Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2023 Jun 20;329(23):2088–2089. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7467

Development of Duffy Null–Specific Absolute Neutrophil Count Reference Ranges

Lauren E Merz 1,, Miriam A Osei 1, Charlotte M Story 1, Revital Yefidoff Freedman 2, Robin Smeland-Wagman 3, Richard M Kaufman 3, Maureen Okam Achebe 2
PMCID: PMC10282887  PMID: 37338884

Abstract

This study establishes a Duffy null phenotype–specific absolute neutrophil count reference range to optimize care and improve health equity.


Duffy antigens are glycoproteins on erythrocytes that bind chemokines.1 A single nucleotide variant in the DARC/ACKR1 gene prevents Duffy expression and results in the Duffy null phenotype (Fy[a−b−]), which provides selective advantage against Plasmodium vivax.1 This phenotype is reported in 66.7% of individuals identifying as Black in the US and is associated with adequate total body neutrophils with a clinically insignificant lower peripheral neutrophil count.1 One study found that 23.8% of healthy people with the Duffy null phenotype have an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) below 2000/μL, the lower limit of normal of many reference ranges.2 With 70% of medical decisions based on laboratory values,3 reference ranges that do not reflect normal values for a significant proportion of the population may lead to iatrogenic harm. For example, increased testing and referrals4 and discontinuation of critical medications like azathioprine have been found among individuals with Duffy null status and ANCs below conventional reference ranges.5 We aimed to establish a Duffy null phenotype–specific ANC reference range at our multi-institutional academic center.

Methods

Healthy adults at a Brigham and Women’s Hospital primary care center with self-reported Black or African American race who were scheduled for a nonurgent visit were identified through electronic medical records between January 27, 2021, and January 4, 2022. Exclusion criteria are shown in the Table. Blood samples were accrued until a preset goal of 120 acceptable Duffy null data points were obtained, based on Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines for establishing reference ranges.6 Complete blood counts with differential were performed on the Sysmex XN-9000 analyzer. Phenotyping for the Duffy antigens Fya and Fyb was performed by tube testing using serologic reagents from Bio-Rad and Quotient, respectively. The CLSI guidelines and EP Evaluator version 12.0.0.11 (Data Innovations) were used to establish a 95% reference interval by a nonparametric percentile method. A 1-sample, 1-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare ANC reference median with the Duffy null cohort median with a preset significance level of .05 (Stata version 16.1; StataCorp). Local institutional review board approval was obtained as well as verbal patient consent to collect research samples.

Table. Exclusion Criteria for Patients Presenting for Nonurgent Care Visits at a Single Primary Care Site.

Exclusion criteria
Autoimmune Type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel disease, Addison disease, Graves disease, Hashimoto thyroiditis, myasthenia gravis, Sjögren syndrome, pernicious anemia, autoimmune vasculitis, celiac disease, autoimmune hepatitis, vitiligo, immune thrombocytopenia, dermatomyositis
Immunodeficiency Any primary immunodeficiency including chronic granulomatous disease, common variable immunodeficiency, Chediak-Higashi syndrome, cyclic neutropenia, leukocyte adhesion defects, or congenital neutropenia; any individual with previous assessment for or diagnosis of neutropenia of any kind was also excluded
Infectious Hepatitis C infection, hepatitis B infection, HIV infection
Malignancy Any malignant neoplasm or hematological cancer including ductal carcinoma in situ, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
Transplant Any history of receiving organ transplant or skin graft including history of allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant
Medication Carbimazole, clozapine, dapsone, dipyrone, methimazole, penicillin G, procainamide, propylthiouracil, rituximab, sulfasalazine, ticlopidine, hydroxychloroquine, infliximab, lamotrigine, oxacillin, quinine, infliximab, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; any chemotherapeutic agent or biologic

Results

Of 176 blood samples collected, 120 were Duffy null. The distribution of ANC among individuals with Duffy null status and the overlying bell curve of the current ANC reference range is shown in the Figure. Median ANC among Duffy null samples was 2820/μL (IQR, 2090/μL-3480/μL; range, 1080/μL-5950/μL). The Duffy null reference median was significantly lower than the institution’s ANC reference median (2820/μL vs 4750/μL; P < .001). The standard institutional ANC reference range is 1920/μL to 7600/μL. The Duffy null nonparametric central 95% ANC interval was 1210/μL (95% CI, 1080/μL-1390/μL) to 5390/μL (95% CI, 4640/μL-5950/μL). The data were right skewed with a smaller CI on the lower limit of normal.

Figure. Duffy Null Absolute Neutrophil Count Reference Range Compared With Current Institutional Reference Range.

Figure.

One hundred twenty Duffy null samples are represented in the histogram. The central 95% reference range for the Duffy null cohort is 1210/μL to 5390/μL. The overlying bell curve represents the current institutional central 95% reference range of 1900/μL to 7600/μL. There is a significant different between the Duffy reference median and the current reference median (2820/μL vs 4750/μL; P < .001).

Discussion

This study developed a new ANC reference range for individuals with Duffy null status that is lower than the institution’s standard ANC reference ranges. Based on these data, Brigham and Women’s Hospital as well as 5 associated clinic sites have opted to add a comment below the current ANC reference indicating that the expected ANC reference range is 1210/μL to 5390/μL for individuals with Duffy null status. Limitations of this study include using a convenience sample of individuals presenting to primary care and including only individuals who self-identified as Black or African American. Individuals who identified as another race and had the Duffy null phenotype may therefore have been excluded. Reference ranges that do not reflect the diverse populations served may cause iatrogenic harm such as overtesting, ineligibility for clinical trials, and even inappropriate dose reduction or cessation of essential medications.5 Use of this alternative reference range is expected to provide more personalized and equitable health care as well as emphasize the full range of normal values for all people. Other institutions should examine their ANC reference ranges and consider adding a Duffy null–specific reference range as a simple way to optimize care and improve health equity.

Section Editors: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Deputy Editor; Kristin Walter, MD, Senior Editor.

Supplement.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Howes RE, Patil AP, Piel FB, et al. The global distribution of the Duffy blood group. Nat Commun. 2011;2:266. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Merz LE, Story CM, Osei MA, et al. Absolute neutrophil count by Duffy status among healthy Black and African American adults. Blood Adv . 2023;7(3):317-320. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Strengthening clinical laboratories. Published 2018. Accessed November 14, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/strengthening-clinical-labs.html#print
  • 4.Oyogoa E, Martens KL, McMurry HS, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients referred for asymptomatic neutropenia at a single academic center: a focus on racial disparities. Blood. 2022;140(suppl 1):5119-5120. doi: 10.1182/blood-2022-170414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dickson AL, Daniel LL, Jackson E, et al. Race, genotype, and azathioprine discontinuation: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2022;175(8):1092-1099. doi: 10.7326/M21-4675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Horowitz GL. Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory: Approved Guideline Vol 28. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES