Skip to main content
ERJ Open Research logoLink to ERJ Open Research
letter
. 2023 Jun 26;9(3):00156-2023. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00156-2023

Pseudomonas aeruginosa population genomics among adults with bronchiectasis across Germany

Ilona Rosenboom 1,2, Sibel Oguz 1, Idalina M Lüdemann 1,2, Felix C Ringshausen 2,3,4,5, Jessica Rademacher 3,4, Ludwig Sedlacek 6, Burkhard Tümmler 1,2,4, Nina Cramer 1,2,
PMCID: PMC10291309  PMID: 37377651

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a metabolically versatile, aquatic γ-proteobacterium that colonises animate surfaces of plants, animals and humans [1]. During recent decades, this cosmopolitan Gram-negative bacterium has become one of the most frequent causative agents of nosocomial infections, associated with substantial morbidity and mortality [1]. Chronic airway infections with P. aeruginosa are a major cause of morbidity in people with cystic fibrosis (CF), COPD or bronchiectasis.

Short abstract

Genome sequencing of 130 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from 110 bronchiectasis patients identified a few dominant clones common in the global bacterial population and numerous rare clones infrequently seen in the environment or other human infections https://bit.ly/3lIfD2X


To the Editor:

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a metabolically versatile, aquatic γ-proteobacterium that colonises animate surfaces of plants, animals and humans [1]. During recent decades, this cosmopolitan Gram-negative bacterium has become one of the most frequent causative agents of nosocomial infections, associated with substantial morbidity and mortality [1]. Chronic airway infections with P. aeruginosa are a major cause of morbidity in people with cystic fibrosis (CF), COPD or bronchiectasis.

P. aeruginosa is one of the most frequently isolated pathogens in patients with non-CF bronchiectasis [2]. Clinical studies have revealed that chronic airway infection with P. aeruginosa is associated with more lung lobe involvement and a higher frequency of exacerbations [3, 4]. P. aeruginosa-positive patients had a longer disease course, faster decline of lung function and more severe Bronchiectasis Severity Index stage than those without P. aeruginosa [5, 6, 7]. Patient-to-patient transmission of P. aeruginosa is known to happen frequently in people with CF [8] but molecular epidemiology studies did not substantiate any nosocomial spread among patients with bronchiectasis [9, 10].

Transmission risk is low within families and within bronchiectasis clinics [8]. Thus, most people with bronchiectasis should have acquired P. aeruginosa from other sources, most likely from the inanimate environment. P. aeruginosa is ubiquitously present in aquatic habitats [1]. All organisms, including humans, are exposed to this bacterium, albeit usually far below the threshold of an infectious dose and culture-based microbiology diagnostics [1]. Conversely, P. aeruginosa is isolated from 20% [6] to 33% [11] of respiratory secretions of people attending a bronchiectasis clinic. Considering the high prevalence of P. aeruginosa in people with bronchiectasis, it is clinically relevant whether P. aeruginosa is generally prone to take residence in a bronchiectasis lung or whether a subset of peculiarly adapted clonal lineages preferentially conquers this habitat.

To address this issue, the molecular epidemiology of P. aeruginosa isolates was examined from patients with non-CF bronchiectasis. 296 isolates were collected from March 2018 to November 2020 at the Adult Bronchiectasis Clinic of Hannover Medical School from all patients who had signed the broad consent of the German Center of Lung Research and whose respiratory specimen (sputum as well as nasal and bronchoalveolar lavage) had been P. aeruginosa positive by culture-dependent diagnostics. The cohort consisted of, in total, 110 patients from all over Germany (figure 1a). Overall, 66% of the 110 patients were female (n=72). Mean±sd age was 55±17 years (median 58 years, range 21–83 years), while forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 63±25% of predicted (median 65%, range 17–131% of predicted). The most common aetiologies (in >5% of subjects) were primary ciliary dyskinesia and/or Kartagener syndrome in 32% (n=35), followed by “idiopathic” in 28% (n=31), asthma/allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in 16% (n=17), “other” in 14% (n=15) and nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary as well as autoimmune disease in 6% of patients (n=6) each. The 296 P. aeruginosa isolates were analysed by shotgun whole-genome sequencing. The multilocus sequence type (ST) [12] was determined using a mapping-based approach leveraging Illumina short reads against the P. aeruginosa PA14 reference genome. If serial isolates had been collected from one patient, one strain per clone was selected for further analysis. As shown in the phylogram (figure 1b), this set of 130 independent isolates demonstrated a genomically highly diverse P. aeruginosa population at our Adult Bronchiectasis Clinic. In total, 73 STs were identified in the 130 genomes, 53 STs of which were only observed in a single strain (figure 1c). 12 STs were novel and had not been reported before. New STs were assigned by the Pub-MLST database [12]. Of shared STs, we detected four pairs, eight trios and four quartets. Four STs were represented by five or more strains.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Epidemiology of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa population in non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis across Germany compared with that of two international Pseudomonas genome databases. a) Distribution of patients’ place of residence (yellow dot) across Germany, in relation to the Adult Bronchiectasis Clinic at Hannover Medical School (MHH) (red arrow; mean distance 120 km). b) Phylogram of the sequence types (STs) of the 5098 P. aeruginosa genomes in the Pathosystems Resource Integration Center (PATRIC) database. Numerical ST and colour indicate the four most frequent STs identified in the bronchiectasis cohort. c) Clonal distribution of in total 130 P. aeruginosa isolates from people with non-CF bronchiectasis across Germany. Absolute counts of different STs verified by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) are shown. MLST is based on sequence variants in eight highly conserved housekeeping genes [12]. d) Ranks of the 20 most common STs in people with non-CF bronchiectasis in Germany at MHH compared with the top 20 ranks of STs of P. aeruginosa genomes and their absolute numbers (right side in each ST box) deposited in the PATRIC [13, 14], the International Pseudomonas Genome Database (IPGD) [15] and the top 20 ranks of database subgroups therein differentiated by habitat of origin. The chosen categories were (from left to right) chronic human infections, human infections, the hospital environment and the inanimate environment untouched by medicinal activity. Entries from the IPGD [15] were curated for independent isolates if metadata were available. Metadata were unavailable for 2333 out of 4264 genomes deposited with a MLST. The four most common P. aeruginosa STs in people with bronchiectasis are depicted by the same colours in parts b–d.

Figure 1d compares the relative abundance of P. aeruginosa STs among our bronchiectasis population with that of isolates from chronic and acute human infections, the hospital environment, soil and aquatic habitats in the inanimate environment, and the global population documented in the Pathosystems Resource Integration Center [13, 14] and the International Pseudomonas Genome Database [15]. The four most frequent STs found in bronchiectasis airways belonged to the 20 most common clones in the worldwide P. aeruginosa population that are widespread in human infections and in the non-human inanimate environment [12, 15]. Of these four most common clonal lineages in the bronchiectasis isolates, ST27 is characterised by extreme genomic homogeneity, i.e. >90% of strains in the phylogenetic subgroup belong to ST27 [13, 14]. ST17 and ST253 represent the global clones C and PA14 that had been detected in a wide range of habitats all over the world. ST395 represented the most frequently detected clone among our bronchiectasis population. This clonal lineage is less frequent in human infections and rare in the inanimate environment. Thus, ST395 was the only clone in our population that potentially may be overrepresented in bronchiectasis compared to other habitats. However, this assumption needs to be validated in independent bronchiectasis cohorts [16].

P. aeruginosa is one of the bacteria belonging to the ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp.) pathogens that are a threat all over the world due to their capacity to become increasingly resistant to all available antibiotics [1]. Driven by this threat, multiple isolates of the multidrug-resistant high-risk clones ST111, ST146, ST235 and ST274 have been sequenced [12, 13, 15]. Thus, their high frequency in the genome databases may be attributable to clinical needs and focus on hospitals, particularly intensive care units. However, in the context of our Adult Bronchiectasis Clinic, it is reassuring that high-risk clones were only identified at comparably very low frequency.

In summary, our findings indicate that the population biology of P. aeruginosa in bronchiectasis is characterised by a broad range of rare clones and few dominant clonal lineages, which show worldwide distribution in disease and environment. Neither within-centre nosocomial transmission, epidemic virulent clones nor outgrowth lineages that are specific for other diseases were observed. These findings among people with bronchiectasis are in contrast to the long-standing experience in CF where within-family, within-centre, domestic and international spread of epidemic clones has been frequently reported [8], and support the originality of bronchiectasis as a distinct disease entity [4].

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Jan Fuge (Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, and Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease BREATH, German Center for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany) for data extraction from our clinical database. The authors would also like to acknowledge and thank the sequencing core unit at Hannover Medical School (RCUG) for generating the sequencing data.

Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

Support statement: This study was supported by a grant of the German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF, project: TTU09.911). Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

Conflict of interest: I. Rosenboom, S. Oguz, I. M. Lüdemann, J. Rademacher, L. Sedlacek and N. Cramer have nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: F.C. Ringshausen declares grants to their institution from the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), IMI (EU/EFPIA), iABC Consortium (including Alaxia, Basilea, Novartis and Polyphor), Mukoviszidose Institute, Novartis, Insmed Germany, Grifols, Bayer and InfectoPharm; consulting fees from Parion, Grifols, Zambon, Insmed and the Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung; payments or honoraria from I!DE Werbeagentur GmbH, Interkongress GmbH, AstraZeneca, Insmed, Grifols and Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main; payment to their institution for expert testimony at the Social Court Cologne; support for attending meetings from German Kartagener Syndrome and PCD PAG and Mukoviszidose e.V; participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for Insmed, Grifols and Shionogi; fees for clinical trial participation paid to their institution by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celtaxsys, Corbus, Insmed, Novartis, Parion, University of Dundee, Vertex and Zambon; and honorary roles as Coordinator of the ERN-LUNG Bronchiectasis Core Network, Chair of the German Bronchiectasis Registry PROGNOSIS, Member of the SteerCo of the European Bronchiectasis Registry EMBARC, Member of the SteerCo of the European NTM Registry EMBARC-NTM, Co-Speaker of the Medical Advisory Board of the German Kartagener Syndrome and PCD PAG, Speaker of the Respiratory Infections and TB group of the German Respiratory Society (DGP), Speaker of the Cystic Fibrosis group of German Respiratory Society (DGP), PI of the DZL, member of the protocol review committee of the PCD-CTN and Member of Physician Association of the German Cystic Fibrosis PAG.

Conflict of interest: B. Tümmler reports grants from the German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), the German Research Foundation (DFG); and consulting fees from Helmholtz Institute for Infection Research (HZI); payments or honoraria from Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Germany) Inc.

References

  • 1.Tümmler B. What makes Pseudomonas aeruginosa a pathogen? Adv Exp Med Biol 2022; 1386: 283–301. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-08491-1_10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vidaillac C, Chotirmall SH. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in bronchiectasis: infection, inflammation, and therapies. Expert Rev Respir Med 2021; 15: 649–662. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1906225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chalmers JD, Aliberti S, Filonenko A,et al. Characterization of the “frequent exacerbator phenotype” in bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 197: 1410–1420. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201711-2202OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aliberti S, Goeminne PC, O'Donnell AE,et al. Criteria and definitions for the radiological and clinical diagnosis of bronchiectasis in adults for use in clinical trials: international consensus recommendations. Lancet Respir Med 2022; 10: 298–306. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00277-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Choate R, Aksamit TR, Mannino D,et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa associated with severity of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis measured by the modified bronchiectasis severity score (BSI) and the FACED: The US bronchiectasis and NTM Research Registry (BRR) study. Respir Med 2020; 177: 106285. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Martinez-García MA, Oscullo G, Posadas T,et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and lung function decline in patients with bronchiectasis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 27: 428–434. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Finch S, McDonnell MJ, Abo-Leyah H,et al. A comprehensive analysis of the impact of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization on prognosis in adult bronchiectasis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12: 1602–1611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chalmers JD, Ringshausen FC, Harris B,et al. Cross-infection risk in patients with bronchiectasis: a position statement from the European Bronchiectasis Network (EMBARC), EMBARC/ELF patient advisory group and European Reference Network (ERN-Lung) Bronchiectasis Network. Eur Respir J 2018; 51: 1701937. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01937-2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cramer N, Sedlacek L, Tümmler B,et al. Low transmission risk of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a bronchiectasis clinic based on the knowledge of bacterial population biology. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1802191. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02191-2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sobala R, Brooks K, Davison J,et al. Family case studies: absence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa transmission in bronchiectasis. ERJ Open Res 2022; 8: 00280-2022. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00280-2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Quellhorst L, Barten-Neiner G, de Roux A,et al. Psychometric validation of the German translation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B)-Data from the German Bronchiectasis Registry PROGNOSIS. J Clin Med 2022; 11: 441. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3: 124. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Abram KZ, Jun SR, Udaondo Z. Pseudomonas aeruginosa pangenome: Core and accessory genes of a highly resourceful opportunistic pathogen. Adv Exp Med Biol 2022; 1386: 3–28. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-08491-1_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Olson RD, Assaf R, Brettin T,et al. Introducing the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC): a resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51: D678–D689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Winsor GL, Griffiths EJ, Lo R,et al. Enhanced annotations and features for comparing thousands of Pseudomonas genomes in the Pseudomonas genome database. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44: D646–D653. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Aliberti S, Polverino E, Chalmers JD,et al. The European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC) ERS Clinical Research Collaboration. Eur Respir J 2018; 52: 1802074. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02074-2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ERJ Open Research are provided here courtesy of European Respiratory Society

RESOURCES