Skip to main content
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology logoLink to Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
. 2023 Jun 16;11:1218099. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1218099

Chromosomal engineering of inducible isopropanol- butanol-ethanol production in Clostridium acetobutylicum

Bunmi B Omorotionmwan 1,, Hengzheng Wang 1, Jonathan P Baker 1,, Krzysztof Gizynski 1,, Minyeong Yoo 1, Cynthia Akaluka 1, Ying Zhang 1, Nigel P Minton 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC10312008  PMID: 37397966

Abstract

The use of environmentally damaging petrochemical feedstocks can be displaced by fermentation processes based on engineered microbial chassis that recycle biomass-derived carbon into chemicals and fuels. The stable retention of introduced genes, designed to extend product range and/or increase productivity, is essential. Accordingly, we have created multiply marked auxotrophic strains of Clostridium acetobutylicum that provide distinct loci (pyrE, argH, purD, pheA) at which heterologous genes can be rapidly integrated using allele-coupled exchange (ACE). For each locus, ACE-mediated insertion is conveniently selected on the basis of the restoration of prototrophy on minimal media. The Clostridioides difficile gene (tcdR) encoding an orthogonal sigma factor (TcdR) was integrated at the pyrE locus under the control of the lactose-inducible, bgaR::P bgaL promoter to allow the simultaneous control of genes/operons inserted at other disparate loci (purD and pheA) that had been placed under the control of the P tcdB promoter. In control experiments, dose-dependent expression of a catP reporter gene was observed with increasing lactose concentration. At the highest doses tested (10 mM) the level of expression was over 10-fold higher than if catP was placed directly under the control of bgaR::P bgaL and over 2-fold greater than achieved using the strong P fdx promoter of the Clostridium sporogenes ferredoxin gene. The utility of the system was demonstrated in the production of isopropanol by the C. acetobutylicum strain carrying an integrated copy of tcdR following the insertion of a synthetic acetone operon (ctfA/B, adc) at the purD locus and a gene (sadh) encoding a secondary dehydrogenase at pheA. Lactose induction (10 mM) resulted in the production of 4.4 g/L isopropanol and 19.8 g/L Isopropanol-Butanol-Ethanol mixture.

Keywords: auxotroph, orthogonal, inducible system, isopropanol-butanol-ethanol, Clostridium, allele-coupled exchange

1 Introduction

The production of chemicals and fuels through the recycling of biomass-derived carbon using biological fermentation processes has an increasingly important role to play in displacing environmentally damaging petrochemical feedstocks. Although some microorganisms naturally produce the requisite chemicals, metabolic engineering has a major role to play, both in enhancing productivity and extending product streams. Largely reliant on the provision and optimized expression of the necessary encoding genes, engineered strains invariably carry the requisite pathways on autonomous plasmids. One consequence is that the introduced plasmid, together with the engineered pathway, can be lost due to segregational instability. Although this can be avoided through the provision of a vector encoded antibiotic resistance gene and inclusion in the media of antibiotics, such practices are unwise if the spread of antimicrobial resistance is to be controlled. One solution is to stably integrate the requisite pathways into the genome.

We have previously described a procedure whereby DNA of any size or complexity can be rapidly integrated into the genome, termed Allele-Coupled Exchange (ACE). Initially exemplified in Clostridium acetobutylicum (Heap et al., 2012), its deployment has been largely confined to anaerobic bacteria and in particular clostridia. Although more generally associated with human and animal disease, clostridia are of increasing industrial importance, and in particular solvent producing Clostridium species such as Clostridium acetobutylicum and Clostridium beijerinckii, have been target chassis for strain engineering towards improved solvent production (Mermelstein and Papoutsakis, 1993; Jang et al., 2012; Jang et al., 2013; Ehsaan et al., 2016; Nguyen et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018; Xin et al., 2020).

The preferred embodiment of the ACE method developed in C. acetobutylicum targets the native pyrE gene which encodes orotate phosphoribosyltransferase and is part of the pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway. ACE is initially employed to replace the wildtype gene with a mutant allele lacking codons from the 3′ end of the structural gene. The mutant created becomes an uracil auxotroph resistant to 5-fluoro-orotate (FOA) and can be rapidly converted back to wildtype using a purpose built ACE correction vector, selecting for uracil prototrophy. Concomitant with pyrE repair, additional DNA fragments can be delivered to the genome. In the current report we have extended the number of auxotrophic mutant loci at which ACE may be employed to introduce cargo to three additional alleles, namely, deletion mutants of purD, argH and pheA. The former encodes phosphoribosylamine–glycine ligase, involved in the de novo synthesis of purine nucleotides. The argH and pheA genes code for argininosuccinate lyase and prephenate dehydratase which are involved in arginine and phenylalanine biosynthesis, respectively. The equivalent deletions to that of pyrE in these genes were made using a newly developed knock-out vector that allows the positive selection of in-frame deletions. The resultant ∆purD, ∆argH and ∆pheA mutants respectively required supplementation with a purine cocktail (comprising adenine, guanine and hypoxanthine), arginine or phenylalanine to support growth on minimal media. The successful ACE-mediated integration of DNA at these sites using the requisite correction vectors is simply selected by the conversion of integrants to prototrophy.

The provision of three different loci in the same cell allows the stable, independent integration of different components of a metabolic pathway. Here we use the one locus (pyrE) to integrate an orthogonal sigma factor responsible for the expression of the genes inserted at two other loci (purD and pheA) which together bring about the production of acetone and isopropanol. This arrangement allows all of the genes of a pathway to be under the same regulatory control despite their disparate location around the genome.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Bacteria strains and plasmids

All bacteria strains and plasmids used are given in Table 1. Plasmids may be sourced from www.plasmidvectors.com.

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used.

Bacteria/Plasmids Description/Features Source
Strains a
E. coli Top10 Cloning and plasmid storage host Invitrogen, Ltd
E. coli Top10 (pAN2) Top10 carrying pAN2 methylation plasmid Heap et al. (2007)
C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 WT parental strain Rostock, Germany
C. acetobutylicum ΔpyrE::dif ΔpyrE mutant created by ACE Ehsaan et al. (2016)
C. acetobutylicum ΔpheA::dif ΔpheA auxotrophic mutant This study
C. acetobutylicum ΔpurD::dif ΔpurD auxotrophic mutant This study
C. acetobutylicum ΔargH::dif ΔargH auxotrophic mutant This study
C.acetobutylicum ΔpyrE::dif, ΔargH::dif ΔpyrE & ΔargH double auxotroph This study
C. acetobutylicum ΔΔpyrE::dif, ΔpurD::dif ΔpyrE & ΔpurD double auxotroph This study
C. acetobutylicum ΔpyrE::dif, ΔpurD::dif, ΔpheA::dif ΔpyrE, ΔpurD, ΔpheA triple auxotroph This study
C. acetobutylicum 824BO1 bgaR-P bgal -tcdR integrated at the pyrE locus This study
C. acetobutylicum 824BO2 bgaR-P bgal -tcdR at pyrE locus, P tcdB -ctfA/B-adc at the purD locus, WT pheA locus This study
C. acetobutylicum 824BO3 bgaR-P bgal -tcdR at pyrE locus, P tcdB -ctfA/B-adc at the purD locus and P tcdB -sadh at pheA This study
Plasmid
pMTL82254 Modular reporter vector for clostridia; pBP1 Gram-positive replicon, ColE1+tra Gram-negative replicon, ermB antibiotic marker with catP reporter Heap et al. (2009)
pMTL85121 Modular vector for clostridia; pIM13 Gram-positive replicon, p15a + tra Gram-negative replicon, catP antibiotic marker and multiple cloning site Heap et al. (2009)
pMTL_SC7515 Knock-out plasmid for clostridia; pIM13 Gram-positive replicon, codA in backbone; ColE1 Gram-negative replicon, catP antibiotic marker and multiple cloning site Cartman et al. (2012)
pMTL-KG146 Novel Suicide Knock-out plasmid for clostridia; codA in backbone; ColE1 replicon, marker cassette comprising catP and pyrEflanked by identical repeats of random 29 bp sequence This Study
pMTL-KG147 Novel Suicide Knock-out plasmid for clostridia; codA in backbone; ColE1 replicon, marker cassette comprising catP and pyrE flanked by identical repeats of the predicted C. acetobutylicum dif sequence. This Study
pMTL-KG147_argH pMTL-KG147 with homology arms to mediate argH knock-out This Study
pMTL-KG147_pheA pMTL-KG147 with homology arms to mediate pheA knock-out This Study
pMTL-KG147_purD pMTL-KG147 with homology arms to mediate purD knock-out This Study
pMTLME6C pyrE complementation plasmid and backbone for purD and pheA complementation/expression plasmids pIM13/ColE1 replicon; CmR/TmR Ng et al. (2013)
pMTL-BO1C purD complementation plasmid based on pMTLME6C This Study
pMTL-HZ1C pheA complementation plasmid based on pMTLME6C This Study
pMTL-HZ2C argH complementation plasmid based on pMTLME6C This Study
pMTL82254::PtcdB The reporter plasmid pMTL82254 in which the catP gene has been placed under the transcriptional control of the P tcdB promoter. This Study
pMTL82254::Pfdx The reporter plasmid pMTL82254 in which the catP gene has been placed under the transcriptional control of the P fdx promoter. This Study
pMTL82254::PbgaL The reporter plasmid pMTL82254 in which the catP gene has been placed under the transcriptional control of the bgaR-Pbgal inducible promoter system. This Study
pMTL-HZ13-HZ-tcdR ACE complementation vector for the pyrE locus carrying tcdR under the control of the bgaR-Pbgal inducible promoter system. This Study
pMTL-BO16-PtcdB-ctfAB-adc ACE complementation vector for the purD locus carrying the genes necessary for acetone production, ctfAB and adc. This Study
pMTL-HZ15-PtcdB-SadH ACE complementation vector for the pheA locus carrying the gene necessary for isopropanol production, sadh. This Study
a

While auxotrophic mutants with either a dif or ran scar were made, for consistency all the in-frame deletion mutants used in the study carry the dif sequence.

2.2 Culture conditions

C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 and its derivatives were grown in the Clostridial Growth Medium (CGM) of Hartmanis and Gatenbeck (1984), P2 minimal medium (Baer et al., 1987) or 2xYeast Tryptone Glucose (YTG) broth (Mermelstein et al., 1992). Growth was at 37°C in an anaerobic cabinet (MG1000 Anaerobic Workstation, Don Whitley Scientific Ltd) containing an atmosphere of 80% nitrogen, 10% hydrogen and 10% carbon dioxide. Escherichia coli strains were grown in Luria Bertani (LB) Medium (Sambrook et al., 1989) at 37°C. When necessary, solid and liquid media for E. coli was supplemented with 25 μg/mL and 12.5 μg/mL of chloramphenicol, respectively. Tetracycline was always added at a concentration of 10 μg/mL. Clostridial media was supplemented when needed with 15 μg/mL of thiamphenicol and 10 μg/mL of erythromycin. Pyrimidine and purine auxotrophic mutants were respectively supplemented with 20 μg/mL of uracil and a purine cocktail made up of equal proportions of adenine, guanine and hypoxanthine. The counter-selective agent 5-fluoroorotic acid was included in agar media when needed at 400 μg/mL.

2.3 Transformation of C. acetobutylicum

A heavy loop of C. acetobutylicum was inoculated into 10 mL of 2 × YTG media in serial dilutions and grown in an anaerobic cabinet at 37°C overnight. A conical flask containing 310 mL of 2 × YTG medium was inoculated with 10 mL of the overnight culture representing the lowest dilution that still exhibited good growth and incubated as before until an OD600 of 0.2–0.25 was reached. The culture was transferred to six 50 mL falcon tubes and centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C, 5,000 × g. Pelleted cells were resuspended in 40 mL of ice-cold electroporation buffer (EPB) by shaking or gentle pipetting. EPB comprised 270 mM Sucrose, 5 mM Na2HPO4 and 5 mM NaH2PO4 and pH was adjusted to 7.4. Cell suspensions were centrifuged as before in six separate centrifuge tubes and the pellets obtained resuspended in 15 mL of ice cold EPB. The resuspended contents of three tubes were combined into a single centrifuge tube and centrifuged as before. The pellets were resuspended in 0.8 mL ice cold EPB by gentle pipetting and then combined. The competent cells were ready to electroporate after adding 10% (w/v) DMSO. The competent cells with 10% DMSO can be aliquoted and stored at −80°C for up to 8 weeks with no change in observable competence. Frozen cells were defrosted in ice for 20 min, then electroporated as described above.

For electroporation, at least 10 μg of methylated plasmid DNA and 590 μL of competent cells were transferred gently into an ice-cold electroporation cuvette (Biorad) and incubated for 2 min on ice. The mixture was electroporated using 2.0 kV, 25 μF and ∞Ω program on a BioRad Gene pulser before addition of 1 mL of warm (37°C) anaerobic 2 × YTG. The culture was transferred into a universal tube containing 9 mL 2 × YTG and incubated for at least 4 h in an anaerobic cabinet at 37°C. Cells were harvested as before at room temperature and pellets were resuspended in 0.5 mL of fresh pre-warmed (37°C) anaerobic 2 × YTG and plated onto CGM agar plates with appropriate antibiotic supplementation.

Prior to transformation, plasmid DNA was purified from E. coli TOP10 cells containing plasmid pAN2 (Heap et al., 2007). This plasmid contains the ϕ3TI methyltransferase gene of B. subtilis phage ϕ3tI, which protects DNA from C. acetobutylicum Cac824I DNA restriction activity (Mermelstein and Papoutsakis., 1993, Heap et al., 2007).

2.4 Plasmids and DNA modification techniques

Chromosomal and plasmid DNA preparation, purification of DNA gel fragments and DNA clean-up was undertaken using Qiagen kits, United Kingdom (DNeasy Tissue kit, QIAprep Miniprep kit and QIAquick Gel Extraction kit). Restriction enzymes were from the New England Biolabs and used according to manufacturer’s instructions. Phusion High Fidelity and DreamTaq DNA polymerases (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United Kingdom) were used for PCR amplifications. Agarose gel electrophoresis was carried out as described (Sambrook et al., 1989) and oligonucleotides were synthesized by Merck, UK.

2.5 Knock-out plasmid design

The knock-out vectors used to generate the required deletion mutants, pMTL-KG146 and pMTL-KG147 (Figure 1A) make use of the two counter-selection markers codA (encodes cytosine deaminase) and pyrE (encodes orotate phosphoribosyltransferase), as well as a positive selection marker, catP (coding for chloramphenicol acetyl transferase and conferring resistance to thiamphenicol). Acquisition of a functional codA gene by the clostridial target makes cells sensitive to 5-Fluorocytosine (5FC), whereas the presence of a functional pyrE gene renders cells sensitive (S) to 5-Fluoroorotic acid (FOA). It follows that cells acquire resistance (R) to 5FC and FOA following the respective removal/inactivation of codA or pyrE. While codA resides on the vector backbone, catP and pyrE are tandemly located within the mutant allele, between the two homology arms (HAs). Moreover, the DNA fragment carrying catP::pyrE are flanked by identical, small repeat sequences able to mediate deletion of the entire intervening region (Figure 1A). These equate to the predicted (Carnoy and Roten, 2009) 28 bp C. acetobutylicum dif sequence (5′-GAA​GAC​TAT​AAT​GGA​TAT​TAT​GTT​AAA​T-3′) in plasmid pMTL-KG147 and a random (ran) 29 bp sequence (5′-AGC​TAT​CTC​AGA​TAC​GAT​CGA​TTA-CAA​CC-3′) in plasmid pMTL-KG146. The dif sequence has previously been shown to be highly effective at bringing about Xer recombinase-mediated excision of marker genes from bacterial chromosomes (Bloor and Cranenburgh, 2006). Exploitation of the pyrE gene necessitates that the host used for mutant generation has a deletion in its chromosomal copy, equivalent to that previously described (Ehsaan et al., 2016), and is therefore FOAR.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Suicide plasmid, pMTL-KG146/7 for in-frame deletion in clostridia. (A) Both plasmids carry the Gram-negative ColE1 replication region but no Gram-positive replicon. They possess the counter-selection markers codA (cytosine deaminase) and pyrE (orotate phosphoribosyltransferase). The latter is preceded by the positive selection marker catP (chloramphenicol acetyl transferase) with the two genes flanked by identical repeat regions. These comprise a random 29 bp sequence (ran) in the case of pMTL-KG146, whereas pMTL-KG-147 carries the predicted C. acetobutylicum dif sequence. Flanking the repeat sequences are two different pairs of 8 nt recognition sites into which homology arms (HAs) are cloned. These are the sites for the restriction enzymes MreI and FspAI in the case of the left HA (LHA) and SgrDI and MauBI for the right HA (RHA). The DNA, typically between 500 and 1,000 bp, comprising the LHA and RHA are PCR amplified using region-specific primers P1-P4. The P2 primer is designed such that the ATG of the FspAI site equates to the start codon of the gene to be deleted (e.g., gene “B” in the example) whereas primer P3 includes the indicated TAA stop codon that follows the SgrDI recognition site. (B) Following isolation of the double crossover mutant on media supplemented with thiamphenicol and 5FC, colonies are plated on media containing FOA which selects for those cells that have lost the DNA region encoding pyrE::catP as a result of recombination between the two repeat regions. Flip-out of this DNA leads to the presence of a single copy of the repeat region in the genome and the creation of an in-frame deletion in gene “B” encoding a common 15 amino acid peptide. This differs depending on which plasmid is used, pMTL-KG146 or pMTL-KG147.

The vector design, and in particular the relative positioning of the left and right HAs (LHA and RHA), is such that the deletion event mediated by either repeat results in the creation of a small ORF (Figure 1B). The translational start and stop codon of the encoded peptide are synonymous to those of the gene being targeted for deletion. This is ensured by the PCR amplification of the region of DNA encompassing the LHA using primers that create a distal and proximal MreI (CGCCGGCG) and FspAI (ATGCGCAT) recognition sites in which the ATG of the latter corresponds to the translational start codon of the gene targeted for deletion. In the case of the RHA, through the use of appropriate oligonucleotide primers, the amplified DNA fragment is designed to encompass flanking recognition sites for SgrDI and MauBI (GTCGACG) such that the recognition site of the latter is immediately followed by a TAA codon that corresponds to the translational stop codon of the gene targeted for deletion. As a consequence of this HA design and use of the created restriction sites for cloning, the subsequent repeat region deletion event leads to creation of a mutant allele comprising an in-frame deletion that encodes a 15 amino acid peptide. Dependent on the repeat region, the encoded peptide is always the same, equating to MRISYLRYDRLQPST in the case of ran and MRIEDYNGYYVKSST in the case of the dif sequence (Figure 1B).

The two vectors were generated using Gibson assembly. Firstly, primers codA_F, codA_R, colE1_F and colE1_R were used to amplify catP, codA and ColE1 from plasmid pMTL_SC7515 (Cartman et al., 2012) with Q5 polymerase; primers catP_F1 (dif), catP_F2 (ran), catP_R, pyrE_F, pyrE_R1 (dif) and pyrE_R2 (ran) were used to amplify catP and pyrE from pMTL_ME6 (Ehsaan et al., 2016). All PCR fragments were assembled in a four-fragment Gibson assembly. This resulted in pMTL-KG146 and pMTL-KG147 which were transformed in E. coli DH5α using heat shock according to New England Biolabs (NEB) instructions. After growth of colonies, PCR screening and miniprep, the correct plasmids were used for the construction of knock-out vectors as described in Supplementary Material.

2.6 Target sites for gene integration using ACE

To select alternative genomic loci at which heterologous genes could be integrated using ACE, three essential criteria were required: i) like pyrE, they should represent the last gene of an operon, thereby preventing polar effects on downstream genes following subsequent insertion of cargo DNA; ii) their inactivation should result in an easily detectable phenotype, most obviously auxotrophy, and; iii) their restoration should be selectable, most simply through acquisition of prototrophy. Three promising candidates were identified as pheA (CAC0217, prephenate dehydratase), purD (CAC1396, phosphoribosylamine–glycine ligase) argH (CAC0974, argininosuccinate lyase). Their respective inactivation should lead to phenylalanine (Nelms et al., 1992), purine (Truong et al., 2015) and arginine auxotrophy (Reimers et al., 2004).

To act as loci for ACE-mediated cargo insertions, the mutant allele targeted should comprise a gene with a truncated 3‘-end, but which still retains its 5′-end and non-coding region, as exemplified with the pyrE made in C. acetobutylicum (Heap et al., 2012). Accordingly, the requisite 1,000 bp homology arms were PCR amplified from each gene using primers that incorporated either the restriction recognition sites MreI and FspAI (Left Homology Arm, LHA) or SgrDI and MauBI (Right Homology Arm, RHA). These sites allowed the subsequent restriction cloning of the HAs into either plasmid pMTL-KG146 or pMTL-KG147 following their appropriate sequential cleavage with MreI/FspAI and SgrDI and MauBI. For full details of the plasmids constructed, see Supplementary Material. Mutant alleles of the three targeted genes were respectively truncated from codon positions 176, 282 and 302 for genes pheA, purD and argH.

Mutation of the three genes was undertaken in the pyrE mutant. Following its transformation with the three different KO derivatives of pMTL-KG146 and pMTL-KG147, transformants were selected on CBM agar supplemented with either: i) thiamphenicol, or with; ii) thiamphenicol and 5FC. In addition to these selective agents, the media was additionally supplemented with uracil (to compensate for the pyrE deletion) and either arginine (for pMTL-KG146_argH and pMTL-KG147_argH), phenylalanine (for pMTL-KG146_pheA and pMTL-KG147_pheA) or a cocktail of adenine, guanine and hypoxanthine (for pMTL-KG146_purD and pMTL-KG147_purD). Colonies that arose on i) represented predominately single crossover mutants, whereas those that arose on ii) were double crossover mutants. In the event no colonies were obtained on ii) then TmR colonies from i) could be passaged on the media of ii) to obtain the desired double crossover mutant. Following their isolation, the TmR-5FCR mutants were plated onto Tm- and uracil-deficient media containing FOA and, dependent on the gene being targeted, supplemented with arginine, phenylalanine or the purine cocktail. Cells in which the catP::pyrE cassette flips out, due to recombination between the direct repeats that flank the cassette become resistant to FOA, as now the only pyrE allele in the cell is the original mutant one. Their identity as the desired mutant was confirmed by PCR using appropriate gene flanking primers (see Supplementary Table S1) followed by Sanger sequencing of gene fragments. Further confirmation that the catP::pyrE fragment had excised was obtained by showing the cells no longer grew on agar media supplemented with Tm.

2.7 ACE complementation vectors

It has previously proven possible to deliver cargo DNA into the C. acetobutylicum chromosome at the mutant pyrE locus concomitant with its restoration to wildtype using the complementation ACE vector pMTL-ME6C (Ehsaan et al., 2016). This plasmid carries a 300 bp Short Homology Arm (SHA), comprising a 5′ truncated pyrE allele (missing 13 codons), and a 1,200 bp Long Homology Arm (LHA) encompassing the region of DNA immediately downstream of the pyrE gene. Positioned between the two HAs are a number of restriction enzyme recognition sites into which cargo DNA may be cloned. When transformed into an appropriate pyrE mutant, the plasmid preferentially integrates through recombination at the larger RHA, to produce faster growing TmR cells. When these are streaked onto CBM media lacking uracil, it selects cells in which recombination at the LHA has led to restoration of the pyrE locus to wildtype (prototrophy) and excision of the plasmid. Concomitant with restoration of pyrE any cargo DNA cloned between the restriction sites becomes integrated into the genome immediately downstream of pyrE. The use of this system provides an extremely rapid, simple and failsafesimple means of delivering cargo DNA into the genome—restoration of prototrophy cannot arise by means other than the intended integration event. Integration is, however, limited to this one locus.

To extend the sites to which DNA may be delivered, equivalent complementation vectors to pMTL-ME6C were constructed for the three loci, pheA, argH and purD. These were made by replacing the pyrE locus-derived SHA and LHA of pMTL-ME6C. These are respectively flanked by either a SbfI and NotI restriction recognition site, or by NdeI and AscI sites. Accordingly, the equivalent regions of the pheA, argH and purD loci were PCR amplified using primers that incorporated the necessary restriction endonuclease recognition sites, and the DNA fragment generated following their cleavage with either SbfI and NotI (LHA) or NdeI and AscI (RHA) cloned in place of the pyrE regions of pMTL-ME6C. In the case of pheA, for example, primers pheA_CLHA_F and pheA_CLHA_R were used to amplify the LHA and pheA_CLHA_F and pheA_CLHA_R to amplify the RHA. Full details of the construction of these plasmids is given in the Supplementary Material. The plasmids generated (Supplementary Figure S1) were designated pMTL-HZ1C (pheA), pMTL-HZ2C (argH) and pMTL-BO1C (purD).

2.8 Fermentation and metabolite profile analysis

pH-controlled fermentation was carried out in Multifors bioreactors (Infors UK Ltd., UK) with a working volume of 400 mL. CGM medium supplemented with glucose (80 g/L) was sparged with nitrogen for 1 h before inoculation (Dusseaux et al., 2013). Cultures were stirred at 200 rpm, the temperature was set to 35°C, and the pH was maintained above 5.0 by addition of 3 M ammonia solution. The precultures were grown in CGM supplemented with glucose (60 g/L) under strict anaerobic condition and inoculation of pH-controlled fermentations to an initial OD600 ca. 0.2. Lactose induction was performed after 6 h sampling at a final concentration of 10 mM.

Metabolites were determined by HPLC analysis (Dionex UltiMate 3000 HPLC system, ThermoFisher Scientific). Biorad Aminex HPX-87H column (300 mm × 7.8 mm) was used for separation and a refractive index detector (to analyse glucose, ethanol, and butanol) and UV detectors (absorbance at 210 nm for acids, 280 nm for acetone) were used for detection, respectively. Samples were diluted two times and run at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min at 20°C in 5 mM H2SO4 mobile phase for 1 h.

2.9 CAT enzyme assay

Strains were grown in 2xYTG media supplemented with erythromycin, samples were collected at various time points and centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and the pellets stored at −80°C. Lactose induction was performed at mid-log phase. Cell pellets were re-suspended in 0.5 mL of PBS supplemented with Roche Complete protease inhibitor cocktail tablets and lysed by sonication using a Sonifier S-450D (Branson Ultrasonics Corp., Danbury, CT, United States). The lysates were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C and transferred into new Eppendorf tubes for further analysis. CAT enzyme assay was undertaken according to the method described by Shaw (1975). A quartz cuvette was prepared containing 540 µL of 100 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.8), 200 µL of 2.5 mM DTNB Solution (5,5′-Dithio-bis (2-Nitrobenzoic Acid) in 100 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.8), 200 µL of 5.0 mM fresh prepared acetyl Coenzyme A solution in deionized water and 10 µL of cell lysate. The cuvette was pre-warmed to 25°C, and the reaction initiated by adding 10 µL of 0.3% (w/v) chloramphenicol solution. The increase in absorbance at 412 nm was recorded.

To calculate Units/mL in the lysate, the following equation was used where 0.2 is the total volume (in mL) of assay, df is the dilution factor, 0.0136 is the micromolar extinction coefficient for DTNB at 412 nm, and 0.01 is the volume of cell lysate used.

Units/mL CAT=ΔA412/min testΔA412/min blank 0.2 df0.01360.01

3 Results

3.1 Maximising transformation frequencies in C. acetobutylicum

As the envisaged knock-out strategy was based on the direct selection of double crossover mutants using suicide vectors, it was first necessary to optimize the transformation efficiency. A number of empirical alterations were therefore made to the originally described C. acetobutylicum transformation protocol (Mermelstein et al., 1992), and in particular to the steps involved in the preparation of competent cells. Similar to Herman et al. (2017), these included the addition of an extra EPB wash step and the extension of the 1–3 h recovery period after electroporation to at least 4 h. The principal difference between the two protocols, however, was that the vegetative cells for the preparation of competent cells were harvested at a much earlier phase of growth (OD600 of 0.2–0.25 as opposed to 1.1). The benefits of these modifications were demonstrated by transforming methylated pMTL851241 into competent C. acetobutylicum cells prepared by the two protocols. The Comparative transformation experiments with both methods were undertaken in triplicate and the average transformation efficiency in cfu per μg of plasmid shown to be 1.95E+03 ± 6.65E+02 and 6.41E+06 ± 2.04E+06 for the previous (Mermelstein et al., 1992) and the modified protocols, respectively (Figure 2). This represented a 3-log increase in transformation efficiency.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Improved transformation efficiency for C. acetobutylicum. Compared are the previously described protocol of Mermelstein et al. (1992) and the modified protocol described here. Experiments were undertaken in triplicate. Results are expressed as number of transformants per μg of plasmid pMTL85121 DNA.

3.2 Exemplification and use of the knock-out (KO) system

When pMTL-KG146/7 plasmid derivatives carrying an appropriate mutant allele are transformed into the target clostridia, thiamphenicol (Tm) resistant (R) transformants can only arise if catP integrates into the genome following recombination between one or both of the plasmid-borne HAs and the equivalent region in the genome. Co-supplementation of media with 5FC ensures that the cells have lost the codA-bearing plasmid backbone and are, therefore, double crossover mutants. However, as with all insertional mutants of this type, the mutant generated is disadvantaged by the fact that the substantial size of the inserted marker (pyrE::catP) is likely to exert polar effects on flanking genes. Moreover, the same marker cannot be used again to generate a second mutation in the same cell. Fortunately, it is easily removed to generate a clean, in-frame deletion mutant by plating the TmR, 5FCR cells onto agar media lacking Tm but containing FOA. This selects for FOAR cells in which pyrE (together with catP) has been excised due to resolution of the two directly repeated dif/ran sites to a single site by the hosts Xer site-specific recombinases (Bloor and Cranenburg, 2006). More importantly, the nature of the repeat sequences is such that an in-frame deletion of the targeted gene is formed—see Figure 1B.

In the initial experiments, KO plasmids targeting the three genes (pheA, purD, argH) were designed and built carrying appropriate homology arms and either the predicted dif sequence of C. acetobutylicum or a random 29 bp repeat sequence (ran) positioned at either end of the catP-pyrE. In all cases, using the new transformation procedure, between 1.0 and 2.0 × 101 transformants were consistently obtained when plated on media supplemented with Tm. When plated on media additionally supplemented with 5FC, the numbers were slightly reduced, but in every instance several clones were routinely obtained. Moreover, in all cases, PCR screening indicated that the expected insertional mutant had been generated as a consequence of a double crossover integration.

Following their appearance, a representative TmR 5FCR colony was restreaked onto CBM media supplemented with FOA and the supplement appropriate to the gene being targeted. These equated to phenylalanine in the case of pheA, arginine in the case of argH and a purine cocktail (adenine, guanine and hypoxanthine) in the case of purD. PCR screening of the FOAR colonies obtained demonstrated that clones in which the catP-pyrE DNA segment had flipped out were always present and arose at an average frequency of 36% for the dif repeat sequence and 37% for ran, respectively.

Having generated the three double auxotrophic mutants, growth of each on P2 minimal media was shown (Supplementary Figure S2) to be restored through supplementation of the media with uracil and either phenylalanine (ΔpyrEpheA mutant), purines (ΔpyrEpurD mutant) or arginine (ΔpyrEargH mutant). Restoration of the mutants to prototrophy was also demonstrated by assembling specific ACE complementation vectors, equivalent to that previously described for the pyrE gene, plasmid pMTL-MEC6 (Ehsaan et al., 2016) and using ACE to replace each genomic mutant allele with a wildtype copy of the gene. This involved transforming a mutant (e.g., the ΔpyrEpheA mutant) with the requisite ACE complementation vector (e.g., pMTL-HZ1C), selecting a transformant colony on CGM media supplemented with thiamphenicol, and then streaking the colony onto P2 media supplemented with only uracil, and not, for instance, phenylalanine. In parallel, plasmid pMTL-JH14 (Heap et al., 2012) was used to restore the pyrE locus of each of the double mutants to uracil prototrophy, creating single mutants defective in pheA, purD and argH.

Finally, as the envisaged metabolic engineering strategy would require three mutant loci in the same cell, a triple auxotrophic mutant was made by knocking out the purD gene in the ΔpyrEΔpheA double mutant and resultant triple auxotrophic mutant, ΔpyrEΔpheAΔpurD, shown to be only capable of growth on P2 minimal medium supplemented with uracil, phenylalanine and the purine cocktail (Supplementary Figure S2).

3.3 Functionality of lactose inducible orthogonal expression system

In the current investigation we wished to explore the possibility of providing three different loci in the same cell to allow the stable, independent integration of different components of a metabolic pathway. Although the genes of a pathway may be disparately located, it is desirable that they are subject to common regulatory control. This may be achieved through the deployment of an orthogonal expression system (An and Chin, 2009; An and Chin, 2011; Costello and Badran, 2021). We have previously described a clostridial-derived orthogonal expression system (Zhang et al., 2015) based on the Clostridioides difficile (formerly Clostridium difficile) TcdR sigma factor that only recognises the promoter sequences of the tcdA and tcdB toxin genes (Dupuy et al., 2006). This was used to instigate transposition in C.acetobutylicum by placing the transposase of the mariner transposon used under the control of the P tcdB promoter. The system was more recently refined in C. autoethanogenum (Woods et al., 2022) by placing expression of tcdR under the control of a lactose inducible system (bgaR-P bgaL ) from C. perfringens (Hartman et al., 2011).

To test the suitability of the lactose-induced orthogonal system in C. acetobutylicum, the bgaR-P bgaL ::tcdR expression cassette described by Woods et al. (2022) was integrated into the pyrE locus of C. acetobutylicum following its subcloning into pMTL-ME6C. The isolated strain was designated 824BO1. In parallel, the three promoter P tcdB , P fdx and P bgaL , the latter in combination with bgaR, were inserted into the modular reporter vector pMTL82254 (Heap et al., 2009) to give plasmids pMTL82254::PtcdB, pMTL82254::Pfdx and pMTL82254::PbgaL, respectively (Figure 3). The former two plasmids were transformed into the C. acetobutylicum strain 824BO1, while the latter was transferred into the 824 WT strain. Each of the resultant transformants clones were cultivated in 2YTG medium and the level of CAT activity present in the cell lysates of harvested cells measured periodically. Replicate cultures of those cells carrying the bgaR-P bgaL inducible system were induced with lactose 4 h after inoculation. In the case of WT cells carrying plasmid pMTL82254::PbgaL, the level of CAT activity some 6 h after induction with 1 and 10 mM lactose equated to 102 and 195 units/mg protein, respectively. In contrast, the levels in 824BO1, in which catP expression was indirectly regulated by lactose via the TcdR-based orthogonal system, were over 10-fold higher. Thus, CAT activity 6 h after induction with either 1 or 10 mM lactose corresponded to 1,560 and 2,209 units/mg protein, respectively (Figure 3). The level of expression achieved under both induction conditions were greater than that seen in cells carrying the plasmid (pMTL82254::Pfdx) in which catP was under the control of the strong P fdx promoter, where CAT levels reached 933 units mg/protein.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Controlled expression of the catP using a lactose inducible orthogonal TcdR system. The C. acetobutylicum hosts used were either the WT strain (A) or 824BO1 (B), the latter of which carried an integrated copy of tcdR at the pyrE locus under the control of the BgaR::P bgaL lactose inducible promoter system. Strain 824BO1 was transformed with derivatives of the reporter plasmid pMTL82254 (Heap et al., 2009) in which the catP gene was placed either under the control of the P tcdB or P fdx promoter. The WT was transformed with an equivalent plasmid but in which catP was under the control of bgaR::PbgaL. Cells were grown in 2YTG media and induced with lactose after 4 h (downward facing arrow) at concentrations of 0, 1.0, 1.0 and 10 mM. Also included was a C. acetobutylicum negative control carrying the reporter vector pMTL82254 alone with no promoter (None). Experiments were performed in triplicate.

3.4 Generation of acetone and isopropanol producing strains in the triple auxotroph

In order to test the utility of multiply marked auxotrophic mutants, we chose to integrate the genes necessary for production of acetone (ctfA/B and adc, encoding CoA transferase and acetoacetate decarboxylase, respectively) and isopropanol (sadh, codes for a secondary alcohol dehydrogenase, from Clostridium beijerinckii) at two different loci and to place them both under the control of the P tcdB promoter. Transcription from both copies of this promoter would be mediated by TcdR produced from the tcdR gene integrated at the pyrE locus and under the control of the lactose inducible P bgaL promoter (Figure 4). As the proposed strategy required just three loci, only pyrE, pheA and purD were selected and an appropriate triple auxotrophic mutant made carrying all three deletions. Those genes necessary for the production of acetone (P tcdb ::ctfA/B-adc) were integrated at the purD locus using the ACE PurD complementation vector pMTL-BO1C, whereas the gene required for production of isopropanol (P tcdB ::sadh) was inserted at the pheA locus using the ACE PheA complementation vector, pMTL-HZ1C. This led to the creation of three strains: i) 824BO1, carrying tcdR at the pyrE locus; ii) 824BO2, as 824BO1 but with the acetone operon at the purD locus, and; iii) 824BO3, as 824BO2, but with the secondary alcohol dehydrogenase at the pheA locus. The pheA and purD loci of strain 824BO1, and the pheA locus of 824BO2, were all converted back to wildtype using the appropriate ACE correction vector prior to the analysis of the strains in fermenters. The result of phenotypic analysis of the strains generated is shown in Supplementary Figure S3.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Acetone and isopropanol producing C. acetobutylicum strain; bearing bgaR-P bgaL ::tcdR (lactose inducible tcdR) at pyrE locus, ctfA/B and adc (encoding CoA transferase and acetoacetate decarboxylase) at purD locus and sadh (encoding a secondary alcohol, dehydrogenase, sADH) at pheA locus. The position of the four loci on the 4.0 Gb C. acetobutylicum chromosome is shown. The bgaR gene encodes the BgaR response regulator which, following binding of lactose brings about transcription of the tcdR gene. The TcdR sigma factor produced promoters binding of RNA polymerase (RNP) to the P tcdB promoter upstream of sadh at the pheA locus and ctfA/B:adc at the purD locus resulting in production of isopropanol and acetone, respectively.

3.5 Acetone and isopropanol-butanol-ethanol (IBE) production

To investigate the impact of the integrated acetone operon in C. acetobutylicum, the solvent profile of strain 824BO2 was analysed. Up to 9.31 ± 0.30 g/L acetone was produced with a 10 mM lactose induction while the wild type C. acetobutylicum 824 produced only 5.48 ± 0.03 g/L (Table 2). An increase in ethanol (2.43 ± 0.33 g/L) (Figure 5) compared to wild type (2.20 ± 0.01 g/L) was also observed while butanol was higher in the WT (15.50 ± 0.25 g/L) than in 824BO2 (12.23 ± 0.20 g/L). At the same time, strain 824BO2 exhibited a decrease in acid production.

TABLE 2.

Summary of the IBE production achieved here and in comparable studies.

Study IPA (g/L) BuOH (g/L) EtOH (g/L) IBE (g/L) Gene Location b Strain a IBE gene promoters pH control Comment
sadh ctfA/B adc
This study 4.40 13.49 3.09 19.80 Chr ATCC 824 PtcdB PtcdB PtcdB Yes tcdR integrated downstream of pyrE under control of Pbgl , ctfA/B-adc and sadh integrated downstream of purD and pheA, respectively, under control of PtcdB
bgaR::tcdR
integrant
Banker et al. (2015) 2.51 10.78 2.0 15.30 Chr DSM 792 Padc native native Yes sadh under Padc promoter integrated in Chr, ctfA/B-adc genes on the pSOL megaplasmid
wildtype
Wang et al. (2018) 6.62 10.51 1.24 17.77 pIMP1 XY16 Pptb native native Yes sadh expressed from Pptb on multicopy plasmid, ctfA/B-adc on megaplasmid. Regulation of intracellular NAD(P)H levels by CaCO3.
(pIM13) wildtype
Dusseaux et al. (2013) 4.22 13.8 0.46 18.48 pCLF942 ATCC 824 Pptb Pptb Pptb Yes Δbuk made in a Δcac15Δupp mutant. ctfA/B-sadh-adc expressed from Pptb on a multicopy plasmid.
(pIM13) Δbuk
Dusseaux et al. (2013) 4.75 14.63 1.01 20.40 pCLF952 ATCC 824 Δbuk Pthl Pthl Pthl Yes Δbuk made in a Δcac15Δupp mutant. ctfA/B-sadh-adc expressed from Pthl on a multicopy plasmid.
(pIM13)
Jang et al. (2013) 3.60 14.80 9.5 27.90 pIPA100 ATCC 824 (BKM19) Pthl native native Yes BKM19 (hyper-ABE producer) buk-mutant carrying sadh-hydG expressed from Pthl on multicopy plasmid.
(pIM13)
Dai et al. (2012) 7.60 15.00 1.28 23.88 pIMP1 DSM 1731
(Rh8)
Pthl native native Yes Rh8 (butanol tolerant mutant) carries P thl -sadh on a pIMP1 and ctfA/B-adc on the pSMBa megaplasmid.
(pIM13)
Collas et al. (2012) 8.80 13.70 1.5 24.00 pFC007 ATCC 824 Pthl Pthl Pthl No harbouring P thl -sadh-ctfA/B-adc genes expressed from P thl on multicopy plasmid based on pAMβl
(pAMβl) wildtype
Lee et al. (2012) 5.10 8.00 0.80 13.90 pIPA3 ATCC 824 Padc Padc Padc No ctfA/B-adc-sadh under control of Padc promoter on multicopy plasmid—batch fermentation in flasks.
(pIM13) wildtype
Lee et al. (2012) 6.10 10.20 0.80 17.10 pIPA3 ATCC 824 Padc Padc Padc Yes ctfA/B-adc-sadh under control of Padc promoter on multicopy plasmid—in a fermentator.
(pIM13) wildtype
Lee et al. (2012) 4.40 14.10 1.90 20.40 pIPA3 ATCC 824 Padc Padc Padc Yes As above but undertaken in a buk- mutant as opposed to the wildtype.
(pIM13) buk -
a

All strains described in Table 2 are C. acetobutylicum carrying the megaplasmid pSOL, or equivalent.

b

Chr indicates chromosome.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Lactose induced acetone production. C. acetobutylicum strain 824BO2 and the wild type ATCC 824 control were grown in CGM under pH-control (≥5.0). Cultures were induced with lactose at 6 h. Growth and metabolic profiles, with and without 10 mM lactose induction, are shown. Experiments were carried out in triplicate and time points are given as average values.

Having shown that up to 41% more acetone was produced by the integrated acetone operon in strain 824BO2, the production of IBE from 824BO3, containing the sadh gene was investigated. Fermentation was carried out in bioreactors with pH maintained at ≥ 5.0. Strain 824BO3 had a longer lag phase and complete glucose consumption was observed at 72 h compared with the WT which had completely used up glucose by 24 h. With induction, up to 4.4 g/L isopropanol was produced at 72 h (Figure 6) with residual acetone of 0.32 ± 0.06 g/L. As expected, less acetone was produced than by the WT due to its conversion to isopropanol by the sADH. As expected, in the absence of lactose induction, little or no isopropanol (0.39 ± 0.00 g/L) production was observed.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Lactose induced isopropanol production. C. acetobutylicum strain 824BO3 was cultivated under pH-control (≥5.0) CGM and induced with lactose at 6 h. Growth and metabolic profiles, with and without 10 mM lactose induction, are shown. Experiments were carried out in triplicate and time points are given as average values.

Similar to strain 824BO2, more ethanol (3.09 ± 0.11 g/L) and less butanol (12.30 ± 1.31 g/L) was produced compared with the WT which made 2.20 ± 0.01 g/L and 15.50 ± 0.25 g/L ethanol and butanol, respectively. Strain 824BO3 also produced less acids than the WT (Figure 5). The non-induced 824BO3 strain showed incomplete glucose utilization, accumulation of residual acids and a decrease in solvent concentration. Table 2 summarises the IBE production in C. acetobutylicum from previous researchers using plasmid borne as well as chromosomally integrated heterologous genes.

4 Discussion

In the current study we used an inducible orthogonal system to control the disparately located genes responsible for acetone and isopropanol production. In the strain engineered for just acetone production, 824BO2, the decrease in acid production compared to the WT was consistent with the fact that with the onset of solventogenesis, acetate and butyrate are re-assimilated and metabolized concomitantly with glucose. Acid uptake is via the acetoacetyl-CoA:acyl-CoA transferaseA/B (ctfA/B) with acetoacetyl-CoA serving as the CoA donor (Lütke-Eversloh and Bahl, 2011) and this re-assimilation has been directly coupled with the formation of acetone (Jones and Woods, 1986).

Acetone is formed in two steps from acetoacetyl-CoA; CoA is first removed by CtfA/B yielding acetoacetate which is subsequently decarboxylated by ADC to form acetone. The increase in ethanol could be from the additional acetyl-CoA made available from the uptake of acetate as a consequence of the overexpression of the integrated ctfA/B genes. A similar increase in total solvents and decrease in residual carboxylic acids in C. acetobutylicum has previously been reported following overexpression of the genes of the acetone operon (Mermelstein and Papoutsakis, 1993; Jang et al., 2012). The metabolic profile of 824BO2 was strongly influenced by the lactose induced overexpression of the acetone operon integrated in the genome, as was evident from the profile of the uninduced cultures (Figure 5). In this instance, the consumption of glucose was incomplete, more acid was accumulated and solvent yields were lower.

Converting acetone to isopropanol results in a mixture of isopropanol, butanol and ethanol, commonly referred to as IBE. This mix is more attractive for fuel applications than ABE as it can be used directly (Collas et al., 2012; Li et al., 2019). Indeed, its use as a fuel additive in the production of gasoline or diesel oil has already been reported (Peralta-Yahya and Keasling, 2010; Li et al., 2019). Here, the total IBE produced by strain 824BO3 from 80 g/L glucose was 19.8 g/L. In comparison with Clostridium beijerinckii, a natural producer of IBE, these yields are higher. In 2000, Shaheen and co-workers (Shaheen et al., 2000) undertook some comparative fermentations of industrial clostridial strains and demonstrated that C. beijerinckii NRRL B592 produced 16.2 g/L total solvents from maize mash (80 g/L). Survase et al. (2011) reported a batch production of 5.9 g/L IBE (3.7 g/L butanol and 2.2 g/L isopropanol) while continuous fermentation yielded 7.51 g/L. In a more recent study, C. beijerinckii BGS1 was reported to produce 13.6 g/L IBE (10.2 g/L butanol and 3.4 g/L isopropanol) with negligible ethanol from 60 g/L glucose (Zhang et al., 2018).

Previously described engineering of C. acetobutylicum for IBE production have largely relied on the use of high copy number autonomous plasmids requiring antibiotic maintenance. However, while the incorporation of operons into autonomous plasmids has the advantage of higher copy number, guaranteeing higher yields of products, the plasmids are invariably segregationally unstable and may be lost from the population. Reduced productivity due to plasmid loss constitutes a major industrial problem (Friehs, 2004; Peubez et al., 2010; Seiben et al., 2016; Fedorec et al., 2019). Although this can be avoided by endowing the plasmid antibiotic resistance genes and including the requisite antibiotic in the media, such measures are unwise if the spread of antimicrobial resistance and the associated environmental and health problems (Hagg et al., 2004) are to be avoided. Moreover, the addition of antibiotics to cultures is both expensive and undesirable (Kroll et al., 2010). Heterologous genes can be stabilized by chromosomal integration (Kroll et al., 2010).

Integration of gene sets into the chromosome overcomes these drawbacks, producing strains that are segregationally stable and more suitable for industrial applications. Banker et al. (2015), for instance integrated the sadh gene under the control of the P adc promoter into the chromosome of C. acetobutylicum using allelic exchange. The engineered strain was able to produce 2.51 g/L isopropanol and 18 g/L IBE, representing the highest reported yield of isopropanol and IBE from a chromosomally engineered Clostridium. In the present study the use of the lactose inducible TcdR system, allowed this benchmark to be exceeded, achieving 4.4 g/L isopropanol and 19.8 g/L IBE. These levels were reached through the addition of high concentrations of the lactose inducer, which lead to elevated production of the TcdR sigma factor. Whilst the use of such an inducible system is probably not applicable on an industrial scale, the outcome has demonstrated both the feasibility of controlling the expression of chromosomally disparate gene sets with the same orthogonal sigma factor and given an indication of the level of expression required.

It was noticeable that 824BO2/3 produced slightly reduced levels of solvents under non-induced conditions. As the parental auxotrophic mutants were unaffected in solvent production (data not shown), the likely cause of this phenotype was the presence of tcdR in the pyrE locus. Although the C.acetobutylicum genome carries no sequences that closely resemble the tcdA or tcdB promoters, non-specific binding of the TcdR to the chromosome or pSOL megaplasmid that effect the expression of genes involved in solvent production cannot be ruled out. However, whatever the basis of the any hypothetical interaction(s), it did not prevent the attainment of high levels of solvents following lactose-induced overproduction of TcdR.

The mutational tool used to create the suite of auxotrophic mutants used here provides a simple and reliable route to mutant acquisition for strategies reliant on the counter-selection markers codA or pyrE (Minton et al., 2016). This is because, although two distinct steps are involved, positive selection of the desired outcome is possible at both stages. Thus, the double crossover mutant is directly selected in the first step and the clean, in-frame deletion mutant at the subsequent second step. In contrast, previously developed methods first select single crossover integrants before selecting clonal populations in which an excision event has occurred by plating on media containing the counter-selection agent. At this second stage, both wildtype ‘revertants’ and double cross-over mutants are present, necessitating the use of an additional screen (PCR) to identify the in-frame deletion mutant clones. While the method requires the starting strain to be a pyrE mutant, these are relatively easily generated using ACE or a RAM-less version of the ClosTron (Minton et al., 2016).

Although in recent years, CRISPR/Cas9 systems have largely replaced the use of counter-selection markers for mutant generation, they are not without problems. Cas9 has off-target effects, distributed license agreements for its use are expensive and the long-lasting patent battle between the two major players has caused uncertainty with potential licensees. In contrast, for commercially orientated studies, the system described here is unfettered by licensing issues.

5 Conclusion

A system has been devised that allows the introduction of different components of a metabolic pathway at distinct loci around the C. acetobutylicum chromosome, based on the creation of multiple auxotrophic mutant alleles using a novel procedure that facilitates the direct selection of deletion mutants. Components can be rapidly integrated using allele-coupled exchange (ACE) and conveniently selected on the basis of the restoration of prototrophy. Our experiments demonstrate that the orthogonal sigma factor TcdR, following integration of its encoding gene at one locus, can be used to simultaneously control different gene sets integrated at distant chromosomal loci. As these gene sets have disparate locations, recombination between the identical promoters is not an issue as may be the case when tandemly arranged. By placing the production of TcdR under the control of the lactose inducible BgaR::P bgaL promoter system we established that catP expression from the P tcdB promoter when induced with 1–10 mM lactose was over 10-fold higher than if catP was directly under the control of BgaR::P bgaL . The system was capable of producing 4.4 g/L isopropanol and 19.8 g/L IBE.

Acknowledgments

We thank David Tooth and Matthew Abbott for assistance with HPLC–UV analysis, and all members of SBRC who helped to carry out this research.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (grant numbers BB/L013940/1and BB/N022718/1), the IB Catalyst grant MAXIBIO, and through the award to B.BO of a studentship by the Petroleum Technology Development Fund, Nigeria (PTDF/ED/PHD/BBO/763/15).

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

NM conceptualized the study. BO, HW, JB, KG, MY, and YZ designed and carried out the experiments. Funding acquisition was by BO and NM. The manuscript was drafted by BO and revised by NM. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1218099/full#supplementary-material

References

  1. An W., Chin J. W. (2011). Chapter five - orthogonal gene expression in Escherichia coli . Meth Enzymol. 497, 115–134. 10.1016/B978-0-12-385075-1.00005-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. An W., Chin J. W. (2009). Synthesis of orthogonal transcription-translation networks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc. U. S. A. 106, 8477–8482. 10.1073/pnas.0900267106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baer S. H., Blaschek H. P., Smith T. L. (1987). Effect of butanol challenge and temperature on lipid composition and membrane fluidity of butanol-tolerant Clostridium acetobutylicum . Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53, 2854–2861. 10.1128/aem.53.12.2854-2861.1987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bankar S. B., Jurgens G., Survase S. A., Ojamo H., Granström T. (2015). Genetic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum to enhance isopropanol–butanol–ethanol production with an integrated DNA-technology approach. Renew. Energy 83, 1076–1083. 10.1016/j.renene.2015.05.052 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bloor A. E., Cranenburgh R. M. (2006). An efficient method of selectable marker gene excision by Xer recombination for gene replacement in bacterial chromosomes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72 (4), 2520–2525. 10.1128/aem.72.4.2520-2525.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carnoy C., Roten C-A. (2009). The dif/xer recombination systems in proteobacteria. PLoS One 4 (9), e6531. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cartman S. T., Kelly M. L., Heeg D., Heap J. T., Minton N. P. (2012). Precise manipulation of the Clostridium difficile chromosome reveals a lack of association between the tcdC genotype and toxin production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78 (13), 4683– 4690. 10.1128/AEM.00249-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Collas F., Kuit W., Clement B., Marchal R., Lopez-Contreras A. M., Monot F. (2012). Simultaneous production of isopropanol, butanol, ethanol and 2,3-butanediol by Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 engineered strains. Amb. Express 2, 45. 10.1186/2191-0855-2-45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Costello A., Badran A. H. (2021). Synthetic biological circuits within an orthogonal central dogma. Trends Biotechnol. 39 (1), 59–71. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dai Z., Dong H., Zhu Y., Zhang Y., Li Y., Ma Y. (2012). Introducing a single secondary alcohol dehydrogenase into butanol-tolerant Clostridium acetobutylicum Rh8 switches ABE fermentation to high level IBE fermentation. Biotechnol. Biofuels 5, 44. 10.1186/1754-6834-5-44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dupuy B., Raffestin S., Matamouros S., Mani N., Popoff M. R., Sonenshein A. L. (2006). Regulation of toxin and bacteriocin gene expression in Clostridium by interchangeable RNA polymerase sigma factors. Mol. Microbiol. 60, 1044–1057. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05159.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dusseaux S., Croux C., Soucaille P., Meynial-Salles I. (2013). Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 for the high-yield production of a biofuel composed of an isopropanol/butanol/ethanol mixture. Metab. Eng. 18, 1–8. 10.1016/j.ymben.2013.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ehsaan M., Kuit W., Zhang Y., Cartman S. T., Heap J. T., Winzer K., et al. (2016). Mutant generation by allelic exchange and genome resequencing of the biobutanol organism Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. Biotechnol. Biofuels 9, 4. 10.1186/s13068-015-0410-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fedorec A., Ozdemir T., Doshi A., Ho Y. K., Rosa L., Rutter J., et al. (2019). Two new plasmid post-segregational killing mechanisms for the implementation of synthetic gene networks in Escherichia coli . IScience 14, 323–334. 10.1016/j.isci.2019.03.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Friehs K. (2004). Plasmid copy number and plasmid stability. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 86, 47–82. 10.1007/b12440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hagg P., De Pohl J. W., Abdulkarim F., Isaksson L. A. (2004). A host/plasmid system that is not dependent on antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes for stable plasmid maintenance in Escherichia coli . Escherichia Coli. J. Biotechnol. 111, 17–30. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hartman A. H., Liu H., Melville S. B. (2011). Construction and characterization of a lactose-inducible promoter system for controlled gene expression in Clostridium perfringens . Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77 (2), 471–478. 10.1128/aem.01536-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hartmanis M. G., Gatenbeck S. (1984). Intermediary metabolism in Clostridium acetobutylicum: Levels of enzymes involved in the formation of acetate and butyrate. App Environ. Microbiol. 47, 1277–1283. 10.1128/aem.47.6.1277-1283.1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Heap J. T., Ehsaan M., Cooksley C. M., Ng Y. K., Cartman S. T., Winzer K., et al. (2012). Integration of DNA into bacterial chromosomes from plasmids without a counter-selection marker. Nucl. Acids Res. 40, e59. 10.1093/nar/gkr1321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heap J. T., Pennington O. J., Cartman S. T., Carter G. P., Minton N. P. (2007). The ClosTron: A universal gene knock-out system for the genus Clostridium. Clostridium. J. Microbiol. Methods 70, 452–464. 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heap J. T., Pennington O. J., Cartman S. T., Minton N. P. (2009). A modular system for Clostridium shuttle plasmids. J. Microbiol. Methods 78, 79–85. 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Herman N. A., Kim S. J., Li J. S., Cai W., Koshino H., Zhang W. (2017). The industrial anaerobe Clostridium acetobutylicum uses polyketides to regulate cellular differentiation. Nat. Commun. 8, 1514. 10.1038/s41467-017-01809-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jang Y. S., Lee J. Y., Lee J., Park J. H., Im J. A., Eom M. H., et al. (2012). Enhanced butanol production obtained by reinforcing the direct butanol-forming route in. Clostridium acetobutylicum mBio 3 (5), 003144–e412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jang Y. S., Malaviya A., Lee J., Im J. A., Lee S. Y., Lee J., et al. (2013). Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum for the enhanced production of isopropanol-butanol-ethanol fuel mixture. Biotechnol. Prog. 29, 1083–1088. 10.1002/btpr.1733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jones D. T., Woods D. R. (1986). Acetone-butanol fermentation revisited. Microbiol. Rev. 50, 484–524. 10.1128/mr.50.4.484-524.1986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kroll J., Klinter S., Schneider C., Voss I., Steinbüchel A. (2010). Plasmid addiction systems: Perspectives and applications in biotechnology: Plasmid addiction systems. Microb. Biotechnol. 3, 634–657. 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00170.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee J., Jang Y. S., Choi S. J., Im J. A., Song H., Cho J. H., et al. (2012). Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 for isopropanol-butanol-ethanol fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 1416–1423. 10.1128/aem.06382-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li G., Lee T. H., Liu Z., Lee C. F., Zhang C. (2019). Effects of injection strategies on combustion and emission characteristics of a common-rail diesel engine fueled with Isopropanol butanol-ethanol and diesel blends. Ren. Ener 130, 677–686. 10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.099 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lütke-Eversloh T., Bahl H. (2011). Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum: Recent advances to improve butanol production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22, 634–647. 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mermelstein L. D., Papoutsakis E. T. (1993). In vivo methylation in Escherichia coli by the Bacillus subtilis phage phi 3T I methyltransferase to protect plasmids from restriction upon transformation of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 1077–1081. 10.1128/aem.59.4.1077-1081.1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mermelstein L. D., Welker N. E., Bennett G. N., Papoutsakis E. T. (1992). Expression of cloned homologous fermentative genes in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. Biotechnology 10, 190–195. 10.1038/nbt0292-190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Minton N. P., Ehsaan M., Humphreys C. M., Little G. T., Baker J., Henstra A. M., et al. (2016). A roadmap for gene system development in Clostridium. Clostridium. Anaerobe 41, 104–112. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.05.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nelms J., Edwards R. M., Warwick J., Fotheringham I. (1992). Novel mutations in the pheA gene of Escherichia coli K-12 which result in highly feedback inhibition-resistant variants of chorismate mutase/prephenate dehydratase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 2592–2598. 10.1128/aem.58.8.2592-2598.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ng Y. K., Ehsaan M., Philip S., Collery M. M., Janoir C., Collignon A., et al. (2013). Expanding the repertoire of gene tools for precise manipulation of the Clostridium difficile genome: Allelic exchange using pyrE alleles. PLoS One 8 (2), e56051. 10.1371/journal.pone.0056051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nguyen N. P. T., Raynaud C., Meynial-Salles I., Soucaille P. (2018). Reviving the Weizmann process for commercialn-butanol production. Nat. Commun. 9, 3682. 10.1038/s41467-018-05661-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Peralta-Yahya P. P., Keasling J. D. (2010). Advanced biofuel production in microbes. Biotechnol. J. 5, 147–162. 10.1002/biot.200900220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Peubez I., Chaudet N., Mignon C., Hild G., Husson S., Courtois V., et al. (2010). Antibiotic-free selection in E. coli: New considerations for optimal design and improved production. Microb. Cell. Fact. 9, 65. 10.1186/1475-2859-9-65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Reimers J. M., Schmidt K. H., Longacre A., Reschke D. K., Wright B. E. (2004). Increased transcription rates correlate with increased reversion rates in leuB and argH Escherichia coli auxotrophs. Microbiology 150, 1457–1466. 10.1099/mic.0.26954-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sambrook J., Fritsch E. F., Maniatis T. (1989). Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual, cold spring harbor. NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. [Google Scholar]
  40. Shaheen R., Shirley M., Jones D. T. (2000). Comparative fermentation studies of industrial strains belonging to four species of solvent-producing clostridia. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2, 115–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shaw W. V. (1975). Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase from chloramphenicol-resistant bacteria. Methods Enzymol. 43, 737–755. 10.1016/0076-6879(75)43141-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sieben M., Steinhorn G., Müller C., Fuchs S., Ann Chin L., Regestein L., et al. (2016). Testing plasmid stability of Escherichia coli using the continuously operated shaken bioreactor system. Biotechnol. Prog. 32, 1418–1425. 10.1002/btpr.2341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Survase S. A., Jurgens G., Heiningen A., Granström T. (2011). Continuous production of isopropanol and butanol using Clostridium beijerinckii DSM 6423. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91, 1305–1313. 10.1007/s00253-011-3322-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Truong Q. L., Cho Y., Barate A. K., Kim S., Watarai M., Hahn T. W. (2015). Mutation of purD and purF genes further attenuates Brucella abortus strain RB51. Microb. Pathog. 79, 1–7. 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang C., Xin F., Kong X., Zhao J., Dong W., Zhang W., et al. (2018). Enhanced isopropanol-butanol-ethanol mixture production through manipulation of intracellular NAD(P)H level in the recombinant Clostridium acetobutylicum XY16. Biotechnol. Biofuels 11, 12. 10.1186/s13068-018-1024-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Woods C., HumphreysTomi-Andrino C. M. C., HenstraKöpke A. M. M., Simpson S. D., Winzer K. (2022). Required gene set for autotrophic growth of Clostridium autoethanogenum . Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 88, 024799–e2521. 10.1128/aem.02479-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Xin X., Cheng C., Du G., Chen L., Xue C. (2020). Metabolic engineering of histidine kinases in Clostridium beijerinckii for enhanced butanol production. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 214. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang C., Li T., He J. (2018). Characterization and genome analysis of a butanol–isopropanol- producing Clostridium beijerinckii strain BGS1. Biotechnol. Biofuels 11, 280. 10.1186/s13068-018-1274-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang Y., Grosse-Honebrink A., Minton N. P. (2015). A universal mariner transposon system for forward genetic studies in the genus Clostridium . PLoS One 10, e0122411. 10.1371/journal.pone.0122411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES