Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2023 May 30;61(6):e01847-22. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01847-22

Whole-Genome Subtyping Reveals Population Structure and Host Adaptation of Salmonella Typhimurium from Wild Birds

Yezhi Fu a,, Nkuchia M M’ikanatha b, Edward G Dudley a,c,
Editor: Alexander Mellmannd
PMCID: PMC10281135  PMID: 37249426

ABSTRACT

Within-host evolution of bacterial pathogens can lead to host-associated variants of the same species or serovar. Identification and characterization of closely related variants from diverse host species are crucial to public health and host-pathogen adaptation research. However, the work remained largely underexplored at a strain level until the advent of whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Here, we performed WGS-based subtyping and analyses of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (n = 787) from different wild birds across 18 countries over a 75-year period. We revealed seven avian host-associated S. Typhimurium variants/lineages. These lineages emerged globally over short timescales and presented genetic features distinct from S. Typhimurium lineages circulating among humans and domestic animals. We further showed that, in terms of virulence, host adaptation of these variants was driven by genome degradation. Our results provide a snapshot of the population structure and genetic diversity of S. Typhimurium within avian hosts. We also demonstrate the value of WGS-based subtyping and analyses in unravelling closely related variants at the strain level.

KEYWORDS: avian hosts, host adaptation, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, whole-genome sequencing

INTRODUCTION

Salmonella enterica is a major zoonotic bacterial pathogen that causes morbidity and mortality in humans and animals worldwide (1, 2). More than 2,500 serovars have been identified within the species Salmonella enterica according to the distinct combination of O and H antigens (3). These serovars are roughly grouped into two categories based on their host specificity, that is, serovars with broad host range (generalists) and narrow host range (specialists) (4). Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis are examples of generalists that can colonize and cause diseases in a wide variety of host species, such as humans, livestock, poultry, and wildlife. However, Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A are restricted to humans and higher primates (5, 6), while serovars Choleraesuis (pig adapted), Dublin (cattle adapted), Abortusovis (sheep adapted), and Gallinarum (avian adapted) are associated with specific livestock or poultry (7).

Although S. Typhimurium is considered the prototypical generalist serovar, epidemiologic evidence supports that this serovar has undergone adaptive evolution within specific host species, particularly in wild birds. Some avian host-associated S. Typhimurium variants identified by phage typing include definite phage type 2 (DT2) and DT99 circulating in pigeon (8), DT8 linked to duck/goose (9), and DT40 and DT56 adapted to passerine (10). Recently, we also documented three S. Typhimurium variants associated with larid, water bird, and passerine (11). The emergence of host-associated variants in a broad-host-range serovar suggests that defining generalist bacterial pathogens at a species or serovar level is an oversimplification and also highlights the importance of within-host evolution in shaping bacterial genetic diversity and host specificity.

Each host species represents a distinct ecological niche for bacterial pathogens. Over the course of colonization and infection, bacterial pathogens face challenges from the host species, such as host immune response, antibiotic treatment, and native microbiota. Such challenges put selective pressure on bacterial pathogens and force them to evolve within the host (12). As a result, bacterial pathogens are subjected to genomic changes to develop mechanisms of immune evasion and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), leading to emerging variants of the same species (13). Wild birds constitute unique but underexplored ecological niches for microbes. Bacterial pathogens colonizing avian hosts may evolve divergently from their relatives residing in domestic animals due to differences in host environment (e.g., body temperature, immune system, and exposure to antibiotics) (8, 14, 15). Therefore, avian hosts may represent underestimated reservoirs for emerging pathogenic variants.

The emergence of new variants of bacterial pathogens poses a threat to public health as they may present distinct pathogenicity and epidemicity. It is important to identify new variants, characterize their genetic diversity, and correlate individual variants with their respective hosts. This will contribute to our understanding of the evolution, adaptability, and pathogenicity potential of bacterial pathogens within diverse hosts and will also be valuable for outbreak investigation and infection control/treatment. The traditional antibody-based serotyping method is used to differentiate between bacterial variants of the same species to a serovar level based on their surface antigens (3). However, serotyping cannot distinguish bacterial variants of the same serovar. Several subtyping techniques, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (16, 17), seven-housekeeping-gene multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (18, 19), and phage typing (20), have been developed for the latter purpose. Although these methods have been routinely used in surveillance for bacterial pathogens, they still lack resolution in discriminating between closely related variants at the strain level. Moreover, they cannot provide genetic information, such as antimicrobial resistance and virulence of the tested variants (21). Advances in whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-based subtyping and analyses provide superior resolution in identifying bacterial pathogens and unravelling their phylogenetic relationships and genetic makeup (22). Currently, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and whole-genome or core genome-based MLST analyses are among the most commonly adopted WGS-based subtyping methods, which can differentiate bacterial pathogens at a strain level (2325).

In this study, we performed WGS-based subtyping and analyses of 787 S. Typhimurium isolates collected from diverse wild birds from 1946 to 2021 across 18 countries. The overall goal of this study is to reveal the population structure and genetic diversity of S. Typhimurium within avian hosts. By identifying distinct S. Typhimurium variants associated with avian hosts using WGS-based subtyping and analyses, our specific objectives are to (i) gain insights into how within-host evolution of bacterial pathogens shapes their host specificity, (ii) identify the evolutionary and genetic basis of S. Typhimurium adaptation to different host species, and (iii) assess the use of WGS-based subtyping and analyses in distinguishing between closely related variants (strain level) from multiple host species.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data set collection.

S. Typhimurium genomes from avian hosts (n = 787) retrieved from EnteroBase (search term: source niche-wild animal; source type-avian; predicted serotype: serovar Typhimurium) were used to infer the population structure of this bacterial pathogen in wild birds. The avian isolates were collected over broad spatial and temporal scales (Data Set S1 in the supplemental material). Among the 787 genomes deposited at EnteroBase, we sequenced and uploaded 414 genomes as part of a nationwide project collaborating with the US Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center to reveal the antimicrobial resistance profile and evolutionary history of avian S. Typhimurium in the United States (11, 26). The S. Typhimurium isolates were collected from diseased or dead birds in 43 US states from 1978 to 2019 (Data Set S1). The other 373 genomes were collected between 1946 and 2021 from 18 countries (including the United States) across the world and were publicly available at EnteroBase (Data Set S1). We further refined the 787 genomes by excluding those without a designated collection year, location, or bird host or those not belonging to an avian host-associated lineage. The filtered collection (n = 207) (Data Set S2) was used for core genome SNP (cgSNP)-based maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis and Bayesian inference. Notably, although the use of a filtered collection instead of the full collection for Bayesian inference can dramatically reduce the computation time, it may lead to nonrandom selection of isolates. In addition, contextual genomes (Data Set S3; n = 83) from major S. Typhimurium epidemic lineages circulating worldwide were selected based on previous studies (14, 27, 28) to infer the phylogenetic relationship and compare the genomic differences of S. Typhimurium from avian and other diverse host species (humans, livestock, and poultry).

DNA extraction and whole-genome sequencing.

For DNA extraction of the avian isolates, each isolate was streaked onto xylose lysine deoxycholate agar plates and incubated for 18 h at 37°C. A single colony was then picked, transferred to Luria-Bertani broth, and cultured overnight at 37°C with continuous agitation (250 rpm). Genomic DNA was extracted using a Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA purity (ratio of absorbance at 260 nm to absorbance at 280 nm of ≥1.8 and ≤2.0) was confirmed using NanoDrop One (Thermo Scientific, DE, USA), and DNA concentration was quantified using a Qubit 3.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). Extracted genomic DNA was stored at −20°C before WGS. For WGS, DNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA library prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), normalized using a quantitation-based procedure, and pooled at equal volume. The pooled library (600 μL) was denatured and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

Quality assessment for raw reads.

The quality of raw reads obtained in this study and downloaded from EnteroBase was assessed using the MicroRunQC workflow in GalaxyTrakr v2 (29). Sequence data passing quality control thresholds (i.e., average coverage of greater than 30, average quality score of greater than 30, less than 400 contigs, and a total assembly length between 4.4 and 5.l Mb) were used for subsequent genomic analyses.

Phylogenetic analysis.

A neighbor joining (NJ) tree (https://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/ms_tree?tree_id=70709) was built based on the whole-genome MLST (wgMLST) scheme (21,065 loci) at EnteroBase (30) to infer the population structure of S. Typhimurium from avian hosts (n = 787). Seven avian host-associated lineages were identified in the NJ tree. Genomes from the seven avian host-associated lineages were then refined as described in Data collection. The filtered collection of 207 S. Typhimurium genomes (Data Set S2) was used to build the cgSNP-based ML phylogenetic tree. Specifically, Snippy (Galaxy v4.5.0; https://github.com/tseemann/snippy) was used to generate a full alignment and find SNPs between the reference genome LT2 (RefSeq NC_003197.2) and the genomes of avian isolates, and Snippy-core (Galaxy v4.5.0; https://github.com/tseemann/snippy) was used to convert the Snippy outputs into a core SNP alignment. The resultant core SNP alignment (6,310 SNPs in the core genomic regions) was used to construct a cgSNP-based ML phylogenetic tree by MEGA X v10.1.8 using the Tamura-Nei model and 1,000 bootstrap replicates (31). Sequence types of the filtered S. Typhimurium isolates were identified using seven-gene (aroC, dnaN, hemD, hisD, purE, sucA, and thrA) MLST at Enterobase (30) and annotated on the cgSNP-based ML phylogenetic tree. We also added contextual genomes (Data Set S3; n = 83) that represented the major S. Typhimurium epidemic lineages circulating globally in the cgSNP-based ML phylogenetic tree to infer the genetic relationship of lineages formed by avian and nonavian (e.g., humans, livestock, and poultry) isolates. The cgSNP-based ML phylogenetic trees generated in this study were visualized and annotated using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL v6; https://itol.embl.de).

Bayesian inference.

The temporal signal of the sequence data was examined using TempEst v1.5.3 (32) before phylogenetic molecular clock analysis. Subsequently, a Bayesian time-scaled phylogenetic tree was constructed via BEAUti v2.6.5 and BEAST2 v2.6.5 (33) using the core SNP alignment (6,310 SNPs in the core genomic regions) generated from the filtered collection (n = 207). Bayesian model selection was based on estimating the marginal likelihood and calculating the Bayes factors with the nested sampling method (34). Within the preliminarily tested models (clock model-strict or relaxed log normal; prior assumption-coalescent constant population or coalescent Bayesian skyline), the highest supported model was the relaxed log normal clock with a coalescent Bayesian skyline model. Therefore, the parameters in BEAUti v2.6.5 were set as follows: prior assumption-coalescent Bayesian skyline; clock model-relaxed clock log normal; Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC): chain length of 250 million, storing every 1,000 generations. Three independent runs with the same parameters were performed in BEAST2 v2.6.5 to ensure convergence. The resultant log files were viewed in Tracer v1.7.2 to ensure that the effective sample size (ESS) of key parameters was more than 200. A maximum clade credibility tree was created using TreeAnnotator v2.6.4 with a burnin percentage of 10%. Finally, the tree was visualized using FigTree v1.4.4 (https://github.com/rambaut/figtree/releases) and annotated with the emergence times and substitution rates of individual lineages. To determine the substitution rate, we multiplied the substitution rate estimated by the BEAST2 platform by the number of cgSNPs (6,310 bp) and then divided the product by the average core genome size of the avian isolates (4,951,383 bp).

Pangenome analysis.

Raw reads of the 207 avian isolates and 83 contextual isolates from diverse host species were de novo assembled using Shovill (Galaxy v1.0.4) (35) and annotated by Prokka (Galaxy v1.14.6) (36). The annotated contigs in GFF3 format produced by Prokka were taken by Roary (Galaxy v3.13.0) (37) to calculate the pangenome with a minimum percentage identity of 95% for blastp. Specifically, lineage-associated core genes (i.e., genes present in more than 99% of isolates from a specific lineage) were calculated by using genomes from individual lineages as input (passerine lineage 1: n = 59; passerine lineage 2: n = 26; larid lineage: n = 33; duck/goose lineage: n = 23; pigeon lineage 1: n = 17; pigeon lineage 2: n = 21; water bird lineage: n = 28; ST313 lineage: n = 10; DT204 complex lineage: n = 9; U288 complex lineage: n = 20; ST34 lineage: n = 21; DT193 complex lineage: n = 9; DT104 complex lineage: n = 14). S. Typhimurium core genes (i.e., genes present in more than 99% of isolates from all lineages) were calculated by using genomes from all the isolates (n = 290) of avian and nonavian origin as input. We also performed a pairwise comparison of lineage-associated core genes to evaluate the genetic relatedness of individual lineages. First, the number of core genes shared by two lineages was calculated by using genomes from the two lineages. Second, the number of core genes that differed between the two lineages was obtained by subtracting the core genes shared by two lineages from lineage-associated core genes.

AMR, plasmid, and virulence profiling.

ABRicate (Galaxy v1.0.1) (38) was used to identify the AMR genes, plasmid replicons, and virulence factors by aligning each draft genome assembly (see Pangenome analysis) against the ResFinder database (39), PlasmidFinder database (40), and Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) (41), respectively. For all searches using ABRicate, a minimum nucleotide identity and coverage threshold of 80% was used for both. Virulence genes that were not 100% identical or covered with the reference virulence gene from VFDB may have deletions, insertions, or substitutions of interest. We then manually checked the mutation type by aligning the virulence gene of interest against the reference virulence gene from VFDB using BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).

Data availability.

Sequence data of the S. Typhimurium isolates from our lab (isolate name in the format “PSU-4 digits,” for example, PSU-2718) are deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) under BioProject PRJNA357723. Publicly available sequence data were downloaded from EnteroBase (https://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/), NCBI SRA (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra), and the European Nucleotide Archive (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena). Accession numbers of the genomes used in this study are listed in Data Sets S1 to S3.

RESULTS

Collection of S. Typhimurium isolates from avian hosts.

A total of 787 S. Typhimurium isolates from avian hosts (the term avian hosts herein refers to wild birds and does not include domestic poultry) were retrieved from EnteroBase on 10 January 2022 (Data Set S1 in the supplemental material). The avian hosts were grouped into six categories based on bird type/phylogeny (42, 43) (Fig. 1; Data Set S1), that is, passerine (order Passeriformes, also known as songbirds or perching birds such as sparrow, finch, siskin, and cardinal; n = 207), larid (order Charadriiformes, such as gull and tern; n = 138), duck/goose (order Anseriformes; n = 37), pigeon (order Columbiformes; n = 58), water bird (clade Aequornithes, such as cormorant, heron, pelican, and stork; n = 154), and others (avian hosts without a designated bird type at EnteroBase or other bird types not mentioned above; n = 193). The collection contained historical and contemporary (1946 to 2021) isolates sampled from 18 countries across North America (n = 587), Europe (n = 124), Oceania (n = 52), Asia (n = 18), South America (n = 5), and Africa (n = 1) (Fig. 1). Of note, among the 787 genomes at EnteroBase, our group sequenced and uploaded 414 genomes (collection year: 1978 to 2019; collection location: 43 US states). Overall, our collection represented the most diverse collection of S. Typhimurium isolates from avian hosts at EnteroBase as of the retrieval time.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Avian isolates of Salmonella Typhimurium used in this study (n = 787). (A) Number of isolates grouped by avian hosts. The “Others” bird type indicates avian hosts without a designated bird type at EnteroBase or any bird types not included in the defined categories. (B) Number of isolates grouped by geographic locations. (C) Number of isolates grouped by collection years. N/A, the collection year is not available. (The figure was created with BioRender.com.)

Population structure of S. Typhimurium from avian hosts.

To investigate the population structure of S. Typhimurium from avian hosts, we generated a neighbor joining (NJ) tree of the 787 genomes (Fig. 2A) using the Salmonella wgMLST scheme at EnteroBase. Ten S. Typhimurium lineages defined by the tree topology and their associated host species were present on the NJ tree, which included seven distinct lineages clustered by isolates (n = 633) primarily associated with specific bird types, that is, passerine lineage 1 and lineage 2, larid lineage, duck/goose lineage, pigeon lineage 1 and lineage 2, and water bird lineage (Fig. 2A). The other three lineages on the NJ tree were formed by isolates from diverse bird types (Fig. 2A). As avian hosts usually are highly mobile and can migrate across different continents or countries, we also investigated the impact of geographic locations on the clustering pattern of the avian isolates. The seven S. Typhimurium lineages defined by bird type all contained isolates from ≥2 continents, indicating a global distribution of these lineages (Fig. S1). Further, each individual lineage included isolates from multiple countries (Fig. S2). Within the same lineage, isolates were observed to cluster based on collection countries. For examples, in passerine lineage 1, isolates from New Zealand clustered as a sublineage of the US passerine lineage (Fig. S2A); in the larid lineage, isolates from Australia clustered as a sublineage of the US larid lineage (Fig. S2C). These observations indicate clonal expansions within different continents or countries, likely facilitated by bird migration (44, 45).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Population structure of globally sourced Salmonella Typhimurium isolates from avian hosts. (A) NJ tree of the 787 S. Typhimurium isolates from avian hosts (https://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/ms_tree?tree_id=70709). The NJ tree is constructed based on the Salmonella wgMLST scheme (21,065 loci) at EnteroBase. The scale bar indicates allele differences in 200 wgMLST loci (or genes). Allele differences between isolates are indicated by numbers on the connecting lines. In the legend “Bird type,” the number in brackets indicates the number of isolates from that specific bird type. “Other, not specified” represents avian hosts without a designated bird type at EnteroBase. “Other, specified” represents avian hosts that do not belong to passerine, larid, water bird, duck/goose or pigeon, and the number of isolates from these avian hosts is less than 10. More detailed information on individual bird types and the corresponding isolates can be found in Data Set S1 in the supplemental material. (B) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of the 207 S. Typhimurium isolates from avian hosts (see Data set collection in the Materials and Methods for the selection criteria for the 207 isolates out of the whole collection of 787 isolates). The tree is built based on 6,310 SNPs in the core genomic regions with reference to S. Typhimurium LT2 and rooted at midpoint. Individual avian host-associated lineages are supported by a bootstrap value of 100%. The color strip “Sequence type” represents the S. Typhimurium multilocus sequence type determined by seven-gene (aroC, dnaN, hemD, hisD, purE, sucA, and thrA) MLST.

We filtered the 787 genomes by excluding those without a collection year, location, specific bird host, or other important metadata information. The filtered collection of 207 S. Typhimurium genomes (Data Set S2) was used for further phylogenetic analysis and Bayesian inference. A maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree based on 6,310 core-genome SNPs (cgSNPs) of the 207 genomes was built to validate the population structure of avian S. Typhimurium inferred by wgMLST. The lineages present in the cgSNP-based ML phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2B) were supported by robust bootstrap values of 100% and were congruent with those formed in the NJ tree based on wgMLST.

A total of six STs (ST19, 99, 128, 568, 3719, and 7075) were identified among the seven lineages based on the classic seven-housekeeping-gene MLST method (Fig. 2B). Specifically, isolates from passerine lineage 1, larid lineage, duck/goose lineage, and pigeon lineage 1 all belonged to ST19, which is consistent with the fact that ST19 is one of the most prevalent S. Typhimurium sequence types detected in a broad range of hosts (19). In addition, isolates from pigeon lineage 2 were represented by ST128, and variable STs were present in isolates from passerine lineage 2 (i.e., ST19, 568, and 7075) and the water bird lineage (i.e., ST99 and 3719). Therefore, sequence types defined by the seven-housekeeping-gene MLST method did not distinguish between the lineages defined by bird type. The limitation of MLST for typing strains has also been demonstrated in other bacterial pathogens with highly dynamic genomes, such as Acinetobacter baumannii (46).

Emergence times of avian S. Typhimurium lineages.

Temporal signals of the sequence data were examined by TempEst (32) before Bayesian molecular clock analysis. Moderate to strong temporal signals (correlation coefficient between 0.65 and 0.96) were detected in the sequence data (Fig. S3). After confirming the temporal signal, we built a Bayesian time-scaled phylogenetic tree using BEAST2 v2.6.5 to infer the emergence times of the lineages (Fig. 3). Based on Bayesian inference, passerine lineage 1, passerine lineage 2, larid lineage, duck/goose lineage, and pigeon lineage 1 emerged in ca. 1950 (95% highest probability density [HPD]: 1940 to 1959), ca. 1969 (95% HPD: 1959 to 1977), ca. 1943 (95% HPD: 1925 to 1957), ca. 1826 (95% HPD: 1771 to 1885), and ca. 1959 (95% HPD: 1947 to 1969), respectively (Fig. 3). Isolates from the five lineages mostly belonged to ST19 except that some isolates from passerine lineage 2 presented variable STs (Fig. 2B), indicating that these lineages diverged from a most recent common ancestor (MRCA) belonging to ST19. Pigeon lineage 2 (ST128) and the water bird lineage (ST99 and 3719) evolved independently and formed in ca. 1847 (95% HPD: 1798 to 1886) and ca. 1953 (95% HPD: 1935 to 1967), respectively (Fig. 3). Of note, the duck/goose lineage and pigeon lineage 2 emerged in the 19th century (i.e., 1826 for the duck/goose lineage and 1847 for pigeon lineage 2), whereas the other five lineages formed within the 20th century from 1940 to 1970. The results show that S. Typhimurium evolved on short timescales to form individual lineages within avian hosts. We then estimated the median substitution rate for each lineage according to Bayesian inference. Median substitution rates for individual lineages ranged from 1.3 × 10−7 to 6.4 × 10−7 substitutions per site per year, with the lowest substitution rate for the duck/goose lineage and the highest substitution rate for the water bird lineage (Fig. S4). These estimates are higher than the long-term (over million years) substitution rates in Salmonella and Escherichia coli (10−10 to 10−9 substitutions per site per year) (47) but similar to the short-term (over months or years) substitution rates reported for two ST313 lineages adapted to humans in sub-Saharan Africa (1.9 × 10−7 and 3.9 × 10−7 substitutions per site per year) (48).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Emergence times of avian host-associated Salmonella Typhimurium lineages inferred by Bayesian time-scaled tree. Estimated emergence times of individual lineages are reported as median years with 95% highest posterior probability density (HPD). The red dot at the tree tip represents the reference genome from S. Typhimurium LT2 (collection year: ca. 1948). The posterior probability values of representative divergent events are greater than 95% (not shown in the figure).

Phylogenetic relationship of S. Typhimurium from avian and other diverse hosts.

To investigate the phylogenetic relationship between avian isolates and other sourced isolates, we included 83 contextual genomes from diverse host species (humans, pigs, cattle, and poultry) other than wild birds in the previous cgSNP-based ML phylogenetic tree. The contextual genomes represented the major epidemiologic S. Typhimurium lineages circulating globally (Data Set S3). Taken together with the seven avian host-associated lineages, we presented a comprehensive population structure of S. Typhimurium in diverse hosts (Fig. 4). An NJ tree (Fig. S5) of the 207 avian and 83 contextual genomes based on the Salmonella wgMLST scheme at EnteroBase was built to complement the cgSNP-based ML phylogenetic tree. Isolates present in the NJ tree had the same clustering pattern as those shown in the ML phylogenetic tree based on cgSNPs (Fig. 4).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Phylogenetic relationship of Salmonella Typhimurium lineages circulating within diverse hosts (n = 290). The legend field at the right of the tree represents the S. Typhimurium lineage (primary host). Broad host range in parentheses indicates that isolates from the corresponding lineage are commonly identified among humans, cattle, pigs, and poultry. The specific host species in parentheses indicates that isolates from the corresponding lineage are primarily from that specific host (herein, the specific host is referred to as primary host). Individual lineages are correlated with their associated primary host species in the tree. Gray shaded host species in the U288 complex lineage and DT204 complex lineage represent minor hosts (herein, if isolates of a specific lineage are occasionally collected from a host species, the host species is then referred to as minor host) other than the primary host.

There were 13 lineages present in the ML phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4), which can be divided into two categories based on host range, that is, lineages with a broad host range (generalist lineages) and lineages with a narrow host range (specialist lineages). Generalist lineages included the monophasic S. Typhimurium ST34 lineage (49), DT104 complex lineage (50), and DT193 complex lineage (14); however, specialist lineages contained the DT204 complex lineage primarily associated with cattle (51), the U288 complex lineage possibly adapted to pigs (52), the human-adapted ST313 lineage that causes invasive salmonellosis in sub-Saharan Africa (53, 54), and the seven lineages linked to specific bird types. By incorporating the host information into the cgSNP-based ML phylogenetic tree, we therefore were able to correlate individual lineages with specific host species (Fig. 4). It should be noted that generalist and specialist lineages are proposed in this study based on previous epidemiologic studies (9, 14), and lineages with a narrow host range can occasionally infect other hosts (11, 52, 5559), indicating that adaptation of these lineages is still at an initial stage.

Genomic comparison of S. Typhimurium lineages from avian and other diverse hosts.

To explore the genetic diversity of S. Typhimurium variants, we performed comparative genomic analyses of the 207 genomes from avian hosts and 83 contextual genomes from other diverse hosts (humans, pigs, cattle, and poultry). Pangenome analysis showed that the number of core genes (genes present in ≥99% isolates) shared by isolates within a specific lineage (henceforth referred to as lineage-associated core genes) ranged from 4,147 to 4,381, with the lowest being passerine lineage 1 and the highest being the DT104 complex lineage (Fig. 5A; Data Set S4). Isolates from all 13 lineages shared 3,798 core genes, which we referred to as S. Typhimurium core genes. This number is smaller than previous estimates (3,836 or 3,910 core genes) (60, 61), possibly due to the increased genetic diversity in our data set collection. It should also be noted that Roary, which tends to underestimate the number of core genes (62), was used for pangenome analysis in this study. By subtracting S. Typhimurium core genes from lineage-associated core genes, we calculated the number of core genes that represented a unique core-gene combination in a specific lineage (Fig. 5B). We further performed a pairwise comparison of lineage-associated core genes and found that individual lineages differed from one another by an average number of 194 unique core genes (Data Set S4). However, we did not find that avian host-associated lineages consistently presented much higher or lower numbers of unique core genes than lineages from other diverse hosts. In particular, passerine lineage 1 had the lowest average number of unique core genes (n = 123) relative to other lineages, while the water bird lineage had the highest number (n = 265) (Fig. S6).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Genetic diversity of Salmonella Typhimurium lineages from diverse hosts (n = 290). (A) Number of core genes (genes present in ≥99% isolates of the analyzed data set), soft shell genes (genes present in 95 to 99% of isolates in the analyzed data set), shell genes (genes present in 15 to 95% of isolates in the analyzed data set), and cloud genes (genes present in 0 to 15% of isolates in the analyzed data set) per isolate in individual lineages. (B) Number of S. Typhimurium core genes (n = 3,798) and number of core genes that represent a unique core-gene combination in a specific lineage (see colored key). (C) Average number of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes per isolate in individual lineages. (D) Average number of plasmid replicons per isolate in individual lineages. The following are the numbers of isolates in each lineage: passerine lineage 1 (n = 59), passerine lineage 2 (n = 26), larid lineage (n = 33), duck/goose lineage (n = 23), pigeon lineage 1 (n = 17), pigeon lineage 2 (n = 21), water bird lineage (n = 28), ST313 lineage (n = 10), DT204 complex lineage (n = 9), U288 complex lineage (n = 20), ST34 lineage (n = 21), DT193 complex lineage (n = 9), and DT104 complex lineage (n = 14). Error bars represent standard error of the average number of a data set.

AMR profiling revealed that all the isolates from avian host-associated lineages except the duck/goose lineage lacked AMR genes (average number per isolate of 1) (Fig. 5C). The only AMR gene detected was aac(6′)-Iaa (Data Set S5), which is a chromosomally encoded cryptic gene (63). However, more AMR genes were detected in isolates from broad-host-range lineages (DT104, DT193, and ST34: average number per isolate of greater than 4) and lineages associated with humans (ST313: average number per isolate of ≈7) or specific livestock (DT204 and U288: average number per isolate of ≈2 and 8, respectively) (Fig. 5C).

Plasmid profiling revealed that most of the isolates from diverse lineages carried plasmid replicons IncFIB (70%; 203/290) and IncFII (74.5%; 216/290) (Data Set S6) that belong to the S. Typhimurium-specific virulence plasmid pSLT (64). However, both plasmid replicons were absent in all the isolates from passerine lineage 2 (n = 26) and the ST34 lineage (n = 21) (Data Set S6). As a result, isolates from the two lineages carried fewer plasmid replicons (average number per isolate of less than 1) than isolates from other lineages (average number per isolate of greater than 1) (Fig. 5D). Additionally, isolates from passerine lineage 1 and the DT193 complex lineage also tended to lose the two plasmid replicons (Data Set S6). Specifically, both IncFIB and IncFII were absent in 40% (23/59) of isolates from passerine lineage 1, while all the DT193 isolates (n = 9) lacked IncFIB, and two DT193 isolates lacked IncFII (Data Set S6).

Prevalence of virulence-associated genome degradation in avian host-associated S. Typhimurium lineages.

Our virulence profiling detected an average number of 114 to 116 virulence genes per isolate (Fig. 6A) for 9 out of the 13 lineages present in Fig. 4. The four lineages with fewer virulence genes per isolate were passerine lineage 1 (average number per isolate of ≈113), passerine lineage 2 (average number per isolate of ≈107), the ST34 lineage (average number per isolate of ≈107), and the DT193 complex lineage (average number per isolate of ≈113) (Fig. 6A). We further identified that the absent virulence genes were mostly encoded by pSLT, that is, pefABCD (plasmid-encoded fimbriae), rck (resistance to complement killing), and spvBCR (Salmonella plasmid virulence) (Data Set S7), which was consistent with the fact that isolates from these four lineages also completely or partially lacked pSLT replicons IncFIB or IncFII (Data Set S6). For chromosomally encoded virulence genes, we only detected a complete loss of type 3 secretion system (T3SS) effector genes gogB in the water bird lineage or sopA in the DT193 complex lineage (Data Set S7).

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Virulence gene profiles of Salmonella Typhimurium lineages from diverse hosts (n = 290). (A) Average number of virulence genes per isolate in individual lineages. Error bars represent standard error of the average number of a data set. (B) Number of virulence genes with identical mutations in individual lineages. (C) Heatmap showing the mutation types of virulence genes in individual lineages. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of isolates from that specific lineage. “Multiple mutations” indicates that several mutations occur in a virulence gene at different positions. The detailed mutation information (mutation type, mutation position, and base pair change) of each virulence gene in individual lineages can be found in Data Set S8 in the supplemental material.

We also determined the number of chromosome-encoded virulence genes with identical mutations in individual lineages. Avian host-associated lineages and the ST313 lineage adapted to humans had more than 10 (duck/goose lineage, pigeon lineage 1, pigeon lineage 2, and ST313) or 20 (passerine lineage 1, passerine lineage 2, larid lineage, and water bird lineage) identical mutant virulence genes; however, the number was less than 10 for lineages with broad host range (DT104, DT193, and ST34) or associated with livestock (DT204 and U288) (Fig. 6B). The types of mutations (Data Set S8) were manually checked by aligning the virulence gene of interest against the reference virulence gene from S. Typhimurium LT2 (65) using BLAST. Among the 61 mutant chromosome-encoded virulence genes from different lineages, 47 were T3SS genes, 5 were curli genes (csgA, csgB, csgE, csgF, and csgG), 3 were type I fimbriae genes (fimC, fimH, and fimI), 2 were long polar fimbriae genes (lpfC and lpfD), and 4 were genes associated with other functions (mgtB, misL, ratB, and sodCl) (Fig. 6C; Data Set S8). The majority of mutations resulted from point mutations (SNPs) in T3SS genes, while a few virulence genes were subjected to deletions or multiple mutations (i.e., mutation occurs in more than one location in the gene) (Fig. 6C). We found that identical mutations in lpfC (substitution from C to T at position 328) and lpfD (deletion of GTTTGAGAAT at position 406 to 415) cooccurred in all specialist lineages except the water bird lineage (single base pair deletion in lpfC and intact lpfD) and the U288 complex lineage (intact lpfC and lpfD). Each avian host-associated variant also had lineage-specific mutations. For instance, single base pair deletion in fimC of passerine lineage 1, single base pair deletions in gogB, sseJ, and sseK2 of passerine lineage 2, SNPs in sptP and ssaQ of the larid lineage, a SNP in sodCl of the duck/goose lineage, SNPs in csgB, ssaD, and sseB of pigeon lineage 1, SNPs in prgH and sopE2 of pigeon lineage 2, and loss of gogB in the water bird lineage (Fig. 6C).

DISCUSSION

Overall, our WGS-based subtyping and analyses identify seven avian host-associated S. Typhimurium lineages and provide new insights into the population structure and genetic diversity of S. Typhimurium from diverse host species (i.e., humans, livestock, poultry, and wild birds). The avian host-associated lineages emerged over short timescales and present phylogenetic features (e.g., clustering based on bird type) and genetic traits (e.g., lack of AMR, lineage-specific virulence gene signatures) distinct from those formed by clinical isolates or isolates of domestic animal origin. Our findings suggest that some variants of this generalist serovar may be undergoing an adaptive evolution driven by host species. From a virulence perspective, we find that genome degradation through point mutations (mainly SNPs) and deletions is the molecular basis of host adaptation of S. Typhimurium to avian hosts.

Among the 344,387 Salmonella enterica genomes deposited at EnteroBase as of 10 January 2022, only 0.5% of the genomes (n = 1,880) were from avian hosts. Our group sequenced and uploaded 699 out of the 1,880 genomes, which included 414 genomes of serovar Typhimurium. Therefore, our study makes a substantial contribution to the understanding of S. Typhimurium diversity with the identification of three new lineages associated with avian hosts (i.e., passerine lineage 1, larid lineage, and water bird lineage). Previous work on S. Typhimurium population structure focused on specific lineages formed by isolates from humans and domestic animals, and the geographic locations of these isolates were restricted to certain countries or regions (14, 49, 50, 5254, 66). As a result, the genetic diversity of this bacterial pathogen was underestimated due to a lack of representative isolates from wild animals, and the phylogenetic relationship of individual lineages remains largely unexplored on a global scale. Our study not only reveals the population structure of 787 avian isolates collected from 18 countries over a 75-year period but also explores the genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship of globally sourced S. Typhimurium from diverse hosts.

As a prototype of generalist bacterial pathogens, S. Typhimurium can colonize and cause diseases in a variety of host species (67). However, the identification of seven avian host-associated S. Typhimurium lineages indicates that some variants of serovar Typhimurium have adapted to specific avian host species. Previous studies also reported that the DT204 and U288 complex lineages of S. Typhimurium were mainly restricted to cattle and pigs, respectively (51, 52), and the ST313 lineage of S. Typhimurium was adapted to humans (53, 54). Therefore, it is more accurate to describe serovar Typhimurium as a collection of variants with different host range and degrees of host adaptation. The strong correlation between S. Typhimurium variants and specific hosts suggests that within-host evolution (host niche) is the primary driver in shaping host specificity of S. Typhimurium. Further, we did not find an association between avian isolates and geographic locations at a lineage level. However, within some specific avian host-associated lineages, avian isolates from the same country clustered together to form a sublineage, indicating that geographic location (disperse limitation) serves as a less important evolutionary driver than host niche. The seven avian host-associated lineages emerged between 1826 and 1969, which occurred well after the divergence time of avian host groups (42, 43). Similarly, the human-adapted ST313 sublineages L1, L2, and L3 in sub-Saharan Africa dated to around 1950, 1948, and 2007, respectively (54). Collectively, these results support that host adaptation of S. Typhimurium is likely to be a relatively recent and ongoing process subjected to anthropogenic influence (e.g., globalization and antibiotic usage).

AMR profiles of S. Typhimurium lineages from diverse host species provide further evidence demonstrating the importance of host niches and anthropogenic activities in bacterial evolution. Our study shows that S. Typhimurium variants associated with avian hosts carried few AMR genes, while variants from humans or domestic animals had an average number of 2 to 8 AMR genes per isolate. Isolates that evolved within avian hosts may be less likely to develop AMR as wild birds are rarely exposed to antibiotics in the natural environments; conversely, isolates from humans and domestic animals carry high numbers of AMR genes as the host species are frequently subjected to antibiotics, thus putting selective pressure on the colonized bacterial pathogens.

Genome degradation or loss-of-function mutation is a common pattern in adaptive evolution of Salmonella (68). For example, loss or inactivation of fimbriae is linked to host adaptation (69, 70). Compared to the host generalist serovar Enteritidis, host specialist serovars such as Dublin and Gallinarum accumulate more pseudogenes that lead to loss of fimbriae (68). In this study, pseudogenization of the same fimbrial virulence gene network (lpfC and lpfD) due to deletion mutation was found in all specialist lineages except the U288 complex lineage, suggesting that inactivation of Lpf fimbriae may play an important role in the transition of serovar Typhimurium from generalist to specialist. Additionally, it is reported that a group of T3SS effector proteins (SseL, SifB, SopD2, SseJ, SteB, SteC, SlrP, and SseK2) is frequently present in generalist serovars but loses functions in specialist serovars (71). Similarly, we observed that more SNPs and deletions were accumulated in T3SS effector genes from host-associated lineages, which include, but are not limited to, sseL, sifB, sopD2, sseJ, steC, slrP, and sseK2. It is likely that allelic variations in these T3SS effector genes may contribute to host specificity of S. Typhimurium.

A limitation of this study is the scarcity of S. Typhimurium isolates from avian hosts. Current WGS-based surveillance of bacterial pathogens primarily focuses on isolates from clinical samples, food samples, livestock, and poultry; however, isolates from wildlife have not been routinely collected and sequenced. As indicated in this study, wild animals such as wild birds represent remarkable but less studied reservoirs for emerging variants of bacterial pathogens. Epidemiologic studies have also revealed a correlation between some human and avian salmonellosis outbreaks, suggesting transmission of bacterial pathogens between wild birds and humans (5559). Although such transmission is rare relative to transmission between humans and humans or between humans and domestic animals (72, 73), they can still have a substantial impact on global health as avian hosts are highly mobile and possibly carry and spread bacterial pathogens over large distances (44, 45). In a One Health framework, current surveillance of bacterial pathogens needs to be focused not only on clinical isolates or isolates from domestic animals but also on those originating from wild animals. We also note that the sequencing data in our collection are skewed toward S. Typhimurium isolates from North America, followed by Europe and Oceania, which is consistent with the fact that WGS has been widely used by countries (e.g., the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia) from these continents for surveillance of bacterial pathogens (74). However, the state-of-the-art technology is less adopted in Asia, Africa, and South America, mostly due to economic reasons (75). Emerging epidemic lineages of bacterial pathogens may be circulating in these countries but are underrepresented in current public repositories. Therefore, a global research collaboration is required to generate a robust and informative set of sequencing data to represent bacterial pathogens and their variants that cause diseases worldwide.

In conclusion, we reveal the population structure and genetic diversity of S. Typhimurium in avian and other diverse hosts. Our results indicate that within-host evolution has resulted in multiple host-associated S. Typhimurium lineages, which present genetic traits distinct from lineages with broader host range. Although our WGS-based subtyping and analyses are focused on serovar Typhimurium, the approach is translatable to other bacterial pathogens. It is expected that other generalist Salmonella serovars or bacterial pathogens such as E. coli and Campylobacter spp. that commonly colonize wild birds may have also undergone a similar adaptive evolution within avian hosts. Identifying these emerging host-associated variants and understanding the genetic basis of host adaptation will facilitate epidemiologic investigation, provide insight into the pathogenicity potential of the strain, and help design effective infection treatment/control strategies. For example, the lineage-specific mutations in virulence genes of avian host-associated lineages can serve as genetic markers for source tracking, and lack of AMR genes in avian host-associated S. Typhimurium variants means that antibiotics may treat the infection. Further, genome degradation in virulence genes may attenuate the pathogenicity of these variants to humans, making them of potential interest to study as vaccine candidates.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank David Hewitt for editing the manuscript before publication. This work is supported by the US Food and Drug Administration (grant number 1U19FD007114-01), US Department of Agriculture (grant number PEN4522), and Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences.

Y.F. designed the study, sequenced the US wild bird isolates, collected the globally sourced sequence data from EnteroBase, NCBI, and EMBL-EBI, performed the bioinformatics analyses of the data, interpreted the data, and wrote the draft manuscript. N.M.M. and E.G.D. contributed to interpretation of the data and manuscript revision.

We declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 9
Fig. S1 to S6. Download jcm.01847-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 2.6 MB (2.6MB, pdf)
Supplemental file 1
Data S1. Download jcm.01847-22-s0002.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.08 MB (79KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 2
Data S2. Download jcm.01847-22-s0003.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.02 MB (23.4KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 3
Data S3. Download jcm.01847-22-s0004.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (13.7KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 4
Data S4. Download jcm.01847-22-s0005.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.02 MB (22.7KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 5
Data S5. Download jcm.01847-22-s0006.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.04 MB (45.1KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 6
Data S6. Download jcm.01847-22-s0007.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.03 MB (35.9KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 7
Data S7. Download jcm.01847-22-s0008.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.2 MB (229.1KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 8
Data S8. Download jcm.01847-22-s0009.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.02 MB (18.5KB, xlsx)

Contributor Information

Yezhi Fu, Email: yff5072@psu.edu.

Edward G. Dudley, Email: egd100@psu.edu.

Alexander Mellmann, Westfalische Wilhelms-Universitat Munster.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Knodler LA, Elfenbein JR. 2019. Salmonella enterica. Trends Microbiol 27:964–965. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2019.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stanaway JD, Parisi A, Sarkar K, Blacker BF, Reiner RC, Hay SI, Nixon MR, Dolecek C, James SL, Mokdad AH, Abebe G, Ahmadian E, Alahdab F, Alemnew BTT, Alipour V, Allah Bakeshei F, Animut MD, Ansari F, Arabloo J, Asfaw ET, Bagherzadeh M, Bassat Q, Belayneh YMM, Carvalho F, Daryani A, Demeke FM, Demis ABB, Dubey M, Duken EE, Dunachie SJ, Eftekhari A, Fernandes E, Fouladi Fard R, Gedefaw GA, Geta B, Gibney KB, Hasanzadeh A, Hoang CL, Kasaeian A, Khater A, Kidanemariam ZT, Lakew AM, Malekzadeh R, Melese A, Mengistu DT, Mestrovic T, Miazgowski B, Mohammad KA, Mohammadian M, Mohammadian-Hafshejani A, et al. 2019. The global burden of non-typhoidal Salmonella invasive disease: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect Dis 19:1312–1324. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30418-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grimont PA, Weill FX. 2007. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars, 9th ed. WHO; Collaborating Centre for Salmonella: Paris, France. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kingsley RA, Bäumler AJ. 2000. Host adaptation and the emergence of infectious disease: the Salmonella paradigm. Mol Microbiol 36:1006–1014. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01907.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roumagnac P, Weill FX, Dolecek C, Baker S, Brisse S, Chinh NT, Le TA, Acosta CJ, Farrar J, Dougan G, Achtman M. 2006. Evolutionary history of Salmonella Typhi. Science 314:1301–1304. doi: 10.1126/science.1134933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dougan G, Baker S. 2014. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and the pathogenesis of typhoid fever. Annu Rev Microbiol 68:317–336. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-091313-103739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tanner JR, Kingsley RA. 2018. Evolution of Salmonella within hosts. Trends Microbiol 26:986–998. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kingsley RA, Kay S, Connor T, Barquist L, Sait L, Holt KE, Sivaraman K, Wileman T, Goulding D, Clare S, Hale C, Seshasayee A, Harris S, Thomson NR, Gardner P, Rabsch W, Wigley P, Humphrey T, Parkhill J, Dougan G. 2013. Genome and transcriptome adaptation accompanying emergence of the definitive type 2 host-restricted Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium Pathovar. mBio 4:e00565-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00565-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rabsch W, Andrews HL, Kingsley RA, Prager R, Tschäpe H, Adams LG, Bäumler AJ. 2002. Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium and its host-adapted variants. Infect Immun 70:2249–2255. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.5.2249-2255.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mather AE, Lawson B, de Pinna E, Wigley P, Parkhill J, Thomson NR, Page AJ, Holmes MA, Paterson GK. 2016. Genomic analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium from wild passerines in England and Wales. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:6728–6735. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01660-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fu Y, M’ikanatha NM, Lorch JM, Blehert DS, Berlowski-Zier B, Whitehouse CA, Li S, Deng X, Smith JC, Shariat NW, Nawrocki EM, Dudley EG. 2022. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium from wild birds in the United States represent distinct lineages defined by bird type. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:e01979-21. doi: 10.1128/aem.01979-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Didelot X, Walker AS, Peto TE, Crook DW, Wilson DJ. 2016. Within-host evolution of bacterial pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:150–162. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2015.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gatt YE, Margalit H. 2021. Common adaptive strategies underlie within-host evolution of bacterial pathogens. Mol Biol Evol 38:1101–1121. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bawn M, Alikhan NF, Thilliez G, Kirkwood M, Wheeler NE, Petrovska L, Dallman TJ, Adriaenssens EM, Hall N, Kingsley RA. 2020. Evolution of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium driven by anthropogenic selection and niche adaptation. PLoS Genet 16:e1008850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sheppard SK, Colles FM, McCarthy ND, Strachan NJ, Ogden ID, Forbes KJ, Dallas JF, Maiden MC. 2011. Niche segregation and genetic structure of Campylobacter jejuni populations from wild and agricultural host species. Mol Ecol 20:3484–3490. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05179.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schwartz DC, Cantor CR. 1984. Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis. Cell 37:67–75. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90301-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hunter SB, Vauterin P, Lambert-Fair MA, Van Duyne MS, Kubota K, Graves L, Wrigley D, Barrett T, Ribot E. 2005. Establishment of a universal size standard strain for use with the PulseNet standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols: converting the national databases to the new size standard. J Clin Microbiol 43:1045–1050. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.3.1045-1050.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maiden MC, Bygraves JA, Feil E, Morelli G, Russell JE, Urwin R, Zhang Q, Zhou J, Zurth K, Caugant DA, Feavers IM, Achtman M, Spratt BG. 1998. Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:3140–3145. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.6.3140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Achtman M, Wain J, Weill FX, Nair S, Zhou Z, Sangal V, Krauland MG, Hale JL, Harbottle H, Uesbeck A, Dougan G, Harrison LH, Brisse S, S. Enterica MLST Study Group . 2012. Multilocus sequence typing as a replacement for serotyping in Salmonella enterica. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002776. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Callow BR. 1959. A new phage-typing scheme for Salmonella Typhimurium. J Hyg (Lond) 57:346–359. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400020209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Neoh HM, Tan XE, Sapri HF, Tan TL. 2019. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE): a review of the “gold standard” for bacteria typing and current alternatives. Infect Genet Evol 74:103935. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.103935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sheppard SK, Guttman DS, Fitzgerald JR. 2018. Population genomics of bacterial host adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 19:549–565. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0032-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schürch AC, Arredondo-Alonso S, Willems RJL, Goering RV. 2018. Whole genome sequencing options for bacterial strain typing and epidemiologic analysis based on single nucleotide polymorphism versus gene-by-gene-based approaches. Clin Microbiol Infect 24:350–354. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Denamur E, Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, Gordon D. 2021. The population genetics of pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:37–54. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0416-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Castillo-Ramírez S. 2022. Beyond microbial core genomic epidemiology: towards pan genomic epidemiology. Lancet Microbe 3:e244–e245. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00058-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fu Y, M'ikanatha NM, Whitehouse CA, Tate H, Ottesen A, Lorch JM, Blehert DS, Berlowski-Zier B, Dudley EG. 2022. Low occurrence of multi-antimicrobial and heavy metal resistance in Salmonella enterica from wild birds in the United States. Environ Microbiol 24:1380–1394. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Branchu P, Bawn M, Kingsley RA. 2018. Genome variation and molecular epidemiology of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium pathovariants. Infect Immun 86:e00079-18. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00079-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stevens MP, Kingsley RA. 2021. Salmonella pathogenesis and host-adaptation in farmed animals. Curr Opin Microbiol 63:52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2021.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Timme RE, Wolfgang WJ, Balkey M, Venkata SLG, Randolph R, Allard M, Strain E. 2020. Optimizing open data to support one health: best practices to ensure interoperability of genomic data from bacterial pathogens. One Health Outlook 2:20. doi: 10.1186/s42522-020-00026-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhou Z, Alikhan NF, Mohamed K, Fan Y, Achtman M, Agama Study Group . 2020. The EnteroBase user’s guide, with case studies on Salmonella transmissions, Yersinia pestis phylogeny, and Escherichia core genomic diversity. Genome Res 30:138–152. doi: 10.1101/gr.251678.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rambaut A, Lam TT, Max Carvalho L, Pybus OG. 2016. Exploring the temporal structure of heterochronous sequences using TempEst (formerly Path-O-Gen). Virus Evol 2:vew007. doi: 10.1093/ve/vew007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bouckaert R, Vaughan TG, Barido-Sottani J, Duchêne S, Fourment M, Gavryushkina A, Heled J, Jones G, Kühnert D, De Maio N, Matschiner M, Mendes FK, Müller NF, Ogilvie HA, Du Plessis L, Popinga A, Rambaut A, Rasmussen D, Siveroni I, Suchard MA, Wu CH, Xie D, Zhang C, Stadler T, Drummond AJ. 2019. BEAST 2.5: an advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 15:e1006650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Russel PM, Brewer BJ, Klaere S, Bouckaert RR. 2019. Model selection and parameter inference in phylogenetics using nested sampling. Syst Biol 68:219–233. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syy050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Seemann T. 2017. Shovill: faster SPAdes assembly of Illumina reads. https://github.com/tseemann/shovill. Accessed 18 March 2022.
  • 36.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MT, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pangenome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Seemann T. 2016. ABRicate: mass screening of contigs for antibiotic resistance genes. https://github.com/tseemann/abricate. Accessed 18 March 2022.
  • 39.Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, Cattoir V, Philippon A, Allesoe RL, Rebelo AR, Florensa AF, Fagelhauer L, Chakraborty T, Neumann B, Werner G, Bender JK, Stingl K, Nguyen M, Coppens J, Xavier BB, Malhotra-Kumar S, Westh H, Pinholt M, Anjum MF, Duggett NA, Kempf I, Nykäsenoja S, Olkkola S, Wieczorek K, Amaro A, Clemente L, Mossong J, Losch S, Ragimbeau C, Lund O, Aarestrup FM. 2020. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Møller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liu B, Zheng DD, Jin Q, Chen LH, Yang J. 2019. VFDB 2019: a comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D687–D692. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jarvis ED, Mirarab S, Aberer AJ, Li B, Houde P, Li C, Ho SYW, Faircloth BC, Nabholz B, Howard JT, Suh A, Weber CC, da Fonseca RR, Li J, Zhang F, Li H, Zhou L, Narula N, Liu L, Ganapathy G, Boussau B, Bayzid MS, Zavidovych V, Subramanian S, Gabaldón T, Capella-Gutiérrez S, Huerta-Cepas J, Rekepalli B, Munch K, Schierup M, Lindow B, Warren WC, Ray D, Green RE, Bruford MW, Zhan X, Dixon A, Li S, Li N, Huang Y, Derryberry EP, Bertelsen MF, Sheldon FH, Brumfield RT, Mello CV, Lovell PV, Wirthlin M, Schneider MPC, Prosdocimi F, Samaniego JA, et al. 2014. Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 346:1320–1331. doi: 10.1126/science.1253451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Prum RO, Berv JS, Dornburg A, Field DJ, Townsend JP, Lemmon EM, Lemmon AR. 2015. A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature 526:569–573. doi: 10.1038/nature15697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fu Y, Smith JC, Shariat NW, M’ikanatha NM, Dudley EG. 2022. Evidence for common ancestry and microevolution of passerine-adapted Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in the UK and USA. Microb Genom 8:e000775. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fu Y, M’ikanatha NM, Dudley EG. 2022. Comparative genomic analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium isolates from passerines reveals two lineages circulating in Europe, New Zealand, and the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:e00205-22. doi: 10.1128/aem.00205-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Castillo-Ramírez S, Graña-Miraglia L. 2019. Inaccurate multilocus sequence typing of Acinetobacter baumannii. Emerg Infect Dis 25:186–187. doi: 10.3201/eid2501.180374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Makendi C, Page AJ, Wren BW, Le Thi Phuong T, Clare S, Hale C, Goulding D, Klemm EJ, Pickard D, Okoro C, Hunt M, Thompson CN, Phu Huong Lan N, Tran Do Hoang N, Thwaites GE, Le Hello S, Brisabois A, Weill FX, Baker S, Dougan G. 2016. A phylogenetic and phenotypic analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Weltevreden, an emerging agent of diarrheal disease in tropical regions. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10:e0004446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Okoro C, Kingsley RA, Connor TR, Harris SR, Parry CM, Al-Mashhadani MN, Kariuki S, Msefula CL, Gordon MA, de Pinna E, Wain J, Heyderman RS, Obaro S, Alonso PL, Mandomando I, MacLennan CA, Tapia MD, Levine MM, Tennant SM, Parkhill J, Dougan G. 2012. Intracontinental spread of human invasive Salmonella Typhimurium pathovariants in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat Genet 44:1215–1221. doi: 10.1038/ng.2423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Petrovska L, Mather AE, AbuOun M, Branchu P, Harris SR, Connor T, Hopkins KL, Underwood A, Lettini AA, Page A, Bagnall M, Wain J, Parkhill J, Dougan G, Davies R, Kingsley RA. 2016. Microevolution of monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium during epidemic, United Kingdom, 2005–2010. Emerg Infect Dis 22:617–624. doi: 10.3201/eid2204.150531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mather AE, Reid SW, Maskell DJ, Parkhill J, Fookes MC, Harris SR, Brown DJ, Coia JE, Mulvey MR, Gilmour MW, Petrovska L, de Pinna E, Kuroda M, Akiba M, Izumiya H, Connor TR, Suchard MA, Lemey P, Mellor DJ, Haydon DT, Thomson NR. 2013. Distinguishable epidemics of multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 in different hosts. Science 341:1514–1517. doi: 10.1126/science.1240578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Threlfall EJ, Ward LR, Rowe B. 1978. Spread of multiresistant strains of Salmonella typhimurium phage types 204 and 193 in Britain. Br Med J 2:997. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6143.997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kirkwood M, Vohra P, Bawn M, Thilliez G, Pye H, Tanner J, Chintoan-Uta C, Branchu P, Petrovska L, Dallman T, Hall N, Stevens MP, Kingsley RA. 2021. Ecological niche adaptation of Salmonella Typhimurium U288 is associated with altered pathogenicity and reduced zoonotic potential. Commun Biol 4:498. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02013-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Van Puyvelde S, Pickard D, Vandelannoote K, Heinz E, Barbé B, de Block T, Clare S, Coomber EL, Harcourt K, Sridhar S, Lees EA, Wheeler NE, Klemm EJ, Kuijpers L, Mbuyi Kalonji L, Phoba MF, Falay D, Ngbonda D, Lunguya O, Jacobs J, Dougan G, Deborggraeve S. 2019. An African Salmonella Typhimurium ST313 sublineage with extensive drug-resistance and signatures of host adaptation. Nat Commun 10:4280. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11844-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pulford CV, Perez-Sepulveda BM, Canals R, Bevington JA, Bengtsson RJ, Wenner N, Rodwell EV, Kumwenda B, Zhu X, Bennett RJ, Stenhouse GE, Malaka De Silva P, Webster HJ, Bengoechea JA, Dumigan A, Tran-Dien A, Prakash R, Banda HC, Alufandika L, Mautanga MP, Bowers-Barnard A, Beliavskaia AY, Predeus AV, Rowe WPM, Darby AC, Hall N, Weill FX, Gordon MA, Feasey NA, Baker KS, Hinton JCD. 2021. Stepwise evolution of Salmonella Typhimurium ST313 causing bloodstream infection in Africa. Nat Microbiol 6:327–338. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00836-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hernandez SM, Keel K, Sanchez S, Trees E, Gerner-Smidt P, Adams JK, Cheng Y, Ray A III, Martin G, Presotto A, Ruder MG, Brown J, Blehert DS, Cottrell W, Maurer JJ. 2012. Epidemiology of a Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium strain associated with a songbird outbreak. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:7290–7298. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01408-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lawson B, de Pinna E, Horton RA, Macgregor SK, John SK, Chantrey J, Duff JP, Kirkwood JK, Simpson VR, Robinson RA, Wain J, Cunningham AA. 2014. Epidemiological evidence that garden birds are a source of human salmonellosis in England and Wales. PLoS One 9:e88968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bloomfield SJ, Benschop J, Biggs PJ, Marshall JC, Hayman DTS, Carter PE, Midwinter AC, Mather AE, French NP. 2017. Genomic analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT160 associated with a 14-year outbreak, New Zealand, 1998–2012. Emerg Infect Dis 23:906–913. doi: 10.3201/eid2306.161934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ford L, Ingle D, Glass K, Veitch M, Williamson DA, Harlock M, Gregory J, Stafford R, French N, Bloomfield S, Grange Z, Conway ML, Kirk MD. 2019. Whole-genome sequencing of Salmonella Mississippi and Typhimurium definitive type 160, Australia and New Zealand. Emerg Infect Dis 25:1690–1697. doi: 10.3201/eid2509.181811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Söderlund R, Jernberg C, Trönnberg L, Pääjärvi A, Ågren E, Lahti E. 2019. Linked seasonal outbreaks of Salmonella Typhimurium among passerine birds, domestic cats and humans, Sweden, 2009 to 2016. Euro Surveill 24:1900074. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.34.1900074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hayden HS, Matamouros S, Hager KR, Brittnacher MJ, Rohmer L, Radey MC, Weiss EJ, Kim KB, Jacobs MA, Sims-Day EH, Yue M, Zaidi MB, Schifferli DM, Manning SD, Walson JL, Miller SI. 2016. Genomic analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium characterizes strain diversity for recent US salmonellosis cases and identifies mutations linked to loss of fitness under nitrosative and oxidative stress. mBio 7:e00154. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00154-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fu S, Hiley L, Octavia S, Tanaka MM, Sintchenko V, Lan R. 2017. Comparative genomics of Australian and international isolates of Salmonella Typhimurium: correlation of core genome evolution with CRISPR and prophage profiles. Sci Rep 7:9733. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06079-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tonkin-Hill G, MacAlasdair N, Ruis C, Weimann A, Horesh G, Lees JA, Gladstone RA, Lo S, Beaudoin C, Floto RA, Frost SDW, Corander J, Bentley SD, Parkhill J. 2020. Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline. Genome Biol 21:180. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02090-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Salipante SJ, Hall BG. 2003. Determining the limits of the evolutionary potential of an antibiotic resistance gene. Mol Biol Evol 20:653–659. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hiley L, Graham RM, Jennison AV. 2019. Genetic characterisation of variants of the virulence plasmid, pSLT, in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium provides evidence of a variety of evolutionary directions consistent with vertical rather than horizontal transmission. PLoS One 14:e0215207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.McClelland M, Sanderson KE, Spieth J, Clifton SW, Latreille P, Courtney L, Porwollik S, Ali J, Dante M, Du F, Hou S, Layman D, Leonard S, Nguyen C, Scott K, Holmes A, Grewal N, Mulvaney E, Ryan E, Sun H, Florea L, Miller W, Stoneking T, Nhan M, Waterston R, Wilson RK. 2001. Complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. Nature 413:852–856. doi: 10.1038/35101614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ingle DJ, Ambrose RL, Baines SL, Duchene S, Gonçalves da Silva A, Lee DYJ, Jones M, Valcanis M, Taiaroa G, Ballard SA, Kirk MD, Howden BP, Pearson JS, Williamson DA. 2021. Evolutionary dynamics of multidrug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i:- in Australia. Nat Commun 12:4786. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25073-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bäumler A, Fang FC. 2013. Host specificity of bacterial pathogens. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 3:a010041. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a010041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Langridge GC, Fookes M, Connor TR, Feltwell T, Feasey N, Parsons BN, Seth-Smith HM, Barquist L, Stedman A, Humphrey T, Wigley P, Peters SE, Maskell DJ, Corander J, Chabalgoity JA, Barrow P, Parkhill J, Dougan G, Thomson NR. 2015. Patterns of genome evolution that have accompanied host adaptation in Salmonella. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:863–868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416707112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Thomson NR, Clayton DJ, Windhorst D, Vernikos G, Davidson S, Churcher C, Quail MA, Stevens M, Jones MA, Watson M, Barron A, Layton A, Pickard D, Kingsley RA, Bignell A, Clark L, Harris B, Ormond D, Abdellah Z, Brooks K, Cherevach I, Chillingworth T, Woodward J, Norberczak H, Lord A, Arrowsmith C, Jagels K, Moule S, Mungall K, Sanders M, Whitehead S, Chabalgoity JA, Maskell D, Humphrey T, Roberts M, Barrow PA, Dougan G, Parkhill J. 2008. Comparative genome analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 and Salmonella Gallinarum 287/91 provides insights into evolutionary and host adaptation pathways. Genome Res 18:1624–1637. doi: 10.1101/gr.077404.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yue M, Han X, De Masi L, Zhu C, Ma X, Zhang J, Wu R, Schmieder R, Kaushik RS, Fraser GP, Zhao S, McDermott PF, Weill FX, Mainil JG, Arze C, Fricke WF, Edwards RA, Brisson D, Zhang NR, Rankin SC, Schifferli DM. 2015. Allelic variation contributes to bacterial host specificity. Nat Commun 6:8754. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jennings E, Thurston TL, Holden DW. 2017. Salmonella SPI-2 type III secretion system effectors: molecular mechanisms and physiological consequences. Cell Host Microbe 22:217–231. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Smith OM, Snyder WE, Owen JP. 2020. Are we overestimating risk of enteric pathogen spillover from wild birds to humans? Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 95:652–679. doi: 10.1111/brv.12581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Muloi DM, Wee BA, McClean DMH, Ward MJ, Pankhurst L, Phan H, Ivens AC, Kivali V, Kiyong'a A, Ndinda C, Gitahi N, Ouko T, Hassell JM, Imboma T, Akoko J, Murungi MK, Njoroge SM, Muinde P, Nakamura Y, Alumasa L, Furmaga E, Kaitho T, Öhgren EM, Amanya F, Ogendo A, Wilson DJ, Bettridge JM, Kiiru J, Kyobutungi C, Tacoli C, Kang'ethe EK, Davila JD, Kariuki S, Robinson TP, Rushton J, Woolhouse MEJ, Fèvre EM. 2022. Population genomics of Escherichia coli in livestock-keeping households across a rapidly developing urban landscape. Nat Microbiol 7:581–589. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01079-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Armstrong GL, MacCannell DR, Taylor J, Carleton HA, Neuhaus EB, Bradbury RS, Posey JE, Gwinn M. 2019. Pathogen genomics in public health. N Engl J Med 381:2569–2580. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1813907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Perez-Sepulveda BM, Heavens D, Pulford CV, Predeus AV, Low R, Webster H, Dykes GF, Schudoma C, Rowe W, Lipscombe J, Watkins C, Kumwenda B, Shearer N, Costigan K, Baker KS, Feasey NA, Hinton JCD, Hall N, 10KSG consortium . 2021. An accessible, efficient and global approach for the large-scale sequencing of bacterial genomes. Genome Biol 22:349. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02536-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 9

Fig. S1 to S6. Download jcm.01847-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 2.6 MB (2.6MB, pdf)

Supplemental file 1

Data S1. Download jcm.01847-22-s0002.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.08 MB (79KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 2

Data S2. Download jcm.01847-22-s0003.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.02 MB (23.4KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 3

Data S3. Download jcm.01847-22-s0004.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (13.7KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 4

Data S4. Download jcm.01847-22-s0005.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.02 MB (22.7KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 5

Data S5. Download jcm.01847-22-s0006.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.04 MB (45.1KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 6

Data S6. Download jcm.01847-22-s0007.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.03 MB (35.9KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 7

Data S7. Download jcm.01847-22-s0008.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.2 MB (229.1KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 8

Data S8. Download jcm.01847-22-s0009.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.02 MB (18.5KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

Sequence data of the S. Typhimurium isolates from our lab (isolate name in the format “PSU-4 digits,” for example, PSU-2718) are deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) under BioProject PRJNA357723. Publicly available sequence data were downloaded from EnteroBase (https://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/), NCBI SRA (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra), and the European Nucleotide Archive (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena). Accession numbers of the genomes used in this study are listed in Data Sets S1 to S3.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES