Skip to main content
Public Health Nutrition logoLink to Public Health Nutrition
. 2013 Feb 1;17(1):233–239. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000086

Obesity prevalence in Mexico: impact on health and economic burden

Ketevan Rtveladze 1,*, Tim Marsh 1, Simon Barquera 2, Luz Maria Sanchez Romero 2, David Levy 3, Guillermo Melendez 4, Laura Webber 1, Fanny Kilpi 1, Klim McPherson 5, Martin Brown 1
PMCID: PMC10282205  PMID: 23369462

Abstract

Objective

Along with other countries having high and low-to-middle income, Mexico has experienced a substantial change in obesity rates. This rapid growth in obesity prevalence has led to high rates of obesity-related diseases and associated health-care costs.

Design

Micro-simulation is used to project future BMI trends. Additionally thirteen BMI-related diseases and health-care costs are estimated. The results are simulated for three hypothetical scenarios: no BMI reduction and BMI reductions of 1 % and 5 % across the population.

Setting

Mexican Health and Nutrition Surveys 1999 and 2000, and Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2006.

Subjects

Mexican adults.

Results

In 2010, 32 % of men and 26 % of women were normal weight. By 2050, the proportion of normal weight will decrease to 12 % and 9 % for males and females respectively, and more people will be obese than overweight. It is projected that by 2050 there will be 12 million cumulative incidence cases of diabetes and 8 million cumulative incidence cases of heart disease alone. For the thirteen diseases considered, costs of $US 806 million are estimated for 2010, projected to increase to $US 1·2 billion and $US 1·7 billion in 2030 and 2050 respectively. A 1 % reduction in BMI prevalence could save $US 43 million in health-care costs in 2030 and $US 85 million in 2050.

Conclusions

Obesity rates are leading to a large health and economic burden. The projected numbers are high and Mexico should implement strong action to tackle obesity. Results presented here will be very helpful in planning and implementing policy interventions.

Keywords: Obesity, Mexico, Health care, Cost, Economic


Mexico has experienced a rapid increase in wealth in recent decades, bringing a significant shift in socio-economic status and a geographical shift from rural to urban among its population. This has led to changes in diet that are detrimental to health: an increase in sedentary behaviour and increased access to low-priced highly energy-dense foods. As a result, rapid growth in the prevalence of obesity and obesity-related non-communicable diseases (NCD) has been observed with a lack of prevention programmes to curb this rise. A significant increase in obesity was reported between 2000 and 2006( 1 ) and is expected to impose a substantial burden in terms of disease outcomes and health-care costs. Nutrition-related chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension are associated with increased obesity rates( 2 ). CVD and type 2 diabetes are now considered the main causes of adult mortality in Mexico( 1 ). According to the Ministry of Health, the number one leading cause of mortality in 2008 was diabetes (14 %), followed by IHD (11 %) and stroke (5·6 %). When the mortality prevalence of the different types of cancers was combined, it became the third most common cause of mortality( 3 ).

In 2004, NCD caused 75 % of the total deaths and 68 % of total disability-adjusted life years in Mexico( 4 ). Overweight and obesity are the main risk factor for a larger burden of NCD. According to a report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, for every extra 15 kg, the probability of early death increases by 30 %( 5 ). In 2008, the loss of productivity due to early death that is attributable to overweight and obesity in Mexico was $US 1931 million. The total direct cost estimated for the treatment of these co-morbidities (CVD, stroke, hypertension, cancer and diabetes mellitus) reached a total of $US 3·2 million, representing 33·2 % of the total health-care expenditure in 2008. This is an increase of 61 % from the cost in 2000( 6 ).

In the present paper, we map the trajectory of future obesity trends in Mexico to 2050 based a method that utilizes the best data currently available and that is already applied in the UK and the USA( 7 ). We measure the consequences of these trends on future incidence of disease and health-care costs. In addition, we estimate the impact of reducing obesity rates by 1 % and 5 % on the incidence of and mortality rates from obesity-related diseases. The estimates are of interest not only in Mexico, as one of the low- and middle-income nations with higher rates of obesity, but also are of interest to other low- and middle-income nations, especially in Latin America.

Design

BMI data

The BMI data (kg/m2) were obtained from the 2000 Mexican Health and Nutrition Survey (Encuesta Nacional en Salud (ESNA))( 8 ) and the 2006 Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey (Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición (ENSANUT))( 9 ). In addition, data from 1993 for males and females( 10 ) and from 1999 for females aged 20–49 only (Encuesta Nacional de Nutrición (ENN) 1999)( 11 ) were utilized to project obesity trends. Adult BMI distributions were distinguished by age and gender in three BMI categories: normal weight (≤24·9 kg/m2), overweight (25·0–29·9 kg/m2) and obese (≥30·0 kg/m2).

Disease data

A review of the epidemiological and academic literature was undertaken to determine the country-specific incidence, survival or case fatality rates and annual medical costs for the following, by age and sex: (i) type 2 diabetes, CHD (or IHD, myocardial infarction), stroke and knee osteoarthritis as obesity-related diseases; and (ii) cancer of the breast, kidney, colon/rectum, oesophagus, endometrium and gallbladder as obesity-related cancers. Relative risks (RR) by BMI for each disease were obtained from a systemic review of the epidemiological literature( 12 ). These RR were applied to the Mexican population, assuming that the risks do not differ from those in European populations. The population free of disease was assigned a probability of getting a specific disease defined by the RR at the beginning of a particular year. As a consequence, they might recover or be ill and die from the specified disease or from an unspecified cause. The development of disease is defined by survival statistics and life expectancy.

Some of the disease data, such as incidence and prevalence, were provided to us by our collaborators (diabetes, stroke, IHD and hypertension), but much of the requisite data could not be obtained during the duration of the study. Survival for CHD was not available; therefore we used myocardial infarction survival, calculated from case fatality figures and applied it to 1-year CHD survival, assuming that myocardial infarction and CHD have the same survival rate. Mortality both for CHD and stroke is from the WHO mortality and burden of disease estimates( 13 ).

Cancer incidence and mortality data were obtained from the GLOBOCAN Project 2008( 14 ); survival data were available only for two of them, breast and colorectal. For others, figures from the USA have been used( 7 ). We applied the US survival figures to Mexico, assuming they are the same within these two countries. No data on the incidence of knee osteoarthritis were available and so US data were used as a proxy to calculate Mexican figures. The disease rates reflect the obesity distribution of the originating country (the USA in this case). When using these data for another country, we removed the effect of the BMI distribution, taking the rates of the healthy individuals, and then used the obesity rates of the receiving country to calculate an estimate of the rates in Mexico.

The Mexican Institute of Social Security (Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social) provides detailed disease cost data. The costs are presented as unit costs, i.e. the cost of each patient during hospital admission( 15 ). However, the micro-simulation program only incorporates total costs for health care and per unit costs cannot be entered into the program at this stage. The evaluation methods of other published articles were different. In order to be consistent with the data estimations and to make costs more reliable, the US health-care costs were chosen and applied to Mexico by adjusting the disease ratios. Thus, the diabetes cost( 16 ) was taken as the constant and most reliable number from Mexico. The ratio (e.g. how many times higher one disease cost is than the other) of US health-care costs was applied to each disease. For example, the cost of diabetes in Mexico is ≈$US 2 billion; the costs of all diseases in the USA are known. To calculate the unknown cost for CHD in Mexico we take the cost of CHD in the USA (≈$US 132 billion) divided by the US diabetes cost ($US 132 billion/$US 109 billion = 1·211), then multiply this ratio with the Mexican diabetes cost (1·211 × $US 2 billion). The rough estimate of the CHD costs in Mexico is therefore $US 2·4 billion. All costs are for 2000 and are not inflated to the latest year or discounted. Costs are presented in $US.

Simulation model

We employed the two-stage modelling process developed by the UK Foresight working group( 17 19 ). In the first module, we fit multivariate, categorical regression models to the cross-sectional BMI data series. We included sex, age and calendar year as covariates and constrained the predicted proportions of the population for each BMI category. The cross-sectional data were used to construct longitudinal trajectories to 2050 by creating pseudo cohorts within the population. Size and age distributions were based on published projections from the UN population database( 20 ). We simulated 5 million individuals by sex and age, and scaled up the simulated population to reflect the total population of Mexico. The 95 % confidence interval for the projected prevalence was calculated from the Bayesian posterior distribution of the regression parameters. Further details of the two-part modelling process can be found elsewhere( 19 ).

For the present analyses, we reduced the BMI by a constant percentage across the whole population (1 % and 5 % in this case) to test the potential of the amended BMI prevalence. This is to say that everyone's BMI was reduced by 1 % or 5 % only in 2010, and it is then assumed that the trend will continue from the decreased level. Each simulation consisted of 5 million Monte Carlo( 21 ) trials.

Results

Obesity is projected to increase across all age groups. Particularly high levels are seen in middle-aged men (50–59 years) and older females (≥60 years), as shown in Table 1. As shown in Table 2, obesity rates are expected to increase for both males and females. In 2010, 68 % (41 % overweight and 27 % obese) of the male population is estimated to be overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25·0 kg/m2). The rate is expected to increase to 88 % (34 % overweight and 54 % obese) by 2050. An increase is also projected among females, with rates estimated at 74 % (37 % overweight and 37 % obese) in 2010 increasing to about 91 % by 2050 (34 % overweight and 57 % obese).

Table 1.

Projected trends in BMI (%) among Mexican adults by gender, age group and BMI group*

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Age (years) BMI ≤ 24·9 kg/m2 (normal weight) BMI = 25·0–29·9 kg/m2 (overweight) BMI ≥ 30·0 kg/m2 (obese) BMI ≤ 24·9 kg/m2 (normal weight) BMI = 25·0–29·9 kg/m2 (overweight) BMI ≥ 30·0 kg/m2 (obese) BMI ≤ 24·9 kg/m2 (normal weight) BMI = 25·0–29·9 kg/m2 (overweight) BMI ≥ 30·0 kg/m2 (obese) BMI ≤ 24·9 kg/m2 (normal weight) BMI = 25·0–29·9 kg/m2 (overweight) BMI ≥ 30·0 kg/m2 (obese) BMI ≤ 24·9 kg/m2 (normal weight) BMI = 25·0–29·9 kg/m2 (overweight) BMI ≥ 30·0 kg/m2 (obese)
Males 20–24 45 35 20 35 35 30 26 34 40 18 33 49 13 32 55
25–29 45 35 20 35 35 30 26 34 40 18 33 49 13 32 55
30–34 25 45 30 18 43 39 12 41 47 8 38 54 6 36 58
35–39 25 45 30 18 43 39 12 41 47 8 38 54 6 36 58
40–44 23 46 31 17 45 38 13 43 44 10 41 49 7 39 54
45–49 23 46 31 17 45 38 13 43 44 10 41 49 7 39 54
50–54 24 40 36 19 35 46 15 30 55 12 25 63 9 22 69
55–59 24 40 36 19 35 46 15 30 55 12 25 63 9 22 69
≥60 28 45 27 24 45 31 20 45 35 16 45 39 13 44 43
Females 20–24 40 36 24 30 39 31 22 40 38 15 41 44 10 41 49
25–29 40 36 24 30 39 31 22 40 38 15 41 44 10 41 49
30–34 24 39 37 17 38 45 12 37 51 9 35 56 6 34 60
35–39 24 39 37 17 38 45 12 37 51 9 35 56 6 34 60
40–44 17 36 47 14 33 53 10 31 59 8 28 64 6 25 69
45–49 17 36 47 14 33 53 10 31 59 8 28 64 6 25 69
50–54 16 39 45 13 40 47 12 40 48 10 40 50 7 41 52
55–59 16 39 45 13 40 47 12 40 48 10 40 50 7 41 52
≥60 18 37 45 13 35 52 9 33 58 7 31 62 5 29 66
*

Projections are based on survey data( 8 11 ).

Table 2.

Projected trends in BMI (%) for adult Mexican males and females by BMI group*

Year BMI ≤ 24·9 kg/m2 (normal weight) BMI = 25·0–29·9 kg/m2 (overweight) BMI ≥ 30·0 kg/m2 (obese)
Males 2010 32 41 27
2020 25 40 35
2030 19 38 43
2040 15 36 49
2050 12 34 54
Females 2010 26 37 37
2020 21 36 43
2030 15 36 49
2040 12 35 53
2050 9 34 57
*

Projections are based on survey data( 8 11 ).

Using the projected BMI distribution, we simulated the data of thirteen BMI-related diseases. Table 3 shows the cumulative incidence cases in the total population for males and females projected to 2050. It is clear that the disease burden is increasing every year, resulting in a doubling of prevalence rates by 2050. Obesity-related CHD and stroke and the cancers are projected to more than double between 2010 and 2050. For the other obesity-related diseases, between 2010 and 2050, the rates will nearly double for hypertension and knee osteoarthritis; the highest prevalence rate will be seen for diabetes which more than doubles.

Table 3.

Cumulative incidence cases of various obesity-related diseases from year 2010 to 2050 (per 100 000 of the population in 2010) among Mexican adults according to different scenarios

Eight cancers CHD and stroke Knee osteoarthritis Type 2 diabetes Hypertension
Year n 95 % CI n 95 % CI n 95 % CI n 95 % CI n 95 % CI
Scenario 0 2010 41 39, 43 217 213, 221 623 616, 630 296 301, 291 413 407, 419
2020 481 475, 487 2456 2443, 2469 6988 6966, 7010 3540 3524, 3556 4819 4801, 4837
2030 991 983, 999 5074 5056, 5092 13 590 13 560, 13 620 7350 7328, 7372 9786 9761, 9811
2040 1576 1566, 11 586 8305 8282, 8328 20 541 20 505, 20 577 11 681 11 654, 11 708 15 339 15 308, 15 370
2050 2264 2252, 2276 12 203 12 176, 12 230 27 925 27 884, 27 966 16 558 16 526, 16 590 21 523 21 487, 21 559
Scenario 1 2010 40 39, 42 212 208, 216 601 594, 608 274 269, 279 397 391, 403
2020 476 470, 482 2384 2371, 2397 6800 6778, 6822 3292 3277, 3307 4642 4624, 4660
2030 973 965, 981 4911 4893, 4929 13 264 13 235, 13 293 6804 6783, 6825 9428 9403, 9453
2040 1546 1536, 1556 7984 7962, 8006 20 068 20 033, 20 103 10 819 10 793, 10 845 14 783 14 753, 14 813
2050 2225 2213, 2238 11 651 11 625, 11 677 27 304 27 263, 27 345 15 348 15 318, 15 378 20 770 20 735, 20 805
Scenario 2 2010 39 37, 41 193 189, 197 569 562, 576 214 210, 218 354 349, 359
2020 456 450, 462 2173 2161, 2185 6399 6378, 6420 2690 2676, 2704 4235 4218, 4252
2030 934 926, 942 4452 4435, 4469 12 582 12 553, 12 611 5739 5720, 5758 8695 8671, 8719
2040 1501 1491, 1511 7245 7224, 7266 19 009 18 975, 19 043 9245 9421, 9269 13 712 13 683, 13 741
2050 2150 2139, 2161 10 602 10 577, 10 627 25 850 25 811, 25 889 13 135 13 107, 13 163 19 303 19 269,19 337

Scenario 0, no BMI reduction; Scenario 1, 1 % reduction in BMI across the population; Scenario 2, 5 % reduction in BMI across the population.

Table 4 shows the effect of a 1 % (Scenario 1) and a 5 % (Scenario 2) reduction in the rate of overweight and obesity (from a mean BMI of 28·5 to 28·2 kg/m2 (−1 %) and to 27·1 kg/m2 (−5 %)) that starts in 2010 on cancers, CHD and stroke, knee osteoarthritis, type 2 diabetes and hypertension. A reduction in BMI of 1 % across the population will result in 13 051 fewer cumulative cancer cases in 2030 compared with an unchanged 2010 trend and 28 277 fewer cases in 2050. The CHD and stroke cases are reduced by 118 183 cumulative cases in 2030 and by 400 227 cases in 2050. Diabetes cases are reduced by 395 878 cases in 2030 and by 877 311 cases in 2050. With a 5 % reduction in BMI, more cumulative cases are avoided. Cancer cases are decreased by 41 328 in 2030 and by 82 655 in 2050. In 2030 and 2050, respectively 450 981 and 1 160 805 cumulative cases of CHD and stroke are avoided. Diabetes is reduced by 1 168 056 cases in 2030 and by 2 481 845 cases in 2050.

Table 4.

Cumulative incidence cases of various obesity-related diseases avoided from year 2010 to 2050 (per 100 000 of the population in 2010) among Mexican adults according to different scenarios

Eight cancers CHD and stroke Knee osteoarthritis Type 2 diabetes Hypertension
Year n 95 % CI n 95 % CI n 95 % CI n 95 % CI n 95 % CI
Scenario 1 2010 1 −2, 4 5 −1, 11 22 12, 32 22 15, 29 16 8, 24
2020 5 −4, 14 72 52, 92 188 155, 221 248 225, 271 177 149, 205
2030 18 5, 31 163 135, 191 326 280, 372 546 512, 580 358 319, 397
2040 30 14, 46 321 285, 357 473 416, 530 862 820, 904 556 507, 605
2050 39 20, 58 552 508, 596 621 555, 682 1210 1159, 1261 753 695, 811
Scenario 2 2010 2 −1, 5 24 18, 30 54 44, 64 82 72, 90 59 51, 57
2020 25 16, 34 283 264, 302 589 556, 622 850 828, 872 584 557, 611
2030 57 45, 69 622 594, 650 1008 962, 1054 1611 1579, 1643 1091 1053, 1129
2040 75 59, 91 1060 1025, 1095 1532 1476, 1588 2436 2395, 2477 1627 1579, 1675
2050 114 95, 133 1601 1558, 1644 2075 2009, 2141 3423 3374, 3472 2220 2163, 2277

Scenario 1, 1 % reduction in BMI across the population; Scenario 2, 5 % reduction in BMI across the population.

The economic burden of the BMI-related diseases across each of the three scenarios is presented in Table 5. The cancer costs double when projected until 2050. The CHD and stroke costs increase from $US 324 million to $US 557 million and $US 797 million in 2030 and 2050 respectively. All diseases, calculated to cost $US 806 million in 2010, could increase to $US 1·2 billion in 2030 and to $US 1·7 billion in 2050. Table 5 also shows that a 1 % reduction in BMI prevalence could save a total of $US 43 million in 2030 and $US 85 million in 2050. A 5 % BMI decrease saves $US 117 million in 2030 and $US 192 million in 2050.

Table 5.

Projected health-care costs (in millions of $US) of various obesity-related diseases in year 2010 to 2050 among Mexican adults according to different scenarios

Scenario 0 Scenario 1 Scenario 2
Year Eight cancers CHD and stroke All thirteen diseases Eight cancers CHD and stroke All thirteen diseases Eight cancers CHD and stroke All thirteen diseases
2010 50 324 806 50 317 796 49 310 783
2011 53 346 837 52 336 823 51 326 804
2012 54 362 862 54 351 846 53 339 823
2013 56 370 880 56 362 867 55 348 838
2014 57 384 902 58 372 886 56 359 855
2015 58 395 923 59 381 903 58 368 870
2016 60 404 942 60 392 922 60 376 885
2017 62 416 964 62 402 941 61 385 901
2018 64 425 984 63 408 957 62 392 914
2019 65 435 1004 65 420 978 63 401 930
2020 67 445 1025 67 429 997 64 407 943
2021 69 456 1047 68 438 1016 65 414 959
2022 70 463 1066 70 447 1035 66 422 976
2023 72 474 1089 71 457 1055 68 432 995
2024 73 486 1112 73 470 1080 70 443 1015
2025 74 496 1133 74 481 1101 72 452 1034
2026 77 508 1158 75 492 1122 73 462 1053
2027 78 519 1181 77 502 1143 75 471 1073
2028 79 532 1205 78 512 1164 76 482 1093
2029 80 544 1228 79 523 1186 78 493 1114
2030 81 557 1254 81 537 1211 78 506 1137
2031 82 569 1277 82 547 1231 80 516 1157
2032 84 580 1300 83 557 1252 82 526 1177
2033 85 592 1324 84 567 1272 84 537 1199
2034 87 604 1348 85 580 1296 85 548 1220
2035 87 618 1372 86 590 1317 86 559 1240
2036 88 632 1397 87 604 1340 87 570 1260
2037 89 642 1419 88 616 1363 87 583 1281
2038 90 654 1441 90 628 1385 90 596 1305
2039 91 671 1469 91 641 1408 91 607 1325
2040 92 684 1492 92 650 1427 92 617 1345
2041 94 697 1517 94 660 1448 93 628 1365
2042 96 708 1540 96 669 1467 95 637 1382
2043 97 718 1559 97 681 1490 95 646 1400
2044 97 726 1576 98 689 1507 96 656 1417
2045 98 738 1598 99 701 1528 97 666 1435
2046 99 752 1623 101 711 1548 98 675 1452
2047 101 763 1644 102 720 1567 99 682 1466
2048 102 773 1663 103 731 1588 100 694 1486
2049 103 785 1683 103 739 1603 100 703 1501
2050 104 797 1706 104 748 1621 102 709 1514
Total 3263 23 042 51 548 3257 22 057 49 687 3194 20 941 46 917

Scenario 0, no BMI reduction; Scenario 1, 1 % reduction in BMI across the population; Scenario 2, 5 % reduction in BMI across the population.

Discussion

Our analysis shows that the prevalence of overweight and obesity and the associated disease and economic burden will increase substantially in Mexico. By 2050, the prevalence of normal weight individuals will decrease to 12 % from 32 % in males and to 9 % from 26 % in females, and more people will be obese than overweight. About 12 million diabetes cases and 8 million heart disease cases are projected in 2050 alone. For the thirteen diseases considered, costs of $US 806 million are estimated for 2010 and projected to increase to $US 1·2 billion and $US 1·7 billion in 2030 and 2050 respectively.

We also found that a 1 % reduction in mean BMI could save a total of $US 43 million in 2030 and $US 85 million in 2050. A 5 % decrease saves $US 117 million in 2030 and $US 192 million in 2050. This shows considerable avoidable health-care costs and future burdens of disease. By translating these costs to per capita terms, these estimates provide measures that can be used in developing cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions to reduce obesity.

Mexico's public health community and policy makers must develop and implement effective public health interventions to halt the increasing trend in obesity prevalence. All programmes and policies need to be evaluated in order to refine and adapt effective actions that might contribute to controlling the epidemic. A very carefully designed public health strategy involving all social sectors, and with important participation of the state regulating and protecting the population and creating incentives for healthier lifestyles at the family, community, school, work and country levels, is necessary. Our analysis demonstrates that a small reduction in BMI at the national level over the years could tackle the disease burden, generating important savings and benefits for the country. Thus higher priority and investment in developing comprehensive, multisectoral programmes with an evaluation component and process indicators are urgently needed.

In Mexico, as in many other countries, the majority of the health budget is going into treatment (73·5 %) rather than prevention and public health (2·7 %). In 2006, Mexican total health-care cost for diabetes, CVD and obesity was approximately 40 billion Mexican pesos, which represents 7 % of the total health-care budget. Only 4·2 % of the total health-care budget is destined for obesity and 55·2 % for CVD( 22 ). It is important to reallocate the budget appropriately and invest in obesity prevention.

As part of the proposed solution to tackle the problem, we projected possible outcomes of two interventions with an impact on mean BMI of the population. We found that a 1 % reduction in mean BMI could save a total of $US 43 million in 2030 and $US 85 million in 2050. A 5 % decrease saves $US 117 million in 2030 and $US 192 million in 2050. This shows considerable avoidable health-care costs and future burdens of disease. Although it is possible that this reduction can be reached by national prevention programmes at an expense of approximately $US 12 per capita( 23 ), it is likely that an additional fund needs to be considered in order to prevent obesity-related diseases and no actual saving can be made at the initial stage. Still, the priority should remain the health of the population and not saving money.

Since 2007, the Mexican Federal Administration has developed several actions to tackle obesity, for example: (i) ‘Unidades de Especialidades Médicas’ (UNEMES) in 2007, a primary health clinic system focused on treatment of NCD; (ii) the national agreement for healthy eating, ‘Acuerdo Nacional para la Salud Alimentaria. Estrategia contra el Sobrepeso y la Obesidad’, in 2010; (iii) the guidelines for food and beverage sales in schools, ‘Lineamientos para el Expendio o Distribución de Alimentos o Bebidas’, in 2010; and (iv) ‘Five Steps for Your Health’ (‘Cinco pasos por tu salud’) in 2010. These all aim to promote healthy eating, lifestyle and early detection of obesity's health consequences. Nevertheless, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of these projects will take longer than planned.

While the projections presented here are based on the best data available, the study has some limitations. First, some of the data parameters were unavailable for Mexico and were interpolated using information from other countries; therefore the results could be under- or overestimated. For six cancers we used the survival rates from the USA. Mexican health-care resources are substantially scarce compared with the USA; the USA has the highest health-care expenditure per capita in the world focusing on early screening, whereas Mexican health care places a greater focus on hospital care, resulting in lower survival rates than in the USA( 24 , 25 ). Therefore, in using survival from the USA we may have overestimated cancer survival for Mexico, and possibly underestimated the burden of disease. Despite this, the projected cancer incidence carries a substantial health and economic burden that may be even higher in the actual population and should be a high priority on the health-care agenda. Moreover, there is evidence of different evolutions and patterns of natural history in nutrition-related chronic diseases. Diabetes mellitus prevalence is higher in Mexicans in contrast to European and American populations( 26 ). Half of the Mexican population with the condition have not been checked, and the ones diagnosed have poor control. The same holds with hypertension, so complications from these diseases are higher than in developed countries( 27 ). This may underestimate disease prevalence and health-care costs. These aspects have not been considered for the projections.

Second, height is increasing in Mexico due to successful national prevention policies against child undernutrition (e.g. micronutrient programmes for children)( 5 , 28 ). This will have a protective effect against obesity which has not been accounted for in the simulation model. However, the expected improvement in height in the next few years probably will be small. Third, a population with higher energy intake also has a higher intake of most nutrients, including Na. A reduction in BMI as a result of healthier diets will also cause reductions in Na intake, thus additional benefits could be expected from intensive policy to promote healthier diets. Fourth, many other effects of obesity were not considered in the analysis. The savings in expenditure due to complications of obesity could be much higher. Finally, aggressive communication campaigns against obesity, a national agreement for healthy nutrition, guidelines for foods at schools and other successful initiatives have been launched recently by the Mexican Government and might contribute to partial reductions in future prevalence( 29 ). At present, however, these programmes have not been evaluated and it is difficult to argue about their effectiveness.

Conclusion

Obesity rates across Mexico are alarming. The present study serves to highlight the need for better-quality surveillance data and effective public health interventions to curb rising obesity rates. Without these, the costs of obesity will place a huge financial burden on the public health system.

Acknowledgements

Sources of funding: GlaxoSmithKline provided a non-discretionary educational grant to support this project (grant number 27875780). Conflicts of interest: The authors declare to have no conflicts of interest. Ethics: Ethical approval was not required. Author contributions: K.R. identified data inputs, conducted the analysis and drafted the manuscript. M.B. constructed the model and did all the simulations. T.M., S.B., L.M.S.R., D.L., G.M., L.W., F.K. and K.M. provided critical guidance and edits. All authors reviewed, approved and edited the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Barquera S, Campos-Nonato I, Hearnandes-Barrera L et al. (2006) Obesity and central adiposity in Mexican adults: results from the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2006. Salud Publica Mex 51, Suppl. 4, S595–S603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sánchez-Castillo CP, Velásquez-Monroy O, Lara-Esqueda A et al. (2005) Diabetes and hypertension increases in a society with abdominal obesity: results of the Mexican National Health Survey 2000. Public Health Nutr 8, 53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Secretaria de Salud (2008) Principales causes de mortalidad general, 2008. Nacional. http://www.sinais.salud.gob.mx/descargas/xls/m_005.xls (accessed January 2012).
  • 4. Stevens G, Dias RH, Thomas KJA et al. (2008) Characterizing the epidemiological transition in Mexico: national and subnational burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. PLoS Med 5, e125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2010) Obesity and The Economics of Prevention: Fit not Fat – Mexico Key Facts. http://www.oecd.org/document/32/0,3746,en_2649_33929_46038752_1_1_1_1,00.html (accessed June 2012).
  • 6. Secretaría de Salud (2010) Acuerdo Nacional para la Salud Alimentaria: estrategia contra el sobrepeso y la obesidad, pp. 12–13. Mexico DF: Sub-Secretaría de Prevención y Promoción de la Salud de la Secretaría de Salud. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T et al. (2011) Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet 378, 815–825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Olaiz G, Rojas R, Barquera S et al. (2003) Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2000. tomo 2: La salud de los adultos. Cuernavaca, Morelos: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Olaiz G, Rivera J, Shamah T et al. (2006) Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2006. Cuernavaca, Morelos: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Arroyo P, Loria A, Fernandez V et al. (2000) Prevalence of pre-obesity and obesity in urban adult Mexicans in comparison with other large surveys. Obes Res 8, 179–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Rivera J, Shamah T, Villalpando S et al. (2001) Encuesta Nacional de Nutrición 1999. Estado nutricio de niños y mujeres en México. Cuernavaca, Morelos: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lobstein T & Leach RJ (2010) Workpackage 7: Overweight and Obesity. Report on data collection for overweight and obesity prevalence and related relative risks. Data documentation for the Dynamic Modelling for Health Impact Assessment (DYNAMO-HIA) Project. http://www.dynamo-hia.eu/object_binary/o3055_BMI_WP7-datareport_20100317.pdf
  • 13. World Health Organization (2008) Health statistics and health information systems. Disease and injury country estimates. Burden of disease. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates_country/en/index.html (accessed July 2011).
  • 14. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization (2008) The GLOBOCAN Project 2008. http://globocan.iarc.fr/ (accessed July 2011).
  • 15. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (2008) Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico; Costo Medico Tecnico. http://www.imss.gob.mx/profesionales/Documents/GRD_IMSS.pdf (accessed January 2012).
  • 16. Barcelo A, Aedo C, Rajpathak S et al. (2003) The cost of diabetes in Latin America and the Caribbean. Bull World Health Organ 81, 19–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Butland B, Jebb S, Kopelman P et al. (2007) Foresight Tackling Obesities: Future Choices – Project Report. London: Government Office for Science. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kopelman P, Jebb SA & Butland B (2007) Executive summary: Foresight: ‘Tackling Obesities: Future Choices’ project. Obes Rev 8, Suppl. 1, vi–ix. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. McPherson K, Marsh T & Brown M (2007) Foresight. Tackling Obesities: Future Choices – Modelling Future Trends in Obesity & Their Impact on Health. London: Government Office for Science. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, Population Estimates and Projections Section (2010) World Population Prospects, the 2010 Revision. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/index.htm (accessed July 2011).
  • 21. Fishman GS (1995) Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications. New York: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Neufeld LM (2007) Lecciones aprendidas en la evaluación del Programa Oportunidades. Salud Publica Mex 49, número especial, E242–E244; available at http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/pdf/106/10649091.pdf
  • 23. Secretaría de Salud (2010) Acuerdo Nacional para la Salud Alimentaria: estrategia contra el sobrepeso y la obesidad. Mexico DF: Sub-Secretaría de Prevención y Promoción de la Salud de la Secretaría de Salud. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. World Health Organization (2000) The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: WHO; available at http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/whr00_en.pdf
  • 25. World Health Organization (2009) Health Expenditure: Health Expenditure per capita. http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/EN_WHS09_Table7.pdf (accessed December 2012).
  • 26. Centers for Disease Contol and Prevention (2004) National diabetes fact sheet, United States, 2003. Atlanta, GA: CDC. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ávila Burgos L, Cahuana Hurtado L & González Domínguez D (editors) (2006) Cuentas en diabetes mellitus, enfermedades cardio. Fes y obesidad: México 2006, 1st ed. Cuernavaca, Morelos: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. World Health Organization (2011) Global Health Observatory. Prevalence of raised blood pressure, ages 25+, age standardized: Both sexes, 2008. Geneva: WHO; available at http://gamapserver.who.int/mapLibrary/Files/Maps/Global_BloodPressurePrevalence_BothSexes_2008.png
  • 29. Neufeld LM, García-Guerra A, Leroy J et al. (2006) Impacto del Programa Oportunidades en nutrición y alimentación en zonas urbanas de México. In Evaluación externa del impacto del Programa Oportunidades, pp. 29–124 [B Hernández-Prado and M Hernández-Ávila, editors]. Cuernavaca, Morelos: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES