE, a select few require immunosuppression to arrest the inflammation and prevent sequelae such as cicatrizing conjunctivitis and limbal stem cell deficiency. Its role in ADDE is to halt the peri-ductal and glandular fibrosis, which can worsen the dry eye component.
Mucous membrane pemphigoid
A stepwise approach has been described for the management of this cicatricial disorder.[4] Dapsone is the first line of management in these cases, and in eyes where the inflammation is not sufficiently controlled with the same, either methotrexate, azathioprine, or MMF is added [Fig. 2].[4,130] In eyes which present with severe disease or have acute manifestations such as corneal perforations and melt require immediate immunosuppression with intravenous methylprednisolone which can be combined with intravenous cyclophosphamide.[4,131] In eyes with refractory disease, a trial of biological agents such as rituximab, etanercept, and infliximab can be given.[132,133] The efficacy of rituximab has been described in isolation and in combination with IVIg. It is effective not only in refractory disease but can also induce remission in advanced cases as well.[132,134,135] Although the expense can be inhibitory, the overall side effect profile is very favorable, especially when compared to cyclophosphamide, and thus this medication has become a frontrunner in the management of this challenging ocular disorder.
Stevens–Johnson syndrome
Ophthalmologists are mostly involved in the management of the chronic ocular sequelae of SJS. Ocular inflammation in the chronic phase is usually secondary to local causes such as distichiatic lashes or lid margin keratinization.[136] However, this inflammation can also occur in isolation and requires control to prevent damage to the residual stem cells and the lacrimal gland.[137,138] Additionally, an inflamed ocular surface can persist despite adequate management of the lid margin keratinization and ADDE. In such cases, topical and/or systemic immunosuppression is warranted. The most commonly used medications include methotrexate, azathioprine, and MMF for systemic immunosuppression, while topical immunosuppression is usually managed with steroids and CI.[137,139,140] Unlike Sjogren’s disease where an active autoimmune disorder is present, the immune dysregulation of SJS is a one-time event. Thus, isolated immune-mediated melts are extremely rare, and if present, a complete systemic workup is indicated to rule out an underlying connective tissue disorder.
Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Ocular GvHD occurs as the inflammatory cascade activated by the donor T cells, which results in dry eye secondary to glandular fibrosis and decreased goblet cell density.[141] The use of topical CI such as tacrolimus has been shown to improve the patient comfort, surface staining scores, and objective parameters such as Schirmer’s test and the tear film break-up time.[35,142-145] Other medications that have been used for chronic ocular GvHD include topical anakinra and tranilast, both of which improve dry-eye-related ocular surface disease.[141] Janus kinase inhibitors have also been used both topically and systemically in chronic GvHD and can be considered as alternatives to corticosteroids for the control of inflammation.[146-148] In the presence of systemic features of chronic GvHD, the patients are placed on systemic immunosuppression with CI, MMF, and biological agents such as rituximab.[149-151] If chronic ocular GvHD is present in isolation, systemic immunosuppression is warranted and can be instituted in conjunction with hematologist and oncologist.[152]
Future Perspectives
The search for newer molecules that can effectively address inflammation in ADDE is ceaseless and the number of novel therapeutic agents being devised for the same is endless. An ideal molecule would target and mitigate specific inflammatory mediators without affecting normal healthy cells. These molecules would be specific to a particular disease, have minimal side effects, and an easy dosing schedule. Certain avenues that are currently being explored include topical biological agents such as tanafaercept (TNF – a inhibitor), topical anakinra (IL-1 antagonist).[153,154] These medications have been shown to decrease ocular surface staining and improve patient comfort. The role of proteoglycan-4 (lubricin) in maintaining ocular surface integrity and the health of the corneal epithelial cells is being investigated. Recombinant proteoglycan-4 has been studied in animal models and has been shown to objectively decrease the level and activity of inflammatory cytokines.[155,156] Thus, this molecule can not only better the surface lubrication but also exert anti-inflammatory properties. Other options that can offer therapeutic targets include costimulatory molecules such as CD40 as their levels are increased in SS.[106] Antibodies that block the effects of these ligands, such as iscalimab, can prevent the ensuing inflammatory mediator release.[106] Inhibition of the B-cell activating factor receptor by ianalumab has a similar mechanism, and preliminary studies with these molecules have shown promising results.[106] Newer formulations of existing drugs that improve upon the penetration and the side effect profile are also being explored.[3,157]
Conclusion
Although immunosuppression is indicated in eyes with DED, the exact indications and treatment protocols are not well elucidated and current management is usually carried out based on experience with other ocular inflammatory diseases. Future studies that look at these newer drugs in the context of the different etiologies and existing treatment modalities of ADDE will provide a better perspective of their safety and efficacy in these patients.
Financial support and sponsorship
This work was funded by the Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation Hyderabad, India. The sponsoring organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Yu L, Yu C, Dong H, Mu Y, Zhang R, Zhang Q, et al. Recent developments about the pathogenesis of dry eye disease:Based on immune inflammatory mechanisms. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:32887. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.732887. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.732887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, et al. TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:276–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Periman LM, Perez VL, Saban DR, Lin MC, Neri P. The immunological basis of dry eye disease and current topical treatment options. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2020;36:137–46. doi: 10.1089/jop.2019.0060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kate A, Basu S. Systemic immunosuppression in cornea and ocular surface disorders:A ready reckoner for ophthalmologists. Semin Ophthalmol. 2022;37:330–44. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1966059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stefanski AL, Tomiak C, Pleyer U, Dietrich T, Burmester GR, Dörner T. The diagnosis and treatment of Sjögren's syndrome. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114:354–61. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aoki T, Yokoi N, Nagata K, Deguchi H, Sekiyama Y, Sotozono C. Investigation of the relationship between ocular sarcoidosis and dry eye. Sci Rep. 2022;12:3469. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07435-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ogawa Y. Sjögren's syndrome, non-Sjögren's syndrome, and graft-versus-host disease related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:DES71–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-23750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Soifer M, Azar NS, Mousa HM, Perez VL. Ocular surface inflammatory disorders (OSID): A collective of systemic etiologies which cause or amplify dry eye syndrome. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:949202. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.949202. doi: 10.3389/fmed. 2022.949202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hong J, Zhu W, Zhuang H, Xu J, Sun X, Le Q, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy of conjunctival goblet cells in patients with Sjogren's syndrome dry eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:1454–8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.161059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kate A, Basu S. A review of the diagnosis and treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:836009. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.836009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sekhon AS, He B, Iovieno A, Yeung SN. Pathophysiology of corneal endothelial cell loss in dry eye disease and other inflammatory ocular disorders. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2023;31:21–31. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2021.1980808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.VanDerMeid KR, Su SP, Ward KW, Zhang JZ. Correlation of tear inflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases with four dry eye diagnostic tests. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:1512–8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chauhan SK, El Annan J, Ecoiffier T, Goyal S, Zhang Q, Saban DR, et al. Autoimmunity in dry eye is due to resistance of Th17 to Treg suppression. J Immunol. 2009;182:1247–52. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.3.1247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ponzini E, Scotti L, Grandori R, Tavazzi S, Zambon A. Lactoferrin concentration in human tears and ocular diseases:A meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61:9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.12.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhang Y, Lu C, Zhang J. Lactoferrin and its detection methods:A review. Nutrients. 2021;13:2492. doi: 10.3390/nu13082492. doi:10.3390/nu13082492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.van Setten GB. Osmokinetics:A new dynamic concept in dry eye disease. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2019;42:221–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2018.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pflugfelder SC. Antiinflammatory therapy for dry eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:337–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Abidi A, Shukla P, Ahmad A. Lifitegrast:A novel drug for treatment of dry eye disease. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2016;7:194–8. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.195920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Haber SL, Benson V, Buckway CJ, Gonzales JM, Romanet D, Scholes B. Lifitegrast:A novel drug for patients with dry eye disease. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2019;11:2515841419870366. doi: 10.1177/2515841419870366. doi:10.1177/2515841419870366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yeh S, Song XJ, Farley W, Li DQ, Stern ME, Pflugfelder SC. Apoptosis of ocular surface cells in experimentally induced dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:124–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gao J, Schwalb TA, Addeo JV, Ghosn CR, Stern ME. The role of apoptosis in the pathogenesis of canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca:The effect of topical Cyclosporin A therapy. Cornea. 1998;17:654–63. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199811000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu D, Ahmet A, Ward L, Krishnamoorthy P, Mandelcorn ED, Leigh R, et al. A practical guide to the monitoring and management of the complications of systemic corticosteroid therapy. Allergy Asth Clin Immun. 2013;9:1–25. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ramamoorthy S, Cidlowski JA. Corticosteroids:Mechanisms of action in health and disease. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2016;42:15–31, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Coutinho AE, Chapman KE. The anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids, recent developments and mechanistic insights. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011;335:2–13. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2010.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Smoak KA, Cidlowski JA. Mechanisms of glucocorticoid receptor signaling during inflammation. Mech Ageing Dev. 2004;125:697–706. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2004.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stellato C. Post-transcriptional and nongenomic effects of glucocorticoids. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2004;1:255–63. doi: 10.1513/pats.200402-015MS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ericson-Neilsen W, Kaye AD. Steroids:Pharmacology, complications, and practice delivery issues. Ochsner J. 2014;14:203–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gaballa SA, Kompella UB, Elgarhy O, Alqahtani AM, Pierscionek B, Alany RG, et al. Corticosteroids in ophthalmology:Drug delivery innovations, pharmacology, clinical applications, and future perspectives. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2021;11:866–93. doi: 10.1007/s13346-020-00843-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sousa FJ. The bioavailability and therapeutic effectiveness of prednisolone acetate vs. prednisolone sodium phosphate:A 20-year review. CLAO J. 1991;17:282–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Musson DG, Bidgood AM, Olejnik O. Assay methodology for prednisolone, prednisolone acetate and prednisolone sodium phosphate in rabbit aqueous humor and ocular physiological solutions. J Chromatogr. 1991;565:89–102. doi: 10.1016/0378-4347(91)80373-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bertelmann E, Pleyer U. Immunomodulatory therapy in ophthalmology-is there a place for topical application? Ophthalmologica. 2004;218:359–67. doi: 10.1159/000080937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ponticelli C, Reggiani F, Moroni G. Old and new calcineurin inhibitors in lupus nephritis. J Clin Med. 2021;10:4832. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ames P, Galor A. Cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsions for the treatment of dry eye:A review of the clinical evidence. Clin Investig (Lond) 2015;5:267–85. doi: 10.4155/cli.14.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Leonardi A, Van Setten G, Amrane M, Ismail D, Garrigue JS, Figueiredo FC, et al. Efficacy and safety of 0.1% cyclosporine A cationic emulsion in the treatment of severe dry eye disease:A multicenter randomized trial. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016;26:287–96. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kurt RA, Yalçindag N, Atilla H, Arat M. Topical cyclosporine-A in dry eye associated with chronic graft versus host disease. Ann Ophthalmol (Skokie) 2009;41:166–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Goldberg DF, Malhotra RP, Schechter BA, Justice A, Weiss SL, Sheppard JD. A phase 3, randomized, double-masked study of OTX-101 ophthalmic solution 0.09% in the treatment of dry eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:1230–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sheppard J, Kannarr S, Luchs J, Malhotra R, Justice A, Ogundele A, et al. Efficacy and safety of OTX-101, a novel nanomicellar formulation of cyclosporine a, for the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca:Pooled analysis of a phase 2b/3 and phase 3 study. Eye Contact Lens. 2020;46((Suppl 1)):S14–9. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Weiss SL, Kramer WG. Ocular distribution of cyclosporine following topical administration of OTX-101 in New Zealand White Rabbits. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2019;35:395–402. doi: 10.1089/jop.2018.0106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shoughy SS. Topical tacrolimus in anterior segment inflammatory disorders. Eye Vis (Lond) 2017;4:7. doi: 10.1186/s40662-017-0072-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Garg V, Jain GK, Nirmal J, Kohli K. Topical tacrolimus nanoemulsion, a promising therapeutic approach for uveitis. Med Hypotheses. 2013;81:901–4. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pleyer U, Lutz S, Jusko WJ, Nguyen KD, Narawane M, Rückert D, et al. Ocular absorption of topically applied FK506 from liposomal and oil formulations in the rabbit eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:2737–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nankivell BJ, PʼNg CH, OʼConnell PJ, Chapman JR. Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity through the lens of longitudinal histology:Comparison of cyclosporine and tacrolimus eras. Transplantation. 2016;100:1723–31. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jabs DA, Rosenbaum JT. Guidelines for the use of immunosuppressive drugs in patients with ocular inflammatory disorders:Recommendations of an expert panel. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:679. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)00830-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hornbeak DM, Thorne JE. Immunosuppressive therapy for eye diseases:Effectiveness, safety, side effects and their prevention. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2015;5:156–63. doi: 10.1016/j.tjo.2015.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Saburi M, Kohashi S, Kato J, Koda Y, Sakurai M, Toyama T, et al. Effects of calcineurin inhibitors on sodium excretion in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol. 2017;106:431–5. doi: 10.1007/s12185-017-2253-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lopes PC, Fuhrmann A, Carvalho F, Sereno J, Santos MR, Pereira MJ, et al. Cyclosporine A enhances gluconeogenesis while sirolimus impairs insulin signaling in peripheral tissues after 3 weeks of treatment. Biochem Pharmacol. 2014;91:61–73. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2014.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Song YH, Cai GY, Xiao YF, Wang YP, Yuan BS, Xia YY, et al. Efficacy and safety of calcineurin inhibitor treatment for IgA nephropathy:A meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18:61. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0467-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li HY, Zhang X, Zhou T, Zhong Z, Zhong H. Efficacy and safety of cyclosporine a for patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome:A meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20:384. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1575-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.U.S. Multicenter FK506 Liver Study Group. A comparison of tacrolimus (FK 506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression in liver transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1110–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199410273311702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rangel EB. Tacrolimus in pancreas transplant:A focus on toxicity, diabetogenic effect and drug-drug interactions. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2014;10:1585–605. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2014.964205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Abe S, Katsushima H, Fujishima F, Nomura J, Kameoka J, Ichinohasama R. A case study of t (14;22) (q32;q11) involving immunoglobulin heavy and light chain in follicular lymphoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11:448–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cubuk MO, Ucgul AY, Ozgur A, Ozulken K, Yuksel E. Topical cyclosporine a (0.05%) treatment in dry eye patients:A comparison study of Sjogren's syndrome versus non-Sjogren's syndrome. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41:1479–85. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01708-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Colvin OM. An overview of cyclophosphamide development and clinical applications. Curr Pharm Des. 1999;5:555–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mills KA, Chess-Williams R, McDermott C. Novel insights into the mechanism of cyclophosphamide-induced bladder toxicity:Chloroacetaldehyde's contribution to urothelial dysfunction in vitro. Arch Toxicol. 2019;93:3291–303. doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02589-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dan D, Fischer R, Adler S, Förger F, Villiger PM. Cyclophosphamide:As bad as its reputation?Long-term single centre experience of cyclophosphamide side effects in the treatment of systemic autoimmune diseases. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w14030. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.14030. doi:10.4414/smw.2014.14030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Martin F, Lauwerys B, Lefèbvre C, Devogelaer JP, Houssiau FA. Side-effects of intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy. Lupus. 1997;6:254–7. doi: 10.1177/096120339700600307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gajjar R, Miller SD, Meyers KE, Ginsberg JP. Fertility preservation in patients receiving cyclophosphamide therapy for renal disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2015;30:1099–106. doi: 10.1007/s00467-014-2897-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lansiaux A. [Antimetabolites] Bull Cancer. 2011;98:1263–74. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2011.1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Anstey AV, Wakelin S, Reynolds NJ British Association of Dermatologists Therapy, Guidelines and Audit Subcommittee. Guidelines for prescribing azathioprine in dermatology. Br J Dermatol. 2004;151:1123–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06323.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tian H, Cronstein BN. Understanding the mechanisms of action of methotrexate:Implications for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2007;65:168–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Riksen NP, Barrera P, van den Broek PHH, van Riel PLCM, Smits P, Rongen GA. Methotrexate modulates the kinetics of adenosine in humans in vivo. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:465–70. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.048637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Allison AC. Mechanisms of action of mycophenolate mofetil. Lupus. 2005;14((Suppl 1)):s2–8. doi: 10.1191/0961203305lu2109oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mishra K, Pramanik S, Sandal R, Jandial A, Sahu KK, Singh K, et al. Safety and efficacy of azathioprine in immune thrombocytopenia. Am J Blood Res. 2021;11:217–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lucas CJ, Dimmitt SB, Martin JH. Optimising low-dose methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis-A review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;85:2228–34. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bello AE, Perkins EL, Jay R, Efthimiou P. Recommendations for optimizing methotrexate treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Open Access Rheumatol. 2017;9:67–79. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S131668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bannwarth B, Labat L, Moride Y, Schaeverbeke T. Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. An update. Drugs. 1994;47:25–50. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199447010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Whittle SL, Hughes RA. Folate supplementation and methotrexate treatment in rheumatoid arthritis:A review. Rheumatology. 2004;43:267–71. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Braun J, Kästner P, Flaxenberg P, Währisch J, Hanke P, Demary W, et al. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus oral administration of methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis:Results of a six-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase IV trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:73–81. doi: 10.1002/art.23144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kromann CB, Lage-Hansen PR, Koefoed M, Jemec GBE. Does switching from oral to subcutaneous administration of methotrexate influence on patient reported gastro-intestinal adverse effects?J Dermatolog Treat. 2015;26:188–90. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2014.927817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wegrzyn J, Adeleine P, Miossec P. Better efficacy of methotrexate given by intramuscular injection than orally in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1232–4. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.011593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lau CH, Comer M, Lightman S. Long-term efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in the control of severe intraocular inflammation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;31:487–91. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00704.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Maneiro JR, Lopez-Canoa N, Salgado E, Gomez-Reino JJ. Maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis with mycophenolate or azathioprine:Systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology. 2014;53:834–8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Jacob A, Matiello M, Weinshenker BG, Wingerchuk DM, Lucchinetti C, Shuster E, et al. Treatment of neuromyelitis optica with mycophenolate mofetil:Retrospective analysis of 24 patients. Arch Neurol. 2009;66:1128–33. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Nielsen OH, Vainer B, Rask-Madsen J. Review article:The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with 6-mercaptopurine or azathioprine. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:1699–708. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01102.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sheiko MA, Sundaram SS, Capocelli KE, Pan Z, McCoy AM, Mack CL. Outcomes in pediatric autoimmune hepatitis and significance of azathioprine metabolites. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;65:80–5. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tashkin DP, Roth MD, Clements PJ, Furst DE, Khanna D, Kleerup EC, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil versus oral cyclophosphamide in scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease:Scleroderma lung study II (SLS-II), a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4:708–19. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30152-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Jack KL, Koopman WJ, Hulley D, Nicolle MW. A review of azathioprine-associated hepatotoxicity and myelosuppression in myasthenia gravis. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2016;18:12–20. doi: 10.1097/CND.0000000000000133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, Feldman SR, Gelfand JM, Gordon KB, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis:Section 4. Guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with traditional systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:451–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Chande N, Wang Y, MacDonald JK, McDonald JWD. Methotrexate for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014:CD006618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006618.pub3. doi:10.1002/14651858. CD006618.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Daniel E, Thorne JE, Newcomb CW, Pujari SS, Kaçmaz RO, Levy-Clarke GA, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil for ocular inflammation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:423–432.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.van Gelder T, Hesselink DA. Mycophenolate revisited. Transpl Int. 2015;28:508–15. doi: 10.1111/tri.12554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Perez VL, Pflugfelder SC, Zhang S, Shojaei A, Haque R. Lifitegrast, a novel integrin antagonist for treatment of dry eye disease. Ocul Surf. 2016;14:207–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2016.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Pflugfelder SC, Stern M, Zhang S, Shojaei A. LFA-1/ICAM-1 interaction as a therapeutic target in dry eye disease. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2017;33:5–12. doi: 10.1089/jop.2016.0105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Murphy CJ, Bentley E, Miller PE, McIntyre K, Leatherberry G, Dubielzig R, et al. The pharmacologic assessment of a novel lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 antagonist (SAR. 1118) for the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca in dogs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:3174–80. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-5078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Holland EJ, Luchs J, Karpecki PM, Nichols KK, Jackson MA, Sall K, et al. Lifitegrast for the treatment of dry eye disease:Results of a phase III, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial (OPUS-3) Ophthalmology. 2017;124:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Sheppard JD, Torkildsen GL, Lonsdale JD, D'Ambrosio FA, McLaurin EB, Eiferman RA, et al. Lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% for treatment of dry eye disease:Results of the OPUS-1 phase 3 study. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:475–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Li JX, Tsai YY, Lai CT, Li YL, Wu YH, Chiang CC. Lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5% Is a safe and efficient eyedrop for dry eye disease:A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11:5014. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175014. doi:10.3390/jcm11175014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Thulasi P, Djalilian AR. Update in current diagnostics and therapeutics of dry eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:S27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Toyos M, Toyos R, Jodoin B, Bunch R. Results from a prospective, open-label, phase 4 pilot study of repository corticotropin injection for moderate and severe dry eye disease. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022;11:1231–40. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00501-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Benko AL, McAloose CA, Becker PM, Wright D, Sunyer T, Kawasawa YI, et al. Repository corticotrophin injection exerts direct acute effects on human B cell gene expression distinct from the actions of glucocorticoids. Clin Exp Immunol. 2018;192:68–81. doi: 10.1111/cei.13089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Olsen NJ, Decker DA, Higgins P, Becker PM, McAloose CA, Benko AL, et al. Direct effects of HP Acthar Gel on human B lymphocyte activation in vitro. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:300. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0823-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wirta D, McLaurin E, Ousler G, Liu J, Kacmaz RO, Grieco J. Repository corticotropin injection (Acthar®Gel) for refractory severe noninfectious keratitis:Efficacy and safety from a phase 4, multicenter, open-label study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2021;10:1077–92. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00400-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Liu Z, Chen D, Chen X, Bian F, Qin W, Gao N, et al. Trehalose induces autophagy against inflammation by activating TFEB signaling pathway in human corneal epithelial cells exposed to hyperosmotic stress. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61:26. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.10.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Rusmini P, Cortese K, Crippa V, Cristofani R, Cicardi ME, Ferrari V, et al. Trehalose induces autophagy via lysosomal-mediated TFEB activation in models of motoneuron degeneration. Autophagy. 2019;15:631–51. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1535292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Schmidl D, Schmetterer L, Witkowska KJ, Unterhuber A, dos Santos VA, Kaya S, et al. Tear film thickness after treatment with artificial tears in patients with moderate dry eye disease. Cornea. 2015;34:421–6. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Mittal R, Patel S, Galor A. Alternative therapies for dry eye disease. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2021;32:348–61. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Fariselli C, Giannaccare G, Fresina M, Versura P. Trehalose/hyaluronate eyedrop effects on ocular surface inflammatory markers and mucin expression in dry eye patients. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1293–300. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S174290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kruize AA, Hené RJ, Kallenberg CG, van Bijsterveld OP, van der Heide A, Kater L, et al. Hydroxychloroquine treatment for primary Sjögren's syndrome:A two year double blind crossover trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993;52:360–4. doi: 10.1136/ard.52.5.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Gottenberg JE, Ravaud P, Puéchal X, Le Guern V, Sibilia J, Goeb V, et al. Effects of hydroxychloroquine on symptomatic improvement in primary Sjögren syndrome:The JOQUER randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;312:249–58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Silva JC da, Mariz HA, Rocha LF da, Oliveira PSS de, Dantas AT, Duarte ALBP, et al. Hydroxychloroquine decreases Th17-related cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2013;68:766–71. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(06)07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Yoon CH, Lee HJ, Lee EY, Lee EB, Lee WW, Kim MK, et al. Effect of hydroxychloroquine treatment on dry eyes in subjects with primary Sjögren's syndrome:A double-blind randomized control study. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31:1127–35. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.7.1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Yavuz S, Asfuroğlu E, Bicakcigil M, Toker E. Hydroxychloroquine improves dry eye symptoms of patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome. Rheumatol Int. 2011;31:1045–9. doi: 10.1007/s00296-010-1415-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Rihl M, Ulbricht K, Schmidt RE, Witte T. Treatment of sicca symptoms with hydroxychloroquine in patients with Sjogren's syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48:796–9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Jackson JM. TNF- alpha inhibitors. Dermatol Ther. 2007;20:251–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2007.00138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Carsons SE, Vivino FB, Parke A, Carteron N, Sankar V, Brasington R, et al. Treatment guidelines for rheumatologic manifestations of Sjögren's syndrome:Use of biologic agents, management of fatigue, and inflammatory musculoskeletal pain. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:517–27. doi: 10.1002/acr.22968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Mavragani CP, Moutsopoulos HM. Sjögren's syndrome:Old and new therapeutic targets. J Autoimmun. 2020;110:102364. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.102364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Maloney DG, Smith B, Rose A. Rituximab:Mechanism of action and resistance. Semin Oncol. 2002;29((1 Suppl 2)):2–9. doi: 10.1053/sonc.2002.30156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Barabino S, Horwath-Winter J, Messmer EM, Rolando M, Aragona P, Kinoshita S. The role of systemic and topical fatty acids for dry eye treatment. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;61:23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Sheppard JD, Singh R, McClellan AJ, Weikert MP, Scoper SV, Joly TJ, et al. Long-term supplementation with n-6 and n-3 PUFAs improves moderate-to-severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca:A randomized double-blind clinical trial. Cornea. 2013;32:1297–304. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318299549c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Deinema LA, Vingrys AJ, Wong CY, Jackson DC, Chinnery HR, Downie LE. A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial of two forms of omega-3 supplements for treating dry eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Li Z, Choi JH, Oh HJ, Park SH, Lee JB, Yoon KC. Effects of eye drops containing a mixture of omega-3 essential fatty acids and hyaluronic acid on the ocular surface in desiccating stress-induced murine dry eye. Curr Eye Res. 2014;39:871–8. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2014.884595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Czernik A, Toosi S, Bystryn JC, Grando SA. Intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of autoimmune bullous dermatoses:An update. Autoimmunity. 2012;45:111–8. doi: 10.3109/08916934.2011.606452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Ma L, You C, Anesi SD, Foster CS. The efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:4370. [Google Scholar]
- 114.Matossian C, Trattler W, Loh J. Dry eye treatment with topical cyclosporine 0.1% in chondroitin sulfate ophthalmic emulsion. Clinical Ophthalmol. 2021;15:1979–84. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S308088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Tauber J, Schechter BA, Bacharach J, Toyos MM, Smyth-Medina R, Weiss SL, et al. A Phase II/III, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, dose-ranging study of the safety and efficacy of OTX-101 in the treatment of dry eye disease. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1921–9. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S175065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Toker E, Asfuroğlu E. Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity in patients with dry eye:The effect of topical cyclosporine therapy. Cornea. 2010;29:133–40. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181acf68d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Moscovici BK, Holzchuh R, Sakassegawa-Naves FE, Hoshino-Ruiz DR, Albers MBV, Santo RM, et al. Treatment of Sjögren's syndrome dry eye using 0.03% tacrolimus eye drop:Prospective double-blind randomized study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38:373–8. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2015.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Moscovici BK, Holzchuh R, Chiacchio BB, Santo RM, Shimazaki J, Hida RY. Clinical treatment of dry eye using 0.03% tacrolimus eye drops. Cornea. 2012;31:945–9. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f8c9b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Moawad P, Shamma R, Hassanein D, Ragab G, El Zawahry O. Evaluation of the effect of topical tacrolimus 0.03% versus cyclosporine 0.05% in the treatment of dry eye secondary to Sjogren syndrome. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022;32:673–9. doi: 10.1177/1120672121992680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Kunert KS, Tisdale AS, Gipson IK. Goblet cell numbers and epithelial proliferation in the conjunctiva of patients with dry eye syndrome treated with cyclosporine. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:330–7. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.3.330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Demiryay E, Yaylali V, Cetin EN, Yildirim C. Effects of topical cyclosporine a plus artificial tears versus artificial tears treatment on conjunctival goblet cell density in dysfunctional tear syndrome. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37:312–5. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31822563be. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Geerling G, Raus P, Murube J. Minor salivary gland transplantation. Dev Ophthalmol. 2008;41:243–54. doi: 10.1159/000131093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Baudouin C, de la Maza MS, Amrane M, Garrigue JS, Ismail D, Figueiredo FC, et al. One-year efficacy and safety of 0.1% cyclosporine a cationic emulsion in the treatment of severe dry eye disease. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017;27:678–85. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5001002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Labetoulle M, Leonardi A, Amrane M, Ismail D, Garrigue JS, Garhöfer G, et al. Persistence of efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporin a cationic emulsion in subjects with severe keratitis due to dry eye disease:A nonrandomized, open-label extension of the SANSIKA study. Clin Ther. 2018;40:1894–906. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Kaegi C, Wuest B, Schreiner J, Steiner UC, Vultaggio A, Matucci A, et al. Systematic review of safety and efficacy of rituximab in treating immune-mediated disorders. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1990. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01990. doi: 10.3389/fimmu. 2019.01990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Jang DI, Lee AH, Shin HY, Song HR, Park JH, Kang TB, et al. The role of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in autoimmune disease and current TNF-α inhibitors in therapeutics. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:2719. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052719. doi:10.3390/ijms22052719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Hazlewood GS, Barnabe C, Tomlinson G, Marshall D, Devoe DJA, Bombardier C. Methotrexate monotherapy and methotrexate combination therapy with traditional and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis:A network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016:CD010227. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010227.pub2. doi:10.1002/14651858. CD010227.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Ruiz-Irastorza G, Bertsias G. Treating systemic lupus erythematosus in the 21st century:New drugs and new perspectives on old drugs. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020;59((Suppl 5)):v69–81. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Donthineni PR, Das AV, Shanbhag SS, Basu S. Cataract surgery in dry eye disease:Visual outcomes and complications. Front Med. 2020;7:575834. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.575834. doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.575834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Miserocchi E, Baltatzis S, Roque MR, Ahmed AR, Foster CS. The effect of treatment and its related side effects in patients with severe ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:111–8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00863-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Pujari SS, Kempen JH, Newcomb CW, Gangaputra S, Daniel E, Suhler EB, et al. Cyclophosphamide for ocular inflammatory diseases. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:356–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Foster CS, Chang PY, Ahmed AR. Combination of rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin for recalcitrant ocular cicatricial pemphigoid:A preliminary report. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:861–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Branisteanu DC, Stoleriu G, Branisteanu DE, Boda D, Branisteanu CI, Maranduca MA, et al. Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (Review) Exp Ther Med. 2020;20:3379–82. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Bevans SL, Parker J, Ivey JM, Pavlidakey P, Sami N. Rituximab as an adjuvant rescue treatment for ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Cornea. 2021;40:1440–4. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Doan S, Stephan S, Prost C, Alexandre M, Cochereau I, Gabison E. Efficacy of rituximab in severe ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:2115. [Google Scholar]
- 136.Kawasaki S, Nishida K, Sotozono C, Quantock AJ, Kinoshita S. Conjunctival inflammation in the chronic phase of Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1191–3. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.10.1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.De Rojas MV, Dart JKG, Saw VPJ. The natural history of Stevens-Johnson syndrome:Patterns of chronic ocular disease and the role of systemic immunosuppressive therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1048–53. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.109124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Puangsricharern V, Tseng SC. Cytologic evidence of corneal diseases with limbal stem cell deficiency. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1476–85. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30842-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Balkrishnan C, Sharma V, Vyas A. Immunosuppressive therapy in inflammatory ocular surface disease post Steven Johnson syndrome. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59:69–70. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.73701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Lee YJ, Kim SW, Seo KY. Application for tacrolimus ointment in treating refractory inflammatory ocular surface diseases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155:804–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Nair S, Vanathi M, Mukhija R, Tandon R, Jain S, Ogawa Y. Update on ocular graft-versus-host disease. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69:1038–50. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2016_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Sanz-Marco E, Udaondo P, García-Delpech S, Vazquez A, Diaz-Llopis M. Treatment of refractory dry eye associated with graft versus host disease with 0.03% tacrolimus eyedrops. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2013;29:776–83. doi: 10.1089/jop.2012.0265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Wang Y, Ogawa Y, Dogru M, Kawai M, Tatematsu Y, Uchino M, et al. Ocular surface and tear functions after topical cyclosporine treatment in dry eye patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008;41:293–302. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Rao SN, Rao RD. Efficacy of topical cyclosporine 0.05% in the treatment of dry eye associated with graft versus host disease. Cornea. 2006;25:674–8. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000208813.17367.0c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Jung JW, Lee YJ, Yoon SC, Kim TI, Kim EK, Seo KY. Long-term result of maintenance treatment with tacrolimus ointment in chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:519–27.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Khoury HJ, Langston AA, Kota VK, Wilkinson JA, Pusic I, Jillella A, et al. Ruxolitinib:A steroid sparing agent in chronic graft-versus-host disease. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018;53:826–31. doi: 10.1038/s41409-017-0081-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Zeiser R, Polverelli N, Ram R, Hashmi SK, Chakraverty R, Middeke JM, et al. Ruxolitinib for glucocorticoid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:228–38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2033122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Kheirkhah A, Di Zazzo A, Satitpitakul V, Fernandez M, Magilavy D, Dana R. A pilot randomized trial on safety and efficacy of a novel topical combined inhibitor of Janus kinase 1/3 and spleen tyrosine kinase for GVHD-associated ocular surface disease. Cornea. 2017;36:799–804. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Pérez-Simón JA, Sánchez-Abarca I, Díez-Campelo M, Caballero D, San Miguel J. Chronic graft-versus-host disease:Pathogenesis and clinical management. Drugs. 2006;66:1041–57. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666080-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Solomon SR, Sizemore CA, Ridgeway M, Zhang X, Smith J, Brown S, et al. Corticosteroid-free primary treatment of chronic extensive graft-versus-host disease incorporating rituximab. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:1576–82. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Dietrich-Ntoukas T, Cursiefen C, Westekemper H, Eberwein P, Reinhard T, Bertz H, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease:Report from the German-Austrian-Swiss consensus conference on clinical practice in chronic GVHD. Cornea. 2012;31:299–310. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318226bf97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Ogawa Y, Okamoto S, Kuwana M, Mori T, Watanabe R, Nakajima T, et al. Successful treatment of dry eye in two patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease with systemic administration of FK506 and corticosteroids. Cornea. 2001;20:430–4. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200105000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Dong Y, Wang S, Cong L, Zhang T, Cheng J, Yang N, et al. TNF-α inhibitor tanfanercept (HBM9036) improves signs and symptoms of dry eye in a phase 2 trial in the controlled adverse environment in China. Int Ophthalmol. 2022;42:2459–72. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02245-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Vijmasi T, Chen FYT, Chen YT, Gallup M, McNamara N. Topical administration of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist as a therapy for aqueous-deficient dry eye in autoimmune disease. Mol Vis. 2013;19:1957–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Menon NG, Goyal R, Lema C, Woods PS, Tanguay AP, Morin AA, et al. Proteoglycan 4 (PRG4) expression and function in dry eye associated inflammation. Exp Eye Res. 2021;208:108628. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2021.108628. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2021.108628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Regmi SC, Samsom ML, Heynen ML, Jay GD, Sullivan BD, Srinivasan S, et al. Degradation of proteoglycan 4/lubricin by cathepsin S:Potential mechanism for diminished ocular surface lubrication in Sjögren's syndrome. Exp Eye Res. 2017;161:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2017.05.006. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2017.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Periman LM, Mah FS, Karpecki PM. A review of the mechanism of action of cyclosporine A:The role of cyclosporine A in dry eye disease and recent formulation developments. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:4187–200. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S279051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



