Summary
We investigated the influence of hydroxyl groups on the anti-quorum-sensing (anti-QS) and anti-biofilm activity of structurally similar cyclic dipeptides, namely cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr), and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe), against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe), lacking hydroxyl groups, displayed higher virulence factor inhibition and cytotoxicity, but showed less inhibitory ability in biofilm formation. Cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) and cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) suppressed genes in both the las and rhl systems, whereas cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) mainly downregulated rhlI and pqsR expression. These cyclic dipeptides interacted with the QS-related protein LasR, with similar binding efficiency to the autoinducer 3OC12-HSL, except for cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) which had lower affinity. In addition, the introduction of hydroxyl groups significantly improved the self-assembly ability of these peptides. Both cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) and cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) formed assembly particles at the highest tested concentration. The findings revealed the structure-function relationship of this kind of cyclic dipeptides and provided basis for our follow-up research in the design and modification of anti-QS compounds.
Subject areas: Biomolecules, Microbiology, Bacteriology
Graphical abstract

Highlights
-
•
Anti-QS activity of cyclo(Pro-Tyr)-like peptides were systemically assayed
-
•
How the OH group regulated the activity and cytotoxicity has been elucidated
-
•
Absence of OH group altered the acting pathway on QS system
-
•
Introduction of OH groups proved to significantly enhance self-assembly tendency
Biomolecules; Microbiology; Bacteriology
Introduction
Quorum sensing (QS) is a communication system that relies on autoinducers (AIs) to regulate population behavior among bacteria.1 Once the concentration of AIs reaches a certain threshold, they will bind to the receptors and then activate or inhibit the transcription and expression of several target genes, thereby regulating the biological population of bacteria and bacterial pathogenicity,2 such as bioluminescence, biofilm formation, differentiation, extracellular polysaccharides production, motility, antibiotics production, and so on. Most antibiotics inhibit the synthesis of genetic material DNA/RNA or proteins involved in metabolic pathways in bacteria.3 However, bacteria can develop resistance to these mechanisms, leading to many antibiotics’ failure.4 In contrast, the quorum sensing inhibitors (QSIs) target the QS system and inhibit the pathogenic process of bacteria,5,6,7 which rarely affects the average growth of bacteria and dramatically reduces the probability of bacterial resistance. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report on the threat of antibiotic resistance, multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria pose a serious threat to public health, with some types of MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to almost all antibiotics, even carbapenems.8 P. aeruginosa is a common opportunistic human pathogen that can cause various healthcare-associated infections, including pneumonia, bloodstream infections, urinary tract infections, and surgical site infections, and is particularly deadly for patients with chronic lung disease.9,10,11,12,13 Numerous studies have shown that the expression of the pathogenic virulence factors of P. aeruginosa is regulated by its QS system,14,15,16 thus making P. aeruginosa a suitable model for studying QSIs against gram negative bacteria.
Cyclic dipeptides (CDPs) are widespread in nature and exhibit various biological activities. For instance, cyclo(His-Pro) was discovered as an endogenous compound in mammals’ brains, and shows potential as a treatment for neurodegenerative diseases17,18; cyclo(L-Phe-L-Pro) and cyclo(L-Phe-trans-4-OH-L-Pro), both extracted from Lactobacillus plantarum (MiLAB 393) isolated from grass silage, have been proved to be antifungal19; cyclo(L-Pro-D-Arg) isolated from the Bacillus cereus showed antibacterial and antitumor activity20; cyclo(L-Leu-L-Tyr) isolated from sponge-associated fungi Penicillium sp.21 and cyclo(L-Leu-L-Pro) from Bacillus amyoliquefaciens22 were reported to inhibit biofilm formation of Streptococcus epidermidis. Among the reported bio-active CDPs, cyclo(Pro-Phe), cyclo(Pro-Tyr), and their analogs had been identified as QS inhibitors from various microbial species. Chen and coworkers reported the isolation and identification of cyclo(Pro-Phe) from the fungus Rosellinia necatrix in 1960.23 José and co-workers found that P. aeruginosa can produce cyclo(L-Pro-L-Val), cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe), and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), regulated by its lasI QS system, thus promoting the plant growth.24 Abed and co-workers isolated cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) from Marinobacter sp. SK-3 of a hypersaline microbial mat with anti-QS activity inhibited QS-dependent production of violacein by Chromobacterium violaceum CV017, reduced QS-dependent luminescence of the reporter Escherichia coli pSB401 induced by 3-oxo-C6-HSL.25 In addition, the same cyclic dipeptide from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Q-426 inhibited the formation of biofilms.26 Our group reported the isolation of cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) from Sphingomonas sp. WG,27 and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) from Penicillium chrysogenum DXY-1.28 We explored the anti-QS activity of the cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) and its isomers, and found that altering the stereochemistry of this CDP reduced its biological activity. Apart from these two cyclic dipeptides, cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr), which contains hydroxyproline, also attracted our interest. Cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) has already been reported as a natural product isolated from some microorganisms,29 with less study about its bioactivity. Structurally, the backbone of these three cyclic dipeptides is very similar, differing in the presence or absence of hydroxyl group at position 4′ of the tyrosine residue or at position 4 of the proline residue (Figure 1A). Compared with the linear form, CDPs generally show better biological activity because of their higher stability, protease resistance, and conformational rigidity. On the other hand, CDPs containing aromatic amino acids have also been reported to self-assemble into different morphologies.30,31
Figure 1.
Chemical structure and biocompatibility of CDPs
(A) Chemical structures of CDPs.
(B) Growth curve of P. aeruginosa PAO1 treated with CDPs at concentrations of 1.8 mM and 10 mM, PBS was used as the blank control. Cytotoxicity of CDPs on (C) A549 cells and (D) NIH-3T3 cells. Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
In this work, we compared the anti-QS activity of three synthetic CDPs cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr), and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) against P. aeruginosa PAO1, including the inhibition of virulence factors, swarming motility, and biofilm formation, as well as the effect on the expression of QS-related genes. Then, the binding affinity of these cyclic dipeptides to QS receptor protein LasR was investigated by molecular docking and Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) assay. In addition, cyclic dipeptides which contain aromatic moieties have been discovered displaying self-assembly behavior.32,33,34,35,36 However, the proline-containing sequences were not always easily aggregated, because of their more rigid structure. A series of cyclo(Phe-Xaa) has been reported forming hydrogel in an aqueous solution, except cyclo(Phe-Pro).37 We also wondered whether the introduction of hydroxyl group could affect the assemble ability and then further impact the anti-QS activity.
Results and discussion
The antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity of CDPs
The three CDPs cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr), and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) were synthesized by GL Biochem (shanghai) Ltd and Anhui Guoping Pharmaceutical Co. Their structures and purity were confirmed by NMR and HPLC, and they were all purified using pre-HPLC before biological experiments.
To investigate the biocompatibility of CDPs to P. aeruginosa, the growth curve of PAO1 treated with these CDPs at concentrations of 1.8 mM, and 10 mM were investigated. As shown in Figure 1B, there was no significant difference in bacterial growth between the cyclic dipeptides treated samples and the blank control. The population of bacterial cells reached the logarithmic growth phase after about 4 h and reached the stable stage after 20 h. The results demonstrated that cyclic dipeptides had little influence on PAO1 growth at the experimental concentrations.
To further investigate the cytotoxicity of CDPs to mammalian cells. The cytotoxicity of cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr), and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) was evaluated on lung cancer A549 and mouse embryo NIH-3T3 using the MTT assay. At concentrations of less than 10 mM, all three cyclic dipeptides showed low toxicity to mammalian cells. At the same time, cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) had more toxicity to the cells than the other two cyclic dipeptides, which contain the hydroxyl group (Figures 1C and 1D).
The effect on virulence factors production of P. aeruginosa PAO1
The QS system in P. aeruginosa regulates the production of virulence factors such as pyocyanin, elastase, proteases, and pyoverdin, as well as biofilm formation.38,39 To verify the anti-QS activity of these three CDPs against PAO1, we measured the production of the above virulence factors.
Based on our previous results,28 we chose the experimental concentrations of 0.4 mM, 1.1 mM, and 1.8 mM. As shown in Figures 2A–2C, the production of typical virulence factors decreased after the treatment with these three CDPs in a dose-dependent manner. At a concentration of 1.8 mM, cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) decreased the pyocyanin production by 41%, and activities of proteases and elastase by 20% and 32%, respectively. For the treatment with cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr), which consists of an additional hydroxyl group compared with cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), the pyocyanin production decreased by 47%. In comparison, the activities of proteases and elastase were only inhibited by 5% and 8%. Cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe), which lacks hydroxyl group, showed the best inhibitory efficiency on all these three virulence factors. After being treated with it, the production of pyocyanin, and activities of proteases and elastase were inhibited by 73%, 77%, and 61%, respectively. The results indicated that presence of hydroxyl groups inversely correlates with activity. Another important hallmark of P. aeruginosa virulence is the ability to produce low-molecular-weight iron-chelating compounds called pyoverdin, which aid in bacterial growth and survival under iron-limiting conditions. Changes in pyoverdin amount could be determined via measuring fluorescence intensity changes. The fluorescence intensity of the peptide-treated bacterial supernatant decreased in a dose-dependent manner at the experimental concentrations (Figures 2D–2F).
Figure 2.
Anti-QS activities of CDPs against P. aeruginosa PAO1
Effect of cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) (A and D), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) (B and E), and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) (C and F) on the production of virulence factors of P. aeruginosa PAO1 at different concentrations. Swarming and swimming motility (G) of P. aeruginosa PAO1 under treatment with PBS, 1.8 mM cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr), and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe). Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). The statistical significance was determined by using a one-way ANOVA test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.005, ∗∗∗p < 0.0005 (versus control).
Many bacteria swim in liquid or swarm over solid surfaces by rotary flagella, wherein the inhibition of motility promotes biofilm formation.40 Then, the cyclic dipeptides were tested for their inhibition on the swarming and swimming of P. aeruginosa PAO1. As shown in Figure 2G, after being treated with 1.8 mM cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr), and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe), both the swarming and swimming motility migration diameters were smaller than that of the control group. All three cyclic dipeptides seemed to inhibit the bacterial motility of PAO1, with no significant differences in inhibitory efficiency.
The effects on biofilm formation
Bacterial biofilms are refuges for bacteria that significantly enhance their resistance to antibiotics and host immune defense mechanisms, leading to persistent and recurrent infections.41 The formation of dense biofilm is one of the leading causes of P. aeruginosa evolving drug resistance. The mechanism of biofilm formation is complex and is affected by many factors. It has been reported that in many bacteria, QS system can regulate bacterial biofilm formation.42,43 After being co-cultured with the three CDPs, the bacterial biofilm mass was measured using a crystal violet staining assay. As shown in Figure 3A, all the CDPs inhibited the biofilm formation at experimental concentrations in a dose-dependent manner. At the concentration of 1.8 mM, cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr), and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) inhibited biofilm formation by 52%, 50%, and 48%, respectively. Of interest, at the concentration of 1.1 mM, the difference in the biofilm inhibition ratio of these three cyclic dipeptides was more significant, in which cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) showed a weak inhibiting ability.
Figure 3.
Anti-biofilm activity of CDPs on PAO1
(A) Biofilm formation of PAO1 under treatment with cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr), and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) at different concentrations.
(B) SEM images of remaining PAO1 cells after treatment with cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr), and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) (1.8 mM). The intact short rods of PAO1 with clear inner and outer membranes are marked by yellow arrows.
(C–E) ATR-FTIR spectra of bacterial cells' contents. Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). PBS served as the blank control. The statistical significance was determined by using a one-way ANOVA test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.005, ∗∗∗p < 0.0005 (versus control).
To observe the effect of cyclic dipeptides on bacterial morphology, the morphology of bacteria and biofilms was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For the PAO1 that was untreated with any CDPs, a thick biofilm could be observed covering the intact rod-shaped bacterial cell. Although for the samples being treated with CDPs, the biofilm was destroyed, and the bacteria looked planktonic. Notably, the bacterial cells also showed normal morphology with clear and complete inner and outer membranes and thin and uniform periplasmic space entirely in the form of short rods, which indicated that these CDPs only inhibit the biofilm formation without damaging the bacterial cells.
To further investigate the reduction in bacterial biofilms, we performed ATR-FTIR analysis on changes in the bacterial cellular components after CDPs treatment.27,44 There are four major typical absorbance prominent regions representing different components of the biofilm (3700-3100 cm−1 corresponding to the hydration, 3050-2800 cm−1 to fatty acids, 1750-1500 cm−1 to amide linkages within proteins and peptides, 1500-1000 cm−1 to a mixed region of proteins, fatty acids and nucleic acids, respectively).45,46,47 As shown in Figures 3C–3E, compared with the control group, CDPs-treated PAO1 cells showed prominently declined absorbance in the four major regions, indicating that the carbohydrate, fatty acid, protein, and nucleic acids contents of the bacterium were reduced. Also, the bacterial-secreted cellular components were relatively reduced, leading to a decrease in bacterial adhesion. This indirectly indicated that the CDPs had some inhibitory activity on biofilm formation of PAO1.
The effects on QS-regulated genes of PAO1
It has been documented that three main pathways participated in P. aeruginosa QS system. The las and rhl systems mainly control the production of pyocyanin, the expression of elastase and proteases, and the maturation stage of biofilm formation; the pqs system is mainly involved in the early biofilm formation.16 RT-PCR was then employed to evaluate specifically to assess the impacts on the QS genes’ expression, investigating the possible anti-QS mechanism of these CDPs. As shown in Figure 4A, cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) and cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) exhibited similar regulating predictions of the test genes, and cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) showed a better down-regulating capacity of genes expression of las and rhl system, whereas these two CDPs displayed less effect on the pqs system. The cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe), which substitutes the hydroxyl group for hydrogen, mainly influenced the expression of rhlI, and had some effect on pqsR. The results indicated cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) and cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) could inhibit biofilm formation and reduce virulence factor production by affecting both las and rhl systems. In comparison, cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) acted mainly by targeting the rhl system.
Figure 4.
The effects of CDPs on PAO1 QS genes expression
The rpoD was used as an internal standard. PBS served as the control. Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.005, ∗∗∗p < 0.0005 (versus control).
Binding analysis for LasR and CDPs
To study the possible inhibitory mechanism of CDPs on the QS system of P. aeruginosa PAO1, molecular docking was performed to explore the interaction of the three cyclic dipeptides with the QS receptor LasR. Docking stimulation was performed using LasR (PDB: 2UV0) (Figure 5). The docking between natural ligand N-3-oxo-dodecanoyl homoserine lactone (3OC12-HSL) and LasR was regarded as a control, and the docking box was set containing the whole protein simultaneously. The docking result of 3OC12-HSL was highly consistent with the reported X-ray structures (Figure 5D)48,49 and previous study,50 demonstrating the construction of a reliable docking method. The docking data indicated that these three CDPs could bind with LasR in the same region as the ligand. All the binding energy of three cyclic dipeptides cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) (−7.99 kcal/mol), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) (−8.13 kcal/mol), cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) (−8.28 kcal/mol), were slightly higher than that of the natural ligand (−8.33 kcal/mol). The amino acids of LasR surrounding the small molecules which form hydrogen bonding were listed in Table 1.
Figure 5.
Molecular docking of CDPs to LasR
Docked conformation of cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) (A), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) (B), cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) (C), and natural ligand 3OC12-HSL (D) with LasR (2UV0) receptor proteins respectively. The hydrogen bonds formed were presented as yellow dashed lines.
Table 1.
Detailed docking information of LasR with different CDPs and autoinducer 3OC12-HSL
| Molecules | Binding energy (kcal/mol) | Hydrogen binding interactions |
|---|---|---|
| cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) | −8.28 | Arg61, Asp73, Thr75, Tyr93 |
| cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) | −8.13 | Arg61, Leu125, Ser129 |
| cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) | −7.99 | Trp60, Trp88, Ser129 |
| 3OC12-HSL | −8.33 | Trp60, Asp73, Thr75, Ser129 |
Next, the interaction of these three CDPs with LasR protein was further verified by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). LasR was expressed and purified without the natural ligand. As shown in Figure 6, the binding constant (Kd) of natural ligand 3OC12-HSL was 1.33 μM, which is consistent with previous reports.50,51 The binding number is about 1, suggesting that one protein monomer bind one ligand. The three cyclic dipeptides displayed the same binding stoichiometry with LasR. Cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) also showed micromolar-range binding affinities for LasR. However, the binding affinity of cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) for LasR was much lower, which was consistent with the docking results. Combining the anti-QS activity and gene expression analysis, and the interaction data, we hypothesized that there might be other targets that cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) acted in the QS system.
Figure 6.
Microcalorimetric binding studies of LasR with CDPs
(A–C) Titration of 8 μM LasR with 200 μM CDPs.
(D) Titration of 8 μM LasR with 200 μM 3OC12-HSL. The upper panel shows the raw titration data. The lower panel shows dilution-heat corrected and concentration-normalized integrated peak areas of the raw titration data. Data were fitted with the “Independent” model of the Launch ITC Run software.
Self-assembly assay
Intrinsic fluorescence spectrometry and conductivity were used to measure the critical aggregation concentrations (CACs) of these three cyclic dipeptides. There was no change in the shape of the fluorescence emission spectra at the tested concentrations for all samples. The maximum emission wavelengths of cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr), and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) were located at ∼302, 303, and 283 nm, respectively. As the concentration of CDPs solution gradually increased, the fluorescence intensity first increased and then weakened (Figure S8A), and the turning points indicated the occurrence of aggregating. The CAC values of cyclic dipeptides inferred from the fluorescence intensity or conductivity changes of the peaks (Figures S8 and S9) are listed in Table 2. It was obvious that the hydroxyl group rendered cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) and cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) more easily to aggregate. Subsequently, after incubation for 24 h, the morphology and size of the aggregates were measured by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) and Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS). As shown in Figure 7, cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) and cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) showed spherical morphology with a particle size of 50 nm and 100 nm, respectively. Cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) could not be detected obviously by AFM and the dimensions measured with DLS was extremely small, about 1∼2 nm. Apparently, the CAC values of cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) and cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) were both less than the maximum tested concentration (1.8 mM), indicating that these two cyclic dipeptides functioned as aggregates in the bioactivity assys. In the contrast, the CAC value of cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) was much higher than the maximum tested concentration, indicating that it acted as a QS inhibitor as a monomer.
Table 2.
Experimentally measured CACs of CDPs
| Molecules | CACs (mM) |
|
|---|---|---|
| fluorescence spectra | conductivity | |
| cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) | 5.4 | 4.1 |
Figure 7.
Self-assembly properties of CDPs
AFM images of CDPs (A), the height of the aggregates along the blue lines in the AFM images (B) and DLS (C) of cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr), and cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) at 1.8 mM.
It has been studied that, molecular self-assembly may affect its biological activity.52,53,54 Many cationic antimicrobial peptides always could self-assemble in aqueous solution, and thus increased their antimicrobial activity.55,56 The QS signals, acyl-homoserine lactones, were also proved to self-assemble into micelles and vesicles in aqueous solutions, and the aggregates were suggested could play roles in mediating these signals’ transportation between cells.57 We speculated that the differences in the anti-QS and anti-biofilm activities of these cyclic peptides could also be caused by molecular self-assembly.
Limitations of the study
Here, we demonstrate the influence of the hydroxyl group on the bioactivity and self-assembly of three synthetic structure-similar cyclic dipeptides. Although the genes expression result proved that cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) acted as a QSI in a different way from the other two hydroxyl-containing cyclic dipeptides, the reason for the difference is still needed to explore in the future study. Moreove, detailed understandings on the action mechanisms of cyclic dipeptides as QSIs are still needed in the future.
STAR★Methods
Key resources table
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Bacterial and virus strains | ||
| P. aeruginosa PAO1 | ATCC | ATCC 27853 |
| Experimentalmodels Cell lines | ||
| A549 | ATCC | CCL-185 |
| NIH-3T3 | ||
| Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
| PBS(PBS) | Sigma-Aldrich | P5493 |
| Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) | Damas life | P1872015 |
| RNAiso Plus | Takara | 108-95-2 |
| Pancreatin | Damas life | P1956729 |
| 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-Thiazolyl)-2,5-Diphenyl Tetrazolium Bromide (MTT) | Aladdin | 298-93-1 |
| Azocasein | Sigma-Aldrich | 102110-74-7 |
| Elastin-Congo red (ECR) | Bomei | AR |
| Tryptone | OXOID | |
| Yeast Extract | OXOID | |
| Crystal Violet | SINOPHARM | AR |
| Critical commercial assays | ||
| iScriptTM cDNA Synthesis kit | TaKaRa | 6210A |
| Corning-96 Cell culture plates | Corning | 3365 |
| Software and algorithms | ||
| Auto Dock Tools-1.5.6 | AutoDock Inc | http://mgltools.scripps.edu/ |
| using OriginPrio 9.1 software | OriginLab | https://www.originlab.com/ |
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Zhu. Hu (zhuhu@fjnu.edu.cn).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents.
Experimental model and subject details
Bacterial strain and culture conditions
P. aeruginosa PAO1 (ATCC 27853) strain was used to evaluate anti-QS activity. PAO1 was incubated in LB medium (tryptone 1% w/v, yeast extract 0.5% w/v, NaCl 1% w/v and agar 1% w/v) overnight at 37°C at 165 rpm.
Cell culture
Human lung epithelial cell line A549 (ATCC CCL-185) was a kind donation from Prof. Cuixia Chen of China University of Petroleum (East China). Mouse embryonic fibroblasts NIH-3T3 were donated by Dr. Hanping Fu from Fujian Normal University. A549 and NIH-3T3 cells were proliferated in F-12K or Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) with 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum at 37°C under 5% CO2.
Method details
Growth curve of P. aeruginosa PAO1
The growth curve of PAO1 was measured using a microplate reader (BioTek, SynergyTM LX, USA) under treatment with different CDPs (1.8 mM or 10 mM). Briefly, the overnight cultures of PAO1 were diluted with LB medium to OD600 = 0.05, then inoculated in 96-well plate with CDPs at 37°C. PBS was used as a negative control. The bacterial density was measured every 2 h up to 24 h at a wavelength of 600 nm.
Cytotoxicity activity
The MTT method was used to perform a cytotoxicity experiment.58 A549 or NIH-3T3 cells (3000 cells per well) were seeded into a 96-well plate and incubated at 37 for 24 h under 5% CO2 atmosphere. The cells were then treated without and with the CDPs in different concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 10 mM and cultured for 24 h under the same cultivating conditions. After 24 h, the culture-attached cells were washed twice with the medium. One hundred microlitre of 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-Thiazolyl)-2,5-Diphenyl Tetrazolium Bromide (MTT) dissolved in the medium at a 1 mg/mL concentration was added to every well and co-cultured with the cells for further 4 h. Culture was removed, and DMSO was added to dissolve the generated formazan. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 20 min on a shaker at 120 rpm, and the absorbance (OD570) was determined by a microplate reader. The cytotoxicity of the CDPs was evaluated using the relative viability of the cell, for which the blank control value was 100%. Every tested concentration was repeated independently three times.
QS-regulated virulence factors assay
The virulence factors were determined according to the previous method59 with a slight modification. PAO1 suspensions (OD600 = 0.05) were incubated with sub-MIC doses (0.4 mM, 1.1 mM, and 1.8 mM) of CDPs in each 10 mL conical flask at 37°C at 180 rpm for 12 h. After incubation, the culture media was centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 min to remove the cell precipitation.
Pyocyanin assay
The 5 mL supernatant was extracted with 3 mL CHCl3, and the organic layer was then extracted with 1 mL HCl (0.2 M). The upper water phase was collected via centrifugation, and the absorbance was measured at 520 nm. The effects of the compounds were evaluated using the relative pyocyanin production, for which the blank control value was 100%.
Proteolytic activity assay
The supernatant (100 μL) was reacted with 0.8% azocasein in a buffer (400 μL 50 mM K2HPO4, pH 7.0), and incubated at 30°C for 3 h. Afterward, 1.5 M HCl was added to the mixture and reacted on ice for 10 min. The solution was centrifugated at 12000 rpm for 10 min and the OD440 of the supernatant was determined. The effects of the compounds were evaluated using the relative production of degraded azocasein, for which the blank control value was 100%.
Elastase activity assay
The 100 μL supernatant was shaken at 37°C for 12 h with 5 mg Elastin-Congo red (ECR) and 400 μL Na2HPO4 (pH 7.2). After that, the reaction mixture was centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 min to obtain a clear supernatant, and the OD495 was determined. The effects of the compounds were evaluated using the relative production of degraded ECR, for which the blank control value was 100%.
Pyoverdin activity assay
Fluorescence intensity in the supernatant was measured using a fluorescence spectrophotometer at 405 nm excitation wavelength and 465 nm emission wavelength.
Swarming and swimming motility assay
P. aeruginosa PAO1 was investigated using the following media: (1) swarming plate (0.5% w/v tryptone, 0.2% w/v yeast extract, 1% w/v glucose, 0.5% w/v agar), (2) swimming plate (1% w/v tryptone, 0.5% w/v NaCl, 0.3% w/v agar). The agar media was cooled down for 10 min before use and different concentration CDPs were added. After solidification, a sterile filter paper with a diameter 2 mm was placed in the center with 2 μL overnight culture of PAO1 suspensions (1 × 107 CFU mL−1), and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The colony phenotype was observed and the colonies were imaged.
Biofilm assay
The effect of CDPs on biofilm formation was evaluated by the crystal violet staining method following bacterial growth for 24 h in culture-treated 96-well flat-bottom plates as previously described.60 Briefly, bacterial cell suspensions (OD600 = 0.05) were incubated at 37°C with or without CDPs to allow biofilm formation. This assay was repeated three times. After the culture microplates recorded the optical density of 600 nm to monitor microbial growth, the wells of the contents removed were washed three times with 250 μL of sterile phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution and stained with 200 μL crystal violet (0.1%) aqueous solution for 20 min. The excess stain was removed by washing with PBS and the plate was then dried at ambient temperature in air. A 200 μL ethanol (75%) was added to each well to redissolve the dye, and the biofilm was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 595 nm.
SEM
The visualization biofilms were observed under SEM to further confirm the effect of CDPs. Sterile cover glasses were placed in the bottom of 6- well plate, and then 2 mL P. aeruginosa PAO1 bacterial suspension (OD600 = 0.05) was cultivated at 37°C for 48 h. The coverslips were washed with PBS to remove the non-adherent cells, cultured in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 4 h, and continuously dehydrated for 10 min with gradient ethanol series (50–90%). Following that, gold was sputtered on the dry biofilm’s cover for scanning electron microscopy.
ATR-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic (FTIR) analysis
The bacterial suspension of P. aeruginosa PAO1 (OD600 = 0.05) was grown in a 6-well plate with or without an appropriate dose of CDPs, and the plate was subsequently cultured at 37°C for 2 days. The collected bacterial cells were freeze-dried after incubation. An ATR-FTIR spectrophotometer (Nicolet iS5, Thermo Scientific, USA) was used to test the ATR-FTIR spectra.
Expression of QS genes
Influence upon the expression levels of QS regulatory genes lasI, lasR, rhlI, rhlR, pqsA, and pqsR in P. aeruginosa PAO1 was determined by performing quantitative real-time PCR. P. aeruginosa PAO1 suspensions (OD600 = 0.05) were incubated with different concentrations of CDPs in 10 mL of LB liquid medium, before the RNA extraction was carried out according to the instructions of the RNAiso Plus (Total RNA extraction reagent) kit provided by TaKaRa Company. The total RNA was reverse recorded regarding the iScriptTM cDNA synthesis kit. Fluorescence qRT-PCR was performed with the iTaqTM Universal SYBR Green Supermix kit using a CFX96 Real-Time system. The following program was used for these genes: 95°C for 3 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s. The dissolution curve and amplification curve were observed. The experiment was repeated 3 times, the average value was taken, and the data were analyzed by relative quantitative 2−ΔΔCt method with rpoD ribosomal gene (an internal control). The sequence detail illustrated in Table S1.
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) assay
LasR expression and purification were performed as previously described.51 CDPs (200 μM) in the TSB buffer were titrated into LasR protein (8 μM) dissolved in the same buffer using a Nano ITC (TA, America) instrument at 25°C. The reference parameter was set to 22 injections (2 μL per injection) with a spacing of 200 s between each injection. Each experiment's first injection (0.4 μL) was discarded, and the collected data were analyzed with the Launch ITC Run software.
Critical aggregation concentration (CAC) measurements
In this experiment, the intrinsic fluorescence signal of cyclic dipeptides was used to determine its fluorescence spectrum and critical aggregation concentration (CAC). CDPs (4 mL) solutions with concentrations of 0.01 mM, 0.1 mM, 0.25 mM, 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 1.5 mM, 2 mM, 2.5 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM were made directly in aqueous solution. The above concentrations of cyclic dipeptide solutions were vortexed for 30 s to mix well, and the samples were worth to be tested after 12–24 h at room temperature and protected from light. The parameters of the fluorescence spectrum were set as follows: the excitation wavelength of cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr) was 274 nm, and the recorded wavelength range was 284–400 nm. The excitation wavelength of cyclo(L-Hyp-L-Tyr) was 274 nm, and the recorded wavelength range was 295–400 nm. The excitation wavelength of cyclo(L-Pro-L-Phe) was 257 nm, the recorded wavelength range was 270–350 nm. The final CAC values were calculated by plotting the fluorescence intensity at the maximum emission wavelength or conductivity as the vertical coordinate and logc as the horizontal coordinate.
Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)
AFM was used to examine the morphology of CDPs’ assemblies. CDPS solutions were configured at ambient temperature and dropped (10 μL) onto mica sheets and dried at room temperature. Observations were carried out on a Bruker MultiMode 8 high-resolution AFM, where the morphology was characterized in ScanAsyst tip measurement mode at an elastic constant of 0.4 N/m for the silicon probe and a resonance frequency of 70 kHz.
Dynamic Light Scattering
The particle size of the 1.8 mM CDPS aqueous solution was studied using Malvern Nano ZSE nanoparticles (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK) analyser. Test conditions: at a fixed scattering angle of 107° and a fixed temperature of 25°C, the scans were repeated three times with a cumulative total of 100 scans each. The data were processed by cumulative analysis of the experimental correlation function and the particle diameters were calculated from the calculated diffusion coefficients. Each reported measurement was performed three times.
Quantification and statistical analysis
We determined differences in data between groups by one-way ANOVA. Comparisons of means between multiple groups were assessed by a one-way ANOVA test. All statistical analyses were carried out using Origin software version 9.1. Details and types of statistical analyses can be found in the figure legends. In this study, the statistical significance was determined by using a one-way ANOVA test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.005, ∗∗∗p < 0.0005 (vs control).
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22007013 and U1805234), 100 Talents Program of Fujian Province, Program for Innovative Research Team in Science and Technology in Fujian Province University, Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2021J01153), Fujian-Taiwan Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering (2021D039), and the Scientific Research Start-up Fund for High-Level Talents in Fujian Normal University.
Author contributions
L.L. and Y.W. conceived the project. L.L. and Z.X. performed experiments and analyzed data. R.C. and J.L. performed supplementary experiments. C.W. advised the implementation of experiments. L.L., Y.W., and Z.X. wrote the manuscript. Y.W., H.Z., and C.W. reviewed the manuscript. Y.W. and H.Z. supervised the project.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Published: June 7, 2023
Footnotes
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107048.
Contributor Information
Yinglu Wang, Email: wangyl@fjnu.edu.cn.
Hu Zhu, Email: zhuhu@fjnu.edu.cn.
Supplemental information
Data and code availability
-
•
All data produced in this study are included in the published article and its supplemental information, or are available from the lead contact upon request.
-
•
This paper does not report original code.
-
•
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
References
- 1.Miller M.B., Bassler B.L. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2001;55:165–199. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Diggle S.P., Griffin A.S., Campbell G.S., West S.A. Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Nature. 2007;450:411–414. doi: 10.1038/nature06279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pulingam T., Parumasivam T., Gazzali A.M., Sulaiman A.M., Chee J.Y., Lakshmanan M., Chin C.F., Sudesh K. Antimicrobial resistance: prevalence, economic burden, mechanisms of resistance and strategies to overcome. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022;170:106103–106120. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tenover F.C. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria. Am. J. Infrct. Control. 2006;119:S3–S10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.05.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lu L., Li M., Yi G., Liao L., Cheng Q., Zhu J., Zhang B., Wang Y., Chen Y., Zeng M. Screening strategies for quorum sensing inhibitors in combating bacterial infections. J. Pharm. Anal. 2022;12:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2021.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Geske G.D., Wezeman R.J., Siegel A.P., Blackwell H.E. Small molecule inhibitors of bacterial quorum sensing and biofilm formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:12762–12763. doi: 10.1021/ja0530321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.O’ Loughlin C.T., Miller L.C., Siryaporn A., Drescher K., Semmelhack M.F., Bassler B.L. A quorum-sensing inhibitor blocks Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence and biofilm formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:17981–17986. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316981110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.CDC . U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC; 2019. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kalluf K.O., Arend L.N., Wuicik T.E., Pilonetto M., Tuon F.F. Molecular epidemiology of SPM-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa by rep-PCR in hospitals in Parana. Brazil. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017;49:130–133. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ramos G.P., Rocha J.L., Tuon F.F. Seasonal humidity may influence Pseudomonas aeruginosa hospital-acquired infection rates. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2013;17:e757–e761. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Van Delden C., Iglewski B.H. Cell-to-cell signaling and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1998;4:551–560. doi: 10.3201/eid0404.980405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tuon F.F., Dantas L.R., Suss P.H., Tasca Ribeiro V.S. Pathogenesis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm: a review. Pathogens. 2022;11:300–318. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11030300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lichtenberg M., Jakobsen T.H., Kuhl M., Kolpen M., Jensen P.O., Bjarnsholt T. The structure-function relationship of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in infections and its influence on the microenvironment. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2022;46:1–13. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuac018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Turkina M.V., Vikström E. Bacteria-host crosstalk: sensing of the quorum in the context of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. J. Innate Immun. 2019;11:263–279. doi: 10.1159/000494069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Duplantier M., Lohou E., Sonnet P. Quorum sensing inhibitors to quench P. aeruginosa pathogenicity. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14:1262–1296. doi: 10.3390/ph14121262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Guła G., Dorotkiewicz-Jach A., Korzekwa K., Valvano M.A., Drulis-Kawa Z. Complex signaling networks controlling dynamic molecular changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019;26:1979–1993. doi: 10.2174/0929867325666180912110151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Prasad C. Bioactive cyclic dipeptides. Peptides. 1995;16:151–164. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(94)00017-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bellezza I., Peirce M.J., Minelli A. Cyclic dipeptides: from bugs to brain. Trends Mol. Med. 2014;20:551–558. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ström K., Sjögren J., Broberg A., Schnürer J. Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB 393 produces the antifungal cyclic dipeptides cyclo(L-Phe-L-Pro) and cyclo(L-Phe-trans-4-OH-L-Pro) and 3-phenyllactic acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002;68:4322–4327. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.9.4322-4327.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kumar S.N., Mohandas C., Nambisan B., Sreerag R.S., Jayaprakas C.A. Cyclo(L-Pro-D-Arg): a new antibacterial and antitumour diketopiperazine from Bacillus cereus associated with a rhabditid entomopathogenic. Folia Microbiol. 2014;59:197–202. doi: 10.1007/s12223-013-0282-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Scopel M., Abraham W.R., Henriques A.T., Macedo A.J. Dipeptide cis-cyclo(Leucyl-Tyrosyl) produced by sponge associated Penicillium sp. F37 inhibits biofilm formation of the pathogenic Staphylococcus epidermidis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013;23:624–626. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gowrishankar S., Pandian S.K. Modulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis (RP62A) extracellular polymeric layer by marine cyclic dipeptide-cyclo(L-leucyl-L-prolyl) thwarts biofilm formation. BBA Biomembr. 2017;1859:1254–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.CHEN Y.S. Studies on the metabolic products of rosellinia necatrix berlese part I. Isolation and characterization of several physiologically active neutral substances. Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan. 1960;24:372–381. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ortiz-Castro R., Díaz-Pérez C., Martínez-Trujillo M., del Río R.E., Campos-García J., López-Bucio J. Transkingdom signaling based on bacterial cyclodipeptides with auxin activity in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:7253–7258. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006740108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Abed R.M.M., Dobretsov S., Al-Fori M., Gunasekera S.P., Sudesh K., Paul V.J. Quorum sensing inhibitory compounds from extremophilic microorganisms isolated from a hypersaline cyanobacterial mat. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013;40:759–772. doi: 10.1007/s10295-013-1276-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang J.H., Yang C.Y., Fang S.T., Lu J., Quan C.S. Inhibition of biofilm in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Q-426 by diketopiperazines. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016;32:143–151. doi: 10.1007/s11274-016-2106-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chang A., He Q., Li L., Yu X., Sun S., Zhu H. Exploring the quorum sensing inhibition of isolated chrysin from Penicillium chrysogenum DXY-1. Bioorg. Chem. 2021;111:104894–104902. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.104894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yu X., Li L., Sun S., Chang A., Dai X., Li H., Wang Y., Zhu H. A cyclic dipeptide from marine fungus Penicillium chrysogenum DXY-1 exhibits anti-quorum sensing activity. ACS Omega. 2021;6:7693–7700. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mitova M., Tommonaro G., Hentschel U., Müller W.E.G., De Rosa S. Exocellular cyclic dipeptides from a Ruegeria strain associated with cell cultures of Suberites domuncula. Mar. Biotechnol. 2004;6:95–103. doi: 10.1007/s10126-003-0018-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Manchineella S., Govindaraju T. Molecular self-assembly of cyclic dipeptide derivatives and their applications. Chempluschem. 2017;82:88–106. doi: 10.1002/cplu.201600450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Scarel M., Marchesan S. Diketopiperazine gels: new horizons from the self-assembly of cyclic dipeptides. Molecules. 2021;26:3376. doi: 10.3390/molecules26113376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jeziorna A., Stopczyk K., Skorupska E., Luberda-Durnas K., Oszajca M., Lasocha W., Górecki M., Frelek J., Potrzebowski M.J. Cyclic dipeptides as building units of Nano- and microdevices: synthesis, properties, and structural studies. Cryst. Growth Des. 2015;15:5138–5148. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tao K., Fan Z., Sun L., Makam P., Tian Z., Ruegsegger M., Shaham-Niv S., Hansford D., Aizen R., Pan Z., et al. Quantum confined peptide assemblies with tunable visible to near-infrared spectral range. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3217–3227. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05568-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Park S.O., Jeong H., Park J., Bae J., Choi S., Shinhyun C. Experimental demonstration of highly reliable dynamic memristor for artificial neuron and neuromorphic computing. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:2888. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30539-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sloand J.N., Miller M.A., Medina S.H. Cyclic dipeptides: biological activities and self-assembled materials. Pept. Sci. 2021;113 [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang M., Yuan C., Shen G., Chang R., Xing R., Yan X. Cyclic dipeptide nanoribbons formed by dye-mediated hydrophobic self-assembly for cancer chemotherapy. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;557:458–464. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.09.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kleinsmann A.J., Nachtsheim B.J. Phenylalanine-containing cyclic dipeptides-the lowest molecular weight hydrogelators based on unmodified proteinogenic amino acids. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:7818–7820. doi: 10.1039/c3cc44110e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chadha J., Harjai K., Chhibber S. Revisiting the virulence hallmarks of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a chronicle through the perspective of quorum sensing. Environ. Microbiol. 2022;24:2630–2656. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lee J., Zhang L. The hierarchy quorum sensing network in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Protein Cell. 2015;6:26–41. doi: 10.1007/s13238-014-0100-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Guttenplan S.B., Kearns D.B. Regulation of flagellar motility during biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013;37:849–871. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liu S., Lu H., Zhang S., Shi Y., Chen Q. Phages against pathogenic bacterial biofilms and biofilm-based infections: a review. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:427–440. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Waters C.M., Bassler B.L. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005;21:319–346. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.131001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Samrot A.V., Abubakar Mohamed A., Faradjeva E., Si Jie L., Hooi Sze C., Arif A., Chuan Sean T., Norbert Michael E., Yeok Mun C., Xiao Qi N., et al. Mechanisms and impact of biofilms and targeting of biofilms using bioactive compounds-a review. Medicina. 2021;57:839–846. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Luo H.Z., Zhou J.W., Sun B., Jiang H., Tang S., Jia A.Q. Inhibitory effect of norharmane on Serratia marcescens NJ01 quorum sensing-mediated virulence factors and biofilm formation. Biofouling. 2021;37:145–160. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2021.1874942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Orhan-Yanıkan E., Gülseren G., Ayhan K. Protein profile of bacterial extracellular polymeric substance by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Microchem. J. 2020;156:104831–104832. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sportelli M.C., Kranz C., Mizaikoff B., Cioffi N. Recent advances on the spectroscopic characterization of microbial biofilms: a critical review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2022;1195:339433–339443. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Barth A. Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. BBA Bioenerg. 2007;1767:1073–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bottomley M.J., Muraglia E., Bazzo R., Carfì A. Molecular insights into quorum sensing in the human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the structure of the virulence regulator LasR bound to its autoinducer. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:13592–13600. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700556200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chen G., Swem L.R., Swem D.L., Stauff D.L., O’ Loughlin C.T., Jeffrey P.D., Bassler B.L., Hughson F.M. A strategy for antagonizing quorum sensing. Mol. Cell. 2011;42:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Andrés C.L., Daddaoua A., Ortega A., Espinosa-Urgel M., Krell T. Rosmarinic acid is a homoserine lactone mimic produced by plants that activates a bacterial quorum-sensing regulator. Sci. Signal. 2016;9:ra1. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aaa8271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Corral Lugo A., Daddaoua A., Ortega A., Morel B., Díez Peña A.I., Espinosa-Urgel M., Krell T. Purification and characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasR expressed in acyl-homoserine lactone free Escherichia coli cultures. Protein Expr. Purif. 2017;130:107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2016.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Schnaider L., Brahmachari S., Schmidt N.W., Mensa B., Shaham-Niv S., Bychenko D., Adler-Abramovich L., Shimon L.J.W., Kolusheva S., DeGrado W.F., Gazit E. Self-assembling dipeptide antibacterial nanostructures with membrane disrupting activity. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1365. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01447-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Guyon L., Lepeltier E., Passirani C. Self-assembly of peptide-based nanostructures: synthesis and biological activity. Nano Res. 2018;11:2315–2335. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chang R., Zhao L., Xing R., Li J., Yan X. Functional chromopeptide nanoarchitectonics: molecular design, self-assembly and biological applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023;52:2688–2712. doi: 10.1039/d2cs00675h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Schnaider L., Rosenberg A., Kreiser T., Kolusheva S., Gazit E., Berman J. Peptide self-assembly is linked to antibacterial, but not antifungal, activity of histatin 5 derivatives. mSphere. 2020;5:e00021-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00021-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Xu H., Chen C.X., Hu J., Zhou P., Zeng P., Cao C.H., Lu J.R. Dual modes of antitumor action of an amphiphilic peptide A(9)K. Biomaterials. 2013;34:2731–2737. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gahan C.G., Patel S.J., Boursier M.E., Nyffeler K.E., Jennings J., Abbott N.L., Blackwell H.E., Van Lehn R.C., Lynn D.M. Bacterial quorum sensing signals self-assemble in aqueous media to form micelles and vesicles: an integrated experimental and molecular dynamics study. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2020;124:3616–3628. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c00496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hanelt M., Gareis M., Kollarczik B. Cytotoxicity of mycotoxins evaluated by the MTT-cell culture assay. Mycopathologia. 1994;128:167–174. doi: 10.1007/BF01138479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sun S., Dai X., Sun J., Bu X., Weng C., Li H., Zhu H. A diketopiperazine factor from Rheinheimera aquimaris QSI02 exhibits anti-quorum sensing activity. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:39637–39646. doi: 10.1038/srep39637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Khan F., Jeong M.C., Park S.K., Kim S.K., Kim Y.M. Contribution of chitooligosaccharides to biofilm formation, antibiotics resistance and disinfectants tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes. Microb. Pathog. 2019;136:103673–103682. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
-
•
All data produced in this study are included in the published article and its supplemental information, or are available from the lead contact upon request.
-
•
This paper does not report original code.
-
•
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.







