Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 20.
Published in final edited form as: BJOG. 2020 Mar 10;127(6):773–774. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16148

Letter to the Editor, BJOG Exchange

JLC Borgogna 1, MD Shardell 2,3, EK Santori 1, TM Nelson 1,4, JM Rath 5,6, ED Glover 7, J Ravel 2,8, P Gravitt 9, CJ Yeoman 1,4, RM Brotman 2,3
PMCID: PMC10281050  NIHMSID: NIHMS1762652  PMID: 32154972

Re: The vaginal metabolome and microbiota of cervical HPV-positive and HPV-negative women: a cross-sectional analysis

Dear Sir,

We thank Zhang et al.1 for their interest in our recent research article2. The resident vaginal microbiota has a considerable effect on the overall vaginal metabolome, as was first shown in 2013 by Yeoman et al. who demonstrated that the metabolome was associated with the low-Lactobacillus state of bacterial vaginosis (BV)3, a finding also supported by Srinivasan et al.4 In two subsequent papers, our group has demonstrated that the microbiota contributes between 23–31% of the total variation in the vaginal metabolome2,5. While it is impossible to eliminate the effect of the vaginal microbiota in observational studies of the metabolome, we controlled in multivariable models for bacterial community state types (CSTs), as well as smoking5 in our analyses. We also stratified by CST, another approach to holding the bacterial composition constant, which may also partially adjust for unmeasured confounding factors that influence the metabolome through microbiota. Under these statistical model conditions, we still observed metabolomic differences between HPV+ and HPV- women in each CST stratum, indicating a direct metabolic signal associated with HPV.

Certainly, it is plausible that other unmeasured variables might also affect the metabolome irrespective of microbiota and consequently our results; this was the motivation for our HPV study. Herein, we were limited by our relatively small sample size (39 women). The national prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae range between 1–7%;68 therefore, in the present study of 39 women, we expect that few participants would have one of these sexually transmitted infections (STIs); thus, it is unlikely that further adjustment or exclusion for a STI would dramatically affect our results and doing so would add to statistical issues of data sparsity. Further, study participants reported relatively few sexual risk-taking behaviors, suggesting low STI risk. Most participants (>90%) reported either none, or one, sexual partner within the two months prior to the study and number of partners was not significantly associated with HPV detection status (See Supplemental Table S1). Assessing Candida albicans in the context of the vaginal metabolome is of interest, unfortunately, Candida data are not available for this study.

The vaginal metabolome has the potential to provide novel insights into female sexual and reproductive health. However, as in all research, the application and generalizability of results are limited by study design, sample size, and clinical feasibility. Utilizing multi-omics-based approaches in the context of well-designed epidemiologic studies provides additional tools to enable the identification of potential biomarkers associated with infections and diseases and may lead to clinically pertinent innovative therapies and preventative measures.

References:

  • 1).Zhang et al. Comment on ‘The vaginal metabolome and microbiota of cervical HPV-positive and HPVnegative women: a cross-sectional analysis” [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2).Borgogna JC, Shardell MD, Santori EK, Nelson TM, Rath JM, Glover ED, et al. The vaginal metabolome and microbiota of cervical HPV-positive and HPV-negative women: a cross-sectional analysis. BJOG. 2020. Jan;127(2):182–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3).Yeoman CJ, Thomas SM, Miller ME, et al. A multi-omic systems-based approach reveals metabolic markers of bacterial vaginosis and insight into the disease. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4).Srinivasan S, Morgan MT, Fiedler TL, et al. Metabolic signatures of bacterial vaginosis. mBio. 2015;6(2):e00204–15. Published 2015 Apr 14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00204-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5).Nelson TM, Borgogna JC, Michalek RD et al. Cigarette smoking is associated with an altered vaginal tract metabolomic profile. Sci Rep 8, 852 (2018) doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14943-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6).Sutton M, Sternberg M, Koumans EH, McQuillan G, Berman S, Markowitz L The prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among reproductive-age women in the United States, 2001–2004 Clin Infect Dis. 2007. Nov 15;45(10):1319–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7).Torrone E, Papp J, Weinstock H. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection among persons aged 14–39 years — United States, 2007–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(38):834–838. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8).Satterwhite CL, Torrone E, Meites E, et al. Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: Prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40(3): 187–193. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318286bb53. Review. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES