Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To compare (1) the reliability of two expensive and two inexpensive measuring instruments, suitable for use in the community and (2) the reliability of experienced compared with inexperienced observers. DESIGN--(1) Ten children aged 5-12 years were each measured three times blindly, and in random order, by two experienced observers using four different portable instruments. (2) Four groups of four children aged 5-11 years were each measured three times blindly, and in random order by four experienced and one inexperienced measurer, using two different portable instruments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--The precision of height measurements made by different observers using different instruments, expressed in each case as the standard deviation of a single height measurement (SDshm). RESULTS--(1) No significant difference in precision was found between instruments, SDshm ranging from 0.22-0.34 cm. The two observers using apparently the same technique, did however record significantly different absolute heights. (2) No significant difference in precision was found between experienced and inexperienced observers. CONCLUSION--Inexpensive height measuring equipment, once accurately installed, is no less reliable than the most expensive. Inexperienced observers can, with care, measure as reliably as those with long experience. Every effort should be made, however, to ensure that the progress of individual children is monitored not only by the same observer, but on a long term basis.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ahmed M. L., Allen A. D., Sharma A., Macfarlane J. A., Dunger D. B. Evaluation of a district growth screening programme: the Oxford Growth Study. Arch Dis Child. 1993 Sep;69(3):361–365. doi: 10.1136/adc.69.3.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed M. L., Yudkin P. L., Macfarlane J. A., McPherson K., Dunger D. B. Are measurements of height made by health visitors sufficiently accurate for routine screening of growth? Arch Dis Child. 1990 Dec;65(12):1345–1348. doi: 10.1136/adc.65.12.1345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Betts P. R., Voss L. D., Bailey B. J. Measuring the heights of very young children. BMJ. 1992 May 23;304(6838):1351–1352. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6838.1351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green A. A., MacFarlane J. A. Method for the earlier recognition of abnormal stature. Arch Dis Child. 1983 Jul;58(7):535–537. doi: 10.1136/adc.58.7.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milner R. D. Which children should have growth hormone therapy? Lancet. 1986 Mar 1;1(8479):483–485. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92938-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voss L. D., Bailey B. J., Cumming K., Wilkin T. J., Betts P. R. The reliability of height measurement (the Wessex Growth Study). Arch Dis Child. 1990 Dec;65(12):1340–1344. doi: 10.1136/adc.65.12.1340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voss L. D., Mulligan J., Betts P. R., Wilkin T. J. Poor growth in school entrants as an index of organic disease: the Wessex growth study. BMJ. 1992 Dec 5;305(6866):1400–1402. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6866.1400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voss L. D., Wilkin T. J., Bailey B. J., Betts P. R. The reliability of height and height velocity in the assessment of growth (the Wessex Growth Study) Arch Dis Child. 1991 Jul;66(7):833–837. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.7.833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]