Abstract
Food Safety Commission of Japan (FSCJ) conducted a risk assessment of a sulfonanilide herbicide, dimesulfazet (CAS No. 1215111-77-5), based on results from various studies. The data used in the assessment include the fate in plants (paddy rice), residues in crops, fate in animals (rats), subacute toxicity (rats, mice and dogs), chronic toxicity (dogs), combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity (rats), carcinogenicity (mice), acute neurotoxicity (rats), subacute neurotoxicity (rats), two-generation reproductive toxicity (rats), developmental toxicity (rats and rabbits), and genotoxicity. The major adverse effects of dimesulfazet from those test results were observed in body weight (suppressed body weight gain in all test results), kidneys (increased weight in rats) and urinary bladder (urothelial hyperplasia in mice and dogs). None of carcinogenicity, neurotoxicity and genotoxicity were observed. No obvious effects on fertility were detected. The lowest no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) obtained from all the studies was 0.39 mg/kg bw per day in two-year combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study in rats. On the basis of this value, FSCJ specified an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 0.0039 mg/kg bw per day after applying a safety factor of 100 to the NOAEL. The lowest NOAEL for potential adverse effects after a single oral administration of dimesulfazet was 15 mg/kg bw per day in the developmental toxicity study in rabbits. FSCJ thus specified an acute reference dose (ARfD) of 0.15 mg/kg bw after applying a safety factor of 100 for women who are pregnant or might be pregnant. For the general population, an ARfD of 0.41 mg/kg bw after applying a safety factor of 300 (additional factor 3 by applying LOAEL of 125 mg/kg bw resulted from acute neurotoxicity study in rats).
Conclusion in Brief
Food Safety Commission of Japan (FSCJ) conducted a risk assessment of a sulfonanilide herbicide, dimesulfazet (CAS No. 1215111-77-5), based on results from various studies.
The data used in the assessment include the fate in plants (paddy rice), residues in crops, fate in animals (rats), subacute toxicity (rats, mice and dogs), chronic toxicity (dogs), combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity (rats), carcinogenicity (mice), acute neurotoxicity (rats), subacute neurotoxicity (rats), two-generation reproductive toxicity (rats), developmental toxicity (rats and rabbits), and genotoxicity.
The major adverse effects of dimesulfazet from those test results were observed in body weight (suppressed body weight gain in all test results), kidneys (increased weight in rats) and urinary bladder (urothelial hyperplasia in mice and dogs). None of carcinogenicity, neurotoxicity and genotoxicity were observed. No obvious effects on fertility were detected.
In developmental toxicity study in rabbits, an increase in the number of dams having abnormal fetuses and an increase in the number of abnormal fetuses (cardiovascular abnormalities) were observed.
Based on the results from various studies, dimesulfazet (parent compound only) was identified as the relevant substance for the residue definition for dietary risk assessment in agricultural products, fish and shellfish.
The lowest no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) obtained from all the studies was 0.39 mg/kg bw per day in two-year combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study in rats. On the basis of this value, FSCJ specified an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 0.0039 mg/kg bw per day after applying a safety factor of 100 to the NOAEL.
The lowest NOAEL for potential adverse effects after a single oral administration of dimesulfazet was 15 mg/kg bw per day in the developmental toxicity study in rabbits. The findings were an increased number of dams having abnormal fetuses and an increased number of abnormal fetuses (cardiovascular abnormalities). FSCJ thus specified an acute reference dose (ARfD) of 0.15 mg/kg bw after applying a safety factor of 100 for women who are pregnant or might be pregnant. For the general population, an ARfD of 0.41 mg/kg bw after applying a safety factor of 300 (additional factor 3 by applying LOAEL of 125 mg/kg bw resulted from acute neurotoxicity study in rats).
Table 1. Levels relevant to toxicological evaluation of dimesulfazet.
Species | Study | Dose (mg/kg bw per day) |
NOAEL (mg/kg bw per day) |
LOAEL (mg/kg bw per day) |
Critical endpoints1) |
Rat | 90-day subacute toxicity study | 0, 30, 100, 300, 1 000 ppm | M: 2.2 F: 10.5 |
M: 7.9 F: 29.8 |
M/F: Suppressed body weight gain, etc. |
M: 0, 2.2, 7.9, 24.3, 78.8 F: 0, 2.9, 10.5, 29.8, 115 | |||||
Two-year combined chronic
toxicity /carcinogenicity study |
0, 10, 30, 150, 300 ppm | M: 0.39 F: 1.53 |
M: 1.18 F: 7.71 |
M: Increase of relative kidney weight and
increase of BUN F: Suppressed body weight gain, etc. |
|
Carcinogenicity group M: 0, 0.39, 1.18, 5.87, 11.9 F: 0, 0.49, 1.53, 7.71, 15.7 52-week emergently slaughtered group M: 0, 0.47, 1.43, 7.18, 14.1 F: 0, 0.59, 1.76, 8.86, 18.7 | |||||
90-day subacute neurotoxicity study | 0, 30, 100, 300 ppm | M: 6.93 F: 28.2 |
M: 21.0 F: - |
M: Suppressed body weight gain and decreased
feed consumption F: No toxicity |
|
M: 0, 2.12, 6.93, 21.0 F: 0, 2.77, 9.26, 28.2 | |||||
Two-generation reproductive toxicity study | 0, 60, 200, 600 ppm | Parent PM: 3.8 PF: 4.7 F1M: 5.2 F1F: 5.4 Offspring PM: 12.8 PF: 15.6 F1M: 17.3 F1F: 17.8 |
Parent PM: 12.8 PF: 15.6 F1M: 17.3 F1F: 17.8 Offspring PM: 38.8 PF: 46.7 F1M: 52.6 F1F: 53.8 |
Parent M/F: Suppressed body weight gain, etc. Offspring M/F: Suppressed body weight gain (No effect on fertility is observed) |
|
Parent generation PM: 0, 3.8, 12.8, 38.8 PF: 0, 4.7, 15.6, 46.7 Offspring generation F1M: 0, 5.2, 17.3, 52.6 F1F: 0, 5.4, 17.8, 53.8 | |||||
Developmental toxicity study | 0, 5, 15, 50 | Dams: 50 Fetuses: 15 |
Dams: - Fetuses: 50 |
Dams: No toxicity Fetuses: Low body weight (No teratogenicity is observed) |
|
Mouse | 90-day subacute toxicity study | 0, 100, 300, 1 000 ppm | M: 37.1 F: 17.2 |
M: 126 F: 47.8 |
M: Suppressed body weight gain, etc. F: Decrease of TP |
M: 0, 12.8, 37.1, 126 F: 0, 17.2, 47.8, 166 | |||||
18-month carcinogenicity study | 0, 20, 60, 200, 600 ppm | M: 2.04 F: 2.42 |
M: 6.40 F: 7.12 |
M/F: Increase of pigmented (lipofuscin) macrophage of the cecum | |
M: 0, 2.04, 6.40, 20.7, 62.8 F: 0, 2.42, 7.12, 25.7, 75.7 | |||||
Rabbit | Developmental toxicity study | 0, 5, 15, 50 | Dams: 15 Fetuses: 15 |
Dams: 50 Fetuses: 50 |
Dams: Decreased in defecation and decreased body
weight Fetuses: Increased number of dams with abnormal fetuses and increased number of abnormal fetuses (with cardiovascular abnormalities) |
Dog | 90-day subacute toxicity study | 0, 3, 10, 30 | M: 10 F: 3 |
M: 30 F: 10 |
M: Suppressed body weight gain, etc. F: Increase of BUN |
One-year chronic toxicity study | 0, 1.5, 5, 15 | M/F: 5 | M/F: 15 | M: Increase of BUN F: Suppressed body weight gain, etc. |
|
ADI | NOAEL: 0.39 SF: 100 ADI: 0.0039 |
||||
The critical study for setting ADI | Two-year combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study in rat |
ADI, Acceptable daily intake; NOAEL, No-observed-adverse-effect level; LOAEL, Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level; SF, Safety factor; BUN, Blood urea nitrogen; TP, Total protein
-, NOAEL nor LOAEL could not be specified.
1) The adverse effect observed at LOAEL.
Table 2. 1 Potential adverse effects of a single oral administration of dimesulfazet (General population).
Species | Study | Dose (mg/kg bw) | Endpoints relevant to setting NOAEL and ARfD (mg/kg bw)1) |
Rat | Acute toxicity study | F: 300, 2 000 | F: - F: Hunchback position |
Acute neurotoxicity study | M/F: 0, 125, 250, 500 | M: - F: 125 M: Decreased in locomotor activity F: Decrease in activities, decreased times of standing upright and decreased in locomotor activity |
|
ARfD | LOAEL: 125 SF: 300 ARfD: 0.41 |
||
The critical study for setting ARfD | Acute neurotoxicity study in rat |
ARfD, Acute reference dose; LOAEL, Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level; SF, Safety factor; -, NOAEL could not be specified.
1) The adverse effect observed at LOAEL.
Table 2. 2 Potential adverse effects of a single oral administration of dimesulfazet (women who are pregnant or might be pregnant).
Species | Study | Dose (mg/kg bw per day) | Endpoints relevant to setting NOAEL and ARfD (mg/kg bw per day)1) |
Rabbit | Developmental toxicity study |
0, 5, 15, 50 | Fetuses: 15 Fetuses: Increased number of dams with abnormal fetuses and increased number of abnormal fetuses (with cardiovascular abnormalities) |
ARfD | NOAEL: 15 SF: 100 ARfD: 0.15 |
||
The critical study for setting ARfD | Developmental toxicity study in rabbit |
ARfD, Acute reference dose; NOAEL, No-observed-adverse-effect level; SF, Safety factor
1) The adverse effect observed at LOAEL.
Acknowledgment
FSCJ wishes to thank the members of the Expert Committee on Pesticides for preparation of the original full report1).
Abbreviation : FSCJ, Food Safety Commission of Japan
References
- 1.Food Safety Commission of Japan. Risk Assessment Report. Dimesulfazet (Pesticides) [in Japanese]. https://www.fsc.go.jp/fsciis/attachedFile/download?retrievalId=kya20221124210&fileId=210.