Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Mar 27;35(25):9770–9779. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2053102

Characterization of amniotic fluid sludge in preterm and term gestations

Juan Pedro Kusanovic 1,2, Eunjung Jung 3,4, Roberto Romero 3,5,6,7,8, Pooja Mittal Green 3,9, Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang 3,10, Edi Vaisbuch 3,11,12, Offer Erez 3,4,13, Chong Jai Kim 3,14, Luis F Gonçalves 3,15, Jimmy Espinoza 3,16, Shali Mazaki-Tovi 3,17, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa 3,4, Ramiro Diaz-Primera 3,4, Lami Yeo 3,4, Manaphat Suksai 3,4, Francesca Gotsch 3,4, Sonia S Hassan 4,18,19
PMCID: PMC10291738  NIHMSID: NIHMS1900051  PMID: 35341439

Abstract

Objective:

To describe the characteristics of amniotic fluid sludge obtained from patients in term and preterm gestations.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study included patients with dense aggregates of particulate matter detected in amniotic fluid, observed with transvaginal sonography. All patients were in labor and had an impending delivery, either preterm or at term. Echogenic material contained within amniotic fluid was retrieved transvaginally by needle amniotomy under direct visualization. Amniotic fluid analysis consisted of a Gram stain, cultures for aerobic/anaerobic bacteria and genital mycoplasmas, and a white blood cell count.

Results:

Twenty-five patients ranging from 18 to 41 weeks of gestation were included in the study. We observed the following: (1) the appearance of amniotic fluid was consistent with pus-like material, vernix, or meconium by naked eye examination; (2) samples collected before 33 weeks of gestation (n=13) had a pus-like appearance; however, after this gestational age, most of the samples [83% (10/12)] appeared to be consistent with vernix; (3) amniotic fluid cultures were positive for microorganisms in 13 patients, of which 10 were preterm gestations before 33 weeks; (4) the most frequent microorganisms retrieved by culture were genital mycoplasmas (Ureaplasma urealyticum [46% (6/13)], followed by Mycoplasma hominis [31% (4/13)] and Candida albicans [15% (2/13)]; and (5) patients with sonographic particulate matter in preterm gestations frequently presented acute histologic chorioamnionitis and funisitis, but these conditions were rare in patients at term.

Conclusion:

The nature of amniotic fluid particulate material varies as a function of gestational age. The material obtained in preterm gestations is frequently related to an inflammatory process, while that obtained at term is often consistent with vernix and appears to represent a maturational process.

Keywords: Amniocentesis, congenital dermatitis, intra-amniotic infection, meconium, vernix

INTRODUCTION

Sonographic particulate matter in amniotic fluid can correspond to vernix [16], meconium [7,8], blood [9], and inflammatory material associated with intraamniotic infection or intraamniotic inflammation [1013], or to desquamated skin cells in the case of congenital ichthyosis [14,15]. We use the term ‘sludge’ to describe particulate matter in amniotic fluid, identifying patients who present with preterm labor [13,16], a short cervix [17], and cervical insufficiency (also referred to as advanced cervical dilatation) [10,18,19]. Amniotic fluid sludge in the mid-trimester is a risk factor for intraamniotic infection and intraamniotic inflammation [1013], spontaneous preterm delivery [17,2022], acute histologic chorioamnionitis, and funisitis [10,13,16,17,20,2232]. By contrast, particulate matter at term often reflects fetal maturation and has been reported as representing either vernix [16] or meconium [7,8], largely based on case reports.

This study was undertaken to characterize the appearance, microbiology, and inflammatory status of amniotic fluid, as well as the placental/extraplacental membranes and umbilical cord, in patients with particulate matter in amniotic fluid in term and preterm gestations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

This cross-sectional study included patients with particulate matter, detected with transvaginal sonography, who had an impending delivery, either preterm or at term. Amniotic fluid was retrieved transvaginally by needle amniotomy under direct visualization during labor. Women who agreed to undergo this procedure were asked to donate additional amniotic fluid and to allow the collection of clinical information for research purposes. All patients provided written informed consent prior to the procedure and the collection of samples. The use of biological specimens as well as clinical and ultrasound data for research purposes was approved by the Human Investigation Committee of Wayne State University (Detroit, MI, USA).

Sample collection

Under sterile speculum examination, the membranes were cleansed with saline and 10% povidone-iodine (Scrub Care®, Cardinal Health, Aurora, IL, USA). A needle amniotomy was performed and the sonographic particulate matter was immediately aspirated under direct visualization. Samples of amniotic fluid were transported to the laboratory in a sterile, capped syringe and cultured for aerobic/anaerobic bacteria as well as genital mycoplasmas. The white blood cell count [33], glucose concentration [34], and Gram stain [35] were also performed in amniotic fluid shortly after collection, as previously described. Shortly after amniocentesis, amniotic fluid not required for clinical assessment was centrifuged at 1,300×g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was aliquoted and stored at −80 °C until analysis.

Determination of interleukin-6 in amniotic fluid

Interleukin (IL)-6 concentrations were determined to assess the presence and magnitude of the intraamniotic inflammatory response, by using a sensitive and specific enzyme immunoassay obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). The details of the assay, including sensitivity and the inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation, have been previously reported [36,37]. The cut-off value of 2.6 ng/mL has been previously reported for the diagnosis of intraamniotic inflammation [3639].

Placental histopathologic examination

Placentas were collected in the Labor and Delivery Unit or Operating Room at Hutzel Women’s Hospital of the Detroit Medical Center and transferred to the Perinatology Research Branch laboratory (Detroit, MI, USA). A sampling of the placentas was conducted according to protocols of the Perinatology Research Branch, as previously described [4045]. A minimum of five full-thickness sections of the chorionic plate, three sections of the umbilical cord, and three chorioamniotic membrane rolls from each case were examined by placental pathologists who were blinded to the clinical histories and additional testing results. Acute inflammatory lesions of the placenta (maternal inflammatory response and fetal inflammatory response) were diagnosed according to established criteria, including staging and grading [43,45,46]. Severe acute placental inflammatory lesions were defined as stage 3 and/or grade 2 [43,45].

Statistical analysis

Comparisons between proportions were performed with the Fisher’s exact test.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients ranging from 18 to 41 weeks of gestation were included in the current study. Table 1 illustrates the clinical characteristics, appearance of the particulate material in amniotic fluid, amniotic fluid white blood cell count, glucose concentration, Gram stain, microbiology by culture, and the presence or absence of acute inflammatory lesions of the placenta.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics, appearance of particulate material in amniotic fluid, amniotic fluid white blood cell count, glucose concentration, Gram stain, microbiology by culture, and the presence or absence of acute inflammatory lesions of the placenta

Patient number Clinical presentation GA at amniocentesis (weeks) Amniotic fluid results GA at delivery (weeks) Acute chorioamnionitis Acute funisitis
Appearance Color Glucose (mg/dL) WBC (cells/mm3) Gram stain Microorganisms detected by cultivation Present Severe lesions Present Severe lesions
1 Cervical insufficiency 18.7 Pus Yellow N/A 560 Positive Sthaphylococcus simulans 18.9 Yes Yes Yes Yes
2 Preterm labor 20.7 Pus Yellow 22 54 Negative Ureaplasma urealyticum 20.7 Yes No No No
3 Preterm labor 21.3 Pus Yellow 10 10400 Negative Ureaplasma urealyticum, Prevotell a species 21.3 Yes Yes Yes No
4 Preterm labor 21.6 Pus Straw 10 800 Positive Candida albicans, Proteus mirabilis, Corynebacterium spp, Ureaplasma urealyticum 21.6 Yes Yes Yes Yes
5 Preterm labor 21.7 Pus Yellow <20 1564 Positive Prevotell a species, Fusobacterium nucleatum 21.9 Yes Yes Yes Yes
6 Preterm labor 21.7 Pus Yellow 30 310 Negative Negative 21.7 No No No No
7 Preterm labor 23.7 Pus Hazy 10 6 Negative Streptoccocus viridans 23.7 Yes No No No
8 Fetal death 26 Pus Yellow 10 2520 Positive Gemella moribillorum, Peptostre ptococcus spp, Prevotell a melaninogenica Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis 26 Yes Yes Yes No
9 Preterm labor 26.4 Pus Yellow 15 0 Positive Lactobacillus gensenii, Streptococcus anginosus, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis 26.4 Yes No Yes No
10 Preterm labor 27.4 Pus Yellow 36 1 Negative Negative 28 Yes No No No
11 Preterm labor 28.7 Pus Milky 9 19650 Positive Streptococcus mutans, Aspergill us flavus, Mycoplasma hominis 28.7 Yes Yes Yes No
12 Preterm labor 32.1 Pus Yellow 25 15 Negative Negative 32.1 Yes No No No
13 Preterm labor 32.6 Pus Yellow 10 100 Positive Candida albicans 32.6 No No Yes No
14 Preterm labor 33 Vernix Straw 10 650 Negative Negative 33 Yes No No No
15 Preterm labor 33.9 Vernix White 17 13 Negative Negative 33.9 No No No No
16 Preterm labor 36.9 Vernix Yellow 10 0 Negative Negative 36.9 No No No No
17 Term labor 38.9 Vernix White 20 7 Negative Negative 38.9 No No No No
18 Term labor 39.1 Vernix Str aw 10 0 Negative Negative 39.1 No No No No
19 Term labor 39.3 Vernix Straw 10 0 Negative Negative 39.4 No No No No
20 Term labor 39.7 Vernix White 30 5560 Negative Ureaplasma urealyticum 39.7 No No Yes No
21 Term labor 39.9 Pus Yellow N/A N/A Negative Enterococcus faecalis, Lactobacillus species, Mycoplasma hominis 39.9 No No No No
22 Term labor 40.7 Vernix Milky 10 900 Positive Clostridium innocuum, Mobiluncus mulieris 40.7 No No No No
23 Term labor 40.9 Meconium Green 14 0 Negative Negative 40.9 No No No No
24 Term labor 41 Vernix Clear 10 0 Negative Negative 41 Yes No No No
25 Term labor 41.6 Vernix Straw 10 30 Negative Negative 41.7 No No No No

GA; gestational age, WBC; white blood cell

The appearance of the material by the naked eye was identified as pus-like, vernix, or meconium (Figure 1). All samples of early preterm gestations (<33 weeks, n=13) contained pus-like material. After 33 weeks of gestation and, in particular, at term, most of the cases [83% (10/12)] were consistent with vernix. Pus-like material was only present in one patient at term. A positive amniotic fluid culture for bacteria was more frequent in early preterm samples than in those collected closer to term [77% (10/13) vs. 25% (3/12); p=0.02]. The most frequent microorganisms isolated were Ureaplasma urealyticum [46% (6/13)], followed by Mycoplasma hominis [31% (4/13)] and Candida albicans [15%, (2/13)]. In 54% (7/13) of these cases, infections were polymicrobial. The frequency of acute histologic chorioamnionitis [85% (11/13) vs. 17% (2/12); p=0.0012], as well as funisitis [62% (8/13) vs. 0% (0/12); p=0.0016], was higher in patients who were early preterm than in those close to term gestation. None of the patients with particulate matter at term presented severe acute placental inflammatory lesions (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Sonographic particular matter in amniotic fluid was identified as pus-like, vernix, or meconium.

Figure 2 displays an illustrative case of spontaneous preterm labor and delivery at 32.6 weeks of gestation (patient number 13), showing the presence of dense, irregular aggregates of particulate matter at the bulging membranes during transvaginal ultrasound (Figure 2a). Particulate matter in amniotic fluid was collected through transvaginal amniocentesis and macroscopically appeared as pus-like material (Figure 2b). The amniotic fluid glucose concentration was 10 mg/dL, the white blood cell count was 100 cells/mm3, and the Gram stain was positive for bacteria. The concentration of IL-6 in amniotic fluid was extremely elevated (79.6 ng/mL), consistent with intraamniotic inflammation. The amniotic fluid culture was positive for Candida albicans (Figure 2c). The fetus presented systemic fetal inflammatory response syndrome, determined by an elevated cord blood IL-6 concentration (110 pg/ml) and the presence of funisitis. The neonate had an erythematous maculopapular rash on the back and head, considered the result of a Candida infection (Figure 2d).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A case of spontaneous preterm labor and delivery at 32.6 weeks of gestation (patient number 13) (a) Two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound shows bulging membranes in the vagina containing a dense, irregular, and hyperechogenic aggregate of particulate matter. (b) The particular matter in amniotic fluid was collected by transvaginal amniocentesis and macroscopically appeared as pus-like material. (c) The amniotic fluid culture was positive for Candida albicans. (d) The neonate had an erythematous maculopapular rash on the back and head, considered as a Candida infection.

Figure 3 displays a case of spontaneous preterm labor and delivery at 33.9 weeks of gestation (patient number 15), showing homogeneous particulate matter close to the cervix (Figure 3a). Particulate matter in amniotic fluid was collected through transvaginal amniocentesis. This matter was opaque with a whitish appearance resembling vernix (Figure 3b) and had only flat epithelial cells without bacteria (Figure 3c); the results of amniotic fluid analysis and histopathologic examination of the placenta did not show any evidence of inflammation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

A case of spontaneous preterm labor and delivery at 33.9 weeks of gestation (patient number 15) (a) Two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound shows free-floating particles and an aggregate of particulate matter close to the uterine cervix. (b) The amniotic fluid was opaque with a whitish aspect, resembling vernix. (c) Only epithelial cells were observed in the Gram stain.

DISCUSSION

Principal findings of the study

The main finding of our study indicates that, in preterm gestations, sonographic amniotic fluid particulate matter often corresponds to an inflammatory process, while in term gestations, it is associated with either vernix or meconium. Therefore, the clinical significance of particulate matter is related to gestational age at diagnosis.

Sonographic particulate matter in amniotic fluid

Particulate matter observed during the second trimester of pregnancy has been attributed to intraamniotic inflammation or intraamniotic infection [1013], bleeding [9], desquamated material such as in the case of an acrania-anencephaly sequence [4749], or congenital ichthyosis [14,15]. Patients with an elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein result have also been reported to have echogenic amniotic fluid [50], and this finding has been interpreted as reflecting intraamniotic bleeding.

A question that often emerges in clinical practice is whether the diagnosis of particulate matter requires amniocentesis to ascertain the presence or absence of intraamniotic infection or intraamniotic sterile inflammation and whether the sonographic characteristics of the particulate matter can provide insight as to the nature of the material responsible for the sonographic image.

Amniotic fluid sludge as a sonographic sign of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation in preterm gestation

The term amniotic fluid ‘sludge’ was introduced to refer to the presence of dense aggregates of particulate matter in close proximity to the internal cervical os in patients with spontaneous preterm labor and intact membranes [16]. We subsequently found that sludge corresponds to a microbial biofilm in some cases [11].

Table 2 displays a summary of previous studies in which amniotic fluid sludge has been detected in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes, a short cervix, and cervical insufficiency [16,17,29,51]. Sludge was present in 18–23% of patients with preterm labor and intact membranes and was associated with intraamniotic infection (defined as a positive amniotic fluid culture for microorganisms) in 33% of cases [16,51]. The majority of patients had histologic chorioamnionitis (77.8%) and delivered within 7 days (71.4%) among those who presented with sludge [16]. Genital mycoplasmas were the most frequent microorganisms reported in cases with amniotic fluid sludge [16,51]. Among patients with a sonographic short cervix between 13 and 29 weeks of gestation, those with sludge had a higher rate of positive amniotic fluid culture for bacteria (21.7% vs. 0%; p=0.01), intraamniotic inflammation (27.3% vs. 3.5%; p=0.03), and a greater risk of preterm delivery at <28 weeks (46.5% vs. 5.8%; p <0.001) than those without sludge [17]. Moreover, several reports indicate that amniotic fluid sludge is a risk factor for intraamniotic infection in patients with cervical insufficiency [29,52].

Table 2.

Summary of studies reporting frequency of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation, amniotic fluid microbiology in patients with amniotic fluid ‘sludge’ in preterm gestations

Study Clinical presentat ion Gestational age, weeks Amniotic fluid ‘sludg e’ % (n/N) Amniocentesis in patients with amniotic fluid ‘sludge’, N Intra-amnio tic infection % (n/N) Methods for the detection of microorganisms Detected Microorganisms Intra-amniotic inflammation* % (n/N)
Espinoza et al [16] Preterm labor and intact membranes 20 – 35 22.6% (19/84) 18 33.3% (6/18) Cultivation Ureaplasma urealyticum, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Candida albicans, Peptostreptococcus spp., Group B streptococci, Gardnerella vaginalis N/A
Yoneda et al [51] Preterm labor and intact membranes 20 – 29 18.1% (19/105) 19 31.6% (6/19) Cultivation and PCR Group B streptococci, Ureaplasma parvum, Flavobacterium succinicans N/A
Kusanovic et al [17] Short cervix 13 – 29 23.1% (28/121) 23 21.7% (5/23) Cultivation Ureaplasma urealyticum, Staphylococcus aureus, Fusobacterium nucleatum 27.3% (6/22)
Paules et al [29] Cervical insufficiency 21–24 N/A 3 66.7% (2/3) Cultivation Fusobacterium nucleatum 100% (3/3)
Kusanovic et al (current study) Preterm labor 20 – 34 N/A 13 61.5% (8/13) Cultivation Ureaplasma urealyticum, Candida albicans, Fusobacteriu m nucleatum, Mycoplasma hominis, etc. 61.5% (8/13)
*

Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an elevated amniotic fluid white blood cell count >50 cells/mm3.

N/A : not applicable

The observations reported herein are consistent with previous studies, thus indicating that particulate matter in the mid and early third trimester in patients with spontaneous preterm labor is often related to intraamniotic inflammation and intraamniotic infection. Indeed, most of the patients with early preterm labor and acute cervical insufficiency had microorganisms in the amniotic fluid as well as acute histologic chorioamnionitis.

Amniotic fluid particulate matter close to term

Echogenic amniotic fluid close to term is most often due to vernix and infrequently due to meconium. Table 3 displays a summary of previous studies in which echogenic amniotic fluid has been detected in patients close to term. Among patients with echogenic amniotic fluid in the third trimester, the frequency of vernix ranges from 95–100%, whereas the frequency of meconium ranges from 5–10% [2,5,8]. In the current study, we observed that 83% of particulate material at near-term was vernix and 8% was meconium. None of cases with echogenic amniotic fluid at term had severe acute histologic chorioamnionitis and funisitis.

Table 3.

Summary of studies reporting characteristics of echogenic amniotic fluid close to term determined by amniocentesis

Study Gestational age, weeks Amniocentesis,N Appearance of amniotic fluid, % (n/N)
Parulekar et al [2] 35 – 40 9 Vernix [100% (9/9)]
Brown et al [5] 32 – 39 19 Vernix [95% (18/19)] Meconium [5% (1/19)]
Sherer et al [8] >37 20 Clear [90% (18/20)] Meconium [10% (2/20)]
Kusanovic et al (current study) 35 – 42 10 Vernix [80% (8/10)] Meconium [10% (1/10)]

Collectively, the nature of amniotic fluid particulate material obtained at term is often consistent with vernix and appears to represent a phenomenon related to fetal maturation at term.

Amniotic fluid sludge and biofilms

Microbial biofilms have been identified in cases of intraamniotic infection with amniotic fluid sludge by scanning electron microscopy, which allowed visualization of bacteria embedded in amorphous material and in inflammatory cells [11]. By forming a biofilm, bacteria protect themselves from host defense and antibiotics [53]. The recognition that bacteria can form biofilms within the amniotic cavity is important for both diagnostic and therapeutic reasons. First, the detection of microorganisms in the presence of a biofilm is difficult to isolate by conventional culture methods, which detect only viable bacteria. In the current study, we obtained particulate matter, or sludge, under direct visualization to identify bacteria specific to such material. In some cases, bacteria were not detected by culture, even though there was a suspicion of intraamniotic infection (e.g., pus material, intraamniotic inflammation, and acute placental inflammatory lesions). The frequency of intraamniotic infection may be underestimated in cases with sludge, and molecular microbiologic techniques will be required to identify pathogenic bacteria in amniotic fluid. Second, the optimal treatment of biofilm-related infections represents a challenge given recent evidence that maternal administration of antibiotics can eradicate intraamniotic infection [5459]. Antimicrobial agents appear to be inactivated or fail to reach bacteria within a biofilm. Interestingly, bacteria within biofilms show increased resistance to antimicrobial agents even though the bacteria can be sensitive to the same agents if grown under standard conditions [6062]. Biofilms in the amniotic fluid can be formed by multiple organisms [11]. In the current study, more than one-half of the cases had polymicrobial infection, and genital mycoplasmas (Ureaplasmas species and Mycoplasma hominis) are mainly associated with other microorganisms. This has implications for the selection of optimal antimicrobial agents. Third, biofilms in the amniotic fluid may represent a unique form of these structures that can be dislodged by fetal breathing or swallowing, resulting in the seeding of planktonic bacteria and eliciting the fetal systemic inflammatory response [63,64]. Further research is required to characterize, with specific probes, the microbial constituents of amniotic fluid biofilms.

CONCLUSION

The nature of amniotic fluid particulate material varies as a function of gestational age. The material obtained in preterm gestations was frequently related to an inflammatory process, while that obtained at term was often consistent with vernix and appears to represent a phenomenon related to fetal maturation at term.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported, in part, by the Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS); and, in part, with Federal funds from NICHD/NIH/DHHS under Contract No. HHSN275201300006C.

Footnotes

Dr. Romero has contributed to this work as part of his official duties as an employee of the United States Federal Government.

Disclosure statement: No potential conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bree RL. Sonographic identification of fetal vernix in amniotic fluid. J Clin Ultrasound. 1978. Aug;6(4):269–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Parulekar SG. Ultrasonographic demonstration of floating particles in amniotic fluid. J Ultrasound Med. 1983. Mar;2(3):107–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.DeVore GR, Platt LD. Ultrasound appearance of particulate matter in amniotic cavity: vernix or meconium? J Clin Ultrasound. 1986. Mar-Apr;14(3):229–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sepulveda WH, Quiroz VH. Sonographic detection of echogenic amniotic fluid and its clinical significance. J Perinat Med. 1989;17(5):333–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brown DL, Polger M, Clark PK, et al. Very echogenic amniotic fluid: ultrasonography-amniocentesis correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 1994. Feb;13(2):95–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tam G, Al-Dughaishi T. Case Report and Literature Review of Very Echogenic Amniotic Fluid at Term and Its Clinical Significance. Oman Med J. 2013. Nov;28(6):e060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Benacerraf BR, Gatter MA, Ginsburgh F. Ultrasound diagnosis of meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984. Jul 1;149(5):570–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sherer DM, Abramowicz JS, Smith SA, et al. Sonographically homogeneous echogenic amniotic fluid in detecting meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Obstet Gynecol. 1991. Nov;78(5 Pt 1):819–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Perkes EA, Baim RS, Clair MR, et al. Intrauterine bleeding following transplacental amniocentesis. J Ultrasound Med. 1983;2(2):55–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Espinoza J, et al. What is amniotic fluid ‘sludge’? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007. Oct;30(5):793–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Romero R, Schaudinn C, Kusanovic JP, et al. Detection of a microbial biofilm in intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 1/2008;198(1):135–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gauthier S, Tetu A, Himaya E, et al. The origin of Fusobacterium nucleatum involved in intraamniotic infection and preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011. Nov;24(11):1329–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kusanovic JP, Romero R, Martinovic C, et al. Transabdominal collection of amniotic fluid “sludge” and identification of Candida albicans intraamniotic infection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018. May;31(10):1279–1284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Akiyama M, Kim DK, Main DM, et al. Characteristic morphologic abnormality of harlequin ichthyosis detected in amniotic fluid cells. J Invest Dermatol. 1994. Feb;102(2):210–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Akiyama M, Suzumori K, Shimizu H. Prenatal diagnosis of harlequin ichthyosis by the examination of keratinized hair canals and amniotic fluid cells at 19 weeks’ estimated gestational age. Prenat Diagn. 1999. Feb;19(2):167–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Espinoza J, Goncalves LF, Romero R, et al. The prevalence and clinical significance of amniotic fluid ‘sludge’ in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005. Apr;25(4):346–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kusanovic JP, Espinoza J, Romero R, et al. Clinical significance of the presence of amniotic fluid ‘sludge’ in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007. Oct;30(5):706–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jung EJ, Romero R, Gomez-Lopez N, et al. Cervical insufficiency, amniotic fluid sludge, intraamniotic infection, and maternal bacteremia: the need for a point-of-care test to assess inflammation and bacteria in amniotic fluid. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020. Dec 23:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yeo L, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Resolution of acute cervical insufficiency after antibiotics in a case with amniotic fluid sludge. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021. Feb 17:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hatanaka AR, Mattar R, Kawanami TE, et al. Amniotic fluid “sludge” is an independent risk factor for preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015. Jul 8:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fuchs F, Boucoiran I, Picard A, et al. Impact of amniotic fluid “sludge” on the risk of preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015. Jul;28(10):1176–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Adanir I, Ozyuncu O, Gokmen Karasu AF, et al. Amniotic fluid “sludge”; prevalence and clinical significance of it in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018. Jan;31(2):135–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bujold E, Pasquier JC, Simoneau J, et al. Intraamniotic sludge, short cervix, and risk of preterm delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006. Mar;28(3):198–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vaisbuch E, Romero R, Erez O, et al. Clinical significance of early (< 20 weeks) vs. late (20–24 weeks) detection of sonographic short cervix in asymptomatic women in the mid-trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010. Oct;36(4):471–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vaisbuch E, Romero R, Mazaki-Tovi S, et al. The risk of impending preterm delivery in asymptomatic patients with a nonmeasurable cervical length in the second trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. Nov;203(5):446 e1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Himaya E, Rhalmi N, Girard M, et al. Midtrimester intraamniotic sludge and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Perinatol. 2011. Dec;28(10):815–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ventura W, Nazario C, Ingar J, et al. Risk of impending preterm delivery associated with the presence of amniotic fluid sludge in women in preterm labor with intact membranes. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;30(2):116–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Boyer A, Cameron L, Munoz-Maldonado Y, et al. Clinical significance of amniotic fluid sludge in twin pregnancies with a short cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014. Nov;211(5):506 e1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Paules C, Moreno E, Gonzales A, et al. Amniotic fluid sludge as a marker of intra-amniotic infection and histological chorioamnionitis in cervical insufficiency: a report of four cases and literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(16):2681–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Spiegelman J, Booker W, Gupta S, et al. The Independent Association of a Short Cervix, Positive Fetal Fibronectin, Amniotic Fluid Sludge, and Cervical Funneling with Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Twin Pregnancies. Am J Perinatol. 2016. Oct;33(12):1159–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tsunoda Y, Fukami T, Yoneyama K, et al. The presence of amniotic fluid sludge in pregnant women with a short cervix: an independent risk of preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020. Mar;33(6):920–923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yasuda S, Tanaka M, Kyozuka H, et al. Association of amniotic fluid sludge with preterm labor and histologic chorioamnionitis in pregnant Japanese women with intact membranes: A retrospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020. Jan;46(1):87–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Romero R, Quintero R, Nores J, et al. Amniotic fluid white blood cell count: a rapid and simple test to diagnose microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and predict preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991. Oct;165(4 Pt 1):821–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Romero R, Jimenez C, Lohda AK, et al. Amniotic fluid glucose concentration: a rapid and simple method for the detection of intraamniotic infection in preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990. Sep;163(3):968–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Romero R, Emamian M, Quintero R, et al. The value and limitations of the Gram stain examination in the diagnosis of intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988. Jul;159(1):114–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Romero R, Miranda J, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. A novel molecular microbiologic technique for the rapid diagnosis of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intra-amniotic infection in preterm labor with intact membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014. Apr;71(4):330–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Romero R, Miranda J, Chaemsaithong P, et al. Sterile and microbial-associated intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015. Aug;28(12):1394–409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Madan I, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, et al. The frequency and clinical significance of intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation in women with placenta previa and vaginal bleeding: an unexpected observation. J Perinat Med. 2010. May;38(3):275–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Romero R, Kadar N, Miranda J, et al. The diagnostic performance of the Mass Restricted (MR) score in the identification of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity or intra-amniotic inflammation is not superior to amniotic fluid interleukin-6. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014. May;27(8):757–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Redline RW, Faye-Petersen O, Heller D, et al. Amniotic infection syndrome: Nosology and reproducibility of placental reaction patterns. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2003. Sep-Oct;6(5):435–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Redline RW, Heller D, Keating S, et al. Placental diagnostic criteria and clinical correlation--a workshop report. Placenta. 2005. Apr;26 Suppl A:S114–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Redline RW. Placental pathology: a systematic approach with clinical correlations [Review]. Placenta. 2008. Mar;29 Suppl A:S86–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim CJ, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, et al. Acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis: definition, pathologic features, and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. Oct;213(4 Suppl):S29–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Khong TY, Mooney EE, Ariel I, et al. Sampling and Definitions of Placental Lesions: Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016. Jul;140(7):698–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Romero R, Kim YM, Pacora P, et al. The frequency and type of placental histologic lesions in term pregnancies with normal outcome. J Perinat Med. 2018. Aug 28;46(6):613–630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kim CJ, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, et al. The frequency, clinical significance, and pathological features of chronic chorioamnionitis: a lesion associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Mod Pathol. 2010. Jul;23(7):1000–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Timor-Tritsch IE, Greenebaum E, Monteagudo A, et al. Exencephaly-anencephaly sequence: proof by ultrasound imaging and amniotic fluid cytology. J Matern Fetal Med. 1996. Jul-Aug;5(4):182–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zimmer EZ, Bronshtein M. Ultrasonic features of intraamniotic “unidentified debris’ at 14–16 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996. Mar;7(3):178–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vengalil S, Santolaya-Forgas J, Meyer W, et al. Ultrasonically dense amniotic fluid in early pregnancy in asymptomatic women without vaginal bleeding. A report of two cases. J Reprod Med. 1998. May;43(5):462–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hallak M, Zador IE, Garcia EM, et al. Ultrasound-detected free-floating particles in amniotic fluid: correlation with maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993. Nov-Dec;8(6):402–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yoneda N, Yoneda S, Niimi H, et al. Sludge reflects intraamniotic inflammation with or without microorganisms. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018. Feb;79(2). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rhalmi N, Himaya E, Girard M, et al. Intraamniotic sludge in a woman with asymptomatic cervical dilatation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011. Dec;33(12):1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sharma D, Misba L, Khan AU. Antibiotics versus biofilm: an emerging battleground in microbial communities. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control. 2019 2019/May/16;8(1):76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hassan S, Romero R, Hendler I, et al. A sonographic short cervix as the only clinical manifestation of intraamniotic infection. J Perinat Med. 2006;34(1):13–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lee J, Romero R, Kim SM, et al. A new antibiotic regimen treats and prevents intraamniotic inflammation/infection in patients with preterm PROM. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016. Sep;29(17):2727–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lee J, Romero R, Kim SM, et al. A new anti-microbial combination prolongs the latency period, reduces acute histologic chorioamnionitis as well as funisitis, and improves neonatal outcomes in preterm PROM. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016. Mar;29(5):707–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yoon BH, Romero R, Park JY, et al. Antibiotic administration can eradicate intraamniotic infection or intraamniotic inflammation in a subset of patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. Aug;221(2):142.e1–142.e22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Oh KJ, Romero R, Park JY, et al. Evidence that antibiotic administration is effective in the treatment of a subset of patients with intraamniotic infection/inflammation presenting with cervical insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. Aug;221(2):140.e1–140.e18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kacerovsky M, Romero R, Stepan M, et al. Antibiotic administration reduces the rate of intraamniotic inflammation in preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. Jul;223(1):114.e1–114.e20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001. Jul 14;358(9276):135–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Stewart PS. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofilms. Int J Med Microbiol. 2002. Jul;292(2):107–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Davies D. Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2003. Feb;2(2):114–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kim YM, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Dermatitis as a component of the fetal inflammatory response syndrome is associated with activation of Toll-like receptors in epidermal keratinocytes. Histopathology. 2006 November/2006;49(5):506–514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Jung E, Romero R, Yeo L, et al. The fetal inflammatory response syndrome: the origins of a concept, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and obstetrical implications. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020. Aug;25(4):101146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES