Abstract
Functional photoacoustic imaging is a promising biological imaging technique that offers such unique benefits as scalable resolution and imaging depth, as well as the ability to provide functional information. At nanoscale, photoacoustic imaging has provided super-resolution images of the surface light absorption characteristics of materials and of single organelles in cells. At the microscopic and macroscopic scales. photoacoustic imaging techniques have precisely measured and quantified various physiological parameters, such as oxygen saturation, vessel morphology, blood flow, and the metabolic rate of oxygen, in both human and animal subjects. This comprehensive review provides an overview of functional photoacoustic imaging across multiple scales, from nano to macro, and highlights recent advances in technology developments and applications. Finally, the review surveys the future prospects of functional photoacoustic imaging in the biomedical field.
Keywords: Biomedical imaging, Photoacoustic imaging, Ultrasound imaging, Functional photoacoustic imaging, Multiscale photoacoustic imaging
Introduction
In the biomedical field, optical characterization of cells and tissues is a valuable tool for understanding physiological mechanisms. Current biomedical optical imaging techniques include fluorescence imaging [1], confocal microscopy [2], optical coherence tomography [3], two-photon microscopy [4], near-infrared spectroscopy [5], and diffuse optical tomography [6]. These techniques have significantly advanced biomedical technology and are widely used for both preclinical and clinical purposes. However, the strong optical scattering within turbid biological tissues fundamentally limits the imaging depth of these pure optical imaging techniques to no deeper than the optical ballistic depth (< 1 mm). Thus, their observation depth is superficial and other imaging modalities are needed to explore deeper layers of biological tissue [7].
Photoacoustic imaging (PAI), a promising biomedical technique, achieves superior imaging depths by forming images from optically-derived acoustic signals, which inherently attenuate less than optical signals in biological tissue [8–10]. PAI is based on the photoacoustic (PA) effect, in which energy is converted from light to acoustic waves via thermoelastic expansion [11–16]. To generate PA waves, a laser beam with a typical pulse width of a few nanoseconds illuminates the target tissue. The optical chromophores in biological tissue absorb the light energy and then release the energy soon after. The energy release can can occur as either light energy with a slightly shifted wavelength or as thermal energy that causes thermoelastic expansion. In PAI, the rapidly alternating thermoelastic expansion and contraction caused by pulsed light illumination generates vibrations in tissue that propagate as acoustic waves called PA waves. The generated PA waves can be detected by conventional ultrasound (US) transducers for image generation. Because PAI and ultrasound imaging (USI) share the same signal reception and image reconstruction principle, the two modalities are technically fully compatible and can be implemented in a single US imaging platform accompanied with pulse laser source [17–21]. Since PAI can capture the photochemical properties of the target site, combining PAI with USI can provide both chemical and structural information about a target tissue.
One distinctive advantage of PAI is that its resolution and imaging depth can be adjusted to suit a specific target area. The resolution of PA signals depends on both the optical focus of the excitation laser and the acoustic focus of the receiving US transducer [22], so images with tuned spatial resolutions and imaging depths can be achieved by modifying the system configuration [23]. PAI’s wide applications to date have included nanoscale surface and organelle imaging [24–28], microscale cellular imaging [29–32], macroscale small animal imaging [33–35], and clinical human imaging [36–38]. Preclinical PAI studies have investigated metabolic changes in the ear [39], eye [40–42], and brain [43–45], and have examined exogenous contrast agents [46–51], drug delivery monitoring [52–54], image-guided therapy [55–57], and phototherapy [58–60]. Human clinical PAI studies have focused on cancers of the thyroid [61–64], breast [65–69], prostate [70, 71], and skin [72–75], and on peripheral vascular system [76–78].
In a step beyond observing the appearance of biological tissue, systemic analysis of sequentially acquired PA images can identify additional useful functional biomarkers. For example, in optically characterizing chromophores, the pixel intensity of PAI is basically proportional to the local concentration, so PAI readily visualizes the morphology of a lesion rich with a target chromophore. Technical advances such as faster laser pulse rates, wavelength-tunable laser sources, and faster scanning schemes have enabled the acquisition of sequential PA images at high frame rates. With this capability, PAI has the potential to sensitively capture undiscovered metabolic changes in a living body. By analyzing the sequentially acquired PAI images, secondary functional biomarkers such as local tissue composition, blood flow, and metabolic or neural activity can be quantified and spatially mapped as functional images. Ultimately, depending on the photophysical or photochemical changes of the target chromophore, we will be able to better comprehend the molecular or functional information of biological tissues in vivo [79–81].
In this review, we briefly discuss the features of multiscale and functional photoacoustic imaging (fPAI). We then provide a comprehensive overview of the latest developments in fPAI at different scales, ranging from nanoscale to microscale and macroscale. Next, we classify fPAI studies according to these scales, so readers can readily identify appropriate potential applications for each scale. This approach will encourage readers to explore PAI research further, promoting additional advances.
Multiscalability and functionality of photoacoustic imaging
Multiscale photoacoustic imaging
PAI uses optical excitation and acoustic detection, so its resolution can be either optically or acoustically determined, depending on the desired penetration depth (Fig. 1a). There are two main implementations of PAI [7, 88]: optical-resolution PAI and acoustic-resolution PAI. Optical-resolution PAI (i.e., optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy, OR-PAM) can achieve high lateral resolution through fine optical focusing within the optical diffusion limit. The lateral resolution of OR-PAM is limited by optical diffraction, and can reach cellular and sub-cellular levels. Originally, OR-PAM had a lateral resolution of around 5 µm and an imaging depth of around 1 mm [89–92]. The lateral resolution has since been improved to around 220 nm (i.e., sub-wavelength photoacoustic microscopy, SW-PAM), allowing single red blood cells to be imaged [82, 93]. Nonlinear label-free PA nanoscopy has pushed the limits of OR-PAM further, achieving a lateral resolution of around 88 nm and a sub-µm axial resolution [25]. Furthermore, labeling the samples could potentially lead to further improvements in lateral resolution. With these improvements, OR-PAM has become widely applied in fields such as neurology [94, 95], vascular biology [96], dermatology [97, 98], and ophthalmology [99, 100].
Despite the fact that a series of OR-PAM instruments have garnered attention for their ability to achieve lateral resolutions beyond the optical diffraction limit, their restricted imaging depth has highlighted the constraints of optically-based imaging. Consequently, acoustic-resolution PAI is used for deep tissue imaging, taking advantage of its acoustically determined spatial resolutions [7]. It can be performed through raster scanning with a weakly focused optical illumination and a spherically focused US transducer (i.e., acoustic-resolution photoacoustic microscopy, AR-PAM) or by using wide-field optical illumination and parallel acoustic detection with an US transducer array (i.e., photoacoustic computed tomography, PACT). The spatial resolution and imaging depth of acoustic-resolution PAI are highly scalable with the US frequency, with lower frequencies achieving deeper penetration but lower resolution [7]. Typical lateral resolution and image depth values for AR-PAM are 20–50 µm and ~ 5 mm. The lateral resolution of PACT using an array-type transducer is 100–400 µm, and the image depth is ~ 8 cm. Photoacoustic macroscopy (PAMac) is a system that can bridge the gap between AR-PAM and PACT. As with AR-PAM, a single-element transducer is used for PAMac. Acoustic-resolution PAI has been successful in deep tissue imaging, such as small animal whole-body imaging [38], human breast cancer detection [101], melanoma stage analysis [72], and thyroid cancer screening [62, 64].
Functional photoacoustic imaging
The fPAI technique can measure various functional parameters in biological tissues, including the concentration of hemoglobin (HbT) [102, 103], SO2 [17, 104, 105] and blood flow [106, 107], in addition to vessel morphology and the metabolic rate of oxygen (MRO2) [108, 109]. These parameters can be roughly subdivided into two categories: local molecular composition parameters, and blood flowmetry or vessel morphology. Since each chromophore in biological tissue has a distinctive PA absorption spectrum within the NIR region, a distribution map of any given chromophore can be calculated by processing a series of PA images acquired via multiwavelength excitation (Fig. 2a) [110–112]. For instance, oxygenated hemoglobin and reduced hemoglobin can be distinguished by spectral unmixing, and the composition ratio of the two can directly enable calculating the oxygen saturation level and be used to distinguish arteries from veins.
Blood vessels are frequent targets of PAI, which can capture their morphology and blood flow features (Fig. 2b). Structural parameters such as vessel density [76, 113, 114], vessel diameter [113, 115], and vessel tortuosity [116–118] contribute to understanding the metabolic change and angiogenetic progression of a diseased organ or of carcinogenesis [119]. Further, blood flow can also be measured by observing PA signal fluctuations in sequential images acquired at a high frame rate [120, 121].
Dysfunctions in oxygen metabolism have been linked to various life-threatening diseases, and PA methods are ideal for imaging oxygen-metabolism in vivo. In particular, fPAI has proven valuable in diagnosing and evaluating cancerous tumors. For instance, Kim et al. utilized functional PAI to calculate the HbT and SO2 levels in the thyroid nodules of 52 patients (23 malignant cases and 29 benign cases), achieving 83% sensitivity and a 93% specificity in differentiating benign and malignant nodules [62]. As Fig. 1, illustrated, functional PAI is now used to image breast cancers [66, 101, 122, 123], prostate cancer [124–126], and melanoma [72, 73], and also diseases affecting the lymphatic system [127–129], brain [130–132], blood vessels [36, 37], and musculoskeletal system [133–135].
Advances in functional photoacoustic imaging at different scales
Nanoscale photoacoustic imaging, from the surface to organelles
Researchers are actively applying the strong light absorption contrast of PA to functional PA nanoscopy. As one example, the photoactivated atomic force microscopy (pAFM) presented by our group has demonstrated super-resolution capabilities, achieving a resolution of ~ 8 nm (Fig. 3a, b) [28]. In pAFM, which combines atomic force microscopy and a visible-range pulse laser, the sample is thermally expanded by the laser and induces vibration in the cantilever tip. The magnitude of this vibration is converted into an electrical signal called a pAFM signal. Super-resolution imaging of gold nanospheres, gold nanowires, and single cells has been achieved using this method. The functionality of pAFM was also demonstrated through the simultaneous acquisition of both height and phase information of samples (Fig. 3b). Our group has made an interesting contribution to the improvement of pAFM by applying a dual pulse mechanism [24]. This approach increases the SNR of pAFM by nonlinearly expanding the sample's thermal expansion by the irradiating it with two laser pulses separated by a nanosecond interval. This technique increases the vibration of the cantilever tip and a correspondingly increases the pAFM signal and SNR (Fig. 3c). In this study, nano cracks in organic semiconductors were clearly observed, which pose significant challenges for the semiconductor industry (Fig. 3d). Continued research on pAFM is contributing greatly to the development of super-resolution microscopes utilizing PA effects. A similar technology, atomic force microscopy-based infrared spectroscopy (AFM-IR) uses a visible wavelength laser to observe cells or organic semiconductors, AFM-IR uses an infrared laser to provide chemical analysis and compositional mapping with super resolution [136].
However, because pAFM or AFM-IR indirectly measures the PA effect in the sample through a cantilever tip, errors can be introduced by probe defects. Our group has presented a solution to the probe defect issue in a study on near-field scanning photoacoustic microscopy (NSPM) [27]. NSPM directly acquires PA signals by bringing a tapered optical fiber to within a few nm of the sample surface, without the use of a lens (Fig. 3e). Simulations confirmed the generation of evanescent waves at near fields, and experimental results showed the acquisition of near-field PA images of micro-scale gold lattice. NSPM provides the ability to simultaneously acquire not only light absorption information but also height information to analyze the morphological characteristics of a sample (Fig. 3f). This preliminary study represents a significant step towards the development of a super-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (SR-PAM).
The imaging techniques discussed thus far, which enable near fieldsuper-resolution PAI, are useful only for a restricted area, such as the sample surface. Achieving far field super-resolution PAI can crucially broaden the range of samples that can be studied. Several efforts have been made to visualize biological tissues with a far-field super-resolution microscope using nonlinear mechanisms. Yao et al. proposed a new imaging technique, called photoimprint photoacoustic microscopy (PI-PAM), which uses a dual-pulse excitation to improve resolution [26]. In this technique, the first excitation pulse generates a PA signal throughout the entire excitation volume. However, due to the uneven illumination of the Gaussian beam, more absorbers in the central region are bleached than those in the peripheral region. During the second excitation pulse, molecules in the bleached central area have reduced absorption and generate a smaller PA signal than in the first excitation. The difference between the two signals is nonlinear to the excitation energy and represents the signal contribution from mainly the central focal area. This method improved both lateral and axial resolution (Fig. 4a). In particular, the lateral resolution was improved by a factor of , where is the photobleaching rate for excitation intensity. They demonstrated the effectiveness of PI-PAM by imaging live rose petal epidermal cells at 570 nm. Compared to conventional PAM, PI-PAM showed the cells more clearly (Fig. 4b). In other work, Danielli et al. reported PA nanoscopy utilizing nonlinear thermal expansion and optical absorption saturation [25]. Notably, the optical absorption coefficient saturates at higher optical fluence levels, providing nonlinear PA signals. High-order nonlinear PA images can be created by using an optical pulse train with different energies that hit the same target, improving the lateral resolution by a factor compared to conventional PAM (Fig. 4c). To demonstrate these high-order PA images, they simulated a Gaussian illumination of 226 nm and two 5 nm diameter targets located 90 nm apart. The third-order PA coefficient clearly distinguished the two targets (Fig. 4d). In addition, the PA nanoscopy technique was then applied to image a single mitochondrion, demonstrating superior image quality, with 88-nm lateral resolution, compared to conventional PAM (Figs. 4e, f). All studies reviewed in this section are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Ref. | System scale | Functionality and application | Transducer | Laser | Lateral resolution | Imaging depth | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
f (MHz) | Element | PRF | Wavelength (nm) | |||||
[28] | SR-PAM | Nanoscale imaging, phase, topography | – | – | 2 k | 532 | 8 nm | Surface |
[24] | SR-PAM | Nano crack identification | – | – | 2 k | 532 | 8 nm | Surface |
[27] | OR-PAM | Microscale imaging, topography | 35 | 1 | 1 k | 532 | 1 μm | Surface |
[25] | SR-PAM | Single mitochondria, cells | 40 MHz | 1 | 2.35 k | 532 | 88 nm | Cellular |
[26] | SR-PAM | Single cells | 40 MHz | 1 | – | 532 | 120 nm | Cellular |
f, center frequency; PRF, pulse repetition frequency; OR-PAM, optical-resolution photoacoustic microscope; SR-PAM, super-resolution photoacoustic microscope; k, kHz
Microscale photoacoustic imaging from a single cell to in vivo
PA microscopy, whose resolution is determined by the optical focus within the optical diffusion limit (i.e., < 1 mm), is effective not only in obtaining high-resolution images but also in providing precise quantitative results. In particular, SW-PAM, with a lateral resolution close to the optical diffraction limit, can image single cells. This level of lateral resolution is typically achieved by using an objective lens with a numerical aperture (NA) of 1.0 or greater. The first SW-PAM system, presented by Zhang et al., used an objective lens with an NA of 1.23 and a 532 nm laser source to achieve a lateral resolution of 220 nm [82]. The system works in transmission mode, where the PA excitation and ultrasonic detectors are positioned in opposition across the sample. This SW-PAM system captured high-resolution images of single melanoma cells and red blood cells. Notably, it demonstrated the use of dual intrinsic contrasts by imaging blood vessels and a transplanted melanoma together in the ear of a mouse. Zhang's SW-PAM system has promising in vivo imaging capabilities and excellent lateral resolution, but its use of transmission mode limits the thickness of the samples that can be imaged. To overcome this limitation, Song et al. presented an SW-PAM system that employs reflection-mode imaging and maintains a sub-wavelength lateral resolution [137]. The system utilized an objective lens with an NA of 1.0 and a miniature ultrasonic transducer, which were combined in a custom-made transducer holder. To validate the reflection-mode SW-PAM system, the authors demonstrated high-resolution PA imaging of the vasculature in a mouse ear and further confirmed the ability to capture images of relatively deeper areas than possible with transmission-mode SW-PAM. They successfully demonstrated the implementation of reflection mode, which is challenging to achieve with a high NA objective lens. However, the inherently short depth-of-field associated with high NA objective lenses can limit the amount of information that can be obtained by an SW-PAM system. To address this issue, Park et al. used a Bessel beam with an axicon lens to generate an extended depth-of-field in reflection mode while maintaining sub-wavelength resolution [93]. Their system could be easily switched between Bessel-beam SW-PAM (BB-SW-PAM) and Gaussian-beam SW-PAM (GB-SW-PAM) to accurately measure the superior performance of BB-SW-PAM (Fig. 5a): the BB-SW-PAM exhibited a resolution of 300 nm while demonstrating a seven-fold improvement in depth of field compared to GB-SW-PAM (Fig. 5b). Using in vivo mouse ear vasculature imaging, they demonstrated that BB-SW-PAM can obtain vascular information at a greater variety of depths than GB-SW-PAM.
Although SW-PAM’s achievement of a resolution close to the optical diffraction limit has shown promising results in cellular imaging, the system’s short focal length, structural limitations, and slow imaging speed make it challenging to achieve a more diverse functional PA imaging. However, OR-PAM has a longer focal length, allowing for a relatively more flexible system configuration and a significantly faster imaging speed, albeit at a lower resolution than SW-PAM. Recently, thanks to its fast imaging speed and functional capabilities, OR-PAM has been used for precise quantification based on high-resolution imaging. For example, by combining a contour scanning technique and a functional OR-PAM with a 2 μm lateral resolution, Yeh et al. confirmed that multiple parameters of a single micro vessel can be quantified with a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [138]. Further, functional OR-PAMs are important in understanding the physiological properties of diseased small animals [45]. As an example, high-resolution functional PAI has been used to evaluate small animals manifesting symptoms of stroke [139]. Stroke is the leading cause of death and disability in patients with ischemic heart disease. Using high-resolution PAI to characterize the cerebrovascular properties in stroke-induced small animals may help to understand stroke in humans. Recently, to study ischemic stroke, Zhu et al. developed ultrafast wide-field OR-PAM (UFF-PAM), capable of real-time high-resolution whole-brain imaging of hemodynamics and oxygenation [83]. The authors emphasized the engineering innovations of UFF-PAM, such as SRS-based dual-wavelength laser excitation, a 12-facet-polygon scanner, and deep-learning-based image upsampling (Fig. 6a). The volumetric imaging rate, lateral resolution, and field-of-view (FOV) of UFF-PAM were 2 Hz, 10 µm, and 11 mm, respectively. To observe the functional response of microvasculature to stroke-induced spreading depolarization (SD) waves, they prepared a mouse model in which permanent stroke was induced in the left hemisphere by completely occluding the left carotid artery, and then temporarily occluded the right carotid artery. With the large FOV, high speed, and high resolution of UFF-PAM, the researchers were able to calculate the average SD wave speed, to localize the origination point of each wave, to map the spreading direction, pattern, duration, and affected area (Fig. 6b), and to quantify vasoconstriction and the decrease in local oxygen saturation. Cao et al. used a functional OR-PAM to conduct an interesting study of the neuroprotective effect of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), a bioactive metabolite of sphingolipids, against ischemic stroke in awake mice [140]. The authors increased the blood S1P levels by administering sphingosine kinase 2 (SPK2) to the mice and evaluated the resulting changes in cerebral hemodynamics and oxygen metabolism. The results showed a restoration of SO2 levels in hypoxic conditions after SPK2 injection, but no significant changes in blood flow or HbT. These findings suggest that elevated blood S1P levels may lead to neuroprotective effects against ischemic stroke.
Diabetes is highly correlative with cardiovascular disease such as high blood pressure or stroke since sustained high blood glucose level constantly damages the blood vessels.
Krumholz et al. used functional OR-PAM to photoacoustically image diabetes-induced damage to the microvasculature and confirmed the possibility of diabetes diagnosis [141].
Cancer is a major global health issue and a significant cause of death. To develop new cancer diagnostic tools and therapies and improve patient outcomes, it is crucial to study the growth and treatment of tumors in animal models. Specifically, the angiogenesis around cancers and the hypoxia/hyperoxia in peripheral blood vessels are important factors in determining the occurrence and malignancy of cancer. Liu et al. developed a 5-wavelength pulse laser system based on stimulated Raman scattering to provide functional information about blood vessels, such as HbT, SO2, and blood flow speed, and applied it OR-PAM [142]. Wavelengths of 532, 545, 558, 620, and 640 nm were utilized to image blood and lymphatic vessels, and the blood flow speed was measured using the dual-pulse technique (Fig. 7a). The SO2 was calculated using the Gruneisen-relaxation effect. The researchers observed angiogenesis, a hallmark of cancer, in the ear of a mouse with a transplanted tumor and quantified the consequent increases in SO2 and blood flow speed, which accurately reflected the rapid growth of an early-stage tumor (Fig. 7b). Gong et al. used functional OR-PAM to investigate the impact of glioma on the vascular structure and function of the mouse brain [143]. They found that glioma causes microvessel growth that increases the vascular proportion in the cerebral cortex. They also confimed that the glioma causes loss of response in one hemisphere and abnormal response in the other, degrading functional connectivity.
OR-PAM has also shown great promise in studying ophthalmic diseases [42, 99, 144–146]. Recently, a fascinating research endeavor introduced a quadruple imaging system that combines OR-PAM, ultrasound imaging (USI), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescence imaging (FLI) [17]. This innovative system employed a transparent ultrasound sensor (TUT) and was specifically applied to corneal neovascularization (CNV) and inflammation casued by chemical burns (Fig. 7c). The study acquired quadruple images to analyze morphological and physiological responses. Results showed that PA images pre- and post-chemical burn revealed the presence of CNV by scrutinizing depth-encoded maximum amplitude projection images (Fig. 7d). OCT successfully rendered the cornea visible by elucidating its structural layers. Furthermore, USI demonstrated its capability to induce morphological alterations in the eye, including the development of cataracts within the lens, potentially contributing to vision impairment (Fig. 7e). In the context of FLI, the visualization of corneal epithelial inflammation, a potential cause of corneal edema, was achieved through fluorescein staining. By offering a comprehensive range of multimodal functional images, this proposed system exhibits significant potential for application in diverse biomedical studies, promising substantial contributions to the field. All the studies reviewed in this section are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Ref. | System scale | Functionality and application | Transducer | Laser | Lateral resolution | Imaging depth | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
f (MHz) | Element | PRF | Wavelength (nm) | |||||
[82] | SW-PAM | Single cells, blood vessels and melanoma | 40 | 1 | – | 532 | 220 nm | a hundred of nm |
[137] | SW-PAM | Microvasculature network | 42.6 | 1 | 40 k | 532 | 320 nm | a hundred of nm |
[93] | SW-PAM | Microvasculature network | 41 | 1 | – | 532 | 270 nm | hundreds of nm |
[83] | OR-PAM | Whole brain, oxygen saturation, stroke | 40 | 1 | 800 k | 532, 558 | 7 μm | 1.5 mm |
[140] | OR-PAM | Oxygen saturation, stroke | 35 | 1 | – | 532, 558 | – | – |
[141] | OR-PAM | Diabetes, oxygen saturation, blood Fow | 50 | 1 | – | 532, 561 | 3.4 μm | – |
[142] | OR-PAM | Oxygen saturation, lymph mapping, blood flow speed, cancer | 50 | 1 | 4 k | 532, 545, 558, 570, 620/640 | 3.1 μm | 0.8 mm |
[143] | OR-PAM | Fractional change, glioma | – | 1 | 600 k | 532 | 11.8 μm | – |
[17] | OR-PAM | Quadruple images, ophthalmic diseases | 31.5 | 1 | – | 532 | 2.4 μm | – |
f, center frequency; PRF, pulse repetition frequency; SW-PAM, subwavelength photoacoustic microscope; OR-PAM, optical-resolution photoacoustic microscope; k, kHz
Macroscale photoacoustic imaging in deep-tissue applications in vivo
Macroscale PAI, which includes PA macroscopy (PAMac) and PACT, can expand the technical advantages of functional microscale PAI beyond shallow depths and a limited field-of-view to encompass a wider range of depths and larger fields-of-view. However, this comes at the cost of decreased resolution due to the larger scale of observation. PA macroscopy, the simplest configuration of macroscopic PAI, uses a motorized scanner to perform 2D raster scanning of a mechanically focused single-element transducer. Combined with a relatively simple image reconstruction algorithm, this type of system can provide volumetric microvasculature images of small animals or humans.
The center frequency of the transducer must be carefully selected to suit the feature being imaged. A high frequency transducer can provide the fine spatial resolution needed to image cutaneous microvascular structures. Raster-scan optoacoustic mesoscopy (RSOM) can produce microvasculature images from as deep as the subcutaneous bed, with tens of microns resolution. Using wavelength-tunable high repetition rate laser, PA images of a layer of tissue acquired at series of distinct wavelengths can be spectrally unmixed according to its chromophores, such as melanin, oxy-hemoglobin, and deoxy-hemoglobin, and the composition ratio between two hemoglobin distribution may spatially encode oxygen saturation map. In a clinical application, Li et al. used multispectral RSOM to track morphological and oxygenation changes in severe atopic dermatitis [147]. The clinical applicability of RSOM was demonstrated by comparative analysis of changes in the SO2 and epidermal thickness of skin microvessels before and after treatment. RSOM’s scanning speed and SNR were further increased by using a through-hole broadband transducer, enabling four times higher pulse energy and utilizing a full 1.4 kHz laser repetition rate [85]. As a consequence, a 4 × 2 mm2 field of view could be swept within a single breath-hold (~ 15 s), reducing motion artifacts and increasing temporal sensitivity (Fig. 8a, b). Statistical classification of cuteneous melanomas (n = 10) and benign nevi (n = 10) in vivo was demonstrated by using vessel morphology biomarkers, such as the total blood volume, average vessel length, tortuosity, and fractal number (Fig. 8c).
To image organs located more deeply beneath the skin, a lower frequency transducer should be selected, because low frequency PA signals are less attenuated in propagating through tissue. Low frequency systems are widely applied in studies where PA contrast agents have accumulated in deep targeted organs [148, 149]. Jeon et al. successfully demonstrated a multiscale whole-body PAMac setup for in vivo small animal study by switching between 5 and 40 MHz ultrasound transducers depending on the size of target organ [150]. Further, whole body multispectral PA images with 5 MHz transducer setup characterized the spectral features of major blood vessels as well as intact internal organs in vivo [151–155]. As a representative result, Lee et al. demonstrated dual-color PA images acquired after contrast agents were injected to delineate two different optically transparent lymphatic networks, which are invisible in PA images [156]. Recently, Park et al. updated the system to acquire PA and US images simultaneously [157]. In a follow-up study, Lee et al. successfully compensated for breathing movement during the raster scanning by using the structural information in USI [158]. In particular, three-dimensional (3D) SO2 distributions in the whole body of mice were successfully visualized. All studies reviewed in this section are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3.
Ref. | System scale | Functionality and application | Transducer | Laser | Lateral resolution (μm) | Imaging depth (mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
f (MHz) | Element | PRF | Wavelength (nm) | |||||
[147] | PAMac | oxygen saturation | 50 | 1 | 1.3 k | 532, 555, 579, 606 | 40 | 2 |
[85] | PAMac | Melanoma; total blood volume, vessel density, average vessel length, tortuosity, fractal number, lacunarity | 10–40, 40–120 | 1 | 1.4 k | 532, 555, 576, 606 | 16.4 | 1.5 |
[150] | PAMac | multispectral whole body | 5, 40 | 1 | 10 | 532, 700, 850, 1064 | 590 | 30 |
[156] | PAMac | dual-color lymph mapping | 5 | 1 | 10 | 707, 860 | 590 | 30 |
[158] | PAMac | oxygen saturation | 5 | 1 | 10 | 750, 800, 850 | 590 | 30 |
f, center frequency; PRF, pulse repetition frequency; AR-PAM, acoustic-resolution photoacoustic microscope; PAMac, photoacoustic macroscope
Despite improvements in its speed, mechanical scanning inescapably takes a long time (typically ~ 30 min for the whole body of a mouse), and its fixed focal depth yields to non-uniform lateral resolution. PACT, a superior system, uses electrical scanning and beamforming (i.e., receive focusing) with a multi-element array transducer to enable macroscale PAI to perform real-time tomography at a higher spatial resolution [159–164]. To deliver high energy laser pulses and provide better flexibility at clinical environment, laser pulse is delivered via multiple large core optical fibers or an optical fiber bundle instead of single core or free-space delivery optics. Linear or convex array transducers, which are already used in clinical ultrasound systems, are adequate for clincally translatable bimodal PA and US imaging. Arc-shaped or spherical array transducers can reconstruct volumetric PA images since the probe geometry can overcome the limited view effect arising from each element’s directivity [165–170].
Derived from the distinctive spectral response of hemoglobin throughout the NIR band, hematoscopic features such as the local hemoglobin concentration or oxygen saturation map are among the most useful functional biomarkers within multispectral PAI. They are calculated by serial PA image acquisition with a series of distinct wavelengths, preferrably at a high frame rate to prevent interframe motion artifacts and yield better spectrally unmixed results. However, the number of piezoelectric detectors in volumetric PA probes can be several times greater than the number of DAQ channels, and hence most volumetric imaging systems adopt a N-to-1 multipliexed channel connection. Consequently, multiple laser excitations are required to acquire a single PA image, which lowers the PA image frame rate and ultimately degrades the quality of functional PAI by inducing spatial errors or artifacts.
Recently, Choi et al. demonstrated deep-learning-assisted image reconstruction to overcome temporal resolution loss coming from multiplexed channel connection [87]. Their system consisted of a tunable optical parametric oscillator (OPO) laser, a 1024-element spherical array transducer, and a 256-channel data acquisition module (Fig. 9a). The system originally required four laser illuminations to capture data from all the elements. To improve the temporal resolution of the system, they trained a deep-learning algorithm to improve the quality of the PA images obtained from the partial (256 elements) data, making it substantially comparable with the original images reconstructed with the full data (Fig. 9b). The enhanced temporal resolution was demonstrated by monitoring the brain hemodynamics in rats breathing different mixtures of oxygen and nitrogen in alternation (Fig. 9c). The spectrally unmixed SO2 map showed that oxygen levels decreased under the oxygen challenge (10% O2, 90% N2) and recovered shortly after the normal mixture (90% O2, 10% N2) was restored.
PAI, the only functional optical imaging modality that can provide blood oxygenation information at depths below the optical diffraction limit, is simultaneously operable with other medical imaging modalities. Because PAI is a hybrid acoustic imaging technique, it can provide complementary photochemical circulatory information when joined with simultaneous ultrasound imaging, a superior tool for capturing tomographic structure or flowmetry via ultrasound Doppler imaging. By utilizing the benefits of both modalities, Na et al. presented a combination of simultaneous cross-ray ultrasound tomography (CRUST) and PACT that used the same ring-shaped array to synergistically characterize cerebral hemodynamics in an intact skull and scalp [86]. To counteract the low transmission capability of the PA-purposed transducer and avoid cross-talk, a transmission-only single element spherically-focused transducer was placed in the central axis of the ring array. The passively received US RF signal was reconstructed into US images. A 4-kHz ultrafast pulse repetition rate was employed to detect the faint US Doppler signal from the cerebral microvascular flow (Fig. 10a). The US blood signal was spatiotemporally filtered out from the motionless tissue signal, then it was further processed into both power Doppler (PD) images and estimated blood vector flow map. Dual wavelength PAI acquisitions were interleaved in between of two US pulse train acquisition, under wavelength of 532 nm and 594 nm at 10 Hz pulse repetition, respectively, and further processed to obtain the estimated local concentrations of HbO2 and HbR (Fig. 10b). The local activation at ipsilateral and contralateral sites of the mouse brain during repeated hindlimb electrical stimulation was well demonstrated in both the US and PAI activation maps (Fig. 10c). Additionally, functional hemodynamic changes in PD, HbO2, HbR, HbT and SO2 were well synchronized to the external stimulation.
To understand the functional and molecular information underlying brain activity, sensing neural activation with GCaMP-mediated fluorescence imaging (FLI) has been widely employed. However, the shallow imaging depth impedes a full understading of brain physiology and neccesitates invasive interventions, such as craniectomy. By using functional PACT as an alternative tool to visualize brain hemodynamics in the intact skull, we can correlate PACT-derived and GCaMP FLI-derived biomarkers to potentially extend our knowledge of neurovascular coupling mechanisms. Chen et al. used their new hybrid fluorescence and optoacoustic tomography (FLOT) system to study the connection between brain hemodynamics and calcium responses to a given sensory stimulation [171]. A fiberscope was inserted through the central channel of a hemispherical PA array probe placed on the top of a scalp-removed mouse skull (Fig. 11a). Five distinct wavelengths (700, 730, 755, 800, and 850 nm) were used for illumination while the mouse was stimulated with a electric burst applied to its left hind limb. Together with spectrally unmixed images of HbO2 and HbR, the fluorescence image stack simultaneously acquired under a stimulation pulse train was analyzed following the general linear model-based FLOT processing pipeline. The resulting hemodynamic response function map and GCaMP calcium response function map were superimposed on the mouse’s cerebral ROI. The linearity of the revealed partial PA biomarker increases (normalized peaks of ΔHbO2/HbO2, ΔHbR/HbR, ΔHbT/HbT, ΔSO2/SO2) and the partial FL biomarker increase (normalized peak of ΔF/F) showed the coupling between calcium-associated neural activity followed by hemodynamic responses (Fig. 11b, c). Employing the similar approach, Chen et al. established concurrent magnetic resonance optoacoustic tomography (MROT) and revealed the close correlation between functional PACT signals and blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Fig. 10d) [172]. Interestingly, as seen in Fig. 11e, f, activation intensity, time to peak and maximum t-value (|tmax|), partial HbO2 and HbR increase rate exhibited superior sensitivity to that of BOLD signal increase rate toward cerebral blood perfusion responses to external stimulus, proposing MROT as a new modality to enlighten comprehensive investigation of neurovascular coupling mechanism.
Beyond the hemoglobin-derived biomarkers, broader functional PACT biomarkers can capture more comprehensive physiological changes in organs by targeting different target chromophores, the angiographic morphology, or even hemodynamic flow. If the spectral window with major hemoglobin absorption can be avoided, secondary chromophores—such as melanin, lipid, and collagen—composing a biological tissue can also be selectively targeted. For instance, there is rich absorption by lipid in the spectral region around 930 nm, and this spectral characteristic was exploited by Fasoula et al. to measure lipid accumulation in the livers of patients with hepatic steatosis [173]. Their investigation began with a pilot study involving 5 participants with steatosis and 5 without, and used a clinical hand-held MSOT/US system. Significant observations made during this pilot study were then validated and repeated with preclinical MSOT in a rodent model fed a high-fat diet. Next, 28 (human) or 29 (animal) wavelengths were selected for multispectral imaging in the 680–960 nm range, while the 900–970 nm region was chiefly used for lipid detection. The contours of the liver region, the subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) region, and the entire tissue region were carefully traced onto each multispectral stack based on their anatomical position in the co-registered ultrasound images or cryoimaging section (Fig. 12a, b). In the normalized PA spectra of each ROI, compared to the spectra of healthy volunteers, prominent absorption increases at 930 nm were confirmed in steatotic liver patients, while no significant SAT signal rise was identified (Fig. 12c, d). Further, in the liver ROIs of 930 nm monowavelength PA images, the areas under the PA intensity distribution above the intersection point of the two-group histogram were notably higher in the steatotic patient group (p-value < 0.001). This finding was highly similar to the result of an identical analysis repeated with accompanied preclinical data, signifying that MSOT can detect and monitor hepatic steatosis noninvasively in clinical circumstances.
Studying a similar target disease, Tong et al. imaged vascular anatomy changes in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by using 3D PACT with four arc-shaped ultrasonic transduver arrays [84]. Whereas the aforementioned liver steatosis study characterized the photochemical property of lipid via multispectral imaging, this study precisely focused on comparing changes in vessel morphology and acoustic properties from clear volumetric vasculatures imaged at an isotropic spatial resolution of 0.38 mm (Fig. 13a). To achieve the utmost image quality, deformations induced by respiratory motions were cancelled using time-gated reconstruction. After applying 3D high pass filtration and Hessian-based Frangi vessel filtering to enhance the blood contrast, the liver and vessels were segmented into binarized mask and the voxel number between two masks were quantified into vessel volume occupancy. For further morphological analysis, vessel centerlines were extracted by skeletonization process. More than vessel number density, the group devised a new integrative measure termed ‘angiographic irregularity’, which is a product of vessel distribution diversity and morphological irregularity. Finally, the velocity of sound was approximated by taking into account the decreased speed of sound in the lipid-rich liver, which is an essential consideration in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of hepatic conditions. From all five biomarkers, statistically clear distinctions were observed between lean and obese rats (Fig. 13b). All studies reviewed in this section are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4.
Ref. | System scale | Functionality and application | Transducer | Laser | Lateral resolution (μm) | Imaging depth (mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
f (MHz) | Element | PRF | Wavelength (nm) | |||||
[87] | PACT | Oxygen saturation | 2 | 1024 | 20 | 750, 850 | 380 | 12.8 |
[86] | PACT | Cerebral hemodynamics; HbO2, HbR, HbT, SO2 | 5.4 | 512 | 200 | 532, 594 | 170 | 3.5 |
[171] | PACT | Cerebral hemodynamics; HbO2, HbR, HbT, SO2 | 7 | 512 | 20 (100/5) | 700, 730, 755, 800, 850 | 133 | 4 |
[172] | PACT | Cerebral sensory response hemodynamics; HbO2, HbR, HbT, SO2 | 5 | 384 | 10 (50/5) | 700, 730, 755, 800, 850 | 163 | 4 |
[173] | PACT | liver steatosis; Normalized ratio spectrum, normalized optoacoustic ratio at 930 nm | 5/4 | 256/256 | 10/25 | 680–960 (10 nm step)/700–970 (10 nm step) | 300 | 34 |
[84] | PACT | liver steatosis; Liver mask volume, vessel number density, vessel volume occupancy, angiographic irregularity, speed of sound | 2.25 | 4 × 256 | 12.5 | 1064 | 380 | 12 |
[120] | PACT | Venous flow hemodynamics; flow speed, flow vector map, fractional speed change | 13–24 | 256 | 10/20/100 | 1064/670–1070 | 125 | 5.5 |
f, center frequency; PRF, pulse repetition frequency; PACT, photoacoustic computed tomography
Conclusions
The scalability of fPAI makes it a highly promising technology for a wide range of biomedical applications, spanning from the examination of human organs to imaging individual cells. In addition, its functional imaging capabilities can provide quantifiable data about disease-relevant parameters, including HbT, SO2, blood flow velocity, temperature, and MRO2. The multi-scalable and multi-functional nature of PAI has been demonstrated through its successful applications in various domains, including high-resolution imaging of brain hemodynamics in small animals, diagnosis of deep-seated cancers, and observation of human brain activity.
This review summarizes recent advances in the field of fPAI, which has shown remarkable results in various biomedical applications. The latest fPAI systems fall into into two categories: (1) fPAI in the acoustic resolution regime has enabled the mapping of lymphatic vessels and whole-body imaging in small animals. The recent development of deep-learning-assisted PACT using a 1024 spherical array transducer has enabled the monitoring of brain hemodynamics and changes in oxygen levels in rats. (2) fPAI in the optical resolution regime has enabled recent studies using high-resolution OR-PAM to evaluate cerebral hemodynamics and angiogenesis around tumors. In particular, many attempts are being made to diagnose stroke and cancer, and the imaging speed, imageable area, and resolution for this purpose have been remarkably improved. Recent studies that simultaneously captured super-resolution PA images and topological properties have contributed greatly to this field, suggesting a new direction for SR-PAM.
Advances in fPAI technologies, particularly those applied to small animal and nanoscale samples, have demonstrated great clinical potential. The development of PACT by Wang et al. has significantly advanced observations of detailed vascular structures in the human breast [66] and of brain activity [174]. The fPAI breast cancer screening developed by Oraevsky et al. has been granted a Premarket Approval Application (PMA) approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for commercial distribution in the US [49, 111]. The multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) developed Ntziachristos et al. is being utilized globally by medical professionals to monitor a range of diseases, including Crohn’s diseases [175], dermatologic diseases such as psoriatic and atopic dermatitis [176, 177], and Duchenne muscular dystrophy [134]. Kim et al. are leading the development of a programmable photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging (PAUSI) system and have applied it to the diagnosis of diseases such as thyroid cancer [62] and melanoma [72], and to foot imaging [76].
The future of fPAI holds immense promise for advancing biomedical research and clinical diagnostics. By focusing on improving imaging depth and resolution, advancing contrast agents and molecular probes, integrating multispectral and multimodal imaging, enabling real-time and dynamic imaging, and facilitating clinical translation and validation, functional PAI can reach new heights in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and clinical relevance. These advancements will pave the way for enhanced disease diagnosis, treatment guidance, and monitoring, ultimately benefiting patients and advancing healthcare.
Author contributions
BP and DO contributed equally as first authors. BP: conceptualization, investigation, visualization, writing the original draft, reviewing and editing. DO: investigation, visualization, writing the original draft, reviewing and editing. JK: conceptualization, investigation, visualization, funding acquisition, writing the original draft, reviewing and editing. CK: conceptualization, investigation, visualization, funding acquisition, writing the original draft, and reviewing and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) Grants (2021M3C1C3097624, 2020R1A6A1A03047902, 2021R1A5A1032937, 2023R1A2C3004880), the Korea Medical Device Development Fund Grant (1711195277, RS-2020-KD000008), and BK21 FOUR projects (Pohang University of Science and Technology) funded by the Korean government (the Ministry of Science and ICT; the Ministry of Education; the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy; the Ministry of Health and Welfare; the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety).
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Declarations
Competing interests
C. Kim has financial interests in OPTICHO, which, however, did not support this work. All the other authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Byullee Park and Donghyeon Oh have contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Jeesu Kim, Email: jeesukim@pusan.ac.kr.
Chulhong Kim, Email: chulhong@postech.edu.
References
- 1.Rao J, Dragulescu-Andrasi A, Yao H. Fluorescence imaging in vivo: recent advances. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2007;18(1):17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Conchello J-A, Lichtman JW. Optical sectioning microscopy. Nat. Methods. 2005;2(12):920–931. doi: 10.1038/nmeth815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huang D, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254(5035):1178–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.1957169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.So PT, et al. Two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2000;2(1):399–429. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ferrari M, Mottola L, Quaresima V. Principles, techniques, and limitations of near infrared spectroscopy. Can. J. Appl. Physiol. 2004;29(4):463–487. doi: 10.1139/h04-031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hoshi Y, Yamada Y. Overview of diffuse optical tomography and its clinical applications. J. Biomed. Opt. 2016;21(9):091312–091312. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.091312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yao J, Wang LV. Photoacoustic microscopy. Laser Photonics Rev. 2013;7(5):785–778. doi: 10.1002/lpor.201200060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Park B, et al. Deep tissue photoacoustic imaging of nickel(II) dithiolene-containing polymeric nanoparticles in the second near-infrared window. Theranostics. 2020;10(6):2509–2521. doi: 10.7150/thno.39403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang D, et al. Deep tissue photoacoustic computed tomography with a fast and compact laser system. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2017;8(1):112–123. doi: 10.1364/BOE.8.000112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ntziachristos V. Going deeper than microscopy: the optical imaging frontier in biology. Nat. Methods. 2010;7(8):603–614. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gao R, et al. Achieving depth-independent lateral resolution in AR-PAM using the synthetic-aperture focusing technique. Photoacoustics. 2022;26:100328. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cheng S, et al. High-resolution photoacoustic microscopy with deep penetration through learning. Photoacoustics. 2022;25:100314. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen M, et al. High-speed wide-field photoacoustic microscopy using a cylindrically focused transparent high-frequency ultrasound transducer. Photoacoustics. 2022;28:100417. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hakakzadeh S, et al. Multi-angle data acquisition to compensate transducer finite size in photoacoustic tomography. Photoacoustics. 2022;27:100373. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bell AG. The photophone. Science. 1880;1(11):130–134. doi: 10.1126/science.os-1.11.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xu Z, et al. Visualizing tumor angiogenesis and boundary with polygon-scanning multiscale photoacoustic microscopy. Photoacoustics. 2022;26:100342. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Park J, et al. Quadruple ultrasound, photoacoustic, optical coherence, and fluorescence fusion imaging with a transparent ultrasound transducer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118(11):e1920879118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920879118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang Y, et al. In vivo assessment of hypoxia levels in pancreatic tumors using a dual-modality ultrasound/photoacoustic imaging system. Micromachines. 2021;12(6):668. doi: 10.3390/mi12060668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee C, et al. Three-dimensional clinical handheld photoacoustic/ultrasound scanner. Photoacoustics. 2020;18:100173. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cho S, et al. Nonlinear pth root spectral magnitude scaling beamforming for clinical photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging. Opt. Lett. 2020;45(16):4575–4578. doi: 10.1364/OL.393315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim J, et al. Real-time photoacoustic thermometry combined with clinical ultrasound imaging and high intensity focused ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2019;66(12):3330–3338. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2904087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang LV. Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography. Nat. Photonics. 2009;3(9):503–509. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang LV, Hu S. Photoacoustic tomography: in imaging from organelles to organs. Science. 2012;335(6075):1458–1462. doi: 10.1126/science.1216210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Park B, et al. Dual-pulse photoactivated atomic force microscopy. Sci. Rep. 2021;11(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96646-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Danielli A, et al. Label-free photoacoustic nanoscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19(8):086006–086006. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.8.086006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yao J, et al. Photoimprint photoacoustic microscopy for three-dimensional label-free subdiffraction imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;112(1):014302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.014302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Park B, et al. Shear-force photoacoustic microscopy: toward super-resolution near-field imaging. Laser Photonics Rev. 2022;2022:2200296. doi: 10.1002/lpor.202200296. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee S, et al. Super-resolution visible photoactivated atomic force microscopy. Light Scie. Appl. 2017;6(11):e17080–e17080. doi: 10.1038/lsa.2017.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Baik JW, et al. Intraoperative label-free photoacoustic histopathology of clinical specimens. Laser Photonics Rev. 2021;15(10):2100124. doi: 10.1002/lpor.202100124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim H, et al. PAExM: label-free hyper-resolution photoacoustic expansion microscopy. Opt. Lett. 2020;45(24):6755–6758. doi: 10.1364/OL.404041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.James S, et al. Contrast agents for photoacoustic imaging: a review of stem cell tracking. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021;12(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02576-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim J, et al. Super-resolution localization photoacoustic microscopy using intrinsic red blood cells as contrast absorbers. Light Sci. Appl. 2019;8(1):1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41377-019-0220-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim C, et al. Sentinel lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels: noninvasive dual-modality in vivo mapping by using indocyanine green in rats—volumetric spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging and planar fluorescence imaging 1. Radiology. 2010;255(2):442–450. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10090281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Park S, et al. Bi2Se3 nanoplates for contrast-enhanced photoacoustic imaging at 1064 nm. Nanoscale. 2018;10(44):20548–20558. doi: 10.1039/C8NR05672B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li L, et al. Single-impulse panoramic photoacoustic computed tomography of small-animal whole-body dynamics at high spatiotemporal resolution. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2017;1(5):0071. doi: 10.1038/s41551-017-0071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ahn J, et al. Fully integrated photoacoustic microscopy and photoplethysmography of human in vivo. Photoacoustics. 2022;27:100374. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ahn J, et al. High-resolution functional photoacoustic monitoring of vascular dynamics in human fingers. Photoacoustics. 2021;23:100282. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Baik JW, et al. Super wide-field photoacoustic microscopy of animals and humans in vivo. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2019;39(4):975–984. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2938518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bi R, et al. In vivo label-free functional photoacoustic monitoring of ischemic reperfusion. J. Biophotonics. 2019;12(7):e201800454. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201800454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jeon S, et al. In vivo photoacoustic imaging of anterior ocular vasculature: a random sample consensus approach. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04334-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Silverman RH, et al. High-resolution photoacoustic imaging of ocular tissues. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2010;36(5):733–742. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu W, Zhang HF. Photoacoustic imaging of the eye: a mini review. Photoacoustics. 2016;4(3):112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2016.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yao J, et al. High-speed label-free functional photoacoustic microscopy of mouse brain in action. Nat. Methods. 2015;12(5):407–410. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yao J, Wang LV. Photoacoustic brain imaging: from microscopic to macroscopic scales. Neurophotonics. 2014;1(1):011003–011003. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.1.1.011003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hu S, et al. Functional transcranial brain imaging by optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009;14(4):040503. doi: 10.1117/1.3194136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Han S, et al. Contrast agents for photoacoustic imaging: a review focusing on the wavelength range. Biosensors. 2022;12(8):594. doi: 10.3390/bios12080594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lee D, et al. In vivo photoacoustic imaging of livers using biodegradable hyaluronic acid-conjugated silica nanoparticles. Adv. Func. Mater. 2018;28(22):1800941. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201800941. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Singh S, et al. Size-tunable icg-based contrast agent platform for targeted near-infrared photoacoustic imaging. Photoacoustics. 2022;2022:100437. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kilian HI, et al. Intraperitoneal administration for sustained photoacoustic contrast agent imaging. Photoacoustics. 2022;28:100406. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jiang Z, et al. Design and application of organic contrast agents for molecular imaging in the second near infrared (NIR-II) window. Photoacoustics. 2022;2022:100426. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kim J, et al. Organic nanostructures for photoacoustic imaging. ChemNanoMat. 2015;2(3):156–166. doi: 10.1002/cnma.201500171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Park B, et al. Listening to drug delivery and responses via photoacoustic imaging. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2022;184:114235. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Das SS, et al. Stimuli-responsive polymeric nanocarriers for drug delivery, imaging, and theragnosis. Polymers. 2020;12(6):1397. doi: 10.3390/polym12061397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Xia J, Kim C, Lovell JF. Opportunities for photoacoustic-guided drug delivery. Curr. Drug Targets. 2015;16(6):571–581. doi: 10.2174/1389450116666150707100328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jeong WY, et al. Recent trends in photoacoustic imaging techniques for 2D nanomaterial-based phototherapy. Biomedicines. 2021;9(1):80. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9010080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Miao W, et al. Image-guided synergistic photothermal therapy using photoresponsive imaging agent-loaded graphene-based nanosheets. J. Control Rel. 2015;211:28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.05.280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kang MS, et al. State of the art in carbon nanomaterials for photoacoustic imaging. Biomedicines. 2022;10(6):1374. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10061374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Li X, et al. Supramolecular phthalocyanine assemblies for improved photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy. Angew. Chem. 2020;132(22):8708–8712. doi: 10.1002/ange.201916147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fehm TF, et al. In vivo whole-body optoacoustic scanner with real-time volumetric imaging capacity. Optica. 2016;3(11):1153–1159. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.3.001153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Xia J, Wang L. Small-animal whole-body photoacoustic tomography: a review. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2013;61:1380–1389. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2283507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Han S, et al. Review on multispectral photoacoustic analysis of cancer: thyroid and breast. Metabolites. 2022;12(5):382. doi: 10.3390/metabo12050382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kim J, et al. Multiparametric photoacoustic analysis of human thyroid cancers in vivo. Can. Res. 2021;81(18):4849–4860. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-3334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kroenke M, et al. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography: a novel label-free imaging technique for the assessment of hyperthyroid diseases. J. Nucl. Med. 2019;60(1):525–525. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Roll W, et al. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of benign and malignant thyroid disorders: a pilot study. J. Nucl. Med. 2019;60(10):1461–1466. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.222174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Schoustra SM, et al. Twente photoacoustic mammoscope 2: system overview and three-dimensional vascular network images in healthy breasts. J. Biomed. Opt. 2019;24(12):121909. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.12.121909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lin L, et al. Single-breath-hold photoacoustic computed tomography of the breast. Nat. Commun. 2018;9(1):2352. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04576-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Menezes GL, et al. Downgrading of breast masses suspicious for cancer by using optoacoustic breast imaging. Radiology. 2018;288(2):355–365. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018170500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Toi M, et al. Visualization of tumor-related blood vessels in human breast by photoacoustic imaging system with a hemispherical detector array. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:41970. doi: 10.1038/srep41970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Neuschler EI, et al. A pivotal study of optoacoustic imaging to diagnose benign and malignant breast masses: a new evaluation tool for radiologists. Radiology. 2017;287(2):398–412. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017172228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kothapalli S-R, et al. Simultaneous transrectal ultrasound and photoacoustic human prostate imaging. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019;11(507):eaav2169. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav2169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Horiguchi A, et al. A pilot study of photoacoustic imaging system for improved real-time visualization of neurovascular bundle during radical prostatectomy. Prostate. 2016;76(3):307–315. doi: 10.1002/pros.23122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Park B, et al. 3D wide-field multispectral photoacoustic imaging of human melanomas in vivo: a pilot study. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020;35(3):669–676. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kim J, et al. Multispectral ex vivo photoacoustic imaging of cutaneous melanoma for better selection of the excision margin. Br. J. Dermatol. 2018;179(3):780–782. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhou Y, et al. Noninvasive determination of melanoma depth using a handheld photoacoustic probe. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017;137(6):1370–1372. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wang Y, et al. Toward in vivo biopsy of melanoma based on photoacoustic and ultrasound dual imaging with an integrated detector. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2016;7(2):279–286. doi: 10.1364/BOE.7.000279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Choi W, et al. Three-dimensional multistructural quantitative photoacoustic and us imaging of human feet in vivo. Radiology. 2022;303:467–473. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Taruttis A, et al. Optoacoustic imaging of human vasculature: feasibility by using a handheld probe. Radiology. 2016;281(1):256–263. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Matsumoto Y, et al. Label-free photoacoustic imaging of human palmar vessels: a structural morphological analysis. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19161-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kim C, Favazza C, Wang LV. In vivo photoacoustic tomography of chemicals: high-resolution functional and molecular optical imaging at new depths. Chem. Rev. 2010;110(5):2756–2782. doi: 10.1021/cr900266s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lee H, et al. Review on optical imaging techniques for multispectral analysis of nanomaterials. Nanotheranostics. 2022;6(1):50. doi: 10.7150/ntno.63222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kim C, Razansky D. Listening to light and seeing through: biomedical photoacoustic imaging. IEEE Pulse. 2015;6(3):3–4. doi: 10.1109/MPUL.2015.2409351. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zhang C, Maslov K, Wang LV. Subwavelength-resolution label-free photoacoustic microscopy of optical absorption in vivo. Opt. Lett. 2010;35(19):3195–3197. doi: 10.1364/OL.35.003195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zhu X, et al. Real-time whole-brain imaging of hemodynamics and oxygenation at micro-vessel resolution with ultrafast wide-field photoacoustic microscopy. Light Sci. Appl. 2022;11(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41377-022-00836-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Tong X, et al. Non-invasive 3D photoacoustic tomography of angiographic anatomy and hemodynamics of fatty livers in rats. Adv. Sci. 2023;10(2):2205759. doi: 10.1002/advs.202205759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.He H, et al. Fast raster-scan optoacoustic mesoscopy enables assessment of human melanoma microvasculature in vivo. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):2803. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30471-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Na S, Zhang Y, Wang LV. Cross-ray ultrasound tomography and photoacoustic tomography of cerebral hemodynamics in rodents. Adv. Sci. 2022;9(25):2201104. doi: 10.1002/advs.202201104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Choi S, et al. Deep learning enhances multiparametric dynamic volumetric photoacoustic computed tomography in vivo (DL-PACT) Adv. Sci. 2023;10(1):2202089. doi: 10.1002/advs.202202089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Choi W, et al. Recent advances in contrast-enhanced photoacoustic imaging: overcoming the physical and practical challenges. Chem. Rev. 2023;1:1. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Kim J, et al. Deep learning acceleration of multiscale superresolution localization photoacoustic imaging. Light Sci. Appl. 2022;11(1):131. doi: 10.1038/s41377-022-00820-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Kim JY, et al. Fast optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy using a 2-axis water-proofing MEMS scanner. Sci. Rep. 2015;5(1):1–5. doi: 10.1038/srep07932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Shintate R, et al. High-speed optical resolution photoacoustic microscopy with MEMS scanner using a novel and simple distortion correction method. Sci. Rep. 2022;12(1):9221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12865-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Cao R, et al. Optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy with a needle-shaped beam. Nat. Photonics. 2022;2022:1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41566-022-01112-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Park B, et al. Reflection-mode switchable subwavelength Bessel-beam and Gaussian-beam photoacoustic microscopy in vivo. J. Biophotonics. 2019;12(2):e201800215. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201800215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Chen Q, Xie H, Xi L. Wearable optical resolution photoacoustic microscopy. J. Biophotonics. 2019;12(8):e201900066. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201900066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Tsytsarev V, et al. Photoacoustic microscopy of microvascular responses to cortical electrical stimulation. J. Biomed. Opt. 2011;16(7):076002–076002-6. doi: 10.1117/1.3594785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Maslov K, et al. Optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy for in vivo imaging of single capillaries. Opt. Lett. 2008;33(9):929–931. doi: 10.1364/OL.33.000929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ma H, et al. Switchable optical and acoustic resolution photoacoustic dermoscope dedicated into in vivo biopsy-like of human skin. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020;116(7):073703. doi: 10.1063/1.5143155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Lin L, et al. Handheld optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2017;22(4):041002–041002. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.4.041002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Liu W, et al. In vivo corneal neovascularization imaging by optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy. Photoacoustics. 2014;2(2):81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2014.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Hu S, et al. Label-free photoacoustic ophthalmic angiography. Opt. Lett. 2010;35(1):1–3. doi: 10.1364/OL.35.000001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Diot G, et al. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography (Msot) of human breast cancermsot signatures of human breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23(22):6912–6922. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kruger RA, et al. Photoacoustic angiography of the breast. Med. Phys. 2010;37(11):6096–6100. doi: 10.1118/1.3497677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Liu Y, et al. Assessing the effects of norepinephrine on single cerebral microvessels using optical-resolution photoacoustic microscope. J. Biomed. Opt. 2013;18(7):076007–076007. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.7.076007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Burton NC, et al. Multispectral opto-acoustic tomography (MSOT) of the brain and glioblastoma characterization. Neuroimage. 2013;65:522–528. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Danielli A, et al. Single-wavelength functional photoacoustic microscopy in biological tissue. Opt. Lett. 2011;36(5):769–771. doi: 10.1364/OL.36.000769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Fang H, Maslov K, Wang LV. Photoacoustic Doppler effect from flowing small light-absorbing particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;99(18):184501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.184501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Chen S-L, et al. Photoacoustic correlation spectroscopy and its application to low-speed flow measurement. Opt. Lett. 2010;35(8):1200–1202. doi: 10.1364/OL.35.001200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Song W, et al. A combined method to quantify the retinal metabolic rate of oxygen using photoacoustic ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography. Sci. Rep. 2014;4(1):6525. doi: 10.1038/srep06525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Liu T, et al. Combined photoacoustic microscopy and optical coherence tomography can measure metabolic rate of oxygen. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2011;2(5):1359–1365. doi: 10.1364/BOE.2.001359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Kim J, et al. Programmable real-time clinical photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging system. Sci. Rep. 2016;6(1):35137. doi: 10.1038/srep35137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Oraevsky A, et al. Clinical optoacoustic imaging combined with ultrasound for coregistered functional and anatomical mapping of breast tumors. Photoacoustics. 2018;12:30–45. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2018.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Ivankovic I, et al. Real-time volumetric assessment of the human carotid artery: handheld multispectral optoacoustic tomography. Radiology. 2019;291(1):45–50. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Sun M, et al. Full three-dimensional segmentation and quantification of tumor vessels for photoacoustic images. Photoacoustics. 2020;20:100212. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Huang G, et al. In vivo quantitative photoacoustic evaluation of the liver and kidney pathology in tyrosinemia. Photoacoustics. 2022;28:100410. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Brown EL, et al. Quantification of vascular networks in photoacoustic mesoscopy. Photoacoustics. 2022;26:100357. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Lao Y, et al. Noninvasive photoacoustic imaging of the developing vasculature during early tumor growth. Phys. Med. Biol. 2008;53(15):4203. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/15/013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Laufer J, et al. In vivo preclinical photoacoustic imaging of tumor vasculature development and therapy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17(5):056016–056016. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.5.056016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Zhao H, et al. Three-dimensional Hessian matrix-based quantitative vascular imaging of rat iris with optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy in vivo. J. Biomed. Opt. 2018;23(4):046006–046006. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.4.046006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Lin L, Wang LV. The emerging role of photoacoustic imaging in clinical oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2022;19(6):365–384. doi: 10.1038/s41571-022-00615-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Y. Zhang, et al., Photoacoustic vector tomography for deep hemodynamic imaging. Preprint (2022). arXiv:2209.08706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 121.Liu C, Liang Y, Wang L. Single-shot photoacoustic microscopy of hemoglobin concentration, oxygen saturation, and blood flow in sub-microseconds. Photoacoustics. 2020;17:100156. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Becker A, et al. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of the human breast: characterisation of healthy tissue and malignant lesions using a hybrid ultrasound-optoacoustic approach. Eur. Radiol. 2018;28:602–609. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5002-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Heijblom M, et al. Visualizing breast cancer using the Twente photoacoustic mammoscope: what do we learn from twelve new patient measurements? Opt. Express. 2012;20(11):11582–11597. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.011582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Bungart BL, et al. Photoacoustic tomography of intact human prostates and vascular texture analysis identify prostate cancer biopsy targets. Photoacoustics. 2018;11:46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2018.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Horiguchi A, et al. Pilot study of prostate cancer angiogenesis imaging using a photoacoustic imaging system. Urology. 2017;108:212–219. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Steinberg I, et al. Superiorized photo-acoustic non-negative reconstruction (SPANNER) for clinical photoacoustic imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2021;40(7):1888–1897. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3068181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Luke GP, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy revisited: ultrasound-guided photoacoustic detection of micrometastases using molecularly targeted plasmonic nanosensors. Can. Res. 2014;74(19):5397–5408. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Park B, et al. A photoacoustic finder fully integrated with a solid-state dye laser and transparent ultrasound transducer. Photoacoustics. 2021;23:100290. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Song KH, et al. Noninvasive in vivo spectroscopic nanorod-contrast photoacoustic mapping of sentinel lymph nodes. Eur. J. Radiol. 2009;70(2):227–231. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.01.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Gottschalk S, et al. Rapid volumetric optoacoustic imaging of neural dynamics across the mouse brain. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2019;3(5):392–401. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0372-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Li L, Yao J, Wang LV. Photoacoustic tomography of neural systems. Neural Eng. 2020;2020:349–378. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-43395-6_12. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Li Y, et al. Snapshot photoacoustic topography through an ergodic relay for high-throughput imaging of optical absorption. Nat. Photonics. 2020;14(3):164–170. doi: 10.1038/s41566-019-0576-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Chen L, et al. Quantitative photoacoustic imaging for early detection of muscle ischemia injury. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017;9(5):2255. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Regensburger AP, et al. Detection of collagens by multispectral optoacoustic tomography as an imaging biomarker for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nat. Med. 2019;25(12):1905–1915. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0669-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Regensburger AP, et al. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography for non-invasive disease phenotyping in pediatric spinal muscular atrophy patients. Photoacoustics. 2022;25:100315. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Dazzi A, Prater CB. AFM-IR: technology and applications in nanoscale infrared spectroscopy and chemical imaging. Chem. Rev. 2017;117(7):5146–5173. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Song W, et al. Reflection-mode in vivo photoacoustic microscopy with subwavelength lateral resolution. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2014;5(12):4235–4241. doi: 10.1364/BOE.5.004235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Yeh C, et al. Microvascular quantification based on contour-scanning photoacoustic microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19(9):096011–096011. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.9.096011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Yang X, et al. Photoacoustic imaging for monitoring of stroke diseases: a review. Photoacoustics. 2021;23:100287. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Cao R, et al. Photoacoustic microscopy reveals the hemodynamic basis of sphingosine 1-phosphate-induced neuroprotection against ischemic stroke. Theranostics. 2018;8(22):6111. doi: 10.7150/thno.29435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Krumholz A, et al. Functional photoacoustic microscopy of diabetic vasculature. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17(6):060502–060502. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.6.060502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Liu C, et al. Five-wavelength optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy of blood and lymphatic vessels. Adv. Photonics. 2021;3(1):016002. doi: 10.1117/1.AP.3.1.016002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Gong X, et al. Photoacoustic microscopy visualizes glioma-induced disruptions of cortical microvascular structure and function. J. Neural Eng. 2022;19(2):026027. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac5fcc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Jiao S, et al. Photoacoustic ophthalmoscopy for in vivo retinal imaging. Opt. Express. 2010;18(4):3967–3972. doi: 10.1364/OE.18.003967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Liu X, et al. Optical coherence photoacoustic microscopy for in vivo multimodal retinal imaging. Opt. Lett. 2015;40(7):1370–1373. doi: 10.1364/OL.40.001370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Zhang W, et al. High-resolution, in vivo multimodal photoacoustic microscopy, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescence microscopy imaging of rabbit retinal neovascularization. Light Sci. Appl. 2018;7(1):103. doi: 10.1038/s41377-018-0093-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Li X, et al. Multispectral raster-scanning optoacoustic mesoscopy differentiate lesional from non-lesional atopic dermatitis skin using structural and functional imaging markers. Photoacoustics. 2022;28:100399. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Wang Y, et al. Photoacoustic tomography of a nanoshell contrast agent in the in vivo rat brain. Nano Lett. 2004;4(9):1689–1692. doi: 10.1021/nl049126a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Zhang HF, et al. Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006;24(7):848–851. doi: 10.1038/nbt1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Jeon M, Kim J, Kim C. Multiplane spectroscopic whole-body photoacoustic imaging of small animals in vivo. Med. Biol. Eng. Compu. 2016;54:283–294. doi: 10.1007/s11517-014-1182-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Lee MY, et al. Biodegradable photonic melanoidin for theranostic applications. ACS Nano. 2015;1:1. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b05931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Song J, et al. “Smart” gold nanoparticles for photoacoustic imaging: an imaging contrast agent responsive to the cancer microenvironment and signal amplification via pH-induced aggregation. Chem. Commun. 2016;52(53):8287–8290. doi: 10.1039/C6CC03100E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Lee H, et al. Hyaluronate—gold nanorod/DR5 antibody complex for noninvasive theranosis of skin cancer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8(47):32202–32210. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b11319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Rieffel J, et al. Hexamodal imaging with porphyrin-phospholipid-coated upconversion nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2015;1:1. doi: 10.1002/adma.201404739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Shin MH, et al. Multimodal cancer theranosis using hyaluronate-conjugated molybdenum disulfide. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019;8(1):1801036. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201801036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Lee C, et al. Dual-color photoacoustic lymph node imaging using nanoformulated naphthalocyanines. Biomaterials. 2015;73:142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Park E-Y, et al. Simultaneous dual-modal multispectral photoacoustic and ultrasound macroscopy for three-dimensional whole-body imaging of small animals. Photonics. 2021;8(1):13. doi: 10.3390/photonics8010013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Lee H, et al. Ultrasound-guided breath-compensation in single-element photoacoustic imaging for three-dimensional whole-body images of mice. Front. Phys. 2022;10:457. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2022.894837. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Gateau J, et al. Three-dimensional optoacoustic tomography using a conventional ultrasound linear detector array: whole-body tomographic system for small animals. Med. Phys. 2013;40(1):013302. doi: 10.1118/1.4770292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Needles A, et al. Development and initial application of a fully integrated photoacoustic micro-ultrasound system. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2013;60(5):888–897. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Brecht H-P, et al. Whole-body three-dimensional optoacoustic tomography system for small animals. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009;14(6):064007. doi: 10.1117/1.3259361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Su R, et al. Three-dimensional optoacoustic imaging as a new noninvasive technique to study long-term biodistribution of optical contrast agents in small animal models. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17(10):1015061–1015067. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.10.101506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Razansky D, Buehler A, Ntziachristos V. Volumetric real-time multispectral optoacoustic tomography of biomarkers. Nat. Protoc. 2011;6(8):1121–1129. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Xia J, et al. Whole-body ring-shaped confocal photoacoustic computed tomography of small animals in vivo. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17(5):050506. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.5.050506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Yang J, Choi S, Kim C. Practical review on photoacoustic computed tomography using curved ultrasound array transducer. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 2022;12:19–35. doi: 10.1007/s13534-021-00214-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Choi W, Oh D, Kim C. Practical photoacoustic tomography: realistic limitations and technical solutions. J. Appl. Phys. 2020;127(23):230903. doi: 10.1063/5.0008401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Lv J, et al. Hemispherical photoacoustic imaging of myocardial infarction: in vivo detection and monitoring. Eur. Radiol. 2018;28(5):2176–2183. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5209-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Dean-Ben XL, Razansky D. Portable spherical array probe for volumetric real-time optoacoustic imaging at centimeter-scale depths. Opt. Express. 2013;21(23):28062–28071. doi: 10.1364/OE.21.028062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Deán-Ben XL, Razansky D. Adding fifth dimension to optoacoustic imaging: volumetric time-resolved spectrally enriched tomography. Light Sci. Appl. 2014;3(1):e137. doi: 10.1038/lsa.2014.18. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Deán-Ben XL, et al. Spiral volumetric optoacoustic tomography visualizes multi-scale dynamics in mice. Light Sci. Appl. 2017;6(4):e16247–e16247. doi: 10.1038/lsa.2016.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Chen Z, et al. Multimodal noninvasive functional neurophotonic imaging of murine brain-wide sensory responses. Adv. Sci. 2022;9(24):2105588. doi: 10.1002/advs.202105588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Chen Z, et al. Simultaneous functional magnetic resonance and optoacoustic imaging of brain-wide sensory responses in mice. Adv. Sci. 2023;10(3):2205191. doi: 10.1002/advs.202205191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Fasoula N-A, et al. Non-invasive multispectral optoacoustic tomography resolves intrahepatic lipids in patients with hepatic steatosis. Photoacoustics. 2023;29:100454. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Na S, et al. Massively parallel functional photoacoustic computed tomography of the human brain. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2022;6(5):584–592. doi: 10.1038/s41551-021-00735-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Knieling F, et al. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography for assessment of Crohn’s disease activity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376(13):1292–1294. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1612455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Aguirre J, et al. Precision assessment of label-free psoriasis biomarkers with ultra-broadband optoacoustic mesoscopy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2017;1(5):0068. doi: 10.1038/s41551-017-0068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Yew YW, et al. Raster-scanning optoacoustic mesoscopy imaging as an objective disease severity tool in atopic dermatitis patients. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2021;84(4):1121–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.