Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Jun 29;18(6):e0287846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287846

Incidence and treatment trends of infectious spondylodiscitis in South Korea: A nationwide population-based study

Hee Jung Son 1, Myongwhan Kim 1, Dong Hong Kim 2, Chang-Nam Kang 2,*
Editor: Hiroshi Hashizume3
PMCID: PMC10309630  PMID: 37384614

Abstract

The incidence of infectious spondylodiscitis (IS) has increased in recent years due to an increase in the numbers of older patients with chronic diseases, as well as patients with immunocompromise, steroid use, drug abuse, invasive spinal procedures, and spinal surgeries. However, research focusing on IS in the general population is lacking. This study investigated the incidence and treatment trends of IS in South Korea using data obtained from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. A total of 169,244 patients (mean age: 58.0 years) diagnosed from 2010 to 2019 were included in the study. A total of 10,991 cases were reported in 2010 and 18,533 cases in 2019. Hence, there was a 1.5-fold increase in incidence rate per 100,000 people from 22.90 in 2010 to 35.79 in 2019 (P < 0.05). The incidence rate of pyogenic spondylodiscitis per 100,000 people increased from 15.35 in 2010 to 33.75 in 2019, and that of tuberculous spondylodiscitis decreased from 7.55 in 2010 to 2.04 in 2019 (P < 0.05, respectively). Elderly individuals ≥ 60 years of age accounted for 47.6% (80,578 patients) of all cases of IS. The proportion of patients who received conservative treatment increased from 82.4% in 2010 to 85.8% in 2019, while that of patients receiving surgical treatment decreased from 17.6% to 14.2% (P < 0.05, respectively). Among surgical treatments, the proportions of corpectomy and anterior fusion declined, while proportion of incision and drainage increased (P < 0.05, respectively). The total healthcare costs increased 2.9-fold from $29,821,391.65 in 2010 to $86,815,775.81 in 2019 with a significant increase in the ratio to gross domestic product. Hence, this population-based cohort study demonstrated that the incidence rate of IS has increased in South Korea. The conservative treatment has increased, while the surgical treatment has decreased. The socioeconomic burden of IS has increased rapidly.

Introduction

Infectious spondylodiscitis (IS) is an infection of the vertebral body, intervertebral discs, nervous tissue, and surrounding soft tissues. IS is a relatively rare disease, accounting for 3–5% of total osteomyelitis cases. The incidence rate of IS is 2.2–5.8 per 100,000 people per year. The incidence is higher in older adults, at 9.8 per 100,000 people ≥ 65 years of age [14]. However, 27–32% of patients diagnosed with IS develop serious complications such as muscle weakness or paralysis, impaired urinary or bowel symptoms, persistent back pain, and spinal deformity. In addition, IS can be a life-threatening disease, with reported mortality rates of 2–29% [57].

The most crucial factor in establishing a diagnosis of IS is a high clinical suspicion of infection based on symptoms such as back pain and fever. White blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate should be assessed in cases with a high clinical suspicion of IS. In addition, a blood culture should be performed to confirm bacteremia. These patients should also undergo magnetic resonance imaging using a contrast media, which is the most accurate test for diagnosing IS, as well as psoas and epidural abscesses [3, 810].

The conservative treatment for IS includes the administration of antibiotics or anti-tuberculosis drugs, as well as bed rest, and spinal stabilization with orthosis. Surgical treatment such as incision and drainage, decompression, corpectomy, and fusion can also be required in certain cases. Surgery is usually indicated for bacteriological or histological confirmation, presence of intractable pain, neurological paralysis, or spinal deformity. It can also be performed if there is lack of improvement in symptoms despite the administration of appropriate antibiotics or anti-tuberculosis drugs. However, IS is often difficult to diagnose early, with an average of 3 months required to reach the diagnosis. Its treatment also often requires an average of ≥ 12 months for completion of therapeutic regimen. This can pose significant difficulty in managing this disease appropriately. It is also associated with a significant burden, both individually and socioeconomically [3, 1113].

In recent years, the incidence of IS, especially pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS), has been increasing due to an increase in the numbers of older patients with chronic diseases, immunocompromised patients, as well as patients with a prior history of steroid use, drug abuse, invasive spinal procedures, and spinal surgeries. Early diagnosis due to the development of imaging tests has also increased the incidence of IS. However, the incidence of tuberculous spondylodiscitis (TS) has reportedly decreased with the decrease in the incidence of tuberculosis [79, 14, 15]. The awareness of increasing IS incidence can lead to its early detection. It would also help clinicians avoid missed diagnosis. However, research focusing on IS in the general population is lacking. Hence, this study investigated the incidence and treatment trends of IS in South Korean population using data obtained from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA).

Methods

Data source

This study used data recorded in the HIRA database from 2010 to 2019. The South Korean government has adopted a form of social insurance that provides medical benefits through the National Health Insurance (NHI). Cosmetic procedures, and medical care required after traffic or occupational accidents are excluded from coverage under this insurance. In total, 97% of the South Korean population is enrolled in the NHI, while the 3% with very low incomes are classified as eligible for the Medical Aid Program (MAP). HIRA manages all medical data of patients enrolled in the NHI and MAP. Therefore, the HIRA database contains a record of all medical care services provided to almost all the patients in Korea. Database information includes diagnoses based on the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), demographic data such as age and sex, prescribed medications, tests, procedures, and surgeries performed. These data are suitable for studies investigating the incidence rate or treatment trends of a particular disease in the entire population.

Study design and cohort

IS can be broadly classified into two types; pyogenic and granulomatous spondylodiscitis. The causes of PS are mostly bacterial, while granulomatous spondylodiscitis can be caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and certain other bacteria and fungi, etc. As most cases of granulomatous spondylodiscitis are caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the present study focused on PS and TS. These conditions were classified in the HIRA database by ICD-10 codes M462 (osteomyelitis of vertebra), M463 [infection of intervertebral disc (pyogenic)], M465 (other infective spondylopathies), M492 (enterobacterial spondylitis), M493 (spondylopathy in other infectious and parasitic diseases), M490 and A1800 (tuberculosis of the spine). In order to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis, IS cases were defined as patients assigned the above diagnosis codes who visited a medical institution three or more times with the same diagnosis codes assigned for these visits. This study included a total of 169,244 patients (mean age: 58.0 years) who were diagnosed in the last 10 years. Patients diagnosed with IS prior to this period were excluded.

Patients who underwent surgery for IS after the diagnostic code was recorded were classified as having received surgical treatment. The remaining patients were classified as having received conservative treatment, including antibiotics or anti-tuberculosis drugs. The surgical treatment methods were classified using the following codes: N1491-3, N1497-8, N2491, N2497-9 (decompression), N0451-3 (corpectomy), N2461-6, N0466, N1466 (anterior fusion), N2467-9, N0468-9, N1460, N1469, N2470 (posterior fusion). Patients who were not assigned the aforementioned surgical codes but were confirmed to have undergone surgery were considered to have received incision and drainage.

The demographic data and comorbidities of patients diagnosed with IS based on the ICD-10 code were also examined. The comorbidities were assessed using the following ICD-10 codes: E10-4 (diabetes mellitus, DM), N18-9 (end-stage renal disease, ESRD), M05-6, M08 (rheumatoid arthritis, RA), D86, D89, M30-6 (autoimmune disease except for RA), K74 (liver cirrhosis), J44 (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), B20, D80-5, D87-8 (immunodeficiency disease), I33, and I38-9 (infective endocarditis). The comorbidities were confirmed when there were three or more visits to a medical institution with the same diagnosis codes recorded at each visit, and when the prescription of drugs suitable for the disease was also reviewed.

Additionally, the proportion of IS patients with NHI and MAP enrollment were reviewed and the total amount claimed from HIRA was identified. The claimed amounts were identified in Korean won and converted to US dollars using the average exchange rate (1$ = 1,166₩) in 2019 (http//ecos.bok.or.kr). The ratio of total healthcare costs to gross domestic product (GDP) were subsequently calculated to determine the socioeconomic burden.

Ethical statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 2023-01-025). Due to the retrospective nature of this study, and use of data stored in the HIRA’s database, the requirement for patient consent was waived. And all data obtained from HIRA’s database were fully anonymized.

Statistical analysis

The Cochran-Armitage trend test was performed to analyze the incidence of IS and the treatment trends over 10 years. The changes in the ratio of total healthcare costs to GDP were analyzed using chi-square tests with linear-by-linear association. The proportions of NHI enrollees and MAP subjects and the ratio of men and women patients were compared using chi-square tests. All statistics were performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The incidence rate of IS in South Korea during a 10-year-period from 2010 to 2019 was 33.4 per 100,000 people. A total of 10,991 cases were reported in 2010 and 18,533 cases in 2019. There was a 1.5-fold increase in the IS incidence rate per 100,000 people, from 22.90 in 2010 to 35.79 in 2019 (P < 0.05). The PS incidence rate per 100,000 people increased from 15.35 in 2010 (7,368 patients) to 33.75 in 2019 (17,477 patients), while the TS incidence rate per 100,000 people decreased from 7.55 (3,623 patients) in 2010 to 2.04 (1,056 patients) in 2019 (P < 0.05, respectively) (Table 1 and Fig 1). The highest number of patients were in their 50s (37,132 patients). The elderly population ≥ 60 years of age accounted for 47.6% (80,578 patients) of the total cases of IS (Table 2). The incidence in both men and women increased from 2010 to 2019, with a higher incidence observed in women than in men (P < 0.05, respectively) (Fig 2).

Table 1. The number of IS cases and its incidence rate per 100,000 people from 2010 to 2019.

Year No. of cases Incidence rate per 100,000 population
Total Pyogenic Tuberculosis Total Pyogenic Tuberculosis
2010 10,991 7,368 3,623 22.90 15.35 7.55
2011 13,211 11,560 1,651 26.04 22.79 3.25
2012 15,793 14,054 1,739 31.00 27.58 3.41
2013 16,505 14,951 1,554 32.27 29.23 3.04
2014 19,018 17,627 1,391 37.05 34.34 2.71
2015 17,959 16,576 1,383 35.17 32.46 2.71
2016 19,284 18,013 1,271 37.61 35.13 2.48
2017 19,532 18,321 1,211 37.98 35.63 2.36
2018 18,418 17,386 1,032 35.67 33.67 2.00
2019 18,533 17,477 1,056 35.79 33.75 2.04
Total 169,244 153,333 15,911
P-value < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Fig 1. The number of PS and TS cases from 2010 to 2019.

Fig 1

Table 2. The number of IS cases stratified according to 10-year age groups.

Age (years) No. of cases [mean age: 58.0 (1–105)]
Total Men Women
≤ 10 283 155 128
11∼20 2,981 1,701 1,280
21∼30 8,033 4,540 3,493
31∼40 15,474 8,575 6,899
41∼50 24,763 12,059 12,704
51∼60 37,132 16,245 20,887
61∼70 36,224 15,297 20,927
71∼80 33,972 12,385 21,587
81∼90 9,877 3,294 6,583
≥ 91 505 164 341

Fig 2. The number of cases and sex distribution of IS from 2010 to 2019.

Fig 2

The proportion of patients who received conservative treatment increased from 82.4% in 2010 to 85.8% in 2019. In contrast, the number of patients who underwent surgical treatment decreased from 17.6% to 14.2% (P < 0.05, respectively). Among the different surgical treatments, the proportions of corpectomy and anterior fusion declined, while proportion of incision and drainage increased (P < 0.05, respectively) (Table 3). Patients with IS experienced multiple comorbidities, including DM (93,199 patients, 55.1%), RA (46,146 patients, 27.3%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (25,742 patients, 15.2%), and ESRD (21,682 patients, 12.8%). Infective endocarditis was identified in 1,133 patients (0.7%), which was mainly associated with PS; therefore, the ratio was calculated based on PS cases (153,333 patients in total) (Table 4).

Table 3. The number of patients who underwent surgical treatment for IS, stratified according to different surgical methods.

Year Decompression Corpectomy Anterior fusion Posterior fusion Incision and drainage Total
2010 169 57 104 145 1,462 1,937
2011 190 59 113 148 1,492 2,002
2012 193 58 118 148 1,623 2,140
2013 151 39 93 128 1,650 2,061
2014 199 43 107 144 1,793 2,286
2015 184 54 109 168 1,757 2,272
2016 243 62 121 201 1,868 2,495
2017 246 36 127 197 2,114 2,720
2018 233 25 101 154 2,153 2,666
2019 252 26 132 184 2,041 2,635
Total 2,060 442 1,125 1,617 17,970 23,214
P-value 0.3473 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.4370 < 0.05

Table 4. The prevalence of comorbidities in IS patients (Total: 169,244 patients).

No. of cases
DM 93,199 (55.1%)
ESRD 21,682 (12.8%)
RA 46,146 (27.3%)
Autoimmune disease except RA 3,890 (2.3%)
Liver cirrhosis 6,037 (3.6%)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 25,742 (15.2%)
Immunodeficiency disease 200 (0.1%)
Infective endocarditis* 1,133 (0.7%)

*It was calculated with a total of 153,333 PS patients as the denominator.

A significantly higher number of IS cases occurred in patients enrolled in MAP as compared with NHI enrollees (P < 0.05) (Table 5). The total healthcare costs increased 2.9-fold from 34,771,742,660 Korean Won ($29,821,391.65) in 2010 to 101,227,194,590 Korean Won ($86,815,775.81) in 2019. The socioeconomic burden of the disease also demonstrated rapid growth due to a significant increase in the ratio to GDP (P < 0.05). The medical costs did not differ significantly between patients who received conservative and surgical treatments (Fig 3).

Table 5. Proportion of health insurance type in patients treated for IS.

Year No. of cases
NHI MAP P -value
2010 10,082 / 48,906,795 (2.1%) 909 / 1,674,396 (5.4%) < 0.05
2011 11,932 / 49,299,165 (2.4%) 1,279 / 1,609,481 (7.9%) < 0.05
2012 14,646 / 49,662,097 (2.9%) 1,147 / 1,507,044 (7.6%) < 0.05
2013 15,428 / 49,989,620 (3.1%) 1,077 / 1,458,871 (7.4%) < 0.05
2014 17,830 / 50,316,384 (3.5%) 1,188 / 1,440,762 (8.2%) < 0.05
2015 16,844 / 50,490,157 (3.3%) 1,115 / 1,544,267 (7.2%) < 0.05
2016 17,994 / 50,763,293 (3.5%) 1,290 / 1,509,472 (8.5%) < 0.05
2017 18,280 / 50,940,885 (3.6%) 1,252 / 1,485,740 (8.4%) < 0.05
2018 17,147 / 51,071,982 (3.4%) 1,271 / 1,484,671 (8.6%) < 0.05
2019 17,196 / 51,391,447 (3.3%) 1,337 / 1,488,846 (9.0%) < 0.05

Fig 3. The total healthcare costs for IS.

Fig 3

Discussion

The findings of this study demonstrate that the incidence rate of IS per 100,000 people in South Korea has increased 1.5-fold over the past 10 years; the incidence rate of PS has increased while that of TS has decreased. The proportion of patients receiving conservative treatments increased during this period, while that of patients who underwent corpectomy and anterior fusion decreased. The socioeconomic burden of IS has increased rapidly.

Since IS is a relatively rare disease, published reports of its incidence are lacking. Grammatico et al. [16] reported that 1,422 and 1,425 patients with IS were identified in national hospitals in France in the years 2002 and 2003, respectively, with an incidence rate of 2.4 per 100,000 people and 6.5 per 100,000 in people ≥ 70 years of age. Kehrer et al. [1] conducted a study in the Danish Funen County that included 483,123 individuals. They reported that the incidence of IS increased from 2.2 in 1995 to 5.8 in 2008. Noh et al. [14] also investigated the incidence rate of IS using data obtained from the HIRA. They reported that the rate of IS increased from 23.3 per 100,000 people in 2005 to 58.4 per 100,000 in 2015. Using a similar study design, Kim et al. [17] reported an increase from 11.32 per 100,000 in 2007 to 13.35 per 100,000 in 2016 among people ≥ 20 years of age.

The incidence of IS has been increasing, mainly in older adults with multiple comorbidities and low immunity. This is due to the increase in the elderly population as well as increase in the number of patients with chronic diseases including DM, immunocompromised state, long-term steroid use, and drug abuse. This increase in IS incidence also reflects an increase in the early diagnosis of the disease due to the development of more advanced imaging modalities. The increase in invasive spinal procedures and surgeries has also contributed to the increasing incidence of IS, especially PS. A study analyzing data from HIRA reported that the number of patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis increased 2.54-fold, from 10,990 in 2003 to 27,942 in 2008. The number of patients undergoing outpatient epidural blocks also doubled from 40.8 per 1,000 in 2007 to 84.4 in 2015 [18, 19]. Kim et al. [7] reported that 55% of patients diagnosed with IS had undergone at least one spinal procedure one month before the diagnosis.

Even considering these factors, the incidence rate per 100,000 people in this study increased from 22.90 in 2010 to 35.79 in 2019, which is significantly higher than the rate reported previously. While previous studies have excluded the incidence of IS cases after spinal procedures and surgeries, the present study did not exclude them entirely. Hence, all cases of IS were included in the present study. In addition, previous studies were conducted in the early and mid-2000s when the elderly population was relatively small and spinal procedures and surgeries were not very frequent [1, 4, 16].

IS can occur at any age. However, it has a bimodal distribution as it is more frequently diagnosed either in individuals under 20 or individuals 50–70 years of age [2]. In this study, individuals ≤ 20 years of age accounted for only 1.9% (3,264 patients) of the total number of patients, while individuals aged 50–70 years and elderly individuals ≥ 60 years of age accounted for 43.3% (73,356 patients) and 47.6% (80,578 patients) of the total number of patients, respectively. The immune system deteriorates with age. And comorbidities such as DM make the elderly population particularly vulnerable to infection. This contributes to the high incidence of IS in elderly patients [20]. In addition, degenerative spinal diseases that occur at older ages usually require invasive spinal procedures and surgeries. Thus, IS caused by procedures and surgeries is more commonly diagnosed in the elderly [18, 19, 21].

Previous studies have reported a 1.5–2-fold higher incidence rate of IS in men compared with women. The cause of this difference has not yet been precisely identified. However, this could be due to the comparatively higher number of comorbidities in men compared to women [1, 2, 7]. In the present study, significantly more women were diagnosed with IS compared with men. Similarly, Kim et al. [17] reported that women had a higher incidence rate of IS than men analyzing the entire population of South Korea. A study investigating the epidemiology of spinal diseases in South Korea from 2012 to 2016 reported that women had a 1.4-fold higher incidence of spinal diseases than men, which could have contributed to the high incidence of IS as these patients are more likely to undergo spinal procedures and surgeries [22]. Higher rates of osteoporosis in women than in men could also be associated with higher rates of IS. According to a recent study, osteoporosis is a novel risk factor of infections and sepsis. Interleukin 7 and lipocalin 2-related interactions between bone metabolism and the immune system could partially explain the association of osteoporosis with an increased risk of infections and sepsis [23]. However, more research is required to investigate these sex differences and their underlying causes.

Over the past decade, the incidence of PS has increased, while that of TS has decreased. TS is mainly caused by hematogenous spread from the lungs or other primary lesions. Some tuberculosis bacteria can also be directly transmitted to the spine from organs around the spine, such as the lungs, kidneys, and digestive organs, hence, causing infection. Considering this mechanism of occurrence, the decrease in the incidence of TS could be associated with a reduction in the overall prevalence of tuberculosis. The prevalence of tuberculosis per 100,000 people had halved from 940 in 1965 to 443 in 1985 and subsequently, by one-quarter to 101 in 2015 in South Korea. However, the rate of tuberculosis infection remains high in the elderly population; thus, its diagnosis should not be neglected in this subset of patients [24].

The use of conservative treatment for IS has increased, while the use of surgical methods such as corpectomy and anterior fusion have decreased. This is because the clinicians took an active diagnostic approach as the incidence rate of IS increased. The development of advanced imaging modalities has supported these efforts, leading to an increase in the early diagnosis of IS. Moreover, the development of effective antibiotics against resistant bacteria has led to sufficiently good results, even with conservative treatment alone [3, 10, 19, 25]. This could have reduced the number of cases of advanced IS requiring surgical treatments such as corpectomy and anterior fusion. This is consistent with the tendency to avoid highly invasive surgeries, as evidenced by the recent increasing trend in minimally invasive spine surgery [26, 27].

DM, advanced age, ESRD, RA, liver cirrhosis, cancer, and immunocompromised conditions are risk factors for IS. Uncontrolled DM is the most significant risk factor [2, 6, 28]. In this study, 55.1% of IS patients had DM, 27.3% had RA, and 12.8% had ESRD. However, this study did not examine whether these comorbidities were risk factors for IS.

In this study, 0.7% of patients had infective endocarditis, a rate lower than previous reports of 2–5% [1]. This could be due to the lack of routine echocardiography for patients diagnosed with IS, resulting in an underestimated incidence. Behmanesh et al. [29] reported incidence rates of infective endocarditis in patients undergoing and not undergoing routine transesophageal echocardiography of 33% and 3%, respectively, which is a significant difference. Infective endocarditis can cause serious complications such as cerebral infarction or aortic aneurysm. It is also associated with a very high mortality rate if not treated on time. Hence, routine echocardiography is recommended for patients diagnosed with IS.

Patients eligible for MAP developed more cases of IS compared with NHI enrollees; the total income differed between the two groups. Individuals with low incomes are more likely to have poor nutrition, making them more vulnerable to infectious diseases. In addition, such individuals also have limited access to medical institutions, which increases the time to diagnosis. Therefore, the index of suspicion for IS should be high in patients with low socioeconomic status complaining of back pain, fever, etc., and they should be tested accordingly [30, 31].

With the increase in the incidence of IS, the socioeconomic burden of managing this disease has also increased. The results of this study demonstrated that although the number of patients receiving surgical treatment was significantly lower than those receiving conservative treatments, the total healthcare costs between each group did not differ. This is because surgery usually requires higher medical expenses due to the addition of surgery costs, anesthesia fees, material costs, etc. If patients with suspected IS are diagnosed early by blood tests and imaging assessments, satisfactory results can be achieved via conservative treatment alone with antibiotics or anti-tuberculosis drugs. This would reduce the number of patients requiring surgical treatment, which will lead to a reduction in the overall socioeconomic burden caused by IS.

This study has several limitations. First, this study did not differentiate between infections due to spinal procedures, postoperative infections, or spontaneous infections. Considering the increasing trend of spinal procedures and surgeries, it would have been more helpful for clinical diagnosis if the incidences of IS had been differentiated according to its causes. Second, the exact causative pathogen type could not be identified in this study. The pathogen type is determined through culture; however, this information is often not accurately entered with the ICD-10 code. Finally, we could not analyze mortality due to IS. As IS is a life-threatening disease, studies investigating mortality rates are required; however, the direct causation of death is difficult to establish, especially in older patients with multiple comorbidities. Future studies are required to analyze this, along with risk factors that may affect mortality. Despite these limitations, the strengths of this study are that it identified the incidence rate, treatment trends, and characteristics of IS over 10 years in the entire population.

Conclusions

This population-based cohort study demonstrated that the incidence rate of IS has increased in South Korea. The proportion of patients receiving conservative treatment has increased, while that of patients who underwent surgical treatment has decreased. The socioeconomic burden of IS has increased rapidly.

Data Availability

Data are available from the Korea National Health Insurance Sharing Service (https://nhiss.nhis.or.kr/bd/ay/bdaya001iv.do;jsessionid=KiOt6ilaTGXMmR1mbeeA9Ax7nJjIYDsKr4UJAJvHhNyo511E0PovM1WfrGSaegL6.primrose22_servlet_engine1, Tel.: (82) 33-736-2432, 2433) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

This study received financial support from Eulji University in 2022 (Grant number: EJRG-22-12). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Kehrer M, Pedersen C, Jensen TG, Lassen AT. Increasing incidence of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a 14-year population-based study. Journal of infection. 2014;68(4):313–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gouliouris T, Aliyu SH, Brown NM. Spondylodiscitis: update on diagnosis and management. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2010;65(suppl_3):iii11-iii24. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Waheed G, Soliman MA, Ali AM, Aly MH. Spontaneous spondylodiscitis: review, incidence, management, and clinical outcome in 44 patients. Neurosurgical Focus. 2019;46(1):E10. doi: 10.3171/2018.10.FOCUS18463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hutchinson C, Hanger C, Wilkinson T, Sainsbury R, Pithie A. Spontaneous spinal infections in older people. Internal medicine journal. 2009;39(12):845–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.02052.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cottle L, Riordan T. Infectious spondylodiscitis. Journal of Infection. 2008;56(6):401–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2008.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Almansour H, Pepke W, Akbar M. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Der Orthopäde. 2020;49(6):482–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kim Y-I, Kim S-E, Jang HC, Jung S-I, Song SK, Park KH. Analysis of the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of infectious spondylitis. Infection & Chemotherapy. 2011;43(1):48–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fantoni M, Trecarichi EM, Rossi B, Mazzotta V, Di Giacomo G, Nasto L, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16(Suppl 2):2–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Trecarichi EM, Di Meco E, Mazzotta V, Fantoni M. Tuberculous spondylodiscitis: epidemiology, clinical features, treatment, and outcome. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16(Suppl 2):58–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim G-U, Park WT, Chang MC, Lee GW. Diagnostic Technology for Spine Pathology. Asian Spine Journal. 2022;16(5):764–75. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Herren C, Jung N, Pishnamaz M, Breuninger M, Siewe J, Sobottke R. Spondylodiscitis: diagnosis and treatment options: a systematic review. Deutsches Aerzteblatt International. 2017;114(51–52):875–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Skaf GS, Domloj NT, Fehlings MG, Bouclaous C, Sabbagh AS, Kanafani ZA, et al. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis: an overview. Journal of infection and public health. 2010;3(1):5–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2010.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Choi SH, Koo JW, Hur JM, Kang C-N. A new surgical strategy for infective spondylodiscitis: comparison between the combined antero-posterior and posterior-only approaches. Spine. 2020;45(19):E1239–E48. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Noh SH, Zhang HY, Lee SH, Choi JK, Chin DK. Changes in trends of spondylitis in Korea based on a nationwide database. Yonsei Medical Journal. 2019;60(5):487–9. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.5.487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Patel HA, Cheppalli NS, Bhandarkar AW, Patel V, Singla A. Lumbar Spinal Steroid Injections and Infection Risk after Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Asian Spine Journal. 2022;16(6):947–57. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Grammatico L, Baron S, Rusch E, Lepage B, Surer N, Desenclos J, et al. Epidemiology of vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) in France: analysis of hospital-discharge data 2002–2003. Epidemiology & Infection. 2008;136(5):653–60. doi: 10.1017/S0950268807008850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim YJ, Hong JB, Kim YS, Yi J, Choi JM, Sohn S. Change of pyogenic and tuberculous spondylitis between 2007 and 2016 year: a nationwide study. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2020;63(6):784–93. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kim CH, Chung CK, Kim MJ, Choi Y, Kim M-J, Shin S, et al. Increased volume of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and changes in surgical methods and outcomes: a nationwide cohort study with a 5-year follow-up. World neurosurgery. 2018;119:e313–e22. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee C-S, Park YJ, Moon JY, Kim Y-C. Deep spinal infection after outpatient epidural injections for pain: A retrospective sample cohort study using a claims database in South Korea. Anesthesiology. 2021;134(6):925–36. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Esme M, Topeli A, Yavuz BB, Akova M. Infections in the elderly critically-ill patients. Frontiers in medicine. 2019;6(118):1–9. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kobayashi K, Ando K, Nishida Y, Ishiguro N, Imagama S. Epidemiological trends in spine surgery over 10 years in a multicenter database. European Spine Journal. 2018;27(8):1698–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee C-H, Chung CK, Kim CH, Kwon J-W. Health care burden of spinal diseases in the Republic of Korea: analysis of a nationwide database from 2012 through 2016. Neurospine. 2018;15(1):66–76. doi: 10.14245/ns.1836038.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang X, Man K-W, Li GH-Y, Tan KC, Kung AW-C, Cheung C-L. Osteoporosis is a novel risk factor of infections and sepsis: A cohort study. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;49:101488. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cho KS. Tuberculosis control in the Republic of Korea. Epidemiology and health. 2018;40:e2018036. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2018036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Altini C, Lavelli V, Niccoli-Asabella A, Sardaro A, Branca A, Santo G, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic value of MRI and whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosis of spondylodiscitis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020;9(5):1581. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Slowinski J, Lucasti C, Maraschiello M, Kluczynski MA, Kowalski J, Hamill C. Minimally invasive spine surgery as treatment for persistent infectious lumbar spondylodiscitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Spine Surgery. 2022;8(1):1–8. doi: 10.21037/jss-21-50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fan G, Han R, Zhang H, He S, Chen Z. Worldwide research productivity in the field of minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine. 2017;42(22):1717–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kapsalaki E, Gatselis N, Stefos A, Makaritsis K, Vassiou A, Fezoulidis I, et al. Spontaneous spondylodiscitis: presentation, risk factors, diagnosis, management, and outcome. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2009;13(5):564–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2008.08.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Behmanesh B, Gessler F, Schnoes K, Dubinski D, Won S-Y, Konczalla J, et al. Infective endocarditis in patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis: implications for diagnosis and therapy. Neurosurgical Focus. 2019;46(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2018.10.FOCUS18445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sweileh WM. Health-related publications on people living in fragile states in the alert zone: a bibliometric analysis. International journal of mental health systems. 2020;14(1):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mavrogenis AF, Megaloikonomos PD, Igoumenou VG, Panagopoulos GN, Giannitsioti E, Papadopoulos A, et al. Spondylodiscitis revisited. EFORT Open Reviews. 2017;2(11):447–61. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Hiroshi Hashizume

10 Apr 2023

PONE-D-23-06492Incidence and Treatment Trends of Infectious Spondylodiscitis in South Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based StudyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: Please carefully read the reviewers' comments and respond adequately.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 25 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Hiroshi Hashizume, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: It is a useful data from big sample.

P4 line 68; Please explain about the abbreviation “TS”

P17 line 222;Provide citations for“several study”

Discussion

In the present results, women were more numerous and the age group with the highest number of respondents in their 50s. Can you please add further discussion on these matters?

Reviewer #2: I would like to thank the authors for submitting their wonderful work to the journal. It was my pleasure to have read the novel topic that investigated incidence and treatment trends of infectious spondylodiscitis (IS) in South Korea. The incidence rate of IS per 100,000 people in South Korea has increased 1.5-fold over the past 10 years, with Pyogenic spondylodiscitis increasing but tuberculosis spondylodiscitis decreasing. And conservative treatments increased, corpectomy and anterior fusion decreased among surgical treatments, and socioeconomic burden increased rapidly. I appreciate the scope/grandeur of such an important study work.

I have some comments for minor revise.

My specific comments on their work is noted below:

1; Introduction; “If bacteriological or histological confirmation is required, if there is intractable pain, if there is no improvement in symptoms despite appropriate antibiotics administration, if neurological paralysis occurs, or if there is spinal deformity, surgical treatment such as incision and drainage, decompression, corpectomy, and fusion may be performed.”

This sentence is not correct. Please look into by the English editor.

2; “ In recent years, the incidence of IS, especially PS, has been increasing due to the

increased numbers of older patients with chronic diseases, immunocompromised people, steroid use, drug abuse, invasive spinal procedures, and spinal surgeries.”

Please attach the references.

3; The author used female and male, sometimes women and men. Please unify the term.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Masatoshi Teraguchi

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: reviewers comment.docx

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 29;18(6):e0287846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287846.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


11 May 2023

Please refer to the attached file. (Revision notes.docx)

Decision Letter 1

Hiroshi Hashizume

13 Jun 2023

Incidence and Treatment Trends of Infectious Spondylodiscitis in South Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

PONE-D-23-06492R1

Dear Dr. Kang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Hiroshi Hashizume, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

All reviewers agree with the publication of your work. Congratulations!

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The author sincerely answered my questions. This paper is from a large sample and I think it will be useful.

Reviewer #2: Thank you for the revising article to be published. I feel that this study has been suitable for acceptance.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Hiroshi Hashizume

19 Jun 2023

PONE-D-23-06492R1

Incidence and Treatment Trends of Infectious Spondylodiscitis in South Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

Dear Dr. Kang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr Hiroshi Hashizume

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: reviewers comment.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data are available from the Korea National Health Insurance Sharing Service (https://nhiss.nhis.or.kr/bd/ay/bdaya001iv.do;jsessionid=KiOt6ilaTGXMmR1mbeeA9Ax7nJjIYDsKr4UJAJvHhNyo511E0PovM1WfrGSaegL6.primrose22_servlet_engine1, Tel.: (82) 33-736-2432, 2433) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES