Abstract
The maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais, is a worldwide pest that disproportionately affects subsistence farmers in developing countries. Damage from this pest threatens food security in these communities as widely available and effective control methods are lacking. With advances over the last decade in the development of genetic pest management techniques, addressing pest issues at the ecosystem level as opposed to the farm level may be a possibility. However, pest species selected for genetic management techniques require a well-characterized genome and few genomic tools have been developed for S. zeamais. Here, we have measured the genome size and developed the first genetic linkage map for this species. The genome size was determined using flow cytometry as 682 Mb and 674 Mb for females and males, respectively. The linkage map contains 11 linkage groups, which correspond to the 10 autosomes and 1 X-chromosome found in the species and it contains 1,121 SNPs. This linkage map will be useful for assembling a complete genome for S. zeamais.
Keywords: Maize weevil, Linkage map, Sitophilus, ddRadSeq, Agricultural pest
Introduction
The maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, is a pest of maize and other cereal crops. The exact origin of the species is unknown but is likely from Asia and its worldwide distribution is thought to have been facilitated through grain trade (Corrêa et al., 2017). Despite efforts to control S. zeamais, it remains an important economic pest in the developing world. Subsistence farmers, who store grain for months after harvest, are particularly vulnerable to damage from S. zeamais. In severe infestations, farmers can lose the majority of their grain or be forced to sell in a less favorable market to prevent complete loss of harvest (Stephens & Barrett, 2011). With advances over the last decade in the development of advanced genetic pest management techniques using CRISPR/Cas9, addressing pest issues at the ecosystem level as opposed to the farm level is a possibility (Esvelt et al., 2014). Genetic pest management techniques such as male-selecting transgenic lines or gene drives designed to suppress or replace damaging phenotypes in the population could be used to mitigate pest damage. Some of these techniques are currently being developed in several insect pest species, including Plutella xylostella, Anopheles gambiae, Aedes aegypti, Lucillia cuprina, and others (Harvey-Samuel et al., 2015; Kyrou et al., 2018; Anderson et al., 2023; Yan et al., 2020). It is likely that if these techniques succeed in the field, then they will also be considered for development in other pest species. S. zeamais may be a targeted species because of its widespread geographic distribution and the threat to food security that it poses to subsistence farmers in developing nations (Corrêa et al., 2017; García-Lara, García-Jaimes & Bergvinson, 2019; Baltzegar et al., 2023). However, for genetic-based technologies to be a feasible option for controlling S. zeamais, more species-specific genetic information and tools need to exist.
Few genomic tools are available for use with S. zeamais that would allow for quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), or complex genomic manipulation in the laboratory. The genomic tools that have been developed in this species primarily consist of karyotypes, evolutionary and species-specific diagnostic markers, microsatellite markers, and primer sequences for amplification of specific gene fragments. Several karyotypes have been produced for the species with consensus that S. zeamais has 10 pairs of autosomes and a heterogametic sex chromosome with an Xyp sex-determination mechanism (Smith & Brower, 1974; Zhi-Yua, Pei & Guo-Xiong, 1989; da Silva et al., 2015, 2018). The genome size was reported as 713.5 Mb for females and 709.3 Mb for males with no B chromosomes (da Silva et al., 2018). Interestingly, the occurrence of two types of supernumerary B chromosomes have been found in this species and range from 0 to 6 in individuals (Smith & Brower, 1974; da Silva et al., 2015). The Type I B chromosomes are found in both sexes while the Type II B chromosomes are only found in males. Neither are inherited in a Mendelian fashion (da Silva et al., 2015). Random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), nuclear internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), cytochrome C oxidase subunit I (COI), and cytochrome C oxidase subunit II (COII) PCR primers have been developed to molecularly distinguish S. zeamais from S. oryzae as these two species are almost morphometrically indistinguishable except for the genitalia and are challenging to identify without a microscope (Hidayat, Phillips & Ffrench-Constant, 1996; Peng et al., 2003; Corrêa et al., 2013, 2014). Recently, effort to elucidate the evolutionary history of these two species has been conducted using mitochondrial COI and COII markers and the nuclear ITS marker (Corrêa et al., 2017). The authors found that S. zeamais and S. oryzea diverged approximately 8.7 million years before present. Ndiaye & Sembène (2018) used cytochrome B and COI markers to assess the population genetic structure of S. zeamais populations in West Africa. Although this study identified several common haplotypes, they were not able to identify any phylogeographic patterns associated with their distribution. Similarly, Corrêa et al. (2017) used nine polymorphic microsatellite markers and found very little phylogeographic structure when comparing S. zeamais populations throughout the world. This may indicate a recent geographic expansion of the species, possibly facilitated through global grain trade.
Insecticide resistance is another important area of research for this species and resistance to dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) has been reported since 1970 (Guedes et al., 1995). Resistance to DDT and cross-resistance to pyrethroids was confirmed by Guedes et al. (1995) and although several studies have reported insecticide resistance in various strains of S. zeamais, few studies have investigated the molecular basis of resistance. One study sequenced the region of the voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) gene that encodes domain II of the protein (Araújo et al., 2011). They identified the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) T929I that has been associated with phenotypic resistance to pyrethroids in other arthropod species and developed a TaqMan Assay to genotype individual weevils (Schuler et al., 1998; Lee et al., 2000). The T929I SNP was identified in pyrethroid resistant lab populations, but it was not found at high frequencies in field-collected samples (Araújo et al., 2011; Haddi et al., 2018). Additional PCR primer sequences have been developed for genes of interest including the gene family encoding cysteine proteinases, aldolase, prolactin receptor, and interleukin-1β (Matsumoto et al., 1997; Peng et al., 2003).
Two recent sets of genomic studies have produced transcriptomes and followed up with functional analyses. Huang et al. (2018) compared global transcriptomes of S. zeamais that had either been exposed to Terpinen-4-ol, an active ingredient in tea tree essential oil used as an insecticide, or those that had not been exposed. Then they conducted a functional analysis to identify specific cytochrome p450s involved in the susceptibility of S. zeamais to Terpinen-4-ol (Huang et al., 2020). Tang et al. (2019a) produced an antennal transcriptome and identified 41 candidate odorant binding protein genes. They followed up by utilizing quantitative real-time PCR to compare the expression of odorant receptors in seven different tissues (Tang et al., 2019b). Cytochrome P450s play important roles in insecticide resistance to chemicals, such as the Terpinen-4-ol, while odorant binding proteins and odorant receptors are important because they are used by the insect to identify food sources and potential mates.
Over the last two decades, researchers have put effort into developing basic molecular tools for S. zeamais, but more genomic-level resources are needed if novel, genetic-based pest management techniques are to be considered for mitigating damage from this pest. In the age of next generation sequencing and bioinformatics, researchers are left at a disadvantage if they do not possess basic genome-wide polymorphism data. Therefore, the goals of this research are to (1) confirm the genome size of S. zeamais as this is a necessary parameter required for next generation sequencing, and (2) develop the first genetic linkage map for S. zeamais, which will provide a set of genome-wide SNPs. The high-density radtag linkage map from an F2 population will also be useful during a future genome assembly or quantitative and functional genetic studies that require genome-wide sequence information.
Materials and Methods
Laboratory colonies for genetic linkage map
Sitophilus zeamais colonies were acquired from USDA laboratories in Gainesville, Florida and Manhattan, Kansas. The origin of the colony obtained from Florida is unknown. The origin of the colony obtained from Kansas was the Stored Products Insects Lab, Tifton, GA prior to 1961. An F2 population was generated by mating two siblings from an F1 cross of a single male from the Kansas colony bred to a single female from the Florida colony. Genomic DNA was isolated from the head and thorax of each F2 offspring and the parents and grandparents using the Qiagen DNeasy kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) with an RNase A treatment following an overnight tissue lysis incubation at 55 °C. The breeding individuals and individuals from the F2 generation were used to generate restriction-site associated DNA (RAD) loci following the double-digest restriction-site associated sequencing (ddRadSeq) procedure outlined below.
Genome size estimation
The genome size of S. zeamais was confirmed following the protocol by Hare & Johnston (2011). In brief, neural cells from the heads of one S. zeamais and one Drosophila melanogaster were isolated together and stained with propidium iodide. Relative fluorescence of the stained neural cells was measured on a Becton Dickinson LSRII (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) flow cytometer at the Flow Cytometry Core Facility, NC State University. In total, five male S. zeamais and five female S. zeamais individuals were used as biological replicates. Female and male genome sizes were estimated separately to account for the differences expected from the heterogametic XY chromosomes in this species. The following formula was used to determine the genome size of S. zeamais samples, where Sz = S. zeamais and Dm = D. melanogaster and the genome size for D. melanogaster is 175 Mb (Hare & Johnston, 2011; Bennett et al., 2003). Presence and number of B chromosomes in these individuals was not assessed.
Double-digest restriction-site associated sequencing (ddRadSeq)
Following procedures outlined in Fritz et al. (2016), genomic DNA from individual weevils was digested with Msp1 and EcoRI-HF restriction enzymes and Cutsmart Buffer (New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA) at 37 °C for 3 h. Adapters were ligated onto the sticky ends of the digested material using T4 DNA Ligase (New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA) at 22 °C for 1 h, followed by 65 °C for 30 min. Proper ligation was confirmed via PCR. 5 µl of each sample was pooled into one of five indexed libraries and PCR purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). Prior to preparing individuals for next generation sequencing, we had to first determine the best size selection window. Following the procedure outlined in Peterson et al. (2012), restriction digests for each restriction enzyme used (MspI and EcoRI-HF) were performed independently on gDNA isolated from an individual S. zeamais reared in the laboratory colony. The digest products were then analyzed on a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) using a high sensitivity DNA assay and the electropherograms were examined to determine the proportion of genome that would be sampled in a given fragment size window. Based on these results, a size-selection window of 400–800 bp was chosen with a target fragment size of 600 bp. Each library was then size selected using these criteria on a Blue Pippin Prep (Sage Sciences, Inc., Beverly, MA, USA) electrophoresis platform in the Genomic Sciences Laboratory at NC State University (GSL). Following size-selection, libraries were PCR amplified using primers specific to the corresponding Illumina index. Then, PCR product was pooled and purified two times with a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) and DNA quantity was measured on an Agilent 2200 TapeStation (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) using a Hi-Sensitivity D1000 tape in the GSL. Final library concentrations were diluted to 4 nM and submitted for sequencing on the Illumina Hi-Seq 2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), 125 bp SE in the GSL. Two independent samples with separate barcodes and indices were prepared and sequenced for each parent and grandparent to ensure sufficient coverage for catalog development.
Initial bioinformatic analysis
Illumina sequences were demultiplexed by index and quality checked by FastQC prior to filtering (Andrews, 2010). Sequences were then trimmed to remove over-represented sequences by implementing Trimmomatic v 0.32 (Bolger, Lohse & Usadel, 2014). Trimming was confirmed by FastQC and a MultiQC report containing FastQC data for all indices was generated (Ewels et al., 2016). Then, individual components of the Stacks program were run as follows (Catchen et al., 2013). Process_radtags was first implemented to screen raw reads for quality, demultiplexed by barcode, and truncated to 115 bp. Then, ustacks (−M = 5, −m = 3) was run to identify putative loci, or stacks, from the raw processed radtags. Next, a catalog of loci was built from the concatenated files of the F1 parents using cstacks (−n = 5). The stacks of all individuals were then compared to the catalog in sstacks. Finally, genotypes (−t = cp) was run to produce the output for OneMap.
Genetic linkage map construction
The initial output produced by Stacks for use in OneMap was further filtered by requiring Mendelian inheritance and ~96% (100 out of 104) of individuals to be genotyped for each marker. Mendelian inheritance was confirmed with a Chi-Square test. A genetic linkage map was constructed in R (R Core Team, 2020) with the onemap package using the Kosambi mapping function and the Record function to order the markers (Margarido, Souza & Garcia, 2007). An SVG image file containing a visual representation of the linkage map was initially produced with genetic_mapper.pl and edited for visual clarity in Adobe Illustrator (Bekaert, 2016). The breeding cross implemented did not allow for mapping of Y-chromosome markers because only one male was used to initiate the crosses.
Results
Breeding results
One female from the Florida colony was crossed with one male from the Kansas colony. Twelve sibling pairs from the F1 offspring were mated together and the pair that produced the largest number of F2 progeny was chosen for sequencing. A total of 108 F2 individuals and the parents and grandparents were used for further analysis.
Genome size estimation
The genome size of S. zeamais was estimated by comparing the relative florescence of stained neural tissue from an unknown strain of D. melanogaster to stained neural tissue from S. zeamais (Table 1). Genome size was estimated for males and females separately since the species is heterogametic. The meioformula has been reported as n = 10 + XX for females and n = 10 + Xyp for males (da Silva et al., 2015, 2018). A total of five females were measured and the average haploid genome size was 682 Mb (SE +/− 1.7). Additionally, five males were measured, but only four were used to estimate the genome size because the D. melanogaster control for one individual failed to stain and fluoresce. Males had an average genome size of 674 Mb (SD +/− 7.0). The medians were 681 Mb and 680 Mb for females and males, respectively (Fig. 1). We note that B chromosomes vary among individuals of the species, and may confound size estimates of the standard karyotype.
Table 1. Flow cytometry data.
Sex of maize weevil, relative fluorescence of the standard (female Drosophila melanogaster), and the relative fluorescence of the experimental Sitophilus zeamais are recorded.
| Sample | Sex | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Female | 22,617 | 88,682 |
| 2 | Female | 22,233 | 86,517 |
| 3 | Female | 22,521 | 87,448 |
| 4 | Female | 22,508 | 88,209 |
| 5 | Female | 22,769 | 88,190 |
| 6 | Male | 21,904 | 85,452 |
| 7 | Male | 22,720 | 84,823 |
| 8 | Male | 22,013 | 85,215 |
| 9 | Male | 22,203 | 86,663 |
Figure 1. Boxplot of genome size for male and female Sitophilus zeamais.
The mean, represented by the open diamonds, is 682 Mb (s.d. = 3.8) and 674 Mb (s.d. = 14.1) for females and males, respectively. The median for females is 681 Mb and the median for males is 680 Mb.
Linkage map
The map was produced using ddRadSeq markers (radtags) from the F1 parents and 104 of the 108 F2 progeny because four individuals failed to produce an adequate number of sequencing reads. The average number of reads per progeny used in the analysis was 914,379. The average number of reads of the four excluded samples was 5,910. The lowest number of reads per individual for the retained samples was 315,155. The number of reads for the male and female parents were 965,533 and 960,524 respectively.
A set of 5,992 radtags were exported from the Stacks populations pipeline and filtered based on Mendelian inheritance and number of individuals genotyped per radtag. Radtags that did not meet Mendelian inheritance based on a chi-squared test and radtags that were not present in 100 out of 104 offspring were removed. A final set of 1,123 radtags with sequence length of 116 bp was used to produce the linkage map (Fig. 2). The map was made using a LOD score of 11, which generated 11 linkage groups using 1,121 radtags (Table S1). Two radtags did not map to any linkage group. The total map length was 1,421.47 cM and linkage groups ranged in size from 70.69 cM to 225.87 cM (Table 2). There were an average of 101.9 markers per linkage group (range: 29–235) with an average spacing of 1.45 cM between markers. The linkage map with LOD score of 11 was chosen because it produced the map with the highest LOD score that contained 11 chromosomes, which best corresponds to the karyotype of 10 autosomes and 1 X-chromosome (Smith & Brower, 1974; Zhi-Yua, Pei & Guo-Xiong, 1989; da Silva et al., 2015, 2018). By lowering the LOD threshold to six all 1,123 radtags could be incorporated into a map. That map contained 11 linkage groups and had a total map length of 1,470.53 cM. But, this map was not chosen as the lower LOD score provides less confidence in the overall linkage map.
Figure 2. Linkage map.
Each linkage group is represented by a black bar and is numbered at the top. The distance (cM) for each linkage group is listed at the bottom and each marker is represented by a tick mark to the right side of the linkage groups.
Table 2. Linkage map summary statistics.
A table showing the number of markers, the average distance between markers in cM, and the total length in cM of each linkage group.
| Linkage group | Num markers | Length (cM) | Mean distance (cM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 119 | 126.47 | 1.06 |
| 2 | 68 | 89.21 | 1.31 |
| 3 | 162 | 217.67 | 1.34 |
| 4 | 65 | 93.5 | 1.44 |
| 5 | 235 | 225.87 | 0.96 |
| 6 | 59 | 118.38 | 2.01 |
| 7 | 99 | 104.58 | 1.06 |
| 8 | 173 | 201.54 | 1.16 |
| 9 | 66 | 89.49 | 1.36 |
| 10 | 46 | 84.07 | 1.83 |
| 11 | 29 | 70.69 | 2.44 |
Discussion
S. zeamais is a worldwide pest that disproportionately affects subsistence farmers in developing countries. Damage from this pest threatens food security in these communities as widely available and effective control methods are lacking. With the revolution of genetic pest management, the potential to control this species at an ecosystem scale, which could reduce the cost burden on farmers, may be possible (Esvelt et al., 2014; Baltzegar et al., 2018). However, achieving this technical goal requires sophisticated genomic tools, very few of which currently exist for S. zeamais. Here, we have measured the genome size and developed the first genetic linkage map for this species.
Knowledge of an organism’s genome size is a necessary parameter for many sequencing projects because this value allows for proper experimental design to obtain sufficient sequencing coverage. The haploid genome size was estimated using the gold standard method of comparing relative fluorescence measured via flow cytometry as 682 Mb and 674 Mb for females and males, respectively. This is somewhat smaller than the 713.5 Mb (females) and 709.3 Mb (males) previously reported (da Silva et al., 2018). Genome size varies naturally within different lines of D. melanogaster (Huang et al., 2014). Therefore, the difference in genome size here compared to the previous study may be accounted for by a difference in the accuracy of the estimated genome size used for controls. Also, the previous study used Drosophila virilis instead of D. melanogaster as a reference (da Silva et al., 2018). D. melanogaster has a smaller genome size than D. virilis. Its use as a standard in this study may have contributed to an underestimate in the genome size of S. zeamais due to the greater difference between the control and experimental samples and the nonlinearity inherent in flow cytometry analysis. Another possibility is that there exists a difference in the number of B chromosomes between sampled individuals in this study as compared to the previous. Supernumerary chromosomes are known to vary between populations as well as among individuals in S. zeamais (da Silva et al., 2015). The status of B chromosomes in the individuals used in this study is unknown. There were no B chromosomes in the line used for the original study (da Silva et al., 2018). Therefore, the difference in B chromosome presence is unlikely to account for the smaller size measured here. Future studies may consider using an average of the published genome sizes, especially if the status of B chromosomes in the population is unknown.
The linkage map contains 1,121 radtags segregating in a Mendelian fashion between two laboratory S. zeamais colonies. The map was resolved into 11 linkage groups, which correspond to the 10 autosomes and 1 X-chromosome found in the species. Future work should examine the Y-chromosome as some promising genetic pest management strategies rely on creating a male-biased population.
Although basic molecular tools exist for S. zeamais, the creation of a linkage map is an advancement in the development of modern genomic tools for the species. The linkage map will be a useful tool when assembling a genome. And, a completely sequenced and assembled genome will aid researchers by expanding the types of genetic manipulation and research questions that may be addressed. This linkage map also provides the necessary genome-wide sequence information required to perform quantitative trait loci (QTL) analyses and genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Both QTL and GWAS could be used to identify useful phenotypic traits that may be targeted for future pest control methods.
Conclusions
Development of genomic tools for S. zeamais may aid researchers in developing ecosystem wide genetic-based management solutions. This study measures the genome size and creates the first genetic linkage map for this species. The linkage map will be useful for assembling a complete genome sequence for this pest species and for providing the first set of genome-wide sequence data for QTL and GWAS studies.
Supplemental Information
The sequence of each SNP contained in the linkage map is listed with its ID, linkage group (LG), and position (POS) on the linkage group.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Nicole Gutzmann Martin, Destiny Tyson, and Laura Welsh for valuable laboratory assistance.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a National Science Foundation IGERT award (No. 1068676). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Jennifer Fountain Baltzegar conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Fred Gould conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The sequence data is available at Zenodo and BioProject: PRJNA910170; Baltzegar, Jennifer, & Gould, Fred. (2022). ddRadSeq sequences for Sitophilus zeamais [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7087665
The code is available at Zenodo: Jennifer Baltzegar. (2022). jenbaltzegar/Sz_linkagemap: v1.0.0 (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7086594.
References
- Anderson et al. (2023).Anderson MAE, Gonzalez E, Ang JXD, Shackleford L, Nevard K, Verkuijl SAN, Edgington MP, Harvey-Samuel T, Alphey L. Closing the gap to effective gene drive in Aedes aegypti by exploiting germline regulatory elements. Nature Communications. 2023;14(338):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36029-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andrews (2010).Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2010. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
- Araújo et al. (2011).Araújo RA, Williamson MS, Bass C, Field LM, Duce IR. Pyrethroid resistance in Sitophilus zeamais is associated with a mutation (T929I) in the voltage-gated sodium channel. Insect Molecular Biology. 2011;20(4):437–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2011.01079.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baltzegar et al. (2018).Baltzegar J, Barnes JC, Elsensohn JE, Gutzmann N, Jones MS, King S, Sudweeks J. Anticipating complexity in the deployment of gene drive insects in agriculture. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 2018;5(S1):S81–S97. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1407910. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Baltzegar et al. (2023).Baltzegar J, Jones MS, Willcox M, Ramsey J, Gould F. Population genetic structure of the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais, in southern Mexico. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(4):e0264469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bekaert (2016).Bekaert M. Genetic-Mapper: vectorial genetic map drawer. Poster session presented at Aquaculture Europe 2016. 2016. https://f1000research.com/posters/5-1301 p. 1.https://f1000research.com/posters/5-1301
- Bennett et al. (2003).Bennett MD, Leitch IJ, Price HJ, Johnston JS. Comparisons with Caenorhabditis (100 Mb) and Drosophila (175 Mb) using flow cytometry show genome size in Arabidopsis to be 157 Mb and thus 25% Larger than the Arabidopsis genome initiative estimate of 125 Mb. Annals of Botany. 2003;91(5):547–557. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcg057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolger, Lohse & Usadel (2014).Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Catchen et al. (2013).Catchen J, Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Amores A, Cresko WA. Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Molecular Ecology. 2013;22(11):3124–3140. doi: 10.1111/mec.12354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corrêa et al. (2013).Corrêa AS, de Oliveira LO, Braga LS, Guedes RNC. Distribution of the related weevil species Sitophilus oryzae and S. zeamais in Brazil. Insect Science. 2013;20(6):763–770. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01559.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corrêa et al. (2014).Corrêa AS, Tome HVV, Braga LS, Martins GF, de Oliveira LO, Guedes RNC. Are mitochondrial lineages, mitochondrial lysis and respiration rate associated with phosphine susceptibility in the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais? Annals of Applied Biology. 2014;165(1):137–146. doi: 10.1111/aab.12127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Corrêa et al. (2017).Corrêa AS, Vinson CC, Braga LS, Guedes RNC, de Oliveira LO. Ancient origin and recent range expansion of the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais, and its genealogical relationship to the rice weevil S. oryzae. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 2017;107(1):9–20. doi: 10.1017/S0007485316000687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- da Silva et al. (2018).da Silva AA, Braga LS, Corrêa AS, Holmes VR, Johnston JS, Oppert B, Guedes RNC, Tavares MG. Comparative cytogenetics and derived phylogenic relationship among Sitophilus grain weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Dryophthorinae) Comparative Cytogenetics. 2018;12(2):223–245. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v12i2.26412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- da Silva et al. (2015).da Silva AA, Braga LS, Guedes RNC, Tavares MG. Cytogenetic analyses using C-banding and DAPI/CMA3 staining of four populations of the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, 1855 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) Comparative Cytogenetics. 2015;9(1):89–102. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v9i1.4611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Esvelt et al. (2014).Esvelt KM, Smidler AL, Catteruccia F, Church GM. Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations. eLife. 2014;2014(3):e03401. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ewels et al. (2016).Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(19):3047–3048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fritz et al. (2016).Fritz ML, Paa S, Baltzegar J, Gould F. Application of a dense genetic map for assessment of genomic responses to selection and inbreeding in Heliothis virescens. Insect Molecular Biology. 2016;25(4):385–400. doi: 10.1111/imb.12234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- García-Lara, García-Jaimes & Bergvinson (2019).García-Lara S, García-Jaimes E, Bergvinson DJ. Mapping of maize storage losses due to insect pests in central Mexico. Journal of Stored Products Research. 2019;84:101529. doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2019.101529. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guedes et al. (1995).Guedes RNC, Lima JOG, Santos JP, Cruz CD. Resistance to DDT and pyrethroids in Brazilian populations of Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Journal of Stored Products Research. 1995;31(2):145–150. doi: 10.1016/0022-474X(94)00043-S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Haddi et al. (2018).Haddi K, Valbon WR, Jumbo LOV, de Oliveira LO, Guedes RNC, Oliveira EE. Diversity and convergence of mechanisms involved in pyrethroid resistance in the stored grain weevils, Sitophilus spp. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(16361):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34513-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hare & Johnston (2011).Hare EE, Johnston JS. Genome size determination using flow cytometry of propidium iodide-stained nuclei. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2011;772:3–12. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-228-1_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harvey-Samuel et al. (2015).Harvey-Samuel T, Morrison NI, Walker AS, Marubbi T, Yao J, Collins HL, Gorman K, Davies TGE, Alphey N, Warner S, Shelton AM, Alphey L. Pest control and resistance management through release of insects carrying a male-selecting transgene. BMC Biology. 2015;13:49. doi: 10.1186/s12915-015-0161-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hidayat, Phillips & Ffrench-Constant (1996).Hidayat P, Phillips TW, Ffrench-Constant RH. Molecular and morphological characters discriminate Sitophilus oryzae and S. zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and confirm reproductive isolation. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 1996;89(5):645–652. doi: 10.1093/aesa/89.5.645. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huang et al. (2020).Huang Y, Liao M, Yang Q, Shi S, Xiao J, Cao H. Knockdown of NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase and CYP6MS1 increases the susceptibility of Sitophilus zeamais to terpinen-4-ol. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2020;162:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang et al. (2018).Huang Y, Liao M, Yang Q, Xiao J, Hu Z, Zhou L, Can H. Transcriptome profiling reveals differential gene expression of detoxification enzymes in Sitophilus zeamais responding to terpinen-4-ol fumigation. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2018;149:44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2018.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang et al. (2014).Huang W, Massouras A, Inoue Y, Peiffer J, Ramia M, Tarone A, Turlapati L, Zichner T, Zhu D, Lyman R, Magwire MM, Blankenburg K, Carbone MA, Chang K, Ellis LL, Fernandez S, Han Y, Highnam G, Hjelmen CE, Jack JR, Javaid M, Jayaseelan J, Kalra D, Lee S, Lewis L, Munidasa M, Ongeri F, Patel S, Perales L, Perez A, Pu L, Rollmann SM, Ruth R, Saada N, Warner C, Williams A, Wu Y-Q, Yamamoto A, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Anholt RRH, Korbel JO, Mittelman D, Muzny DM, Gibbs RA, Barbadilla A, Johnston JS, Stone EA, Richards S, Deplancke B, Mackay TFC. Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel lines. Genome Research. 2014;24(7):1193–1208. doi: 10.1101/gr.171546.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kyrou et al. (2018).Kyrou K, Hammond AM, Galizi R, Kranjc N, Burt A, Beaghton AK, Nolan T, Crisanti A. A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Nature Biotechnology. 2018;36(11):1062–1066. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee et al. (2000).Lee SH, Yoon KS, Williamson MS, Goodson SJ, Takano-Lee M, Edman JD, Devonshire AL, Clark JM. Molecular analysis of kdr-like resistance in permethrin-resistant strains of head lice, Pediculus capitis. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2000;66(2):130–143. doi: 10.1006/pest.1999.2460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Margarido, Souza & Garcia (2007).Margarido GRA, Souza AP, Garcia AAF. OneMap: software for genetic mapping in outcrossing species. Hereditas. 2007;144(3):78–79. doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0018-0661.02000.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsumoto et al. (1997).Matsumoto I, Emori T, Abe K, Arai S. Characterization of a gene family encoding cysteine proteinases of Sitophilus zeamais (Maize Weevil), and analysis of the protein distribution in various tissues including alimentary tract and germ cells. Journal of Biochemistry. 1997;121(3):464–476. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ndiaye & Sembène (2018).Ndiaye MR, Sembène M. Genetic structure and phylogeographic evolution of the West African populations of Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) Journal of Stored Products Research. 2018;77:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2018.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peng et al. (2003).Peng WK, Lin HC, Chen CN, Wang CH. DNA identification of two laboratory colonies of the weevils, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and S. zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Taiwan. Journal of Stored Products Research. 2003;39(2):225–235. doi: 10.1016/S0022-474X(01)00056-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson et al. (2012).Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE. Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for De Novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(5):e37135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team (2020).R Core Team . Vienna, Austria: 2020. R foundation for statistical computing. [Google Scholar]
- Schuler et al. (1998).Schuler TH, Martinez-Torres D, Thompson AJ, Denholm I, Devonshire AL, Duce IR, Williamson MS. Toxicological, electrophysiological, and molecular characterization of knock-down resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 1998;59(3):169–182. doi: 10.1006/pest.1998.2320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Smith & Brower (1974).Smith SG, Brower JH. Chromosome numbers of stored-product Coleoptera. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 1974;47(3):317–328. [Google Scholar]
- Stephens & Barrett (2011).Stephens EC, Barrett CB. Incomplete credit markets and commodity marketing behaviour. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2011;62(1):1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00274.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tang et al. (2019a).Tang QF, Shen C, Zhang Y, Yang ZP, Han R, Wang J. Antennal transcriptome analysis of the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais: identification and tissue expression profiling of candidate odorant-binding protein genes. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology. 2019a;101(1):e21542. doi: 10.1002/arch.21542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang et al. (2019b).Tang Q, Zhang Y, Shen C, Xia D. Identification and expression profiling of odorant receptor protein genes in Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) using RT-qPCR. Neotropical Entomology. 2019b;48(17):538–551. doi: 10.1007/s13744-019-00671-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan et al. (2020).Yan Y, Williamson ME, Davis RJ, Andere AA, Picard CJ, Scott MJ. Improved transgenic sexing strains for genetic control of the Australian sheep blow fly Lucilia cuprina using embryo-specific gene promoters. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2020;295:287–298. doi: 10.1007/s00438-019-01622-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhi-Yua, Pei & Guo-Xiong (1989).Zhi-Yua Y, Pei H, Guo-Xiong W. Observation on the Karyotypes of Sitophilus Oryzae and Sitophilus Zeamais and their hybrid offsprings. Acta Entomologica Sinica. 1989;32(4):406–409. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
The sequence of each SNP contained in the linkage map is listed with its ID, linkage group (LG), and position (POS) on the linkage group.
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The sequence data is available at Zenodo and BioProject: PRJNA910170; Baltzegar, Jennifer, & Gould, Fred. (2022). ddRadSeq sequences for Sitophilus zeamais [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7087665
The code is available at Zenodo: Jennifer Baltzegar. (2022). jenbaltzegar/Sz_linkagemap: v1.0.0 (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7086594.


