Skip to main content
Society for Reproduction and Fertility Open Access logoLink to Society for Reproduction and Fertility Open Access
. 2023 Jun 9;166(1):37–53. doi: 10.1530/REP-22-0367

SHP2 participates in decidualization by activating ERK to maintain normal nuclear localization of progesterone receptor

Lin Chen 1,, Weijie Zhao 1,2,, Mengxiong Li 3, Yazhu Yang 1, Chengzi Tian 1, Dengyang Zhang 4, Zhiguang Chang 4, Yunzhe Zhang 5, Zhizhuang Joe Zhao 4,6,, Yun Chen 4, Lin Ma 1,
PMCID: PMC10304905  PMID: 37184079

Abstract

In brief

The establishment and maintenance of embryo implantation and pregnancy require decidualization of endometrial stromal cells. This paper reveals that SHP2 ensures the correct subcellular localization of progesterone receptor, thereby safeguarding the process of decidualization.

Abstract

Decidualization is the process of conversion of endometrial stromal cells into decidual stromal cells, which is caused by progesterone production that begins during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and then increases throughout pregnancy dedicated to support embryonic development. Decidualization deficiency is closely associated with various pregnancy complications, such as recurrent miscarriage (RM). Here, we reported that Src-homology-2-containing phospho-tyrosine phosphatase (SHP2), a key regulator in the signal transduction process downstream of various receptors, plays an indispensable role in decidualization. SHP2 expression was upregulated during decidualization. SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 and shRNA-mediated SHP2 reduction resulted in a decreased level of phosphorylation of ERK and aberrant cytoplasmic localization of progesterone receptor (PR), coinciding with reduced expression of IGFBP1 and various other target genes of decidualization. Solely inhibiting ERK activity recapitulated these observations. Administration of RMC-4550 led to decidualization deficiency and embryo absorption in mice. Moreover, reduced expression of SHP2 was detected in the decidua of RM patients. Our results revealed that SHP2 is key to PR's nuclear localization, thereby indispensable for decidualization and that reduced expression of SHP2 might be engaged in the pathogenesis of RM.

Introduction

The establishment and maintenance of decidualization are vital for successful embryo implantation and the subsequent maintenance of a healthy pregnancy (Ng et al. 2020). During decidualization, the blastocyst adheres to the endometrial epithelium, and endometrial stromal cells (ESCs) around the blastocyst differentiate into round epithelioid cells, namely, specialized secretory decidual cells (Ochoa-Bernal & Fazleabas 2020). Moreover, ESCs undergo orderly proliferation and apoptosis, accompanied by the formation of polyploid cells and neovascularization (Gellersen et al. 2007). This morphological differentiation and high metabolic state prepare ESCs for subsequent embryo implantation (Zhang et al. 2013b ). Abnormal decidualization allows embryo implantation without selectivity but cannot maintain pregnancy, which is closely related to abnormal tolerance of the maternal–fetal interface and recurrent miscarriage (RM) (Larsen et al. 2013). In-depth studies of the factors affecting the biological behavior of ESCs metaplasia will help to clarify the pathogenesis of RM and provide an important basis for finding more effective and accurate treatment methods.

RM is a common complication of pregnancy that affects the physical and mental health of pregnant women (Rai & Regan 2006). According to the guidelines of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, RM is defined as two or more early abortions (Gynecologists 1995). Repeated embryo loss may lead to endometrial injury, endometritis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and infertility, which pose a serious threat to women’s reproductive health (Quenby et al. 2021). The common causes of RM include advanced maternal age, uterine abnormalities, immune disorders, hormone and metabolic disorders, environmental factors, and cytogenetic abnormalities (Toth et al. 2010). However, less than 50% of RM couples are diagnosed with a definite cause (Toth et al. 2010). Previous studies have shown that decidualization damage is related to the pathogenesis of RM (Larsen et al. 2013).

Src homology-2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-2 (SHP2) is an important regulator of cell growth and differentiation and many signal transduction, which is widely expressed in various tissues (Feng 2007, Zhang et al. 2022b ), especially in female reproductive tissues, as shown in Fig. 1E. Previous studies have shown that SHP2 is necessary for the Ras–ERK and PI3K–Akt pathways and plays a dynamic role in gametogenesis, embryo maturation, and embryonic development (Yuan et al. 2020). SHP2 can directly activate Ras by dephosphorylating p120Ras and can indirectly activate Ras by dephosphorylating KRAS, NRAS, and HRA through Src family kinases (SFKs) (Liu et al. 2021). SHP2 can also dephosphorylate substrate proteins important for activating the PI3K–Akt pathway, such as dephosphorizing Gab1 at the p85 binding site and terminating the Gab1/PI3K positive loop (Yu et al. 2002). SHP2 can also be regulated by Ras–ERK and PI3K–Akt pathway α-catenin dephosphorylation (Timmerman et al. 2012). SHP2 plays an important role in embryonic development and can induce trophoblast stem cell apoptosis by regulating FGF4-induced SFK–RAS–ERK signal transduction and inhibiting Bcl-2-like protein 11 (Bim) (Yang et al. 2006). Additionally, at embryo implantation, ESC nucleus SHP2 enhances its Tyr phosphorylation and dephosphorylates inhibitory Tyr in Src kinase, and ER-α recruits its target gene to activate ER-α (Ran et al. 2017). SHP2 is also associated with decidualization (Cheng et al. 2022), but the specific regulatory mechanism is not clear. At present, there is no study on the decidualization of the endometrium using SHP2 inhibitors, and the guiding role for RM patients is not clear. In the present study, we further explored the SHP2–ERK–PR signaling pathway, which is differentially expressed in the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550-exposed hESCs, RMC-4550-treated pregnant mice and RM tissues, to explore the roles of SHP2 in the regulation of this signaling pathway, to discover the mechanisms underlying the occurrence of miscarriage and decidual dysfunction caused by abortion and SHP2 deficiency and to provide a novel scientific and clinical understanding of the occurrence of miscarriage.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Artificially induced decidualization leads to the upregulation of SHP2 in hESCs. (A) Real-time PCR analysis of the transcriptional levels of SHP2, IGFBP1, and PRL in hESCs treated with MPA and db-cAMP for 4 days. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 3). Data were calibrated to the most highly expressing sample in hESCs (red color). (B) Immunoblotting of the protein level of SHP2 in hESCs treated with MPA and db-cAMP for 4 days. Bar figures represent the ratios of densities (SHP2/B-actin). Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 3). (C) Real-time PCR analysis of the transcriptional levels of SHP2 in ESCs and DSCs. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 10). Data were calibrated to the most highly expressing sample in ESCs (red color). (D) Immunoblotting of the protein level of SHP2 in ESCs and DSCs. Bar figures represent the ratios of densities (SHP2/B-actin). Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 5). (E) Bar graph of SHP2 expression across human tissues. Red box indicates SHP2 expression in female reproductive tissues. Data were obtained from the Human Protein Atlas. ***P < 0.001.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Immortalized human ESCs (hESCs) were cultured in phenol red-free F12 medium containing 10% carbon-adsorbed serum (D-FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37°C in 5% CO2.

Lentiviral shRNA transduction

Lentivirus-mediated SHP2 knockdown was performed as described previously (Stewart et al. 2003). Lentivirus‐mediated small hairpin RNA against SHP2 (sequence of sh-SHP2: CGCTAAGAGAACTTAAACTTT) and the non-target control (sequence of sh-Ctrl: CCTAAGGTTAAGTCGCCCTCG) were designed and constructed by OBio (Shanghai, China). Approximately 1 × 105 cells/well were cultured in each of a 6-well plate, until a confluence of 70–80%. After replacing the cell culture medium with polystyrene-containing medium, sh-Ctrl or sh-SHP2 lentiviral particles were added and incubated for 6 hours. Subsequently, the medium was refreshed with fresh medium, and the cells were cultured for 72 hours before further treatments were conducted. SHP2 knockdown was confirmed by qPCR and western blotting.

Cell treatment

To induce decidualization, hESCs were incubated with 1 μM MPA (Targetmol) and 0.5 mM db-cAMP (Targetmol). Subsequently, the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 (Selleck) was added in the process of decidualization induction or hESCs knocked down SHP2 were used for decidualization induction. Decidualization was verified by the changes in cell morphology from a fibroblastic to a round shape, as observed with light microscopy, and five randomly selected microscopic fields in each group were used to calculate the relative ratio of round cells. To observe the translocation of PR, hESCs cells were treated with 2 μM P4 (Targetmol) and SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 (Selleck) or hESCs knocked down SHP2 were treated with 2 μM P4 (Targetmol). Concurrently, the MEK inhibitor trametinib (MCE) or ERK inhibitor U0126 (M Millipore) was added in the process of the translocation of PR. The PR translocation ratio was calculated as percentage of nuclear PR cells in five randomly selected microscopic fields.

Tissue collection and primary cell isolation

All volunteers provided informed written consent, and the study received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Proliferative endometrial tissues were obtained from women with normal menstrual cycles via endometrial biopsy at the time of diagnostic hysteroscopy. Primary human ESCs were isolated according to previously described methods (Zhang et al. 2018). Briefly, endometrial tissues were fully washed with PBS and then minced in DMEM/F12. Minced tissues were digested with collagenase type IV for 1 h at 37°C. The suspension was filtered through 100-μm and 40-μm sterile filters and centrifuged at 300 g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was suspended in DMEM/F12 with 10% FBS. First-trimester (gestational age 6–10 weeks) human decidual tissues were obtained from clinically healthy controls (HCs, diagnosed as healthy pregnancies terminated for non-medical reasons) and RMs (diagnosed as recurrent spontaneous abortion, inclusion criteria included the presence of two or more consecutive abortions, and excluding parental and fetal genetic abnormalities, anatomic abnormalities, endocrine abnormalities, infection, etc.). Primary human decidual stromal cells (DSCs) were isolated according to previously described methods (Lv et al. 2019). Briefly, decidual tissues were obtained from HCs or RMs, and then the samples were washed in PBS and minced in DMEM/F12. The remaining tissues were embedded in paraffin, frozen, and transferred to liquid nitrogen for storage and further analysis.

Human Protein Atlas

The Human Protein Atlas (www.proteinatlas.org) provides tissue and cell distribution information for all 24,000 human proteins through free public enquiries. We obtained SHP2 protein expression data in normal tissues for this study (Uhlen et al. 2005).

SHP2 immunoprecipitation and PTP assays

SHP2-specific PTP assays were performed as described previously (Tzouvelekis et al. 2017). Briefly, hESCs treated with DMSO, 5 μM RMC-4550, or 10 μM RMC-4550 were lysed in RIPA buffer. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-SHP2 antibody or irrelevant control antibody. Immunoprecipitates were collected with Protein A agarose and washed extensively in RIPA buffer. The phosphatase activity protocol was adapted from McAvoy (McAvoy & Nairn 2010). Briefly, eluted proteins were added in triplicate in a 96‐well plate-containing PTP assay buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 2 mM DTT, 1 mM EDTA) and 5 mM pNPP (New England Biolabs) in a final volume of 100 µL. The plate was incubated for 1 h at 37°C, and the reaction was stopped by the addition of NaOH for a final concentration of 1 N. The plate was then read at 405 nm in a BioTek SYNERGY H1. Assay was done in triplicate wells, and the experiment was repeated three times.

Western blot analysis

Total protein extracts were prepared from homogenate tissues or cells cultured in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors. The same amount of protein was separated by SDS‒PAGE before wet transfer to PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Immunoreactivity was visualized by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibodies and treatment with enhanced chemiluminescence reagents.

Real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted with the SteadyPure Universal RNA Extraction Kit (AG) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of the RNA were assessed using a spectrophotometer. Five hundred nanograms of total RNA was reverse transcribed using an Evo M-MLV RT Premix for qPCR Kit (AG), and the resulting cDNA was used as a template for qPCR. Each 20 μL qPCR system contained 2 μL cDNA, 1 μL forward primer (10 μM), 1 μL reverse primer (10 μM), 6 μL RNase-free ddH2O, and 10 μL SYBR Green Pro Taq HS Premix (AG). The primer sequences used are listed in Table 1. The samples were triplicated on the same plate. A standard curve was generated by using 10-fold serial dilutions (107 to 10 copies), and standard curve correlation coefficients were greater than 0.98, with a mean coefficient of variation of 8%. The control wells had RNase-free ddH2O instead of cDNA and were routinely performed as negative controls. After incubation for 2 min at 50°C and a denaturation step of 2 min at 95°C, the samples were subjected to 44 cycles (15 s at 95°C, 1 min at 60°C), followed by the acquisition of the melting curve to verify the presence of a single amplicon. The qPCR was performed using Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time system. The primer efficiencies (E) were assessed through 10-fold standard dilution of cDNA (107 to 10 copies) using the equation of E = 10−1/slope − 1 and were determined to be between 1.9 and 2.0. The specificity of each assay was validated by melting curve analysis, agarose gel electrophoresis, and Sanger sequencing of the PCR products. Data were analyzed using the ΔCT method. Target gene expression was normalized to ACTB (human) or Gapdh (mouse) by taking the difference between CT values for target genes and ACTB (human) or Gapdh (mouse) (ΔCT value). These values were then calibrated to that of the most highly expressing sample in control (defined according to experimental designs) to give the ΔΔCT value. The fold target gene expression is given by the formula: 2−ΔΔCT. Experiments were performed three separate times. RT-qPCR was performed following the MIQE guidelines (Bustin et al. 2009).

Table 1.

Primer sequences used for real-time PCR.

Gene Forward Reverse
SHP2 TGGTCCAGACAGAAGCACAG GGCTCTGATCTCCACTCGTC
IGFBP1 TGCTGCAGAGGCAGGGAGCCC AGGGATCCTCTTCCCATTCCA
PRL CATCAACAGCTGCCACACTT CGTTTGGTTTGCTCCTCAAT
FOXO1 CCGAGCTGCCAAGAAGAAAG ATGCACATCCCCTTCTCCAA
HOXA10 TCACCAAGGCCAGCACATAG TTAACTCAAGCTGCCTCGCC
CEBPB AACTCTCTGCTTCTCCCTCTG TGCGTCAGTCCCGTGTAC
STAT3 CTCCACTGGTCTATCTCTATC ACTTGGTCTTCAGGTATGG
HAND2 ATGAGTCTGGTAGGTGGTTTTCC CATACTCGGGGCTGTAGGACA
PLZF GAGATCCTCTTCCACCGCAAT CCGCATACAGCAGGTCATC
HSD11B1 TGGCTTATCATCTGGCGAAGA AGGCAGTGGGATACCACCT
BMP2 AATGCAAGCAGGTGGGAAAG GCTGTGTTCATCTTGGTGCA
ACTB GGGAAATCGTGCGTGACATTAAG TGTGTTGGCGTACAGGTCTTTG
Dtprp TTATGGGTGCATGGATCACTCC CCCACGTAAGGTCATCATGGAT
Hand2 AGATCAAGAAGACCGACGTGA CTGTCCGGCCTTTGGTTTTC
Hoxa10 CCTAGAGATCAGCCGTAG GACGTTGTCTGGAAGTTT
Bmp2 GAGAAAAGCGTCAAGCCAAAC GGTGCCACGATCCAGTCATT
Gapdh AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG GGGGTCGTTGATGGCAACA

Immunohistochemistry

All volunteers provided informed written consent, and the study received ethical approval from the research ethics committee of the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. First-trimester (gestational age 6–10 weeks) human decidua was obtained from RM (inclusion criteria included the presence of two or more consecutive abortions, and excluding parental and fetal genetic abnormalities, anatomic abnormalities, endocrine abnormalities, infection, etc.) and normal pregnancies (terminated for nonmedical reasons). Decidual tissues were obtained immediately after surgery. Decidual specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and then embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections (5 μm) were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies. After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody; then, the reaction was developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine and counterstained with hematoxylin. The relative protein expression was quantified by ImagePro Plus version 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA) and defined as follows: mean IOD = IOD sum/area sum. The IOD, as the positive-staining density, was measured as reported previously.

Immunofluorescence staining

HESCs grown on coverslips were fixed with absolute methanol at room temperature for 20 min. After two washes with PBS, the cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in 1× PBS for 30 min and blocked with PBS containing 3% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were then sequentially incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C and with a fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Immunofluorescence staining of human decidua tissue in frozen sections and mouse decidual tissue in the paraffin section was performed in the same steps. The sections were observed under a Leica fluorescence microscope. Information about the antibodies utilized is provided in Table 2. Images of IF were analyzed by Image-Pro Plus version 6.3. The number of positive cells was determined by using the count feature in the software. The red color is used to represent positive cells, and the blue color is used to represent the nucleus and thus indicate the total number of cells.

Table 2.

Primary antibody used in the assay of western blotting (WB), immunofluorescence (IF), immunofluorescence (IF), immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunoprecipitation (IP).

Antibody Cat. No. RRID Dilution Company
WB IF IHC IP
SHP2 3397 AB_2174959 1:1000 1:50 1:50 1:100 Cell Signaling Technology
IGFBP1 31025 AB_2798998 1:1000 Cell Signaling Technology
PRL ab188229 AB_2921370 1:1000 Abcam
p-ERK 4370 AB_2315112 1:1000 Cell Signaling Technology
ERK 4695 AB_390779 1:1000 Cell Signaling Technology
B-actin 12620 AB_2797972 1:1000 Cell Signaling Technology
FOXO1 ab52857 AB_869817 1:100 Abcam
PR AF6106 AB_2834993 1:100 Affinity Biosciences

Cat. No., catalog number; RRID, research resource identifier.

Animal study

All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Shenzhen Graduate School of Peking University, were approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Shenzhen Graduate School of Peking University, and complied with the Guidelines for the Care and Application of Experimental Animals published by the National Institutes of Health. Animals were housed in specific pathogen-free facilities at the Peking University Shen Zhen Graduate School. Female C57BL/6 mice aged 6–8 weeks in estrus were bred with male C57BL/6 mice aged 8–10 weeks, and the day when vaginal plugging was observed was considered gestational day 1 (GD1). On GD5 and GD6, pregnant mice were anesthetized at 09:00 h and 21:00 h, and corn oil with and without RMC-4550 was injected into the abdominal cavity of each mouse. On GD7, mice were dissected, the uterus was weighed, the implantation sites were counted, and the embryo absorption rates were calculated. The absorbed embryos were identified by their smaller size and darker than the larger, viable, pink, healthy embryos. The embryo absorption rates were calculated as follows: (number of absorbed embryos/(total number of embryos)) × 100 (Wang et al. 2014, Wolfson et al. 2015). The first part of the was used to isolate mouse decidual stromal cells (mDSCs), and the second part of which was fixed with 4% PFA and then used to make paraffin sections, and the rest was transferred to liquid nitrogen for storage.

HE staining in paraffin sections

The mouse uterus tissue samples were fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C. After fixation, samples were washed with 70% ethanol. Washed samples were processed and embedded in paraffin. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining was performed on 5-μm paraffin sections. Primary antibodies and dilutions used are listed in Table 2 below.

HE staining was conducted according to routine protocols (Liu et al. 2017). Briefly, put the slices into toluene I and toluene II for treatment, then soak them in different concentrations of alcohol, wash the alcohol with distilled water, and put the cleaned slices into HE staining solution (Beyotime) to dye the nucleus and cytoplasm, and finally dehydrate and seal the slices. The mounted slides were then photographed using the Leica DM4B system and KFBIO Digital Pathology Section 198 Scanner.

Isolate mouse decidual stromal cells (mDSCs)

The mDSCs| were isolated as described previously (Li et al. 2007). Briefly, uterine horns were dissected and cut into 3- to 5-mm pieces. The uterine tissues were placed in HBSS containing dispase (Invitrogen) and pancreatin (Sigma) for 1 h at room temperature and then 10 min at 37°C. The supernatant was discarded to remove the endometrial epithelial clumps. The digested tissue was thoroughly washed with HBSS (Sigma). Subsequently, it was incubated in HBSS supplemented with collagenase I (Sigma) at a temperature of 37°C for a duration of 45 minutes. The resulting digested content was then passed through sterile filters with pore sizes of 70 μm and 40 μm. The stromal cells in the filtrate were pelleted, resuspended in DMEM-F12 medium containing 5% BSA, then centrifuged, and cell precipitates were used for subsequent experiments.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± s.d. of at least three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 software. Differences between the two samples were conducted using an unpaired Student’s t-test when the data met a normal distribution, otherwise, the Mann–Whitney U test will be used. For comparisons of more than two groups, a one-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey test was performed. P < 0.05 shows statistical significance.

Results

SHP2 is upregulated during decidualization

To further investigate the role of SHP2 in decidualization, we used hESCs to induce decidualization. Specifically, we used db-cAMP and MPA to induce decidualization of hESCs for 4 days and observed that the expression levels of SHP2 mRNA (Fig. 1A) and protein (Fig. 1B) were significantly increased compared with those in the control. Notably, the mRNA levels of endometrial decidualization biomarkers (IGFBP1 and PRL) in induced cells also increased significantly (Fig. 1A).

In addition, consistent with our data from hESCs, we found that the expression of SHP2 at the mRNA and protein levels was significantly upregulated in DSCs derived from decidual tissues of early pregnancy compared with ESCs derived from normal hyperplastic endometrium (Fig. 1C and D). Using data from the human protein atlas (Uhlen et al. 2015), we also found that SHP2 has endometrium-enriched gene expression (Fig. 1E). Overall, these results supported that SHP2 may be involved in decidualization.

The SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 and knockdown of SHP2 attenuate decidualization

To examine how SHP2 affects the decidualization of the endometrium, we treated db-cAMP- and MPA-induced hESCs with an SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 to inhibit SHP2 function. The efficacy of this compound was confirmed in vitro using a PTP assay (Fig. 2A), which is consistent with previous reports (Nichols et al. 2018, Bracht et al. 2019). The SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 concentrations used were those previously reported in the literature (Lu et al. 2020, Quintana et al. 2020, Kano et al. 2021, Zhou et al. 2022). We noted that the expression of the decidualization markers IGFBP1 and PRL was significantly inhibited by additional RMC-4550 in decidualization-induced hESCs (Fig. 2B and C). We also found that the addition of RMC-4550 during decidualization resulted in morphological differences between db-cAMP and MPA-treated hESCs. Although control cells were enlarged and spherical on Day 4 of induction, the morphology of the additional RMC-4550-treated cells remained fibroblast-like (Fig. 2D and E), clearly indicating that inhibition of SHP2 blocks the extensive cellular morphological reprogramming that occurs during decidualization. Simultaneously, RMC-4550 significantly decreased the mRNA expression of FOXO1, HOXA10, CEBPB, and STAT3, four transcription factors that are known to be essential for decidualization (Fig. 2F). These results suggested that SHP2 may be involved in the regulation of decidualization of ESCs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

RMC-4550 and SHP2 knockdown inhibit artificially induced decidualization in hESCs. (A) SHP2 activity assay was performed. The hESCs were incubated for 1 h with or without RMC-4550. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 3). (B) Real-time PCR analysis of the transcriptional levels of IGFBP1 and PRL in hESCs with or without induced decidualization or treatment with RMC-4550. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 3). Data were calibrated to the most highly expressing sample in hESCs (yellow color). (C) Immunoblotting of IGFBP1 and PRL protein levels in hESCs with or without induced decidualization or treatment with RMC-4550. Bar figures represent the ratios of densities (IGFBP1/B-actin and PRL/B-actin). Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 3). (D–E) The morphology of hESCs after decidualization with and without RMC-4550 treatment. The number of round cells from five different fields was counted and plotted as a histogram. Bar figures represent the ratios of round cells. Scale bars = 50 μm. (F) Real-time PCR analysis of the transcriptional levels of FOXO1, HOXA10, CEBPB, and STAT3 in hESCs with or without induced decidualization or treatment with RMC-4550. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 3). Data were calibrated to the most highly expressing sample in hESCs-4d (red color). (G) Real-time PCR analysis of the transcriptional levels of SHP2, IGFBP1, and PRL in hESCs, in which decidualization was induced for 4 days after transfection with sh-SHP2 or sh-Ctrl for 72 h. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 3). Data were calibrated to the most highly expressing sample in sh-Ctrl (red color). (H) Immunoblotting of SHP2, IGFBP1, and PRL protein levels in hESCs, in which decidualization was induced for 4 days after transfection with sh-SHP2 or sh-Ctrl for 72 h. Bar figures represent the ratios of densities (SHP2/B-actin, IGFBP1/B-actin, and PRL/B-actin). Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 3). (I–J) The morphology of hESCs after decidualization, in which decidualization was induced for 4 days after transfection with sh-SHP2 or sh-Ctrl for 72 h. The number of round cells from five different fields were counted and plotted as histogram. Bar figures represent the ratios of round cells. Scale bars = 50 μm. K. Real-time PCR analysis of SHP2 and the transcriptional levels of FOXO1, HOXA10, CEBPB and STAT3 in hESCs, in which decidualization was induced for 4 days after transfection with sh-SHP2 or sh-Ctrl for 72 h. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 3). Data were calibrated to the most highly expressing sample in sh-Ctrl (red color). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

In order to further examine the effect of SHP2 on endometrial decidualization, we transfected hESCs with sh-SHP2 to knockdown SHP2 in db-cAMP and MPA-induced hESCs. Knockdown of SHP2 apparently attenuated the decidualization of hESCs, as verified by the reduced expression of IGFBP1 and PRL during induction (Fig. 2G and H). The sh-SHP2 induced group cells still retained a fibroblast-like shape, while the sh-Ctrl induced group cells changed into enlarged and spherical like morphology were observed (Fig. 2I and J). As critical transcriptional factors for decidualization, FOXO1, HOXA10, CEBPB, and STAT3 were found to be downregulated during decidualization in sh-SHP2-treated cells (Fig. 2K). These results further suggest that SHP2 may participate in the regulation of decidualization of ESCs.

RMC-4550 impairs decidualization in pregnant mice

We further verified the roles of SHP2 in decidualization in a pregnant mouse model. Mice in estrus (Fig. 3A) were selected for the experiment. The day when the vaginal plug was seen was recorded as GD1 of pregnancy. On GD5 and GD6 of pregnancy, RMC-4550 dissolved in corn oil was injected into the abdominal cavity of mice twice a day, and normal corn oil was injected into control mice (Fig. 3B). We dissected and weighed the mice on GD7 of pregnancy and found that RMC-4550 significantly reduced the decidualization of mice (Fig. 3C), the weights of the RMC-4550-treated mouse uteri (Fig. 3D) and the number of implantation sites (Fig. 3E) were significantly lower than those of the control group. Whereas, intraperitoneal RMC-4550 injection increased the embryo absorption rate (Fig. 3F). The histomorphology of the uterus was evaluated by HE staining (Fig. 3G). HE staining showed that the columnar epithelial structure of the decidua in the corn oil injection control group covered the surface of the uterine cavity completely and stromal cells in the decidua were rich in white lipid droplets, while the columnar epithelial structure was disorganized and stromal cells in the RMC-4550 treatment group contained less lipid droplets. In addition, this was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining of the mouse uterus sections with FOXO1, a known decidualization marker, as we observed a decreased expression of FOXO1 in the RMC-4550 treatment group (Fig. 3H and I). And the RMC-4550-treated mouse decidualization marker Dtprp was also significantly reduced (Fig. 3J). Furthermore, we also found that compared with the control group, the RMC-4550 group also exhibited decreased mRNA expression levels of Hand2 (Fig. 3K), Hoxa10 (Fig. 3L) and Bmp2 (Fig. 3M), the downstream target genes of mouse uterine progesterone signaling. Altogether, these results demonstrated that SHP2 may be involved in the regulation of decidualization of the mouse endometrium and may play an important role in the maintenance of PR function.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

RMC-4550 inhibits decidualization of ESCs in pregnant mice. (A) A representative image of the smear of vaginal exfoliated cells stained with Giemsa from a mouse in estrus. Mice in estrus were selected for the in vivo study. Scale bars = 50 μm. (B) The schema of the animal study. (C) The morphology of uteri from RMC-4550-treated mice or corn oil-treated mice as controls. Scale bars = 1 cm. (D–F) The weights of uteri and the number of implantation sites and the embryo absorption rate from RMC-4550-treated mice or corn oil-treated mice as controls. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 6). (G) HE staining in paraffin sections of mouse uterus tissues from corn oil-treated mice and RMC-4550-treated mice. Scale bars = 50 μm. (H–I) Immunofluorescent staining of FOXO1 in paraffin sections of mouse uterus tissues from corn oil-treated mice and RMC-4550-treated mice. Bar figures represent the ratios of positive area/field of view. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 5). Scale bar=50 μm. (J–K) Real-time PCR analysis of the transcriptional levels of the mouse decidualization marker Dtprp and mouse PR downstream target genes Hand2, Hoxa10, and Bmp2 in mDSCs from mice treated with RMC-4550 or corn oil as controls. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 3). Data were calibrated to the most highly expressing sample in corn oil (red color). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

RMC-4550 impairs nucleocytoplasmic translocation of progesterone receptor (PR) and decreases PR target genes

Decidual tissue maintains pregnancy mainly through the function of PR, in which PR plays important roles during the process of ESCs decidualization. To explore the effect of SHP2 on the function of PR, hESCs and shRNA-mediated SHP2 reduction of hESCs were stimulated with P4 and/or RMC-4550. The results demonstrated that nucleocytoplasmic translocation of PR was both blocked in RMC-4550-treated cells (Fig. 4A and B) and in shRNA-mediated SHP2 reduction of hESCs (Fig. 4C and D), which indicated that SHP2 may be involved in the functional regulation of PR. In addition, we also observed a significant decrease in the mRNA expression of PR downstream target genes, such as HAND2 (Fig. 4E), PLZF (Fig. 4F), HSD11B (Fig. 4G), and BMP2 (Fig. 4H), in induced cells with additional RMC-4550 treatment. These data implied that SHP2 may be involved in maintaining the normal function of PR.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

RMC-4550 inhibits the nuclear translocation of PR and the expression of PR target genes in hESCs treated with P4. (A–B) Immunofluorescent staining of PR (red) in hESCs stimulated with P4 (2  μM) with or without RMC-4550 treatment for 1 h. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). The number of nuclear PR cells from five different fields was counted and plotted as a histogram. Bar figures represent the ratios of nuclear PR. Scale bar = 50 µm; 10 μm (magnified graphs). (C–D) Immunofluorescent staining of PR (red) in hESCs, in which stimulated with P4 (2 μM) for 1 h, after transfection with sh-SHP2 or sh-Ctrl for 72 h. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). The number of nuclear PR cells from five different fields was counted and plotted as a histogram. Bar figures represent the ratios of nuclear PR. Scale bar = 50 µm; 10 μm (magnified graphs). (E–H) Real-time PCR analysis of the transcriptional levels of the PR target genes HAND2, PLZF, HSD11B, and BMP2 in hESCs treated with or without P4 with or without RMC-4550. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 3). Data were calibrated to the most highly expressing sample in blank control (yellow color). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

RMC-4550 inhibits the activation of ERK, which is required for the nuclear localization of PR in P4-treated hESCs

The function of PR is realized through the translocation of PR from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where it then participates in the transcriptional regulation of target genes. To further explore the regulatory mechanism of SHP2 on PR function, the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550-treated hESCs or shRNA-mediated SHP2 reduction of hESCs were treated with P4 or db-cAMP and MPA. Adding RMC-4550 or shRNA-mediated SHP2 reduction reduced the level of ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 5A and B). Simultaneously, we observed that the MEK inhibitor trametinib or ERK inhibitor U0126 could also reduce the level of ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 5C and D) and block the nuclear cytoplasmic translocation of PR (Fig. 5E and F) in hESCs treated with P4. The MEK inhibitor trametinib (Zhou et al. 2018, Ma et al. 2019, Tang et al. 2021) and ERK inhibitor U0126 (Liu et al. 2020, Ranall et al. 2010, Zhang et al. 2013a ) concentrations used were those previously reported in the literature. These data suggested that SHP2 may be involved in maintaining the normal function of PR by regulating the activation of ERK. Taking these data together, we suggest that the upregulation of SHP2 is part of the decidualization process and that the upregulation of SHP2 is involved in decidualization by maintaining normal nuclear localization of PR.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

RMC-4550 or SHP2 knockdown inhibits the activation of ERK, which is required for nuclear localization of PR in P4-treated hESCs. (A–B) Immunoblotting of the phosphorylation levels of ERK and total ERK in hESCs stimulated with or without P4 /db-cAMP+MPA and with or without RMC-4550 treatment/SHP2 knockdown. Bar figures represent the ratios of densities (pERK/ERK). Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 3). (C–D) Immunoblotting of the phosphorylation levels of ERK and total ERK in hESCs stimulated with P4 and with or without MEK inhibitor trametinib/ERK inhibitor U0126 treatment. Bar figures represent the ratios of densities (pERK/ERK). Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 3). (E–F) Immunofluorescent staining of PR (red) in hESCs stimulated with P4 and with or without MEK inhibitor trametinib or ERK inhibitor U0126 treatment. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). The number of nuclear PR cells from five different fields was counted and plotted as histogram. Bar figures represent the ratios of nuclear PR. Scale bar = 50 µm; 10 μm (magnified graphs). ***P < 0.001.

SHP2 expression is decreased in the decidual tissues of RM patients

We further detected the expression of SHP2 in the decidua of RM. We first performed real-time PCR and western blot analysis of decidual tissues from early pregnancy in patients with RM and HC. SHP2 expression was downregulated significantly in the decidual tissue of patients with RM (Fig. 6A and B). Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis of paraffin-embedded decidual tissue (Fig. 6C and D) and immunofluorescent staining analysis of frozen sections of decidual tissue (Fig. 6E and F) also showed that the expression of SHP2 in RM decidual tissue was significantly lower than that in HC decidual tissue. These data further elucidate the relationship between SHP2 and RM.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

SHP2 is downregulated in the decidua of patients with RM. (A) Real-time PCR analysis of the transcriptional level of SHP2 in decidual tissues from donors with normal pregnancies and patients with RM. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 10). Data were calibrated to the most highly expressing sample in HC (red color). (B) Immunoblotting of the protein level of SHP2 in decidual tissues from donors with normal pregnancies and patients with RM. Bar figures represent the ratios of densities (SHP2/B-actin). Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 5). (C–D) Immunohistochemistry staining of SHP2 in paraffin sections of decidual tissues from donors with normal pregnancies and patients with RM. Brown staining represents the target protein. Arrowheads indicate the decidual stromal cells. Bar figures represent IOD. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 5). Scale bar = 50 μm. (E–F) Immunofluorescent staining of SHP2 in frozen sections of decidual tissues from donors with normal pregnancies and patients with RM. Bar figures represent the ratios of positive area/field of view. Error bars denote the s.d. (n = 5). Scale bar=50 μm;10 μm (magnified graphs). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Discussion

Decidualization is essential for embryo implantation and pregnancy maintenance (Zhang et al. 2022a ). Decidualized ESCs can be used as a sensor of embryo quality after implantation (Sandra et al. 2011). Normal decidualization rejects the implantation of low-quality embryos and leads to rapid death through shedding similar to menstruation, which is a natural embryo selection mechanism that limits the mother’s investment in pregnancy with impaired development (Weimar et al. 2012). Abnormal decidualization allows decidual implantation without selectivity but cannot maintain pregnancy (Teklenburg et al. 2010). In the present study, we proved that the expression of SHP2 increased significantly during decidualization induction, and the same data were obtained in tissue samples, indicating that SHP2 may play an important role in regulating the biological behavior of decidualization.

SHP2 is a nonreceptor protein tyrosine phosphatase encoded by the protein tyrosine phosphatase nonreceptor type 11 gene (PTPN11) (Kong & Long 2022). SHP2 is widely expressed and plays a key role in cell growth, survival, proliferation, differentiation, and migration (Idrees et al. 2020). In most cases, SHP2 is necessary for the Ras–ERK and PI3K–Akt pathways and plays a dynamic role in gametogenesis, embryo maturation, and embryonic development (Idrees et al. 2020). SHP2 upregulation enhances Ras-ERK signaling, thereby inhibiting LIF receptors and thus downregulating JAK–STAT3 signaling, ultimately promoting cell differentiation and specialization (Cha & Park 2010). In addition, SHP2 plays an important role in several types of stem cell proliferation by simultaneously activating Ras–ERK and JAK–STAT signaling (Shen et al. 2020). SHP2 regulates adhesion proteins through focal adhesion kinase (FAK) to maintain cell–cell interactions/adhesion, especially in the blood testicular gap junction (Puri & Walker 2013). In addition, the tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 increases cell movement through SFKs (Hartman et al. 2013). In addition to playing an important role in embryonic development, SHP2 is also crucial for early embryo implantation (Gu et al. 2021). The expression of SHP2 is essential for the proliferation and differentiation of trophoblast stem cells, which are special placental cells that are able to invade maternal tissue (Forbes et al. 2009). A recent study found that uterine-specific SHP2 deletion reduced ER-a transcription and inhibited the expression of uterine-specific PR, which is essential for embryo implantation (Ran et al. 2017). Knockout of SHP2 from the embryo or the mother’s uterus completely inhibited implantation (Yang et al. 2006). Another study showed that SHP2 plays a key role in matrix decidualization by mediating a variety of signaling pathways in uterine stromal cells (Cheng et al. 2022). RMC-4550 is a better potent and selective allosteric inhibitor of SHP2, which was highly selective for full-length SHP2 over other phosphatase, kinase, and safety pharmacology targets (Nichols et al. 2018, Bracht et al. 2019, Wang et al. 2020). Here, we found that SHP2 blockade can affect the process of decidualization by not only affecting the expression of decidualization marker factors but also the morphological reprogramming of decidualized cells. The biological behavior of decidualization in pregnant mice treated with the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 was also significantly inhibited, and the expression of progesterone downstream target genes was significantly reduced. These results suggest that SHP2 plays an important role in maintaining pregnancy by regulating the process of decidualization.

PR signaling plays a key role in the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy (Cope & Monsivais 2022). Complete ablation of progesterone signaling in vivo will lead to pregnancy failure (Conneely et al. 2001). PR signaling mainly involves PR and progesterone (Nothnick 2022). PR is a member of the nuclear receptor family. In the absence of progesterone ligand, PR is located in the cytoplasm as an inactive protein complex with inhibitory heat shock protein (HSP) 90 and HSP70, immunoglobulin and other factors (Jee et al. 2021). After ligand binding, PR is phosphorylated, inhibits protein dissociation and receptor dimerization, translocates to the nucleus, and combines with target genes at the specific palindromic progesterone response element on active chromatin that is ready for transcription. At the same time, to increase the complexity of the progesterone signal, the activity of PR can also be regulated by posttranslational modification, such as the phosphorylation of serine residues (mainly Ser294) in the N-terminal region of PR (Abdel-Hafiz & Horwitz 2014, Dwyer et al. 2020). This modification also plays an important role in regulating progesterone function in endometrial cells because it can stabilize the receptor and change its transcriptional activity, which can be induced when ligands are added (Cope & Monsivais 2022). Compared with the HC group, the phosphorylation of the Ser294 residue of PR was significantly reduced in ESCs of RM patients (Hosseinirad et al. 2021). Among them, the MAPK signaling pathway plays an important regulatory role in the phosphorylation of PR, while SHP2 is necessary for the molecular processes of Ras–ERK (Eaton et al. 2013). Activation of SHP2 is a crucial event for the induction of the ERK cascade (Pao et al. 2007, Rocha-Resende et al. 2017, Fedele et al. 2018, Anderson & Mazzoccoli 2019). SHP2 regulates the cellular morphological changes that occur through the ERK activation pathway and the small GTPases RhoA and Rac1 (Nakaoka et al. 2010). In this study, we found that the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 could inhibit the nuclear translocation of PR and the expression level of PR downstream target genes, and the use of the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 could inhibit the expression level of PR downstream target genes in decidual tissue of pregnant mice. In this study, we evaluated the effect of RMC-4550 on decidualization in mice by intraperitoneal injection, but it has some limitations, the most important of which is that intraperitoneal injection may cause systemic effects, followed by the possibility of wrong injection thus leading to complications such as perforation and bleeding of abdominal organs. There are also studies that have used uterine horn injections to perform experiments, but there are limitations to this approach. First, uterine horn injections require exposure to a larger surgical wound, which is more prone to infection; secondly, the drugs we use need to be dissolved using corn oil, and injecting corn oil in the uterine horn can induce spontaneous decidualization in the mouse uterus, which affects the experiment. Thus, additional studies are required to elucidate the effect of SHP2 inhibitors on endometrial decidualization in mice.

We further found that the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 could inhibit the nuclear translocation of PR by inhibiting the phosphorylation of ERK. These results suggest that SHP2 participates in decidualization by regulating the ERK signaling pathway to maintain the normal nuclear localization of PR. These findings provide effective evidence for the future production of drugs that can either enhance or inhibit PR function; drugs that can enhance PR function would include drugs that can promote its entry into the nucleus to potentially treat RM and that may have clinical application in other progesterone-related conditions, such as endometriosis, while the development of drugs that can inhibit the function of PR may be useful in breast cancer and endometrial cancer. However, whether SHP2 regulates PR function directly or indirectly through other signaling pathways requires further experiments.

RM is a common and difficult reproductive disorder (Ewington et al. 2019). However, less than 50% of RM couples are diagnosed with a definite cause (Toth et al. 2010). Our experimental results demonstrated SHP2 was upregulated in decidualization and the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 and shRNA-mediated SHP2 reduction attenuated decidualization in vitro and in vivo. Since RM is frequently associated with poor decidualization, we also examined its expression in RM decidua and found that SHP2 expression is blocked in RM, while the reason why SHP2 is suppressed in RM needs further exploration, as it is possibly related to factors such as hormone levels in vivo or the genetic background of the patients. There are currently no clear markers of miscarriage, and SHP2 downregulation holds promise as one of the markers of RM in the future. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have elucidated the significant characteristics of SHP2 in the signaling pathway of crucial events during tumorigenesis. Furthermore, SHP2 has important functions in multiple cell types involved in the tumor microenvironment (Song et al. 2021). More importantly, it was reported that SHP2 contributes to the pathomechanism of endometriosis (Huang et al. 2020). Since the pathophysiology of RM shows similar characteristics with endometriosis processes and endometriosis is associated with early pregnancy losses and possibly RM. In the cases of endometriosis, other factors associated with the disease also are susceptible to causing miscarriages and possibly RM (Pirtea et al. 2021). The increased expression of SHP2 might imply similar functions in RM. Although SHP2 has not been reported in RM, the SHP2 regulated RAS/ERK MAPK cascade, PI3K, and JAK/STAT signaling, which have been notably confirmed in abnormal signaling of RM and these signaling pathways are being regarded as therapeutic potential targets (Yotova et al. 2011, McKinnon et al. 2016). Therefore, we consider SHP2 to be ‘promising’ potential biomarker of RM. Moreover, our work also suggests a potential SHP2-based therapeutic strategy for RM, and more studies are needed in the future to evaluate other functions that are disrupted by SHP2 dysfunction.

Overall, our experimental results suggested upregulation of SHP2 is part of the decidualization program and that upregulated SHP2 is involved in decidualization by maintaining the normal nuclear localization of PR through the ERK signaling pathway (Fig. 7). This pathway serves as a bridge linking impaired decidualization resulting from SHP2 downregulation and the occurrence of miscarriage, providing a new scientific and clinical understanding of the occurrence of unexplained miscarriage.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Illustrative model of uterine SHP2 maintaining PR function during decidualization. In the absence of progesterone ligands, PR and chaperone complexes form inhibitory proteins, including heat shock protein 90 (hsp90), p23 and cochaperones containing tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs). The binding of progesterone activates PR by inducing conformational changes, phosphorylation, nuclear translocation, and recruitment of a series of coactivators (CoA) to regulate target gene transcription. SHP2 participates in decidualization by activating Ras–ERK to maintain the normal nuclear localization of PR and the expression of downstream target genes. CoR, coregulator; P4, progesterone; PR, progesterone receptor; SHP2, Src homology-2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-2; TF, transcription factor.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Grant No. 82000150 and 82202579), Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (JCYJ20190814164601648, JCYJ20210324123003009, JCYJ20220530144814032 and JCYJ20210324123210028), Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research (No. 2021B1212040006), Guangzhou industry university research collaborative innovation major project (No. 2016201604030009).

Author contribution statement

Lin Chen and Weijie Zhao designed the research, performed the experiments and wrote the paper. Mengxiong Li assisted with the collection of human samples and assisted with the experiments. Yazhu Yang, Chengzi Tian, Dengyang Zhang, Zhiguang Chang and Yunzhe Zhang assisted with the experiments. Zhizhuang Joe Zhao, Yun Chen and Lin Ma assisted with the data analysis. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

References

  1. Abdel-Hafiz HA & Horwitz KB. 2014Post-translational modifications of the progesterone receptors. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 14080–89. ( 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.12.008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson G & Mazzoccoli G. 2019Left ventricular hypertrophy: roles of mitochondria CYP1B1 and melatonergic pathways in Co-ordinating wider pathophysiology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20. ( 10.3390/ijms20164068) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bracht JWP, Karachaliou N, Bivona T, Lanman RB, Faull I, Nagy RJ, Drozdowskyj A, Berenguer J, Fernandez-Bruno M, Molina-Vila MAet al. 2019BRAF mutations Classes I, II, and III in NSCLC patients included in the SLLIP trial: the need for a new pre-clinical treatment rationale. Cancers (Basel) 11. ( 10.3390/cancers11091381) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GLet al. 2009The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clinical Chemistry 55611–622. ( 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cha Y & Park KS. 2010SHP2 is a downstream target of ZAP70 to regulate JAK1/STAT3 and ERK signaling pathways in mouse embryonic stem cells. FEBS Letters 5844241–4246. ( 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.09.016) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng J, Liang J, Li Y, Gao X, Ji M, Liu M, Tian Y, Feng G, Deng W, Wang Het al. 2022Shp2 in uterine stromal cells critically regulates on time embryo implantation and stromal decidualization by multiple pathways during early pregnancy. PLOS Genetics 18 e1010018. ( 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010018) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Conneely OM Mulac-Jericevic B Lydon JP & De Mayo FJ. 2001Reproductive functions of the progesterone receptor isoforms: lessons from knock-out mice. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 17997–103. ( 10.1016/s0303-7207(0100465-8) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cope DI & Monsivais D. 2022Progesterone receptor signaling in the uterus is essential for pregnancy success. Cells 11. ( 10.3390/cells11091474) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dwyer AR Truong TH Ostrander JH & Lange CA. 202090 years of progesterone: steroid receptors as MAPK signaling sensors in breast cancer: let the fates decide. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 65 T35–T48. ( 10.1530/JME-19-0274) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eaton JL Unno K Caraveo M Lu Z & Kim JJ. 2013Increased AKT or MEK1/2 activity influences progesterone receptor levels and localization in endometriosis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 98E1871–E1879. ( 10.1210/jc.2013-1661) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ewington LJ Tewary S & Brosens JJ. 2019New insights into the mechanisms underlying recurrent pregnancy loss. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 45258–265. ( 10.1111/jog.13837) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fedele C, Ran H, Diskin B, Wei W, Jen J, Geer MJ, Araki K, Ozerdem U, Simeone DM, Miller Get al. 2018SHP2 inhibition prevents adaptive resistance to MEK inhibitors in multiple cancer models. Cancer Discovery 81237–1249. ( 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0444) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Feng GS.2007Shp2-mediated molecular signaling in control of embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Research 1737–41. ( 10.1038/sj.cr.7310140) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Forbes K West G Garside R Aplin JD & Westwood M. 2009The protein-tyrosine phosphatase, SRC homology-2 domain containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-2, is a crucial mediator of exogenous insulin-like growth factor signaling to human trophoblast. Endocrinology 1504744–4754. ( 10.1210/en.2009-0166) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gellersen B Brosens IA & Brosens JJ. 2007Decidualization of the human endometrium: mechanisms, functions, and clinical perspectives. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 25445–453. ( 10.1055/s-2007-991042) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gu SH Chen CH & Lin PL. 2021Expression of protein tyrosine phosphatases and Bombyx embryonic development. Journal of Insect Physiology 130 104198. ( 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2021.104198) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gynecologists 1995ACoOa 2002 ACOG practice bulletin. Management of recurrent pregnancy loss. Number 24, February 2001. (Replaces Technical Bulletin Number 212, September 1995). International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 78179–190. ( 10.1016/s0020-7292(0200197-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hartman ZR Schaller MD & Agazie YM. 2013The tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 regulates focal adhesion kinase to promote EGF-induced lamellipodia persistence and cell migration. Molecular Cancer Research 11651–664. ( 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0578) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hosseinirad H Novin MG Hosseini S Nazarian H Safaei Z Hashemi T Paktinat S & Mofarahe ZS. 2021Evaluation of expression and phosphorylation of progesterone receptor in endometrial stromal cells of patients with recurrent implantation failure compared to healthy fertile women. Reproductive Sciences 281457–1465. ( 10.1007/s43032-020-00428-8) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang Y, Zhang T, Chen L, Yu M, Liu Q, Zhou C, Tang Q, Zhou L, Zhan H, Li Jet al. 2020Elevated expressions of SHP2 and GAB2 correlated with VEGF in eutopic and ectopic endometrium of women with ovarian endometriosis. Gynecological Endocrinology 36813–818. ( 10.1080/09513590.2020.1787378) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Idrees M Oh SH Muhammad T El-Sheikh M Song SH Lee KL & Kong IK. 2020Growth factors, and cytokines; understanding the role of tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 in gametogenesis and early embryo development. Cells 9. ( 10.3390/cells9081798) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jee B Dhar R Singh S & Karmakar S. 2021Heat shock proteins and their role in pregnancy: redefining the function of "old rum in a new bottle". Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 9 648463. ( 10.3389/fcell.2021.648463) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kano H, Ichihara E, Watanabe H, Nishii K, Ando C, Nakasuka T, Ninomiya K, Kato Y, Kubo T, Rai Ket al. 2021SHP2 inhibition enhances the effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in preclinical models of treatment-naive ALK-, ROS1-, or EGFR-altered non-small cell lung cancer. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 201653–1662. ( 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0965) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kong J & Long YQ. 2022Recent advances in the discovery of protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 inhibitors. RSC Medicinal Chemistry 13246–257. ( 10.1039/d1md00386k) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Larsen EC Christiansen OB Kolte AM & Macklon N. 2013New insights into mechanisms behind miscarriage. BMC Medicine 11 154. ( 10.1186/1741-7015-11-154) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li Q Kannan A Wang W Demayo FJ Taylor RN Bagchi MK & Bagchi IC. 2007Bone morphogenetic protein 2 functions via a conserved signaling pathway involving Wnt4 to regulate uterine decidualization in the mouse and the human. Journal of Biological Chemistry 28231725–31732. ( 10.1074/jbc.M704723200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu H, Zhu R, Liu C, Ma R, Wang L, Chen B, Li L, Niu J, Zhao D, Mo Fet al. 2017Evaluation of decalcification techniques for rat femurs using HE and immunohistochemical staining. BioMed Research International 2017 9050754. ( 10.1155/2017/9050754) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu C Li S Noer PR Kjaer-Sorensen K Juhl AK Goldstein A Ke C Oxvig C & Duan C. 2020The metalloproteinase Papp-aa controls epithelial cell quiescence-proliferation transition. eLife 9. ( 10.7554/eLife.52322) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu M Gao S Elhassan RM Hou X & Fang H. 2021Strategies to overcome drug resistance using SHP2 inhibitors. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B 113908–3924. ( 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.03.037) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lu H Liu C Huynh H Le TBU LaMarche MJ Mohseni M Engelman JA Hammerman PS Caponigro G & Hao HX. 2020Resistance to allosteric SHP2 inhibition in FGFR-driven cancers through rapid feedback activation of FGFR. Oncotarget 11265–281. ( 10.18632/oncotarget.27435) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lv S Wang N Ma J Li WP Chen ZJ & Zhang C. 2019Impaired decidualization caused by downregulation of circadian clock gene BMAL1 contributes to human recurrent miscarriage†. Biology of Reproduction 101138–147. ( 10.1093/biolre/ioz063) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ma X, Zhang L, Song J, Nguyen E, Lee RS, Rodgers SJ, Li F, Huang C, Schittenhelm RB, Chan Het al. 2019Characterization of the Src-regulated kinome identifies SGK1 as a key mediator of Src-induced transformation. Nature Communications 10 296. ( 10.1038/s41467-018-08154-1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McAvoy T & Nairn AC. 2010Serine/threonine protein phosphatase assays. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology Unit18.18. ( 10.1002/0471142727.mb1818s92) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. McKinnon BD Kocbek V Nirgianakis K Bersinger NA & Mueller MD. 2016Kinase signalling pathways in endometriosis: potential targets for non-hormonal therapeutics. Human Reproduction Update 22382–403. ( 10.1093/humupd/dmv060) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nakaoka Y, Shioyama W, Kunimoto S, Arita Y, Higuchi K, Yamamoto K, Fujio Y, Nishida K, Kuroda T, Hirota Het al. 2010SHP2 mediates gp130-dependent cardiomyocyte hypertrophy via negative regulation of skeletal alpha-actin gene. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 49157–164. ( 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.03.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ng SW Norwitz GA Pavlicev M Tilburgs T Simón C & Norwitz ER. 2020Endometrial decidualization: the primary driver of pregnancy health. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21 4092. ( 10.3390/ijms21114092) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nichols RJ, Haderk F, Stahlhut C, Schulze CJ, Hemmati G, Wildes D, Tzitzilonis C, Mordec K, Marquez A, Romero Jet al. 2018RAS nucleotide cycling underlies the SHP2 phosphatase dependence of mutant BRAF-, NF1- and RAS-driven cancers. Nature Cell Biology 201064–1073. ( 10.1038/s41556-018-0169-1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nothnick WB.2022MicroRNAs and progesterone receptor signaling in endometriosis pathophysiology. Cells 11. ( 10.3390/cells11071096) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ochoa-Bernal MA & Fazleabas AT. 2020Physiologic events of embryo implantation and decidualization in human and non-human Primates. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21. ( 10.3390/ijms21061973) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pao LI Badour K Siminovitch KA & Neel BG. 2007Nonreceptor protein-tyrosine phosphatases in immune cell signaling. Annual Review of Immunology 25473–523. ( 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115647) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pirtea P Cicinelli E De Nola R de Ziegler D & Ayoubi JM. 2021Endometrial causes of recurrent pregnancy losses: endometriosis, adenomyosis, and chronic endometritis. Fertility and Sterility 115546–560. ( 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.12.010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Puri P & Walker WH. 2013The tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 regulates Sertoli cell junction complexes. Biology of Reproduction 88 59. ( 10.1095/biolreprod.112.104414) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Quenby S, Gallos ID, Dhillon-Smith RK, Podesek M, Stephenson MD, Fisher J, Brosens JJ, Brewin J, Ramhorst R, Lucas ESet al. 2021Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet 3971658–1667. ( 10.1016/S0140-6736(2100682-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Quintana E, Schulze CJ, Myers DR, Choy TJ, Mordec K, Wildes D, Shifrin NT, Belwafa A, Koltun ES, Gill ALet al. 2020Allosteric inhibition of SHP2 stimulates antitumor immunity by transforming the immunosuppressive environment. Cancer Research 802889–2902. ( 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-3038) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rai R & Regan L. 2006Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet 368601–611. ( 10.1016/S0140-6736(0669204-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ran H, Kong S, Zhang S, Cheng J, Zhou C, He B, Xin Q, Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Feng GSet al. 2017Nuclear Shp2 directs normal embryo implantation via facilitating the ERα tyrosine phosphorylation by the Src kinase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1144816–4821. ( 10.1073/pnas.1700978114) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ranall MV Gabrielli BG & Gonda TJ. 2010Adaptation and validation of DNA synthesis detection by fluorescent dye derivatization for high-throughput screening. BioTechniques 48379–386. ( 10.2144/000113410) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rocha-Resende C Guedes de Jesus IC Roman-Campos D Miranda AS Alves F Resende RR Dos Santos Cruz J Machado FS & Guatimosim S. 2017Absence of suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 turns cardiomyocytes unresponsive to LIF-dependent increases in Ca(2+) levels. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology 312C478–C486. ( 10.1152/ajpcell.00004.2016) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sandra O Mansouri-Attia N & Lea RG. 2011Novel aspects of endometrial function: a biological sensor of embryo quality and driver of pregnancy success. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 2468–79. ( 10.1071/RD11908) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shen D Chen W Zhu J Wu G Shen R Xi M & Sun H. 2020Therapeutic potential of targeting SHP2 in human developmental disorders and cancers. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 190 112117. ( 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112117) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Song Z Wang M Ge Y Chen XP Xu Z Sun Y & Xiong XF. 2021Tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 inhibitors in tumor-targeted therapies. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B 1113–29. ( 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.07.010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Stewart SA, Dykxhoorn DM, Palliser D, Mizuno H, Yu EY, An DS, Sabatini DM, Chen IS, Hahn WC, Sharp PAet al. 2003Lentivirus-delivered stable gene silencing by RNAi in primary cells. RNA 9493–501. ( 10.1261/rna.2192803) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tang X Li G Shi L Su F Qian M Liu Z Meng Y Sun S Li J & Liu B. 2021Combined intermittent fasting and ERK inhibition enhance the anti-tumor effects of chemotherapy via the GSK3beta-SIRT7 axis. Nature Communications 12 5058. ( 10.1038/s41467-021-25274-3) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Teklenburg G Salker M Heijnen C Macklon NS & Brosens JJ. 2010The molecular basis of recurrent pregnancy loss: impaired natural embryo selection. Molecular Human Reproduction 16886–895. ( 10.1093/molehr/gaq079) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Timmerman I Hoogenboezem M Bennett AM Geerts D Hordijk PL & van Buul JD. 2012The tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 regulates recovery of endothelial adherens junctions through control of β-catenin phosphorylation. Molecular Biology of the Cell 234212–4225. ( 10.1091/mbc.E12-01-0038) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Toth B Jeschke U Rogenhofer N Scholz C Würfel W Thaler CJ & Makrigiannakis A. 2010Recurrent miscarriage: current concepts in diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Reproductive Immunology 8525–32. ( 10.1016/j.jri.2009.12.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tzouvelekis A, Yu G, Lino Cardenas CL, Herazo-Maya JD, Wang R, Woolard T, Zhang Y, Sakamoto K, Lee H, Yi JSet al. 2017SH2 domain-containing Phosphatase-2 is a novel antifibrotic regulator in pulmonary fibrosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 195500–514. ( 10.1164/rccm.201602-0329OC) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Uhlen M, Bjorling E, Agaton C, Szigyarto CA, Amini B, Andersen E, Andersson AC, Angelidou P, Asplund A, Asplund Cet al. 2005A human protein atlas for normal and cancer tissues based on antibody proteomics. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 41920–1932. ( 10.1074/mcp.M500279-MCP200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Uhlen M, Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A, Sivertsson Å, Kampf C, Sjostedt E, Asplund Aet al. 2015Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347 1260419. ( 10.1126/science.1260419) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang X Zhao Y & Zhong X. 2014Protective effects of baicalin on decidua cells of LPS-induced mice abortion. Journal of Immunology Research 2014 859812. ( 10.1155/2014/859812) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang RR Liu WS Zhou L Ma Y & Wang RL. 2020Probing the acting mode and advantages of RMC-4550 as an Src-homology 2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase (SHP2) inhibitor at molecular level through molecular docking and molecular dynamics. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 381525–1538. ( 10.1080/07391102.2019.1613266) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Weimar CH Kavelaars A Brosens JJ Gellersen B de Vreeden-Elbertse JM Heijnen CJ & Macklon NS. 2012Endometrial stromal cells of women with recurrent miscarriage fail to discriminate between high- and low-quality human embryos. PLOS ONE 7 e41424. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0041424) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wolfson ML Correa F Leishman E Vercelli C Cymeryng C Blanco J Bradshaw HB & Franchi AM. 2015Lipopolysaccharide-induced murine embryonic resorption involves changes in endocannabinoid profiling and alters progesterone secretion and inflammatory response by a CB1-mediated fashion. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 411214–222. ( 10.1016/j.mce.2015.04.032) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Yang W Klaman LD Chen B Araki T Harada H Thomas SM George EL & Neel BG. 2006An Shp2/SFK/Ras/Erk signaling pathway controls trophoblast stem cell survival. Developmental Cell 10317–327. ( 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.01.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Yotova IY Quan P Leditznig N Beer U Wenzl R & Tschugguel W. 2011Abnormal activation of Ras/Raf/MAPK and RhoA/ROCKII signalling pathways in eutopic endometrial stromal cells of patients with endometriosis. Human Reproduction 26885–897. ( 10.1093/humrep/der010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Yu CF Liu ZX & Cantley LG. 2002ERK negatively regulates the epidermal growth factor-mediated interaction of Gab1 and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 27719382–19388. ( 10.1074/jbc.M200732200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Yuan X Bu H Zhou J Yang CY & Zhang H. 2020Recent advances of SHP2 inhibitors in cancer therapy: current development and clinical application. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 6311368–11396. ( 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00249) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhang C, Liu J, Liang Y, Wu R, Zhao Y, Hong X, Lin M, Yu H, Liu L, Levine AJet al. 2013aTumour-associated mutant p53 drives the Warburg effect. Nature Communications 4 2935. ( 10.1038/ncomms3935) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhang S Lin H Kong S Wang S Wang H Wang H & Armant DR. 2013bPhysiological and molecular determinants of embryo implantation. Molecular Aspects of Medicine 34939–980. ( 10.1016/j.mam.2012.12.011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhang Y Yang J Lv S Zhao DQ Chen ZJ Li WP & Zhang C. 2018Downregulation of decidual SP1 and P300 is associated with severe preeclampsia. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 60133–143. ( 10.1530/JME-17-0180) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang T Shen HH Qin XY & Li MQ. 2022aThe metabolic characteristic of decidual immune cells and their unique properties in pregnancy loss. Immunological Reviews 308168–186. ( 10.1111/imr.13085) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhang Y Lu W Zhao Q Chen J Wang T & Ji J. 2022bThe role of the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 in ossification. Developmental Dynamics 251748–758. ( 10.1002/dvdy.449) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhou P Xiao M Li W Sun X Bai Y Meng F Zhu Z Yuan W & Sun K. 2022SHP2 inhibitors show anti-myeloma activity and synergize with bortezomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Frontiers in Pharmacology 13 841308. ( 10.3389/fphar.2022.841308) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhou S Xia H Xu H Tang Q Nie Y Gong QY & Bi F. 2018ERRalpha suppression enhances the cytotoxicity of the MEK inhibitor trametinib against colon cancer cells. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research 37 218. ( 10.1186/s13046-018-0862-8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Reproduction (Cambridge, England) are provided here courtesy of Bioscientifica Ltd.

RESOURCES