Skip to main content
PeerJ Computer Science logoLink to PeerJ Computer Science
. 2023 Apr 24;9:e1321. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1321

Content analysis of social media regarding obesity as a chronic disease

Farah Abdul Razzak 1, Diane Saab 2, Firas Haddad 2, Jumana Antoun 1,
Editor: Vladimir Simic
PMCID: PMC10280592  PMID: 37346663

Abstract

Background

Social media is an effective online communication channel. Obesity has been classified as a chronic disease; yet, social media rarely portrays it as such. This study aims to explore the perception of obesity as a chronic disease through content analysis of social media content of obesity-related health organizations and weight loss commercial applications.

Methods

Using a codebook adapted from the definition of chronic disease, content analysis was conducted to evaluate a set of posts sampled from 11 health-related organizations and 10 weight loss applications Facebook and Twitter accounts. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the extent obesity was portrayed as a chronic disease.

Results

A total of 8,106 posts were extracted: 3,019 posts by organizations and 5,087 by weight loss commercial applications. Only 401 (4.5%) posts/tweets were related to obesity as a chronic disease and were posted by obesity-related health organizations. Only 69 (2.0%) posts from all the organizations’ posts directly addressed the idea that obesity is a chronic disease. Almost none of the weight loss commercial apps’ social media accounts tackled any aspect of obesity as a disease. Commercial applications’ posts revolved mainly around recipes, exercise regimens, and behavioral advice, whereas organizations tackled more complications, treatment, and obesity bias.

Conclusion

Using content analysis of social media content, obesity-related health organizations and weight loss applications did not emphasize obesity as a chronic disease on their social media platforms of Facebook and Twitter. Weight-loss commercial applications on social media should include more posts to modify the public’s perception regarding obesity as a disease, contributing to health promotion. Further research should explore other social media platforms and posts with specific hashtags posted by the general population.

Keywords: Obesity, Social medial content analysis, Chronic disease

Introduction

Social media is a communication channel between science and the public (Hunter, 2016), where healthcare professionals can share health information with their patients. The media frames the public’s opinions and perceptions about health issues in easily comprehended and disseminated formats (Aguilar & Terán, 2016), affecting their health attitudes and behaviors (Chen et al., 2018; Depue et al., 2015; Ortiz, Smith & Coyne-Beasley, 2019). Social media serves as a form of health communication, fostering interaction and sharing, facilitating health messages, and contributing to health promotion and healthcare policymaking (Moorhead et al., 2013).

Obesity is a global public health problem, with the World Health Organization reporting a threefold increase in global prevalence since 1975 (Organization, 2021). Obesity was recognized as a medical condition as the American Medical Association (AMA) recognized it as a chronic disease requiring medical attention in 2013 (Pollack, 2013), and multiple other professional health organizations followed later (Bray et al., 2017). Since then, the public has shown some acceptance of obesity as a disease (AlArab & Antoun, 2022; Puhl & Liu, 2015), yet the adoption of this novel concept has been slow, particularly on social media.

Social media frames obesity with prominent stigmatization (Jeon et al., 2018; Stanford, Tauqeer & Kyle, 2018; Wanniarachchi et al., 2020) where people with obesity are often portrayed as unhealthy individuals who lack willpower and self-control (Lupton, 2018; Stanford, Tauqeer & Kyle, 2018; Yoo & Kim, 2012). According to recent media research, the dominant themes in obesity-related media reports focus on individual diet and physical activity choices and less frequently on the complex interactions of biology, society, and environmental factors that contribute to obesity (Chou, Prestin & Kunath, 2014; Lupton, 2018; Lydecker et al., 2016; So et al., 2016; Stanford, Tauqeer & Kyle, 2018; Yoo & Kim, 2012). While social media support groups exist (Dahl, Hales & Turner-McGrievy, 2016), they often focus on behavioral solutions. The media seems to fail to portray obesity as a multifactorial disease state. Therefore, this study aims to explore the perception of obesity as a chronic disease through content analysis of social media content of obesity-related health organizations and weight loss commercial applications.

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study used content analysis of Facebook posts and tweets to identify social media communication regarding obesity as a chronic disease. The American University of Beirut granted ethical approval to carry out the study (SBS-2021-0065).

Study setting and sample

This study evaluated a sample of Facebook posts and tweets of 11 major obesity-related health organizations and 10 commercial weight loss application accounts. The list of health organizations (Appendix A) was selected from a list of 26 organizations and events curated by the ACTION study, landmark research designed by a multi-disciplinary steering committee that comprised representatives from the Obesity Society, the Obesity Action Coalition and the Integrated Benefits Institute, and other obesity experts (Depue et al., 2015). As for commercial weight loss apps, we used Healthline lists for the best weight loss apps of 2021 (10 apps). The Healthline team manages an extensive medical network of over one hundred professionals covering more than fifty specialties, ensuring that published information is accurate and evidence-based (Wang et al., 2021). All posts and tweets were publicly accessible online, and no names were recorded.

Data collection

General information about the Facebook or Twitter account was collected. For the organizations, the following data were collected: the aim of the organization; whether it is local, international, or regional; the number of its members; the number of followers, and the total number of posts. As for weight loss applications, data collected included: focus of the app, whether the app was paid or free, the total number of posts, and total number of followers. Appendix A shows the characteristics of the organization or app’s social media accounts.

All posts (Facebook) and tweets (Twitter) between Aug 1, 2020, and Jan 31, 2021, were extracted manually to an excel document that is password-protected and shared among the research team. Duplicates of the same post or tweet within the same social media platform or across the two platforms were included. If the post was a retweet or share of another Facebook post, only the text posted by the concerned organization was included; any linked images, videos, or websites were excluded. Written posts other than English were excluded. In the excel sheet, each organization or app was given a code; therefore, the posts were deidentified. From each post or tweet, we recorded the date, the full post/tweet, and the code of the organization/weight-loss app.

Codebook development

The research team developed a codebook to interpret whether the meaning of the post/tweet text is related to the concept of obesity as a chronic disease. The initial codebook was derived from the elements of obesity as a chronic disease: chronicity, multifactorial causes, risk factors, symptoms, complications, prevention, and treatment. Using the initial codebook, a deductive approach was used to code 5–10% of the posts and tweets. Two investigators (DH and FH) coded each post or tweet independently, with the possibility to code a post with more than one code. The investigators used an inductive method to identify additional codes based on the data throughout this round. The study team collaboratively developed an updated final codebook applied to the data (Table 1).

Table 1. Codebook.

Main categories Code
The target audience of the message Health care professionals; public
Obesity is a chronic disease Chronic nature
Disease
Relapsing nature
Causes of obesity Multi-causal disease
Combination of inherited factors, environment, personal diet, and exercise choices
Genetic
Behavioral
Metabolic
Mental
Hormonal
Fat cells
Pathophysiology process (leptin, ghrelin, etc.)
Environmental (fast food, unprocessed food)
Microbiome
Risk factors to develop obesity as a disease Family inheritance and influences
Lifestyle choices
Certain diseases and medications
Social and economic issues
Age
Lack of sleep
Stress
Symptoms ---
Complications or obesity-associated diseases Diabetes, cancer, HTN, cardiovascular disease, sleep apnea; osteoarthritis, gall stone disease
Quality of life ---
Prevention Exercise
Eating plan
Diagnosis Health history
Physical exam
BMI
Waist circumference
Blood tests
Treatment Dietary changes
Exercise and activity
Behavior changes (self-monitoring, cognitive behavioral therapy, etc.)
Weight loss medications
Endoscopic procedures for weight loss and weight loss surgery
Other treatments (vagal nerve block)
Clinical trials
Alternative medicine (herbal remedies, vitamins and minerals, Mind-body therapies—such as acupuncture, mindfulness meditation and yoga)
Coping and support
Weight bias ---
Irrelevant post

Data analysis

Content analysis was used to interpret the meaning of the posts’ texts. The unit of analysis was the whole post or tweet. Two investigators independently identified the category of the posts/tweets based on the codebook. First, the post/tweet was identified as related to obesity as a chronic disease or irrelevant. If it was related to obesity as a chronic disease, the post’s category was identified using the codebook. Any discrimination was resolved by the third investigator (JA) after a discussion with the team. The excel sheet data was imported into IBM SPSS statistical package, version 26, for data analysis. Descriptive analysis was performed to quantify the number of codes and categories as percentages of the total posts. Sub-analysis was performed based on the health organizations and apps.

Results

A total of 8,106 posts were extracted, where 3,019 were posted by obesity-related organizations and 5,087 were posted by weight-loss commercial apps. Most of the posts were on Facebook (5,121), while the rest were on Twitter (2,985). On average, there were 26.5 ± 8.4 posts per day on Facebook and 16.2 ± 16.5 on Twitter in 6 months, from Aug 1, 2020, to Jan 31, 2021. Daily, organizations posted an average of 1.9 ± 7.2 on Facebook and 1.8 ± 1.5 on Twitter. Weight-loss commercial app social media accounts had, on average, 2.3 ±1.7 posts per day and 4.6 ± 9.3 on Twitter. Figure 1 shows the total posts and obesity-related posts by each app and organization account.

Figure 1. Posts/tweets of health-care organizations and commercial weight loss applications’ social media accounts.

Figure 1

Only 4.5% (401 posts/tweets) were related to obesity as a chronic disease and were posted by obesity-related health organizations. Only 69 (2.0%) posts from all the organizations’ posts clearly stated that obesity is a chronic disease. Almost 99.9% of the app-weight loss social media accounts posted on exercise, recipes, nutrition, and behavioral advice, and almost none tackled any aspects of obesity as a disease. Table 2 shows the percentage of the codes by organizations and weight-loss app social media accounts. Obesity-related complications were primarily coded among health organizations’ social media posts (n = 122, 4.0%), and few posts targeted prevention, obesity causes, and risk factors. Table 3 shows the comments or phrases used to frame obesity as a chronic disease.

Table 2. Distribution of the codes assigned to the posts.

Organization
N = 3,019
App
N = 5,087
Chronic disease 59 (2.0) 0 (0)
Obesity causes 31 (1.0) 1 (0)
Obesity risk factors 32 (1.0) 2 (0)
Obesity complications 122 (4.0) 0 (0)
Obesity and quality of life 2 (0.1) 0 (0)
Obesity prevention 7 (0.2) 0 (0)
Obesity treatment (medication or surgery) 82 (2.7) 9 (0)
Obesity bias 76 (2.5) 0 (0)

Table 3. List of comments regarding obesity as chronic disease.

“Obesity as a disease”.
“Obesity is not only a complex disease but also a complex topic”.
“Obesity should be treated just like any other disease in the media”.
Americans are beginning to understand obesity more as a medical condition and less as a personal fault
Chronic relapsing disease
Complex disease
Complicated disease
Raise awareness of the disease of obesity
Refocus the perception of obesity and change the perception of individuals affected by this chronic disease
Right to evidence-based treatment for the disease of obesity
Obesity management must be based on the principles of chronic disease management
Perceive obesity in the same light as any other disease

Discussion

This study examined the content of Facebook and Twitter posts to assess whether significant obesity health-related organizations and weight loss commercial applications frame obesity as a chronic disease. Unsurprisingly, obesity as a disease was almost non-existent in 8,106 posts over 6 months. Only 2% of obesity health organization-related posts included obesity as a disease, and it was almost non-existent in social media accounts of weight loss applications. Our findings align with what is known about obesity framing in social media. Social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Youtube) and traditional sources like newspapers display an unbalanced emphasis on the triad of obesity, diet, and physical activity (Atanasova & Koteyko, 2017; Chou, Prestin & Kunath, 2014; Hussin, Frazier & Thompson, 2011; Lupton, 2018; Lydecker et al., 2016; Sandberg, 2007; So et al., 2016; Stanford, Tauqeer & Kyle, 2018; Yoo & Kim, 2012). Social media is an example of a powerful tool that the general public can easily access and use to participate in change and spread misinformation (Valenzuela et al., 2019). So et al. (2016) analyzed 121,268 tweets about obesity between Jan 2012 and March 2012. Obesity-related tweets addressing individual-level causes for obesity received more retweets and shares than tweets that looked at societal issues like the availability of cheap or unhealthy food (So et al., 2016). Similarly, reviews of widespread obesity YouTube videos concluded that most depictions of obesity were linked to personal factors (Hussin, Frazier & Thompson, 2011; Yoo & Kim, 2012).

The media bias for individual framings could be multifactorial. It may be deep-rooted in a desire to please the readers. The public perception of obesity as a disease is still slow (Puhl & Liu, 2015), leading us to believe that the media prefers familiar and well-known topics that appeal to the general public. In addition, the public prefers reading about concrete situations in which they can identify themselves rather than the more abstract and didactic aspects of obesity (Bastian, 2011). This could explain why social media pays so little attention to obesity as a disease. Furthermore, the authors of this study theorize that weight loss applications are designed to provide subscribers with better diet plans and rigorous weight loss exercises. Hence, it would be more in alignment with their purpose of creation to have their social media platforms focus on the former issues mentioned rather than on the management of obesity as a disease requiring follow-up with health care providers.

Comparison with prior work

Obesity discussions differ across social media platforms. Chou, Prestin & Kunath (2014) analyzed 2.2 million posts to study weight-related social media interactions. Condescending and derogatory comments with the content of weight stigmatization flooded Twitter and Facebook, while more insensitive comments flooded blogs and forums (Chou, Prestin & Kunath, 2014). In our study, we only analyzed Facebook and Twitter content. Still, we did not record any discriminatory or weight-stigmatizing comments as the social media accounts of both the obesity health organizations and weight loss applications are professional. Yet, in our study, weight bias was discussed in only 2.5% of the obesity health organization posts. It seems their social media accounts fail to promote awareness about obesity as a disease (as previously mentioned) and other important topics such as weight bias. In addition, Chou, Prestin & Kunath (2014) also reported the impact of language usage. Using the words obese and obesity rather than fat resulted in more discussions that focus on obesity as a disease (Chou, Prestin & Kunath, 2014). Our study findings show that even when the word obese is used, and obesity is addressed as a disease, obesity health organizations discuss it superficially without going into depth. Obesity health organizations need to move towards a more proactive role in changing the perception of obesity as a disease and decreasing weight bias.

In the past few decades, social media has proven its efficacy in raising awareness and creating change in public perceptions and attitudes on various social issues such as smoking (Naslund et al., 2017; Yoo, Yang & Cho, 2016), HIV testing, and adherence to medication (Bychkov & Young, 2018; Wang et al., 2019), and most recently COVID vaccinations (Puri et al., 2020). Social media has been used for public awareness regarding the appropriate use of antibiotics (Catalan-Matamoros, Pariente & Elias-Perez, 2019). Concerning obesity, news media frames show a significant impact on weight-related attitudes. Compared with people who read fat-positive frames (that highlight obesity as uncontrollable by individual factors), people who read fat-negative frames (that highlight obesity as a controllable issue) were more likely to negatively judge obese people and support weight-based job discrimination and prejudice. Yet, adding anti-stigma messages tempered the expression of prejudice (Frederick et al., 2020). Social media is a cost-effective tool that can hold obesity support groups (Dahl, Hales & Turner-McGrievy, 2016), fight weight stigma (Zavattaro, 2021), and potentially educate the public about obesity as a disease entity. Health organizations, healthcare providers, and governments should play a key role, through social media platforms, in providing the public with evidence-based information about obesity as a complex multifactorial disease.

Strengths and limitations

This study analyzes how social media portrays obesity as a chronic disease. It’s the result of a manual content analysis of many posts from two popular social medial platforms. It adds to our understanding of the information displayed to the public regarding the obesity pandemic. However, some limitations affect the generalization of the results. First, only Facebook and Twitter posts were analyzed. Even though these are still the most popular social media platforms, they are not representative of all social media platforms. Second, because only publicly accessible posts were mined, a substantial amount of private content may be left out of the analysis. Finally, this study does not look into social media conversations. It only analyzed initial posts as we were mainly interested in exploring the information organizations and commercial apps are disseminating.

Conclusions

Despite 10 years of announcing obesity as a chronic disease, this concept is still not well disseminated. Although health-related organizations have started to share awareness on the nature of obesity as a chronic disease, it is not yet satisfactory. As for weight loss applications, the main focus of their social media content is recipes, exercise, and advice. This underestimates the true nature of obesity and considers it a state of overeating and under-exercising. The media can play a critical role in modifying the public’s perception regarding obesity as a disease to help in its prevention and management. Stakeholders of weight loss applications have a role in educating the public on obesity as a chronic disease. Individuals struggling with weight gain may follow weight loss applications on social media more than professional-healthcare organizations. Further research should look into other social platforms alongside posts with specific hashtags posted by the general population.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Raw data of rating of posts and code.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1321/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Characteristics of the final list of organizations and weight-loss apps selected for social media content analysis.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1321/supp-2

Acknowledgments

Diane Saab and Firas Haddad were involved in this research under the Medical Research Volunteer Program (MRVP) at the American University of Beirut. The authors acknowledge the contribution of Maya Saleh in the data collection who was involved in this research under the Medical Research Volunteer Program (MRVP) at the American University of Beirut.

Funding Statement

The authors received no funding for this work.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

Jumana Antoun is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Farah Abdul Razzak conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Diane Saab conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Firas Haddad conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Jumana Antoun conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The American University of Beirut granted ethical approval to carry out the study.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are available in the Supplemental File.

References

  • Aguilar & Terán (2016).Aguilar J, Terán O. Politics and Social Activism: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Pennsylvania: IGI Global; 2016. Social media and free knowledge: case study-public opinion formation; pp. 433–466. [Google Scholar]
  • AlArab & Antoun (2022).AlArab N, Antoun J. Patients’ acceptance of obesity as a chronic disease: a qualitative study in Lebanon. BMJ Open. 2022;12(3):e059366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Atanasova & Koteyko (2017).Atanasova D, Koteyko N. Obesity frames and counter-frames in British and German online newspapers. Health. 2017;21(6):650–669. doi: 10.1177/1363459316649764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bastian (2011).Bastian A. Representations of childhood obesity in Australian newsprint media and academic literature. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2011;35(2):135–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00660.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bray et al. (2017).Bray GA, Kim KK, Wilding JPH, World Obesity F Obesity: a chronic relapsing progressive disease process. A position statement of the World Obesity Federation. Obesity Reviews. 2017;18(7):715–723. doi: 10.1111/obr.12551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bychkov & Young (2018).Bychkov D, Young S. Social media as a tool to monitor adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Clinical and Translational Research. 2018;3:407. doi: 10.18053/jctres.03.2017S3.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Catalan-Matamoros, Pariente & Elias-Perez (2019).Catalan-Matamoros D, Pariente A, Elias-Perez C. What we know about media communication on antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance: a systematic review of the scientific literature. Patient Education and Counseling. 2019;102(8):1427–1438. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2018).Chen Y-Y, Li C-M, Liang J-C, Tsai C-C. Health information obtained from the internet and changes in medical decision making: questionnaire development and cross-sectional survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2018;20(2):e47. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chou, Prestin & Kunath (2014).Chou WY, Prestin A, Kunath S. Obesity in social media: a mixed methods analysis. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2014;4(3):314–323. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0256-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dahl, Hales & Turner-McGrievy (2016).Dahl AA, Hales SB, Turner-McGrievy GM. Integrating social media into weight loss interventions. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2016;9:11–15. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Depue et al. (2015).Depue JB, Southwell BG, Betzner AE, Walsh BM. Encoded exposure to tobacco use in social media predicts subsequent smoking behavior. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2015;29(4):259–261. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130214-ARB-69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Frederick et al. (2020).Frederick DA, Tomiyama AJ, Bold JG, Saguy AC. Can she be healthy at her weight? Effects of news media frames on antifat attitudes, dieting intentions, and perceived health risks of obesity. Stigma and Health. 2020;5(3):247–257. doi: 10.1037/sah0000195. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Hunter (2016).Hunter P. The communications gap between scientists and public. EMBO Reports. 2016;17(11):1513–1515. doi: 10.15252/embr.201643379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hussin, Frazier & Thompson (2011).Hussin M, Frazier S, Thompson JK. Fat stigmatization on YouTube: a content analysis. Body Image. 2011;8(1):90–92. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jeon et al. (2018).Jeon YA, Hale B, Knackmuhs E, Mackert M. Weight stigma goes viral on the internet: systematic assessment of YouTube comments attacking overweight men and women. Interactive Journal of Medical Research. 2018;7(1):e9182. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.9182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lupton (2018).Lupton D. Fat. Abingdon: Routledge; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • Lydecker et al. (2016).Lydecker JA, Cotter EW, Palmberg AA, Simpson C, Kwitowski M, White K, Mazzeo SE. Does this tweet make me look fat? A content analysis of weight stigma on Twitter. Eating and Weight Disorders—Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity. 2016;21(2):229–235. doi: 10.1007/s40519-016-0272-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moorhead et al. (2013).Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2013;15(4):e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Naslund et al. (2017).Naslund JA, Kim SJ, Aschbrenner KA, McCulloch LJ, Brunette MF, Dallery J, Bartels SJ, Marsch LA. Systematic review of social media interventions for smoking cessation. Addictive Behaviors. 2017;73(3):81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Organization (2021).Organization WH. Obesity and overweight. 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight
  • Ortiz, Smith & Coyne-Beasley (2019).Ortiz RR, Smith A, Coyne-Beasley T. A systematic literature review to examine the potential for social media to impact HPV vaccine uptake and awareness, knowledge, and attitudes about HPV and HPV vaccination. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 2019;15(7–8):1465–1475. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1581543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pollack (2013).Pollack A. AMA recognizes obesity as a disease: [Business/Financial desk]. New York Times. https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/m-recognizes-obesity-as-disease/docview/1369301432/se-2. 2013. https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/m-recognizes-obesity-as-disease/docview/1369301432/se-2
  • Puhl & Liu (2015).Puhl RM, Liu S. A national survey of public views about the classification of obesity as a disease. The Obesity Society. 2015;23(6):1288–1295. doi: 10.1002/oby.21068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Puri et al. (2020).Puri N, Coomes EA, Haghbayan H, Gunaratne K. Social media and vaccine hesitancy: new updates for the era of COVID-19 and globalized infectious diseases. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 2020;16(11):2586–2593. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sandberg (2007).Sandberg H. A matter of looks: the framing of obesity in four Swedish daily newspapers. Communications. 2007;32(4):447–472. doi: 10.1515/COMMUN.2007.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • So et al. (2016).So J, Prestin A, Lee L, Wang Y, Yen J, Chou W-YS. What do people like to share about obesity? A content analysis of frequent retweets about obesity on Twitter. Health Communication. 2016;31(2):193–206. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.940675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stanford, Tauqeer & Kyle (2018).Stanford FC, Tauqeer Z, Kyle TK. Media and its influence on obesity. Current Obesity Reports. 2018;7(2):186–192. doi: 10.1007/s13679-018-0304-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Valenzuela et al. (2019).Valenzuela S, Halpern D, Katz JE, Miranda JP. The paradox of participation versus misinformation: social media, political engagement, and the spread of misinformation. Digital Journalism. 2019;7(6):802–823. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2019.1623701. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2021).Wang A, Bera K, Sharma AN, Nguyen B-N, Rojek NW, Bera R. Nationwide needs assessment survey of financial literacy among psychiatry residents. Academic Psychiatry. 2021;46(3):1–2. doi: 10.1007/s40596-021-01498-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2019).Wang L, Podson D, Chen Z, Lu H, Wang V, Shepard C, Williams JK, Mi G. Using social media to increase HIV testing among men who have sex with men—Beijing, China, 2013–2017. Morbidity and mortality weekly report 68:478. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wanniarachchi et al. (2020).Wanniarachchi VU, Mathrani A, Susnjak T, Scogings C. A systematic literature review: what is the current stance towards weight stigmatization in social media platforms? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2020;135(2):102371. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.102371. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Yoo & Kim (2012).Yoo JH, Kim J. Obesity in the new media: a content analysis of obesity videos on YouTube. Health Communication. 2012;27(1):86–97. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.569003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yoo, Yang & Cho (2016).Yoo W, Yang J, Cho E. How social media influence college students’ smoking attitudes and intentions. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;64(2):173–182. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zavattaro (2021).Zavattaro SM. Taking the social justice fight to the cloud: Social media and body positivity. Public Integrity. 2021;23(3):281–295. doi: 10.1080/10999922.2020.1782104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Raw data of rating of posts and code.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1321/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Characteristics of the final list of organizations and weight-loss apps selected for social media content analysis.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1321/supp-2

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are available in the Supplemental File.


Articles from PeerJ Computer Science are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES