Amar Alwitry and Roger Holden, the authors of the picture story about a patient with a visual field defect that was thought to be caused by excessive upper eyelid skin but was in fact secondary to an intraocular tumour (23 February, p 494), were unhappy with the tone of the text that accompanied their picture. The problem arose because the BMJ did not receive the correct wording. The authors apologise for any offence caused and have since supplied us with the version they intended us to use; this can be read at www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/324/7335/494#20395l
