Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Jun 21;18(6):e0287480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287480

Evaluation of biochemical, physiological traits and percentage of essential oil of sickleweed (Falcaria vulgaris) population in different geographical and climatic regions

Mehdi Rahimi 1,*, Mojtaba Kordrostami 2,*, Jaber Nasiri 2
Editor: Alia Ahmed3
PMCID: PMC10284402  PMID: 37343048

Abstract

Sickleweed (Falcaria vulgaris) is the name of a species of annual, and perennial herbaceous plants of the genus Falcaria. Climate change could negatively influnces the performance of various plant species in plant kingdom. In this study, 15 different sickleweed populations from seven provinces of the country were collected based on an unbalanced nest design with 10 replications and the percentage of essential oil, types of chlorophyll, phenol, proline, protein, and carotenoids were measured on them. The results showed that there was a significant difference between populations at the level of one percent for the studied traits. The results of the mean comparison showed that populations Ard-Shaban and Qaz-Ilan in terms of the evaluated traits and especially the percentage of essential oil were at the upper of the studied samples and selected as suitable populations. In addition, populations Gilan-Deylaman and Kur-Gerger-e Sofla were also identified as superior populations in terms of studied traits by cluster analysis and principle component analysis (PCA). Since the high level of proline and biochemical and physiological traits in plants can play a role in plants’ tolerance to stresses, therefore, populations with high values of these traits can be used in stress tolerance breeding programs. Therefore, in this study, populations Gilan-Deylaman and Kur-Gerger-e Sofla can be suitable populations for this purpose. In addition, the essential oil of this plant is used in the treatment of diseases, and therefore populations Ard-Shaban and Qaz-Ilan, which showed a high percentage of essential oil, can be used in breeding programs to increase the performance of this trait.

Introduction

Today, the nutritional, health, and economic value of medicinal plants, along with the role of 25% in the production of drugs in the world, has led to considerable attention to them [1]. The country of Iran has a variety of plant species due to its climatic diversity. The genetic resources available in each country are one of the most valuable potential agricultural resources of that country. The main goal of studying the diversity between and within different plant populations and the relationship between germplasm collections is to finally use this information for the production and development of cultivars with better productivity than cultivated species [24]. In general, genetics affects plant yield and secondary metabolites of medicinal plants, and the interaction of area×mass is very significant on the yield of total dry matter and plant and varies depending on the region and type of mass [57]. Transferring masses and different species from one region to another as well as the forcing of the adaptation plant to the new environment can change the ratio of secondary metabolites and in some cases induce new medicinal metabolites [8].

Climate, directly and indirectly, affects all factors affecting the environment and plant growth [9,10]. Experiments conducted in recent years show the effective role of climatic factors on the distribution of plants [11]. According to some studies, although the weather factor plays the most important role in the growth and distribution of plants, plants are developed through several different factors including climate, soil characteristics, and natural conditions [12]. Sickleweed (Falcaria vulgaris) belongs to the Falcaria genus and the Apiaceae family and belongs to the Eudicots Clade. Although Sickleweed has been described as annual, biennial or perennial [13], but according to the authors’ observations and evaluations, it was annual. Sickleweed is especially important because of its nutritional value and medicinal effects on the human body. This plant is usually consumed as a vegetable and is a common food in spring. It is recommended in traditional medicine books to treat skin wounds, stomach problems, liver diseases, and blood purification, and its therapeutic effects have been proven in modern medical science [13]. The increasing recognition of the properties of this plant species and the increasing population growth along with the decrease in rainfall have put increasing pressure on this plant population that preventive actions should be done for the protection and breeding of this plant.

There are different methods to investigate the diversity between different plant samples; one of the cheapest and most common methods is the morphological diversity investigation. Although morphological diversity is influenced by environmental conditions compared to molecular diversity, it is widely used in different plants. Identification of morphological diversity is not only useful in the management of plant germplasms but also provides a good idea to researchers for plant breeding [14]. Moreover, one of the important goals of medicinal plants is to select populations with high levels of secondary metabolites and increase the number of important compounds in these plants, which is possible by identifying effective physiological and biochemical parameters and knowing the relationships between plants and environmental factors [15]. Geographical and climatic factors are effective in the production of secondary metabolites and morphological characteristics of medicinal plants. Although effective substances are made by guiding genetic processes, their production is significantly influenced by environmental factors such as light, temperature, and altitude. Environmental factors affect the total amount of effective substances, their constituent elements, dry weight production, and plant morphology [16].

Various studies have been conducted in the field of investigating biochemical and physiological traits under the influence of various factors such as different regions, different environmental conditions, etc., in different medicinal plants [1720]. In the case of the medicinal species Satureja, Spear Thistle, Persian hogweed, and chicory, it was shown that there is a direct relationship between the increase in height and the amount of phenolic and flavonoid active substances [21]. In the study of the genetic diversity of the this population with SCoT molecular marker and morphological traits, the population was divided into three and two groups based on the markers and traits, respectivlley [22].

Research have revealed that there might be significant regional variation in the biochemical characteristics of different plants. For instance, it has been discovered that arid regions with little rainfall and high temperatures have higher levels of medicinal plants in terms of their total phenolic and flavonoid content, antioxidant activity, and essential oil content. The influence of environmental elements like temperature, rainfall, and soil type can be used to explain the diversity in the biochemical characteristics of medicinal plants across various geographical areas [2327].

So far, not much study has been done in the world and Iran regarding the evaluation of morphological traits of different populations of sickleweed plants and the determination of their morphological identification. The biochemical and physiological traits of sickleweed vary across different populations, depending on the environmental factors such as temperature, rainfall, soil type, and altitude. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effect of geographical origin on populations and to investigate the diversity between populations, as well as to identify the best populations with breeding potential with the highest yield in terms of important traits such as essential oil, and physiological and biochemical traits. In addition, the use of this information is for creating a future protection program to prevent them from becoming extinct.

Materials and methods

Climatic factors

The climatic characteristics of the regions are shown in Table 1. The information related to the height of the location as well as the geographic longitude and latitude was recorded by Google Earth software, and the information related to the weather as well as various bioclimatic parameters [28] was estimated from the WorldClim website.

Table 1. Characteristics of the collection areas of Sickleweed plant samples.

Row Province City Region Longitude (degree) Latitude (degree) Height above sea level (meter)
G1 Kermanshah Sonqor Kivananat 47.27889 34.84972 1847
G2 Kermanshah Sonqor Bavaleh 47.69778 35.02722 2010
G3 Kermanshah Sahneh Sahneh 47.75833 34.44194 1465
G4 Hamedan Asad abad Chaharduli 48.065 34.93139 1890
G5 Kurdistan Gorveh Panjeh Ali 47.70834 35.18667 1912
G6 Kurdistan Dehgolan Bolbanabad 47.41195 35.15222 1851
G7 Kurdistan Dehgolan Amirabad 47.31084 35.10361 1974
G8 Kurdistan Kamyaran Gerger-e Sofla 47.27667 35.00334 1824
G9 Kurdistan Kamyaran Qaleh Gah 47.21196 34.95001 1611
G10 Kurdistan Bijar Nemat abad Auliya 47.41333 35.68444 1922
G11 Kurdistan Bijar Seylatan 47.83054 36.03666 1617
G12 Qazvin Qazvin Ilan 50.64778 36.42528 1450
G13 Ardabil Meshkinshahr Shaban 47.44833 38.37556 1236
G14 Qom Qom Khalajastan 50.19028 34.67944 1952
G15 Gilan Siahkal Deylaman 49.90528 36.88889 1455

Plant collection

The 15 different plant samples (Table 1) were collected from seven provinces of Iran. These seven provinces include Ardabil, Kurdistan, Kermanshah, Gilan, Hamedan, Qazvin, and Qom so the number of selected regions was different for each province. For each population in each region, 10 different samples were selected and considered as replicates. In addition, the evaluation of traits and measurements was performed on these samples, and studies were conducted based on a nesting design with an unbalanced number of regions. In each area, the distance of the samples from each other was at least 10 meters to avoid interference from the samples.

Sample preparation

The leaves of the plants were collected in the vegetative stage of the Sickleweed plant in the early and mid-spring of 2021, and the fresh leaves were placed in foil after harvesting, placed in liquid nitrogen, and transferred to the laboratory for use in the next experiments such as percentage of essential oil, measuring physiological and biochemical traits based on methods described by Sudhakar et. al, [29].

Chlorophyll content

Total chlorophyll, as well as chlorophylls a and b, were measured by Arnon’s method [30] using 0.2 g of fresh plant leaf material in a test tube and grind with 10 mL of 80% acetone, and the absorbances read at 663 and 645 nm in a spectrophotometer. Calculate the amount of chlorophyll present in the extract in mg chlorophyll per g tissue using the following equations as described by Sudhakar et. al, [29]:

mgchlorophylla/gtissue=[(12.7×A663)(2.69×A645)]×v1000×w (1)
mgchlorophyllb/gtissue=[(22.9×A645)(4.68×A663)]×v1000×w (2)
mgtotalchlorophyll/gtissue=[(20.2×A645)(8.02×A663)]×v1000×w (3)

Where:

A = absorbance at specific wavelengths

V = final volume of chlorophyll extract

W = fresh weight of tissue extracted

Total carotenoids

The total carotenoids were measured by Price and Hendry’s method [31] using the sample extract, obtained for the estimation of chlorophylls by the Acetone Method. The absorbances are read at 663 nm, 645 nm, and also at 480 nm in a spectrophotometer and the concentration of pigments is mg/g fresh weight. Carotenoid content is calculated using the following equations as described by Sudhakar et. al, [29]:

mgtotalcarotenoids/gtissue=[A480+(0.114×A663)(0.638A645)]×v1000×w (4)

This equation compensates for the interference at this wavelength, due to chlorophyll.

Proline

The Bates et al. method [32] was used to measure the proline content of leaves. Initially, 2 ml of the supernatant after centrifuging the extract was combined with 2 ml of the reagent ninhydrin and 2 ml of pure acetic acid, then the mixture was placed in an air bath at 100°C for 1 h. The tubes containing the mixture were then as soon as possible put in the ice bath. The mixture was then given 4 ml of toluene, and the tubes were thoroughly vortexed. The tubes were stacked for 15 to 20 min to create two distinct layers. Proline concentration was determined using the toluene and proline-containing upper color phase. The absorbance was determined at 518 nm and the amount of proline was calculated using a standard curve.

Protein

The proteins were extracted from the aerial parts at a temperature between 0°C and 4°C in ice water with phosphate buffer. Then, the Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) G-250 was used to give a consistent blue color. After 25 min, the absorbance was read by a spectrophotometer at 595 nm. Protein concentrations were calculated using a standard curve to measure the amount of total protein by Bradford’s method [33].

Reducing sugars

In a Chinese mortar, 0.02 g of the plant’s aerial section was ground with 10 ml of distilled water and heated on an electric stove. Once the solution had boiled, the heat was turned off, and filter paper was used to collect the solution. Test tubes were filled with 2 ml of the produced extract, and two milliliters of copper sulfate solution, and then the test tubes’ ends were sealed with cotton before being submerged in a hot bath at a temperature of 100°C for 20 min. the 2 ml of the phosphomolybdic acid solution were added to the tubes once they had cooled, and after a short while, a blue tint emerged. The test tubes were then agitated ferociously with a vortex device to evenly spread the color throughout the test tube. Using a spectrophotometer and the standard curve, the absorbance intensity of the solutions at 600 nm wavelength was measured by the Somogyi method [34] to show the amount of reducing sugars.

Total phenolic

The extraction of phenolic compounds was done according to Malik and Singh [35] and the stages of preparation, extraction, etc. are shown in Sudhakar et. al, [29]. The total amount of phenolic compounds were measured by the Folin-Ciocalteu method at 650 nm spectrophotometrically and expressed as mg phenols/100 g material.

Essential oil

The percentage of essential oil was also determined by distillation with water using Clevenger- type apparatus by the European Pharmacopoeia [36], and after drying the water with the essential oil using dry sodium sulfate, the amount of essential oil was purified and then the percentage of essential oils was calculated relative to the dry weight.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyzes including descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and multivariate analysis were performed on the data. Descriptive statistics including mean, range, and standard deviation, etc. were performed on the average data of 15 populations, and the phenotypic coefficient variation (PCV) was calculated as follows for the studied traits.

CVp=(σp2/x¯)×100 (5)

Before analysis, the variance of the data has checked for the correctness of the assumptions of the variance analysis, such as normal distribution of experimental errors, independence of experimental errors, uniformity of variances within the treatment, and the absence of interaction between treatment and provinces. After establishing these assumptions, the variance analysis of the data was carried out based on the unbalanced nested design, and Tukey’s test was used to compare the mean. In addition, the variance components were calculated based on the expected value of the mean square of the unbalanced nested design. The measured data for the essential oil percentage, protein, sugar content, and proline traits were very small, so the first data were multiplied by 100 and then the obtained data were used and the variance analysis was performed using SAS software version 9.4 [37].

Multivariate analyses were used to investigate the genetic structure and grouping of populations and to identify kinship relationships between them. Grouping of sickleweed populations by using traits as well as grouping of the climatic regions by using bioclimatic parameters were done based on cluster analysis. The cluster analysis was done based on different methods and different distance criteria. Then, the distance method and the criterion that had the highest cophenetic correlation coefficient were selected and the grouping was done based on it. Finally, the distribution of the populations was also done by principal component analysis and the biplot method. The cluster analysis method and principal component analysis were done with PAST software [38]. Determining the number of groups was done with the Factoextra [39] package and R software.

Results and discussion

Nineteen bioclimatic indicators were measured and calculated for the collection locations in this study to investigate the geographic variety. The diversity and similarity of these areas were then assessed using various cluster analysis techniques and distance criteria. Fig 1 displays the outcomes of the cluster analysis for these areas. The findings demonstrated that these locations are divided into two groups using the Elbow technique and that they share similar weather patterns and bioclimatic data. The Elbow method uses a graphical representation to find the optimal number of clusters by Within-Cluster Sum of Square. The inertia is the sum of the squared distances from each point to the cluster center [40]. In the first group were Seylatan and Qaleh Gah regions from Kurdistan province, Sahneh from Kermanshah, Deylaman from Gilan, Ilan from Qazvin, and Shaban from Ardabil, and in the second group were Kiyunanat and Bavaleh regions from Kermanshah, Panjeh Ali, Bolbanabad, Amirabad, Gerger-e Sofla and Nemat abad auliya from Kurdistan, Khalajastan from Qom and Chaharduli from Hamedan. The range of a species geographic distribution is a complex issue in population ecology that cannot be fully understood. Generally speaking, whether a species can survive in its native environment depends on how well an individual can meet biological needs such as dietary, physiological, and behavioral needs [41]. Weather patterns and terrain, or more specifically, geographic diversity, have an impact on the quantity and richness of resources. The classic hypothesis of allopatric speciation postulates that physical obstacles like distances, lowlands, and heights, among others, can separate populations and lead to various trends in the variety of those populations [42,43]. The alterations that distinct populations have endured along distinct evolutionary pathways may have resulted in a sort of superiority in reproduction and adaption to various places [44]. Plants grown in arid regions with low rainfall and high temperatures may have higher percentages of essential oil due to the need to conserve water and prevent water loss through transpiration [23,27,45,46].

Fig 1. The region cluster analysis of sickleweed population by bioclimatic parameters.

Fig 1

The name of population is given in Table 1.

Because the purpose of studying genetic populations is to compare genotypes in terms of the amount of existing variation, This way, a range of data can be used for the initial comparison between the studied genotypes and get a general view of the amount of existing variation. Descriptive statistics including the minimum, maximum, and range of the studied traits are shown in Table 2. The coefficient of variation parameter is one of the most important and valuable indices for estimating diversity in populations, and since this criterion is not affected by the trait measurement unit or its range, it is more important than other diversity criteria such as the range. Therefore, it is possible to make reliable selections to improve traits that have a higher coefficient of variation. Examining the phenotypic coefficient of variation of the traits showed that phenol, Chl. b and essential oil had the highest PCV. Therefore, these traits can be used in the breeding programs and effective selections can be made among the studied sickleweed populations to improve and breed these traits.

Table 2. Descriptive statistics of biochemical and physiological traits in sickleweed populations.

Traits Statistical parameters
Min Max Range Avereage Stand. dev PCV
Essential oil (%) 0.076 0.089 0.013 0.081 0.004 5.362
Protein (mg/GFW) 0.00679 0.00685 0.00006 0.00682 0.00002 0.23020
Proline (mg/GFW) 0.00245 0.00288 0.00043 0.00273 0.00011 4.19188
Sugars (mg/GFW) 0.04699 0.05737 0.01038 0.05530 0.00267 4.82979
Chl. a (mg/GFW) 7.381 8.397 1.017 8.014 0.364 4.545
Chl. b (mg/GFW) 2.018 2.516 0.498 2.198 0.119 5.426
Total Chl. (mg/GFW) 9.597 10.893 1.296 10.235 0.397 3.884
Carotenoids (mg/GFW) 4.152 4.608 0.456 4.434 0.163 3.685
Phenol (mg/100 GFW) 52.031 88.149 36.118 55.315 9.100 16.451

In addition, the lowest PCV is related to protein traits, and the improvement of this trait will be less successful than other traits through selection in the studied population. According to the values of the PCV of the traits, it is observed that there is a favorable variation among the traits for most of them, and they can be used to improve the studied populations of sickleweed (Table 2). The lowest PCV related to protein traits (0.23), and the highest related to phenol (16.45) and other traits were in this range. The reason for the high diversity of traits can be the environmental conditions and the different genetic backgrounds of the populations. The variation in leaf length trait and petiole length trait was more than other traits and therefore these traits can be considered by breeders because these traits play a role in stress tolerance.

The results of variance analysis of the unbalanced nest design for physiological and biochemical traits as well as the percentage of essential oil are shown in Table 3. The effects of the province and the population within the province for the studied traits showed a significant difference at the level of 0.01 between sickleweed populations (Table 3). The significance of the effects of the province and the population within the province showed that there is a significant difference between the provinces and between 15 different populations, and it shows the diversity among these populations and provinces.

Table 3. Unbalanced nest variance analysis of physiological and biochemical traits in sickleweed populations.

S.O.V. Df. The mean square of traits
Essential oil (%) Phenol (mg/100gfw) Carotenoids (mg/gfw) Total Chl. (mg/gfw) Chl. b (mg/gfw) Chl. a (mg/gfw) Sugars (mg/gfw) Proline (mg/gfw) Protein (mg/gfw)
Province 6 64.820** 3962.076** 4.306** 15.436** 1.387** 21.086** 2.722** 5.66E-03** 0.033
Populations (Province) 8 11.623** 690.901** 3.038** 10.766** 0.428** 4.295** 0.548** 4.79E-03** 0.006
Error 135 0.367 0.873 0.002 0.009 0.002 0.003 0.003 4.28E-05 2.3E-07
CV of design (%) 8.83 1.47 0.99 0.92 1.73 0.68 1 0.98 0.18

**: Significant at 1% probability level.

Table 4 shows the results of variance components for the studied traits and the results showed that the percentage of variance components for the studied traits was between 25.31 and 83.92% among the studied populations and between 8.51 and 73.36% among the provinces. Based on these results, considerable diversity is observed between populations and between provinces and these differences can be used to select the best population. In addition, for some traits, variation within the population was also observed, which sees from the results of the percentage of variance components for the source of error. Variation within the population for these traits was less than 8%. Therefore, the chance of selecting superior individuals within populations will be low due to low diversity.

Table 4. Estimation of the variance components of the sources of variation in the unbalanced nest design of the studied physiological and biochemical traits.

Traits Sources of variation
Province Populations (Province) Error
Variance Components % Variance Components % Variance Components %
Chl. a (mg/gfw) 0.933 68.354 0.429 31.451 0.003 0.196
Chl. b (mg/gfw) 0.053 54.538 0.043 43.639 0.002 1.823
Total Chl. (mg/gfw) 0.259 19.307 1.076 80.054 0.009 0.639
Carotenoids (mg/gfw) 0.070 18.742 0.304 80.816 0.002 0.442
Proline (mg/gfw) 0.0015 73.356 0.0006 26.633 0.00000023 0.011
Protein (mg/gfw) 0.000048 8.506 0.000475 83.928 0.0000428 7.567
Sugars (mg/gfw) 0.121 67.838 0.054 30.601 0.003 1.561
Phenol (mg/100gfw) 181.732 72.228 69.003 27.425 0.873 0.347
Essential oil (%) 2.955 66.45 1.126 25.31 0.367 8.24

Based on the mean comparison results, different sickleweed populations were placed in different groups, which indicates the diversity and increased chance of selection for breeders. The results of the mean comparison for the studied traits showed that there is a big difference between different populations of sickleweed and this situation increases the chance of choosing favorable sickleweed populations for the breeder. The Ard-Shaban population had the highest values for essential oil, phenol, total chlorophyll, and Chl. a, and Chl. traits, and follow in the Qaz-Ilan population (Table 5). Therefore, these populations can be recommended for planting in different areas due to the high performance of photosynthesis, which plays a role in increasing production.

Table 5. The mean comparison of physiological and biochemical studied traits for sickleweed populations using Duncan’s method.

Populations Traits
Essential oil (%) Phenol Sugars (mg/gfw) Protein (mg/gfw) Proline (mg/gfw) Carotenoids (mg/gfw) Total Chl. (mg/gfw) Chl. b (mg/gfw) Chl. a (mg/gfw)
Kivananat 8.90ab 53.545h 5.656c 0.684bc 0.261i 4.152f 9.597h 2.216h 7.381g
Bavaleh 7.69cd 53.411h 5.712bc 0.683bc 0.271f 4.597d 10.892d 2.325fg 8.377d
Sahneh 8.55a-c 49.793i 5.398d 0.6706d 0.287e 4.778b 8.173k 2.074i 7.228h
Chaharduli 7.32de 44.995j 5.006f 0.697a 0.245k 3.417j 9.602h 2.401e 6.099m
Panjeh Ali 5.43f 66.269f 5.016f 0.638f 0.227mn 4.848a 10.516e 2.261gh 8.255e
Bolbanabad 4.36gh 69.503e 4.836g 0.621g 0.249j 3.014l 9.778g 2.027i 7.752f
Amirabad 6.52e 86.645b 5.013f 0.659e 0.266h 3.963g 9.094j 2.218h 6.876j
Gerger-e Sofla 7.11de 81.538c 5.272e 0.676cd 0.228m 3.650i 11.714b 2.329f 7.116i
Qaleh Gah 5.26fg 88.149a 5.424d 0.693ab 0.269g 4.167f 9.182j 2.492d 6.224l
nemat abad auliya 4.18h 65.539f 4.699h 0.656e 0.294d 3.845h 10.009f 2.717c 7.293h
Seylatan 4.03h 73.589d 5.201e 0.679cd 0.227n 3.231k 9.588h 2.516d 6.791k
Ilan 9.25a 61.788g 4.817g 0.659e 0.237l 4.697c 9.350i 2.797b 6.858kj
Shaban 9.35a 43.489k 5.949a 0.676cd 0.366a 4.907a 9.441i 2.958a 9.384b
Khalajastan 6.59e 50.555i 5.768b 0.635f 0.310c 4.317e 11.282c 2.415e 8.867c
Deylaman 8.28bc 66.685f 5.033f 0.642f 0.342b 4.141f 12.482a 2.919a 9.562a

The treatments that have the same letters do not differ statistically at the 1% level.

The results of correltion analysis are presented in Fig 2. Based on the results, there was a significant positive correlation between essential oils and sugars, proline, carotenoids and chlorophylls. There was also a negative correlation between essential oils and phenols. There was a positive correlation between sugars and protein, proline and carotenoids and Chl. a.

Fig 2. The correlation diagram of studied traits in sickleweed populations.

Fig 2

Principal component analysis was used before cluster analysis to clarify the relative importance of the variables that contribute to the cluster. The results of PCA for the studied traits are shown in Table 6. The eigenvalues obtained from components 1 to 3 justified 97.6, 1.2, and 0.85% of the total variance, respectively. The coefficients of the eigenvectors obtained from the first component showed that the phenol trait was the most important trait for clustering in this component. In the second component, Essential oil and Carotenoids traits, and in the third component, Total Chl. and Chl. a traits were the most important traits. The distribution of the studied populations based on the first two components is shown in Fig 3. The studied populations were divided into three groups. Populations Kur-Gerger-e, Sofla, Kur-Amirabad, and Kur-Qaleh Gah were in the first group, populations Kur-Panjeh Ali, Kur-Seylatan, Kur-Nemat abad auliya, Kur-Bolbanabad, Ham-Chaharduli, and Qom-Khalajastan were in the second group, and the rest of the populations were in the third group. Since the role of phenol in the first component and the role of essential oil and carotenoids in the second component was positive and effective. Therefore, the populations placed in the first area of the biplot are suitable populations for increasing the percentage of essential oil as well as carotenoids and phenol. In addition, biochemical and physiological traits play a role in stress tolerance, therefore the first area of the biplot of PC1 and PC3 is suitable. The Gilan-Deylaman and Kur-Gerger-e Sofla populations were placed in this area and identified as the superior populations of this study and can be used in breeding programs for tolerance.

Table 6. The results of four principal component analyses for traits.

Traits PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4
Essential oil -0.06961 0.93826 -0.25872 -0.15457
Phenol 0.99697 0.07436 -0.00513 0.019862
Sugars -0.01111 0.072748 0.022018 0.15669
Protein -0.00014 0.001947 -0.00908 -0.01002
Proline -0.00115 0.007903 0.010366 0.026353
Carotenoids -0.01557 0.19925 -0.01841 0.46504
Total Chl. 0.005571 0.16237 0.75521 -0.56126
Chl. b -0.0026 0.053882 0.056897 0.025628
Chl. a -0.02838 0.19951 0.5987 0.64686
Eigenvalue 210.545 2.59209 1.82469 0.474473
% variance 97.593 1.2015 0.84579 0.21993

Fig 3. The biplot grouping of studied population based on four principal component analysis.

Fig 3

To determine the degree of diversity among the studied sickleweed populations was used the cluster analysis method. Different cluster analysis methods with different distance criteria were used to determine the degree of diversity between the studied populations, and the results showed that the UPGMA method with Euclidean distance had the highest value of the Cophentic correlation coefficient (0.79), and therefore, the cluster analysis was performed with this method.

The results of cluster analysis showed that there was the lowest genetic distance (2.08) between the populations of Ker-Bavaleh and Ker-Kivananat and the highest genetic distance (44.97) was between the populations of Ard-Shaban and Kur-Qaleh Gah. As seen in Fig 4, the different populations of sickleweed are divided into three main groups. The first group included the population of Kur-Gerger-e, Sofla, Kur-Qaleh, Gah, and Kur-Amirabad, the second group included the population of Kur-Panjeh Ali, Kur Seylatan, Kur-Nemat abad auliya, Kur-Bolbanabad, Gilan-Deylaman, and Qaz-Ilan, and In the third group were the populations of Ker-Kivananat, Ker-Bavaleh, Ker-Sahneh, Ard-Shaban, Ham-Chaharduli, and Qom-Khalajastan. The results showed that the populations were placed in separate categories due to different genetic bases or other environmental factors, and it can be justified that the morphological traits were able to determine this distinction. The results of cluster analysis show the differences between the populations of each group and the similarities and kinships of the populations within each group. The reason for the difference between the populations of the groups can be due to the difference in the genetic structure or the effect of other environmental factors on the traits.

Fig 4. The cluster analysis dendrogram of studied population based on UPGMA method.

Fig 4

Population grouping by PCA was highly consistent with the grouping of cluster analysis. The results of this experiment showed that the number of studied traits is different in different regions. This diversity and difference in the amount of biochemical and physiological traits of sickleweed plants in different regions of Iran and other parts of the world can be caused by different weather factors (light, temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, etc.), geographical factors (geographical height, longitude, and latitude), soil conditions (soil texture, materials and nutrients) and genetic factors. Climatic conditions such as light, altitude, and average temperature have a great effect on the production of chemical compounds in horticultural and medicinal products [47]. The amount and type of active substances in medicinal plants are determined by the guidance of both environmental and genetic factors [48].

The investigation of phytochemical and physiological traits in this research showed that there was a significant difference between the studied traits of phenol content, percentage of the essence, biochemical, and physiological traits in different regions of Iran, in such a way that populations Gilan-Deylaman and Kur-Gerger-e Sofla have the highest values for these evaluated traits. Separate studies have shown in different medicinal plants [17,18,20] that biochemical and physiological trait are influenced by different collection areas, which is consistent with the results of this study. In the study of Crataegus oxyacantha plants, it was shown that the place of growth, height, and type of organ has a significant effect on the amount of phenol and flavonoids and it was found that at higher altitudes, more phenol and flavonoid compounds are produced in the plant [4951]. Of course, the difference in the quantitative amounts of phytochemical compounds, including phenolic and flavonoid compounds, among the populations of different regions can be caused by genetic diversity or ecological conditions governing the habitats [51,52]. The choosing and developing plants with high medicinal potential, high yield, or resilience to environmental stress requires an understanding of the variance in biochemical and physiological properties of plants across different geographic and climatic locations. Understanding the ecological and evolutionary processes that influence plant diversity and environment adaption is also crucial [24,25].

Conclusion

Since the high level of proline and biochemical and physiological traits in plants can play a role in plants’ tolerance to stresses, therefore, populations with high values of these traits can be used in stress tolerance breeding programs. In addition, the essential oil of this plant is used in the treatment of diseases, and therefore populations Ard-Shaban and Qaz-Ilan, which showed a high percentage of essential oil and Gilan-Deylaman and Kur-Gerger-e Sofla were identified as superior populations that they can be used in breeding programs. In conclusion, due to the influence of climatic conditions including temperature, rainfall, soil type, and altitude, the biochemical and physiological characteristics of medicinal plants might differ dramatically across different areas. The therapeutic potential of medicinal plants is significantly impacted by the diversity in their biochemical and physiological characteristics. As a result, it’s critical to comprehend how diverse geographical areas affect medicinal plants and to build plans for their production and application in the pharmaceutical sector.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) under grant number [99026928]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Mohammadi A, Nazari H, Imani S, Amrollahi H. Antifungal activities and chemical composition of some medicinal plants. Journal de Mycologie Medicale. 2014;24(2):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2014.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alwala S, Suman A, Arro JA, Veremis JC, Kimbeng CA. Target region amplification polymorphism (TRAP) for assessing genetic diversity in sugarcane germplasm collections. Crop Science. 2006;46(1):448–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.El-Mageed TAA, Mekdad AA, Rady MO, Abdelbaky AS, Saudy HS, Shaaban A. Physio-biochemical and agronomic changes of two sugar beet cultivars grown in saline soil as influenced by potassium fertilizer. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2022;22(3):3636–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saudy H, Noureldin N, Mubarak M, Fares W, Elsayed M. Cultivar selection as a tool for managing soil phosphorus and faba bean yield‎ sustainability. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2020;66(3):414–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li Y, Kong D, Fu Y, Sussman MR, Wu H. The effect of developmental and environmental factors on secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2020;148:80–9. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Saudy HS, Abd El–Momen WR, El–Khouly NS. Diversified nitrogen rates influence nitrogen agronomic efficiency and seed yield response index of sesame (Sesamum indicum, L.) cultivars. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2018;49(19):2387–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Saudy HS, Hamed MF, El–Metwally IM, Ramadan KA, Aisa KH. Assessing the effect of biochar or compost application as a spot placement on broomrape control in two cultivars of faba bean. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2021;21:1856–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bourgaud F, Gravot A, Milesi S, Gontier E. Production of plant secondary metabolites: a historical perspective. Plant science. 2001;161(5):839–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.El-Bially ME, Saudy HS, El-Metwally IM, Shahin MG. Sunflower response to application of L-ascorbate under thermal stress associated with different sowing dates. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2022;74(1):87–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shahin M, El-Bially M, Saudy H, El-Metwally I. Sowing date and irrigation effects on productivity and water use efficiency in sunflower. Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2018;26(Special issue (2D)):1483–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pardee GL, Inouye DW, Irwin RE. Direct and indirect effects of episodic frost on plant growth and reproduction in subalpine wildflowers. Global Change Biology. 2018;24(2):848–57. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Curry JP. Grassland invertebrates: ecology, influence on soil fertility and effects on plant growth. USA: Springer Science & Business Media; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Korman BL. Biology and ecology of sickleweed (Falcaria vulgaris) in the fort pierre national grassland of south Dakota [Thesis]. USA: South Dakota State University; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bhandari H, Bhanu A, Srivastava K, Singh M, Shreya A, Hemantaranjan. Assessment of genetic diversity in crop plants—an overview. Advances in Plants & Agriculture Research. 2017;7(3):279–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rattan RS. Mechanism of action of insecticidal secondary metabolites of plant origin. Crop Protection. 2010;29(9):913–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cseke LJ, Kirakosyan A, Kaufman PB, Warber S, Duke JA, Brielmann HL. Natural products from plants. Florida, USA: CRC press; 2016. 569p p. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Abdelmajeed NA, Danial EN, Ayad HS. The effect of environmental stress on qualitative and quantitative essential oil of aromatic and medicinal plants. Archives des Sciences. 2013;66(4):100–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lianopoulou V, Bosabalidis AM, Patakas A, Lazari D, Panteris E. Effects of chilling stress on leaf morphology, anatomy, ultrastructure, gas exchange, and essential oils in the seasonally dimorphic plant Teucrium polium (Lamiaceae). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2014;36(8):2271–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sharafzadeh S, Khosh-Khui M, Javidnia K. Effect of nutrients on essential oil components, pigments and total phenolic content of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.). Advances in Environmental Biology. 2011;5(4):639–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vojodi Mehrabani L, Kamran RV, Hassanpouraghdam MB, Pessarakli M. Zinc sulfate foliar application effects on some physiological characteristics and phenolic and essential oil contents of Lavandula stoechas L. under sodium chloride (NaCl) salinity conditions. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2017;48(16):1860–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.ZarghamiMoghaddam P, Mazandarani M, Zolfaghari M, Badeleh M, Ghaemi E. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of root extract of Onosma dichroanthum Boiss. in north of Iran. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2012;6(8):1776–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rahimi M, Ranjbaran E. Investigating the geographical, phenotypic and genetic diversity of Sickleweed populations by bioclimatic parameters, morphological traits and SCoT molecular markers. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2023: doi: 10.1007/s12298-023-01296-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Arraouadi S, Badri M, Jaleel CA, Djébali N, Ilahi H, Huguet T, et al. Analysis of genetic variation in natural populations of Medicago truncatula of southern Tunisian ecological areas, using morphological traits and SSR markers. Tropical Plant Biology. 2009;2:122–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Basit A, Saeed S, Ahmed A, Baloch N, Ali AZ. Genetic structuring of Ephedra an important medicinal plant from low to high altitudinal zones of Balochistan, Pakistan. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity. 2021;22(2):713–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gul J, Saeed S, Ahmed A, Basit A, Rehman A. Genetic diversity and morphological variation of Pinus gerardiana along the environmental gradient from Zhob, Balochistan, Pakistan. Nusantara Bioscience. 2021;13(1):121–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rehman A, Saeed S, Ahmed A. Genetic diversity and population structure of Seriphidium Sub-genus of Artemisia from different terrains of Balochistan, Pakistan. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity. 2021;22(5):2658–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yücedağ C, Müller M, Gailing O. Morphological and genetic variation in natural populations of Quercus vulcanica and Q. frainetto. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 2021;307:1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. WorldClim 2: new 1km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology. 2017;37(12):4302–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sudhakar P, Latha P, Reddy P. Phenotyping crop plants for physiological and biochemical traits. USA: Academic Press; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology. 1949;24(1):1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Price A, Hendry G. Iron‐catalysed oxygen radical formation and its possible contribution to drought damage in nine native grasses and three cereals. Plant, Cell & Environment. 1991;14(5):477–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bates L, Waldren R, Teare I. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil. 1973;39(1):205–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical biochemistry. 1976;72(1–2):248–54. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Somogyi M. Notes on sugar determination. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1952;195:19–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Malik CP, Singh M. Plant enzymology and histo-enzymology. New Delhi, India: Kalyani Publishers; 1980. 434 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.European Pharmacopoeia. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare, Guide for the elaboration of monographs on herbal drugs and herbal drug preparations. France: Council of Europe; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.SAS-Institute-Inc. Base SAS 9.4 Procedures Guide: Statistical Procedures, Third Edition. USA: SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hammer Ø, Harper D, Ryan P. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 2001;4(1):e4, 9pp. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kassambara A, Mundt F. Factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. R Package Version 1.0.7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=factoextra2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shi C, Wei B, Wei S, Wang W, Liu H, Liu J. A quantitative discriminant method of elbow point for the optimal number of clusters in clustering algorithm. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. 2021;2021(1):1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rockwood LL. Introduction to population ecology. Chichester, West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons; 2015. 378 p p. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Anacker BL, Strauss SY. The geography and ecology of plant speciation: range overlap and niche divergence in sister species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2014;281(1778):e20132980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Givnish TJ. Ecology of plant speciation. Taxon. 2010;59(5):1326–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pontarotti P. Evolutionary biology: Convergent evolution, evolution of complex traits, concepts and methods. Switzerland: Springer; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.El-Metwally IM, Saudy HS. Interactional impacts of drought and weed stresses on nutritional status of seeds and water use efficiency of peanut plants grown in arid conditions. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2021;73(4):407–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Saudy HS, El-Metwally IM, Abd El-Samad GA. Physio-biochemical and nutrient constituents of peanut plants under bentazone herbicide for broad-leaved weed control and water regimes in dry land areas. Journal of Arid Land. 2020;12:630–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Klein B, Perry A. Ascorbic acid and vitamin A activity in selected vegetables from different geographical areas of the United States. Journal of Food Science. 1982;47(3):941–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Urbonavičiūtė A, Jakštas V, Kornyšova O, Janulis V, Maruška A. Capillary electrophoretic analysis of flavonoids in single-styled hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna Jacq.) ethanolic extracts. Journal of Chromatography A. 2006;1112(1–2):339–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Farokhi H, Asgharzadeh A, Kazemi Samadi M. Investigation of some growth and physiological traits changes and heavy metals accumulation in saffron (Crocus sativus L.) under different climates cultivation. Eco-phytochemical Journal of Medicinal Plants. 2022;10(1):114–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Guedri Mkaddem M, Zrig A, Ben Abdallah M, Romdhane M, Okla MK, Al-Hashimi A, et al. Variation of the Chemical Composition of Essential Oils and Total Phenols Content in Natural Populations of Marrubium vulgare L. Plants. 2022;11(5):612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Saberi M, Kamali N, Tarnian F, Sadeghipour A. Investigation Phenol, Flavonoids and Antioxidant Activity Content of Capparis spinosa in Three Natural Habitats of Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran. Journal of Rangeland Science. 2022;12(2):191–204. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Singh SM, Maurya VK. Phytochemical investigations and medicinal uses of Achyranthes aspera L.: A medicinal plant. In: Pandey RR, Kumar J, editors. Current Trends in Medicinal Chemistry. India: Thanuj International Publishers; 2022. p. 139–54. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Alia Ahmed

1 Mar 2023

PONE-D-23-02750Evaluation of biochemical, physiological traits and percentage of essential oil of sickleweed (Falcaria vulgaris) population in different geographical and climatic regionsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Rahimi,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR:

Abstract of the manuscript must be revised highlighting the methodology and results clearly. This section should contain all key results, and conclusion which is missing.

Introduction needs some careful attention. All the abbreviations on first appearance must be presented in full. Language is generally poor. In some places is it not quite clear what the authors meant to say. Line 13 perennial and perennial??? Line 14 genus Falcaria. Genus should be italicized. Moreover, population Gilan-Deylaman and Kur- 29 Gerger-e Sofla were also identified as superior populations??? Not clear. Units are missing in different parts of manuscript like in table 1 Height above sea level. Author mentioned in line 64 the importance of Identification of morphological diversity but not describe in the manuscript. Climatic factors are not investigated as a main objective of your work.   

Material and methods need improvement. This section is weak, we need complete procedures. All phytochemical analyzed in the study should be explained separately with subheadings like: Sample collection technique (plant collection): Sample Preparation: as each assay has a specific method of sample preparation or extraction. Phytochemicals: Each assay should be explained in this section with subheadings such as, Total chlorophyll: Total carotenoids:

Results are not discussed in appropriately. Discussion needs improvement with more references to support your findings.

Conclusions are not in support of your findings. Significant findings should be mentioned with recommendation.

 ==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 15 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alia Ahmed

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.  Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf  and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

“We gratefully acknowledge the research funding provided for this project (No. 99026928) by Iran National Science Foundation (INSF).”

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

“The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors conducted a study entitled "Evaluation of biochemical, physiological traits and percentage of essential oil of sickleweed (Falcaria vulgaris) population in different geographical and climatic regions"

I regret to inform you that I cannot recommend this work for publication in this prestigious journal.

For me the study is limited and important information should be inserted in the MS, the chemical composition of the essential oils should be investigated, a practical application of these oils and the correlation with the different collection times should be investigated, the information brought in the work is not sufficient to justify its publication.

Reviewer #2: Although samples from different environments cannot fully reflect the true genetic information, it also can screen out the most suitable populations of the same species in a given place.

There are still some minor problems in the manuscript that need further revision

1.In the introduction, the goal of breeding is not stated clearly. In line 84, what aspects of the best populations with breeding potential are considered and what are the criteria? It should be stated clearly in the preceding introduction.

2. in L151, what is the full name of PCV? phenotypic coefficient variation?Abbreviations should be given where the manuscript first appears

3.in L213-226, the specific traits of the three main groups are not described separately and are not marked in Figure 1.

4.The results in this manuscript are not well compared and analyzed with those already reported.

5.There is no detailed discussion on how the suitable or superior population is judged and compared, and what are their distinguishing features from other populations.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 21;18(6):e0287480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287480.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 0


21 Mar 2023

Dear Editor

Thank you for your useful comments and suggestions on the language and structure of our manuscript. We have modified the manuscript accordingly and showed in the revised MS by yellow highlighted and Track Changes. Also, detailed corrections are listed below point by point.

Thanks once again.

Best Regards

On behalf of the authors

ACADEMIC EDITOR:

Abstract of the manuscript must be revised highlighting the methodology and results clearly. This section should contain all key results, and conclusion which is missing.

Introduction needs some careful attention. All the abbreviations on first appearance must be presented in full. Language is generally poor. In some places is it not quite clear what the authors meant to say. Line 13 perennial and perennial??? Line 14 genus Falcaria. Genus should be italicized. Moreover, population Gilan-Deylaman and Kur- 29 Gerger-e Sofla were also identified as superior populations??? Not clear. Units are missing in different parts of manuscript like in table 1 Height above sea level. Author mentioned in line 64 the importance of Identification of morphological diversity but not describe in the manuscript. Climatic factors are not investigated as a main objective of your work.

Material and methods need improvement. This section is weak, we need complete procedures. All phytochemical analyzed in the study should be explained separately with subheadings like: Sample collection technique (plant collection): Sample Preparation: as each assay has a specific method of sample preparation or extraction. Phytochemicals: Each assay should be explained in this section with subheadings such as, Total chlorophyll: Total carotenoids:

Results are not discussed in appropriately. Discussion needs improvement with more references to support your findings.

Conclusions are not in support of your findings. Significant findings should be mentioned with recommendation.

Answer: All the things requested by the respected editor were done in the text and the article was corrected accordingly.

Reviewer comments

Reviewer #1

The authors conducted a study entitled "Evaluation of biochemical, physiological traits and percentage of essential oil of sickleweed (Falcaria vulgaris) population in different geographical and climatic regions"

I regret to inform you that I cannot recommend this work for publication in this prestigious journal.

For me the study is limited and important information should be inserted in the MS, the chemical composition of the essential oils should be investigated, a practical application of these oils and the correlation with the different collection times should be investigated, the information brought in the work is not sufficient to justify its publication.

Answer: In this article, the aim was not to investigate the chemical composition of the essential oil, and of course the opinion of the respected referee is correct and it can be a new article. The main goal was to investigate the effect of environments with different altitude, temperature and climate on biochemical traits and percentage of essential oil.

Graduate University of Advanced Technology (Kerman, Iran) to support this project.

Reviewer #2

Reviewer #2: Although samples from different environments cannot fully reflect the true genetic information, it also can screen out the most suitable populations of the same species in a given place. There are still some minor problems in the manuscript that need further revision

1.In the introduction, the goal of breeding is not stated clearly. In line 84, what aspects of the best populations with breeding potential are considered and what are the criteria? It should be stated clearly in the preceding introduction.

Answer: Corrected and revised in text

2. in L151, what is the full name of PCV? phenotypic coefficient variation?Abbreviations should be given where the manuscript first appears

Answer: Corrected in text

3.in L213-226, the specific traits of the three main groups are not described separately and are not marked in Figure 1.

Answer: Corrected in text

4.The results in this manuscript are not well compared and analyzed with those already reported.

Answer: Corrected in text

5.There is no detailed discussion on how the suitable or superior population is judged and compared, and what are their distinguishing features from other populations.

Answer: revised in text

We would like to give you a special thanks for your careful reading of the whole MS and also for your meaningful corrections that helped us a lot to improve our manuscript significantly. We have revised the manuscript according to your suggestions and the other reviewer’s suggestions and highlighted.

Best Regards

On behalf of the authors

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Alia Ahmed

12 May 2023

PONE-D-23-02750R1Evaluation of biochemical, physiological traits and percentage of essential oil of sickleweed (Falcaria vulgaris) population in different geographical and climatic regionsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Rahimi,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: Please ensure that your decision is justified on PLOS ONE’s publication criteria and not, for example, on novelty or perceived impact.

For Lab, Study and Registered Report Protocols: These article types are not expected to include results but may include pilot data. 

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by 12th June 2023. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alia Ahmed

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: Authors have done nice work on the 15 different sickleweed populations from seven provinces of the Iran. The data obtained will be helpful to choose sickleweed population in breeding programs. The work showed that there is variation among populations which is very important for further planning of research on sickleweed.

I recommend the paper for publication after following corrections.

Do following corrections:

Line Nos.:

139, hour to h

142, minute to min

146-147, degree Celsius to OC

154, two milliliters to 2 ml

156, degrees Celsius to OC

157, minute to min

157, two milliliters to 2 ml

199, started line with 19 bioclimatic indicators instead start with, “Bioclimatic indicators (19)”.

Conclusion is very lengthy and bit vague. Make is concise and to the point.

Reviewer #4: The authors should address the following:

• What are the ages of different Sickleweed plant obtained from each region?

• What is the reference of formula 1, 2, 3 and 4?

• Give some brief information for Elbow technique which used in clustering the regions?

• Conclusion should be shortened

• See the attached MS file and consider all required corrections

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: Yes: Hani Saudy

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Manuscript_Reviewer.docx

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 21;18(6):e0287480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287480.r005

Author response to Decision Letter 1


30 May 2023

Dear Editor

Thank you for your useful comments and suggestions on the language and structure of our manuscript. We have modified the manuscript accordingly and showed in the revised MS by yellow highlighted and Track Changes. Also, detailed corrections are listed below point by point.

Thanks once again.

Best Regards

On behalf of the authors

Reviewer comments

Reviewer #3:

Authors have done nice work on the 15 different sickleweed populations from seven provinces of the Iran. The data obtained will be helpful to choose sickleweed population in breeding programs. The work showed that there is variation among populations which is very important for further planning of research on sickleweed.

I recommend the paper for publication after following corrections.

Do following corrections:

Line Nos.:139, hour to h

Answer: Corrected in text

142, minute to min

Answer: Corrected in text

146-147, degree Celsius to OC

Answer: Corrected in text

154, two milliliters to 2 ml

Answer: Corrected in text

156, degrees Celsius to OC

Answer: Corrected in text

157, minute to min

Answer: Corrected in text

157, two milliliters to 2 ml

Answer: Corrected in text

199, started line with 19 bioclimatic indicators instead start with, “Bioclimatic indicators (19)”.

Answer: Corrected in text

Conclusion is very lengthy and bit vague. Make is concise and to the point.

Answer: The conclusion was summarized.

Reviewer #4

The authors should address the following:

What are the ages of different Sickleweed plant obtained from each region?

Answer: Corrected and revised in text. Although Sickleweed has been described as annual, biennial or perennial [13], but according to the authors' observations and evaluations, it was annual.

What is the reference of formula 1, 2, 3 and 4?

Answer: Corrected in text and the reference added to text.

Give some brief information for Elbow technique which used in clustering the regions?

Answer: Added in text and describe this method.

Conclusion should be shortened

Answer: The conclusion was summarized.

See the attached MS file and consider all required corrections

Answer: All required corrections in text based on suggestion and Also, suggested references were added to the text.

We would like to give you a special thanks for your careful reading of the whole MS and also for your meaningful corrections that helped us a lot to improve our manuscript significantly. We have revised the manuscript according to your suggestions and the other reviewer’s suggestions and highlighted.

Best Regards

On behalf of the authors

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Alia Ahmed

6 Jun 2023

Evaluation of biochemical, physiological traits and percentage of essential oil of sickleweed (Falcaria vulgaris) population in different geographical and climatic regions

PONE-D-23-02750R2

Dear Dr. Rahimi,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Alia Ahmed

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #4: frankly, the authors performed the correction in good manner. all issues have been addressed

the manuscript technically is sound, and do the data support the conclusions

the statistical analysis has been performed appropriately and rigorously

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #4: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Alia Ahmed

12 Jun 2023

PONE-D-23-02750R2

Evaluation of biochemical, physiological traits and percentage of essential oil of sickleweed (Falcaria vulgaris) population in different geographical and climatic regions

Dear Dr. Rahimi:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Alia Ahmed

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: reponse to Edits Amendment Required.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Manuscript_Reviewer.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES