Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2023 Jun 8;19(6):e1011425. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011425

Scalable cryopreservation of infectious Cryptosporidium hominis oocysts by vitrification

Justyna J Jaskiewicz 1,2,#, Denise Ann E Dayao 2,#, Donald Girouard 2, Derin Sevenler 1, Giovanni Widmer 2, Mehmet Toner 1, Saul Tzipori 2,*, Rebecca D Sandlin 1,*
Editor: Boris Striepen3
PMCID: PMC10284403  PMID: 37289815

Abstract

Cryptosporidium hominis is a serious cause of childhood diarrhea in developing countries. The development of therapeutics is impeded by major technical roadblocks including lack of cryopreservation and simple culturing methods. This impacts the availability of optimized/standardized singular sources of infectious parasite oocysts for research and human challenge studies. The human C. hominis TU502 isolate is currently propagated in gnotobiotic piglets in only one laboratory, which limits access to oocysts. Streamlined cryopreservation could enable creation of a biobank to serve as an oocyst source for research and distribution to other investigators requiring C. hominis. Here, we report cryopreservation of C. hominis TU502 oocysts by vitrification using specially designed specimen containers scaled to 100 μL volume. Thawed oocysts exhibit ~70% viability with robust excystation and 100% infection rate in gnotobiotic piglets. The availability of optimized/standardized sources of oocysts may streamline drug and vaccine evaluation by enabling wider access to biological specimens.

Author summary

We report here on the first successful method of cryopreservation of Cryptosporidium hominis parasites, one of the most common infectious causes of pediatric diarrhea in the developing world. This is significant as lack of cryopreservation methods for this species of parasite hinders progress of scientific and clinical research. In the absence of these methods, a reference isolate of C. hominis must be maintained periodically by passage in gnotobiotic piglets. Cryopreservation of this unique isolate is therefore a priority to increase sharing and availability for research, and to prevent catastrophic loss. Cryopreservation is also necessary to facilitate human challenge studies and clinical trials for the evaluation of therapeutics. Here, we successfully cryopreserved the parasite by vitrification using rapid cooling rates achieved in specially designed specimen containers. We showed that the thawed parasite retained viability and infectivity in gnotobiotic piglets. Notably these methods allowed us to establish a biobank of C. hominis oocysts of reference isolate TU502. The availability of biobanked optimized/standardized oocyst preparations may facilitate drug and vaccines evaluation.

Introduction

Cryptosporidiosis is a globally distributed gastrointestinal illness caused by infection with the apicomplexan parasite, Cryptosporidium. In developing regions of the world, Cryptosporidium ranks the 4th most common cause of infectious diarrhea of children leading to 8 million cases and 200,000 deaths annually [14]. The annual burden from pediatric cryptosporidiosis was estimated at >12 million disability-adjusted life-years accounting for malnutrition [5]. Cryptosporidiosis also causes life-threatening diarrhea among immunocompromised individuals, affecting the HIV/AIDS population disproportionately [6,7]. Outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis in developed nations are on the rise in the last decade [811]. Human infections are most frequently caused by C. hominis and C. parvum [3,12,13], with C. hominis accounting for nearly 95% of Cryptosporidium infections in some communities [1416]. In contrast to zoonotic C. parvum, C. hominis circulates predominantly between humans. Highly infectious and easily transmissible C. hominis leads to large outbreaks in association with recreational waters and direct contact with feces [1719]. No drugs or vaccines exist to relieve the disease burden in the most affected populations. Their development is hampered by many technical limitations, such as lacking methods for cryopreservation and simple in vitro culturing platforms, thereby requiring maintenance of laboratory isolates of C. hominis by passage in animals. Although successful infections have been established previously in rodent models [20] [21], laboratory maintenance of C. hominis is practical only in a gnotobiotic piglet model [22]. However, the cost, complexity and requirement for veterinary facilities and expertise restrict the common use of the gnotobiotic piglet model. Consequently, to our knowledge, only one laboratory isolate of C. hominis is currently maintained worldwide. Specifically, the C. hominis TU502 isolate derived from a Ugandan patient has been maintained for last two decades by serial passage in gnotobiotic piglets every 2–4 months in the Tzipori lab at Tufts University. The effort invested in propagation of this unique laboratory isolate underscores the need for cryopreservation. C. hominis TU502 has been extensively characterized, including its genome sequence [23,24], evaluation of host immune response to infection [20,2527], susceptibility to therapeutics [2830] and infectivity to humans [27]. This extensive information justifies designating this isolate the C. hominis reference. Cryopreservation of this unique isolate is therefore a priority, to increase sharing and availability, and protection from catastrophic loss. Further, cryopreservation would eliminate batch-to-batch variability among specimens utilized for clinical and therapeutic applications, which currently demands optimization, standardization, and in vitro validation for each propagated batch prior to evaluation at testing sites. A controlled infection of human subjects with standardized parasite preparations of known species can ascertain uniformity of the challenge dose and thereby facilitate execution of phase I and II clinical trials.

No effort to cryopreserve C. hominis has been reported to our knowledge. The repeated failures to preserve C. parvum oocysts by slow cooling [31,32], snap freezing [3335], or desiccation [33,34] have perhaps dampened enthusiasm for evaluation of these methods in C. hominis, given its limited availability. Several methods have been reported for preservation of C. parvum but have not been adopted since their publication, whether due to poor stability in storage above -20°C or lack of replication success [3538]. Prior preservation failures by classical methods of cooling led us to consider vitrification, an ice-free approach to cryopreservation where specimens are cooled rapidly through the glass transition to form an amorphous solid avoiding the formation of crystalline ice. Previously, we demonstrated successful preservation of infectious C. parvum oocysts by vitrification. This was first accomplished using silica microcapillaries (2 μL) and later scaled to larger volumes using specially designed high-aspect ratio cassettes [39,40], which allowed for sample volumes of ~200 μL. In these prior methods, the intracellular uptake of cryoprotective agents (CPA) was enabled by bleaching and additionally heightened by dehydration in trehalose. Although the concentration of CPA accumulated inside oocysts is unknown, cryopreservation of infectious C. parvum was achieved in microcapillaries and cassettes in extracellular CPA cocktails consisting of 0.5 M trehalose / 30% DMSO and 0.8 M trehalose / 50% DMSO, respectively. Here, we set to cryopreserve C. hominis by rapid cooling technologies, focusing our effort on vitrification in newly optimized cassettes. Due to C. hominis resistance to chemical permeabilization, the protocol developed for C. parvum is however not compatible. We have overcome this issue here by developing a thermal permeabilization technique which enables uptake of CPA at temperatures >30°C, followed by optimization of a CPA cocktail solution consisting of trehalose and DMSO, and rapid cooling to -196°C. For validation of the developed protocols, in vivo infectivity of cryopreserved C. hominis was tested in gnotobiotic piglets.

Results

Permeabilization of C. hominis oocysts to water and cryoprotective agents

The replacement of intracellular water with CPAs is required for optimal cryopreservation, particularly in the case of vitrification, where high water concentrations may lead to lethal ice crystallization upon rapid cooling. The impermeable nature of the oocyst wall prevents CPA uptake and removal of water and is therefore a major obstacle to cryopreservation. Here, to remove excess water from oocysts, the non-permeating CPA, trehalose, was examined. C. hominis oocysts responded to hyperosmotic gradient of trehalose by exclusion of intracellular water resulting in oocyst shrinkage, as observed previously with C. parvum [39]. Oocyst dehydration progressed as a function of trehalose concentration, leading to 80% of cellular volume loss in a 1 M solution (Fig 1A).

Fig 1. Permeabilization of C. hominis to water and cryoprotective agent.

Fig 1

a) Exclusion of water from oocysts was achieved under pressure of a hyperosmotic gradient of trehalose and is reported as change in oocyst volume (V, estimated oocyst volume; V0, starting volume of control oocysts in PBS). The concentration of trehalose (0 M, 0.33 M, 0.5 M and 1 M) is expressed as inverse osmolarity on the X-axis. Dehydration observed in response to the trehalose gradient is substantial (One-way ANOVA; p < 0.0001, F = 200, df = 11), and linear (Pearson`s correlation coefficient; R2 = 0.91). Data met requirements of normality (Shapiro-Wilk test; p > 0.21 for all trehalose concentrations) and homoscedasticity (Brown–Forsythe test; p = 0.47) for inclusion in ANOVA analysis. Values indicate mean and error bars indicate standard error (n = 3). b) The kinetics of DMSO toxicity were measured with 2-week-old oocysts in response to time and temperature of DMSO exposure. Oocysts were first dehydrated with 1 M trehalose for 10 min and then treated with a solution of DMSO to achieve a final concentration of 0.5 M trehalose/ 50% DMSO. DMSO-induced mortality was measured by PI inclusion using flow cytometry and was normalized to control oocysts treated with trehalose and PBS in lieu of DMSO. Increased temperature significantly accelerates mortality (Two-way ANOVA; p <0.0001, F = 214, df = 2 with requirements of normality homoscedasticity met: Shapiro-Wilk test; p >0.054 and Brown–Forsythe test; p >0.53), which is consistent with increased permeabilization and intracellular uptake of DMSO. Values indicate mean and error bars indicate standard error (n = 3). c) DIC micrographs in upper panel demonstrate shrink-swell response of oocysts during the multi-stage CPA loading procedure. Oocysts first shrink in response to 1 M trehalose and swell after exposure to DMSO for 2 min at 37°C (solid arrows). Control oocysts in the lower panel exposed to PBS in lieu of DMSO swell only minimally (dashed arrows) due to dilution of trehalose to 0.5 M and thus reduction of osmotic pressure. Scale indicates 5 μm.

While oocyst permeabilization to CPAs is possible with bleach treatment among C. parvum oocysts [39,40], this approach was not effective for C. hominis. Specifically, no lethality was observed among C. hominis oocysts exposed to toxic concentration of DMSO for 30 min following treatment with varying concentrations of sodium hypochlorite, suggesting that the treatment did not permeabilize oocysts (S1A Fig). As an alternative approach, thermal permeabilization was explored in an effort to melt lipid components of the oocyst wall [41]. Oocysts were incubated with 50% DMSO at either 30°C or 37°C for 30 min. The rapid onset of toxicity suggests CPA uptake occurs under these conditions (Fig 1B). While gradual onset of mortality in the presence of DMSO is observed at 30°C, the effect accelerates sharply at 37°C, leading to measurable toxicity within 5 min of incubation. In contrast, only negligible toxicity is noted at 21°C, suggesting little or no uptake of DMSO. Uptake of CPA at 37°C was also confirmed by microscopic observation of a shrink-swell response, where oocysts show an osmotic response consistent with intracellular uptake of DMSO (Fig 1C). We verified the method of thermal permeabilization to be replicable across different batches of oocysts. In contrast, chemical permeabilization by bleach or alkane treatment produced variable response across oocyst batches and thus was not considered for the development of CPA exposure protocols (S1B Fig).

Development of cryoprotective agent treatment parameters

While our data suggests that intracellular accumulation of DMSO is achieved in thermally permeabilized C. hominis oocysts, the concentration of CPA inside oocysts is unknown. This is critical as rapid cooling will likely cause lethal intracellular ice crystallization if insufficient CPA uptake occurs. To maximize intracellular CPA concentration, we examined the toxic effects of a 50% DMSO solution to identify conditions leading to minimal mortality. Based on the observed correlation between C. hominis oocyst age and permeability to CPA, where older oocysts respond to permeabilization by bleach (S1B Fig), we sought to evaluate this association in relation to thermal permeabilization. As expected, the observed variability in permeability to 50% DMSO at 30°C is age-dependent (p = 0.006, Fig 2A). However, increasing the permeabilization temperature to 37°C was found to effectively eliminate the age effect of permeabilization (p = 0.13, Fig 2B). Given that permeabilization at 37°C also accelerates DMSO uptake and leads to rapid onset of mortality, a shorter exposure was prioritized. We found that treatment with 1M trehalose followed by a 2 min exposure to 50% DMSO at 37°C reduces variability in mortality across all ages of oocysts (Fig 2B) and does not negatively impact excystation, i.e., the release of sporozoites in the presence of taurocholic acid, a type of bile salt (Fig 2C and 2D). Surprisingly, improved excystation in response to DMSO treatment alone was observed in the presence of taurocholic acid (Fig 2C). Since DMSO is a known solvent for hydrocarbons, we suspect it may remove the layer of lipid hydrocarbon reported to rest directly on the oocyst suture [41], thus exposing it more readily to bile acid. Similarly, a previously observed increase in excystation rate after bleaching is likely attributed to removal of fatty acids from oocyst wall [39,42]. The CPA loading protocol consisting of dehydration in 1 M trehalose followed by 2 min incubation in 50% DMSO at 37°C was therefore selected as the least toxic and most broadly applicable approach for CPA loading across oocyst age groups and batches.

Fig 2. Optimization of thermal permeabilization and cryoprotective agent exposure.

Fig 2

Matched 6- and 12-week-old C. hominis oocysts were dehydrated in 1 M trehalose (10 min) and then exposed to 50% DMSO at a) 30°C for 5–30 min or b) 37°C for 1–5 min. Oocyst mortality was measured by flow cytometry based on PI inclusion and was normalized to control oocysts treated with PBS in lieu of DMSO. A different response between oocyst ages is observed (Two-way ANOVA; **p = 0.006, F = 9.8, df = 1, Shapiro-Wilk normality test; p > 0.52, and Brown–Forsythe homoscedasticity test; p > 0.29). In contrast, exposure to DMSO at 37°C leads to rapid increase in toxicity with no differential age response (Two-way ANOVA; p = 0.13, F = 2.4, df = 1, Shapiro-Wilk normality test; p > 0.47, and Brown–Forsythe homoscedasticity test; p > 0.47 for all age and time conditions tested). Values indicate mean and error bars indicate standard error (n = 3). ns = non-significant. c) After exposure to 1M trehalose (10 min) and 50% DMSO (2 min, 37°C) or trehalose alone, functional viability was evaluated microscopically using an excystation assay. Excystation rate was calculated as a percent of oocysts which released sporozoites after 30 min incubation with 0.75% taurocholic acid at 37°C (induced) or in PBS at 37°C (spontaneous). ‘PBS’ control incubated under identical conditions in PBS in lieu of CPA determines baseline excystation. Exposure to DMSO substantially increases induced excystation with minimal effect on spontaneous breakdown. Lines indicate mean (n = 6). d) Micrographs demonstrate the extent of induced excystation in DMSO-treated oocysts in comparison to untreated oocysts. Solid arrows pointing to refractory oocysts indicate full unexcysted oocysts and dashed arrows indicate empty shells of excysted oocysts. Sporozoites released after DMSO-treatment are of comparable quality to those yielded by untreated oocysts. Scale indicates 20 μm.

C. hominis oocysts are amenable to vitrification by ultra-rapid cooling

The feasibility of vitrification as an approach to cryopreservation of C. hominis was first evaluated in silica microcapillaries (200 μm internal diameter, Fig 3A) to serve as proof of concept that oocysts are amenable to vitrification. Microcapillaries enable exceptionally rapid cooling rates upon submersion in liquid nitrogen, thus enabling vitrification in the presence of relatively low concentrations of CPAs [43]. Indeed, prior work with C. parvum demonstrated that cooling in microcapillaries enables vitrification in the absence of exogenous intracellular CPAs [39]. To determine the feasibility of C. hominis vitrification, oocysts were dehydrated in trehalose, followed by addition of DMSO to achieve a final CPA cocktail composition of 0.5 M trehalose/ 30% DMSO. Samples were then cooled at a rate of 250,000°C /min by rapidly submerging the microcapillaries in liquid nitrogen [43]. Oocyst viability among CPA toxicity controls was 98.1 ± 1.5% as evaluated by the propidium iodide (PI) exclusion assay, suggesting a lack of DMSO uptake (Fig 3B). Despite the apparent absence of intracellular CPA during cooling, 84.1 ± 3.7% oocysts were PI negative and presumed to be viable after thawing. Sporozoites excysted from vitrified oocysts were morphologically fit and often motile, resembling those excysted from fresh control oocysts (Fig 3C). Importantly, gnotobiotic piglets inoculated with oocysts thawed after 16–40 months of cryogenic storage developed a patent infection evidenced by fecal shedding of oocysts (Figs 3D and S2). Evaluation of thawed parasite infectivity at doses varying from 103 to 105 PI- oocysts per animal indicated that the minimal tested dose obtained from a single microcapillary produced a robust infection. Notably, fecal oocyst shedding started on the same day or shortly after as those infected with a matched dose of fresh control oocysts, indicating that fresh and cryopreserved inocula were of comparable infectivity. Micrographs of ileal sections demonstrating heavy infection of intestinal epithelium are evidence of infectivity after 40 months of cryogenic storage (Fig 3E), which is the longest time tested to date. Verification of oocyst identity was made after recovery from long-term cryogenic storage and subsequent animal passage, by 18S rRNA sequence analysis (S3 Fig). Details of all infections of gnotobiotic piglets with microcapillary-vitrified oocysts originating from five different batches are included in S1 Table. A detailed step-by-step protocol for ultra-rapid vitrification using the microcapillary can be found elsewhere [39].

Fig 3. Cryopreservation of infectious C. hominis oocysts by ultra-rapid vitrification.

Fig 3

a) Silica microcapillary used for vitrification. Scale indicates 1 cm. b) Viability was quantified using microscopy by means of propidium iodide (PI) exclusion in oocysts exposed to 0.5 M trehalose/ 30% DMSO for 5 min, both before (CPA control) and after cryogenic storage (vitrified). Values indicate mean and error bars indicate standard error (n = 6). c) Sporozoites excysted from oocysts vitrified in capillaries remain morphologically similar to fresh controls. Functional viability was assessed based on sporozoite structure, shape and observed motility in reference to fresh and killed control oocysts. Scale indicates 5 μm. d) C. hominis oocysts are infectious to gnotobiotic piglets after 16–40 months of cryogenic storage. To determine minimum infectious dose, piglets were inoculated orally with either 105 (n = 3), 104 (n = 1) or 103 thawed PI-oocysts (n = 1) in the presence of controls infected with 105 fresh oocysts (n = 4) and an uninfected control (n = 2). Aside from two inocula dosed at 105 oocysts, which were recovered after 40 months of cryogenic storage, the remainder of inocula were stored for 16 months. Fecal shedding of oocysts was determined daily by microscopic enumeration in 30 fields of acid-fast stained fecal smears examined at 1000x magnification. Values indicate mean of log transformed oocyst counts and bars indicate standard error. Untransformed infectivity data for each individual piglet can be found in S2 Fig. e) Micrographs of hematoxylin and eosin-stained ileal sections from piglets inoculated with oocysts, either fresh or cryopreserved in microcapillaries for 40 months, and from an uninfected control. Arrows indicate intracellular parasite stages located at the apex of enterocytes. Scale indicates 20μm.

Design and fabrication of high-aspect ratio ready-to-use container for vitrification of 100 μL samples

Restriction of the microcapillary volume to 2 μL limits implementation into a clinical and preclinical setting as it prevents storage of multiple inocula in a single device. To overcome the small volume of microcapillaries, a previously described vitrification cassette was used as a starting point for optimization [40]. The concept of the cassette is to utilize a high-aspect ratio geometry to reduce thermal mass and increase cooling rates to those consistent with vitrification. Here, we have redesigned major features of the device to improve its integrity, safety, and user experience (Fig 4A and 4B, with detailed dimensions described in S4 Fig). To first improve device integrity in liquid nitrogen, an acrylic-based adhesive resistant to cryogenic temperatures was used to connect two polycarbonate sheets. When cooled in liquid nitrogen, the device enables transition of a minimum 30% DMSO solution to a vitreous state (Fig 4C) where the estimated cooling rate of 104°C /min was extrapolated from published reports [44,45]. New features were also introduced to prevent sample leakage during cryostorage and thawing. Loading ports were outfitted with silicone tabs, both to act as closures, and to enable sample loading with a syringe (S5A Fig). For retrieval of the sample, exit ports were designed as cuttable channels located in the corners of the device (S5B Fig). Their dead-end design blocks entry of biospecimen and therefore prevents its aerosolization during sample retrieval, which improves safety for work with infectious agents. Lastly, the shape of the cassette was redesigned to facilitate evacuation of the sample by centrifugation in a conical tube (S5C Fig). This unloading strategy allows for recovery of 95.4 ± 2.3% of sample volume. Following the changes in dimensions, the cassette volume was reduced to 100 μL however the overall recovery of sample increased by 57.7 ± 6.25% in comparison to the previous design.

Fig 4. High aspect ratio cassette enables vitrification of scalable volumes.

Fig 4

a) The outer cassette dimensions are 25 mm by 75 mm with internal volume of approximately 100 μL. More details on dimensions are provided in S3 Fig. Silicone tabs are utilized as self-healing loading ports and pressure release ports, while unloading is performed by cutting exit ports with sterile scissors. Details of the sample loading and unloading technique are provided in S4 Fig. b) Cross sectional view of the cassette shows two polycarbonate sheets (thickness 180 μm) bonded by a sheet of pressure sensitive adhesive (thickness 86 μm) cut out to form a sample chamber. c) Plunging a sample of 20% DMSO into liquid nitrogen results in ice formation (top panel) and 30% DMSO forms a partial glass (middle panel). A solution of 40% DMSO forms a transparent amorphous glass, revealing the pattern of background surface, as assessed by visual inspection immediately after removing cassette from liquid nitrogen (bottom panel).

Cryopreservation of permeabilized C. hominis oocysts in vitrification cassettes

The use of vitrification cassettes to cryopreserve C. hominis oocysts was next examined. Here, four batches of oocysts were examined over the course of 14 weeks using the thermal permeabilization approach. Fig 5A describes the workflow of procedures used in these cryopreservation experiments (for detailed protocol, see S1 Protocol). First, oocysts were dehydrated in 1 M trehalose for 10 min and then suspended in DMSO to achieve a final concentration of 0.5 M trehalose / 50% DMSO. Exposure to DMSO occurred at either 30°C or 37°C for 2-, 5- or 10 min. Rapid cooling was achieved by loading oocysts into a vitrification cassette followed by its submersion in liquid nitrogen, where the sample remained for 30 min. For recovery from cryostorage, the sample was thawed in a 40°C water bath and allowed to equilibrate in an excess of PBS to dilute intracellular CPA and relieve cryogenic stress. Viability post cryopreservation was assessed in vitro by excystation and PI exclusion assays. The heatmap shown in Fig 5B demonstrates the percent of successful cryopreservation outcomes stratified by oocyst age, CPA exposure time and temperature. The criterion for positive and negative cryopreservation outcome was determined based on the presence or absence of motile and full-bodied sporozoites excysted from thawed oocysts, as shown in the micrograph panel in Fig 5B. Since we often observe release of lysed sporozoites from thawed oocysts, we determined that quantification of excystation rate would lead to overestimation of viability, and therefore we prioritized assessment of sporozoite quality as a binary variable instead.

Fig 5. C. hominis oocysts vitrified in cassettes are viable and excyst.

Fig 5

a) Prior to vitrification, oocysts were dehydrated in 1 M trehalose for 10 min and then incubated in 0.5 M trehalose/50% DMSO at either 30°C or 37°C for 2-, 5- or 10 min. Oocysts were then immediately loaded into cassettes and rapidly plunged into liquid nitrogen for 30 min. Oocysts were thawed by quickly transferring directly from liquid nitrogen to 40°C water for 10 sec. After removal of CPA by incubation in excess PBS for 30 min, viability was assessed based on PI exclusion and fitness of excysted sporozoites. b) The heat map indicates the percent of positive cryopreservation outcomes in relation to oocyst age and time of incubation in DMSO at a corresponding permeabilization temperature. Cryopreservation outcome was determined by an excystation assay based on sporozoite morphology and motility. Positive outcome is defined by the presence of full-bodied and motile sporozoites of correct curvature, in contrast to thin and non-motile (presumed dead) sporozoites, as demonstrated in DIC micrographs (scale indicates 5 μm). Each box indicates the number of successful trials over the number of total trials attempted. The CPA protocol including 2 min incubation in 0.5 M trehalose/50% DMSO at 37°C results in positive cryopreservation outcome irrespective of oocyst age. c) Oocyst viability was determined microscopically by means of PI exclusion, both before (CPA control) and after cryopreservation (vitrified) using the 2-min protocol of 0.5 M trehalose/50% DMSO exposure at 37°C. No difference in after-cryopreservation viability was observed across age groups (One-way ANOVA; p = 0.59, F = 0.63, df = 3, Shapiro-Wilk normality test; p > 0.16 for all age groups, Brown–Forsythe homoscedasticity test; p = 0.67). Lines indicate mean (n = 8–13).

The heatmap in Fig 5B reveals variable responses to vitrification across oocyst age groups, which is likely reflective of their permeability to CPA. Permeabilization at 30°C is an effective tool for delivery of sufficient CPA to support vitrification in oocysts older than 9 weeks, but not younger. As oocysts age, extended CPA exposure leads to a negative cryopreservation outcome, likely resulting from the accumulation of toxic concentrations of CPA related to increased oocyst permeability. This age-related effect is not apparent in oocysts permeabilized at 37°C for 2 min during CPA exposure. Although no difference in viability after vitrification was noted across age groups by means of PI exclusion (p = 0.59, Fig 5C), we observed a reduced quality of excystation in 12-14-week-old oocysts in 15% of trials. This trend is consistent with our previous findings with C. parvum and suggests that aged C. hominis oocysts are less likely to survive cryopreservation. Due to the consistent response of oocysts aged <10 weeks, the cryopreservation protocol including 2 min CPA exposure at 37°C was prioritized for in vivo validation. This cryopreservation protocol allows recovery of 30% of oocysts, of which 70–75% are viable. Specimen loss is likely due to oocyst retention in the cassette (45.8± 8.7%) and lysis resulting from cryopreservation and thawing (22.7± 9.0%, S6 Fig).

Infectivity of cryopreserved C. hominis in gnotobiotic piglet model

The infectivity of cryopreserved C. hominis oocysts was evaluated in newborn gnotobiotic piglets. Since the in vitro studies revealed that the fitness of oocysts for cryopreservation changes as a function of age, this effect was also evaluated in vivo. Piglets were infected with 105 PI- oocysts from four different batches cryopreserved at either 7–9 weeks or 12–14 weeks of age. Figs 6 and S7 show that younger oocysts cooled in cassettes following 2 min CPA exposure at 37°C were infectious to gnotobiotic piglets. Specifically, 80% of piglets (4/5) inoculated with cryopreserved oocysts developed a patent infection on 4-6th day post infection (dpi), with onset of shedding delayed by 1–3 days in comparison to control animals infected with fresh oocysts (Fig 6A). Histological examination of ileal sections however demonstrates that all piglets were infected (Fig 6B). In contrast, oocysts cryopreserved at an older age developed much delayed patent infection in 20% of piglets (1/5) (S8A Fig). Despite the lack of oocyst detection in feces, 80% of animals (4/5) became infected as evidenced by histological examination (S8B Fig). We expect that animals positive by histology but negative by fecal examination would have developed a patent infection if the observation period had been extended. Nevertheless, the observed delay in onset of fecal shedding and lower infectivity rate indicate that fewer oocysts survived cooling, suggesting that >12-week-old oocysts are less suitable for cryopreservation. This reduction in infectivity is analogous to that observed over time with unfrozen C. hominis oocysts, which loose infectivity after 24–28 weeks of storage at 4°C. Consistent with our in vitro findings summarized in the heatmap in Fig 5B, 13-week-old oocysts from a single batch cryopreserved after 2 min CPA exposure at 30°C infected 100% piglets (n = 3), even at a 10-fold reduced dose (S9 Fig). Although we advise cryopreservation of C. hominis at a younger age following CPA exposure at 37°C, a gentler permeabilization at 30°C could be considered for cryopreservation of oocysts older than 12 weeks. It is important to note that the handling procedure is sensitive to the surrounding temperature. For optimal results, all stages of the protocol should be performed at 21°C, with the exception of the brief thermal permeabilization step which is performed at higher temperatures. We observed that even small room temperature deviations (± 5°C) lead to lower viability after thawing (S10 Fig). Performance of the cassette vitrification protocol following 2 min CPA exposure at 37°C in age-matched C. parvum is comparable to C. hominis based on a preliminary in vitro assessment of viability and excystation (S11 Fig).

Fig 6. C. hominis oocysts aged <10 weeks vitrified in cassettes are infectious to gnotobiotic piglets.

Fig 6

a) C. hominis oocysts aged 7–10 weeks originating from two different batches were cryopreserved in cassettes using the 2-min protocol of 0.5 M trehalose/50% DMSO exposure at 37°C. Gnotobiotic piglets were inoculated orally with 500,000 thawed PI- oocysts (n = 5) in the presence of controls infected with 500,000 fresh, matched oocysts (n = 4) and negative controls (n = 3), of which 2 were uninoculated and 1 was inoculated with parasite frozen in absence of CPA. Fecal shedding of oocysts was determined daily by microscopic enumeration in 30 fields of acid-fast stained fecal smears examined under 1000x magnification. Eighty percent of piglets (4/5) produced a patent infection 1–3 days later than controls infected with fresh parasite. Values indicate mean of log transformed oocyst counts and bars indicate standard error. Untransformed infectivity data for each individual piglet can be found in S7 Fig. b) Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections collected at 8 dpi from an experimental piglet show evidence of intestinal infection in both piglets infected with cryopreserved oocysts that tested negative and positive by acid fast (AF) staining. Arrows indicate intracellular parasite stages located at the apex of enterocytes. Scale indicates 20μm.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first report of successful cryopreservation of infectious C. hominis oocysts. To establish feasibility of vitrification for cryopreservation of C. hominis, microcapillaries were first tested due to their extreme cooling rates which enables vitrification even at low CPA concentrations [43,45,46]. Indeed, the microcapillary facilitated cryopreservation of infectious oocysts using the trehalose/DMSO cocktail in the apparent absence of intracellular DMSO following the protocol developed for C. parvum. Specifically, based on the insignificant cytotoxicity in the presence of high DMSO concentrations, it is inferred that oocysts do not uptake DMSO at ambient temperature (Figs 1B and S1A). However, oocyst dehydration was observed in the presence of high osmolarity CPA solutions, suggesting that C. hominis oocysts are vitrified in a shrunken state, as observed previously in C. parvum [39]. It is likely that oocyst dehydration increases the concentration of native sugars, which favors vitrification in the absence of exogenous intracellular CPAs. Consistent with this view is the fact that the genome of both C. hominis and C. parvum encode pathways for synthesis of amylopectin and trehalose [23,47], which are known for their glass forming potential [48,49]. Regardless of the precise mechanism that facilitates cryopreservation in the absence of intracellular DMSO, successful vitrification by ultra-rapid cooling in microcapillaries demonstrates that vitrification of oocysts is possible.

Recognizing the small volume of the microcapillary as a major limitation, the high aspect ratio cassette was designed for scale up of the sample volume to 100 μL. Due to its size and material properties, the thermal conductivity of the cassette is reduced in comparison to that of microcapillary, therefore intracellular CPA is necessary for vitrification. C. hominis oocyst permeabilization was achieved through a novel approach of thermal permeabilization. This approach was inspired by observations with Mycobacterium bacteria, which are also known for their impermeability [50]. A relationship between M. chelonae permeability and heat was suggested after observing increased fluidity of outermost lipids at temperatures ranging 30–60°C [51]. The similarities in lipid composition and acid-fastness of mycobacterial cells and cryptosporidial oocysts led us to consider thermal treatment as a method of permeabilization [41]. Oocysts suspended in the CPA cocktail consisting of trehalose/DMSO appear to uptake DMSO during thermal treatment, as evidenced by onset of morality due to DMSO toxicity. Specifically, trehalose-dehydrated C. hominis oocysts were exposed to DMSO under thermal permeabilization conditions. Although the concentration of DMSO accumulated inside oocysts is unknown, 2 min of 50% DMSO exposure at 37°C resulted in successful cryopreservation. Additionally, permeabilization at 37°C eliminated the variable response to CPA uptake related to oocyst age. It would be especially interesting to determine whether this permeabilization protocol can be also utilized to address between-species variability and streamline the development of a broadly applicable cryopreservation protocol for other Cryptosporidium species, specifically wild-type and transgenic lines of C. parvum and C. tyzzeri. Preliminary assessment of protocol translation to C. parvum indicates comparable performance based on measurement of viability and excystation, however infectivity of thawed oocysts remains to be determined in a mouse infection model in future studies. In comparison with the method previously published for cassette vitrification of C. parvum [40], chemical permeabilization of C. parvum by bleaching leads to slower intracellular uptake of CPA and therefore prolongs exposure to highly toxic concentrations of CPAs required for vitrification in cassettes. To alleviate accumulation of substantial toxicity in chemically permeabilized C. parvum, DMSO was delivered in two steps over 11 min of incubation [40]. Regardless of the permeabilization method applied, C. parvum and C. hominis vitrified using cassettes in a cocktail consisting of trehalose and 50% DMSO survive at a rate of 70–80% and 65–75%, respectively and are infectious in vivo.

In this work we redesigned major features of the vitrification cassette to improve its integrity, safety, and user experience. We recognize however that small differences in loading and cooling technique impact post-cryopreservation viability. The extended time of cassette loading may result in accumulation of CPA toxicity prior to cooling, whereas manual plunging of the device into liquid nitrogen is subject to variations and results in inconsistent cooling rates. These limitations can lead to reduced recovery of infectious parasites after thawing. For example, in this study, among five animals which developed intestinal infection after inoculation with cassette-vitrified oocysts, one did not show signs of patent infection on microscopic examination (Fig 6). It is expected that this animal would have excreted oocysts if the observation period had been extended, as histology confirmed infection. Given the correlation between infectious dose and the onset of patent infection, we suspect that variations in cassette handling led to recovery of lower proportion of infectious oocysts in this instance. Automation of loading and cryopreservation steps could potentially eliminate user-driven variations in cassette handling and increase the rate of successful cryopreservation outcomes.

Our previous work with C. parvum revealed the impact of oocyst age on outcome of cryopreservation by vitrification, both in microcapillaries and cassettes. Irrespective of permeabilization adjustments made to correct for parasite age, oocysts vitrified at the age >12 weeks showed evidence of reduced infectivity in vitro and in vivo [39,40]. The age-related decline in fitness for vitrification using cassettes was also shown to exist in C. hominis. It may be explained by the gradual depletion of intracellular glass-forming nutrients observed by others in aging oocysts [38]. Regardless of the mechanism by which C. hominis oocysts loose fitness for cryopreservation, the data described here suggest that vitrification using the cassette with 37°C permeabilization protocol should be reserved only for oocysts < 10 weeks to ensure optimal recovery of infectious product. Since oocysts become more permeable to CPA with age, a gentler permeabilization protocol at 30°C could potentially be utilized when cryopreserving oocysts older than 12 weeks. Although we have not systematically tested age-related response to cryopreservation by the microcapillary method, cryopreservation of C. hominis was found possible at the age of <4 weeks. It is unclear whether the observed age-related change in infectivity of cryopreserved inocula is reflective of the genetic bottleneck or the variability in oocyst permeability, water content and concentration of native biomolecules etc., leading to variable survivability. Future studies determining metabolomic, transcriptomic and genetic differences between fresh and cryopreserved oocysts across age groups can identify features that enhance survival.

While the stability of cryogenic storage in microcapillaries was demonstrated over 40 months, the cassette storage did not exceed 30 min. At the estimated cooling rate of ~104°C/min, the sample is expected to equilibrate to -196°C within one second. At this temperature the enzymatic activity stalls, therefore despite its brevity, a short-term cryogenic storage period is representative of a long-term cryostorage assuming specimens are not perturbed during storage [52]. Previously we demonstrated C. parvum infectivity remains the same after minutes- or months-long storage in liquid nitrogen [39].

We recognize several limitations in implementation of this method into routine laboratory practice. First, the method requires execution of a precise cooling and thawing procedure and continuous storage in the liquid phase of nitrogen to prevent formation of ice crystals. The handling technique during submersion in liquid nitrogen and thawing are critical determinants of vitrification outcome and therefore specific training may be required. Additionally, accidental exposure to liquid nitrogen vapors during cryostorage may result in ice crystallization. Future studies assessing the stability of glass in the cassettes stored in the vapor phase of nitrogen will inform the design of cryostorage solutions. Lastly, the capacity for amplification of oocysts recovered from cryostorage is restricted by the availability of animal models of infection.

The cryopreservation methods reported here for C. hominis oocysts will allow users to maintain this isolate without the need for continuous passage is animals. Propagation of C. hominis relies on timely executed surgical derivation of gnotobiotic piglets, which is vulnerable to unforeseen events such as natural disasters, pandemics and supply chain disruptions. Implementation of cryopreservation into routine laboratory practice will considerably reduce resource investment and animal sacrifice, as well as ensure continuity of this important isolate in the event of catastrophic loss of fresh specimens. Further, the procedure could potentially be used to support routine biobanking and dissemination of parasites. Broader access to specimens could increase progress in vaccine and drug discovery and facilitate an improved understanding of parasite biology. Importantly, cryogenic storage may also facilitate standardized testing of drug and vaccine candidates in clinical trials. This has been thus far hindered by batch-to-batch variability observed in parasite generated from different passages in gnotobiotic piglets [27]. The ability to biobank multiple aliquots from a single batch and thaw as needed can eliminate batch-to-batch variability and thus ascertain uniformity of the challenge dose. Additionally, the cassette volume is compatible for trial use, as it enables storage of multiple inocula in a single device. Lastly, inclusion of C. hominis in clinical trials is preferable to reflect its overwhelming contribution to disease burden. The ability to cryopreserve C. hominis makes it now possible to rigorously study cryptosporidiosis in the context of human infection.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All animal experiments were performed at Tufts University as accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. All procedures involving swine species were conducted in compliance with study protocols G-2020-97 and G2020-116 approved by Tufts University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council).

Oocyst source and collection method

C. hominis, TU502 isolate was originally derived from a Ugandan diarrheic child and has been maintained for over two decades at Tufts University by serial passage in gnotobiotic piglets every 3–4 months [22,53]. Oocysts were obtained from feces collected daily from infected animals. Following ether extraction of fats from fecal slurry, oocysts were purified using nycodenz density gradient as described previously [54] and were stored afterwards at 4°C in PBS until use. C. parvum, Iowa isolate derived from infected calves was purchased from Bunch Grass Farms (Deary, ID) and was stored at 4°C in PBS containing penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (100 μg/mL).

Evaluation of oocyst dehydration in trehalose

The effects of trehalose on oocyst volume was examined as described in detail elsewhere [39]. Briefly, 2-week-old C. hominis oocysts were incubated in a solution of trehalose in PBS at concentrations ranging from 0.33–1 M for 10 min at room temperature. Oocyst volume (V) was regressed from the forward scatter signal recorded by flow cytometry (Accuri C6, BD Life Sciences) and compared to the starting volume (V0) in PBS. The standard curve of volume to forward scatter signal was established using polystyrene spherical particles of different diameters, specifically 2, 3.4, 5.1, 7.4, 10.5 and 14.7 μm (Spherotech Inc., Lake Forest, IL). The relationship between particle diameter and forward scatter is defined by Pearson`s correlation coefficient as linear (R2 = 0.93). The experiment was performed in triplicate and differences between treated and untreated oocysts were analyzed using one-way ANOVA.

Permeabilization of oocysts to extracellular CPAs

Chemical and thermal permeabilization was employed throughout the study to facilitate intracellular uptake of DMSO in C. hominis oocysts. Comparison of chemical and thermal permeabilization between five batches of C. hominis was performed in 6-7-week-old oocysts (S1 Fig). a) Chemical permeabilization. Where indicated, oocysts were permeabilized chemically by bleach or alkane treatment. Bleaching solution was prepared by dilution of commercial bleach containing 8.25% sodium hypochlorite (Clorox Original, The Clorox Company, CA) in PBS. Alkane solution was prepared by dilution of a mixture composed of 90% d-limonene, 5% ethoxylated alcohol and 5% diethanolamine in water as described elsewhere [55]. For bleaching, 2- or 6-7-week-old C. hominis oocysts were incubated on ice either in 5–20% or 20% dilutions of bleach for 1 min, respectively, for younger and older oocysts (S1A and S1B Fig). For alkane permeabilization, 6-7-week-old C. hominis oocysts were vortexed with 5% dilution of the prepared alkane solution for 1 min at room temperature (S1B Fig). Following either permeabilization, oocysts were washed three times by suspension in PBS and centrifugation (18,000 ×g, 2 min). Loading of extracellular CPA occurred after chemical permeabilization. Specifically, oocysts were dehydrated in 1 M trehalose (10 min) followed by incubation with 30% (S1A Fig) or 50% DMSO (S1B Fig) for 30 min. (b) Thermal permeabilization. Here, loading of CPA into C. hominis oocysts occurred during permeabilization by thermal treatment. Specifically, oocysts were incubated with 50% DMSO at 30°C or 37°C as described in detail below. For either permeabilization method, a control incubated with PBS for 30 min in lieu of DMSO was included for each species to normalize mortality. DMSO removal and measurement of DMSO-induced mortality in permeabilized oocysts are described in detail below. Experiments were performed in minimum of three replicates.

Optimization of DMSO toxicity in thermally permeabilized C. hominis

The kinetics of cytotoxicity induced by DMSO were measured in thermally permeabilized C. hominis oocysts. Specifically, 2-12-week-old oocysts were first dehydrated in 1 M trehalose for 10 min and then incubated with 50% DMSO for 1–30 min at 30°C or 37°C. A control incubated with PBS for 5–30 min in lieu of DMSO was included for each temperature condition. Additionally, an unpermeabilized oocyst control incubated with DMSO at 21°C was included as indicated (Fig 1B). DMSO was diluted out by incubation in excess PBS (1:100) for 30 min at room temperature and removed by centrifugation (18,000 ×g, 2 min). DMSO-induced mortality was measured by inclusion of propidium iodide using flow cytometry as described below and was normalized to a control incubated in PBS. Functional viability was measured by an excystation assay described in detail below. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

Vitrification cassettes

The vitrification cassette consists of two sheets of polycarbonate laminate (thickness 180 μm) bonded by a sheet of pressure sensitive adhesive (thickness 86 μm) cut out to form a sample chamber. The top sheet of polycarbonate features two holes (diameter 2.5 mm) on opposite ends of the chamber covered with silicone tabs (diameter 8 mm, thickness 0.5 mm), one serving as a sample loading port and the other as a port for release of pressure during loading. The sample is loaded using a syringe affixed to a 28 ga. needle pierced at angle through the silicone tab, while pressure is released at the opposite port perforated with a needle (S5A Fig). The device is outfitted with an exit port, where the corner can be cut with scissors for sample retrieval. The exit port is designed as a dead-end channel to prevent entry of biospecimen and to avoid splashes during cutting (S5B Fig). The cut cassette is then centrifuged in a 50 mL conical tube (200 ×g, 1 min) for easy removal of the contents from the device (S5C Fig). The cassette outer dimensions are 75 mm by 25 mm and the internal volume approximately 100 μL. Fabrication services were provided by Grace Bio-Labs (Bend, Oregon). The cassette can be produced in large quantities by Grace Bio-Labs by existing reel-to-reel manufacturing processes under catalog No. RD500893.

Vitrification of C. hominis using microcapillaries

A detailed protocol for ultra-rapid vitrification and long term storage using microcapillaries is described elsewhere [39]. Here, 2,000,000 of <4-week-old C. hominis oocysts were treated with 5% bleach for 1 min as described above. Oocysts were pelleted by centrifugation (18,000 ×g, 2 min) and supernatant was removed. The pellet was first resuspended in 1 M trehalose and after 10 min incubation DMSO was added to achieve the final concentration of 0.5 M trehalose/30% DMSO in 20 μL volume. Immediately after addition of DMSO, the sample was loaded into 10 silica microcapillaries (Postnova Analytics Inc., catalog Z-FSS-200280, cut to 7 cm length) by capillary action and plunged into liquid nitrogen, one by one. The total time of capillary loading and immersion in liquid nitrogen did not exceed 5 min. Microcapillaries remained in liquid nitrogen for 10 min before thawing or were transferred to liquid nitrogen tank for long-term storage ranging from 2–40 months as indicated in S1 Table. Thawing was achieved by quickly transferring microcapillaries from liquid nitrogen to a 37°C water bath for 10 sec followed by immediate removal of biospecimen, one microcapillary at the time. The contents were expelled by flushing each microcapillary with 100 μL PBS using a syringe and a 30 ga. needle (BD). Expelled oocysts were incubated in a total of 1 mL PBS at room temperature for 30 min to facilitate CPA dilution. PBS was then removed by centrifugation (18,000 ×g, 2 min) and 100 μL of PBS was used to resuspend the pellet. Thawed oocysts were stored on ice prior to further testing. Oocysts used for animal infection were sterilized by incubation with 0.06% hexadecylpyridinium chloride monohydrate (HPC) for 10 min at room temperature and washed three times with PBS by centrifugation (18,000 ×g, 2 min). Sterilization with HPC on ice is strongly discouraged due to observed HPC precipitation and lysing effect on oocysts.

Vitrification of C. hominis using cassette

An aliquot of 1,000,000–4,000,000 C. hominis oocysts was centrifuged (18,000 ×g, 2 min) and supernatant was removed. The pellet was resuspended in 50 μL of 1 M trehalose and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Next, 50 μL of prewarmed 100% DMSO was added to dehydrated oocysts to achieve the concentration of 0.5 M trehalose/50% DMSO and was incubated on a heat block for either 2 min at 37°C or 2–10 min at 30°C. Immediately following incubation, 100 μL of sample was loaded into polycarbonate cassettes (Grace Bio-Labs, catalog No. RD500893) using syringe and a ≥ 28 ga. blunt needle. As sample is expelled through the loading port, displaced air is evacuated through the opposite port perforated by a needle as shown in S5A Fig. When the sample is deposited in the chamber, a syringe is used at the opposite port to remove remaining air through the needle to ensure uniform distribution of sample in the chamber. It is critical that loading is performed at temperatures not exceeding 21°C and is completed within 1 min. Immediately after loading, the cassette was plunged into liquid nitrogen. Although the sample reaches cryogenic temperatures nearly instantaneously at the cooling rate of ~104°C/min, oocysts were maintained in liquid nitrogen for 30 min prior to thawing. Oocysts exposed to cryoprotective cocktails for ~3 min (2 min incubation plus time equivalent to cassette loading ~40-50s) but not vitrified were also studied to assess toxic effects of CPA in the absence of cryopreservation (CPA control). For thawing, the cassette was rapidly transferred from liquid nitrogen to a 40°C water bath for 10 seconds. It is critical that the cassette be rapidly transferred into liquid nitrogen for cooling, as well as from liquid nitrogen to the water bath during thawing, to avoid detrimental crystallization of ice. The sample was then recovered from cassettes by centrifugation. Specifically, exit channels were cut open on both ends with scissors and the cassette was placed in a 50 mL conical tube containing 3 mL of PBS for centrifugation (200 ×g, 1 min, S5C Fig). Expelled sample was further diluted with 2 mL PBS to reduce DMSO concentration to 1% and was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The sample was then reduced to 100 μL by centrifugation (2,500 ×g, 10 min) and removal of supernatant. Thawed oocysts were stored on ice prior to further testing. Before animal infection, oocysts were suspended in in PBS containing penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (100 μg/mL).

In vitro viability assays

Oocyst survival before and after vitrification was measured following removal of DMSO using viability and excystation assays. Viability was measured in whole oocysts by means of propidium iodide (PI) exclusion at 10 μg/mL using flow cytometry (Accuri C6, BD Life Sciences) or fluorescent microscopy (400x) as indicated in figure captions. For excystation assay, oocysts were incubated in 0.75% taurocholic acid in PBS at 37°C in a water bath for 30 min. In cryopreserved samples, the viability of excysted sporozoites was assessed qualitatively by microscopy on basis of shape, structure and observed motility (Fig 5B). Determination of the cryopreservation outcome based on microscopic assessment of excysted sporozoites was performed by non-blinded investigators. DIC micrographs (600x) of sporozoites shown in Figs 3C and 5B, were taken using Nikon Eclipse Ti-E microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc.). For measurement of CPA toxicity prior to vitrification, the functional viability of excysted sporozoites was evaluated quantitatively and compared to control oocysts incubated in identical conditions in PBS in lieu of CPA: trehalose and/or DMSO (Fig 2C). The rate of excystation was calculated as a percent of empty oocysts observed microscopically after incubation at 37°C either in taurocholic acid or PBS, for evaluation of induced or spontaneous excystation, respectively. Micrographs (400x) of sporozoites shown in Fig 2D were generated using an EVOS digital microscope (Life Technologies).

Evaluation of infectivity in the gnotobiotic piglet model

The infectivity of cryopreserved C. hominis oocysts was tested in 1-2-day old gnotobiotic piglets (Sus scrofa domesticus). Healthy pregnant sows were obtained from Tufts Working Farm (North Grafton, MA) or from Parson`s Farm (Hadley, MA). Piglets were surgically derived at Tufts University by Cesarean section performed in sterile surgical isolators by trained personnel under the supervision of a veterinary surgeon. Throughout the procedure sows were continuously anesthetized by inhalation with isoflurane (1 mL/4.5 kg) following sedation with tiletamine and zolazepam administered i.m. (Telazol, 800–1000 mg/animal). Following derivation and resuscitation, piglets were transferred sterilely into plastic microbiological isolator units and placed in 32°C room, where they were maintained under germ-free conditions throughout experimentation. Piglets were fed 3 times daily with a total of 500–700 mL/day of human infant milk replacer (Similac). Piglets were monitored a minimum of 3 times each day. After 24-48h of observation, healthy piglets were randomly distributed into groups of 1–4 piglets per isolator, such that experimental groups were kept separate from controls. To ensure that inocula were free of bacterial contamination, oocysts cryopreserved in microcapillaries were sterilized with 0.06% hexadecylpyridinium chloride monohydrate (Sigma) for 10 min at room temperature, and fresh oocysts with 10% bleach (Clorox) for 10 min on ice, after which oocysts were washed three times with PBS by centrifugation (18,000 ×g, 2 min), while oocysts cryopreserved in cassettes were suspended in a solution containing penicillin and streptomycin before inoculation. Piglets were inoculated orally with 500,000–1,000,000 PI- cryopreserved oocysts in PBS suspension. For each batch of experiments, a positive control group inoculated with 5,000–1,000,000 matched fresh oocysts was included and utilized for parasite propagation. Whenever litter size allowed, uninfected piglets were included as negative controls, which were either uninoculated or inoculated with matched dose of dead oocysts previously frozen in the absence of CPAs. Starting from 3 dpi piglets were monitored daily for fecal shedding of oocysts. A smear of fecal sample obtained by rectal swab was acid-fast stained and inspected microscopically for the presence of oocysts in 30 fields (1000x). At termination of experiment on 8 dpi at the latest, piglets were euthanized by intracardiac injection of phenytoin and pentobarbital (Beuthanasia or Somnasol, 100 mg/kg) following i.m. administration of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (5 mg/kg). The sow was euthanized immediately following piglet derivation with intracardiac injection of Beuthanasia or Somnasol (100 mg/kg) while anesthetized by inhalation with isoflurane. Sections of small and large intestines were collected postmortem from piglets for preparation of histological sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

18S rRNA gene alignment

A portion of small subunit 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) gene from C. hominis oocysts recovered from piglets after 12 months of cryogenic storage in microcapillaries, was compared to a reference 18S rRNA gene of C. hominis (AF093491). Additionally, a sequence from matched C. hominis oocysts before cryopreservation and C. parvum (Iowa) oocysts were included as controls. Briefly, parasite DNA was obtained from fecal samples or from purified oocysts using QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen). The 18S rRNA gene was then amplified in a nested PCR reaction using primers specific to Cryptosporidium 18S rRNA, specifically the set of primary primers: forward (5’-TTCTAGAGCTAATACATGCG-3’) and reverse (5’-CCCATTTCCTTCGAAACAGGA-3’) and secondary primers: forward (5’-GGAAGGGTTGTATTT ATTAGATAAAG-3’) and reverse (5’-AAGGAGTAAGGAACAACCTCCA-3’) [56], yielding a 780 bp long amplicon. Sanger sequencing services were provided by Genewiz (Cambridge, MA). Sequences were aligned with ClustalW software and the alignment displayed with BioEdit [57].

Statistical analysis

All in vitro experiments were performed with a minimum of three replicates to ensure reproducibility. Graphing and statistical analyses of data were done using GraphPad Prism software (v 9.1.0, GraphPad Software, Inc.). All data included in ANOVA analyses were tested for requirement of normality with Shapiro-Wilk test and homoscedasticity with Brown-Forsythe test.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Summary of C. hominis infectivity in gnotobiotic piglet after cryopreservation using microcapillary method.

(PDF)

S1 Fig. Chemical permeabilization of C. hominis results in variable cryoprotective agent uptake.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. C. hominis oocysts vitrified in microcapillaries are infectious to gnotobiotic piglets (untransformed individual data plot).

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Alignment of 18s rRNA gene from C. hominis oocysts before and after cryopreservation in microcapillaries.

(PDF)

S4 Fig. High aspect ratio cassette design.

(PDF)

S5 Fig. Strategy for cassette loading and unloading.

(PDF)

S6 Fig. Recovery of oocyst sample from cassette.

(PDF)

S7 Fig. C. hominis oocysts aged < 10 weeks vitrified in cassettes are infectious to gnotobiotic piglets (untransformed individual data plot).

(PDF)

S8 Fig. Reduction in infectivity of C. hominis aged > 12 weeks cryopreserved in cassettes using 37°C permeabilization protocol.

(PDF)

S9 Fig. Infectivity of C. hominis cryopreserved in cassettes using 30°C permeabilization protocol.

(PDF)

S10 Fig. Cryopreservation protocol is sensitive to variation in room temperature.

(PDF)

S11 Fig. Comparison of the cryoprotective protocol between C. hominis and C. parvum oocysts.

(PDF)

S1 Protocol. Rapid cooling of C. hominis oocysts using high aspect ratio cassettes.

(PDF)

S1 Data. Supporting Information Data files.

(ZIP)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Jennipher Grudzien from Grace Bio-Labs for help with fabrication of the high-aspect ratio cassette.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Supporting Information Data files.

Funding Statement

The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health award R21AI154026 granted to R.D.S. and S.T., the National Science Foundation award EEC 1941543 granted to M.T. and the Good Ventures Foundation award granted to S.T. Support from R21AI154026 was received by J.J., R.S, M.T., G.W., and S.T., from EEC 1941543 by J.J., D.S., M.T. and R.S., and from Good Ventures Foundation award by S.T. and D.D. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Liu J, Platts-Mills JA, Juma J, Kabir F, Nkeze J, Okoi C, et al. Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to identify causes of diarrhoea in children: a reanalysis of the GEMS case-control study. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1291–301. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31529-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kotloff KL, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Nataro JP, Farag TH, van Eijk A, et al. The Global Enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS) of Diarrheal Disease in Infants and Young Children in Developing Countries: Epidemiologic and Clinical Methods of the Case/Control Study. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2012;55:S232–S45. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sow SO, Muhsen K, Nasrin D, Blackwelder WC, Wu Y, Farag TH, et al. The Burden of Cryptosporidium Diarrheal Disease among Children < 24 Months of Age in Moderate/High Mortality Regions of Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, Utilizing Data from the Global Enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS). PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(5):e0004729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Platts-Mills JA, Babji S, Bodhidatta L, Gratz J, Haque R, Havt A, et al. Pathogen-specific burdens of community diarrhoea in developing countries: a multisite birth cohort study (MAL-ED). Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(9):e564–75. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00151-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Khalil IA, Troeger C, Rao PC, Blacker BF, Brown A, Brewer TG, et al. Morbidity, mortality, and long-term consequences associated with diarrhoea from Cryptosporidium infection in children younger than 5 years: a meta-analyses study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(7):e758–e68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tzipori S, Widmer G. A hundred-year retrospective on cryptosporidiosis. Trends in Parasitology. 2008;24(4):184–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2008.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mohebali M, Yimam Y, Woreta A. Cryptosporidium infection among people living with HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathog Glob Health. 2020;114(4):183–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rimseliene G, Vold L, Robertson L, Nelke C, Soli K, Johansen OH, et al. An outbreak of gastroenteritis among schoolchildren staying in a wildlife reserve: thorough investigation reveals Norway’s largest cryptosporidiosis outbreak. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(3):287–95. doi: 10.1177/1403494810396557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reh L, Muadica AS, Köster PC, Balasegaram S, Verlander NQ, Chércoles ER, et al. Substantial prevalence of enteroparasites Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Blastocystis sp. in asymptomatic schoolchildren in Madrid, Spain, November 2017 to June 2018. Euro Surveill. 2019;24(43). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Monge S, Pijnacker R, van Pelt W, Franz E, Kortbeek LM, Mangen MJ. Accounting for long-term manifestations of Cryptosporidium spp infection in burden of disease and cost-of-illness estimations, the Netherlands (2013–2017). PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gharpure R, Perez A, Miller AD, Wikswo ME, Silver R, Hlavsa MC. Cryptosporidiosis Outbreaks—United States, 2009–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(25):568–72. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6825a3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bouzid M, Tyler KM, Christen R, Chalmers RM, Elwin K, Hunter PR. Multi-locus analysis of human infective Cryptosporidium species and subtypes using ten novel genetic loci. BMC Microbiology. 2010;10:213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chalmers RM, Smith R, Elwin K, Clifton-Hadley FA, Giles M. Epidemiology of anthroponotic and zoonotic human cryptosporidiosis in England and Wales, 2004–2006. Epidemiol Infect. 2011;139(5):700–12. doi: 10.1017/S0950268810001688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cama VA, Bern C, Roberts J, Cabrera L, Sterling CR, Ortega Y, et al. Cryptosporidium species and subtypes and clinical manifestations in children, Peru. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14(10):1567–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Caccio SM. Molecular epidemiology of human cryptosporidiosis. Parassitologia. 2005;47(2):185–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Krumkamp R, Aldrich C, Maiga-Ascofare O, Mbwana J, Rakotozandrindrainy N, Borrmann S, et al. Transmission of Cryptosporidium Species Among Human and Animal Local Contact Networks in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multicountry Study. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021;72(8):1358–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gertler M, Durr M, Renner P, Poppert S, Askar M, Breidenbach J, et al. Outbreak of Cryptosporidium hominis following river flooding in the city of Halle (Saale), Germany, August 2013. BMC infectious diseases. 2015;15(1):807–. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Widerstrom M, Schonning C, Lilja M, Lebbad M, Ljung T, Allestam G, et al. Large Outbreak of Cryptosporidium hominis Infection Transmitted through the Public Water Supply, Sweden. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(4):581–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Turabelidze G, Lin M, Weiser T, Zhu B-P. Communitywide Outbreak of Cryptosporidiosis in Rural Missouri Associated With Attendance at Child Care Centers. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2007;161(9):878–83. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.9.878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dayao DA, Sheoran A, Carvalho A, Xu H, Beamer G, Widmer G, et al. An immunocompetent rat model of infection with Cryptosporidium species: Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum. Int J Parasitol. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baishanbo A, Gargala G, Delaunay A, Francois A, Ballet JJ, Favennec L. Infectivity of Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum genotype 2 isolates in immunosuppressed Mongolian gerbils. Infect Immun. 2005;73(8):5252–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Akiyoshi DE, Feng X, Buckholt MA, Widmer G, Tzipori S. Genetic analysis of a Cryptosporidium parvum human genotype 1 isolate passaged through different host species. Infect Immun. 2002;70(10):5670–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xu P, Widmer G, Wang YP, Ozaki LS, Alves JM, Serrano MG, et al. The genome of Cryptosporidium hominis (vol 431, pg 1107, 2004). Nature. 2004;432(7015):415–. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ifeonu OO, Chibucos MC, Orvis J, Su Q, Elwin K, Guo F, et al. Annotated draft genome sequences of three species of Cryptosporidium: Cryptosporidium meleagridis isolate UKMEL1, C. baileyi isolate TAMU-09Q1 and C. hominis isolates TU502_2012 and UKH1. Pathog Dis. 2016;74(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sheoran A, Wiffin A, Widmer G, Singh P, Tzipori S. Infection With Cryptosporidium hominis Provides Incomplete Protection of the Host Against Cryptosporidium parvum. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2012;205(6):1019–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sheoran AS, Pina-Mimbela R, Keleher A, Girouard D, Tzipori S. Infection with anthroponotic Cryptosporidium parvum does not fully protect the host against a subsequent challenge with C. hominis. Microbes Infect. 2018;20(4):267–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chappell CL, Okhuysen PC, Langer-Curry R, Widmer G, Akiyoshi DE, Tanriverdi S, et al. Cryptosporidium hominis: Experimental challenge of healthy adults. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2006;75(5):851–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee S, Ginese M, Girouard D, Beamer G, Huston CD, Osbourn D, et al. Piperazine-Derivative MMV665917: An Effective Drug in the Diarrheic Piglet Model of Cryptosporidium hominis. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2019;220(2):285–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee S. The therapeutic efficacy of azithromycin and nitazoxanide in the acute pig model of Cryptosporidium hominis. 2017;12(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lee S, Ginese M, Beamer G, Danz HR, Girouard DJ, Chapman-Bonofiglio SP, et al. Therapeutic Efficacy of Bumped Kinase Inhibitor 1369 in a Pig Model of Acute Diarrhea Caused by Cryptosporidium hominis. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2018;62(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim HC, Healey MC. Infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts following cryopreservation. The Journal of parasitology. 2001;87(5):1191–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fayer R, Nerad T, Rall W, Lindsay DS, Blagburn BL. Studies on cryopreservation of Cryptosporidium parvum. The Journal of parasitology. 1991;77(3):357–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sherwood D, Angus KW, Snodgrass DR, Tzipori S. Experimental cryptosporidiosis in laboratory mice. Infect Immun. 1982;38(2):471–5. doi: 10.1128/iai.38.2.471-475.1982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Robertson LJ, Campbell AT, Smith HV. Survival of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts under various environmental pressures. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992;58(11):3494–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rossi P, Pozio E, Besse MG. Cryopreservation of Cryptosporidium sp. oocysts. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1990;84(1):68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rhee JK, Park BK. Survival of Cryptosporidium muris (strain MCR) oocysts under cryopreservation. Korean J Parasitol. 1996;34(2):155–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fayer R, Nerad T. Effects of low temperatures on viability of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(4):1431–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fayer R, Trout JM, Jenkins MC. Infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts stored in water at environmental temperatures. The Journal of parasitology. 1998;84(6):1165–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jaskiewicz JJ, Sandlin RD, Swei AA, Widmer G, Toner M, Tzipori S. Cryopreservation of infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. Nature communications. 2018;9(1):2883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jaskiewicz JJ, Sevenler D, Swei AA, Widmer G, Toner M, Tzipori S, et al. Cryopreservation of infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts achieved through vitrification using high aspect ratio specimen containers. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):11711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jenkins MB, Eaglesham BS, Anthony LC, Kachlany SC, Bowman DD, Ghiorse WC. Significance of wall structure, macromolecular composition, and surface polymers to the survival and transport of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(6):1926–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Robertson LJ, Campbell AT, Smith HV. In vitro excystation of Cryptosporidium parvum. Parasitology. 1993;106 (Pt 1):13–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Heo YS, Nagrath S, Moore AL, Zeinali M, Irimia D, Stott SL, et al. "Universal" vitrification of cells by ultra-fast cooling. Technology (Singap World Sci). 2015;3(1):64–71. doi: 10.1142/S2339547815500053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hopkins JB, Badeau R, Warkentin M, Thorne RE. Effect of common cryoprotectants on critical warming rates and ice formation in aqueous solutions. Cryobiology. 2012;65(3):169–78. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.05.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.He X, Park EY, Fowler A, Yarmush ML, Toner M. Vitrification by ultra-fast cooling at a low concentration of cryoprotectants in a quartz micro-capillary: a study using murine embryonic stem cells. Cryobiology. 2008;56(3):223–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2008.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lee HJ, Elmoazzen H, Wright D, Biggers J, Rueda BR, Heo YS, et al. Ultra-rapid vitrification of mouse oocytes in low cryoprotectant concentrations. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20(2):201–8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Abrahamsen MS, Templeton TJ, Enomoto S, Abrahante JE, Zhu G, Lancto CA, et al. Complete genome sequence of the apicomplexan, Cryptosporidium parvum. Science. 2004;304(5669):441–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Olgenblum GI, Sapir L, Harries D. Properties of Aqueous Trehalose Mixtures: Glass Transition and Hydrogen Bonding. J Chem Theory Comput. 2020;16(2):1249–62. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kalichevsky MT, Jaroszkiewicz EM, Blanshard JMV. A study of the glass transition of amylopectin—sugar mixtures. Polymer. 1993;34(2):346–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jarlier V, Nikaido H. Mycobacterial cell wall: structure and role in natural resistance to antibiotics. FEMS microbiology letters. 1994;123(1–2):11–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07194.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liu J, Rosenberg EY, Nikaido H. Fluidity of the lipid domain of cell wall from Mycobacterium chelonae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(24):11254–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Karlsson JO, Toner M. Long-term storage of tissues by cryopreservation: critical issues. Biomaterials. 1996;17(3):243–56. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)85562-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lee S, Beamer G, Tzipori S. The piglet acute diarrhea model for evaluating efficacy of treatment and control of cryptosporidiosis. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(6):1445–52. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1498436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Akiyoshi DE, Dilo J, Pearson C, Chapman S, Tumwine J, Tzipori S. Characterization of Cryptosporidium meleagridis of Human Origin Passaged through Different Host Species. Infect Immun. 2003;71(4):1828–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rand MD. A method of permeabilization of Drosophila embryos for assays of small molecule activity. J Vis Exp. 2014(89). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Koehler AV, Šlapeta J. Use of Markers to Determine Cryptosporidium Genotypes for Epidemiology Tracking and Detection. In: Mead JR, Arrowood MJ, editors. Cryptosporidium: Methods and Protocols. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2020. p. 117–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Widnows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. 1999. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

P'ng Loke, Boris Striepen

29 Mar 2023

Dear Dr. Sandling,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Scalable cryopreservation of infectious Cryptosporidium hominis oocysts by vitrification." for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

This is a technical paper focused on cryopreservation of C. hominis. Despite some advances, freezing parasites remains a major bottleneck of research with this important pathogen. Previous protocols have not found wide application yet due to several technical issues. All reviewers found the experimentation rigorous and supportive of the claims. While somewhat incremental in advance, this is an important step forward that should benefit multiple lines of Cryptosporidium research, most importantly, it should help to collect and store a variety of strains, both natural and transgenic. The editor agrees with the comments made by the reviewers that ask the authors to adjust some of the claims to the strength of the evidence, to discuss remaining limitations of the methods, and to step back a from the statement that C. hominis as the only appropriate model for research and drug and vaccine trials. Work over the last years e.g. has demonstrated C. parvum to be a solid predicted of drug susceptibility of C. hominis. Lastly, I might have overlooked this, but as this a pure methods paper, a detailed supplemental step by step protocol that includes where to purchase specialized materials like the cassettes would help to spread the technology throughout the field.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Boris Striepen

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

P'ng Loke

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

This is a technical paper focused on cryopreservation of C. hominis. Despite some advances, freezing parasites remains a major bottleneck of research with this important pathogen. Previous protocol have not found wide application due to the special equipment needed. All reviewers found the experimentation rigorous and supportive of the claims. While somewhat incremental, this is an important step forward that should benefit multiple lines of Cryptosporidium research, most importantly, it should help to collect and store a variety of strains, both natural and transgenic. The editor agrees with the comments made by the reviewers that ask the authors to adjust some of the claims to the strength of the evidence, to discuss remaining limitations of the methods, and to step back a little from the statement that C. hominis as the only appropriate model for research and drug and vaccine trials. Work over the last years e.g. has demonstrated C. parvum to be a solid predicted of drug susceptibility of C. hominis. Lastly, I might have overlooked this, but as this a pure methods paper, a detailed supplemental step by step protocol that includes where to purchase specialized materials like the cassettes would help to spread the technology throughout the field.

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: This paper extends prior work from this group on cryopreservation of Cryptosporidium parvum to include Cryptosporidium hominis. The work appears to be technically excellent, and the manuscript is presented clearly. This would be an unusual paper for publication in PLoS Pathogens, but that is a decision for the editor, and there is no doubt this in an important technical advance for Cryptosporidium research. I have no major issues with the manuscript, but several editorial concerns noted below.

Reviewer #2: The authors present data about a new method for cryopreservation of C. hominis. This is a very welcome technology as there is currently no way to freeze down C. hominis and therefore this species must currently be maintained in gnobiotic piglet models. This animal model is challenging, expensive, and not easily accessed. Having a way to freeze down strains rather than regularly passage strains will be of great use.

Lines 84-85: I think a longer summary of the method that works for cryopreservation of C. Parvum is required. This includes the fact that you use a mix to trehalose and DMSO, that they are flash frozen in liquid nitrogen in microcapillaries (or the same cassette you use here for large scale freezing of C. Hominis), and stored in liquid phase. I don't think the precendent of this work is stated enough. It is important to demonstrate where the starting point was for C. Parvum and how that was used as a guide for the experiments detailed here. Currently this manuscript feels as if this method was invented de novo with little comparison to the c. Parvum method.

Also while it is a huge breakthrough to be able to cryopreserve C. Hominis, I think the authors overlook the challenges of this method. It requires liquid phase liquid nitrogen, access to the cassettes, large number of organisms, and training to be able to carry out this technique. I think it will be helpful to cryopreserve important strains, but will not solve all the current problems suggested in the text. For example, only those who can use the current animal model will be able to invest in this new method. I think a statement about the limitations of this approach should be included.

It seems that cryopreservation in microcapillaries will have more board appeal for individual Labotories to implement (doesn't require the cassettes and requires lower numbers of organisms). I think this method should be better highlighted in the manuscript. There will be several labs collecting specimens of C. hominis, and it would be much more feasible for them to cryopreserve their samples in smaller volumes.

Reviewer #3: There are many technical bottlenecks in research on cryptosporidiosis that is important in human and animal health, including the maintenance of Cryptosporidium species and isolates in the laboratory. Preservation of Cryptosporidium isolates in laboratory is a big burden as conventional cryopreservation protocols do not work. Among the two most common species used in research (C. parvum and C. hominis), C. parvum are usually propagated in calves both for materials and for keeping the isolates, or in knockout mice, whereas only one isolate of C. hominis could be maintained by multiple annual passages in gnotobiotic piglets at Tuft Univ. The procedures are not only expensive but requiring specific facilities. The problem become more of the issue in a laboratory that maintains multiple isolates including transgenic ones. Therefore, any progress in cryopreservation of Cryptosporidium oocysts is a significant progress in the field, including the progress described in this manuscript.

More specifically, while vitrification-based cryopreservation of C. parvum oocysts was reported several years ago (also from the same lab), that protocol is not applicable to C. hominis for which only one isolate (also serving as the reference strain) in the world is maintained exclusively in one laboratory. The authors renovated the C. parvum vitrification protocol and redesigned the cryo-container, making it possible to cryopreserve C. hominis oocysts for long-term maintenance of the parasite. Again, this is a significant progress in the field. It may also be applied to preserve oocysts newly isolated from the field before an appropriate propagation method is available.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: No Major issues

Reviewer #2: No experiments, but comments above should be addressed.

Reviewer #3: None.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: 1) Does the same approach work for Cryptosporidium parvum? If the authors have data validating this method with C parvum, it should be included in the supplement, along with any needed protocol modifications. I believe the potential importance of the method is greatest for simpler preservation of the growing number of transgenic C parvum strains than for single-lot production of C hominis that still can't be amplified by recipient labs.

2) I strongly disagree with the word "crucial" in line 330 regarding use of C hominis for clinical challenge trials. "Preferable" would be more accurate. Assuming comparable in vitro susceptibility of C hominis and C parvum, which should be measured for both species (ideally multiple isolates of both species), outcomes in an animal or a person will be dependent on drug exposure at the relevant site and not affected by the species. Studies to determine if the tissue distributions of C hominis and C parvum in people are the same or different may be warranted, but there is currently no reason to believe that outcomes in people would be affected by the species.

3) The data show clearly that cryopreserved Tu502 C hominis can be recovered by infecting piglets, but with a delay in the onset of shedding, so there is obviously a genetic bottleneck with freezing that may have important implications regarding the utility of the recovered parasites, with perhaps an exaggerated impact for older oocysts. The 16S sequencing in Fig S3 does little to address this. It is possible, for example, that a subset of the Tu502 parent strain has genetic or epigenetic features that enhance survival. This is worthy of mention in the discussion. Future studies to examine differences in the input and recovered populations might be very interesting, such as by whole genome sequencing to identify SNPs correlated with survival. Similarly, it would be very interesting to know if you progressively select for greater survival with sequential rounds of cryopreservation and recovery. Of course, such changes might be correlated with heartiness in other ways. This seems an issue worthy of discussion, as a limitation of the current method and also as a potential route for further investigation.

4) Line 44: Based on the reanalysis of GEMS data, it's no longer accurate to state cryptosporidiosis ranks 2nd amongst pathogens that cause life-threatening diarrhea. This should be corrected, and the GEMS reanalysis should be cited.

Reviewer #2: Abstract- the species used to achieve infection rate of 100% should be specified. Is this in vivo? In vitro? Which model? I think it is important to qualify this in the abstract.

Abstract- the abstract does not mention how the method is 'scalable'. I think this should be addressed in the abstract, or if it is not a significant part of the method it should be removed from the title.

Introduction line 64- Location should be added

line 68 should not be included. This manuscript is about the method of cryopresevation, not about the value of this specific isolate.

Last few sentences of the introduction are too brief. If you wan to summarise the results here, we need more detail (temperature? What is the composition of CPA?, etc).

Line 90- CPA should be spelled out, rather than abbreviated in the subsection title.

The only cryoprotective agent (CPA) used here is trehalose. The author should make this clear early on that they are only exploring trehalose. Or they should directly refer to trehalose in the text. By using the phrase CPA, it seems like several agents are being tested, while actually only trehalose is described in the manuscript.

Line. 131 and line 257- no evidence for this has been presented, so these comments should be removed.

In detailed protocol, final note detailing overall efficiency of freezing should be moved to the beginning of the protocol. This information is key to understanding how much material can be harvested from freezing, so should be highlighted accordingly.

Each results section could benefit from having multiple paragraphs to break up ideas.

How do you store the cassettes in the liquid nitrogen tank? This should be addressed.

Reviewer #3: The manuscript is also well-written. I have no major concerns, but a few minor ones for the authors to consider during the revision.

1. Is this newly developed protocol for C. hominis also applicable to cryopreservation of C. parvum oocysts? Could the authors give some discussion to compare this C. hominis protocol and the previous C. parvum protocol (some parameters and procedures)?

2. Lines 130 – 131 (bile salt): Please specify which one of the bile salts was used. The figure also lacks info on the bile salt.

3. Lines 225 – 228 (oocysts inoculated to piglets): Please briefly specify the number and batch info for convenience to the reader. Some other places in the Results section might also include brief M&M info, so readers do not have to frequently switch between Results and M&M sections.

4. Lines 228 – 236 (Negative in fecal examination but positive in histology of ileal sections): The investigators monitored oocyst shedding by microscopic examination of fecal smears (acid-fast stained), which might be less sensitive for low number of oocysts. PCR or qPCR might be more sensitive (not a requirement for new experiment, but worth trying if fecal samples are still available).

5. References: Most species names are not in italic fonts.

6. Fig. 4: Add unit (mm) to the diagram. Also specify that there are two sets of loading and exit ports (?). In panel (c), specify DMSO concentrations associated with the three forms (ice, ice/glass and glass). These figure annotation suggestions are mostly for easy reading and understanding, and applicable to some other figures.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Guan Zhu

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Decision Letter 1

P'ng Loke, Boris Striepen

15 May 2023

Dear Dr. Sandlin,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Scalable cryopreservation of infectious Cryptosporidium hominis oocysts by vitrification.' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Boris Striepen

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

P'ng Loke

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

P'ng Loke, Boris Striepen

5 Jun 2023

Dear Dr. Sandlin,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Scalable cryopreservation of infectious Cryptosporidium hominis oocysts by vitrification.," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Summary of C. hominis infectivity in gnotobiotic piglet after cryopreservation using microcapillary method.

    (PDF)

    S1 Fig. Chemical permeabilization of C. hominis results in variable cryoprotective agent uptake.

    (PDF)

    S2 Fig. C. hominis oocysts vitrified in microcapillaries are infectious to gnotobiotic piglets (untransformed individual data plot).

    (PDF)

    S3 Fig. Alignment of 18s rRNA gene from C. hominis oocysts before and after cryopreservation in microcapillaries.

    (PDF)

    S4 Fig. High aspect ratio cassette design.

    (PDF)

    S5 Fig. Strategy for cassette loading and unloading.

    (PDF)

    S6 Fig. Recovery of oocyst sample from cassette.

    (PDF)

    S7 Fig. C. hominis oocysts aged < 10 weeks vitrified in cassettes are infectious to gnotobiotic piglets (untransformed individual data plot).

    (PDF)

    S8 Fig. Reduction in infectivity of C. hominis aged > 12 weeks cryopreserved in cassettes using 37°C permeabilization protocol.

    (PDF)

    S9 Fig. Infectivity of C. hominis cryopreserved in cassettes using 30°C permeabilization protocol.

    (PDF)

    S10 Fig. Cryopreservation protocol is sensitive to variation in room temperature.

    (PDF)

    S11 Fig. Comparison of the cryoprotective protocol between C. hominis and C. parvum oocysts.

    (PDF)

    S1 Protocol. Rapid cooling of C. hominis oocysts using high aspect ratio cassettes.

    (PDF)

    S1 Data. Supporting Information Data files.

    (ZIP)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Supporting Information Data files.


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES