Erratum: Rates of readmission and reoperation after operative management of midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents

Abstract

This is an erratum to an already published paper. We found an error in the results section and Table 1. Specifically, we have revised results with n ≤ 10 to be reflected as such, which is consistent with the reporting instructions by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Please note, these changes do not affect our results, and we had previously listed this requirement in the results section. We apologize for our unintentional mistake.

Core Tip: This is an erratum to an already published paper. We found an error in the results section and Table 1. Specifically, we have revised results with n ≤ 10 to be reflected as such, which is consistent with the reporting instructions by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Please note, these changes do not affect our results, and we had previously listed this requirement in the results section. We apologize for our unintentional mistake.

Table 1.

Adolescent fracture demographics: Reoperation vs no reoperation

Predictor variables		Cohort proportion, %	Cohort total, n	Cohort proportion, %	Cohort total, n	P value
Sex	Male	0.68	36	0.83	229	0.01
	Female	0.32	17	0.17	47
Race	White	0.79	42	0.78	209	0.86
	Hispanic	-	≤ 101	0.12	31
	Black	-	≤ 101	0.05	14
	Other	-	≤ 101	0.05	13
Payer type	Commercial	0.74	39	0.62	175	0.47
	Medicaid	-	≤ 101	0.24	67
	Self-pay	-	≤ 101	0.06	17
	Other	-	≤ 101	0.08	22
State	CA	-	≤ 101	0.20	55	< 0.01
	FL	0.98	52	0.80	226
Median income quartile	0-25th %	-	≤ 101	0.20	42	0.64
	26th-50th %	0.34	16	0.34	70
	51st-75th %	0.28	13	0.29	61
	76th-100th %	0.23	11	0.16	34
Hospital type	Academic	-	≤ 101	0.07	19	0.07
	Children’s	-	≤ 101	-	≤ 101
	Community	0.75	40	0.77	215
	County	-	≤ 101	0.14	38
	Outpatient	-	≤ 101	-	≤ 101
Age	Mean	15.87 ± 1.8	53	16.08 ± 1.7	281	0.41

¹Please note that data with ≤ 10 patients is not reported due to database reporting restrictions.

CA: California; FL: Florida.

TO THE EDITOR

This is an erratum to an already published paper[1]. We found an error in the results section and Table 1. Specifically, we have revised results with n ≤ 10 to be reflected as such, which is consistent with the reporting instructions by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Please note, these changes do not affect our results, and we had previously listed this requirement in the results section. We apologize for our unintentional mistake.