Skip to main content
Wellcome Open Research logoLink to Wellcome Open Research
. 2023 Jan 24;8:38. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18855.1

The genome sequence of the sea mat, Membranipora membranacea (Linnaeus, 1767)

John Bishop 1, Patrick Adkins 1, Christine Wood 1, Helen Jenkins 1; Marine Biological Association Genome Acquisition Lab; Darwin Tree of Life Barcoding collective; Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life programme; Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: DNA Pipelines collective; Tree of Life Core Informatics collective; Darwin Tree of Life Consortiuma
PMCID: PMC10290214  PMID: 37363061

Abstract

We present a genome assembly from an adult colony of Membranipora membranacea (the sea mat; Bryozoa; Gymnolaemata; Cheilostomatida; Membraniporidae). The genome sequence is 339 megabases in span. Most of the assembly (99.95%) is scaffolded into 11 chromosomal pseudomolecules. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 14.7 kilobases in length.

Keywords: Membranipora membranacea, sea mat, genome sequence, chromosomal, Bryozoa

Species taxonomy

Eukaryota; Metazoa; Spiralia; Lophotrochozoa; Bryozoa; Gymnolaemata; Cheilostomatida; Malacostegina; Membraniporoidea; Membraniporidae; Membranipora; Membranipora membranacea (Linnaeus, 1767) (NCBI:txid95170).

Background

The bryozoan Membranipora membranacea is most often encountered as broad, white, lacy patches on kelp blades cast up on the shore. This species is a kelp specialist, rarely growing on anything else, and the calcified zooid walls have flexible hinges that allow the colony to flex with the kelp. Colony growth on Laminaria kelps is directed towards the frond’s base, accessing the region most likely to survive the winter ( Lutaud, 1961; Ryland & Stebbing, 1971). Large colonies can expand by as much as 10 mm a day ( Lutaud, 1961), with numerous generations of partially formed zooids in a pale growth zone at the colony edge. Colonization by M. membranacea as a non-native species on the northeastern coast of North America makes the local kelps more susceptible to storm breakage. This produces gaps in kelp canopies, facilitating invasion by non-native algae ( Scheibling & Gagnon, 2006).

Membranipora membranacea releases eggs that develop into a planktotrophic ‘cyphonautes’ larva, flattened between two triangular shells, rather than the non-feeding, shell-less ‘coronate’ larva that is brooded by most present-day bryozoans. Unusually, the settled larva metamorphoses to produce twin primary zooids, rather than a single zooid. The species is a member of a grouping referred to as malacostegan cheilostomatids, all sharing a naked membranous upper surface to the zooids and development as a cyphonautes larva. The malacostegans are paraphyletic to the inclusion of all other cheilostomatids, and include the earliest-branching cheilostomatid species in the molecular phylogeny of ( Waeschenbach et al., 2012). Large M. membranacea colonies can provide huge numbers of embryos for experimental work. These have been used to investigate the molecular identity and fate of the early blastomeres in the distinctive biradial pattern of cleavage seen in bryozoans, and relate this to the spiralian cleavage pattern that is highly conserved in many other invertebrate groups ( Vellutini et al., 2017).

The genome of the sea mat, M. membranacea, was sequenced as part of the Darwin Tree of Life Project, a collaborative effort to sequence all named eukaryotic species in the Atlantic Archipelago of Britain and Ireland.

Genome sequence report

The genome was sequenced from a M. membranacea colony ( Figure 1) collected from Queen Anne’s Battery Marina visitors’ pontoon, Plymouth (50.36, –4.13). A total of 66-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads and 173-fold coverage in 10X Genomics read clouds were generated. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data. Manual assembly curation corrected 62 missing or mis-joins and removed 17 haplotypic duplications, reducing the assembly length by 1.94% and the scaffold number by 79.81%, and increasing the scaffold N50 by 1.73%.

Figure 1. Photographs of the Membranipora membranacea (tzMemMemb1) specimen used for genome sequencing.

Figure 1.

The upper panel shows part of the colony (the cm scale refers to this) and the lower panel shows a close-up showing an array of zooids feeding with their extended lophophores.

The final assembly has a total length of 339.4 Mb in 21 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 30.0 Mb ( Table 1). Most (99.95%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 11 chromosomal-level scaffolds. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 2Figure 5; Table 2). While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype. Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited. The assembly has a BUSCO v5.1.2 ( Manni et al., 2021) completeness of 82.3% (single 79.9%, duplicated 2.4%) using the OrthoDB-v10 metazoa reference set. BUSCO loci identified as fragmented accounted for a further 8.3% of loci tested. The low BUSCO score may be due to low conservation of orthologues between M. membranacea and the metazoan species in the reference set, or underperformance of the BUSCO gene finder, given the particular gene structures in this species.

Figure 2. Genome assembly of Membranipora membranacea, tzMemMemb1.1: metrics.

Figure 2.

The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 339,374,674 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (41,072,641 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (29,963,023 and 24,422,204 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the metazoa_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/tzMemMemb1.1/dataset/CAJZBW01/snail.

Figure 5. Genome assembly of Membranipora membranacea, tzMemMemb1.1: Hi-C contact map.

Figure 5.

Hi-C contact map of the tzMemMemb1.1 assembly, visualised using HiGlass. Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=HIms5gzmQMSsRCruPkDsiQ.

Table 1. Genome data for Membranipora membranacea, tzMemMemb1.1.

Project accession data
Assembly identifier tzMemMemb1.1
Species Membranipora membranacea
Specimen tzMemMemb1
NCBI taxonomy ID 95170
BioProject PRJEB45195
BioSample ID SAMEA7536681
Isolate information modular colony
Assembly metrics * Benchmark
BUSCO ** C:82.3%[S:79.9%,D:2.4%], F:8.3%,M:9.4%,n:954 C ≥ 95%
Percentage of assembly mapped to
chromosomes
99.95% ≥ 95%
Organelles mitochondrial genome assembled complete single alleles
Raw data accessions
PacificBiosciences SEQUEL II ERR6406215
10X Genomics Illumina ERR6054950–ERR6054953
Hi-C Illumina ERR6054954
PolyA RNA-Seq Illumina ERR6464929
Genome assembly
Assembly accession GCA_914767715.1
Accession of alternate haplotype GCA_914767555.1
Span (Mb) 339.4
Number of contigs 93
Contig N50 length (Mb) 7.0
Number of scaffolds 21
Scaffold N50 length (Mb) 30.0
Longest scaffold (Mb) 41.1

* Assembly metric benchmarks are adapted from column VGP-2020 of “Table 1: Proposed standards and metrics for defining genome assembly quality” from ( Rhie et al., 2021).

** BUSCO scores based on the metazoa_odb10 BUSCO set using v5.1.2. C = complete [S = single copy, D = duplicated], F = fragmented, M = missing, n = number of orthologues in comparison. A full set of BUSCO scores is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/tzMemMemb1.1/dataset/CAJZBW01/busco.

Figure 3. Genome assembly of Membranipora membranacea, tzMemMemb1.1: GC coverage.

Figure 3.

BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot. Scaffolds are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to scaffold length. Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/tzMemMemb1.1/dataset/CAJZBW01/blob.

Figure 4. Genome assembly of Membranipora membranacea, tzMemMemb1.1: cumulative sequence.

Figure 4.

BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot. The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/tzMemMemb1.1/dataset/CAJZBW01/cumulative.

Table 2. Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Membranipora membranacea, tzMemMemb1.

INSDC Chromosome Size (Mb) GC%
OU612065.1 1 41.07 38
OU612066.1 2 39.53 38.1
OU612067.1 3 35.04 38
OU612068.1 4 35 38.1
OU612069.1 5 29.96 38
OU612070.1 6 29.39 38
OU612071.1 7 28.51 38
OU612072.1 8 27.17 37.8
OU612073.1 9 25.74 37.9
OU612074.1 10 24.42 38
OU612075.1 11 23.37 38.1
OU612076.1 MT 0.01 34
- - 0.15 42

Methods

Sample acquisition and nucleic acid extraction

A M. membranacea (tzMemMemb1) colony was collected from Queen Anne’s Battery Marina visitors’ pontoon, Plymouth, UK (latitude 50.36, longitude –4.13) on 15 July 2020. The specimen, a colony growing on Undaria pinnatifida, was collected by hand and preserved in liquid nitrogen. The collectors and identifiers were Patrick Adkins, John Bishop, Helen Jenkins and Chris Wood (Marine Biological Association).

DNA was extracted at the Tree of Life laboratory, Wellcome Sanger Institute. The tzMemMemb1 sample was weighed and dissected on dry ice with tissue set aside for Hi-C sequencing. The tissue was cryogenically disrupted to a fine powder using a Covaris cryoPREP Automated Dry Pulveriser, receiving multiple impacts. High molecular weight (HMW) DNA was extracted using the Qiagen MagAttract HMW DNA extraction kit. Low molecular weight DNA was removed from a 20 ng aliquot of extracted DNA using 0.8X AMpure XP purification kit prior to 10X Chromium sequencing; a minimum of 50 ng DNA was submitted for 10X sequencing. HMW DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system with speed setting 30. Sheared DNA was purified by solid-phase reversible immobilisation using AMPure PB beads with a 1.8X ratio of beads to sample to remove the shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA sample. The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer and Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.

RNA was extracted from tissue of tzMemMemb1 in the Tree of Life Laboratory at the WSI using TRIzol, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was then eluted in 50 μl RNAse-free water and its concentration assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer using the Qubit RNA Broad-Range (BR) Assay kit. Analysis of the integrity of the RNA was done using Agilent RNA 6000 Pico Kit and Eukaryotic Total RNA assay.

Sequencing

Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus and 10X Genomics read cloud DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Poly(A) RNA-Seq libraries were constructed using the NEB Ultra II RNA Library Prep kit. DNA and RNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL II (HiFi) Illumina HiSeq 4000 (RNA-Seq) and NovaSeq 6000 (10X) instruments. Hi-C data were also generated from the same specimen using the Arima v2 kit and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument.

Genome assembly

Assembly was carried out with Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) and haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan et al., 2020). One round of polishing was performed by aligning 10X Genomics read data to the assembly with Long Ranger ALIGN, calling variants with freebayes ( Garrison & Marth, 2012). The assembly was then scaffolded with Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) using SALSA2 ( Ghurye et al., 2019). The assembly was checked for contamination and corrected using the gEVAL system ( Chow et al., 2016) as described previously ( Howe et al., 2021). Manual curation was performed using gEVAL, HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) and Pretext ( Harry, 2022). The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2022), which performed annotation using MitoFinder ( Allio et al., 2020). The genome was analysed and BUSCO scores generated within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020). Table 3 contains a list of all software tool versions used, where appropriate.

Table 3. Software tools and versions used.

Software tool Version Source
BlobToolKit 2.6.2 Challis et al., 2020
freebayes 1.3.1-17-gaa2ace8 Garrison & Marth, 2012
gEVAL N/A Chow et al., 2016
Hifiasm 0.12 Cheng et al., 2021
HiGlass 1.11.6 Kerpedjiev et al., 2018
Long Ranger
ALIGN
2.2.2 https://
support.10xgenomics.
com/genome-exome/
software/pipelines/latest/
advanced/other-pipelines
MitoHiFi 2 Uliano-Silva et al., 2022
PretextView 0.2 Harry, 2022
purge_dups 1.2.3 Guan et al., 2020
SALSA 2.2 Ghurye et al., 2019

Ethics/compliance issues

The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner. The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project. Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Wellcome through core funding to the Wellcome Sanger Institute (206194, <a href=https://doi.org/10.35802/206194>https://doi.org/10.35802/206194</a>) and the Darwin Tree of Life Discretionary Award (218328, <a href=https://doi.org/10.35802/218328>https://doi.org/10.35802/218328</a>).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Data availability

European Nucleotide Archive: Membranipora membranacea (sea mat). Accession number PRJEB45195; https://identifiers.org/ena.embl/PRJEB45195 ( Wellcome Sanger Institute, 2021).

The genome sequence is released openly for reuse. The M. membranacea genome sequencing initiative is part of the Darwin Tree of Life (DToL) project. All raw sequence data and the assembly have been deposited in INSDC databases. The genome will be annotated using available RNA-Seq data and presented through the Ensembl pipeline at the European Bioinformatics Institute. Raw data and assembly accession identifiers are reported in Table 1.

Author information

Members of the Marine Biological Association Genome Acquisition Lab are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4783605.

Members of the Darwin Tree of Life Barcoding collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4893703.

Members of the Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life programme are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4783585.

Members of Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: DNA Pipelines collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4790455.

Members of the Tree of Life Core Informatics collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5013541.

Members of the Darwin Tree of Life Consortium are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4783558.

References

  1. Allio R, Schomaker-Bastos A, Romiguier J, et al. : MitoFinder: Efficient automated large‐scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):892–905. 10.1111/1755-0998.13160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Challis R, Richards E, Rajan J, et al. : BlobToolKit - interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g3.119.400908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheng H, Concepcion GT, Feng X, et al. : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chow W, Brugger K, Caccamo M, et al. : gEVAL - a web-based browser for evaluating genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(16):2508–2510. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Garrison E, Marth G: Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. 2012. 10.48550/arXiv.1207.3907 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ghurye J, Rhie A, Walenz BP, et al. : Integrating Hi-C links with assembly graphs for chromosome-scale assembly. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019;15(8):e1007273. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Guan D, McCarthy SA, Wood J, et al. : Identifying and removing haplotypic duplication in primary genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(9):2896–2898. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harry E: PretextView (Paired REad TEXTure Viewer): A desktop application for viewing pretext contact maps. 2022. (Accessed: 19 October 2022). Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  9. Howe K, Chow W, Collins J, et al. : Significantly improving the quality of genome assemblies through curation. GigaScience. Oxford University Press,2021;10(1):giaa153. 10.1093/gigascience/giaa153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kerpedjiev P, Abdennur N, Lekschas F, et al. : HiGlass: Web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):125. 10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lutaud G: Contribution a l’étude du bourgeonnement et de la croissance des colonies chez Membranipora membranacea Linné), Bryozoaire Chilostome. Annales de la Societé Royale Zoologique de Belgique. 1961;157–300. [Google Scholar]
  12. Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, et al. : BUSCO Update: Novel and Streamlined Workflows along with Broader and Deeper Phylogenetic Coverage for Scoring of Eukaryotic, Prokaryotic, and Viral Genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(10):4647–4654. 10.1093/molbev/msab199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rao SS, Huntley MH, Durand NC, et al. : A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014;159(7):1665–1680. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rhie A, McCarthy SA, Fedrigo O, et al. : Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species. Nature. 2021;592(7856):737–746. 10.1038/s41586-021-03451-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ryland JS, Stebbing ARD: Settlement and orientated growth in epiphytic and epizoic bryozoans.In: D.J. Crisp (ed.) Fourth European Marine Biology Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:1971;105–123. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  16. Scheibling R, Gagnon P: Competitive interactions between the invasive green alga Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides and native canopy-forming seaweeds in Nova Scotia (Canada). Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2006;325:1–14. 10.3354/meps325001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Uliano-Silva M, Ferreira JG, Krasheninnikova K, et al. : MitoHiFi: a python pipeline for mitochondrial genome assembly from PacBio High Fidelity reads. bioRxiv. [Preprint].2022. 10.1101/2022.12.23.521667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vellutini BC, Martín-Durán JM, Hejnol A: Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution. BMC Biol. 2017;15(1):33. 10.1186/s12915-017-0371-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Waeschenbach A, Taylor PD, Littlewood DTJ: A molecular phylogeny of bryozoans. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012;62(2):718–735. 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wellcome Sanger Institute: The genome sequence of the sea mat, Membranipora membranacea (Linnaeus, 1767). European Nucleotide Archive. [dataset]. accession number PRJEB45195.2021.
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Jun 23. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.20907.r57273

Reviewer response for version 1

Chenhong Li 1

The data are sufficient and well analyzed.

The low BUSCO score probably was due to low conservation of orthologues between  M. membranacea and the metazoan species as suggested by the authors. Can other alternative tools be used for testing that? 

In data availability, it says "The genome will be annotated using available RNA-Seq data and presented through the Ensembl pipeline at the European Bioinformatics Institute". Can you provide a link to it?

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Fish genomes

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Wellcome Open Res. 2023 May 23. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.20907.r57274

Reviewer response for version 1

Nansheng Chen 1

This manuscript described genome sequences of the sea mat, Membranipora membranacea for the first time, as part of the Darwin Tree of Life Project. 

There are some minor issues:

  1. Figure 1, lower panel does not have a scale. 

  2. The sentence "The malacostegans are paraphyletic to the inclusion of all other cheilostomatids, and include the earliest-branching cheilostomatid species in the molecular phylogeny of " is truncated. 

  3. The BUSCO results based on eukaryota_odb10 are far better than that based on metazoa_odb10. The authors should discuss. 

  4. Figure 2 displays GC content and AT content along the entire genome. The GC and AT content curves were perfectly smooth. Does this mean that the GC contents do not change along the genome? 

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Comparative genomics, algorithm development

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Feb 7. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.20907.r54496

Reviewer response for version 1

Andreas Hejnol 1,2, Lisa-Marie Barf 1

This paper presents the genome assembly of the species Membranipora membranacea (Linnaeus, 1767), commonly known as sea mat, in 11 chromosomal pseudomolecules.

The paper uses state-of-the-art sequencing methods, as well as suitable bioinformatic tools for eukaryote genome assembly. All data is made available and referenced under the respective accession ID.

The generated RNA-Seq data were not analyzed in the scope of the paper but are made available for future studies such as genome annotation. Overall the work of the paper contributes to the completion of sequencing 70.000 eukaryotic genomes as intended by the Darwin Tree of Life project. It will be a valuable resource for future research making it possible to include the genome of the species Membranipora membranacea.

Minor revisions:

  • Throughout the manuscript, the contents of the assembly are referred to as “scaffolds”, “chromosome-like scaffolds” and “chromosomal pseudomolecules”. It might be better to use a consistent description.

  • Looking at the heatmap in Figure 5 there is a legend present in the interactive version which is missing in the manuscript. Please consider adding the legend to Figure 5 in the manuscript as well.

  • The manuscript mentions the assembly of the mitochondrial genome. It would be interesting to include and elaborate further on the completeness of the mitochondrial genome. 

  • What part of the animal was used to extract DNA and RNA, respectively? This is not described clearly in the methods. Different parts of the animal might exhibit different RNA expression patterns. Also, since the animals are settling on algae, it is interesting how contamination was avoided. Please elaborate on this. 

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Comparative Genomics, Comparative Developmental Biology, Phylogenetic Analyses

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Wellcome Sanger Institute: The genome sequence of the sea mat, Membranipora membranacea (Linnaeus, 1767). European Nucleotide Archive. [dataset]. accession number PRJEB45195.2021.

    Data Availability Statement

    European Nucleotide Archive: Membranipora membranacea (sea mat). Accession number PRJEB45195; https://identifiers.org/ena.embl/PRJEB45195 ( Wellcome Sanger Institute, 2021).

    The genome sequence is released openly for reuse. The M. membranacea genome sequencing initiative is part of the Darwin Tree of Life (DToL) project. All raw sequence data and the assembly have been deposited in INSDC databases. The genome will be annotated using available RNA-Seq data and presented through the Ensembl pipeline at the European Bioinformatics Institute. Raw data and assembly accession identifiers are reported in Table 1.

    Author information

    Members of the Marine Biological Association Genome Acquisition Lab are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4783605.

    Members of the Darwin Tree of Life Barcoding collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4893703.

    Members of the Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life programme are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4783585.

    Members of Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: DNA Pipelines collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4790455.

    Members of the Tree of Life Core Informatics collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5013541.

    Members of the Darwin Tree of Life Consortium are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4783558.


    Articles from Wellcome Open Research are provided here courtesy of The Wellcome Trust

    RESOURCES