Skip to main content
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1985 Apr;48(4):367–373. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.48.4.367

Visual evoked potentials to lateralised stimuli in two cases of callosal agenesis.

M D Rugg, A D Milner, C R Lines
PMCID: PMC1028304  PMID: 3998742

Abstract

Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to lateralised light flashes were recorded from two acallosal patients. In one patient, these recordings were made while he performed a choice-reaction time task, and in the other patient the VEPs were obtained during a simple reaction time task. In both cases the patient's VEPs from electrode sites contralateral to the visual field of stimulus delivery resembled those of controls. Their VEPs from ipsilateral sites were aberrant, however, in that while control subjects showed a smaller and slightly delayed ipsilateral N160 component, this was not discernible in the patients' data. It is concluded that the ipsilateral N160 relies for its generation on the transcallosal transfer of information processed initially by the contralateral hemisphere.

Full text

PDF
367

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barett G., Blumhardt L., Halliday A. M., Halliday E., Kriss A. A paradox in the lateralisation of the visual evoked response. Nature. 1976 May 20;261(5557):253–255. doi: 10.1038/261253a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bashore T. R. Vocal and manual reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Psychol Bull. 1981 Mar;89(2):352–368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lines C. R. Nasotemporal overlap investigated in a case of agenesis of the corpus callosum. Neuropsychologia. 1984;22(1):85–90. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90011-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lines C. R., Rugg M. D., Milner A. D. The effect of stimulus intensity on visual evoked potential estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Exp Brain Res. 1984;57(1):89–98. doi: 10.1007/BF00231135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Milner A. D., Lines C. R. Interhemispheric pathways in simple reaction time to lateralized light flash. Neuropsychologia. 1982;20(2):171–179. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(82)90007-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Milner A. D. Simple reaction times to lateralized visual stimuli in a case of callosal agenesis. Neuropsychologia. 1982;20(4):411–419. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(82)90040-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Milner D. Neuropsychological studies of callosal agenesis. Psychol Med. 1983 Nov;13(4):721–725. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700051424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Reynolds D. M., Jeeves M. A. Further studies of crossed and uncrossed pathway responding in callosal agenesis--reply to Kinsbourne and Fisher. Neuropsychologia. 1974 Mar;12(2):287–290. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(74)90015-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rugg M. D., Lines C. R., Milner A. D. Visual evoked potentials to lateralized visual stimuli and the measurement of interhemispheric transmission time. Neuropsychologia. 1984;22(2):215–225. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90064-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES