Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 2023 May 22;51(11):5743–5754. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad416

Biochemical and mechanistic analysis of the cleavage of branched DNA by human ANKLE1

Alasdair D J Freeman 1, Anne-Cécile Déclais 2, Timothy J Wilson 3, David M J Lilley 4,
PMCID: PMC10287932  PMID: 37216589

Abstract

ANKLE1 is a nuclease that provides a final opportunity to process unresolved junctions in DNA that would otherwise create chromosomal linkages blocking cell division. It is a GIY-YIG nuclease. We have expressed an active domain of human ANKLE1 containing the GIY-YIG nuclease domain in bacteria, that is monomeric in solution and when bound to a DNA Y-junction, and unilaterally cleaves a cruciform junction. Using an AlphaFold model of the enzyme we identify the key active residues, and show that mutation of each leads to impairment of activity. There are two components in the catalytic mechanism. Cleavage rate is pH dependent, corresponding to a pKa of 6.9, suggesting an involvement of the conserved histidine in proton transfer. The reaction rate depends on the nature of the divalent cation, likely bound by glutamate and asparagine side chains, and is log-linear with the metal ion pKa. We propose that the reaction is subject to general acid-base catalysis, using a combination of tyrosine and histidine acting as general base and water directly coordinated to the metal ion as general acid. The reaction is temperature dependent; activation energy Ea = 37 kcal mol−1, suggesting that cleavage is coupled to opening of DNA in the transition state.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Recent evidence suggests that LEM-3/ANKLE1 plays an important role in providing a final opportunity to process persistent DNA junctions that have escaped enzymatic processing, and that could lead to DNA bridges linking chromosomes thus blocking cell division. Every physical connection between sister chromatids must be removed before cells can divide. Connections between segregating chromatids exist as chromatin bridges (1–3), or ultrafine bridges (4,5) that are associated with BLM and PICH helicases. LEM-3 was originally identified in a genetic screen for embryonic lethality in Caenorhabditis elegans resulting from exposure to ionizing irradiation (6). ANKLE1 is the corresponding ortholog in humans and other metazoans (7).

LEM-3/ANKLE1 protein sequences include predicted GIY-YIG nuclease domains at the C-terminus, and LEM3 was shown to exhibit nucleolytic activity on supercoiled DNA (6). We have recently shown that human ANKLE1 carries out structure-selective nucleolytic cleavage directed towards a variety of branched DNA species (8). These branchpoints would be expected to result from the failure to process recombination intermediates fully, or perhaps replication intermediates, and such structures could result in the formation of inter-chromosomal linkages. A number of lines of evidence suggest that LEM-3/ANKLE1 might be responsible for processing DNA bridges during anaphase:

  1. LEM-3 is known to interact genetically with the Holliday junction-processing enzymes MUS81, SLX1 and SLX 4, with embryonic lethality resulting in lem-3 double mutants (3,9)

  2. Cytological experiments have revealed that LEM-3 accumulates at the cellular mid-body where the two daughter cells abscise from each other (10)

  3. In lem-3 mutants treated with DNA damaging agents, and when DNA replication or chromosome decondensation are compromised then chromosomal bridges persist (3).

Thus ANKLE1 has very much the substrate specificity expected for a nuclease whose role is to catch unprocessed or partially processed junctions late in cell division (8), and its ortholog LEM3 has been shown to be located just at the point in the dividing cells consistent with that role (10). ANKLE1 has thus been described as the ‘enzyme of last resort’. Despite clear indications of the probable importance of human ANKLE1, very little is known about how the enzyme operates as a nuclease. Like the SLX1 component of the multi-component SLX1–SLX4–MUS81–EME1 resolution complex it appears to be a GIY-YIG nuclease; these are relatively rare in eukaryotes. There have been a number of crystallographic studies of different GIY-YIG nucleases (11–18), but very little mechanistic analysis. Given its likely significance in cell division it is a potential therapeutic target, and therefore it is of both intellectual and practical importance to learn more concerning the mechanism of ANKLE1 nuclease. Moreover aspects of catalytic mechanism learned for ANKLE1 can likely provide insight into the mechanism of other GIY-YIG nucleases, including SLX1.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial cloning and mutagenesis of human ANKLE1

N-terminal deletions of human ANKLE1 were generated by PCR of the coding region of isoform 1 of human Ankle1 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NP_689576), cloned into pGEX6P, using the Q5 Site-Directed mutagenesis kit (New England Biolab E0554S). DNA primers were chosen to delete sequences between the N-terminus and chosen positions (Supplementary Table S1). PCR products were transformed into E. coli DH5α and single colonies were grown in LB broth containing 100 mg/l carbenicillin and 50 μM IPTG. After 16 h, induced protein production was analysed by SDS PAGE from an aliquot of the culture medium, while the remaining culture was used to purify plasmid DNA by mini-prep (Qiagen). A deleted form beginning at methionine 331 (ANKLE1331–615) was found to be fully active, and used in all the experiments described in this work. This was found to contain a mutation R492H that facilitated growth in E. coli. Site directed mutation of active site residues were performed by PCR using the same Q5 site directed mutagenesis kit and the appropriate primers (Supplementary Table S1). All DNA constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.

Expression and purification of ANKLE1331–615 R492H in E. coli

Arctic Express E. coli were transformed with pGEX6P-ANKLE1331–615 R492H and its mutants and grown in LB supplemented with 100 mg/l carbenicillin and 20 mg/l gentamicin at 37°C until the OD600 of the culture reached 0.6. The temperature of the culture was lowered to 12°C. When the absorbance of the culture at 600 nm was between 1.0 and 1.5, ANKLE1331–615 R492H production was induced by the addition of IPTG to a final concentration of 200 μM and incubated for 24 h. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 7500 g for 15 min at 4°C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 40 ml/l of cell culture of 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 1M NaCl, 5% glycerol, 0.5 mg/ml lysozyme and 1 tablet of complete protease inhibitors (Roche) and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. Triton X100 was added to a final concentration of 0.2% (w/v) and the extract was then sonicated on ice at 30 W for 1.5 min using 10 s pulses separated by 30 s pauses using a FB705 sonicator (Fischer Scientific). The cellular extract was clarified by centrifugation at 20 000 g for 30 min at 4°C (Beckman rotor JA25.50). The supernatant was mixed with glutathione sepharose 4B beads (GE healthcare), which were preequilibrated with 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 1 M NaCl, 5% glycerol. The beads were then washed with the same buffer. GST-ANKLE1331–615 R492H was eluted as a fusion protein by incubating the beads with 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol and 20 mM glutathione. Alternatively, GST-ANKLE1331–615 R492H was cleaved with human 3C protease while bound to the glutathione column overnight in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol. GST fusion or non-fusion ANKLE1331–615 R492H were further purified by chromatography on Fractogel SO3 (Merck) in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 5% glycerol with a linear NaCl gradient from 50 mM to 1 M, followed by purification on Mono S 5/50 GL (GE Healthcare) in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM EDTA with a linear NaCl gradient from 50 mM to 1 M.

Protein concentration was measured by UV spectrophotometry using an extinction coefficient of 36 500 M−1 cm−1 for ANKLE1331–615 R492H or 79 600 M−1 cm−1 for GST-ANKLE1331–615 R492H and stored at –70°C.

Denaturing gel electrophoresis of proteins in SDS-containing buffer

ANKLE1331–615 R492H purity was analysed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in denaturing condition. Protein samples were subjected to electrophoresis in 10% polyacrylamide Bis–Tris NuPAGE (Invitrogen) in 50 mM MOPS, 50 mM Tris (pH 7.7), 3.47 mM SDS, 1 mM EDTA. Protein bands were detected using Instant Coomasie Protein Stain (Abcam) and electrophoretic migration was compared to standard proteins (PageRuler Plus Prestained Protein Ladder, Thermo Scientific).

Construction of DNA splayed Y-junctions

Oligonucleotides were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Splayed Y-junction was prepared by the hybridization of r- and x-strands (Supplementary Table S1). Where required, strands were radioactively-[5′-32P]-labelled by polynucleotide kinase (Thermo Scientific). 2 μM of oligonucleotide was incubated with 0.17 μM [γ-32P]-ATP at 37°C in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 10mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 0.1mM spermidine for 30 min. 50 mM EDTA was added to terminate the kinase reaction before the addition of the other oligonucleotide in order to generate the splayed Y-junction substrate. Oligonucleotides were hybridized to generate splayed Y-junctions by slow cooling from 80°C to 4°C. The substrate was purified by electrophoresis in 8% (29:1) polyacrylamide gels in 90 mM Tris–boric acid (pH 8.3), 2 mM EDTA.

Analysis of the multimeric state of ANKLE1331–615 R492H by gel filtration

ANKLE1331–615 R492H was subjected to gel filtration on Superdex 75 (10/300) at a flow rate of 0.4 ml min−1 in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 0.1 M NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol. Elution of ANKLE1331–615 R492H was compared to that of carbonic anhydrase (C-7025, Sigma) with an estimated molecular mass of 29 000 Da

Measurement of binding affinity by fluorescence anisotropy

The r-strand was synthesized with fluorescein attached at the 3′ terminus, using a 6-fluorescein CPG column (Glen Research 20-2961). The splayed Y-junction was generated by hybridization with the h-strand of J3. Fluorescent anisotropy measurements were performed with a SLM Aminco 8100 fluorescence spectrometer. The excitation wavelength was selected using an interference filter of 482.5 ± 31 (fwhm) nm, and the emission was selected using a monochrometer set at 530 nm with slits set at 8 (fwhm) nm. Fluorescence was measured at 20°C using 100 nM splayed Y-junction in 20 mM HEPES–NaOH (pH 7.0 or 8.0), 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MnCl2, 0.1 mg/ml BSA. ANKLE1331–615 R492H Y453F was added to the indicated concentrations. Fluorescence anisotropy (r) was measured as :

graphic file with name M0001.gif

where IVV and IVH are fluorescence intensity with the polarizers parallel and crossed respectively, and G is the ratio of detector sensitivity between vertical and horizontal polarization, and was measured for each determination in these studies.

The data were fitted to the following binding model :

graphic file with name M0001a.gif

where r0 is the anisotropy in the absence of protein, Δr is the change in anisotropy over the full range of protein concentration, Kd is the dissociation constant for ANKLE1 binding to the splayed Y-junction, [Ank] and [Y] are the ANKLE1331–615 R492H and splayed Y-junction DNA concentrations respectively.

Structural prediction by AlphaFold

The structure of Ankle1 was predicted by the software AlphaFold (model Q8NAG6). The overall confidence of the model for the nuclease domain (residue 448–566) of Ankle1 was mostly very high (64%) and the positioning of the backbone of the residues of the mutants in this study were either very high (Y453, Y486, K519 and E551) or confident (H498 and N565).

Kinetic analysis of ANKLE1 cleavage reactions

5 nM radioactively-[5′-32P] x-strand labelled splayed Y-junction DNA was preincubated with 2 μM ANKLE1331–615 R492H (or active site mutant) in 20 mM cacodylate (pH 6.5), 50 mM KCl, 0.1 mg/ml BSA at 37°C. After 3 min incubation, MnCl2 (or other metal chlorides as indicated in the text) was added to a final concentration of 10 mM to initiate the cleavage reaction. Aliquots were removed at chosen times and the reaction terminated by addition of an equal volume of 25 mM EDTA, 95% formamide. DNA substrate and products were separated by electrophoresis in a 20% (19:1) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresed in 90 mM Tris–boric acid (pH 8.3), 2 mM EDTA, 8 M urea. Radioactivity was detected by exposure to a storage phosphor screen, and quantified using a BAS-1500 phosphorimager (Fuji), or a Typhoon FLA 9500 fluorimager (GE Healthcare). Reaction progress was fitted by non-linear regression analysis to single exponential functions using KaleidaGraph (Abelbeck Software).

For the measurement of cleavage rate as a function of temperature, conditions were identical apart from the incubation temperature.

For the study of the effect of flap lengths, a lower enzyme concentration was used (200 nM) and the products were resolved on a 15% (19:1) polyacrylamide sequencing gel, that was dried before exposure. All other conditions were as above.

For measurement of cleavage rate as a function of pH the following buffers were used for the indicated pH ranges : MES (pH 5.51, 6.01 and 6.39), MOPS (pH 6.5 and 7.2) and HEPES (pH 6.86, 7.58 and 7.8). pH was measured for the reaction buffer (20 mM buffer, 50 mM KCl and 10 mM MnCl2) using an Accumet AB150 pH meter (Fischer Scientific) at 31.6°C.

Cleavage of cruciform structures in negatively supercoiled plasmid DNA

The plasmid pHRX3 (19) was used in these experiments as it contains the sequence of x strand of J3. Negatively supercoiled pHRX3 was purified from E. coli DH5α with two rounds of CsCl density gradient centrifugation. Cleavage was carried out similarly to cleavage of splayed Y-junctions; 5 nM pHRX3 was preincubated with 2 μM ANKLE1331–615 R492H in 20 mM MES (pH 5.5), 50 mM KCl, 0.1 mg/ml BSA at 31.6°C. After 3 min incubation MnCl2 was added to a final concentration of 10 mM to initiate the cleavage reaction. Aliquots were removed at chosen times and the reaction terminated by addition of 50 mM EDTA final concentration. 20 μg Proteinase K (Thermo Scientific) was added and incubated a further 1 h at 37°C. DNA was separated by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel in 90 mM Tris-boric acid (pH 8.3), 2 mM EDTA. DNA was stained with SYBR Safe and quantified by fluorescence on a Typhoon FLA 9500 fluorimager (GE Healthcare). Reaction progress of cleavage of supercoiled DNA was fitted to two exponential functions :

graphic file with name M0002.gif

where fcl is the fraction of supercoiled DNA cleaved at time t, and k1 and k2 are the two rate constants.

Permanganate probing of DNA structure

100 nM splayed Y-junction DNA radioactively-[5′-32P]-labelled on the indicated strand was pre-incubated at room temperature for 5 min in the presence of 0, 20 nM, 200 nM or 2 μM ANKLE1331–615 R492H in 10 mM cacodylate (pH 6.5), 50 mM KCl, 50 μg/ml calf thymus DNA and either 1 mM EDTA (for the active enzyme) or 10 mM MgCl2 (for the Y453F mutant). The 20 μl reactions were initiated by adding 2 μl of a 12.5 mM KMnO4 solution and terminated by addition of 1.5 μl of β-mercaptoethanol after 1 min. Reaction products were precipitated by addition of 1/10 volume of 3 M sodium acetate and 3 volumes of ethanol, resuspended in 100 μl of 1 M piperidine and incubated at 95°C for 30 min. Samples were dehydrated by addition of n-butanol and removal of the solvent phase, followed by vacuum desiccation. Dried samples were resuspended in formamide and analysed on denaturing 15% polyacrylamide sequencing gels. These were dried, exposed to storage phosphor screens and visualised with a Typhoon FLA 9500 fluorimager (GE Healthcare). Purine sequence markers were generated by subjecting the same substrates to reaction with formic acid (20) followed by piperidine cleavage as described above.

RESULTS

Expression of human ANKLE1 in bacteria

While we have previously expressed human ANKLE1 in insect cells (8) it would clearly facilitate analysis to express active enzyme in bacteria, where site-specific mutants could be easily generated. N-terminal deletions of human ANKLE1 were generated by PCR of the coding region of isoform 1 of human ANKLE1 (Figure 1A). We found that the C-terminal fragment beginning at methionine 331 (see the protein sequence in Supplementary Figure S1) was fully active, so this fragment (termed ANKLE1331–615) was used in all subsequent analysis. Sequencing revealed that this contains a R492H mutation that facilitated growth in E. coli without preventing activity. This mutation is present in all constructs used in this work. hANKLE1331–615R492H was expressed as an N-terminal fusion with GST, allowing purification on glutathione sepharose 4B beads. The fusion protein was cleaved while bound to the glutathione column with human 3C protease to release the isolated hANKLE1331–615R492H fragment. This was further purified by chromatography on two sequential ion-exchange columns. The purity of the final hANKLE1331–615R492H product was demonstrated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under denaturing conditions (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Expression of human ANKLE1 in Escherichia coli. (A) Scheme showing the cloning and expression of the C-terminal section of hANKLE1. The full-length protein has N-terminal ankyrin repeats, a central LEM domain and the GIY-YIG putative active center at the C-terminus. The C-terminal section beginning at methionine 331 was generated by PCR and fused at its N-terminus to GST to act as an affinity tag. After expression and purification on glutathione Sepharose 4B beads, the fusion protein was cleaved with 3C protease to release the hANKLE1331–615 domain used in these studies. This protein had acquired a R492H mutation during genetic manipulation allowing better expression. (B) Analysis of the bacterial expression of hANKLE1331–615 by denaturing gel electrophoresis in a 10% polyacrylamide Bis-Tris NuPage gel in SDS. Tracks 2 and 3 contain 10 μl aliquots of bacterial culture non-induced and induced by IPTG respectively. The major band is a chaperone protein that co-purifies with GST-ANKLE1. Track 4 contains purified GST-hANKLE1331–615R492H fusion protein, and track 5 contains hANKLE1331–615R492H after cleavage with Prescission protease and affinity purification. Tracks 1 and 6 contain protein molecular mass markers (sizes in kDa written on the left).

Human ANKLE1331–615R492H expressed in bacteria is active

The pure human hANKLE1331–615R492H expressed in bacteria is highly active. The pattern of cleavage on a splayed Y-junction DNA (Supplementary Figure S2) shows cleavage from 3 nt into the duplex from the branchpoint, progressively moving down the duplex region. This is exactly what was observed using the form of human ANKLE1 expressed in insect cells (8). hANKLE1331–615R492H cleaves the splayed Y-junction DNA with a rate of 52 ± 1.7 × 10−3 s−1 under our standard conditions in Mn2+ ions at 37°C. While the standard substrate has two single-stranded regions of 25 nt in length, these could be substantially shortened (either the 3′ or the 5′ strand, or both symmetrically) with retention of activity (Supplementary Figure S2).

ANKLE1331–615R492H is monomeric in free solution

Holliday junction-resolving enzymes in general bind to four-way DNA junctions in dimeric form, and introduce symmetrically-paired cleavages within the lifetime of the DNA-protein complex (21–24). While ANKLE1 will cleave four-way junctions, it does so more slowly than splayed Y-junction DNA (8), its best substrate. It therefore seemed probable that ANKLE1 acts in monomeric form. We analyzed the state of multimerization of hANKLE1331–615R492H using gel filtration. Our purified protein was applied to a Superdex 75 (10/300) column and its elution profile measured by light absorption (Figure 2A). In parallel a sample of carbonic anhydrase (molecular mass = 29000 Da) was applied to the same column. The elution profiles of the two proteins are closely similar. Since the calculated molecular mass for a monomer of ANKLE1331–615 is 33000 Da we conclude that hANKLE1331–615R492H is monomeric in solution.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Human ANKLE1 is monomeric in free solution, and binds to a junction as a monomer with nanomolar affinity. (A) Estimation of the multimeric state of hANKLE1331–615R492H in solution by gel filtration. hANKLE1331–615R492H and carbonic anhydrase (used here as a molecular mass standard) were applied separately to a Superdex 75 (10/300) column in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1mM EDTA, and elution monitored by absorbance at 280 nm. The elution profiles reveal that hANKLE1331–615R492H elutes at a closely similar point to carbonic anhydrase (molecular mass 29 kDa). Since the calculated molecular mass of hANKLE1331–615R492H is 33 kDa this indicates that it is predominantly monomeric in solution. (B) Binding of hANKLE1331–615R492H Y453F to a splayed Y-junction analysed by fluorescence anisotropy. 100 nM splayed Y-junction with fluorescein attached at the 3′ end of the single-stranded section (see insert) was titrated with hANKLE1331–615R492H and fluorescence anisotropy measured with excitation at 482.5 nm and emission at 530 nm. Fluorescence was measured in 20 mM HEPES–NaOH (pH 7.0), 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MnCl2, 0.1 mg/ml BSA at 20°C. The data are fitted to the binding isotherm described in the text. Note that the plateau value of the anisotropy is reached at 100 nM protein, showing that the stoichiometry is 1:1 protein:DNA.

ANKLE1331–615R492H binds to a junction in monomeric form, with nanomolar affinity

We have analysed the binding of catalytically-inactive hANKLE1331–615R492H Y453F to splayed Y-junction DNA by following the fluorescence anisotropy of fluorescein attached to the 3′ terminus of the single-stranded section. 100 nM of fluorescent splayed Y-junction was titrated with increasing concentrations of ANKLE1331–615R492H and the values of anisotropy plotted in Figure 2B. The anisotropy of the fluorophore attached to free DNA is 0.06, indicating that the fluorescein is very mobile. On addition of hANKLE1331–615R492H the anisotropy increases showing that mobility of the fluorophore becomes restricted on protein binding. There is a linear increase in anisotropy up to a plateau; this is characteristic of stoichiometric binding, where the concentration of DNA is significantly greater than the Kd. The plateau value of the anisotropy of 0.15 is reached at 100 nM protein, i.e. the same as the concentration of the splayed Y-junction DNA, showing that the stoichiometry is 1:1 protein:DNA. The data can be fitted to a simple binding isotherm. Although the binding affinity cannot be measured with high precision, simulation of the binding isotherms (Supplementary Figure S3A) indicates that the dissociation constant Kd is close to 1 nM. These data indicate that a single molecule of hANKLE1331–615R492H binds to the splayed Y-junction with high affinity.

The titration was repeated at the higher pH value of 8. Under these conditions only a very small change in anisotropy was measured (Supplementary Figure S3B), indicating that very little binding occurs at this pH.

ANKLE1331–615R492H makes a single incision into a cruciform four-way junction

The gel filtration data indicate that hANKLE1331–615R492H is monomeric in free solution, and the binding experiments show that it binds to splayed Y-junction in monomeric form. We would therefore expect that it cleaves only one strand in a DNA branchpoint. The best way in which to distinguish unilateral and bilateral cleavage of a four-way junction is to study the cleavage of a cruciform in a negatively supercoiled plasmid (21–23); the cruciform comprises a four-way junction connecting two stem-loops and the two arms of the plasmid. The principle is shown in Figure 3A. If an enzyme introduces a single cleavage this releases the supercoiling and the cruciform is reabsorbed so that there is no substrate remaining to be cleaved a second time. In that situation the DNA is cleaved on one strand, leaving an open circular DNA product. However, two cleavages can be made if they occur simultaneously, or within the lifetime of the enzyme-DNA complex. In that case the product will be linear plasmid. Since supercoiled, open circular and linear forms of the plasmid DNA are readily separated by agarose gel electrophoresis this provides a straightforward test distinguishing between unilateral and bilateral cleavage.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Analysis of unilateral vs bilateral cleavage of a four-way junction by hANKLE1 using a supercoil-stabilized cruciform structure. (A) The principle of the use of a cruciform-containing supercoiled plasmid to distinguish unilateral and bilateral cleavage of the four-way junction. Unilateral cleavage results in the formation of nicked circular DNA, while bilateral cleavage would result in linearization. Supercoiled, nicked circular and linear DNA may be separated by electrophoresis in an agarose gel. (B) 5 nM of pHRX3 DNA was incubated with 2 μM hANKLE1331–615R492H, aliquots removed at indicated times and the different DNA species separated by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel. These were stained using SYBR Safe and quantified by fluorimaging. The final track contains plasmid linearised by cleavage at its single EcoRI site to show the migration position of linear DNA. The gel shows that cleavage with hANKLE1331–615R492H results in complete conversion to open circular DNA, with no formation of linear product, i.e. only unilateral cleavage occurs. (C) The quantified data from (B) are plotted as a function of time, and the disappearance of supercoiled DNA (closed circles) and the formation of open circular product (open circles) fitted to double exponential functions (lines). The data for the linear DNA are plotted as closed squares.

A time course of cleavage of a supercoiled cruciform-carrying plasmid by hANKLE1331–615R492H is shown in Figure 3B, and the results quantified and plotted in Figure 3C. Over a 2 min. incubation the nuclease ANKLE1331–615R492H converts supercoiled plasmid into open circular, with no linear product visible. This demonstrates that hANKLE1331–615R492H introduces a unilateral cleavage into the cruciform junction, consistent with the enzyme acting as a monomer that cleaves one strand only. This is in marked contrast with GEN1 for example, where the open circular form is generated as a transient intermediate and linear DNA is the eventual product, showing that like other junction-resolving enzymes it acts as a dimer making bilateral cleavages (24). Reaction progress was best fitted using two exponential functions, indicating a brief lag phase prior to cleavage of the DNA.

The active center of ANKLE1

At the present time there is no crystal structure of ANKLE1 or any ortholog including LEM3. However, the structure of human ANKLE1 has been modelled using AlphaFold (25), and was downloaded from Uniprot (26) as model Q8NAG6. The putative active center of the enzyme is shown in Figure 4A. The predicted secondary structure conforms closely to that of other GIY-YIG nucleases for which structures have been determined by X-ray crystallography, including I-TevI (11), UvrC (12), R.Eco29kl (13) and SLX1 (15,18). Each comprises three antiparallel β-strands surrounded by α-helices. An alignment of putative active site sequences in vertebrates is shown in Figure 4B; all the expected conserved critical amino acids are present in human ANKLE1 and 100% conserved. These are shown on the AlphaFold prediction in stick form. They comprise the tyrosine residues of the GIY-YIG motif (Y453 and Y486), together with a histidine (H498), glutamate (E551), lysine (K519) and asparagine (N565). Each occurs in the position equivalent to that of the nucleases of known structure.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The predicted active site of hANKLE1, and analysis by mutagenesis. (A) The GIY-YIG domain of hANKLE1 predicted by AlphaFold (entry Q8NAG6). Putative active site residues are indicated in stick form, colored magenta. (B) Alignment of the GIY YIG nuclease domain between ANKLE1 from human, mouse, chicken, trout and frog. The putative active site residues are boxed and are seen to be fully conserved. (C) Effect of point mutation of putative active site residues on cleavage activity. Radioactively-[32P]-labeled splayed Y-junction DNA was incubated with natural-sequence and point-mutated hANKLE1331–615R492H variants for the indicated times. DNA and enzymes were incubated in 20 mM cacodylate (pH 6.5), 50 mM KCl, 0.1 mg/ml BSA at 37°C, and reactions initiated by the addition of MnCl2 at a final concentration of 10 mM. Product formation was analysed by electrophoresis in 20% polyacrylamide gels under denaturing conditions, and visualized and quantified by phosphorimaging. (D) Reaction progress plotted for junction cleavage by hANKLE1331–615R492H and point mutants. The data have been fitted to single exponential functions. Rates are shown in Table 1.

Each putative active center residue has been mutated, and the rate of cleavage of the splayed Y-junction substrate measured (Figure 4C, D and Table 1) in the presence of Mn2+ ions. Mutations at each amino acid led to enzymes that were impaired in cleavage activity, from a 60-fold reduction (K519A) to no detectable activity (Y453F and E551A). The results are consistent with these conserved amino acid side chains playing important roles in the catalytic mechanism of the nuclease. The proximity of Y453, Y486 and H498 in the modelled active center and their sensitivity to mutation suggests a potential role in general acid-base catalysis, as suggested for UvrC (12) and R.Eco29kl (13). Given the probable role of a divalent metal ion in catalysis it is also very possible that E551 and N565 coordinate a metal ion, discussed below.

Table 1.

Rates of cleavage by ANKLE1331–615 R492H (denoted here as ANK) and active-site mutants on the splayed Y-junction substrate. Radioactively-[32P]-labelled splayed Y-junction DNA was incubated with hANKLE1331–615R492H and point-mutated variants in 20 mM cacodylate (pH 6.5), 50 mM KCl, 0.1 mg/ml BSA at 37°C, and reactions initiated by the addition of the indicated divalent metal salt to a final concentration of 10 mM. Rates were measured by fitting reaction progress to single exponential functions. Rates were measured in triplicate, and the average and standard deviations reported. We estimate the minimum detectable rate is 10−6 s−1

ANKLE1 Ion Rate (s−1) Fold reduced
ANK Mn2+ 5.2 ± 0.2 × 10−2 (1)
ANK Mg2+ 1.5 ± 0.1 × 10−2 3.5
ANK Co2+ 0.27 ± 0.1a (0.19)
ANK Ca2+ <10−6 >50 000
Y453F Mn2+ <10−6 >50 000
Y486F Mn2+ 1.5 ± 0.1 × 10−5 3500
H498A Mn2+ 3.5 ± 0.2 × 10−4 150
K519A Mn2+ 8.5 ± 0.2 × 10−4 61
E551A Mn2+ <10−6 >50 000
N565D Mn2+ <10−6 >50 000

(a) In the presence of Co2+ ions the reaction was biphasic; the rate shown is the faster initial phase.

The dependence of ANKLE1331–615R492H cleavage on the nature of the metal ion

Our standard conditions for the study of the cleavage of DNA junctions by hANKLE1331–615R492H include Mn2+ ions. We have explored the rate of cleavage on the splayed Y-junction in different divalent metal ions. The activity is 3.5-fold lower in the presence of Mg2+ ions, but the initial rate of cleavage is 5.2 fold faster in Co2+ ions (Table 1). The enzyme is essentially inactive in the presence of Ca2+ ions. Thus the rate follows the order Co2+ > Mn2+ > Mg2+ >> Ca2+. While the low activity in Ca2+ ions is likely a result of differences in size and coordination, cleavage activity is log-linear with the pKa of the other three ions (Figure 5A). These data are consistent with proton transfer by metal ion-bound water molecules in the transition state, or potentially with the metal ion acting as a Lewis acid. As we discuss below, it is likely that a divalent metal ion is bound into the active site to act as a general acid in the hydrolysis of the phosphodiester bond.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The dependence of the rate of cleavage of splayed Y-junction DNA by hANKLE1331–615R492H on the nature of the divalent cation, and on pH. (A) Cleavage in the presence of Co2+, Mn2+ or Mg2+ as the divalent cation. Rate of cleavage is plotted on a logarithmic scale as a function of the pKa of the divalent metal ions present. The data have been fitted to a straight line. Error bars represent one standard deviation. (B and C) The pH dependence of the rate of cleavage of splayed Y-junction DNA by hANKLE1331–615R492H and hANKLE1331–615R492H H498A in the presence of Mn2+ ions. The cleavage rate has been measured at a series of pH values between 5.5 and 7.8 under otherwise standard conditions at 31.6°C. In (B), the rate of cleavage plotted on a logarithmic scale as a function of pH over the complete range for hANKLE1331–615R492H (closed circle symbols) and hANKLE1331–615R492H H498A (open circle symbols). The lowering of rate above pH 7 cannot be fitted to a simple ionization process, and measurements of binding indicate that affinity becomes lower at these pH values (Supplementary Figure S3). In (C), the rate of cleavage is plotted on a linear scale as a function of pH over the range 5.5 to 7.0. Rates have been measured in triplicate, and the error bars are one standard deviation. In most cases these are smaller than the symbols. These data for hANKLE1331–615R492H have been fitted to a single ionization indicated by the line. From this a pKa of 6.9 has been calculated.

The dependence of ANKLE1331–615R492H cleavage rate upon pH

Given the possible involvement of tyrosine and histidine side chains in proton transfer in catalysis we explored the dependence of the rate of cleavage of the splayed Y-junction by hANKLE1331–615R492H upon pH. Cleavage rate was measured in the presence of Mn2+ ions over the range 5.5–7.8 (Figure 5B). The rate rises over the pH range 5.5–7.2, well fitted by a single ionization corresponding to a pKa = 6.9 (Figure 5C). As pH values rise above 7.2 the rate falls faster than can be fitted by a second ionization. The pH dependence of the rate of cleavage by hANKLE1331–615R492H H498A was also measured and the data plotted in Figure 5B and C. These data exhibit a different profile, with a steady increase in cleavage rate across the whole range of pH. The measured value of the pKa coupled with the effect of the H498A mutation on both rate and pH profile indicates that histidine 498 likely participates in proton transfer in the reaction mechanism for phosphodiester hydrolysis.

The dependence of ANKLE1331–615R492H cleavage rate upon temperature, and possible opening of the junction

The progressive nature of the cleavage of DNA junctions by ANKLE1 suggests an opening of the dsDNA that progresses into the DNA with successive cleavage events. This might be reflected in the energy of activation for cleavage, and we therefore investigated the temperature dependence of the cleavage of the splayed Y-junction by hANKLE1331–615R492H in the presence of Mn2+ ions. The data are presented in the form of an Arrhenius plot of the natural logarithm of the observed cleavage rate (kobs) as a function of inverse temperature in Figure 6. The plot is linear, with a gradient corresponding to an activation energy Ea = 36.8 kcal mol−1.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

The temperature dependence the rate of cleavage of splayed Y-junction DNA by hANKLE1331–615R492H. Rates of cleavage were measured under standard conditions, initiated by addition of 10 mM MnCl2. The data have been plotted in the form of an Arrhenius plot, i.e. ln kobs versus 1000/T where kobs is the measured rate constant and T the absolute temperature. The rates (closed circles) were measured in triplicate, and standard deviations plotted. The line shows a fit to the Arrhenius equation, from which an activation energy Ea = 36.8 kcal mol−1 was calculated.

We have also measured the rate of cleavage of a supercoil-stabilized cruciform as a function of temperature (Supplementary Figure S4). The Arrhenius plot is linear, with a gradient corresponding to an activation energy Ea = 36.9 kcal mol−1. This is almost the same as the value measured for the splayed Y-junction.

This relatively large activation energy would be consistent with a requirement for structural distortion of the DNA substrate concurrent with bond cleavage. One possibility would be an opening of the DNA helix. We explored whether any unpairing of the helix of the double-stranded portion of the splayed Y-junction DNA prior to cleavage could be detected using probing by potassium permanganate. Unstacked thymine nucleobases can be oxidised at the C5–C6 double bond to form cis-5,6-dihydroxy thymine that renders the backbone susceptible to cleavage by 1 M piperidine at 95°C. Splayed Y-junction was radioactively [5′-32P]-labelled on either the x-strand (the 5′ terminus of the duplex) or the r-strand (the 5′ terminus of the single-stranded flap) and incubated with no protein, or with 20 nM, 200 nM or 2 μM ANKLE1331–615 R492H in the presence of 1 mM EDTA, or ANKLE1331–615 R492H Y453F in the presence of 10 mM MgCl2 (Supplementary Figure S5). The reactivity of the single-stranded DNA is clear, and the double-stranded sections are much more protected. This pattern does not change with the addition of any concentration of protein. Thus these results do not support an opening of the DNA helix by hANKLE1331–615R492H in the absence of DNA cleavage.

DISCUSSION

We have expressed the C-terminal fragment of human ANKLE1 comprising amino acids 331–615 in E. coli and found that it is active on splayed Y-junction junctions and supercoil-stabilized cruciform four-way DNA junctions with rates comparable to full-length ANKLE1 expressed in insect cells (8). A branchpoint is essential for ANKLE1 cleavage of DNA (i.e. a duplex is a very poor substrate), but the length of either or both single-stranded sections is not critical. We show here that hANKLE1331–615R492H is predominantly monomeric in free solution, and binds to a splayed Y-junction as a monomer, with high affinity (Kd ∼ 1 nM). This is fully consistent with the demonstration that the enzyme cleaves the four-way junction of a supercoil-stabilized cruciform structure unilaterally. Thus although a four-way junction is a substrate for ANKLE1, the result is a junction containing a single cleaved strand rather than complete resolution. Given that the N-terminal region of hANKLE1 that is not present in the 331–615 fragment has ankyrin repeats this could mediate protein-protein interactions that might be important in its function. However, the observation that hANKLE1331–615R492H acts in monomeric form is consistent with the primary substrate being the splayed Y-junction or similar structure, and ANKLE1 is most active on that branchpoint. Many GIY-YIG nucleases act in monomeric form (16,27). It is interesting to note that SLX1 (another GIY-YIG nuclease) is directly involved in four-way junction resolution, but works in partnership with another nuclease MUS81 to achieve the two cleavages required for resolution (1,28–31).

The pattern of cleavages on a splayed Y-junction by full-length ANKLE1 and hANKLE1331–615R492H are essentially identical, and both are consistent with a progressive movement along the dsDNA from the junction with the single-stranded DNA. We show here that the cleavage reaction is strongly temperature dependent, corresponding to a large activation energy Ea = 37 kcal mol−1; such a large activation energy is likely to arise from distortion of the DNA structure. The activation energy is virtually identical for cleavage of both the splayed Y-junction and the four-way junction of a cruciform, so is unlikely to arise from distortion of the junction structure. Moreover we observe no reactivity of the dsDNA to permanganate on addition of hANKLE1331–615R492H in EDTA or hANKLE1331–615R492H Y453F in the presence of Mg2+ ions, so in the absence of DNA cleavage the enzyme does not appear to induce local DNA melting in the ground state. DNA distortion might therefore involve unwinding of the DNA that preserves base pairing and does not result in elevated reactivity to permanganate. Or ANKLE1 might open the DNA locally as it cleaves, so strand separation is part of the activation process. Having made the first cleavage the enzyme can then make a second opening and cleavage, and so moves progressively into the dsDNA section of the junction.

The structure of the active center of human ANKLE1 modelled using AlphaFold shows three antiparallel strands of β sheet, with the putative functional tyrosine residues on the N-terminal (Y486) and central (Y453) strands. These are flanked above and below by helices on which are displayed the key histidine H498, glutamate E551 and asparagine N565. This arrangement of protein structure and the disposition of critical side chains is typical of a number of GIY-YIG nucleases that have been determined structurally (11–16). The putative active residues of ANKLE1 are clustered with a radius of 4.3 Å, and all exhibit significantly impaired activity on mutation.

Like the majority of junction-selective nucleases, ANKLE1 catalyses the hydrolysis of a specific phosphodiester linkage in a DNA junction, with transfer of the phosphate to the 5′-terminus that is created (Figure 7A). In principle this is likely to be catalysed by general acid-base catalysis in which the water nucleophile is deprotonated and the 3′-oxyanion leaving group is protonated. Many nucleases employ two-metal ion mechanisms in which metal ion-bound water molecules act as general base and general acid. However the GIY-YIG nucleases depart from this paradigm.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

The proposed catalytic mechanism of phosphodiester bond hydrolysis by ANKLE1 consistent with the experimental data, and structural data on GIY-YIG nucleases in general. (A) The hydrolysis of a phosphodiester linkage in DNA by ANKLE1 leads to transfer of the phosphate to the 5′ end of the product DNA. (B) The transition state of the proposed catalytic mechanism showing general base catalysis by the combination of histidine 498 and tyrosine 453 in which a proton from the water nucleophile (red) is transferred to the phenolic oxygen of the tyrosine, and general acid catalysis by a water molecule (magenta) in the inner coordination sphere of the divalent metal ion (green). The metal ion is bound by the side chains of glutamate E551 and asparagine N565. The DNA is shown in blue.

Our data suggest two important elements in the catalysis of phosphodiester bond cleavage by ANKLE1. First, atomic mutation of Y453 in which only the phenolic oxygen is removed leads to undetectable levels of activity. The reaction rate of the unmodified enzyme depends on pH over the range 5.5–7.0 corresponding to a pKa = 6.9. That would be consistent with a histidine undergoing proton transfer in the transition state, and the pH profile of the H498A mutant is substantially altered. In the structure predicted by AlphaFold, N2 of H498 is 2.9 Å from the phenolic oxygen of Y453. A very similar arrangement of tyrosine and histidine was observed in the crystal structures of Eco29kI (13) and SLX1 (17) with histidine N2 2.6 and 2.7 Å from the oxygen of the tyrosine respectively. We therefore hypothesize that the proton from Y453 is transferred to H498, and the phenolic oxygen then acts as a general base to deprotonate the nucleophilic water molecule (Figure 7B). We propose that the second element in the catalysis by ANKLE1 involves a divalent metal ion. We have observed that the ANKLE1 reaction rate is log-linearly dependent on the pKa of the ion present, implying that an ion-bound inner-sphere water molecule is involved in proton transfer in the transition state (Figure 7B). The ion is likely coordinated by E551 and N565; both E551A and N565D are totally inactive. A divalent metal ion was observed 2.1 Å from the carboxylate group of the corresponding glutamate in the crystal structure of UvrC (12) indicating inner-sphere coordination. Mutation of that glutamate, and also the corresponding one of SLX1 (15), led to complete loss of activity of both nucleases.

The general acid-base catalysis model we are proposing for human ANKLE1 is very similar to those proposed on the basis of crystallographic data for other GIY-YIG nucleases (12,13). However, kinetic ambiguity does not allow us to distinguish a model in which the tyrosine acts as general base and metal ion-bound water as the general acid or vice versa on the basis of our kinetic data. But comparison with crystallographic structures of other GIY-YIG nucleases bound to DNA shows that in general the critical tyrosine is observed to be on the side of the 5′O while the metal ion and the glutamate are found on the side of the 3′O (13,14,16). We therefore propose that in the hydrolysis of the phosphodiester linkage by ANKLE1 the tyrosine (assisted by the histidine) acts as the general base to deprotonate the water nucleophile, while the hydrated metal ion acts as general acid to protonate the O3′ leaving group as depicted in Figure 7B.

This model is consistent with all the available mechanistic data for ANKLE1, together with structural data for other GIY-YIG nucleases. Given the apparent similarities in active centers beween the GIY-YIG nucleases it is likely that they employ closely similar catalytic mechanisms, and that the mechanistic analysis described here can be extrapolated to the other enzymes. This might be of particular interest in the case of SLX1 that participates in four-way junction resolution in the context of the SLX1-SLX4-MUS81-EME1 complex (1,28,32–34), where it introduces one of the two required cleavage reactions and is thus comparable with ANKLE1 cleaving one strand in Y-shaped DNA junctions.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material.

NOTE ADDED IN PROOF

While this paper was in submission Chan and co-workers published a paper showing that human ANKLE1 is localized at the cell midbody: Jiang, H., Kong, N., Liu, Z., West, S. C. and Chan, Y. W. (2023) Human endonuclease ANKLE1 localizes at the midbody and processes chromatin bridges to prevent DNA damage and cGAS-STING activation. Adv. Sci. 10, e2204388.

Supplementary Material

gkad416_Supplemental_File

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Prof. William Hunter for valuable discussion, and Cancer Research UK for financial support.

Contributor Information

Alasdair D J Freeman, Nucleic Acid Structure Research Group, MSI/WTB Complex, The University of Dundee, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.

Anne-Cécile Déclais, Nucleic Acid Structure Research Group, MSI/WTB Complex, The University of Dundee, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.

Timothy J Wilson, Nucleic Acid Structure Research Group, MSI/WTB Complex, The University of Dundee, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.

David M J Lilley, Nucleic Acid Structure Research Group, MSI/WTB Complex, The University of Dundee, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK [A18604]. The open access publication charge for this paper has been waived by Oxford University Press – NAR Editorial Board members are entitled to one free paper per year in recognition of their work on behalf of the journal.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wyatt H.D., Sarbajna S., Matos J., West S.C.. Coordinated actions of SLX1-SLX4 and MUS81-EME1 for Holliday junction resolution in human cells. Mol. Cell. 2013; 52:234–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chan K.L., North P.S., Hickson I.D.. BLM is required for faithful chromosome segregation and its localization defines a class of ultrafine anaphase bridges. EMBO J. 2007; 26:3397–3409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hong Y., Velkova M., Silva N., Jagut M., Scheidt V., Labib K., Jantsch V., Gartner A.. The conserved LEM-3/Ankle1 nuclease is involved in the combinatorial regulation of meiotic recombination repair and chromosome segregation in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2018; 14:e1007453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chan Y.W., Fugger K., West S.C.. Unresolved recombination intermediates lead to ultra-fine anaphase bridges, chromosome breaks and aberrations. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018; 20:92–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tiwari A., Addis Jones O., Chan K.L. 53BP1 can limit sister-chromatid rupture and rearrangements driven by a distinct ultrafine DNA bridging-breakage process. Nat. Commun. 2018; 9:677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dittrich C.M., Kratz K., Sendoel A., Gruenbaum Y., Jiricny J., Hengartner M.O.. LEM-3 - A LEM domain containing nuclease involved in the DNA damage response in C. elegans. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e24555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Brachner A., Braun J., Ghodgaonkar M., Castor D., Zlopasa L., Ehrlich V., Jiricny J., Gotzmann J., Knasmuller S., Foisner R.. The endonuclease Ankle1 requires its LEM and GIY-YIG motifs for DNA cleavage in vivo. J. Cell Sci. 2012; 125:1048–1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Song J., Freeman A.D.J., Knebel A., Gartner A., Lilley D.M.J.. Human ANKLE1 is a nuclease specific for branched DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 2020; 432:5825–5834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Braun J., Meixner A., Brachner A., Foisner R.. The GIY-YIG type endonuclease ankyrin repeat and LEM domain-containing protein 1 (ANKLE1) is dispensable for mouse hematopoiesis. PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0152278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hong Y., Sonneville R., Wang B., Scheidt V., Meier B., Woglar A., Demetriou S., Labib K., Jantsch V., Gartner A.. LEM-3 is a midbody-tethered DNA nuclease that resolves chromatin bridges during late mitosis. Nat. Commun. 2018; 9:728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Van Roey P., Meehan L., Kowalski J.C., Belfort M., Derbyshire V.. Catalytic domain structure and hypothesis for function of GIY-YIG intron endonuclease I-TevI. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002; 9:806–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Truglio J.J., Rhau B., Croteau D.L., Wang L., Skorvaga M., Karakas E., DellaVecchia M.J., Wang H., Van Houten B., Kisker C.. Structural insights into the first incision reaction during nucleotide excision repair. EMBO J. 2005; 24:885–894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mak A.N., Lambert A.R., Stoddard B.L.. Folding, DNA recognition, and function of GIY-YIG endonucleases: crystal structures of R.Eco29kI. Structure. 2010; 18:1321–1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sokolowska M., Czapinska H., Bochtler M.. Hpy188I-DNA pre- and post-cleavage complexes–snapshots of the GIY-YIG nuclease mediated catalysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39:1554–1564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Gaur V., Wyatt H.D.M., Komorowska W., Szczepanowski R.H., de Sanctis D., Gorecka K.M., West S.C., Nowotny M.. Structural and mechanistic analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 endonuclease. Cell Rep. 2015; 10:1467–1476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Verma P., Kumari P., Negi S., Yadav G., Gaur V.. Holliday junction resolution by At-HIGLE: an SLX1 lineage endonuclease from Arabidopsis thaliana with a novel in-built regulatory mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50:4630–4646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Xu X., Wang M., Sun J., Yu Z., Li G., Yang N., Xu R.M.. Structure specific DNA recognition by the SLX1-SLX4 endonuclease complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49:7740–7752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Xu X., Wang M., Sun J., Yu Z., Li G., Yang N., Xu R.M.. Structure specific DNA recognition by the SLX1-SLX4 endonuclease complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49:7740–7752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Liu Y., Freeman A.D.J., Declais A.C., Lilley D.M.J.. A monovalent ion in the DNA binding interface of the eukaryotic junction-resolving enzyme GEN1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46:11089–11098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Maxam A.M., Gilbert W.. Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol. 1980; 65:499–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Giraud-Panis M.-J.E., Lilley D.M.J.. Near-simultaneous DNA cleavage by the subunits of the junction-resolving enzyme T4 endonuclease VII. EMBO J. 1997; 16:2528–2534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Fogg J.M., Schofield M.J., Declais A.C., Lilley D.M.. Yeast resolving enzyme CCE1 makes sequential cleavages in DNA junctions within the lifetime of the complex. Biochemistry. 2000; 39:4082–4089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Fogg J.M., Lilley D.M.J.. Ensuring productive resolution by the junction-resolving enzyme RuvC: large enhancement of the second-strand cleavage rate. Biochemistry. 2000; 39:16125–16134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Freeman A.D.J., Liu Y., Declais A.C., Gartner A., Lilley D.M.J.. GEN1 from a thermophilic fungus is functionally closely similar to non-eukaryotic junction-resolving enzymes. J. Mol. Biol. 2014; 426:3946–3959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Jumper J., Evans R., Pritzel A., Green T., Figurnov M., Ronneberger O., Tunyasuvunakool K., Bates R., Zidek A., Potapenko A.et al.. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021; 596:583–589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. The UniProt Consortium UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 51:D523–D531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kleinstiver B.P., Wolfs J.M., Edgell D.R.. The monomeric GIY-YIG homing endonuclease I-BmoI uses a molecular anchor and a flexible tether to sequentially nick DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41:5413–5427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Munoz I.M., Hain K., Déclais A.-C., Gardiner M., Toh G.W., Sanchez-Pulido L., Heuckmann J., Toth R., Macartney T., Eppink B.et al.. Coordination of structure–specific nucleases by human SLX4/BTBD12 is essential for DNA repair. Mol. Cell. 2009; 35:116–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Svendsen J.M., Harper J.W.. GEN1/Yen1 and the SLX4 complex: solutions to the problem of Holliday junction resolution. Genes Dev. 2010; 24:521–536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Castor D., Nair N., Déclais A.C., Lachaud C., Toth R., Macartney T.J., Lilley D.M.J., Arthur J.S., Rouse J.. Cooperative control of Holliday junction resolution and DNA repair by the SLX1 and MUS81-EME1 nucleases. Mol. Cell. 2013; 52:221–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Garner E., Kim Y., Lach F.P., Kottemann M.C., Smogorzewska A.. Human GEN1 and the SLX4-associated nucleases MUS81 and SLX1 are essential for the resolution of replication-induced Holliday junctions. Cell Rep. 2013; 5:207–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Fekairi S., Scaglione S., Chahwan C., Taylor E.R., Tissier A., Coulon S., Dong M.Q., Ruse C., Yates J.R. 3rd, Russell P.et al.. Human SLX4 is a Holliday junction resolvase subunit that binds multiple DNA repair/recombination endonucleases. Cell. 2009; 138:78–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Svendsen J.M., Smogorzewska A., Sowa M.E., O’Connell B.C., Gygi S.P., Elledge S.J., Harper J.W.. Mammalian BTBD12/SLX4 assembles a Holliday junction resolvase and is required for DNA repair. Cell. 2009; 138:63–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Andersen S.L., Bergstralh D.T., Kohl K.P., LaRocque J.R., Moore C.B., Sekelsky J.. Drosophila MUS312 and the vertebrate ortholog BTBD12 interact with DNA structure-specific endonucleases in DNA repair and recombination. Mol. Cell. 2009; 35:128–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

gkad416_Supplemental_File

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material.


Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES