Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2023 Jun 17;13:9849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37099-9

Electro-optical properties of strained monolayer boron phosphide

Mohammad Mortezaei Nobahari 1,
PMCID: PMC10276846  PMID: 37330598

Abstract

In this paper, we use tight-binding approximation and linear response theory to study the electronic and optical properties of strained monolayer boron-phosphide (h-BP). Compared with the previous DFT study and adding on-site energy variation to the Hamiltonian, we propose a theoretical approach to investigate the strain effects on the electronic and optical properties of the h-BP. Applying tensile strain increases the gap while compressive strain reduces it as the maximum and minimum of the gap are 1.45 eV and 1.14 eV respectively and are related to the biaxial strain. Also, we investigate the optical conductivity and electron energy loss spectrum (EELS) of the pristine and strained h-BP. The absorption peak of the σxx,yy appears in energy about 4 eV but applying strain shifts the peak’s energy. Optical properties of pristine h-BP are isotopic and biaxial strain preserves this isotropy, but uniaxial strain exerts anisotropic behavior in the system.

Subject terms: Condensed-matter physics, Optical physics

Introduction

Today, two-dimensional (2D) materials have attracted researchers due to their inherent features. Inspired by graphene, the researchers were able to synthesize other 2D materials, such as silicone1, phosphorene2, borophene3, etc. Today, a large number of 2D materials have been synthesized. Looking for novel alternative materials is still interesting and challenging for various practical applications requiring different finite band gaps and on/off ratios. Phosphorene is a good candidate with a moderate band gap, good carrier mobility, and a high on/off ratio to replace silicene and graphene in the nanoelectronics field but, phosphorene has a fatal weakness in structural stability.

Among the 2D materials, boron-phosphide has good structural and mechanical stability and high carrier mobility46. Unlike graphene, the h-BP is a semiconductor with a direct band gap of 0.9–1.37 eV68. A recent theoretical study shows that n-type and p-type doped boron-phosphide monolayer can be used as an ideal 2D p–n junction, exhibiting diode characteristics with high current rectification and negative differential resistance5. Using ab initio studies on phonon modes without imaginary frequencies and molecular dynamics simulations, it has been well-proven that h-BP is stable at high temperatures and atmospheres4,911. Experimentally, epitaxial growth of h-BP films was synthesized on aluminum nitride (AIN)/sapphir substrates using chemical vapor deposition12. Other boron-phosphide allotropes have been predicted by density functional theory (DFT) calculations13.

Recently, a new member of hexagonal and orthorhombic 2D materials has been predicted using first principles and DFT calculations1416. These semiconductor materials structurally are similar to the h-BP, but due to their different atomic composition and electronic structure, they possess distinct electronic and optical properties. Furthermore, the methodology used in these articles differs from those studied in previous works. The effects of atomic structure, external electric field, and stacking orders on the electronic properties of few-layer boron-phosphide are studied theoretically1720. In a study by Wei et al.21, they investigated the effect of vacancy defects on the electronic properties of the monolayer boron nitride and found that B-vacancy, N-vacancy, and double vacancy defects can eliminate bandgap from direct to indirect. Among various ways to modulate the electronic features of 2D systems, in general, defects and strains in the process of synthesis of 2D materials are ineluctable2127, and effort to understand strain effects on the synthesized materials is very important in the nanoelectronic industry28,29.

There are many methods to apply strain to the 2D materials in the experiment such as bending30,31, stretching32, pressure33, substrate-induced strain34, and thermal expansion35. The most common method for applying strain is to use a substrate with a different lattice constant. When the material is grown or transferred onto such a substrate, it experiences strain due to the mismatch in lattice constants, which can be controlled by adjusting the temperature and pressure during growth or transfer.

To date, several studies have been published about the strain effect on similar materials such as boron nitride, but they didn’t consider on-site energy modification by strain. In this study, we also added the on-site energy variation to the Hamiltonian and proposed a theoretical method to study the strain effect on such materials. Although many DFT studies have addressed the strain effect on the h-BP, there is no study that uses a tight-binding approximation to date. The tight-binding approximation is a powerful tool for studying the material’s properties. Due to the remarkable similarity of this approximation with DFT calculations3638, we would also employ it to study the electro-optical properties of strained h-BP. The purpose of this paper is to study strain effects on the electronic and optical properties of the h-BP based on tight-binding approximation compared to other DFT methods. We also use linear response theory along with the Kubo formula to calculate the intra-band and inter-band optical conductivity (IOC) as well as EELS.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section “Theoretical background” we present the theoretical background for the electronic and optical properties of the pristine and strain-induced h-BP. The numerical results for the pristine and strained cases are discussed in Section “Discussion”. In Section “Conclusions” we will present a summary of the results.

Theoretical background

Pristine h-BP

h-BP, like graphene, has a honeycomb structure, but different lattice constant and on-site energies. Figure 1 shows the geometry structure of the h-BP with two different B (boron) and P (phosphorus) atoms that are displayed in blue and red colors respectively. The lattice constant of the h-BP is a=b=3.211 Å and B-P bond length is a0=1.861 Å6. Overlap and next-nearest-neighbor hopping have a low contribution in our calculation39, and we can ignore them. Therefore, the tight-binding Hamiltonian of the h-BP considering the nearest neighbors is

H=εpt0ϕt0ϕεb 1

where εp=-3.276 and εb=-1.979 eV19 are on-site energies of P and B atoms respectively, ϕ=e-ikxa+2eikxa/2cos3kya/2 is the structural factor and t0=-1.844 eV is the hopping parameter. By diagonalization of Eq. (1) energy dispersion of the h-BP is

ενk=εp+εb2+νεp-εb22+t02ϕ2 2

where ν=±1 referred to the conduction and valence bands respectively. Figure 2 shows the h-BP band structure along the Γ-K-M-Γ in first Brillouin zone (FBZ) with coordinates Γ=0,0, K=2π/3a0,2π/33a0, and M=2π/3a0,0. As shown in Fig. 2 the minimum of the conduction band and the maximum of the valence band coincide at the K point therefore by substituting these coordinates in Eq. (2) the h-BP gap is εg=εp-εb=1.297 eV. The Fermi energy locates at the midgap between the conduction and the valence bands in the energy equal to -2.627 eV. Figure 3 shows a 3D overview of the h-BP band structure. We can see the similarity between the graphene and h-BP band structures except in the gap amount.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Geometry structure of the h-BP. The boron (B) and phosphorus (P) atoms are represented in blue and red colors respectively. The nearest-neighbor vectors are represented by δj (j = 1, 2, 3). The unit cell is shown as a parallelogram with length a = b = 3.213 Å and consists of two atoms. This figure is generated by CrystalMaker version 10.7.1.300.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Band structure of the pristine h-BP in Γ-K-M-Γ direction. Right: first Brillouin zone of the monolayer h-BP.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Band structure of the pristine h-BP with 3D first Brillouin zone. Right: Dirac cone around the K point. This figure is generated by Matlab version 9.4.0.813654 (R2018a).

Hamiltonian of the strain-induced h-BP

In the pristine case, all hopping parameters are equal due to the equality of the nearest-neighbor lengths. But, when the strain is applied, the length of the nearest neighbors changes, and we have different hopping parameters. The hopping parameters tj are a function of the δj as t1δ1, t2δ2 and t3δ3, that δj are nearest-neighbor vectors as δ1=a01/2,3/2, δ2=a01/2,-3/2, and δ3=a0-1,0 (see Fig. 1). The strain-induced h-BP Hamiltonian is

H=εpj=13tjeik.δjj=13tje-ik.δjεb 3

where tj is the modified hopping parameter by strain and εp and εb are on-site energies of the strained h-BP. The energy dispersion relation is

ενk=εp+εb2+νεp-εb22+|j=13tjeik.δj|2. 4

Uniaxial strain effects on the nearest-neighbor bonds

In the real space, if ρ0 represents a pristine bond vector, the new bond length after stretching is equal to

ρ=I+ε.ρ0, 5

where I is the unitary matrix. Since the h-BP hopping parameters depend on the nearest-neighbor lengths, we need to calculate the deformed bond lengths. Using Eq. (5) the magnitude of the nearest-neighbor lengths read as

δ1=a01+εxx4+3εyy4+3εxy2. 6
δ2=a01+εxx4+3εyy4-3εxy2. 7
δ3=a01+εxx. 8

where we have considered εxy=εyx and the second order of the strain is neglected.

Our preferred directions for applying strain are along the armchair(AC), zigzag (ZZ), and uniform biaxial strain. By considering our desired directions, strain tensors are as follows

εZ=ε0001, 9
εA=ε1000, 10
εB=ε1001, 11

where εA, εZ, and εB are the AC, ZZ, and biaxial strain tensors, and ε is the applied strain. Therefore, the length of the new bonds after applying strain along the desired directions is given as

ZZ:δ1=δ2=a01+34εδ3=a0. 12
Biaxial:δ1=δ2=a01+ε4+3ε4δ3=a01+ε. 13
AC:δ1=δ2=a01+14εδ3=a01+ε. 14

As in real space, the strain also affects lattice vectors in reciprocal space and causes high symmetry points to shift. Using Eq. (5) the new position of the M and K points are given as

M=2π3a01-εxx,-εxy. 15
K=2π3a01-εxx-εxy3,-εyy3-εxy+13. 16

Hopping renormalization

One method to obtain the hopping energies as a function of the bond length is to use Harrison’s rule (t1/l2), but this expression is only valid at equilibrium distance and fails away40. A more accurate expression for the hopping parameter is an exponential decay41

tj=t0e-βδj/a0-1. 17

where β is the Grüneisen parameter. The Grüneisen parameter (β) is an important thermodynamic quantity that characterizes the behavior of materials under high pressure. In the h-BP case, this parameter has been recently calculated42. The Grüneisen parameter definition is

β=-lntlna0=1.51. 18

Strain effect on the on-site energy

In addition to the hopping parameters, the on-site energies also can be modified by strain. The linear elastic theory is a method to investigate the strain effects on the on-site energies. Because of the similarity between the graphene and h-BP, we can use results obtained from Ref.24. Applying strain changes the total Hamiltonian matrix as follows:

H=εp+3a02εpa0εxx+εyyj=13tjeik.δjj=13tje-ik.δjεb+3a02εba0εxx+εyy. 19

As mentioned in Ref.24, the correction term in the on-site energies is not related to the low-energy Hamiltonian, and we can use it in the full band Hamiltonian, so this justifies the validity of Eq. (19).

The deformation potential matrix is another way to study strain effects on the on-site energies. Applying strain to the h-BP creates a diagonal deformation potential matrix as a function of the Fermi energy and strain. Diagonal potential matrix for the h-BP is43

V=g1εxx+εyy00g2εxx+εyy, 20

where g1 and g2 are a function of the Fermi energy. The existence of two different atoms in the h-BP creates a difference in the diagonal potentials, resulting in g1 g2. This is different from graphene, where diagonal potentials are equal to the Fermi energy (g1=g2=EF)43. Therefore, the total Hamiltonian after applying strain is as follows

H=H0+V=εpj=13tjeik.δjj=13tje-ik.δjεb. 21

Here tj is the modified hopping parameter by strain. So the new on-site energies after applying strain to the h-BP are εp=εp+g1εxx+εyy and εb=εb+g2εxx+εyy. By comparing Eqs. (19) and (21) we can connect the parameters in refs.24,43

g1=3a02εpa0. 22
g2=3a02εba0. 23

To calculate parameters g1 and g2, we have to compare our results with DFT. For this purpose, we plotted band gap variation versus strains and fit that by results obtained from ref.44.

Electronic density of states

Using Green’s function method, we can calculate the density of states (DOS) of the pristine and strain-induced h-BP. We can obtain the density of states of the h-BP by summing over the FBZ as follows

Dε=-1NcπkITrGk,ε, 24

where Nc=2 denotes the number of atoms per unit cell and non-interacting Green’s function matrix is obtained by Gk,ε=ε+iη-Hk-1 where η is broadening factor. The Green function matrix is

Gk,ε=GxxGxyGyxGyy, 25

Using Eqs. (24) and (25) total DOS reads

Dε=-1NcπkIGxx+Gyy. 26

The partial density of states (PDOS) can be calculated straightforwardly as

PDOSi=-1πIα,αOi|αGααα|Oi 27

where i is the PDOS index and Oi represents the eigenvector of the i state.

Optical conductivity

In general, Ohm’s law is J=σE where J is the current density, E is the electric field, and σ is the optical conductivity tensor.

σ=σxxσxyσyxσyy, 28

To calculate the optical conductivity, first, we need the direction-depended velocities. For this purpose, we can write the strain-induced Hamiltonian as

H=εpgkgkεb, 29

where gk=j=13tjeik.δj. The current operator definition is jμ=eH/kμ

jμ=e0gkkμgkkμ0, 30

Also, the general form of the current operator is

jμ=-eħkckckαkμ+ieħkckckβkμ 31

that αkμ and βkμ are intra-band and inter-band direction-depended velocities along the μ-direction.

By using linear response theory, the optical conductivity given as

σμμω=gsωSdteiωtjμt,jμ0, 32

where gs=2 is the spin degeneracy, ω is photon frequency, and S is the 2D planar area.

Using Eq. (32), IOC is given as45,46

σμμinterω=igse22ωSkβkμβkμ[fk,c-fk,vω+ΔE+iη1-fk,c-fk,vω-ΔE+iη1]. 33

where fk,c, and fk,v are Fermi–Dirac distributions in the conduction and valence bands respectively, η1 is the finite damping between the conduction and valence bands, and ΔE=Ec-Ev is the energy difference where Ec and Ev refer to the conduction and valence bands energies respectively and βkμ=k,cjμk,v and βkμ=k,vjμk,c are velocities along the μ and μ-directions.

Low-frequency photons in the THz region (between the microwave and infra-red) have intra-band optical conductivity that plays the main role in their overall optical conductivity. Intra-band transitions are between a special band and, as shown by Eq. (33), c=v and fk,c-fk,v/ΔE must be interpreted as -fk/εj. This means that the Drude-like conductivity described by47 is responsible for most of the low-frequency photon’s optical behavior.

σμμintra=1Sie2ω+iη2kjαkμαkμ-fkεj. 34

Here fk=1/(1+expεj-μ0/kBT) is the Fermi–Dirac distribution, εj is jth eigenvalue, μ0 is the chemical potential, KB is Boltzmann’s constant, T is temperature, and η2 is the broadening width determined by scattering or disorder in the conduction band. In this paper, we considered T= 10 K.

EELS of monolayer h-BP

Another important optical property is the EELS. This quantity shows how the energy of scattered host electrons changes by external perturbation. To calculate EELS, we need the dielectric function which is given by

εμμinterω=εr+iσμμinterωωε0dBP, 35

where εr is the relative permittivity and dBP is the h-BP monolayer thickness which we considered 0.4 nm. So the EELS can be calculated as

Lμμinter=-I1εμμω. 36

So we can calculate EELS along the AC and ZZ directions having optical conductivity.

Discussion

Applying strain to the h-BP changes the bond lengths and hopping parameters and displaces the high symmetry points. The band gap is one of the most important properties of the materials which can be modified by strain. Due to the importance of the band gap and for fitting the tight-binding results with DFT calculations and obtaining the parameters g1 and g2, we compare the band gap variation plot with the results obtained from a recent DFT study44 and obtain the best approximation for g1 and g2. Due to the reporting of different band gaps using DFT and tight-binding methods, we compared the gap variation of the two methods by strain to fit the curves. As we can see in Fig. 4a, for g1=-2.6275 eV and g2=0.37g1 we have a very good match up to 5% stretch. Using these values for g1 and g2, we plotted the changes of the band gap for strain along the AC and ZZ directions and biaxial strain (see Fig. 4b). The most effective method to change the gap is to use biaxial strain so that the minimum and maximum values of the gap for compressive and tensile strain are 1.14 and 1.45 eV respectively. But applying strain along the AC and ZZ directions is not as effective as the biaxial strain, and for strain in these directions, the gap changes are almost similar. It’s important to note that applying strain in the discussed ranges does not cause a phase transition in h-BP. Also, our results are in good agreement with the recent first principle studies44,48.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Comparison of the band gap variation by strain obtained from tight-binding and DFT calculations44. The fitting parameters are g1=EF and g2=0.37EF. (b) Band gap versus compressive and tensile strain along the different directions.

One particularly interesting effect of strain is its ability to change the energy levels of individual atoms. For example, when a material is strained in one direction, it can cause an increase in the on-site energy of certain boron and phosphorus atoms. This phenomenon is clearly seen in Fig. 5, which shows how on-site energies vary with applied strain. As we can see, tensile strain increases the magnitude of the on-site energies, and compressive strains cause to reduce these parameters.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

On-site energies versus compressive and tensile strain for (a) phosphorus and (b) boron atoms.

In addition to the band structure, we can also use the DOS to investigate the strain effects on the electronic phase. We calculated the h-BP partial and total density of states in different strains. Because of the near behavior of the h-BP density of states for applied strains in different directions, we studied only the biaxial strain. From Fig. 6 can be found that the h-BP band gap increases by applying strain. In addition, we can see that the main contribution of two valence band maximum and conduction band minimum comes from the p-orbital of the P and B atoms. Also, our results are in good agreement with the previous study49.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Total and partial density of states of the pristine and strained h-BP. The Fermi level for the pristine case is set at zero.

By knowing the electronic properties of the h-BP, let’s turn to optical conductivity. We will study strain effects on the inter-band and intra-band optical conductivity for light polarized along the x- and y-directions. For low-energy photons, the intra-band optical conductivity plays a major role in determining the material’s optical properties. Because the similarity of the intra-band optical conductivity for light polarized along the x- and y-directions, σyyintra is absent in this work. We can say there is no directional dependence on the intra-band electron transport within the h-BP crystals in the pristine case.

Figure 7 shows real and imaginary parts of the intra-band optical conductivity in the presence of the biaxial strain. Our results show a similarity between the intra-band optical conductivity of the h-BP with graphene and β12-borophene50,51. Applying strain doesn’t shift the plots and only changes the height of the real and imaginary parts. According to Fig. 7, applying tensile strain up to 5% decreases the intra-band optical conductivity, and compressive strain increases the height of the real and imaginary parts.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Real (solid lines) and imaginary (dashed lines) parts of the intra-band optical conductivity for light polarized along the x-direction in the presence of biaxial strain by chemical potentials μc=0.5eV and EF=μc+E(k)..

One particularly promising area of optoelectronics is strain-induced optical modulation. This occurs when an external force is applied to a material that causes it to change shape or size. When this happens, the optical properties of the material also change. If light shines on a strained material, for high-energy photons (higher than THz), the inter-band transitions play a vital role in the optical conductivity. Figure 8a represents the inter-band optical conductivity of the h-BP for light polarized along the x-direction under AC strain. In the pristine case, the inter-band optical conductivity behavior is almost similar to that of graphene5254. The absorption peak in the pristine case locates at the energy of about 4 eV, and applying strain along the AC direction causes two peaks to appear around, and a valley at this energy. Also, by applying strain along the AC direction, the height of the optical conductivity is increased. As represented in Fig. 8b, similar to the AC strain, applying strain along the ZZ direction for both tensile and compressive strains (5%) also causes two peaks, but the locations of the peaks are different. Also, for strains less than 5% (compressive and tensile), we only observe an increase in the height of the plots.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Inter-band optical conductivity for polarized light along the x- (a, b) and y-directions (c, d) in the presence of strain along the AC and ZZ directions respectively.

The inter-band optical conductivity of the h-BP for polarized light along the y-direction (σyyinter) in the pristine case is similar to σxxinter, so there is isotropic behavior in the optical conductivity of the h-BP in the pristine case, However, uniaxial strain changes this isotropy. Figure 8c shows the real part of the inter-band optical conductivity for light polarized along the y-direction under the AC strain. As it’s clear, tensile (compressive) AC strain causes to shift of the absorption peak to the lower (higher) energies, and a redshift (blueshift) occurs. Also, applying strain doesn’t cause two peaks in the optical conductivity in σyyinter. As we can see in Fig. 8d applying strain along the ZZ direction doesn’t shift the peak’s energy and has a little effect on the height of the plots.

Unlike the uniaxial strain, applying the biaxial strain preserves the isotropic behavior of the system, and we have similar behavior in the optical conductivity in different directions. Figure 9 shows this isotropy very well. For the real part of the optical conductivity (Fig. 9a,b) applying tensile strain shifts the plots to the lower energies, and compressive strain causes a blueshift. Also, due to the Kramers–Kronig relation, we have the same behavior in the imaginary parts (see Fig. 9c,d).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Real and imaginary parts of the inter-band optical conductivity for polarized light along the x (a, c) and the y-directions (b, d) in the presence of biaxial strain.

Another optical quantity is EELS. We plotted this quantity versus the photon’s energy under strain along the AC and ZZ directions (see Fig. 10). This feature behavior is almost similar to the real part of the inter-band optical conductivity. This is because we have most energy lost in the absorption energy. Figure 10a and b shows EELS along the xx direction for strain along the AC and ZZ directions respectively. As we can see two peaks appear for both compressive and tensile strains greater than 2%, This is due to the two absorption peaks in Rσxx. EELS of the strained h-BP along the yy direction is different in comparison to the xx direction (see Fig. 10c,d). As it’s clear, for any amount of strain we have only a lost peak almost similar to Rσyy. In addition, EELS along the xx direction is greater than the yy and we have more energy lost in this direction.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

EELS of the perturbed h-BP along the x (a, b) and y directions (c, d) in the presence of the AC and ZZ strain respectively as a function of the photon’s energy.

Conclusions

In summary, due to the deformation in the structure and orbital hybridization of the atoms, both electronic and optical properties can be modified by strain. The electronic and optical properties of the strained h-BP are depended on the direction of the strain. Applying tensile (compressive) strain in both the AC and ZZ directions increases (decreases) the gap and on-site energies. The maximum and minimum of the band for strain in the range of − 5% to 5% is 1.45 eV and 1.14 eV respectively and are related to the biaxial strain. Our calculation for the DOS confirms the results obtained from the band structure. Our results show the similarity between the intra-band optical conductivity of the pristine h-BP with graphene and β12-borophene. Also, the inter-band optical conductivity of the pristine h-BP is isotropic, but applying uniaxial strain causes anisotropic optical conductivity. Also, we have a similar peak location in the EELS in comparison to the inter-band optical conductivity.

Author contributions

There is only one author.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Vogt P, et al. Silicene: Compelling experimental evidence for graphenelike two-dimensional silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;108(15):155501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.155501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li L, et al. Black phosphorus field-effect transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014;9(5):372–377. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mannix AJ, et al. Synthesis of borophenes: Anisotropic, two-dimensional boron polymorphs. Science. 2015;350(6267):1513–1516. doi: 10.1126/science.aad1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Şahin H, et al. Monolayer honeycomb structures of group-IV elements and III–V binary compounds: First-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;80(15):155453. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.155453. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Çakır D, Kecik D, Sahin H, Durgun E, Peeters FM. Realization of ap–n junction in a single layer boron-phosphide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015;17(19):13013–13020. doi: 10.1039/C5CP00414D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zeng B, Li M, Zhang X, Yi Y, Fu L, Long M. First-principles prediction of the electronic structure and carrier mobility in hexagonal boron phosphide sheet and nanoribbons. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120(43):25037–25042. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jiang H, Shyy W, Liu M, Wei L, Wu M, Zhao T. Boron phosphide monolayer as a potential anode material for alkali metal-based batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5(2):672–679. doi: 10.1039/C6TA09264K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yu T-T, Gao P-F, Zhang Y, Zhang S-L. Boron-phosphide monolayer as a potential anchoring material for lithium-sulfur batteries: A first-principles study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019;486:281–286. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang S-F, Wu X-J. First-principles study on electronic and optical properties of graphene-like boron phosphide sheets. Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 2015;28(5):588. doi: 10.1063/1674-0068/28/cjcp1505100. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kumashiro Y, Nakamura K, Enomoto T, Tanaka M. Preparation and thermoelectric properties of BP films on SOI and sapphire substrates. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2011;22:966–973. doi: 10.1007/s10854-010-0245-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yu J, Guo W. Strain tunable electronic and magnetic properties of pristine and semihydrogenated hexagonal boron phosphide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015;106(4):043107. doi: 10.1063/1.4906998. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Padavala B, et al. Epitaxy of boron phosphide on aluminum nitride (0001)/sapphire substrate. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016;16(2):981–987. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01525. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhu Z, Cai X, Niu C, Wang C, Jia Y. Computational prediction of the diversity of monolayer boron phosphide allotropes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016;109(15):153107. doi: 10.1063/1.4964763. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Almayyali AOM, Jappor HR. Prediction of new 2D Hf2Br 2N2 monolayer as a promising candidate for photovoltaic applications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023;294:126979. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126979. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tareq S, Almayyali AOM, Jappor HR. Prediction of two-dimensional AlBrSe monolayer as a highly efficient photocatalytic for water splitting. Surf. Interfaces. 2022;31:102020. doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2022.102020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bafekry A, et al. Theoretical prediction of two-dimensional BC2X (X = N, P, As) monolayers: ab initio investigations. Sci. Rep. 2022;12(1):22269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26805-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen X, et al. Effect of multilayer structure, stacking order and external electric field on the electrical properties of few-layer boron-phosphide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18(24):16229–16236. doi: 10.1039/C6CP01083K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yarmohammadi M, Mirabbaszadeh K. Electric field tuning of the properties of monolayer hexagonal boron phosphide. J. Appl. Phys. 2020;128(21):215703. doi: 10.1063/5.0027632. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang Y, et al. Stress-and electric-field-induced band gap tuning in hexagonal boron phosphide layers. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2019;31(46):465502. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ab36e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mogulkoc Y, Modarresi M, Mogulkoc A, Alkan B. Electronic and optical properties of boron phosphide/blue phosphorus heterostructures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018;20(17):12053–12060. doi: 10.1039/C8CP00994E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Amalia W, Nurwantoro P. Density-functional-theory calculations of structural and electronic properties of vacancies in monolayer hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) Comput. Condens. Matter. 2019;18:e00354. doi: 10.1016/j.cocom.2018.e00354. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen X, et al. Adsorption of formaldehyde molecule on the pristine and transition metal doped graphene: First-principles study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017;396:1020–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Obeid MM, et al. Electronic and magnetic properties of single-layer boron phosphide associated with materials processing defects. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2019;170:109201. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Verberck B, Partoens B, Peeters F, Trauzettel B. Strain-induced band gaps in bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B. 2012;85(12):125403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.125403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wen Y-N, Xia M-G, Zhang S-L. Bandgap engineering of Janus MoSSe monolayer implemented by Se vacancy. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018;152:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Winiarski M, Zasada J, Samsel-Czekała M. Strain effects on electronic structures of monolayer iron sulphide and selenide. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018;142:372–376. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.10.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang X, Wang S. Interfacial strengthening of graphene/aluminum composites through point defects: A first-principles study. Nanomaterials. 2021;11(3):738. doi: 10.3390/nano11030738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ni ZH, Yu T, Lu YH, Wang YY, Feng YP, Shen ZX. Uniaxial strain on graphene: Raman spectroscopy study and band-gap opening. ACS Nano. 2008;2(11):2301–2305. doi: 10.1021/nn800459e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Han Y, et al. Deep elastic strain engineering of 2D materials and their twisted bilayers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022;14(7):8655–8663. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c23431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Roldán R, Castellanos-Gomez A, Cappelluti E, Guinea F. Strain engineering in semiconducting two-dimensional crystals. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2015;27(31):313201. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/27/31/313201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chun S, Choi Y, Park W. All-graphene strain sensor on soft substrate. Carbon. 2017;116:753–759. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tian H, et al. Scalable fabrication of high-performance and flexible graphene strain sensors. Nanoscale. 2014;6(2):699–705. doi: 10.1039/C3NR04521H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Samad YA, Li Y, Alhassan SM, Liao K. Novel graphene foam composite with adjustable sensitivity for sensor applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7(17):9195–9202. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b01608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Banszerus L, et al. Identifying suitable substrates for high-quality graphene-based heterostructures. 2D Materials. 2017;4(2):025030. doi: 10.1088/2053-1583/aa5b0f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gao W, Huang R. Thermomechanics of monolayer graphene: Rippling, thermal expansion and elasticity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 2014;66:42–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.01.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ribeiro R, Pereira VM, Peres N, Briddon P, Neto AC. Strained graphene: Tight-binding and density functional calculations. New J. Phys. 2009;11(11):115002. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/11/115002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Páez C, Ospina R, Bahamon D. An accurate and compact tight-binding model for GeS. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019;1159(1):012008. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1159/1/012008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Po HC, Zou L, Senthil T, Vishwanath A. Faithful tight-binding models and fragile topology of magic-angle bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99(19):195455. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.195455. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Goerbig M. Electronic properties of graphene in a strong magnetic field. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2011;83(4):1193. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1193. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Grosso G, Piermarocchi C. Tight-binding model and interactions scaling laws for silicon and germanium. Phys. Rev. B. 1995;51(23):16772. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.16772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Colombo L. Tight-binding approach to computational materials science. Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 1998;491:221. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bi S, et al. First-principles prediction of the lattice thermal conductivity of two-dimensional (2D) h-BX (X = P, As, Sb) considering the effects of fourth-order and all-order scattering. J. Appl. Phys. 2022;132(11):114301. doi: 10.1063/5.0073473. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Suzuura H, Ando T. Phonons and electron-phonon scattering in carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B. 2002;65(23):235412. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.235412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Galicia-Hernandez JM, Guerrero-Sanchez J, Ponce-Perez R, Fernandez-Escamilla H, Cocoletzi GH, Takeuchi N. Self-energy corrected band-gap tuning induced by strain in the hexagonal boron phosphide monolayer. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2022;203:111144. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.111144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yang C, Zhang J, Wang G, Zhang C. Dependence of the optical conductivity on the uniaxial and biaxial strains in black phosphorene. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;97(24):245408. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.245408. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yarmohammadi M, Nobahari MM, Tien T, Phuong L. Linear interband optical refraction and absorption in strained black phosphorene. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2020;32(46):465301. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/abaad0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kupčić I. Incoherent optical conductivity and breakdown of the generalized Drude formula in quasi-one-dimensional bad metallic systems. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;79(23):235104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.235104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhuang HL, Hennig RG. Electronic structures of single-layer boron pnictides. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012;101(15):153109. doi: 10.1063/1.4758465. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Khossossi N, et al. Hydrogen storage characteristics of Li and Na decorated 2D boron phosphide. Sustain. Energy Fuels. 2020;4(9):4538–4546. doi: 10.1039/D0SE00709A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Peres N, Ferreira A, Bludov YV, Vasilevskiy M. Light scattering by a medium with a spatially modulated optical conductivity: the case of graphene. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2012;24(24):245303. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/24/24/245303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Nobahari MM. Anisotropic Kubo conductivity of electric field-induced monolayer β 12-borophene. RSC Adv. 2022;12(2):648–654. doi: 10.1039/D1RA07945J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nguyen VH, Lherbier A, Charlier J-C. Optical Hall effect in strained graphene. 2D Materials. 2017;4(2):025041. doi: 10.1088/2053-1583/aa5f8b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pellegrino F, Angilella G, Pucci R. Strain effect on the optical conductivity of graphene. Phys. Rev. B. 2010;81(3):035411. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.035411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mak KF, Shan J, Heinz TF. Seeing many-body effects in single-and few-layer graphene: Observation of two-dimensional saddle-point excitons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;106(4):046401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.046401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES