Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that affects apocrine gland-bearing skin. The management of HS with biologics has expanded significantly over the past few years. Certolizumab pegol is a pegylated (polyethylene glycol) antigen-binding fragment of a recombinant humanized anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody, which is approved for psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and Crohn’s disease. In recent years many reports have been merging on the use of certolizumab in treating hidradenitis suppurativa. The electronic database MEDLINE was searched through PubMed in February 2022 using the following search terms: Certolizumab “[All Fields] OR” certolizumab pegol”[All Fields] AND “Hidradenitis suppurativa”[ All Fields]. The search revealed that certolizumab was used in 6 case reports to treat HS with a total of 7 patients. We can conclude that there are few cases in the literature discussing the use of certolizumab in HS, all of which, show a good and promising response with no reported side effects.
Key words: hidradenitis suppurativa, certolizumab, review
Introduction
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the terminal hair follicles and apocrine glands. It is characterized by the presence of inflammatory nodules that can progress to abscesses and fistulas in the apocrine gland-bearing skin, classically in armpits, groin, and other intertriginous areas.1 The prevalence is estimated to be 0.40%,2 with peak age between 30 and 40 years, and an incidence of 3:1 in females.1,2 Patients with HS suffer a significant reduction in quality of life with an increased risk of depression, anxiety, sexual dysfunction, and low self-esteem.1,3 The management of HS has expanded significantly over the past few years, and this includes lifestyle changes, topical therapies, systemic therapies, and surgical therapies. 4 Biologics are rapidly emerging as a therapeutic modality used in multiple inflammatory conditions including HS. Adalimumab is currently the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for moderate-tosevere HS.5 The pathogenesis of HS includes the expression of many pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-12, IL- 24, IL-23, IL-17, IL-1 and blockade of these cytokines is a mainstay of treatment in HS.1,5 Certolizumab is a humanized antigenbinding fragment of a monoclonal antibody which binds to TNF- α, and it is approved only for moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.6 Very little is known about certolizumab pegol in HS; however, in recent years many reports have been merging on the use of Certolizumab in treating HS, especially in the pregnant patients.
Materials and Methods
The electronic database MEDLINE was searched through PubMed in February 2022 using the following search terms: Certolizumab “[All Fields] OR “ certolizumab pegol”[All Fields] AND “ Hidradenitis suppurativa”[All Fields]. The search revealed that certolizumab was used in 6 case reports to treat HS with a total of 7 patients.7-12
Results
Our search revealed that certolizumab was used in 6 case reports to treat HS with a total of 7 patients. Herein, we summarize the findings in the literature in order from most recent to oldest.
The first study was done by Repetto et al. in 2021,7 and reported two cases of HS with bilateral axillary and inguinal involvement, and concomitant psoriasis. They had been treated with adalimumab 40 mg weekly for approximately 2 years with only partial improvement. Both women reported planning to get pregnant during treatment. They were shifted to certolizumab pegol (CZP) 200 mg administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 3 months and they showed improvement in the international hidradenitis suppurativa severity score system (IHS4) from 8 and 11 to 1 and 3, respectively with no reported side effects.7
In 2021, Esme et al. reported the case of a 43-year-old male with bilateral axillary, intergluteal sulcus, and gluteal HS with Hurley stage 3.8 Different treatment options including numerous topical and systemic antibiotics, retinoids, adalimumab, secukinumab, methotrexate with poor improvement were used. The patient was started on CZP 400 mg every other week. The hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) was achieved in the 12th week, 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) and dermatological life quality index (DLQI) scores regressed from 171 to 105, 9/10 to 3/10, and 27 to 19 after 3 months with certolizumab pegol treatment.8
Tampouratzi et al., in 2020, reported the case of a 27-year-old woman with comorbid psoriasis and HS on the axillae with Hurley stage 2 and a 10 IHS4 score. Treatments with topical corticosteroids and methotrexate for one year were not effective and treatment with apremilast for 8 months did not offer clinical improvement in both diseases. She was started on CZP with an initial dose of 400mg, followed by 400 mg every 2 weeks. Treatment with CZP significantly improved psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in week 8 and HS in week 12. She continued treatment for 9 months. The IHS4 score done after, and it significantly dropped to 1.9
Holm et al., in 2020, reported the case of a 59-year-old man with Hurley stage 3. He showed insufficient response to topical azelaic acid and clindamycin, systemic lymecycline, rifampicin and clindamycin, acitretin, dapsone, adalimumab, ustekinumab, etanercept, ixekizumab, secukinumab, infliximab. The patient’s hidradenitis suppurativa score (HSS) was 133, DLQI score was 25 and overall disease bother and overall disease pain score (VAS) were both 10 out of 10. Only adalimumab showed some effect but was discontinued due to urosepsis. He started certolizumab pegol 400 mg every other week then next month increased to 200 mg every week for 11 months. He reported an HSS score of 75, DLQI of 11, VAS pain of 10, and VAS disease bother score of 5.10
Wohlmuth-Wieser et al., in 2020,11 reported a case of 34 Y old female diagnosed with HS involving the groin and buttocks with Hurley Stage III and IHS4 score of 44. She was on clindamycin, rifampin, and adalimumab. The treatment was well-tolerated and led to a significant improvement in her symptoms. However, she got pregnant, and the patient decided to stop adalimumab at 6 weeks of gestation. At 19 weeks of gestation, she experienced a flare of her disease. The patient was started on CZP 400 mg subcutaneous injections (SC) every 2 weeks. At the 8-week followup, she achieved an HiSCR of 50. However, at the following visit the patient presented with worsening pain and one new abscess. The dose was therefore increased to 400 mg SC weekly at 32 weeks of gestation. The medication was well-tolerated without any side effects. At the last follow-up before delivery, symptoms had significantly improved. Her IHS4 score drop to 9.11
Abad et al., in 2019,12 reported the case of a 53-year-old male with HS in the axillary and groin area. He was treated with adalimumab and infliximab with no improvement. He was started on certolizumab 400 mg as 2 SC of 200 mg each on weeks 0, 2, and 4. Later, the maintenance dose is 400 mg every 4 weeks. After 3 months all the lesions resolved completely. He continued for more than 7 months: a total of 10 months duration with no subjective or laboratory adverse reactions.12 Summary of the clinical data seen in Table 1.7-12
Table 1.
Study | Number of patients | Gender | Age | Treated before and improvement the treatment | Score before | Treatment with CZP and dosage | Score after the treatment | Any reported side effect |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Repetto et al.1 | 2 | Female | NA | Adalimumab Partial improvement | Patient 1: (IHS4 score 8) Patient 2: (IHS4 score : 11) | 200 mg every 2 weeks for 3 months. | Patient 1: (IHS4 score 3) Patient 2: (IHS4 score 2) HiSCR was achieved for both | No reported side effects |
Esme et al.s | 1 | Male | 43 | Adalimumab, secukinuma, and methotrexate Poor improvement | NA | 400 mg every 2 weeks for 3 months. | HiSCR was achieved | No reported side effects |
Tampouxatzi et al9 | 1 | Female | 27 | Methotrexate and apremilast No improvement | IHS4 score 10 | 400 mg every 2 weeks for 9 months. | IHS4 score 1 | No reported side effects |
Holm et al.10 | 1 | Male | 59 | Systemic lymecycline, rifampicin, clindamycin, acitretin, dapsone, adalimumab, ustekinumab, etanercept, ixekizumab, secukinumab, and infliximab Partial improvement on only adalimumab | HSS score 133 | 400 mg every other week then next month increased to 200 mg every week for 11 months. | HSS score 75 | No reported side effects |
Wohlmuth-Wieser et al." | 1 | Female | 34 | Clindamycin, rifampin, and adalimumab Good improvement | IHS4 score: 44 | 400 mg every 2 weeks and then increased to 400 mg weekly | IHS4 score 9 | No reported side effects |
Abad et al.n | 1 | Male | 53 | Adalimumab and infliximab No improvement | NA | 400 mg as 2 SC of 200 mg each on weeks 0, 2,and 4. Later, the maintenance dose of 400 mg every 4 weeks. For 10 months. | NA | No reported side effects |
CZP, certolizumab pegol; SC, subcutaneous injection; NA, not applicable; IHS4, international hidradenitis suppurativa severity score system; HiSCR, hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response; HSS, hidradenitis suppurativa score.
Conclusions
In conclusion, to this date certolizumab pegol is FDAapproved for the treatment of psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and Crohn’s disease, but not for HS. There are few cases in the literature discussing the use of certolizumab in HS, all of which, show a good and promising response with no reported side effects. Certolizumab was used as an alternative to the approved medications in cases of failure to therapy or contraindication (e.g., pregnancy). However, the efficacy and safety of certolizumab in treating HS patients are still not well-established, and larger trials are needed.
Funding Statement
Funding: none.
References
- 1.Nguyen TV, Damiani G, Orenstein LA, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa: an update on epidemiology, phenotypes, diagnosis, pathogenesis, comorbidities and quality of life. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021;35:50-61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jfri A, Nassim D, O’Brien E, et al. Prevalence of Hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. JAMA Dermatol 2021;157:924-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Capasso G, Fabbrocini G, Marasca C. Disfiguring hidradenitis suppurativa of the face. Skin Appendage Disord 2022;8:70-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Anduquia-Garay F, Rodríguez-Gutiérrez MM, Poveda- Castillo IT, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa: basic considerations for its approach: a narrative review. Ann Med Surg 2021;68:102679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Flood KS, Porter ML, Kimball AB. Biologic treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa. Am J Clin Dermatol 2019;20:625-38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Collier EK, Seivright JR, Shi VY, Hsiao JL. Pregnancy and breastfeeding in hidradenitis suppurativa: a review of medication safety. Dermatol Ther 2021;34:e14674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Repetto F, Burzi L, Ramondetta A, et al. Certolizumab pegol and its role in pregnancy-age hidradenitis suppurativa. Int J Dermatol 2022;61:e182-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Esme P, Akoglu G, Caliskan E. Rapid response to certolizumab pegol in hidradenitis suppurativa: a case report. Skin Appendage Disord 2021;7:58-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tampouratzi E, Kanni T, Katsantonis J, Douvali T. Case report: treating a co-existence of hidradenitis suppurativa and psoriasis with different therapeutic approaches. F1000Res 2019;8:2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Holm JG, Jørgensen AH, Yao Y, Thomsen SF. Certolizumab pegol for hidradenitis suppurativa: case report and literature review. Dermatol Ther 2020; 33:e14494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wohlmuth-Wieser I, Alhusayen R. Treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa with certolizumab pegol during pregnancy. Int J Dermatol 2021;60:e140-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Abad JS. A case report of hidradenitis suppurativa treated with certolizumab. JAAD 2019;81. [Google Scholar]