Skip to main content
Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery logoLink to Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
. 2023 Jun 12;36(6):ivad095. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad095

Modified Ravitch procedure for pectus excavatum in Marfan syndrome with annuloaortic ectasia

Takahiro Iida 1,, Kazuhiro Nagayama 2, Kentaro Kitano 3, Haruo Yamauchi 4, Minoru Ono 5, Jun Nakajima 6
PMCID: PMC10284686  PMID: 37307071

Abstract

graphic file with name ivad095f3.jpg

OBJECTIVES

This case series aimed to determine the feasibility of simultaneous modified Ravitch and David procedures for Marfan syndrome patients with pectus excavatum and annuloaortic ectasia.

METHODS

Between March 2014 and December 2019, 7 consecutive patients underwent simultaneous surgery of modified Ravitch and David procedures for pectus excavatum and annuloaortic ectasia. The completion of cardiac surgery and sternal closure were followed by the modified Ravitch procedure. The bilateral fourth to seventh costal cartilages were resected, the sternal body partially wedge resected and the sternum raised anteriorly with re-suture. An oblique incision was performed on bilateral third costal cartilages, and they were fixed on top of each other, with the medial end superior and the lateral end inferior. The sternum was raised anteriorly, bypassing the fourth to seventh rib ends through the back of the sternum with threads. The feasibility and safety of the procedure were assessed through a retrospective review of the patients’ clinical charts.

RESULTS

The total sample had a median age of 28 years and comprised 5 males and 2 females. There was a significant difference in the preoperative and postoperative median Haller index, which were 6.8 and 3.9, respectively. All patients were discharged without serious complications, and there was no significant recurrence of pectus excavatum at 35–92 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our case series suggest the feasibility of one-stage surgery for pectus excavatum combined with cardiac surgery using the modified Ravitch procedure. Future efforts should be tailored for more uneventful postoperative clinical courses.

Keywords: Annuloaortic ectasia, Marfan syndrome, Modified Ravitch, Pectus excavatum


Pectus excavatum is one of the most common deformities of the chest wall.

INTRODUCTION

Pectus excavatum is one of the most common deformities of the chest wall. Pectus excavatum can cause scoliosis, heart displacement and lung volume reduction, leading to chest pain, fatigue, dyspnoea on exertion, respiratory infections and cardiac abnormalities [1]. Thus, various treatment methods for this disease have been reported in the past.

In Marfan syndrome, chest wall deformities such as pectus excavatum can be accompanied by heart disease. Pectus excavatum obstructs the surgical field because of abnormal deviation and rotation of the mediastinum. One- or two-stage repair of pectus excavatum and cardiovascular diseases has been reported in the literature [2–5].

In this case series, we report our experience concerning sternal elevation by simultaneous modified Ravitch procedure and David procedure for pectus excavatum and annuloaortic ectasia associated with Marfan syndrome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ethics statement

For this retrospective study, informed consent was obtained in the form of an opt-out clause on our hospital’s website (https://cts.m.u-tokyo.ac.jp/thoracic-surgery/clinical_study/). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Tokyo Hospital (approval no. 2406).

Study design and patients

We retrospectively collected and analysed data on patients who underwent simultaneous modified Ravitch procedure and David procedure for pectus excavatum and annuloaortic ectasia associated with Marfan syndrome and Loeys–Dietz syndrome in our department between March 2014 and December 2019.

Patient characteristics, perioperative factors and discharge status were collected from medical records. Patient characteristics included age, sex, height, weight, body mass index and comorbidities. Perioperative factors included surgical procedure (with or without resection of costal cartilage, refixation of ribs and wedge resection of the sternal body), operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay and complications. The treatment plan was discussed for each case at a joint preoperative conference of the Departments of Cardiac Surgery and Thoracic Surgery.

All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scans preoperatively and at least 1 month after the surgery. Preoperative and postoperative Haller indexes were calculated. The Haller index is defined as the ratio of the transverse diameter (the horizontal distance of the inside of the rib cage) and the anteroposterior diameter (the shortest distance between the frontal side of the vertebrae and the posterior surface of the sternum) at the deepest part of the pectus excavatum deformities on CT [6].

Preoperative and postoperative lung volumes were measured using a 3D image analysis system volume analyser (Synapse VincentⓇ, Fuji-Film, Tokyo, Japan) in each patient. Changes in lung volumes before and after repair of the pectus excavatum by modified Ravitch procedure were evaluated using 3DCT.

Transthoracic echocardiography was performed preoperatively and postoperatively in each patient to evaluate cardiac function before and after surgery by measuring left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Surgical procedure

Figure 1 summarizes the schema of our modified Ravitch procedure. Surgery was initiated with a median sternotomy, and the David procedure for annuloaortic ectasia was performed by the cardiovascular surgeon. The completion of cardiac surgery and sternal closure were followed by the modified Ravitch procedure. The bilateral 4th–7th costal cartilages were resected, including costal arches, and the sternal body was partially wedge resected laterally at the level of the second intercostal space. The sternum was then re-sutured so that the lower sternal body part was formed to face anteriorly. An oblique incision was placed on the bilateral third ribs, and the third costal cartilage was fixed on top of each other with the medial end superior and the lateral end inferior. After detaching the back of the sternum to avoid damaging the pleura, suture threads were placed on both sides of the cut ends of the 4th to 7th ribs or rib cartilage and were bridged with forceps and tied together. The sternum was raised anteriorly, bypassing the 4th–7th rib ends through the back of the sternum with threads.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Schema of the modified Ravitch procedure. The surgery was initiated by the cardiovascular surgeon with a median sternotomy, and after cardiac surgery and sternal closure, a modified Ravitch procedure was performed. The bilateral 4th–7th costal cartilages were resected, including costal arches, and the sternal body was transversely wedge resected and bent over to the ventral side. The third costal cartilage was sliced diagonally and medial side was overlaid on top. The sternum was lifted anteriorly and the ends of the 4th–7th ribs were bypassed through the back of the sternum using strings.

Ravitch’s original procedure was to free the depressed sternum from the surrounding tissue, bending it anteriorly by wedge resection of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the sternum, and elevating it by overlapping the second rib cartilages on each side through an oblique incision. In our technique, only the anterior surface of the sternum was wedge resected, and the bilateral 4th–7th costal cartilages were resected up to the costal arch. The bilateral third rib cartilages were superimposed through an oblique incision, and the bilateral 4th–7th rib segments were bridged at the back of the sternum with non-absorbable polyester braided sutures to allow support of the caudal sternum.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics are summarized as medians [interquartile ranges (IQRs)] for continuous data and counts (percentages) for categorical variables. Variables were compared and analysed using paired t-test. P-values <0.05 indicated statistical significance. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, version 4.2.0) [7].

RESULTS

From March 2014 to December 2019, 7 patients underwent simultaneous modified Ravitch procedure and David procedure for pectus excavatum and annuloaortic ectasia associated with Marfan syndrome. The main characteristics of these 7 patients are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 28 years (IQR 25–31 years). There were 5 males and 2 females. The median body mass index was 19.7 kg/m2 (IQR 15.5–22.8 kg/m2), based on the World Health Organization classification, with the males categorized as underweight to normal range, and the females as pre-obese.

Table 1:

Characteristic features of the patients (n = 7) in the case series

Case Age Sex Height Weight Comorbidity
1 29 M 187 72 MS, AAE
2 24 M 182 48 MS, AAE, MR
3 32 M 186 46 MS, AAE, MR
4 17 M 164 53 LDS, AAE
5 66 F 160 64 MS, AAE, DM, HT
6 28 F 160 66 MS, AAE
7 25 M 191 60 MS, AAE, TR
Median 28 182 60
IQR 25–31 162–187 51–65

AAE: annuloaortic ectasia; DM: diabetes mellitus; HT: hypertension; IQR: interquartile range; LDS: Loeys–Dietz syndrome; MS: Marfan syndrome; MR: mitral regurgitation; TR: tricuspid regurgitation.

The details of the surgeries and the postoperative course of the patients are shown in Table 2. Costal cartilage resection was performed in all cases, refixation of ribs was performed in 4 cases, wedge resection of the sternal body was performed in 4 cases and sternal elevation with suture threads was performed in 6 cases. Non-absorbable sutures were used in all cases. Thick sutures ranging from size 3 to finer sutures to 2–0 were selected depending in the case.

Table 2:

Details of the surgeries and postoperative course for the patients (n = 7) in the case series

Case Resection of costal cartilage Refixation of ribs Wedge resection of the sternal body Sternum elevation Suture thread Operation time (min) Thoracic Surgery (min) Blood loss (ml) LOS (days) Complication Recurrence Follow-up (month)
1 О О О О NA 713 104 1335 39 AF 92
2 О О О О NA 591 146 410 19 91
3 О О О О NA 805 214 1270 20 AF 84
4 О О О NA 534 152 210 14 + 60
5 О О NA 625 185 780 53 Brachial plexopathy 39
6 О О NA 462 110 450 22 Atelectasis 37
7 О О NA 519 73 810 12 SSI 35
Median 591 146 780 20 60
IQR 530–669 128–169 128–169 17–31 38–88

AF: atrial fibrillation; IQR: interquartile range; LOS: length of hospital stay; NA: non-absorbable suture; SSI: surgical site infection.

In 2 cases, due to the extremely narrow chest cavity, costal cartilage resection was performed before the median sternotomy to obtain an adequate operative field and mobility of the inferior end of the sternum and attached medial costal fragments. This manoeuvre also eliminated the risk of cardiac compression by opening the chest.

The median operative time was 591 min (IQR 530–669 min), including the David procedure; the median blood loss was 780 ml (IQR 430–1040 ml); and the median hospital stay was 20 days (IQR 17–31 days). There was no mortality recorded.

Complications were observed in 5 patients. Cases 1 and 3 required electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. Case 5 showed postoperative brachial palsy, but the patient's symptoms tended to improve conservatively. Case 6 had postoperative respiratory failure due to atelectasis, which improved with the use of a non-invasive ventilator. Case 7 developed a postoperative infection of the median sternotomy wound that healed with negative pressure wound therapy.

Figure 2 shows pre- and postoperative CT images and the morphology of the chest wall. All patients were discharged from the hospital. There were no significant recurrences of pectus excavatum at 35–92 months postoperatively, but case 4 presented with a mild recurrence of pectus excavatum that did not require reoperation and is currently under observation. There was a significant difference between the median Haller index, at 6.8 (IQR 5.8–13.7) preoperatively and 3.9 (IQR 3.5–4.2) postoperatively (P < 0.05).

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Computed tomography and picture (A) before and (B) after the surgical procedure. The morphology of the chest wall improved both visually and on computed tomography images before and after the surgery.

Changes in lung volumes were measured in 6 cases. Case 4 was excluded because lung volumes could not be measured from CT due to inappropriate imaging conditions. CT scans were performed preoperatively, within 6 months and after 1 year postoperatively (only that of case 7 was performed 1 month postoperatively). The median preoperative lung capacity was 3705 ml (IQR 2395–4576 ml) and the median postoperative lung capacity was 3805 ml (IQR 2516–4161 ml). Contrary to expectations, postoperative lung volumes decreased in 4 patients and increased in 2 patients, but overall, they did not change significantly (P = 0.69).

Changes in LVEF were measured in all patients. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed within 1 year pre- and postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the median LVEF, at 64% (IQR 60–69%) preoperatively and 66% (IQR 63–66%) postoperatively (P = 0.44).

DISCUSSION

The first technique of pectus excavatum repair was proposed by Ravitch in 1949; it was an open surgery that required partial resection of the cartilage, xiphoid excision and osteotomy of the sternum [8]. Multiple modifications to this procedure were proposed, such as the placement of a metal strut to support the sternum that would be removed after 6 months to a year. In 1998, Nuss proposed a minimally invasive technique, which uses a lateral chest wall incision, and is the most widely used surgical technique for pectus excavatum in the world today [9, 10]; however, its application in adult patients is controversial [11]. Taci et al. suggested that postoperative complications and recurrence rates were not statistically different between the Nuss and Ravitch procedures [12].

Several problems should be addressed in cardiac surgery associated with pectus excavatum. It is sometimes difficult to obtain an adequate operative field through routine median sternotomy because of severe posterior concavity of the sternum, which leads to the deviation of the heart and great vessels to the left hemithorax. The main issue in such cases is how to approach and repair both the pectus excavatum and any cardiac displacement into the left thoracic cavity. There have been various reports of cardiac surgery associated with pectus excavatum, including one- and two-stage surgeries. Considering the cardiac compartment syndrome due to compression from the depressed sternum after open-heart surgery, it is desirable to perform the surgery as 1 stage as possible.

It has also been reported that there is a high incidence of non-valvular arterial fibrillation associated with pectus excavatum. Furthermore, the incidence of arterial fibrillation associated with severe pectus excavatum is 5-fold higher than in patients without pectus excavatum [13]. Some reports discourage simultaneous repair of both lesions because of the potential for major complications, such as limited exposure of the heart, excessive bleeding and increased risk of wound infection [14]. However, other studies have reported successful one-stage corrections of both lesions without any complications [4, 5]. We have also successfully corrected both lesions simultaneously in a case that required median sternotomy.

The first technique of pectus excavatum repair described by Ravitch dissected the sternum and affected ribs [8]. Multiple modifications required long-term ventilator or metallic bar support of the sternum. Javangula et al. [15] reported the use of a ‘sternal bed’ with 2 wide strips of a Gortex patch as an alternative to a metallic bar. Kawamura et al. [5] reported an open door approach by partial sternotomy and sterno-costo-chondroplasty to divide and refix the right and left ribs, which was advantageous in partially dividing the sternum so the right ribs can be opened like a door to expose the deviated mediastinum. In the present case series, there was a case in which an oblique incision was difficult because the rib cartilage was fragile due to the replacement of bony tissue by age, so several options for sternal elevation should be prepared.

Despite the preferential use of the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum due to its minimal invasiveness, the Ravitch procedure in a median sternotomy approach performed simultaneously with cardiac surgery should still be considered. We used the modified Ravitch procedure of costal cartilage resection, rib refixation, wedge resection of the sternal body or sternal elevation by suture thread, depending on the case. Kanagaratnam et al. [16] demonstrated that the Nuss method was reported to cause more pain, especially in adult patients, but this could not be validated due to a lack of self-reported data and data on analgesic duration. In cases of pectus excavatum where a median sternotomy is used in cardiac surgery, it seems logical to choose the modified Ravitch procedure over the Nuss technique, which may cause increased pain, and the same is true from an aesthetic standpoint.

Pulmonary function was one of the most promising outcomes of the modified Ravitch procedure for the treatment of pectus excavatum. Sakamoto et al. [17] demonstrated little or no improvement in pulmonary function in adolescent patients postoperatively. They concluded that the lung capacity does not change postoperatively because the thoracic spine protrudes forward as much as the sternum protrudes forward. In fact, in our present study, there was no improvement in pulmonary function after the modified Ravitch procedure in adults.

A correlation between the Haller index and cardiac function (LVEF and RVEF) has been demonstrated in adolescents around 15 years of age [18]. Moreover, improvement in cardiac function in the early postoperative period has been reported to be sustained at follow-up [19], but this is not clear in adults, as was not shown in the present study.

Limitations

This study had some notable limitations. It was a retrospective, observational and single-institution study with a small number of cases. It was only exploratory in nature and can only provide an indication of the outcomes of the simultaneous procedure. It only included pectus excavatum patients with annuloaortic ectasia associated with Marfan syndrome and Loeys–Dietz syndrome; therefore, the results can only be applied to patients with cardiac disease.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, while functional improvement is not satisfied, the results of our case series suggest the feasibility of one-stage surgery for pectus excavatum combined with cardiac surgery using the modified Ravitch procedure. It is acceptable in terms of complications and recurrence, but a further accumulation of cases is needed to reduce complications.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Glossary

ABBREVIATIONS

CT

Computed tomography

IQRs

Interquartile ranges

LVEF

Left ventricular ejection fraction

Contributor Information

Takahiro Iida, Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Kazuhiro Nagayama, Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Kentaro Kitano, Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Haruo Yamauchi, Department of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Minoru Ono, Department of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Jun Nakajima, Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The data underlying this study will be shared on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Author contributions

Takahiro Iida: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Visualization; Writing—original draft. Kazuhiro Nagayama: Writing—review & editing; performance of modified Ravitch procedure. Kentaro Kitano: Writing—review & editing. Haruo Yamauchi: Performance of David procedure. Minoru Ono: Performance of David procedure. Jun Nakajima: Writing—review & editing; performance of modified Ravitch procedure.

Reviewer information

Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery thanks Thomas F. Molnar, Andrea Zuin and the other, anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review process of this article.

The presentation was given at the 73rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery (Japan, Nagoya, October 29th to November 1st, 2020, On-Demand).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Brochhausen C, Turial S, Müller FK, Schmitt VH, Coerdt W, Wihlm JM. et al. Pectus excavatum history, hypotheses and treatment options. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2012;14:801–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Fukunaga N, Yuzaki M, Hamakawa H, Nasu M, Takahashi Y, Okada Y.. Aortic valve-sparing operation after correction heart displacement due to pectus excavatum using Nuss procedure in a marfan syndrome patient. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;18:475–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Grapow MT, Campelos P, Barriuso C, Mulet J.. Eyes wide shut – unusual two stage repair of pectus excavatum and annuloaortic ectasia in a 37 year old marfan patient: case report. J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;6:64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ryu YG, Baek MJ, Kim HK, Choi YH, Sohn YS, Kim HJ.. Simultaneous repair for aortic incompetence with annuloaortic ectasia and pectus excavatum by modified Ravitch procedure with pectus bars in an adult patient with Marfan syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:e34-6–e36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kawamura T, Fukuda I, Minakawa M, Fukui K.. Open door approach by partial sternotomy and sterno-costo-chondroplasty for annuloaortic ectasia with pectus excavatum. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2011;12:645–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Haller JA, Kramer SS, Lietman SA.. Use of CT scans in selection of patients for pectus excavatum surgery: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 1987;22:904–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013;48:452–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ravitch MM. The operative treatment of pectus excavatum. Ann Surg 1949;129:429–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Nagasao T, Miyamoto J, Ichihara K, Jiang H, Jin H, Tamaki T.. Age-related change of postoperative pain location after Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;38:203–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Nuss D, Obermeyer RJ, Kelly RE.. Nuss bar procedure: past, present and future. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2016;5:422–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ashfaq A, Beamer S, Ewais MM, Lackey J, Jaroszewski D.. Revision of failed prior Nuss in adult patients with pectus excavatum. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;105:371–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Toci GR, Davis TA, Bigelow BF, Yang SC.. Analyzing outcomes of Nuss and Ravitch repair for primary and recurrent pectus excavatum in adults. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;110:272–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tran NT, Larry Klein J, Paul Mounsey J, Chung EH, Schwartz JD, Pursell I. et al. Lone atrial fibrillation is associated with pectus excavatum. Heart Rhythm 2013;10:1263–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Shamberger RC, Welch KJ, Castaneda AR, Keane JF, Fyler DC.. Anterior chest wall deformities and congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;96:427–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Javangula KC, Batchelor TJ, Jaber O, Watterson KG, Papagiannopoulos K.. Combined severe pectus excavatum correction and aortic root replacement in Marfan’s syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1913–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kanagaratnam A, Phan S, Tchantchaleishvili V, Phan K.. Ravitch versus Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2016;5:409–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sakamoto Y, Yokoyama Y, Nagasao T, Yamada Y, Yamada M, Jinzaki M. et al. Outcomes of the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum in adults. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021;74:2279–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zens TJ, Casar Berazaluce AM, Jenkins TM, Hardie W, Alsaied T, Tretter JT. et al. The severity of pectus excavatum defect is associated with impaired cardiopulmonary function. Ann Thorac Surg 2022;114:1015–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Jayaramakrishnan K, Wotton R, Bradley A, Naidu B.. Does repair of pectus excavatum improve cardiopulmonary function? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2013;16:865–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study will be shared on reasonable request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES