Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2023 Jun 5;12:e69322. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69322

Haploinsufficiency of the essential gene Rps12 causes defects in erythropoiesis and hematopoietic stem cell maintenance

Virginia Folgado-Marco 1,, Kristina Ames 2,3,, Jacky Chuen 1, Kira Gritsman 2,3,, Nicholas E Baker 1,
Editors: Michael Buszczak4, Richard M White5
PMCID: PMC10287158  PMID: 37272618

Abstract

Ribosomal protein (Rp) gene haploinsufficiency can result in Diamond-Blackfan Anemia (DBA), characterized by defective erythropoiesis and skeletal defects. Some mouse Rp mutations recapitulate DBA phenotypes, although others lack erythropoietic or skeletal defects. We generated a conditional knockout mouse to partially delete Rps12. Homozygous Rps12 deletion resulted in embryonic lethality. Mice inheriting the Rps12KO/+ genotype had growth and morphological defects, pancytopenia, and impaired erythropoiesis. A striking reduction in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and progenitors in the bone marrow (BM) was associated with decreased ability to repopulate the blood system after competitive and non-competitive BM transplantation. Rps12KO/+ lost HSC quiescence, experienced ERK and MTOR activation, and increased global translation in HSC and progenitors. Post-natal heterozygous deletion of Rps12 in hematopoietic cells using Tal1-Cre-ERT also resulted in pancytopenia with decreased HSC numbers. However, post-natal Cre-ERT induction led to reduced translation in HSCs and progenitors, suggesting that this is the most direct consequence of Rps12 haploinsufficiency in hematopoietic cells. Thus, RpS12 has a strong requirement in HSC function, in addition to erythropoiesis.

Research organism: Mouse

Introduction

In the cell, protein synthesis is one of the most energetically expensive processes, and both the specificity and overall level of translation are tightly regulated. The ribosome is the macromolecular machine tasked with translating mRNAs into proteins and, as such, plays an essential role in the physiology of the cell. Ribosomes are evolutionarily conserved ribonucleoprotein complexes composed of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and Rp (Yonath and Franceschi, 1998; Wilson and Doudna Cate, 2012). They catalyze protein synthesis in all cell types, providing a supply line of steady-state levels of necessary cellular proteins (Wilson and Doudna Cate, 2012). The functional components of the ribosome are highly conserved, and in higher eukaryotes consist of a small subunit (SSU: 40 S) and a large subunit (LSU: 60 S). These ribosomal subunits contain a total of 79 ribosomal proteins in eukaryotes, including 34 ribosomal proteins that are also conserved in prokaryotes (Petibon et al., 2021). In most cell types, ribosomal protein genes are among the most highly expressed genes (Geiger et al., 2012; Ji et al., 2019). Most ribosomal proteins are essential for ribosome biogenesis and function, which makes them essential for cell growth and proliferation (de la Cruz et al., 2015).

Given the importance of ribosomes, mutations in components of the ribosome or the ribosome biogenesis pathway in humans result in a group of diseases known as ribosomopathies. Despite the essential role of the ribosome in all cell types, this group of diseases is characterized by the presence of defects in specific tissues. Heterozygous loss of function mutations in many Rp genes leads to DBA, a congenital bone marrow failure syndrome characterized by macrocytic anemia, skeletal defects, and increased cancer risk. In DBA patients, mutations have been identified in 21 out of the 79 existing Rp genes, along with the GATA1 transcription factor (Ulirsch et al., 2018). Strikingly, in approximately 30–40% of DBA patient cases a mutation has not yet been identified. The fact that only a subset of all Rp genes has been found altered in DBA patients poses the question of whether mutations in any Rp gene can result in DBA and, if not, what would be the consequences for mutations in those Rp genes.

The generation and characterization of mice with mutations in Rp genes in recent years have begun to shed light on this question. Mutations in Rp genes of both the large and the small ribosomal subunits have been found to have similar phenotypes to those of DBA patients, such as impaired erythropoiesis, skeletal defects, and increased incidence of cancer, including some Rp not yet implicated in DBA (Oliver et al., 2004; McGowan et al., 2008; Jaako et al., 2011; Terzian et al., 2011; Morgado-Palacin et al., 2015; Schneider et al., 2016). However, erythropoietic defects are not always reported for mutants in Rp genes, including some that are implicated in human DBA (Matsson et al., 2004; Watkins-Chow et al., 2013; Kazerounian et al., 2016). Skeletal defects, but not impaired erythropoiesis, have been reported in mutants of Rpl24 or Rps7 (Oliver et al., 2004; Watkins-Chow et al., 2013).

In addition, a variety of other defects are reported in particular genotypes, ranging from embryonic lethality to brain defects, pigmentation defects, and defects in other aspects of hematopoiesis (McGowan et al., 2008; Kondrashov et al., 2011; Terzian et al., 2011; Watkins-Chow et al., 2013; Morgado-Palacin et al., 2015).

The Rps12 gene, which is not yet implicated in DBA, reportedly has special functions in Drosophila that differ from those of most Rp. Heterozygous loss of 66 out of the 79 Drosophila Rp genes results in a ‘Minute’ phenotype, named for its small adult sensory bristles and also characterized by delayed development (Marygold et al., 2007). Additionally, ‘Minute’ Rp+/ are eliminated by wild-type (WT) neighboring cells when they are found together in developing tissues, by a process known as cell competition (Morata and Ripoll, 1975; Clavería and Torres, 2016; Baker, 2020). Remarkably, delayed development, reduced translation, cell competition, and other aspects of the ‘Minute’ phenotype depend on the Rps12 protein, which seems to be required for haploinsufficient effects of other Rp genes, suggesting that Rps12 acts as a sensor or reporter of deficits in other Rp. Accordingly, increasing the copy number of Rps12 enhances these ‘Minute’ phenotypes caused by mutations in other Rp genes, whereas reducing the Rps12 gene copy number suppresses them (Kale et al., 2018; Boulan et al., 2019; Ji et al., 2019). Rps12 forms part of the beak region of the 40 S small ribosomal subunit (SSU), near to the mRNA entry channel (Rabl et al., 2011). Interestingly, Rps12 is one of the few Rp genes whose null mutation does not present a ‘Minute’ bristle phenotype in heterozygosis (Marygold et al., 2007; Kale et al., 2018). In mammals, it has been reported that Rps12 deletions are frequent in diffuse large B cell lymphoma samples, and that Rps12 distribution in the ribosomes is altered under hypoxic conditions in the human embryonic kidney cell line, HEK293, resulting in changes of their translatome (Derenzini et al., 2019; Brumwell et al., 2020). Human Rps12 has also emerged as a candidate regulator of Wnt secretion in cancer cells (Katanaev et al., 2020). However, the phenotype of Rps12 deletion in mammals has not been determined.

Protein synthesis regulation is important in stem cells. To maintain proper homeostasis, HSCs sustain the balance between a quiescent and an actively dividing state (Cabezas-Wallscheid et al., 2017). Quiescent HSCs require low rates of protein synthesis, and even HSCs exiting quiescence still exhibit significantly lower translation rates than more differentiated progenitors. Both increases and decreases in protein synthesis levels can impair HSC function (Signer et al., 2014; Hidalgo San Jose et al., 2020).

The AKT/MTORC1 signaling pathway is one of the best-known signaling pathways that regulate translation, in part through the expression of ribosomal proteins and translation factors (Fonseca et al., 2014). Hyperactivation of AKT signaling is deleterious for normal HSC function, and results in increased HSC cycling, with depletion of the stem cell pool (Yilmaz et al., 2006; Kharas et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2010; Magee et al., 2012). Activation of AKT by stem cell factor (SCF) and other growth factors leads to the activation of MTOR, which results in the phosphorylation of the ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) and the protein initiation factor 4E binding protein1 (4EBP1) (Gentilella et al., 2015). Phosphorylation of S6 by S6K1 at Serine 235/Ser236 is associated with increased protein translation (Krieg et al., 1988; Roux and Topisirovic, 2018). Additionally, phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 by MTOR at the Thr37 and Thr46 residues primes it for dissociation of 4E-BP1 from eIF4E, also activating translation (Schalm et al., 2003). Furthermore, another important pathway regulating growth and translation, the MEK/ERK pathway, has been shown to phosphorylate S6 at Serine 235/Ser236 promoting the translation preinitiation complex in mammalian cells (Roux et al., 2007).

To further explore the specific functions of Rp genes, their potential involvement in DBA, and the regulation of translation, we determined the phenotype of Rps12 deletion in mice. We generated a conditional knock-out mouse, Rps12flox/flox, which, when crossed to embryonically expressed Ella-Cre recombinase, allowed us to generate homozygous (Rps12KO/KO) and heterozygous knock-out mice (Rps12KO/+). We report that, while homozygous loss of Rps12 is lethal early in embryogenesis, the viable heterozygous Rps12KO/+ phenotype includes reduced body size, morphological defects, and, in some cases, hydrocephalus. Similar to DBA patients, and some other previously published Rp mouse mutants, Rps12KO/+ mice present a block in erythroid maturation, lower red cell counts, and decreased spleen size. However, reduction in Rps12 also leads to a striking reduction in the number of hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow, as well as significantly altered progenitor populations, leading to overall reduced bone marrow cellularity and a decreased ability of Rps12KO/+ BM cells to repopulate the blood system, uncovering an impairment in HSC and progenitor function. Inducible, conditional heterozygous deletion of Rps12 in adult hematopoietic cells also led to decreased HSC and progenitor cell numbers and pancytopenia. Interestingly, global translation was decreased after acute deletion, but increased in mice heterozygous for Rps12 from fertilization. Our work has uncovered important roles for RpS12 in translation and signaling in hematopoietic cells.

Results

Rps12 haploinsufficiency results in a pleiotropic phenotype, including delayed growth and increased mortality

To test the role of the Rps12 protein in a mammal, we used CRISPR gene editing to generate a mouse line with LoxP sites flanking exons 2 and 3 of the endogenous Rps12 locus (Rps12flox) (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Excision of these two exons generates an allele that cannot produce functional RpS12 protein, since exon 2 contains the ATG translation initiation codon. We chose not to eliminate the entire Rps12 locus, to avoid deleting the small nucleolar RNA genes Snord100 and Snora33, which are located in introns 4 and 5, respectively (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). We crossed Rps12flox/flox mice to a line that expresses the Cre recombinase embryonically (EIIa-Cre) to obtain Rps12 heterozygous knock-out (KO) mice (Rps12KO/+) (Figure 1A). Unlike heterozygous null flies, which don’t have any observable phenotype (Marygold et al., 2007; Kale et al., 2018), Rps12KO/+ mice have reduced growth rates post-partum in comparison to their wild-type littermates (Figure 1B and C). Additional phenotypes include kinked tails, mild hyperpigmentation of the footpads, and an increased incidence of hydrocephalus (Figure 1D, E and F). Except for hydrocephalus, these phenotypes have also been found in some other Rp mutant mouse models (Oliver et al., 2004; McGowan et al., 2008; Terzian et al., 2011). Furthermore, Rps12KO/+ mice have increased mortality, especially in early post-natal stages, most of which is associated with hydrocephalus or the inability to gain weight (Figure 1G).

Figure 1. Loss of one copy of Rps12 results in delayed growth, morphologic defects, and reduced viability.

(A) Conditional Rps12flox transgenic knock-in has two loxP sites flanking exons 2 and 3, that are removed by Cre-ERT recombinase activity to generate Rps12KO. (B) Post-natal growth curve of Rps12KO/+ and Rps12+/+ littermates (+/+ n=8 and KO/+ n=11 pups). (C) Picture of 5-day-old Rps12KO/+ and Rps12+/+ littermates. (D) Representative picture of ’kinked’ tail in Rps12KO/+ mouse. (E) Representative picture of the anterior footpad hyperpigmentation in Rps12KO/+. (F) Quantification of the percentage of mice presenting hydrocephalus per litter (n=27 litters, two-way ANOVA p=0.0035). (G) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of Rps12KO/+ and Rps12+/+ littermates starting at day 5 of age (+/+ n=39 and KO/+ n=60, log-rank Mantel-Cox test p=0.012). (H) Embryo genotype segregation from crosses between Rps12KO/+ male and female. Graph represents the percentage of developed embryos and the table shows the total numbers (E%=expected percentages, E#=expected numbers, O=observed numbers). (I) Representative pictures of E13.5 embryos with their placentas. (J) E13.5 embryo weights (n=10 on each genotype, unpaired t-test p=0.0420). Statistical analysis: quantifications represent mean +/− SEM, shown as the error bars.

Figure 1—source data 1. Growth and embryo development.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. CRISPR gene editing and genotyping strategy for the generation of Rps12flox and Rps12KO.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Diagram of the WT, Flox, and KO alleles of Rps12 generated in this study indicating the position of Snord100 and Snora33 (snoRNA),Cas9 gRNAs target locations, and primers used for genotyping. The homology arms starting sites are indicated and the ends fall outside of the Rps12 locus. To identify the first transformants, two pair of primers were used for PCR amplification: F2/R2 and F3/R3. F2 and R3 fall outside of the sequence covered by the homology arms, to ensure the inserts are on the correct location. The presence of LoxP sites was confirmed by Sanger sequencing using primers F1 and F4 for F2/R2 fragments, and with F3 and R3 for F3/R3 fragments. To determine excision of exons 2 and 3 by Cre-ERT recombination primers F1 and R1 were used, which generate a 900 bp fragment in Rps12+ and a 300 bp fragment in RpS12KO (B).
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Blot for Figure 1—figure supplement 1B.
The complete blot from which Figure 1—figure supplement 1B was derived is shown on the left. The 900 bp and 300 bp bands are marked on the right, as is the portion cropped for Figure 1—figure supplement 1B.

To investigate if the KO allele of Rps12 is lethal in the homozygous state, and whether Rps12KO/+ animals have reduced growth during embryonic development, we crossed heterozygous Rps12KO/+ male and female mice and analyzed the resulting embryos at stage E13.5 (we could not assess frequencies in pups at birth because Rps12KO/+ females invariably died during labor). There were no Rps12KO/KO specimens among the embryos obtained (Figure 1H), which led us to conclude that this genotype must be lethal prior to stage E13.5. Furthermore, Rps12KO/+ embryos were smaller in size compared to their wildtype counterparts (Figure 1I and J). Therefore, these results indicate that Rps12 is an essential gene, whose homozygous loss leads to early embryonic lethality, and heterozygous loss causes reduced growth starting in embryogenesis, in addition to other defects recognized post-partum.

Heterozygous loss of Rps12 results in erythropoiesis defects that worsen with age

We sought to understand if, similar to other Rp mutant mouse models, Rps12 heterozygous mutants have anemia or defective erythropoiesis. Analysis of peripheral blood counts showed that ‘young’ (6–8 weeks old) Rps12KO/+ mice had a lower number of white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC), and platelets, a condition known as pancytopenia (Figure 2A). We also observed a high mean corpuscular volume (MCV), which is reminiscent of the macrocytic anemia seen in DBA patients.

Figure 2. Haploinsufficiency of Rps12 results in erythropoiesis defects that worsen with age.

Figure 2.

(A) Quantification of peripheral blood counts from young (6–8 weeks) littermates (+/+ n=10 and KO/+ n=13) (WBC=white blood cells, RBC=red blood cell, MCV=mean corpuscular volume). (B) Representative flow cytometry gating of bone marrow cells from 6- to 8-weeks-old mice of erythropoietic populations using Ter119 and CD71 markers. (C, D, E, F) Frequencies of erythroid progenitors in the bone marrow and spleen of young (6- to 7-weeks-old, +/+ n=4 and KO/+ n=4) and older (6- to 7-months-old, +/+ n=5 and KO/+ n=5) mice. (G) Total number of CFU-E and BFU-E colonies per plate (5 x 105 bone marrow (BM) cells plated) in methylcellulose media supplemented with EPO (M3434) from young mice (6- to 7-weeks-old, +/+ n=4 and KO/+ n=4, each biological sample had two replicates) and older mice (6- to 7-months-old, +/+ n=4, and KO/+ n=4, each biological sample had two replicates). Statistical analysis: quantifications represent mean +/− SEM, shown as the error bars, when only two groups were being compared, unpaired t-test was performed, and for multiple comparisons one-way ANOVA analysis was used. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Figure 2—source data 1. Erythropoiesis in younger and older mice.

To analyze erythropoiesis in Rps12KO/+ mice, we used flow cytometry with the lineage markers Ter119 and CD71 on bone marrow and spleen cells (Figure 2B). These populations represent different maturation stages of the red blood cell production process, which we refer to as RI (CD71+, Ter119, proerythroblasts), RII (CD71+Ter119+, basophilic erythroblasts), RIII (CD71mid, Ter119+, late basophilic and polychromatophilic erythroblasts), and RIV (CD71-Ter119+, orthochromatic erythroblasts) (Socolovsky et al., 2001). Bone marrow samples from young Rps12KO/+ mice showed a defective transition between the RII and RIII stage cells, while the erythropoiesis in spleen populations was unchanged (Figure 2C and D). This impairment in erythropoiesis worsened with age, as samples from ‘older’ (6- to 7-month-old) Rps12KO/+ mice had a higher accumulation of RII and RIII stage cells, while RIV population numbers were decreased in both spleen and bone marrow samples at this age (Figure 2E and F). To assess erythropoietic progenitor function, we performed colony-forming unit (CFU) assays in methylcellulose media optimized for the differentiation of erythroid progenitors. Consistent with the observed impairment of erythropoiesis, Rps12KO/+ bone marrow cells generated fewer BFU-E colonies, indicating reduced erythroid progenitors (Figure 2G). Altogether, these results show that Rps12 is required for erythroid differentiation, and demonstrate a role for Rps12 in erythropoiesis, similar to what has been observed in mouse models of DBA genes like Rpl11, Rps19, and Rps14 (Jaako et al., 2011; Morgado-Palacin et al., 2015; Schneider et al., 2016).

Rps12KO/+ mice have a striking reduction in hematopoietic progenitor populations, resulting in chronic pancytopenia

We were intrigued by the fact that Rps12KO/+ mice have pancytopenia (Figure 2A), since this is not a common feature of DBA patients. Due to the general decrease of peripheral blood cell numbers in Rps12KO/+ mice, we hypothesized that hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) might be affected. Using flow cytometry analysis, we assessed the stem cell and progenitor populations in the bone marrow using previously defined markers (Pietras et al., 2015; Figure 3A). Indeed, compared to the controls, Rps12KO/+ revealed a striking reduction in the numbers of long-term HSCs (LT-HSCs: Flk2CD48CD150+ Lineage-Sca1+c-kit+ (LSK)) and short-term HSCs (ST-HSCs: Flk2CD48CD150LSK) (Figure 3B). In addition, in Rps12KO/+ bone marrow, the numbers of all hematopoietic progenitor populations were significantly reduced (Figure 3C; Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). Accordingly, compared to the WT littermates, young (6- to 8-weeks-old) Rps12KO/+ mice had lower bone marrow cellularity, without obvious changes in the bone marrow architecture or dysplasia, and decreased spleen weights (Figure 3D and E, Figure 3—figure supplement 1A, B). Additionally, older (6- to 7-month-old) Rps12KO/+ mice also had lower HSC numbers and frequency (Figure 3F, Figure 3—figure supplement 1C and D). Interestingly, we observed a partial recovery of some of the HSPC populations with age, such as multi-potent progenitors (MPP) 2 and 3, and the granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMP), as well as normalized overall BM cellularity, but not of spleen size (Figure 3G, H and I, Figure 3—figure supplement 1D). This, however, did not lead to improved blood counts (Figure 3J), indicating that HSPC function was not significantly improved with age.

Figure 3. Reduced hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and other hematopoietic progenitor numbers in Rps12KO/+ mice.

(A) Representative gating strategy used to identify bone marrow populations of LSKs: long-term HSC (LT- HSC), short-term HSC (ST-HSC), multi-potent progenitors (MPP2, MPP3, MPP4), and myeloid progenitors (MPROG): common myeloid progenitor (CMP), granulocyte-monocyte progenitor (GMP), megakaryocyte-erythrocyte (MEP), and common lymphoid progenitor (CLP). (B) Total LT-HSCs and ST-HSCs per femur of young mice (6- to 8-weeks-old littermates, +/+ n=4, and KO/+ n=3). (C) Total number of cells per femur of indicated hematopoietic progenitor populations in young mice (6- to 8-weeks-old littermates, +/+ n=4, and KO/+ n=3). (D) Bone marrow cellularity is represented as cells per femur ×106 from young mice (6- to 7-weeks-old littermates, +/+ n=10, and KO/+ n=10). (E) Spleen weights of young (6- to 7-weeks-old, +/+ n=10, and KO/+ n=10) mice. (F) Total HSCs per femur of older mice (6- to 7-month-old, +/+ n=3, and KO/+ n=4). (G) Total number of cells per femur of indicated hematopoietic progenitor populations in older mice (6- to 7-month-old, +/+ n=3, and KO+ n=4). (H) Bone marrow cellularity is represented as cells per femur ×106 from older mice (older: 6- to 7-months-old, +/+ n=3, and KO/+ n=9). (I) Spleen weights of older (6- to 7-months-old, +/+ n=8, and KO/+ n=14) mice. (J) Quantification of peripheral blood counts from older mice (6- to 7 months old, +/+ n=8, and KO/+ n=11). (K) Total number of colonies per plate (1 × 104 bone marrow (BM) cells from 6- to 7-month-old mice plated in round 1 and 1 × 104 cells plated from the previous plate on each re-plating round) on each round of re-plating in complete methylcellulose media (+/+ n=5 and KO/+ n=5, 2 replicates per biological sample). Statistical analysis: quantifications represent mean +/− SEM, shown as the error bars, unpaired t-tests were performed to establish significance among populations between genotypes *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Figure 3—source data 1. HSCs and progenitor population distributions.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Heterozygous loss of Rps12 in the hematopoietic cells.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A, B) Photomicrographs of H&E-stained sections of the bone marrow from a wild-type (WT) and Rps12KO/+ at (A) 8 weeks and (B) 6-month-old animals. Images are taken at 20 x magnification. (C, D) Frequency of the LT-HSCs, ST-HSCs, and progenitor populations (C) in young mice (6–8 weeks old littermates, +/+ n=4, and KO/+ n=3) and in (D) older mice (6- to 7-month-old, +/+ n=3, and KO/+ n=4). Statistical analysis: quantifications represent mean +/− SEM, shown as the error bars. Significance was determined using the Welch’s t-test ns ≥0.05, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Frequency of hematopoietic progenitors.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. Decreased Rps12 and unaffected snoRNA expression levels in Rps12KO/+ mice.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

(A) Comparison of total Rps12 mRNA levels measured by qPCR in cKit +bone marrow cells normalized to housekeeping genes GAPDH, RER1, and HPRT1, between Rps12+/+ and Rps12KO/+ mice. (B) Comparison of total Snord100 and Snora33 small RNAs levels measured by qPCR normalized to housekeeping small RNAs U6, Sno22, and Sno234. (C) Quantification by western blot of the relative levels of Rps12 protein in cKit + bone marrow cells normalized to housekeeping gene ACTB between Rps12+/+ and Rps12KO/+ mice. (D) Comparison on the 28 S and 18 S ribosomal subunits ratio between Rps12+/+ and Rps12KO/+ mice provided by RNA analysis in Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (D’) Representative RNA profiles from Rps12+/+ and Rps12KO/+ mice ckit + bone marrow samples. (A, B, C, D) Biological samples are +/+ n=4 and KO/+ n=4. Statistical analysis: quantifications represent mean +/− SEM,shown as the error bars, unpaired t-tests were performed to establish significance among populations between genotypes *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Blots of cKit + bone marrow cells.
(A) Complete blot corresponding to Figure 3—figure supplement 2C labeled with Ponceau S. The labeled blot is shown below including the region cropped for Figure 3—figure supplement 2C. (B) Complete blot corresponding to Figure 3—figure supplement 2C after western blotting with actin- and Rps12-specific antibodies (blot was cut in two). (C) Blots from panel B with labels, including regions cropped for Figure 3—figure supplement 2C.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 2. RNA levels in ckit BM cells.

To correlate these phenotypes with the expression levels of Rps12, rather than of the small RNAs Snord100 and Snora33, we performed RT-PCR and Western-blot analysis of cKit-enriched bone marrow cells. As expected, RT-PCR results showed a highly significant decrease in the Rps12 mRNA levels in Rps12KO/+ cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 2A) but no difference in the levels of Snord100 and Snora33 (Figure 3—figure supplement 2B). Western-blot analysis also showed a strong trend toward decreased Rps12 protein levels in cKit + bone marrow cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 2C). We observed no changes to the ratio of the 28 S and 18 S rRNAs (Figure 3—figure supplement 2D), suggesting that steady-state SSU numbers were not depleted overall.

Lastly, since Rps12 deletion resulted in decreased HSC and progenitor numbers, we assessed the self-renewal capacity of Rps12KO/+ bone marrow cells. Plating assays in complete methylcellulose media showed a decreased clonogenic activity of Rps12KO/+ bone marrow cells, as evidenced by the lower number of total colonies observed in the first round of plating (Figure 3K). Additionally, Rps12KO/+ cells have reduced serial replating capacity, suggesting decreased self-renewal capacity (Figure 3K). Together, these results suggest that RpS12 plays an essential role in HSC function.

Heterozygous loss of Rps12 impairs the ability of HSCs to reconstitute peripheral blood

We assessed the self-renewal and differentiation properties of Rps12KO/+ bone marrow cells (CD45.2+) in vivo by transplanting bone marrow into lethally irradiated B6.SJL mice (CD45.1+) (Figure 4A). Interestingly, compared to the Rps12flox/flox or Rps12flox/+ controls, Rps12KO/+ bone marrow recipients had decreased survival, with 5 out of 20 transplanted mice dying within the first 8 weeks in the Rps12KO/+ group vs 0 out of 20 dying in the control group (Figure 4B). Whereas 100% of the control recipients were able to reconstitute the bone marrow in the long term (up to 20 weeks), only 55% of the Rps12KO/+ recipients did so (Figure 4C). Furthermore, longitudinal analysis of donor chimerism in the peripheral blood revealed that compared to the controls, surviving Rps12KO/+ transplant recipients had significantly decreased donor chimerism (%CD45.2+) in the B and T cell lineages, and a trend toward decreased chimerism in the myeloid lineage (Figure 4D–G). Together, this data suggests that bone marrow cells that lack RpS12 are deficient in hematopoietic repopulating capacity after lethal irradiation.

Figure 4. Heterozygous loss of Rps12 impairs hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) ability to reconstitute peripheral blood.

Figure 4.

(A) Non-competitive bone marrow (BM) transplant strategy testing the long-term reconstituting activity of Rps12KO/+ HSCs. 106 bone marrow cells from Rps12KO/+ or Rps12flox/flox samples (CD45.2+) were transplanted into lethally irradiated B6.SJL (CD45.1+) mice, peripheral blood chimerism was determined every 4 weeks. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of mice transplanted with BM cells from Rps12KO/+ and control Rps12flox/+ or Rps12flox/flox mice (control n=20 and KO/+ n=20 transplanted mice, the combination of two independent non-competitive transplants with 1 donor per genotype transplanted into 10 host mice each). (C) Frequency of recipient mice with long-term (20 weeks) multi-lineage reconstitution (≥0.5% in all three macrophages, B, and T cells) (control n=20 and KO/+ n=20 transplanted mice, the combination of two independent non-competitive transplants). (D–G) Peripheral blood donor-derived (D) total chimerism and (E–G) multi-lineage chimerism in non-competitively transplanted whole bone marrow (CD45.2+) recipients (flox/flox n=10 and KO/+ n=10). (H) Schematic representation of the competitive bone marrow transplant. 5 × 105 cells from Rps12KO/+ or Rps12flox/+ donor bone marrow (CD45.2+) mixed with 5 × 105 competitor bone marrow cells from B6.SJL (CD45.1+) mice were injected into lethally irradiated B6.SJL (CD45.1+) mice. Chimerism in peripheral blood was determined every 4 weeks and bone marrow chimerism was analyzed at 20 weeks after transplant. (I) Total bone marrow chimerism and (J) HSCs donor-derived (CD45.2+) chimerism in the recipient bone marrow (flox/+ n=10 and KO/+ n=10 competitive-transplanted mice). (K–N) Donor-derived peripheral blood chimerism of competitively transplanted Rps12KO/+ or Rps12flox/+ bone marrow cells as described in (H). Non- competitive transplants were performed twice, using different controls: Rps12flox/+ or Rps12flox/flox. The competitive transplant was performed once, using Rps12flox/+ mice as a control group. Statistical analysis: data represent mean +/− SEM, shown as the error bars, unpaired t-tests were performed to assess significance among populations between genotypes *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Figure 4—source data 1. Bone marrow transplants.

To assess Rps12KO/+ bone marrow cell repopulation capacity under more stringent conditions, we performed competitive transplantation of control (Rps12flox/+) or Rps12KO/+ bone marrow (CD45.2+) mixed with competitor WT bone marrow from B6.SJL mice (CD45.1+) in a 1:1 ratio into lethally irradiated B6.SJL (CD45.1+) recipient mice. Post-transplantation we monitored donor chimerism in the peripheral blood over time and analyzed the bone marrow chimerism at 20 weeks post-transplantation (Figure 4H). Compared to the controls, Rps12KO/+ transplant recipients showed a striking decrease in the percentage of donor-derived bone marrow cells and of HSCs (Figure 4I and J), accompanied by a significant and persistent reduction in peripheral blood total donor chimerism in both myeloid and lymphoid lineages (Figure 4K–N). Together, these data suggest that Rps12 haploinsufficiency leads to perturbed HSC self-renewal, resulting in ineffective hematopoiesis.

The embryonic hematopoietic system is largely unaffected in Rps12KO/+ animals

The striking reduction of hematopoietic progenitor numbers in Rps12KO/+ adult bone marrow prompted us to investigate if this phenotype could be a consequence of defective HSC production in the fetal liver during embryogenesis. We analyzed fetal liver hematopoietic populations of E13.5 Rps12+/+ and Rps12KO/+ embryos because it has been shown that HSC numbers increase, and differentiation begins, between days 12 and 16 of embryogenesis in this organ (Sugiyama et al., 2011). First, we looked at the gross morphology and cellularity of the liver, neither of which were significantly different between the genotypes (Figure 5A and B). Next, we assessed different stages of erythropoiesis using Ter119 and CD71 markers as previously described in fetal liver (Magee and Signer, 2021). Most of the cells in population V were lost during staining, and, therefore, we did not include them in our analysis. Compared to the control embryos, Rps12KO/+ embryos showed no apparent impairment in erythropoiesis in the fetal liver (Figure 5C and D). Finally, we analyzed the distribution of HSPCs in E13.5 embryos. Overall, we did not observe any significant changes in the frequencies of LT-HSCs (CD48CD150+ LSK), ST-HSCs (CD48CD150 LSK), MPP (CD48+ LSK), CMP, GMP, or MEP populations (Figure 5E–H). These results show that partial loss of Rps12 does not affect embryonic hematopoiesis by E13.5. Therefore, the later HSPC deficiency is not a consequence of a defect in the embryonic specification.

Figure 5. Embryonic hematopoietic system is largely unaffected in Rps12KO/+ animals.

Figure 5.

(A) Representative images of Rps12+/- and littermate E13.5 fetal livers. (B) Quantification of the total number of cells per liver, normalized to embryo weight (+/+ n=9 and KO/+ n = 8). (C) Representative flow cytometry gating of erythropoietic populations using Ter119 and CD71 markers of fetal liver samples from E13.5 embryos. (E) Representative flow cytometry gating of Lin- (top) and LSK (bottom) populations in E13.5 fetal livers. (F, G, H) LT-HSCs, ST-HSCs, and indicated progenitor populations represented as percentages of the Lin- population in E13.5 fetal livers. (D, F, G, H) Biological samples are +/+ n=8 and KO/+ n=4. Statistical analysis: quantifications represent mean +/− SEM, shown as the error bars, unpaired t-tests were performed to establish significance among populations between genotypes *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Figure 5—source data 1. Fetal liver hematopoietic populations.

Rps12KO/+ HSCs and some hematopoietic progenitors show higher translation, cycling, and apoptosis

There are several important factors that maintain the HSC pool, including quiescence, low translation levels, and cell survival. We, therefore, analyzed the distribution of HSPCs among the cell cycle stages defined by the DNA content (Hoechst) and the levels of Ki67 (Figure 6A). We observed a lower proportion of Rps12KO/+ HSCs in the G0 stage of the cell cycle, and a significantly increased proportion in the active cycling phases G1 and S/G2/M (Figure 6B). Similar results were observed in MPP2/3 (LSK, Flk2, CD48+), MPP4, and myeloid (MPROG) and common lymphoid progenitors (CLP) (Figure 6B). These results show that compared to the control, Rps12KO/+ HSCs are significantly less quiescent, with a higher proportion of HSCs and progenitors actively cycling.

Figure 6. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and other hematopoietic progenitors have altered cycling, global translation levels, and apoptosis in Rps12KO/+ bone marrow.

Figure 6.

(A) Representative flow cytometry gating of HSCs (Flk2CD48LSK) cell cycle stages (G0, G1, S/G2/M) distribution determined by DNA (Hoechst) and Ki67 levels. (B) Cell cycle stages distribution in HSCs and in indicated progenitor populations. Asterisks correspond to p values assessing significant differences in each cell cycle stage between Rps12KO/+ and Rps12+/+ mice (6- to 8-week-old littermates, +/+ n=4, and KO/+ n=3). (C) Representative flow cytometry histogram showing OPP intensity in RpS12KO/+ (green) and Rps12+/+ (gray) HSCs. (D, E) Median o-propargyl puromycin (OPP) intensity of the indicated bone marrow populations (6- to 8-week-old littermates, +/+ n=4, and KO/+ n=3). This analysis was repeated in 6- to 7-month-old mice with similar results. (F) Representative images of bone marrow cytospins showing the high number of apoptotic cells (arrows) in Rps12KO/+ samples. (G) Representative flow cytometry gating of LIN- population showing apoptotic populations as determined by AnexinV and PI staining. (H, I) Percentage of apoptotic (AnnexinV+) cells in LSK (LincKit+Sca1+) and Myeloid progenitor (MPROG; LincKit+Sca1) populations (6- to 8-weeks-old littermates, +/+ n=4, and KO/+ n=3). Statistical analysis: quantifications represent mean +/− SEM, shown as the error bars, two-way ANOVA (B–F), and unpaired t-tests were performed to establish significance among populations between genotypes *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Figure 6—source data 1. Hematopoietic population cycling, apoptosis, and translation.

Cell cycle activation generally requires translation, but previous studies have reported a generalized decrease in global translation in some Rp mutants, including in HSPC, despite a decrease in HSC quiescence (Oliver et al., 2004; Signer et al., 2014; Schneider et al., 2016). To assess the global translation levels of each HSPC population in Rps12 heterozygous mice using flow cytometry, we performed an ex vivo assay on freshly isolated HSCs and progenitors using the puromycin analog o-propargyl puromycin (OPP) as previously described (Signer et al., 2014). Unexpectedly, compared to the Rps12+/+ controls, Rps12KO/+ HSCs and multipotent progenitor cell populations all showed increased levels of global translation (Figure 6C and D). The difference was especially remarkable in HSCs. Interestingly, compared to the controls, Rps12KO/+ myeloid progenitors did not exhibit differences in OPP intensity, and among different myeloid progenitor populations, only the megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitors (MEP) had a significant increase in OPP incorporation (Figure 6E). Thus, these data suggest that a decrease in RpS12 leads to an abnormal increase in global protein translation in immature bone marrow populations, including HSCs.

Cell death can deplete the HSC pool and can result from chronic HSC activation. We asked whether this reduction of HSCs in Rps12KO/+ animals is due to an increase in apoptosis. Interestingly, compared to controls, Rps12KO/+ animals have an increased number of apoptotic cells in bone marrow cytospins (Figure 6F). To quantify the level of apoptosis in the immunophenotypic populations in the bone marrow, we used the flow cytometry markers PI and Annexin V together with population-specific cell surface markers (Figure 6G). Our flow cytometry analysis confirmed a significant increase in apoptosis in Lineage-Sca1+c-Kit+ (LSK) cells, a population that contains HSCs and MPPs, but not in more mature myeloid progenitors (Figure 6H and I).

Rps12KO/+ HSPCs have overactivated MEK/ERK and AKT/MTOR signaling pathways

Because Rps12KO/+ mutants have increased translation, we assessed the activity of the AKT/MTOR pathway, since it is known to regulate translation. Since the AKT/MTOR pathway is activated by stem cell factor (SCF), we determined the level of the AKT/MTOR pathway activation in the presence and absence of SCF, by assessing the phosphorylation levels of phospho-AKT (Ser 473) and the MTOR downstream effectors phospho-S6 (Ser235/236) and phospho-4E-BP1 (Thr37/46). Our results show that, in the more immature LSK population, which includes HSCs and MPPs, the levels of p-AKT, p-S6, and p-4E-BP1 were significantly elevated in Rps12KO/+ animals compared to wild-type littermates, not only upon SCF stimulation, but even at the non-stimulated baseline (Figure 7A–C). Interestingly, this was not the case for the more mature myeloid progenitor cells, where the levels of p-AKT, p-S6, and p-4E-BP1 are comparable to the controls in both non-stimulated and SCF-stimulated conditions, and these cells also exhibited more normal translation rates (Figure 7D–F). Since phosphorylation of S6 and 4EBP1 leads to increased translation, this data corroborates the increase in translation observed in the Rps12KO/+ LSK population (Figure 6D). Interestingly, more mature MPROG do not have increased translation (Figure 6E) and do not have increased activation of the AKT/MTOR pathway (Figure 7D–F). Together, these data suggest that activation of translation and the increase in AKT/MTOR signaling in Rps12KO/+ mutant cells are specific to HSCs and MPPs.

Figure 7. Decreased Rps12 levels lead to the excessive activation of the AKT/MTOR and ERK signaling pathways.

Figure 7.

(A–H) Representative phospho-flow cytometry histograms and quantification of the normalized geometric mean fluorescent intensity of pAKT (Ser 473) (A, D), pS6 (Ser235/236) (B, E), p4EBP1 (Thr37/46) (C, F), and pERK1(Thr202/Tyr204) (D, H) signal in the LSK (A, B, C, G) and MPROG (D, E, F, H) bone marrow cell populations. Baseline signal was determined in the none treated (NT) serum-starved cells, stimulation was done with the stem cell factor (SCF) ex vivo for 5 min. Immunophenotypic populations were defined as follows: LSK: LincKit+Sca1+, MPROG: LincKit+Sca1. (I) Representative images of western blot analysis and quantification of phospho-eIF2α normalized to the total eIF2α protein in cKit-enriched BM samples (6- to 8-weeks-old littermates, +/+ n=4, and KO/+ n=4) (A–H) 7-weeks-old littermates, +/+ n=6, and KO/+ n=6 biological samples were used. Statistical analysis: quantifications represent mean +/− SEM, shown as the error bars, one-way ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were performed to establish significance among samples between genotypes.

Figure 7—source data 1. Blots of cKit + bone marrow cells.
(A) Complete blot shown in Figure 7I, after blotting with anti-βactin. On the right the blot is shown with labels and with the section cropped for Figure 7I indicated. (B) Complete blot showed after blotting with anti-IF2α. On the right the blot is shown with labels and with the section cropped for Figure 7I indicated. (C) Complete blot showed after blotting with anti-pIF2α. On the right the blot is shown with labels and with the section cropped for Figure 7I indicated.
Figure 7—source data 2. pAKT, pS6, and pERK1 levels in hematopoietic progenitors.

Additionally, compared to wild-type controls, Rps12KO/+ mutant animals also have increased phospho-ERK1 (Thr202/Tyr204) in the LSK and MPROG populations under SCF-stimulated and non-stimulated conditions (Figure 7G and H). Another regulator of translation is the eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α), which is required for CAP-dependent translation initiation. Cells respond to several stress conditions by phosphorylating eIF2α, reducing global translation, and upregulating stress-response genes (Wek et al., 2006; Sigurdsson and Miharada, 2018). In skeletal muscle stem cells, eIF2α phosphorylation promotes quiescence and stem cell maintenance (Zismanov et al., 2016) Interestingly, compared to the control cells, Rps12KO/+ cKit+ bone marrow progenitor cells show decreased levels of p-eIF2α (Figure 7I), which also correlates with increased translation.

Heterozygous post-natal loss of Rps12 in the bone marrow impairs translation in HSCs and progenitors and leads to pancytopenia

To better understand the effects of Rps12 deletion in HSCs, we generated a conditional knock-out model Rps12flox/+; Tal1-Cre-ERT, in which Rps12 is excised specifically in hematopoietic cells upon tamoxifen (TAM) treatment. We induced Rps12 deletion by tamoxifen injection in young adult mice and assessed changes in the peripheral blood and bone marrow at 7-, 12- and 14-weeks post TAM injection (Figure 8A). Rps12 deletion by tamoxifen injection in young adult mice is present at 2- and 7-weeks post excision, as demonstrated by the presence of DNA fragment of 300 bp compared to the full WT length of 900 bp (Figure 8—figure supplement 1A). At 7 weeks post Rps12 excision, there were no significant changes in peripheral blood counts (Figure 8—figure supplement 1B), in bone marrow cell counts, or by the absolute number of progenitor and stem cell populations in the bone marrow (Figure 8—figure supplement 1C). Additionally, there was no difference in translation levels in bone marrow HSPCs, measured using the OPP incorporation assay (Figure 8—figure supplement 1D). At 12 weeks post Rps12 deletion, there were no changes in peripheral blood counts, total bone marrow cellularity, or in stem and progenitor cell populations in the bone marrow (Figure 8B and C). At that time point, however, OPP incorporation was significantly decreased in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, indicating decreased translation (Figure 8D). We did not observe any significant differences in the cell cycle profile of HSPCs at this time point (Figure 8—figure supplement 1E). At 14 weeks post Rps12 deletion, we began to observe mild pancytopenia (Figure 8E), a significant decrease in bone marrow cellularity, a decrease in HSC numbers, and a trend toward decreased progenitor populations (Figure 8F). We did not observe any significant differences in OPP incorporation in HSPCs at this time point (Figure 8—figure supplement 1F). These data suggest that the effect of Rps12 loss upon excision in adult hematopoietic cells is decreased translation, then decreases in HSCs maintenance and quiescence, resulting in decreased BM cellularity and pancytopenia.

Figure 8. Heterozygous loss of Rps12 in the hematopoietic cells impairs translation in the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and leads to pancytopenia.

(A) Schematic representation of the time-course analysis testing the effect of the heterozygous loss of Rps12 activity in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). (B–D) Analysis of Rps12flox/+; Tal1-Cre-ERT (Rps12flox/+) and Rps12flox/+(CNTRL) at 12 weeks post tamoxifen treatment (TAM): (B) Peripheral blood cell analysis, (C) quantification of bone marrow cellularity and absolute cell count of bone marrow populations per femur, (D) representative flow histograms, and quantification of the median OPP intensity in bone marrow populations. (E) Peripheral blood cell analysis at 14 weeks and (F) quantification of bone marrow cellularity and absolute cell count of bone marrow populations per femur. (G) Schematic summary of the phenotypic analysis of mouse models. Immunophenotypic populations were defined as follows: MPROG: LincKit+Sca1, LSK: LincKit+Sca1+; MPP3,2: LincKit+Sca1+Flk2CD48+, HSCs: LincKit+Sca1+Flk2CD48. Statistical analysis: quantifications represent mean +/− SEM, shown as the error bars. Significance was determined using the Welch’s t-test *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01. At each time point n (Rps12flox/+)=5 and n (CNTRL)=5. Schematics created with BioRender.

Figure 8—source data 1. Conditional KO hematopoietic populations.

Figure 8.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1. Heterozygous loss of Rps12 in the hematopoietic cells.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1.

(A–D) Analysis of Rps12flox/+; Tal1-Cre-ERT (Rps12flox/+) and Rps12flox/+ (CNTRL) at 7 weeks post heterozygous Rps12 excision with tamoxifen (TAM): (A) Peripheral blood excision analysis at 2 and 7 weeks post TAM treatment. (B) Peripheral blood cell analysis, (C) quantification of bone marrow cellularity and absolute cell count of bone marrow populations per femur, (D) representative flow histograms and quantification of the median o-propargyl puromycin (OPP) intensity in bone marrow populations. (E) Cell cycle analysis of bone marrow populations at 12 weeks post TAM treatment. (F) Representative flow histograms and quantification of the median OPP intensity in bone marrow populations at 14 weeks post TAM treatment. Immunophenotypic populations were defined as follows: MPROG: LincKit+Sca1, LSK: LincKit+Sca1+; MPP3,2: LincKit+Sca1+Flk2CD48+, HSCs: LincKit+Sca1+Flk2CD48. Significance was determined using the Welch’s t-test ns ≥0.05. At each time point n=5 for both cohorts Rps12flox/+ and CNTRL.
Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Analysis of Rps12 SCL-CRE excised hematopoietic progenitors.

Discussion

We generated an Rps12 knock-out mouse and describe the homozygous and heterozygous mutant phenotypes. Homozygous loss of Rps12 was lethal during early embryogenesis. Heterozygous mice were viable with visible phenotypes and blood cell defects. Although the Rps12 locus is unusual in Drosophila, in not exhibiting any haploinsufficient phenotype, and in playing a special role during cell competition, Rps12 heterozygous mutant mice resembled mice mutants for other Rp genes in reduced body size, skeletal defects, and anemia. We also found that Rps12 is required for erythroid differentiation. Some of the mice also exhibited hydrocephalus. Because aspects of the Rps12 mutant phenotype resemble those of mice mutant for other Rp genes, including defective erythropoiesis, Rps12 may also be a candidate gene for DBA (see below). Other Rps12 functions that have been suggested in mammalian cells and cancers could now be explored using this conditional knock-out model with tissue-specific Cre-drivers (Derenzini et al., 2019; Brumwell et al., 2020; Katanaev et al., 2020).

Most strikingly, we report that Rps12 is also crucial for normal hematopoietic stem cell maintenance, with defective engraftment and long-term repopulation of Rps12KO/+ bone marrow in transplantation experiments. This seems specific to adult HSCs, as no hematopoietic defect was observed in the fetal livers of Rps12KO/+ embryos. Although we have not determined whether the transition from the fetal liver to the bone marrow occurs normally, a defect then would only be expected to delay bone marrow engraftment, and does not seem sufficient to explain the chronically defective HSC function and striking loss of HSC quiescence observed in Rps12KO/+ adult mice. The loss of bone marrow HSC quiescence was associated with chronic activation of Akt/MTOR and Erk, increased translation, and HSC apoptosis. Chronic activation of the AKT/MTOR pathway has been shown to result in increased HSC cycling, apoptosis, and decreased self-renewal (Chen et al., 2008; Kharas et al., 2010), which could explain the HSPC exhaustion phenotype and increased HSPC apoptosis in Rps12KO/+ mice.

The increase in HSPC-specific global translation upon heterozygous embryonic deletion of Rps12 is the opposite of what has been reported in Rpl24Bst/+ and Rps14+/- (Signer et al., 2014; Schneider et al., 2016), although there are other Rp genotypes where HSC cycling is increased (Terzian et al., 2011; Schneider et al., 2016). However, it is consistent with the increased translation that has been reported in mice with deletion of Pten in HSCs, which leads to activation of the AKT/MTOR pathway (Signer et al., 2014). Such an increase would in fact be expected as a result of the striking activation of the AKT/MTOR and ERK pathways. Rps12KO/+ c-Kit+ hematopoietic progenitors also have lower phosphorylated eIF2α, which would also predict higher translation levels. Importantly, however, detailed studies of Rps12 depletion from ribosomes in yeast clearly demonstrate a strong reduction in translation (Martín-Villanueva et al., 2020).

Inducible, conditional post-natal deletion of Rps12 in hematopoietic cells revealed a sequence of events over time (summarized in (Figure 8G)). Loss of Rps12 in adult hematopoietic cells led to decreased translation in HSPCs, and then a decreasing HSC pool over time, with decreased BM cellularity and pancytopenia, but no significant effects on HSC quiescence. Thus, it appears that initially Rps12 is required to maintain translation levels in the adult hematopoietic system. The more complicated phenotype of the full-body Rps12KO/+ mouse may reflect an earlier developmental effect on the BM, and a potential effect on the BM microenvironment. Furthermore, this phenotype could reflect compensatory changes due to loss of HSC maintenance, reflected in the observed increases in MTOR signaling, translation, and HSC cycling.

The fact that Rps12KO/+ mice exhibit fully-penetrant pancytopenia with a severe bone marrow failure phenotype, in addition to the erythropoiesis defect, raises the possibility that Rps12 might not have been found mutated in DBA patients due to a more severe human phenotype of Rps12 mutation that is not classified as DBA. Perhaps only a hypomorphic Rps12 genotype would be associated with DBA. While caution is required extrapolating from mouse phenotypes to humans, our study nevertheless raises the possibility that Rps12 could in fact be a candidate gene not only for DBA, but for a broader group of bone marrow failure disorders. One reason that genetic alterations in Rps12 have not yet been reported in DBA or other bone marrow failure disorders could be that Rps12 is not included in the most common targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels used in the diagnosis of these disorders, some of which report molecular diagnostic rates of only 44–59% (Ghemlas et al., 2015; Muramatsu et al., 2017; Gálvez et al., 2021). We suggest that Rps12 should be included in expanded NGS panels for bone marrow failure disorders or should be sequenced in patients in whom there are no molecular findings in the standard NGS panels.

Methods

Key resources table.

Reagent type (species) or resource Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional information
Genetic reagent (Mus musculus) C57BL/6 J The Jackson Laboratory RRID:IMSR_JAX:000664
Genetic reagent (Mus musculus) EIIa-Cre (FVB/N-Tg(EIIa-cre)C5379Lmgd/J) The Jackson Laboratory RRID:IMSR_JAX:003724
Genetic reagent
(Mus musculus)
B6.SJL-Ptprca/
BoyAiTac (CD45.1)
The Jackson Laboratory RRID:IMSR_JAX:002014
Genetic reagent (Mus musculus) RpS12flox/flox This study Rps12em1Nbakr MGI:6388411 Generated for this study
Genetic reagent (Mus musculus) Scl-Cre-ER The Jackson Laboratory RRID:IMSR_JAX:037466
Genetic reagent (Mus musculus) RpS12flox/+; Scl-Cre-ER This study Generated for this study
Antibody Rat monoclonal CD16/CD32 BD biosciences Cat # 553142 Clone: 2.4G2
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody APC-Cy7 Rat anti-mouse monoclonal Gr1 BD biosciences Cat # 557661 Clone: RB6-8C5
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody PE rat anti-mouse
monoclonal Mac1
BioLegend Cat # 101208 Clone: M1/70
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody Alexa Fluor 700 Rat
anti-Mouse monoclonal B220
BD biosciences Cat # 557957 Clone: RA3-6B2
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody APC Rat Anti-Mouse
monoclonal Thy1.2
BD biosciences Cat # 553007 Clone: 53–2.1
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody FITC Mouse Anti-Mouse monoclonal CD45.1 BD biosciences Cat # 553775 Clone: A20
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody PE/Dazzle 594 mouse anti-mouse monoclonal CD45.2 BioLegend Cat # 109845 Clone:104
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody CD3e hamster
monoclonal, Biotin,
eBioscience Cat # 13003182 Clone: 145–2 C11
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody CD4 rat Monoclonal, Biotin, eBioscience Cat #13004182 Clone: GK1.5
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody CD8a rat Monoclonal, Biotin, eBioscience Cat # 13008182 Clone: 53–6.7
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody Gr1 rat Monoclonal, Biotin, eBioscience Cat # 13593182 Clone: RB68C5
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody B220 rat Monoclonal, Biotin, eBioscience Cat # 13045282 Clone: RA3-6B2
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody CD19 mouse
Monoclonal, Biotin,
eBioscience Cat # 13019182 Clone: MB 19–1
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody Ter119 rat
Monoclonal, Biotin,
eBioscience Cat # 13592182 Clone: TER119
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody PE/Cyanine7 rat anti-mouse monoclonal Sca-1 BioLegend Cat #108114 Clone: D7
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody APC Rat Anti-Mouse
monoclonal cKit
BD Biosciences Cat #553356 Clone:2B8
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody PE Rat Anti-Mouse
monoclonal FCRg
Thermo Fisher Cat # 12-0161-82 Clone: 93
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody eFluor 450 Rat Anti-Mouse monoclonal CD34 Thermo Fisher Cat #48-0341-80 Clone:RAM34
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody Brilliant Violet 421 Rat
anti-Mouse monoclonal CD150
BD Biosciences Cat #562811 Clone: Q38-480
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody Alexa Fluor 700 hamster
anti-mouse monoclonal CD48
BioLegend Cat #103426 Clone: HM48-1
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody PE/Cyanine5 Rat anti-mouse monoclonal Flk-2 BioLegend Cat #135312 Clone: A2F10
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody Brilliant Violet 605 mouse anti-mouse monoclonal CD45.2 BioLegend Cat #109841 Clone: 104
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody PerCP/Cyanine5.5 rat anti-mouse monoclonal IL-7Rα BioLegend Cat #135021 Clone: A7R34
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Other Streptavidin-APC-Cy7 BD Biosciences Cat # 554063 second-step reagent for cells
stained with biotinylated
primary antibodies
Antibody PE anti-mouse monoclonal Flk-2 BioLegend Cat # 135306 Clone: A2F10
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Commercial assay, kit FITC Annexin V BD Biosciences Cat # 560931 Apoptosis detection:
Phosphatidylserine probe
Commercial assay, kit Propidium Iodide BD Biosciences Cat # 556463 Apoptosis detection:
Staining Solution
Antibody pS6 (Ser235/236) Alexa 488
rabbit monoclonal
Cell Signaling Cat # 4803 S Clone: D57.2.2E
ICFC (1:50)
Antibody pERK1 (T202/Y204)
Alexa 488 mouse
monoclonal
Cell Signaling Cat # 4374 Clone: E10
ICFC (1:20)
Antibody pAkt (Ser473) AF647
rabbit monoclonal
Cell Signaling Cat # 2337 Clone: 193H12
ICFC (1:20)
Antibody p4E-BP1 (Thr37/46) rabbit monoclonal AF647 Cell Signaling Cat # 5123 Clone: 236B4
ICFC (1:20)
Antibody FITC Mouse monoclonal
Anti-Ki-67
BD Biosciences Cat # 556026
RRID: AB_396302
Clone: B56
(1 µl per 107 cells)
other Hoechst 33342 Solution BD Biosciences Cat # 561908 See legend to Figure 6
Commercial assay, kit Click-iT Plus OPP Alexa Fluor 488 Thermo Fisher Cat # C10456 Protein Synthesis Assay Kit
Antibody APC rat anti-mouse
monoclonal TER-119
BioLegend Cat # 116211 Clone: TER119
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Antibody PE rat anti-Mouse
monoclonal CD71
BD biosciences Cat # 561937 Clone: C2
(1 µl per 107 cells)
Sequence-based reagent gRNA 1 This study PCR primer CGCAGTAGACACGCTATCGCCGG
Sequence-based reagent gRNA 2 This study PCR primer GTGGGTTGCTGTGTGGATCGGGG
Sequence-
based reagent
F1 This study PCR primer GCACATGCGCACAGAAGT
Sequence-
based reagent
R1 This study PCR primer CGGACTATCTATCCCCACGA
Sequence-based reagent F2 This study PCR primer GTACAGCTATCTGCCAGGAA
Sequence-
based reagent
R2 This study PCR primer CGAGGTCGACGGTATCG
Sequence-
based reagent
F3 This study PCR primer CGATACCGTCGACCTCG
Sequence-
based reagent
R3 This study PCR primer GTGCTAGCAACAGAAGGTTC
Sequence-
based reagent
F4 This study PCR primer GTCTCAATACTGTGGGGTGT
Commercial
assay, kit
Cytofix/Cytoperm BD biosciences Cat # BDB554714 Fixation/Permeabilization
Solution Kit
Commercial
assay, kit
DNeasy kit Qiagen Cat #69504 DNA extraction kit
Chemical
compound, drug
mSCF Peprotech Cat # 250–03 Cytokine
Other MethoCult GF M3434 Stem Cell Technologies Cat # 03434 Methylcellulose media
Other MethoCult M3334 Stem Cell Technologies Cat # 03334 Methylcellulose media
Other CD117 MicroBeads,
mouse
Miltenyi Biotec Cat #130-091-224 See ‘Western blot analysis’
in methods section
Other LS Column Miltenyi Biotec Cat # 130-042-401 Separation column
Antibody RpS12, rabbit polyclonal Proteintech Cat # 16490–1-AP 1:1000
Antibody β-Actin (13E5) Rabbit
monoclonal mAb
Cell Signaling Cat # 4970 1:1000
Antibody eIF2α (D7D3) Rabbit
monoclonal mAb
Cell Signaling Cat # 5324 1:1000
Antibody phospho-eIF2α (Ser52) rabbit polyclonal Thermo Scientific Cat # BS-4842R 1:1000
Commercial
assay, kit
miRNA First-
Strand
Synthesis Kit
Takara Bio Cat # 638313
Commercial
assay, kit
mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit Thermo Fisher Cat # AM1560
Other Power SYBR Green
Master Mix
Applied Biosystems Cat # 4367659 PCR reaction mix

Mice

All animals were housed at the Animal Housing and Studies Facility at Albert Einstein College of Medicine (AECOM) under pathogen-free conditions and experiments were performed following protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (Protocol #20181206). C57BL/6 J and EIIa-Cre (FVB/N-Tg(EIIa-Cre)C5379Lmgd/J) mice were obtained from Jackson. B6.SJL-Ptprca/BoyAiTac (CD45.1) mice from Taconic were used for transplantation experiments. To generate Rps12KO/+ mice, we crossed Rps12flox/flox to EIIa-Cre mice and used primers flanking the floxed region to identify progeny where recombination had occurred. Unless indicated, these mice were kept as heterozygous by crossing them with C57BL/6 J, and the presence of the EIIa-Cre transgene was crossed out. In each case, the genotypes were confirmed by PCR using genomic DNA extracted from tails using a DNeasy kit from Qiagen (#69504). Peripheral blood samples were collected via facial vein bleeding under isoflurane anesthesia, and blood counts were obtained using the Genesis analyzer (Oxford Science). To generate growth curves, 5-day-old pups were genotyped and numbered by cutting toes. Pups’ weight was measured daily from day 5–21 of age.

Generation of Rps12flox knock-in mice

A pair of guide-RNAs (gRNAs) targeting intron 1 and intron 3 of the Rps12 gene, respectively were designed by an online tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/) and generated by in vitro transcription. Cas9 mRNA was purchased from SBI. An Rps12 conditional knockout homology-directed repair (HDR) plasmid containing 2 kb homologous arms at each side and exons 2 and 3 flanked by loxP sites (Figure 1—figure supplement 1) was generated by SLiCE cloning. Super ovulated female C57BL/6 J mice (3–4 weeks old) were mated to C57BL/6 J males, and fertilized embryos were collected from oviducts. The gRNAs, Cas9 mRNA and conditional knockout HDR plasmid were microinjected into the cytoplasm of fertilized eggs. The injected zygotes were transferred into pseudo-pregnant CD1 females and the resulting pups were genotyped. Out of 20 pups, two mice were identified as Rps12flox/+, which were then crossed to obtain Rps12flox/flox (Rps12em1Nbakr MGI:6388411). The corresponding DNA sequences can be found in the Key Resources Table.

Generation of the Rps12KO knock-out mutation

Rps12flox/flox mice were mated to EIIA-Cre mice for excision during embryogenesis, the F1 generation carrying the potential Rps12 excision bred with C57BL/6 J mice, and the F2 generation genotyped to identify Rps12KO/+ mice lacking EIIA-Cre.

Generation of Rps12flox/+; Tal1-Cre-ERT mice

Rps12flox/flox mice were mated to the Tal1-ERT-Cre mice and F1 generation of Rps12flox/+; Tal1-Cre-ERT mice. 6–8 weeks old animals were treated with three doses of tamoxifen (3 × 4 mg/mouse) to achieve the Rps12 excision.

Preparation of single-cell suspensions

Bone marrow single-cell suspension was prepared from freshly harvested femurs, tibiae, ilia, and vertebrae by gentle crushing of the bones in phosphate-buffered saline containing 2% fetal bovine serum (PBS/2% FBS) followed by filtration through a 40 µm strainer. Spleen cells were obtained from freshly harvested spleens. Single-cell suspension was prepared by dissociating spleens using the flat end of a plunger against 40 µm strainers and washed with PBS/2% FBS. Fetal liver single cell suspension was prepared from freshly harvested E13.5 fetal livers by passing through a 200 µl pipet tip and filtered through a 40 µm strainer in PBS/2% FBS. Cells were subjected to RBC lysis (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and used for the further steps described below. To calculate the absolute number of cells per femur one femur per mouse was flushed, RBC lysed and cells counted to obtain the total number of cells per femur.

Flow cytometry on live cells

Bone marrow

Single-cell bone marrow suspensions were stained with a cocktail of biotin-conjugated lineage antibodies for 30 min at 4 °C, washed with PBS/2% FBS, stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibody cocktails for 30 min at 4 °C, washed with PBS/2% FBS, resuspended in PBS/2% FBS, filtered through a 40 µm strainer, and subjected to Flow analysis. For the antibody panels, refer to Supplementary file 1.

Peripheral blood

samples were subjected to RBC lysis, blocked with CD16/CD32 10 min at 4 °C followed by staining with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies, washed with PBS/2% FBS, resuspended in PBS/2% FBS, filtered through a 40 µm strainer and subjected to Flow analysis. For the antibody panels, refer to Supplementary file 1.

Erythropoiesis analysis

Obtained single cell suspension of spleen cells (without RBC lysis) was blocked with CD16/CD32 for 10 min at 4 °C and stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for 30 min at 4 °C (Supplementary file 1). E13.5 fetal livers single cell suspension was blocked with CD16/CD32 10 min at 4 °C and stained with erythropoiesis or progenitor panels as described above. All blocking and staining steps were performed in PBS/2% FBS.

Apoptosis analysis

Single-cell suspension samples were stained with the lineage-cocktail and fluorochrome-conjugated antibody cocktails as described above. After completion of surface antibody staining, samples were incubated with FITC-conjugated Annexin V (BD-560931) and Propidium Iodide (BD-556463) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

All flow cytometry was performed with BD FACS LSRII or Cytek Aurora and data analysis was done with FlowJo Software (v9, v10).

Flow cytometry on fixed cells

Cell cycle

Fresh single-cell suspension of the RBC lysed bone marrow cells was stained with lineage antibodies followed by staining with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies against surface markers, as described above. Immediately after staining cells were fixed and permeabilized using Cytofix/Cytoperm Fixation/Permeabilization Solution Kit (BD biosciences, BDB554714) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Following fixation, cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with FITC-conjugated Ki67 antibody in Perm/Wash buffer. DNA was stained with 25 µl/ml Hoechst in Perm/Wash buffer before flow cytometry analysis. Flow cytometry was performed with BD FACS LSRII or Cytek Aurora and data analysis was done with FlowJo Software (v9, v10).

Global translation in vitro

protocol was based on a previously described assay (Signer et al., 2014). Single-cell bone marrow RBC lysed cell suspension was obtained as described. Cells were resuspended in DMEM (Corning 10–013-CV) media supplemented with 50 µM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma) and 20 µM OPP (Thermo Scientific C10456). Cells were incubated for 45 min at 37 °C and then washed with Ca2+ and Mg2+ free PBS. The samples were stained with biotin-labeled antibodies, followed by staining with fluorochrome-conjugated antibody cocktails, fixed and permeabilized using Cytofix/Cytoperm as described above. After permeabilization with Perm/Wash buffer, cells were resuspended in Click-iT Plus Reaction Cocktail (Thermo Scientific C10456) containing azide conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 for 30 min at room temperature, washed once with Click-iT Reaction Rinse Buffer and resuspended in Perm/Wash buffer. Flow cytometry was performed with Cytek Aurora and data analysis was done with FlowJo Software (v9, v10).

Phospho-flow cytometry

Bone marrow cells were starved for 1 hr in IMDM 2% FBS at 37 °C, stained with lineage antibodies, followed by staining with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies against surface markers, as described above. Post-staining cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml mSCF (Peprotech #250–03) in 2% PBS-FBS for 5 min at 37 °C. Stained and stimulated cells were fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm as described above and stained with phospho-S6 (Ser235/236) - Alexa 488 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4803 S) (1:100) and phospho-AKT (Ser473) - Alexa647 (Cell Signaling Technology, 2337 S), phospho-4E-BP1 (Thr37/46) - Alexa Fluor647 -(Cell Signaling Technology, 5123 S) of pERK1(T202/Y204) - Alexa 488 (Cell Signaling 4374) at 1:20 dilutions. Cells were washed with Perm/Wash buffer to remove residual and unbound antibodies, and resuspended in fresh Perm/Wash buffer, followed by flow cytometry analysis on the Cytek Aurora. Analysis of all flow cytometry data was performed using FlowJo software (v9, v10).

Methylcellulose cultures and serial re-plating

Single-cell bone marrow suspensions (post RBC lysis) or single-cell fetal liver cell suspensions (without RBC lysis) were resuspended in RPMI media supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were manually counted on a hemocytometer using Trypan blue and plated in methylcellulose media (M3434 or M3334, Stem Cell Technologies) at a density of 5 × 105 live cells/ml (in M3434) or 104 live cells/ml (in M3334) in 35 mm cell culture plates. Samples were incubated at 37 °C in 6.5% CO2 at constant humidity. Colonies were scored and evaluated 7–10 days after plating. To replate, cells were washed from the plates with RMPI media, counted, and re-plated in fresh M3334 methylcellulose at a density of 104 live cells/dish in 35 mm plates. This process was repeated until cell exhaustion in one of the experimental groups.

Bone marrow transplantation

6- to 8-weeks-old B6.SJL (CD45.1) recipient mice were lethally irradiated with a single dose of 950 Gy using a Cesium-137 gamma-ray irradiator (Mark I irradiator Model 68) at least 3 hr before transplantation. For non-competitive assays, 106 whole bone marrow cells from a donor control (Rps12flox/flox or Rps12flox/+) or Rps12KO/+ mouse (CD45.2) were injected into the retro-orbital venous sinus of recipient mice under isoflurane anesthesia. For competitive transplants, 105 whole bone marrow cells from control Rps12flox/+ or Rps12KO/+ donor mouse (CD45.2), and 105 competitor cells from a B6.SJL (CD45.1) mouse were injected into each recipient mouse. Mice were given drinking water treated with 100 mg/ml Baytril100 (Bayer) for 3 weeks after transplantation. Peripheral blood was collected every 4 weeks and animals were euthanized at the specified experimental time points.

Western blot analysis

Whole bone marrow cells were enriched for cKit + cells using CD117 MicroBeads and MACS LS Columns (Miltenyi Biotec 130-091-224 and 130-042-401) following the manufacturer’s protocol. 2 × 106 cKit enriched cells were resuspended in 150 µl Laemmli buffer (BioRad 1610737) supplemented with 1:10 β-mercaptoethanol, passed through a 25 G needle to break the DNA and incubated at 95 °C for 5 min. An equal amount of each sample was separated in polyacrylamide gels (BioRad 4568081), transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Licor), and blocked (Licor 927–90001). IRDye near-infrared secondary antibodies (Licor) were used to visualize the proteins. The following primary antibodies were used: RpS12 (Proteintech; polyclonal), β-actin (Cell Signaling; 13E5), eIF2α (Cell signaling, 5324T), phospho-eIF2α (Thermo Scientific; Ser52; polyclonal).

RNA extraction, RT-qPCR, and bioanalyzer analysis

Total RNA was extracted from 2 × 106 cKit enriched cells (isolated using CD117 MicroBeads as previously described) with mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher AM1560) following the manufacturer’s instructions for the isolation of total RNA. Final RNA concentration was determined using a NanoDrop Mircrovolume Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). For RT-qPCR, cDNA synthesis was performed using 405 ng of total RNA and the Mir-X miRNA First-Strand Synthesis Kit (Takara Bio 638313) as recommended by the manufacturer. cDNA samples were analyzed, in duplicates, using Power SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems 4367659) in an Applied Biosystems StepOne Real-Time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems 4376357). For mRNA analysis, GAPDH, HPRT1, and RER1 mRNA levels were used as internal controls, and for snoRNA analysis, U6, Sno202, and Sno234, small RNAs were used as internal controls.

Histology

Peripheral blood smears and cytospins from RBC lysed bone marrow samples were stained using the Hema 3 System (Fisher) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The images were acquired using a Zeiss Axiovert microscope with a digital camera.

Statistical methods

Two-tailed Student’s t-tests were performed to compare the statistical significance between the two samples. When comparing more than two groups, one-way ANOVA tests were performed with the Turkey’s multiple comparison test. For the presence/absence of phenotype, statistical significance was calculated with Fisher’s exact test. Analysis was done using GraphPad Prism v9.

Reagents

All antibodies used for flow cytometry assays, and primers used for CRISPR gene editing and PCR can be found in Supplementary file 1 and the Key Resources Table. Other reagents are mentioned in the methods section and Key Resources Table.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01GM104213 (to NEB), R01CA196973 (to KG), R56DK130895 (to KG), R01DK130895 (to KG), an award from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine Human Genetics Program (to NEB), startup funds from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Albert Einstein Cancer Center (to KG), the NHLBI/NIH Ruth L Kirschstein National Research Service Award F32HL146119 (to KA), and the IRACDA/BETTR training Institutional Research and Academic Career Development Award 2K12GH102779-07A1 (to KA). For flow cytometry this work utilized the analyzers Cytek Aurora Multiparameter Flow Cytometer and BD LSR-II with the help of Dr. Jinghang Zhang, Dr. Yu Zhang, and Aodengtuya Fnu. The Cytek Aurora Multiparameter Flow Cytometer was purchased with funding from the National Institutes of Health SIG grant #1S10OD026833-01. Data in this paper are from a thesis to be submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Biomedical Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Kira Gritsman, Email: kira.gritsman@einsteinmed.org.

Nicholas E Baker, Email: nicholas.baker@einsteinmed.edu.

Michael Buszczak, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States.

Richard M White, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences R01GM104213 to Nicholas E Baker.

  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases R56DK130895 to Kira Gritsman.

  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases R01DK130895 to Kira Gritsman.

  • National Institutes of Health F32HL146119 to Kristina Ames.

  • National Institutes of Health 2K12GH102779 to Kristina Ames.

  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine Human Genetics Program to Kira Gritsman.

  • National Institutes of Health R01CA196973 to Kira Gritsman.

  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences IRACDA/BETTR training Institutional Research and Academic Career Development Award 2K12GH102779-07A1 to Kristina Ames.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

has received research funding from iOnctura, SA, and ADC Therapeutics.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft.

Investigation.

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Protocol #20181206). All procedures were performed under isoflurane anesthesia to minimize animal suffering.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Antibodies used for flow cytometry panels of peripheral blood and bone marrow samples.

This file contains a list of all the biotinylated and fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies used in both live and fixed cell samples used in the experiments described in this paper. The antibodies are grouped by flow cytometry panel and include clone name as well as the manufacturer and catalog number information for ease of use and reproducibility. Additional information on antibody concentration used for staining can be found in the ‘Key Resources Table.’

elife-69322-supp1.xlsx (18.1KB, xlsx)
Transparent reporting form

Data availability

There are no large-scale datasets associated with this paper. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

References

  1. Baker NE. Emerging mechanisms of cell competition. Nature Reviews. Genetics. 2020;21:683–697. doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-0262-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boulan L, Andersen D, Colombani J, Boone E, Léopold P. Inter-organ growth coordination is mediated by the Xrp1-Dilp8 axis in Drosophila. Developmental Cell. 2019;49:811–818. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brumwell A, Fell L, Obress L, Uniacke J. Hypoxia influences Polysome distribution of human Ribosomal protein S12 and alternative splicing of Ribosomal protein mRNAs. RNA. 2020;26:361–371. doi: 10.1261/rna.070318.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cabezas-Wallscheid N, Buettner F, Sommerkamp P, Klimmeck D, Ladel L, Thalheimer FB, Pastor-Flores D, Roma LP, Renders S, Zeisberger P, Przybylla A, Schönberger K, Scognamiglio R, Altamura S, Florian CM, Fawaz M, Vonficht D, Tesio M, Collier P, Pavlinic D, Geiger H, Schroeder T, Benes V, Dick TP, Rieger MA, Stegle O, Trumpp A. Vitamin A-retinoic acid signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell dormancy. Cell. 2017;169:807–823. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen C, Liu Y, Liu R, Ikenoue T, Guan KL, Liu Y, Zheng P. TSC-mTOR maintains Quiescence and function of hematopoietic stem cells by repressing mitochondrial Biogenesis and reactive oxygen species. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2008;205:2397–2408. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clavería C, Torres M. Cell competition: mechanisms and physiological roles. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 2016;32:411–439. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. de la Cruz J, Karbstein K, Woolford JL. Functions of Ribosomal proteins in assembly of Eukaryotic Ribosomes in vivo. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2015;84:93–129. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Derenzini E, Agostinelli C, Rossi A, Rossi M, Scellato F, Melle F, Motta G, Fabbri M, Diop F, Kodipad AA, Chiappella A, Vitolo U, Gaidano G, Tarella C, Pileri S. Genomic alterations of Ribosomal protein genes in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. British Journal of Haematology. 2019;185:330–334. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fonseca BD, Smith EM, Yelle N, Alain T, Bushell M, Pause A. The ever-evolving role of mTOR in translation. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 2014;36:102–112. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gálvez E, Vallespín E, Arias-Salgado EG, Sánchez-Valdepeñas C, Giménez Y, Navarro S, Río P, Bogliolo M, Pujol R, Peiró M, Nevado J, Zubicaray J, Sebastián E, Catalá A, Beléndez C, Díaz de Heredia C, Galera A, Badell I, Madero L, Perona R, Sastre L, Surrallés J, Bueren J, Lapunzina P, Sevilla J. Next-generation sequencing in bone marrow failure syndromes and isolated Cytopenias: experience of the Spanish network on bone marrow failure syndromes. HemaSphere. 2021;5:e539. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Geiger T, Wehner A, Schaab C, Cox J, Mann M. Comparative Proteomic analysis of eleven common cell lines reveals ubiquitous but varying expression of most proteins. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2012;11:M111. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.014050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gentilella A, Kozma SC, Thomas G. A liaison between mTOR signaling, Ribosome Biogenesis and cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2015;1849:812–820. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2015.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ghemlas I, Li H, Zlateska B, Klaassen R, Fernandez CV, Yanofsky RA, Wu J, Pastore Y, Silva M, Lipton JH, Brossard J, Michon B, Abish S, Steele M, Sinha R, Belletrutti M, Breakey VR, Jardine L, Goodyear L, Sung L, Dhanraj S, Reble E, Wagner A, Beyene J, Ray P, Meyn S, Cada M, Dror Y. Improving diagnostic precision, care and syndrome definitions using comprehensive next-generation sequencing for the inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2015;52:575–584. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hidalgo San Jose L, Sunshine MJ, Dillingham CH, Chua BA, Kruta M, Hong Y, Hatters DM, Signer RAJ. Modest declines in Proteome quality impair hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Reports. 2020;30:69–80. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jaako P, Flygare J, Olsson K, Quere R, Ehinger M, Henson A, Ellis S, Schambach A, Baum C, Richter J, Larsson J, Bryder D, Karlsson S. Mice with Ribosomal protein S19 deficiency develop bone marrow failure and symptoms like patients with Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Blood. 2011;118:6087–6096. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-371963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ji Z, Kiparaki M, Folgado V, Kumar A, Blanco J, Rimesso G, Chuen J, Liu Y, Zheng D, Baker NE. Drosophila Rps12 controls translation, growth, and cell competition through Xrp1. PLOS Genetics. 2019;15:e1008513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kale A, Ji Z, Kiparaki M, Blanco J, Rimesso G, Flibotte S, Baker NE. Ribosomal protein S12E has a distinct function in cell competition. Developmental Cell. 2018;44:42–55. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Katanaev VL, Kryuchkov M, Averkov V, Savitsky M, Nikolaeva K, Klimova N, Khaustov S, Solis GP. Humanafly: high-throughput Transgenesis and expression of breast cancer transcripts in Drosophila eye discovers the Rps12-Wingless signaling axis. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:21013. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77942-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kazerounian S, Ciarlini P, Yuan D, Ghazvinian R, Alberich-Jorda M, Joshi M, Zhang H, Beggs AH, Gazda HT. Development of soft tissue Sarcomas in Ribosomal proteins L5 and S24 heterozygous mice. Journal of Cancer. 2016;7:32–36. doi: 10.7150/jca.13292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kharas MG, Okabe R, Ganis JJ, Gozo M, Khandan T, Paktinat M, Gilliland DG, Gritsman K. Constitutively active AKT depletes hematopoietic stem cells and induces leukemia in mice. Blood. 2010;115:1406–1415. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-229443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kondrashov N, Pusic A, Stumpf CR, Shimizu K, Hsieh AC, Ishijima J, Shiroishi T, Barna M. Ribosome-mediated specificity in Hox mRNA translation and vertebrate tissue Patterning. Cell. 2011;145:383–397. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Krieg J, Hofsteenge J, Thomas G. Identification of the 40 S Ribosomal protein S6 Phosphorylation sites induced by cycloheximide. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1988;263:11473–11477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee JY, Nakada D, Yilmaz OH, Tothova Z, Joseph NM, Lim MS, Gilliland DG, Morrison SJ. mTOR activation induces tumor Suppressors that inhibit Leukemogenesis and deplete hematopoietic stem cells after Pten deletion. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:593–605. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Magee JA, Ikenoue T, Nakada D, Lee JY, Guan KL, Morrison SJ. Temporal changes in PTEN and Mtorc2 regulation of hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and leukemia suppression. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11:415–428. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Magee JA, Signer RAJ. Developmental stage-specific changes in protein synthesis differentially sensitize hematopoietic stem cells and erythroid progenitors to impaired ribosome biogenesis. Stem Cell Reports. 2021;16:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.11.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Martín-Villanueva S, Fernández-Fernández J, Rodríguez-Galán O, Fernández-Boraita J, Villalobo E, de La Cruz J. Role of the 40s beak ribosomal protein Es12 in ribosome biogenesis and function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA Biology. 2020;17:1261–1276. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2020.1767951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Marygold SJ, Roote J, Reuter G, Lambertsson A, Ashburner M, Millburn GH, Harrison PM, Yu Z, Kenmochi N, Kaufman TC, Leevers SJ, Cook KR. The ribosomal protein genes and minute loci of Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biology. 2007;8:R216. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Matsson H, Davey EJ, Draptchinskaia N, Hamaguchi I, Ooka A, Levéen P, Forsberg E, Karlsson S, Dahl N. Targeted disruption of the Ribosomal protein S19 gene is lethal prior to implantation. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2004;24:4032–4037. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.9.4032-4037.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McGowan KA, Li JZ, Park CY, Beaudry V, Tabor HK, Sabnis AJ, Zhang W, Fuchs H, de Angelis MH, Myers RM, Attardi LD, Barsh GS. Ribosomal mutations cause P53-mediated dark skin and pleiotropic effects. Nature Genetics. 2008;40:963–970. doi: 10.1038/ng.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Morata G, Ripoll P. Minutes: Mutants of Drosophila autonomously affecting cell division rate. Developmental Biology. 1975;42:211–221. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(75)90330-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Morgado-Palacin L, Varetti G, Llanos S, Gómez-López G, Martinez D, Serrano M. Partial loss of Rpl11 in adult mice Recapitulates Diamond-Blackfan anemia and promotes Lymphomagenesis. Cell Reports. 2015;13:712–722. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Muramatsu H, Okuno Y, Yoshida K, Shiraishi Y, Doisaki S, Narita A, Sakaguchi H, Kawashima N, Wang X, Xu Y, Chiba K, Tanaka H, Hama A, Sanada M, Takahashi Y, Kanno H, Yamaguchi H, Ohga S, Manabe A, Harigae H, Kunishima S, Ishii E, Kobayashi M, Koike K, Watanabe K, Ito E, Takata M, Yabe M, Ogawa S, Miyano S, Kojima S. Clinical utility of next-generation sequencing for inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. Genetics in Medicine. 2017;19:796–802. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Oliver ER, Saunders TL, Tarlé SA, Glaser T. Ribosomal protein L24 defect in belly spot and tail (Bst), a mouse minute. Development. 2004;131:3907–3920. doi: 10.1242/dev.01268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Petibon C, Malik Ghulam M, Catala M, Abou Elela S. Regulation of Ribosomal protein genes: an ordered anarchy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. RNA. 2021;12:e1632. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pietras EM, Reynaud D, Kang Y-A, Carlin D, Calero-Nieto FJ, Leavitt AD, Stuart JM, Göttgens B, Passegué E. Functionally distinct Subsets of lineage-Biased Multipotent Progenitors control blood production in normal and Regenerative conditions. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rabl J, Leibundgut M, Ataide SF, Haag A, Ban N. Crystal structure of the Eukaryotic 40s Ribosomal subunit in complex with initiation factor 1. Science. 2011;331:730–736. doi: 10.1126/science.1198308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Roux PP, Shahbazian D, Vu H, Holz MK, Cohen MS, Taunton J, Sonenberg N, Blenis J. RAS/ERK signaling promotes site-specific Ribosomal protein S6 Phosphorylation via RSK and stimulates cap-dependent translation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007;282:14056–14064. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700906200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Roux PP, Topisirovic I. Signaling pathways involved in the regulation of mRNA translation. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2018;38:e00070-18. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00070-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Schalm SS, Fingar DC, Sabatini DM, Blenis J. TOS motif-mediated Raptor binding regulates 4E-Bp1 Multisite Phosphorylation and function. Current Biology. 2003;13:797–806. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00329-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schneider RK, Schenone M, Ferreira MV, Kramann R, Joyce CE, Hartigan C, Beier F, Brümmendorf TH, Germing U, Platzbecker U, Büsche G, Knüchel R, Chen MC, Waters CS, Chen E, Chu LP, Novina CD, Lindsley RC, Carr SA, Ebert BL. Rps14 Haploinsufficiency causes a block in erythroid differentiation mediated by S100A8 and S100A9. Nature Medicine. 2016;22:288–297. doi: 10.1038/nm.4047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Signer RAJ, Magee JA, Salic A, Morrison SJ. Haematopoietic stem cells require a highly regulated protein synthesis rate. Nature. 2014;509:49–54. doi: 10.1038/nature13035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sigurdsson V, Miharada K. Regulation of unfolded protein response in hematopoietic stem cells. International Journal of Hematology. 2018;107:627–633. doi: 10.1007/s12185-018-2458-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Socolovsky M, Nam HS, Fleming MD, Haase VH, Brugnara C, Lodish HF. Ineffective Erythropoiesis in Stat5A−/−5B−/− mice due to decreased survival of early erythroblasts. Blood. 2001;98:3261–3273. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.12.3261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sugiyama D, Inoue-Yokoo T, Fraser ST, Kulkeaw K, Mizuochi C, Horio Y. Embryonic regulation of the mouse hematopoietic niche. TheScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:1770–1780. doi: 10.1100/2011/598097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Terzian T, Dumble M, Arbab F, Thaller C, Donehower LA, Lozano G, Justice MJ, Roop DR, Box NF. Rpl27A Mutation in the Sooty foot ataxia mouse Phenocopies high P53 mouse models. The Journal of Pathology. 2011;224:540–552. doi: 10.1002/path.2891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ulirsch JC, Verboon JM, Kazerounian S, Guo MH, Yuan D, Ludwig LS, Handsaker RE, Abdulhay NJ, Fiorini C, Genovese G, Lim ET, Cheng A, Cummings BB, Chao KR, Beggs AH, Genetti CA, Sieff CA, Newburger PE, Niewiadomska E, Matysiak M, Vlachos A, Lipton JM, Atsidaftos E, Glader B, Narla A, Gleizes P-E, O’Donohue M-F, Montel-Lehry N, Amor DJ, McCarroll SA, O’Donnell-Luria AH, Gupta N, Gabriel SB, MacArthur DG, Lander ES, Lek M, Da Costa L, Nathan DG, Korostelev AA, Do R, Sankaran VG, Gazda HT. The genetic landscape of Diamond-Blackfan anemia. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2018;103:930–947. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.10.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Watkins-Chow DE, Cooke J, Pidsley R, Edwards A, Slotkin R, Leeds KE, Mullen R, Baxter LL, Campbell TG, Salzer MC, Biondini L, Gibney G, Phan Dinh Tuy F, Chelly J, Morris HD, Riegler J, Lythgoe MF, Arkell RM, Loreni F, Flint J, Pavan WJ, Keays DA. Mutation of the diamond-Blackfan anemia Gene Rps7 in mouse results in morphological and Neuroanatomical phenotypes. PLOS Genetics. 2013;9:e1003094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wek RC, Jiang HY, Anthony TG. Coping with stress: Eif2 Kinases and Translational control. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2006;34:7–11. doi: 10.1042/BST20060007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wilson DN, Doudna Cate JH. The structure and function of the Eukaryotic Ribosome. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2012;4:a011536. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yilmaz OH, Valdez R, Theisen BK, Guo W, Ferguson DO, Wu H, Morrison SJ. Pten dependence distinguishes haematopoietic stem cells from leukaemia-initiating cells. Nature. 2006;441:475–482. doi: 10.1038/nature04703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yonath A, Franceschi F. Functional universality and evolutionary diversity: insights from the structure of the Ribosome. Structure. 1998;6:679–684. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(98)00069-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zismanov V, Chichkov V, Colangelo V, Jamet S, Wang S, Syme A, Koromilas AE, Crist C. Phosphorylation of Eif2Α is a Translational control mechanism regulating muscle stem cell Quiescence and self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:79–90. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Editor's evaluation

Michael Buszczak 1

This paper shows that haploinsufficiency of the ribosomal protein gene Rps12 in mice results in a number of phenotypes including defects in erythropoiesis, chronic pancytopenia, and loss of hematopoietic stem cell quiescence. This work will significantly add to the growing body of evidence that specific cell populations are particularly sensitive to global changes in mRNA translation. The manuscript contributes to our understanding of ribosome formation and function, mRNA translation, development, and stem cell biology.

Decision letter

Editor: Michael Buszczak1

Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Haploinsufficiency of the essential gene RpS12 causes defects in erythropoiesis and hematopoietic stem cell maintenance" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors, and the evaluation has been overseen by Richard White as the Senior Editor. The reviewers have opted to remain anonymous.

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

1) The authors need to formally exclude the possibility that expression of the small nucleolar genes Snord100 and Snora33, located in Rps12 introns 4 and 5, respectively, is also perturbed by the deletion of Rps12 exon 2. Any change in the expression of these snoRNAs would confound the interpretation that all the described phenotypes map back to Rsp12 specifically. Along these lines, the authors should also provide data to assess the impact of the Rps12 mutation on Rps12 protein expression.

2) Northern blots and/or other molecular assays should be used to characterize the extent to which haploinsufficiency of RpS12 impacts overall ribosome biogenesis. In addition, polysome profiles in the Rps12 mutant animals should be analyzed to assess 40S/60S subunits, 80S monosomes and polysomes.

3) The authors need to devise experiments to distinguish between direct and indirect consequences of Rps12 loss. For example, the authors should examine the extent to which acute loss of Rps12 regulates HSPCs, ribosome biogenesis and assembly, and ribosome composition. Cell proliferation, survival, and protein synthesis rate assays require fewer cells than polysome profiling, and these experiments would begin to provide insights into the direct cellular consequences of Rps12 haploinsufficiency.

These three points cover many of the shared concerns of the reviewers. The authors should do their best to address the individual critiques of each of the reviewers (see below).

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

1) The expression of both snoRNAs should be evaluated in the homozygous and heterozygous mutants. The expression levels of Rps12 protein should also be determined in the heterozygous mutants.

2) Rescue of Rps12 mutant phenotypes by a Rps12 transgene should be conducted, given the probability that the expression of the snoRNAs will be disrupted in the mutant.

3) Northern blots and/or other molecular assays should be used to characterize the extent to which haploinsufficiency of RpS12 impacts overall ribosome biogenesis.

4) Have the authors considered the possibility that loss of Rps12 triggers a feedback loop that promotes ribosome biogenesis? The authors could evaluate nascent rRNA transcription levels as one measure of how the loss of this RP gene impacts ribosome homeostasis.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Key points

1. Have the authors formally excluded the possibility that expression of the small nucleolar genes Snord100 and Snora33, located in Rps12 introns 4 and 5, respectively, is also perturbed by the deletion of Rps12 exon 2 i.e. can they be sure that all the phenotypes are indeed Rps12-dependent?

2. Please provide data to assess the impact of the Rps12 mutation on Rps12 protein expression.

3. It is important to analyze the potential functional consequences of Rps12 deletion on ribosomal subunit assembly. Polysome profiles in the Rps12 mutant animals should be analyzed to assess 40S/60S subunits, 80S monosomes and polysomes. Is there any effect of Rps12 deletion on rRNA processing?

4. To what extent are the observed Rps12 mutant phenotypes indirect consequences of TP53 activation? What is the impact of the Rps12 mutation on TP53 stabilization in the different tissues affected by the mutation?

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

A few key experiments may help elucidate the mechanisms by which Rps12 regulates HSPCs.

1. Since this is a floxed allele, it is possible to induce acute loss of Rps12 (or Rps f/+) in vivo or ex vivo in HSPCs, to study the impact of the acute loss of Rps12. Does Rps12 haploinsufficiency reduce protein synthesis or really increase protein synthesis as shown in this manuscript?

2. Following up on point #1 experiment, polysome profiling will further dissect the role of Rps12 in ribosome biogenesis and assembly.

3. Has this (polysome profiling and signaling transduction) been done in hematopoietic cell line with Rps12 knockdown or CRISPR-mediated deletion of one allele of Rps12? If not, the authors should investigate the role of Rps12 in mammalian hematopoietic cell lines.

4. It is important to devise experiments to distinguish the direct and indirect consequences of Rps12 loss. The ERK/mTOR signaling activation and increases in protein synthesis were consequences, or negative feedback of Rps12 loss?

5. It is important to devise experiments to distinguish the ribosomal and extraribosomal function of Rps12 in mammalian cells.

6. The phenotypes presented in this manuscript showed a strong HSPCs and pan-hematopoietic effects. Erythropoiesis was actually less affected. The narrative and discussion should reflect that, and de-emphasize its role in or similarity to DBA. In particular, RPS12 is not found mutated in DBA? Thus, this mouse model is not really relevant to DBA.

7. It is interesting that Rps12 haploinsufficiency does not affect fetal liver hematopoiesis or erythropoiesis, but strongly impacts this process in adult. The explanation of this phenotype may not have anything to do with HSPC cycling rate difference between fetal liver versus bone marrow HSPCs, as speculated in the Discussion. It is important to note that a number of other mouse models such as MplKO mice, also have little phenotypes in fetal liver HSCs but strong phenotypes in adult bone marrow HSCs. Fetal liver and adult bone marrow HSPCs have different transcriptional programs, no coding RNAs, and epigenetic landscapes.

eLife. 2023 Jun 5;12:e69322. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69322.sa2

Author response


Essential revisions:

1) The authors need to formally exclude the possibility that expression of the small nucleolar genes Snord100 and Snora33, located in Rps12 introns 4 and 5, respectively, is also perturbed by the deletion of Rps12 exon 2. Any change in the expression of these snoRNAs would confound the interpretation that all the described phenotypes map back to Rsp12 specifically. Along these lines, the authors should also provide data to assess the impact of the Rps12 mutation on Rps12 protein expression.

We found that the RpS12 excision allele affected the expression of RpS12 mRNA and protein, but that levels of Snord100 and Snora33 were not changed. These results, which are consistent with the idea that the phenotype is caused by RpS12 haploinsufficiency, are described in lines 236-244 of the manuscript, and the data also shown in the itemized response to individual critiques further below.

2) Northern blots and/or other molecular assays should be used to characterize the extent to which haploinsufficiency of RpS12 impacts overall ribosome biogenesis. In addition, polysome profiles in the Rps12 mutant animals should be analyzed to assess 40S/60S subunits, 80S monosomes and polysomes.

We used qRT-PCR to find that overall ribosome subunit numbers were not detectably altered by the mutation. We did not investigate ribosome biogenesis or polysome profiles in more detail, because it is reported in yeast that RpS12 deficiency does not affect ribosome assembly and that otherwise mature SSU lacking RpS12 appear in the cytoplasm, and because the revised conclusion that RpS12 haploinsufficiency results primarily in a reduction in global translation, not an increase (see point 3 below), no longer suggests a unique mode of translation. In any case, it would be technically difficult to perform polysome profiling from the reduced numbers of stem and progenitor cells available in the mutant. These findings and their discussion are reported in lines 236-244 of the revised manuscript, and also shown in the itemized response to individual critiques further below.

3) The authors need to devise experiments to distinguish between direct and indirect consequences of Rps12 loss. For example, the authors should examine the extent to which acute loss of Rps12 regulates HSPCs, ribosome biogenesis and assembly, and ribosome composition. Cell proliferation, survival, and protein synthesis rate assays require fewer cells than polysome profiling, and these experiments would begin to provide insights into the direct cellular consequences of Rps12 haploinsufficiency.

As suggested, the revised manuscript includes acute loss of RpS12 from adult hematopoietic cells, with the conclusion that the primary effect of RpS12 haploinsufficiency is reduced translation, followed by cytopenia, and that stem cell reactivation with elevated translation is a more complex response to chronic and early RpS12 depletion. These experiments are described in lines 371-393 of the revised manuscript, the results also shown in the itemized response to individual critiques further below, and represent the major effort undertaken to revise the manuscript.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

1) The expression of both snoRNAs should be evaluated in the homozygous and heterozygous mutants. The expression levels of Rps12 protein should also be determined in the heterozygous mutants.

Supplementary Figure 3A-C of the revised manuscript shows that snoRNA levels are unaffected in heterozygous mutants, whereas RpS12 mRNA and protein levels are reduced.

Gene expression levels cannot be examined in homozygous mutants, since none are recovered.

2) Rescue of Rps12 mutant phenotypes by a Rps12 transgene should be conducted, given the probability that the expression of the snoRNAs will be disrupted in the mutant.

Please see point 1 above. In fact, snoRNA levels are unaffected in heterozygous mutants, whereas RpS12 mRNA and protein levels are reduced.

3) Northern blots and/or other molecular assays should be used to characterize the extent to which haploinsufficiency of RpS12 impacts overall ribosome biogenesis.

Supplementary Figure 3D-D’ of the revised manuscript shows Bioanalyzer data indicating that steady state levels of small subunits are not changed in the heterozygous mutant, nor is the SSU/LSU ratio. This is consistent with prior studies in yeast, which showed that RpS12 deficiency does not affect SSU biogenesis. These results are described in lines 242-244 of the manuscript, and discussed in lines 433-441 of the manuscript.

4) Have the authors considered the possibility that loss of Rps12 triggers a feedback loop that promotes ribosome biogenesis? The authors could evaluate nascent rRNA transcription levels as one measure of how the loss of this RP gene impacts ribosome homeostasis.

We did not investigate this possibility, as we now conclude that RpS12 haploinsufficiency initially reduces overall translation, rather than increasing it.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Key points

1. Have the authors formally excluded the possibility that expression of the small nucleolar genes Snord100 and Snora33, located in Rps12 introns 4 and 5, respectively, is also perturbed by the deletion of Rps12 exon 2 i.e. can they be sure that all the phenotypes are indeed Rps12-dependent?

Yes, as reported in the response to reviewer 1, point 1, above.

2. Please provide data to assess the impact of the Rps12 mutation on Rps12 protein expression.

We have examined Rps12 protein expression in Rps12 KO/+ ckit+ bone marrow cells by Western analysis, and we observed a trend towards decrease in Rps12 protein levels in Rps12 heterozygous KO cells (Supplementary figure 3C) and addressed it in the text in lines 240-242.

3. It is important to analyze the potential functional consequences of Rps12 deletion on ribosomal subunit assembly. Polysome profiles in the Rps12 mutant animals should be analyzed to assess 40S/60S subunits, 80S monosomes and polysomes. Is there any effect of Rps12 deletion on rRNA processing?

Please see data provided in response to reviewer 1, point #3. We did not follow up with polysome profiles. This is of less interest now given the conclusion of the revised manuscript that RpS12 haploinsufficiency reduces overall translation. Polysome profiling of mutant stem and progenitor cells would be very challenging, as their numbers are much reduced.

4. To what extent are the observed Rps12 mutant phenotypes indirect consequences of TP53 activation? What is the impact of the Rps12 mutation on TP53 stabilization in the different tissues affected by the mutation?

The TP53 antibodies we tried gave poor results and in the interests of time we did not continue this further. We request that this be considered beyond the scope of the current study.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

A few key experiments may help elucidate the mechanisms by which Rps12 regulates HSPCs.

1. Since this is a floxed allele, it is possible to induce acute loss of Rps12 (or Rps f/+) in vivo or ex vivo in HSPCs, to study the impact of the acute loss of Rps12. Does Rps12 haploinsufficiency reduce protein synthesis or really increase protein synthesis as shown in this manuscript?

We thank the reviewer for this excellent suggestion, which we believe has really enhanced the manuscript (please see lines 371-393 and 436-445). To determine the direct acute effects of Rps12 deletion specifically in hematopoietic cells, we generated a new RpS12flox/+; SCl-CreER mouse model which allowed us to acutely delete the RpS12 in the bone marrow. This new data is included in the new Figure 8 and Suppl Figure 4., and in the text in the Results section on p16 lines 367 and in the Discussion on page 20, line 507-522. We observed that it takes some time to develop the loss of HSC maintenance and pancytopenia phenotype after Rsp12 hetorozygous excision. Interestingly, at 12-weeks post RpS12 deletion in the bone marrow, there were no changes in peripheral blood counts, total bone marrow cellularity, or in the bone marrow stem and progenitor cell populations (Figure 8C). However, at that timepoint we already observed a significant decrease in OPP incorporation in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, consistent with decreased translation (Figure 8D). However, there were no significant differences in the cell cycle profile of these HSPCs at that time point (Supp Figure 2D). At 14-weeks post RpS12 deletion, we started to observe mild pancytopenia (Figure 8E) and a significant decrease in bone marrow cellularity, along with a decrease in HSC numbers and a trend toward decrease in progenitor populations (Figure 8F). These data suggest that the immediate effect of acute loss of RpS12 in adult hematopoietic cells is actually decreased translation, leading to a decrease in HSCs, BM cellularity and pancytopenia. This also suggests that the increased cell cycling, AKT/ERK/MTOR signaling, and translation that we observed in Rps12 KO/+ mice with embryonic deletion were likely compensatory to this loss in HSC maintenance.

2. Following up on point #1 experiment, polysome profiling will further dissect the role of Rps12 in ribosome biogenesis and assembly.

3. Has this (polysome profiling and signaling transduction) been done in hematopoietic cell line with Rps12 knockdown or CRISPR-mediated deletion of one allele of Rps12? If not, the authors should investigate the role of Rps12 in mammalian hematopoietic cell lines.

We did not perform polysome profiles. Please see the response to Reviewer 1, point #3.

4. It is important to devise experiments to distinguish the direct and indirect consequences of Rps12 loss. The ERK/mTOR signaling activation and increases in protein synthesis were consequences, or negative feedback of Rps12 loss?

Based on our new model we think that the direct effect of Rps 12 loss in hematopoietic cells is decreased translation, leading to impaired HSC maintenance (see the response to point 1 and results in Figures 8 and Supplementary Figure 4). Therefore, we think that the increased translation that was observed in Rps12 KO/+ mice with embryonic deletion was compensatory due to loss of HSCs. We discuss our current understanding in lines 441-445 of the revised manuscript.

5. It is important to devise experiments to distinguish the ribosomal and extraribosomal function of Rps12 in mammalian cells.

This is an important issue but not easily addressed. This has not been addressed in mouse models of other Rp mutants either, so there is no experimental road map to follow. We suggest it is beyond the scope of the current paper.

6. The phenotypes presented in this manuscript showed a strong HSPCs and pan-hematopoietic effects. Erythropoiesis was actually less affected. The narrative and discussion should reflect that, and de-emphasize its role in or similarity to DBA. In particular, RPS12 is not found mutated in DBA? Thus, this mouse model is not really relevant to DBA.

RPS12 might be mutated or deleted in DBA patients for which the causative mutation has not yet been found. RPS12 has not been included in any standard NGS panels for bone marrow failure syndromes. We think our report of hematopoietic phenotypes in Rsp12 KO mice should prompt the inclusion of RPS12 in future bone marrow failure NGS panels. We discuss this in lines 446-460.

7. It is interesting that Rps12 haploinsufficiency does not affect fetal liver hematopoiesis or erythropoiesis, but strongly impacts this process in adult. The explanation of this phenotype may not have anything to do with HSPC cycling rate difference between fetal liver versus bone marrow HSPCs, as speculated in the Discussion. It is important to note that a number of other mouse models such as MplKO mice, also have little phenotypes in fetal liver HSCs but strong phenotypes in adult bone marrow HSCs. Fetal liver and adult bone marrow HSPCs have different transcriptional programs, no coding RNAs, and epigenetic landscapes.

Thanks to the reviewer for raising this point, we have removed the discussion about differences between the cycling of adult and fetal liver HSCs from the discussion.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Growth and embryo development.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Blot for Figure 1—figure supplement 1B.

    The complete blot from which Figure 1—figure supplement 1B was derived is shown on the left. The 900 bp and 300 bp bands are marked on the right, as is the portion cropped for Figure 1—figure supplement 1B.

    Figure 2—source data 1. Erythropoiesis in younger and older mice.
    Figure 3—source data 1. HSCs and progenitor population distributions.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Frequency of hematopoietic progenitors.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Blots of cKit + bone marrow cells.

    (A) Complete blot corresponding to Figure 3—figure supplement 2C labeled with Ponceau S. The labeled blot is shown below including the region cropped for Figure 3—figure supplement 2C. (B) Complete blot corresponding to Figure 3—figure supplement 2C after western blotting with actin- and Rps12-specific antibodies (blot was cut in two). (C) Blots from panel B with labels, including regions cropped for Figure 3—figure supplement 2C.

    Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 2. RNA levels in ckit BM cells.
    Figure 4—source data 1. Bone marrow transplants.
    Figure 5—source data 1. Fetal liver hematopoietic populations.
    Figure 6—source data 1. Hematopoietic population cycling, apoptosis, and translation.
    Figure 7—source data 1. Blots of cKit + bone marrow cells.

    (A) Complete blot shown in Figure 7I, after blotting with anti-βactin. On the right the blot is shown with labels and with the section cropped for Figure 7I indicated. (B) Complete blot showed after blotting with anti-IF2α. On the right the blot is shown with labels and with the section cropped for Figure 7I indicated. (C) Complete blot showed after blotting with anti-pIF2α. On the right the blot is shown with labels and with the section cropped for Figure 7I indicated.

    Figure 7—source data 2. pAKT, pS6, and pERK1 levels in hematopoietic progenitors.
    Figure 8—source data 1. Conditional KO hematopoietic populations.
    Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Analysis of Rps12 SCL-CRE excised hematopoietic progenitors.
    Supplementary file 1. Antibodies used for flow cytometry panels of peripheral blood and bone marrow samples.

    This file contains a list of all the biotinylated and fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies used in both live and fixed cell samples used in the experiments described in this paper. The antibodies are grouped by flow cytometry panel and include clone name as well as the manufacturer and catalog number information for ease of use and reproducibility. Additional information on antibody concentration used for staining can be found in the ‘Key Resources Table.’

    elife-69322-supp1.xlsx (18.1KB, xlsx)
    Transparent reporting form

    Data Availability Statement

    There are no large-scale datasets associated with this paper. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES