Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2023 Mar 15;145(12):6871–6879. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c00123

A Rationally Designed Complex Replenishes the Transferrin Iron Pool Directly and With High Specificity

Artur Sargun 1, Allison L Fisher 2, Anna S Wolock 1, Sydney Phillips 2, Mozhdeh Sojoodi 3, Soumya Khanna 2, Jodie L Babitt 2, Eric M Gale 1,*
PMCID: PMC10312995  NIHMSID: NIHMS1896100  PMID: 36920018

Abstract

Many forms of anemia are caused or complicated by pathologic restriction of iron (Fe). Chronic inflammation and certain genetic mutations decrease the activity of ferroportin, the only Fe-exporter protein, so that endogenously recycled or nutritionally absorbed Fe cannot be exported to the extracellular Fe carrier protein transferrin for delivery to the bone marrow. Diminished ferroportin activity renders anemia correction challenging, as Fe administered intravenously or through nutritional supplementation is trafficked through the ferroportin-transferrin axis. Utilizing judicious application of coordination chemistry principles, we designed an Fe complex (Fe-BBG) with solutions thermodynamics and Fe dissociation kinetics optimized to replenish the transferrin-Fe pool rapidly, directly, and with precision. Fe-BBG is unreactive under conditions designed to force redox cycling and production of reactive oxygen species. The BBG ligand has low affinity for divalent metal ions and does not compete for binding of other endogenously present ions including Cu and Zn. Treatment with Fe-BBG confers anemia correction in a mouse model of iron-refractory iron-deficiency anemia. Repeat exposure to Fe-BBG did not cause adverse clinical chemistry changes or trigger expression of genes related to oxidative stress or inflammation. Fe-BBG represents the first entry in a promising new class of transferrin-targeted Fe replacement drugs.

INTRODUCTION.

Many anemias, including anemia of inflammation and iron refractory iron deficiency anemia (IRIDA) are driven partially or entirely by pathologic Fe restriction.13 In these conditions, chronic immune activation or genetic mutations upregulate expression of the Fe regulator hormone hepcidin, which inhibits activity of the only known Fe-exporter protein ferroportin.46 Hepcidin excess thus inhibits Fe liberated by hemoglobin recycling in macrophages, dietary Fe absorbed through duodenal enterocytes, and other stored Fe from export to the extracellular Fe carrier protein transferrin.7 Hepcidin excess/ ferroportin deficiency also limits the efficacy of Fe replacement therapy, as nearly all intravenous (i.v.) formulations are comprised of Fe-carbohydrate or Fe-oxide nanoparticles, which are absorbed and metabolized in macrophages, and thus rely on ferroportin for Fe export.711 Nutritional Fe supplementation suffers the same limitation and can also be complicated by gastrointestinal intolerance.12

There are no clinically available treatments that target the interaction between hepcidin and ferroportin.1315 Fe mobilization may be improved using erythropoiesis stimulation agents (ESAs), which indirectly lower hepcidin expression by enhancing erythropoiesis.16 However, additional Fe supplementation is needed by many patients receiving ESAs. Moreover, ESAs are associated with cardiovascular toxicity, increased risk for thromboembolic events, and malignancy.1721 For these reasons, ESAs carry a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) boxed warning advising of increased risk of death and other serious adverse events.

Hypoxia inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are a new class of drug to stimulate endogenous erythropoietin production.22 HIF-PHIs may also increase intestinal Fe absorption and transport by promoting expression of Fe transport proteins.16, 23 However, it has not been established that HIF-PHIs improve Fe bioavailability or confer a safety advantage over ESAs in randomized controls trials, and one HIF-PHI failed to meet non-inferiority safety endpoints in global phase 3 clinical trials.24 The first HIF-PHI agents submitted to the FDA for marketing authorization, Roxadustat and Vadadustat, were rejected based on safety concerns. The FDA just recently granted the first HIF-PHI approval for Daprodustat.

An alternate approach to overcome hepcidin excess is to replenish the transferrin-Fe pool via mechanisms independent of the ferroportin-transferrin axis. Recent studies demonstrated that the natural product hinokitiol acts as a cell permeant Fe chelator and facilitates Fe redistribution across pathophysiologic gradients in rodents.2526 An aqueous formulation of iron pyrophosphate citrate (FPC), which directly replenishes the transferrin-Fe pool upon intravenous infusion, has an FDA indication for use in CKD patients receiving hemodialysis.2728 However, care must be taken to ensure that serum FPC concentrations do not exceed transferrin’s capacity to bind Fe, as exposure to toxic labile Fe occurs above this threshold.27 To safely administer therapeutically meaningful quantities of Fe, FPC must be infused over the course of hours, often several times per week.

An ideal Fe replacement drug would replenish the transferrin-Fe pool directly, rapidly, and with high specificity. A transferrin-specific Fe delivery mechanism could enable the drug to be infused quickly and safely at doses that far exceed transferrin Fe binding capacity. Transferrin saturation could thus be achieved rapidly and maintained continuously until the drug is either consumed or eliminated entirely. We posit that such a treatment could be realized through judicious application of coordination chemistry principals. We envision a chelator that: (1) binds Fe3+ with lower affinity than transferrin, (2) but with sufficiently high stability to avoid ‘off-target’ Fe release, (3) rapidly delivers Fe3+ to transferrin, (4) is not reduced to Fe2+, (5) does not sequester or redistribute endogenously present metal ions; and since CKD patients represent one of the largest patient groups in need of such therapy,1011, 29 (6) is eliminated through partial hepatobiliary excretion.

Here, we report the chelator BBG (N,N-bis(2-hydroxybenzyl)-L-glutamic acid, Chart 1A), and the corresponding Fe3+ complex Fe-BBG (Chart 2), which were conceived and synthesized to address the design elements outlined above. Drug design, characterization, in vitro screening, and preliminary in vivo evaluation of therapeutic efficacy and safety are discussed below. Taken together, our results establish proof of concept for Fe-BBG as the first entry in promising new class transferrin-targeted Fe replacement drug.

Chart 1.

Chart 1.

The ligands BBG (A), NTA (B), EDTA (C), and EHPG (D).

Chart 2.

Chart 2.

Fe-BBG speciation at pH 7.4 comprises a roughly 60:40 mixture of mono- and di-anionic Fe3+ complexes. We propose that this speciation comprises the structures [Fe(BBG)(H2O)2]1- and [Fe(BBG)(H2O)(OH)]2-.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Fe-BBG design and synthesis.

Prior literature evaluating Fe3+ trans-chelation reactions demonstrates rapid Fe transfer from nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA, Chart 1B) to apo-transferrin.28, 30 Fe-NTA is highly toxic, however, which has been attributed to the release of labile and redox active Fe.3135 The NTA ligand has also been shown to contribute toxicity through redistribution of endogenously present Zn.31 We reasoned that a structurally related tripodal tetradentate ligand functionalized instead with pendant arms to provide an increasingly hard anionic-O coordination sphere, such as 2-hydroxybenzyl, would maintain the rapid Fe3+ trans-chelation kinetics of NTA while simultaneously increasing Fe3+ binding affinity and stabilizing the Fe3+ oxidation state. The effect is illustrated by comparing the pH 7.4 stability constants (logKML pH 7.4) and Fe3+/2+ redox potentials for the Fe3+ complexes of the structurally related ligands EDTA and EHPG (Chart 1C,D, Table 1).3638 We inferred that switching two acetic acid arms for 2-hydroxybenzyl would provide a logKML pH 7.4 increase comparable to that of Fe3+-EHPG over Fe3+-EDTA - enough to disfavor “off target” trans-chelation with endogenous challenger ligands like citrate (accounts describing Fe3+-citrate thermodynamic parameters vary, with some reports indicating logKML pH 7.4 as high as 16.5),39 but also binding Fe3+ with orders of magnitude lower affinity than apo- and mono-ferric transferrin, which bind Fe3+ with logKML pH 7.4 22.3 and logKM2L pH 7.4 21.5, respectively.40 We also figured that the increasingly hard anionic donor set provided by BBG would decrease affinity for divalent metal ions relative to NTA at physiological pH, comparable to the differences observed between the Cu2+ and Zn2+ complexes of EDTA and EHPG (Table 1).36

Table 1.

Thermodynamic Parametersa for Metal Complexes of BBG and Ligands Discussed in Reference to BBG Design.

BBGb NTA4243 c EDTA38, 44 c EHPG3637 c
logKFeL pH 7.4 19.5 13.7 22.1 26.2
logKCuL pH 7.4 10.5 11.1 16.0 15.9
logKZnL pH 7.4 4.5 8.5 13.9 9.3
E1/2 for Fe3+/2+ (V vs NHE) < −0.6 V 0.38 V 0.11 V < −0.6 V
a

logKML pH 7.4 values calculated from ligand protonation and metal complex formation constants.

b

37 °C, I = 0.1M NaCl.

c

25 °C, I = 0.1M KCl.

BBG is constructed from an L-glutamic acid core. We reasoned that the anionic amino acid side chain would ensure that Fe-BBG remains negatively charged at pH 7.4, thus promoting biodistribution within the extracellular spaces where transferrin is found. We further reasoned that the modestly amphiphilic nature of the complex would promote partial hepatobiliary elimination.41

The ligand BBG was synthesized by through a double reductive amination reaction comprising L-glutamic acid and 2 mol. equiv. salicylaldehyde, and purified by preparative scale RP-HPLC (Figures S1,S2A). Fe-BBG was synthesized by mixing BBG with 1 molar equiv. FeCl3 in water, then adjusting to pH 6–8. The complex is isolated as a red solid (lmax = 462 nm, e = 2,200 M−1cm−1 at pH 7.4, Figures S2B,S3) following RP-HPLC purification (Details in SI). HPLC analysis of solutions containing Fe-BBG indicates that the complex exists as a single isomer. However, we note that a mixture of diastereomeric complexes can be potentially envisioned upon complexation of the Fe3+ by the chiral BBG ligand and the limited HPLC analysis performed for this study cannot definitively rule out the possibility of an equilibrium mixture of diastereomers.

Fe-BBG solutions thermodynamics.

The aqueous solutions thermodynamics of Fe-BBG were interrogated by pH-potentiometric titration of BBG in the absence and presence of 1 molar equiv. Fe3+(Figures 1A, S4). Spectrophotometric titrations in which relative concentrations of Fe3+ and BBG are varied indicated that 1:1 metal:ligand (ML) binding is favored under equimolar conditions (Figure S3B), and the pH-titration data were modelled accordingly. The entirety of the thermodynamic parameters are tabulated in Table S1, and from these values a logKML pH 7.4 value 19.5 was calculated for Fe-BBG (Table 1). The relative increase in logKML pH 7.4 of Fe-BBG compared to Fe-NTA are consistent with the effect predicted based on the Fe3+ complexes of EHPG and EDTA. Under the titration conditions, >99% of the Fe3+ is chelated by pH ≥ 3.0, and the final H+ attributable to the BBG ligand is consumed with pKa 4.42, resulting in a monoanionic complex. Continued titration consumes an additional three molar equivalents H+ with pKa’s of 7.66, 9.65, and 11.05. The pKa 7.66 and 9.65 events are tentatively assigned to deprotonation of putative cis-divacant water co-ligands, the pKa 11.05 event likely corresponds to coordination of third hydroxide ligand, mirroring speciation reported for Fe3+-NTA.42

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) pH-titration profile of BBG in the absence (L) and presence (FeL) of 1 molar equiv. Fe3+ ([Fe] = [BBG] = 6.1 mM, 0.1 M NaCl, 37 °C) The molar equiv. NaOH are plotted relative to BBG in the charge neutral (H4L) state. (B) pH-dependence of Fe3+ speciation in the presence of 1 molar equiv. BBG and a concentration of 6.1 mM. The purple trace corresponds to unchelated Fe3+, the green trace corresponds to the HML species, the black trace to ML (tentatively assigned as the [Fe(BBG)(H2O)2]1-), the red trace to ML(OH) ([Fe(BBG)(H2O)(OH)]2-), the teal trace to ML(OH)2, and the brown trace to ML(OH)3. The dotted vertical line is at pH 7.4.

The simulated pH dependence on Fe3+ speciation in the presence of 1 mol equiv. BBG between pH 2–10 is shown in Figure 1B. Bulk magnetic susceptibility measurements made using Evan’s NMR method yield μeff = 5.9 B.M. under conditions of 10 mM Fe-BBG, pH 7.4 and 37 °C (Table S2), consistent with high-spin Fe3+ and suggesting that μ-oxo bridged, anti-ferromagnetically coupled complexes of higher nuclearity do not contribute appreciably to Fe3+ speciation.4546 Based on the titration data and high spin electron configuration we tentatively propose that within the range of concentrations studied, Fe-BBG speciation at pH 7.4 is comprised of a roughly 60:40 mixture of the complexes [Fe(BBG)(H2O)2]1- and [Fe(BBG)(H2O)(OH)]2-, shown in Chart 2.

Fe-BBG stoichiometrically and rapidly delivers Fe3+ to apo-transferrin.

At pH 7.4, BBG binds Fe3+ with roughly 103-fold and 102-fold lower than affinity than apo- and mono-ferric transferrin.40 In this regard, Fe3+ trans-chelation from BBG to transferrin was observed through quenching of apo-transferrin intrinsic fluorescence4748 and by urea gel electrophoresis. Figures 2A and 2B respectively show λex = 280 nm fluorescence spectra and urea gel electrophoresis ladders recorded for solutions comprising apo-transferrin incubated with varying molar equivalents Fe-BBG. The data indicate stoichiometric transfer of Fe3+ from Fe-BBG to transferrin up to the point of transferrin saturation. No Fe3+ trans-chelation was observed when holo-transferrin incubated with the BBG ligand (Figure S5). The time course of the Fe3+ trans-chelation reaction (instrument temporal resolution = 6s) recorded via fluorescence emission intensity at 330 nm indicates that that Fe3+ transfer reaction is complete within 6s of mixing (Figure S6).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A and B) Fluorescence spectra (A) and urea gel electrophoresis (B) recorded on solutions containing 20 μM apo-transferrin incubated with varied concentrations of Fe-BBG ranging between 0 and 40 μM (0 to 2 molar equiv), pH 7.4 50 mM HEPES buffer with 25 mM carbonate added, 25 °C, incubation time: 2h. The concentrations of transferrin and carbonate approximate serum concentrations in vivo. FeC-Tf and FeN-TF correspond to mono-ferric transferrin with Fe3+ bound by the C- and N- lobes, respectively. (C) Concentrations of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS, generated by oxidation of 5-deoxyribose) measured in solutions that contain either no Fe or 5 mM of different Fe3+ complexes recorded 1h after incubation with 2.8 mM 5-deoxyribose under conditions designed to force redox cycling and production of ROS (2.8 mM H2O2, 0.1 mM ascorbate. pH 7.4 phosphate 100 mM, 37 °C). (D-H) Solutions of human blood plasma were incubated with varied concentration of BBG ranging between 0 to 5 mM for 1h at 37 °C and then subject to ultrafiltration through a 10 kDa molecular weight cutoff filter. The concentrations of Cu (D), Zn (E), Mn (F), Mg (G), and Ca (H) in the plasma concentrate (open circles) and ultrafiltrate (filled black circles) were not affected even by large excess of BBG.

Fe-BBG is robust against “off-target” trans-chelation.

Fe-BBG is also very robust against Fe3+ trans-chelation with endogenously present ligands commonly implicated in formation of labile and redox active Fe complexes. The UV-vis spectra of 0.1 mM Fe-BBG solutions incubated for 2h with up 10 mM (100 molar equiv.) challenger ligands such as acetate, lactate, phosphate, and carbonate reveal no evidence of trans-chelation, Figure S7AD. Analysis of equilibrium mixtures of Fe-BBG challenged with between 0 and 10 molar equiv. citric acid yield Kcomp = 0.006±0.002, indicating that BBG binds Fe3+ with 230±40-fold higher affinity than citrate, Figure S7E.

Fe-BBG does not redox cycle or generate reactive oxygen species.

Cyclic voltammetry measurements reveal no evidence of Fe-BBG reduction in scans down to −0.6 V vs. NHE (Figure S8). To screen for spontaneous redox cycling and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), Fe-BBG was incubated with 5-deoxyribose for 1h under redox forcing conditions, and the solution assayed for 5-deoxyribose oxidation products using a previously reported assay for thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS, Figure 2C).4950 Solutions containing Fe3+-NTA, Fe3+-EDTA, and FPC were assayed as positive controls. Solutions containing no added Fe complex were assayed as negative control. Unlike the other Fe complexes, no ROS were generated in samples containing Fe-BBG.

BBG does not compete for metals endogenously present in serum.

The thermodynamic stability of the Zn2+ and Cu2+ complexes of BBG were determined using pH-potentiometry, Figures S911, Tables 1 and S1. Based on the logKML pH 7.4 values for Zn2+-BBG and Cu2+-BBG (4.45 and 10.49, respectively), we do not expect the BBG ligand to sequester or redistribute metal ions present in blood serum and the extracellular spaces. For example, serum Zn2+ speciation is comprised predominantly of Zn-bound to albumin with logKML pH 7.4 = 7.0,51 whereas serum Cu speciation comprises Cu2+ bound to proteins including albumin, a-macroglobulin, and low molecular weight ligands, each with logKML pH 7.4 ~13.52

Given the Cu-BBG and Zn-BBG stability constants and high abundance of serum albumin (~660 μM) we posit that even millimolar concentrations of BBG should not disrupt homeostasis of these metal ions. To illustrate this point, human blood plasma samples containing between 0–5 mM BBG were incubated for 1h at 37 °C before separation of the low-molecular weight solution components by ultrafiltration through a 10 kDa molecular weight cutoff filter. The plasma concentrate and ultrafiltrate were assayed for concentrations of Cu and Zn, as well as Mn, Mg, and Ca by ICP-MS, Figure 2DH. Incubation with BBG had little effect on the metal ion content remaining in the plasma concentrate, nor did BBG substantially increase concentrations of any metal ion in the ultrafiltrate relative to control samples not treated with any ligand.

Fe-BBG Pharmacokinetics.

Complexes of high-spin Fe3+ are potent generators of paramagnetic relaxation enhancement.53 We leveraged this physical property to monitor Fe-BBG blood clearance and excretion following intravenous injection of 7.8 μg Fe per g body weight as Fe-BBG using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. We note that post-injection blood signal increase may receive contributions from both an increase in transferrin-bound Fe and from intact Fe-BBG. In this regard, we administered a large enough dose of Fe-BBG so that MR signal early post-injection time points would be dominated by contributions from intact Fe-BBG (see Supporting Information for calculations).

Figures 3A,B show coronal abdominal T1-weighted images at the level of the liver (3A) and kidneys (3B) prior to, 1 min, and 10 min after injection of 7.8 μg Fe per g body weight as Fe-BBG. The image series in Figure 3B shows strong enhancement of kidneys with accumulation of paramagnetic Fe in the renal pelvis 1 min after injection. This enhancement diminishes substantially by 10 min, consistent with rapid elimination through the kidneys. The image series in Figure 3A shows liver enhancement 1 min after injection which persists out to the 10 min time point. The red arrow in Figure 3A denotes strong enhancement of the gall bladder 10 min after injection, consistent hepatobiliary excretion of the injected Fe. Intact Fe-BBG was recovered in urine and bile after injection (Figures S12,13). Mono-exponential fits to plots of vena cava signal intensity vs. time indicate that post-injection blood MR signal decreases with a half-life of 5.5±2.8 min (N=4), Figures 3C (corresponding image series in Figure S14).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(A and B) Dynamic series of coronal abdominal T1-weighted images recorded prior to and after injection of 7.8 μg Fe per gram body weight as Fe-BBG show that the injected Fe is rapidly excreted through the liver (A) and kidneys (B). The red arrow shows paramagnetic Fe accumulating in gall bladder. (C) Time course of MR signal intensity normalized to pre-injection value (nSI) recorded in the vena cava. The blood signal decreases with a half-life of 5.5±2.8 min.

Serum nonheme Fe parameters after Fe-BBG injection.

To gain further insight into the in vivo fate of Fe-BBG, we analyzed blood serum harvested from mice following intravenous administration of the compound. The dose levels and timing of blood harvest were designed so that serum would be analyzed both under conditions where Fe-BBG concentrations are well in excess of transferrin and where intact Fe-BBG has been largely eliminated. Mice received a single injection comprising either 0.0, 0.56 μg Fe or 5.6 μg Fe per gram body weight Fe-BBG (placebo, low, and high doses). The mice were euthanized either 5-, 60-, or 100-min post-injection (N=3/dose/time point), blood serum was harvested, and serum nonheme Fe parameters (serum total Fe concentration, unbound iron binding capacity (UIBC), and serum total iron binding capacity (TIBC)) quantified using the Ferrozine spectrophotometric assay, Figure 4 and described in Supporting Information. In placebo treated mice, TIBC is comprised entirely of transferrin.54 However, because Fe-BBG also contributes to TIBC readings, we measured serum transferrin concentrations directly using an ELISA capture assay and estimated transferrin iron binding capacity (Tf-IBC) from these values (SI). We also analyzed representative serum samples from each group for labile and redox active Fe by spectrophotometrically assaying the kinetics dihydrorodamine 123 oxidation in serum incubated with added ascorbate.55

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Nonheme Fe parameters recorded on serum harvested from mice 5 min after i.v. injection of saline (placebo, grey filled circles) and 5 and 60 min after injection of 0.56 μg (low dose, open circles) or 5.6 μg Fe (high dose, black filled circles) per gram body weight as Fe-BBG: (A) Serum total nonheme Fe, (B) unbound iron binding capacity (UIBC), (C) total iron binding capacity (TIBC), (D) transferrin iron binding capacity (Tf-IBC), and (E) percentage transferrin saturation (%TSAT). Serum Fe, UIBC, and TIBC were measured using the ferrozine spectrophotometric assay, Tf-IBC was estimated based on serum transferrin concentration determined using ELISA capture assay (Details in SI).

Figure 4A shows that serum Fe levels are elevated substantially after Fe-BBG injection. Serum Fe levels in samples collected from mice receiving the high dose exceed spectroscopically determined TIBC recorded in placebo treated mice, or Tf-IBC estimated from the ELISA capture assay.

Figure 4B shows that serum UIBC was not overwhelmed in any sample analyzed. Even for the blood serum samples where Fe levels far exceed Tf-IBC, serum maintained its capacity to absorb Fe. We contend that UIBC preservation even under conditions where serum Fe >> Tf-IBC is attributable to the presence of the BBG ligand remaining after Fe release to transferrin. Furthermore, labile Fe concentrations remained beneath the level of our lowest concentration calibration standard (<1.1 μg/dL, or <0.20 μM), including for samples where serum Fe concentrations were elevated to >1500 μg/dL (>270 μM), Table S2.

Spectrophotometrically determined TIBC values recorded after the low dose of Fe-BBG mirror TIBC recorded in placebo treated mice, Figure 4C, and also reflect relative differences in Tf-IBC determined from direct measurements of transferrin content, Figure 4D. Together, these data are consistent with transferrin as the predominant species contributing to TIBC recorded 5–100 min after treatment with the lower dose of Fe-BBG. On the other hand, TIBC values after the high Fe-BBG dose are roughly 10-fold than from placebo 5 min post-injection and 2-fold higher between 60–100 min after injection, indicating that Fe-BBG and/ or BBG contribute substantially to overall TIBC. In this regard, percentage transferrin saturation were estimated only for samples harvested after placebo or low-dose Fe-BBG, Figure 4E.

The serum nonheme Fe data, taken together with the Fe-BBG thermodynamics parameters, transferrin delivery kinetics, and dynamic MRI data, indicate that Fe-BBG rapidly replenishes the transferrin-Fe pool in vivo. When the dose of Fe-BBG is high enough that serum Fe levels exceed Tf-IBC, injected Fe that was not delivered to transferrin remains chelated and is rapidly eliminated.

Fe-BBG corrects iron refractory iron deficiency anemia in mice.

We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of Fe-BBG in Tmprss6 knockout mice, which exhibit aberrantly high levels of hepcidin and suffer Fe restricted erythropoiesis, phenocopying human patients with IRIDA due to TMPRSS6 mutations, and recapitulating salient features of anemia of inflammation. Tmprss6 knockout mice received 29 intraperitoneal injections each containing 25 μg Fe as Fe-BBG (1.3±0.18 μg Fe per gram body weight, N=5 mice) or containing saline (placebo, N=5 mice) over 15 days. The cumulative dose of Fe was 725 μg Fe (37±0.53 μg Fe per gram body weight). The mice were euthanized 120 min after the final injection. Blood was harvested for measurement of complete blood counts, clinical chemistry, and nonheme Fe parameters. Bone marrow and liver tissue were analyzed by qPCR for expression of genes related to erythropoietic activity, Fe exposure, oxidative stress, and inflammation (Table S5). The entirety of the ex vivo analysis is tabulated in Tables S58.

Figures 5AH show representative hematologic and serum nonheme Fe parameters recorded in mice treated with Fe-BBG vs. placebo, with the entirety of the data are tabulated in Tables S56. Treatment with Fe-BBG resulted in a significant elevation of hemoglobin compared to placebo, Figure 5A. Hematocrit levels were also increased significantly (5B). Fe-BBG treatment increased mean corpuscle volume and red cell width, 5C-D, which we attribute to newly increased production of larger hemoglobin replete erythrocytes. Taken together, these changes are consistent with restoration of normal hematology. No noteworthy differences were detected between any other hematology parameters, Table S5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Representative hematology parameters (A-D), serum nonheme Fe parameters (E-H), and expression of genes related to erythropoietic activity (I,J), and Fe excess/ oxidative stress (K-M) recorded after treatment of Tmprss6 knockout male (triangles) and female (circles) mice with 725 μg Fe as Fe-BBG (37±0.53 μg Fe per g body weight) administered as 29 separate intraperitoneal doses containing 25 μg Fe each (1.3±0.18 μg Fe per g body weight) over the course of 15 days, and comparison to values recorded after treatment with placebo on an identical dosing schedule. Hemoglobin (A), hematocrit (B), mean corpuscle volume (C), red cell distribution width (D), serum total nonheme Fe (E), UIBC (F), TIBC (G), TSAT (H), relative expression of bone marrow erythroferrone (Erfe) (I) and transferrin receptor 1 (Tfrc) (J), relative liver expression of heme oxygenase 1 (Hmox1) (K), glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (Gclc) (L), and NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1 (Nqo1) (M). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 ****P < 0.0001.

Serum Fe levels were elevated in Fe-BBG treated mice (5E), which was mirrored by concomitant decrease in UIBC (5F). TIBC levels in Fe-BBG treated mice were unchanged relative to placebo (5G), indicating that Fe-BBG has cleared entirely 120 min after the final injection and that serum Fe increase arises from replenishment of the transferrin Fe pool. In this regard, %TSAT is increased significantly in Fe-BBG treated mice, with mean %TSAT increased by nearly 7-fold (5H).

Figures 5I,J compare relative expression of genes related to erythropoietic activity and Fe demand in mice treated with placebo vs Fe-BBG. The data demonstrate that bone marrow erythroferrone (Erfe, 5K) is significantly downregulated in Fe-BBG treated mice, consistent with re-hemoglobinization. Transferrin receptor type 1 (Tfrc, 5J) and glycophorin A (GypA, Table S7), proteins abundantly expressed by erythroid precursor cells, were also downregulated in Fe-BBG treated mice, consistent with restoration of normative red blood cell maturation processes.

Our preliminary pharmacokinetics data indicate that Fe-BBG elimination is rapid compared to the rate of transferrin-Fe turnover in mice (~45 min reported for normal mice),56 and thus much of the injected compound is excreted intact. As the dose is increased, the relative fraction of injected Fe absorbed and utilized by the erythron will decrease. For this reason, we opted to treat IRIDA in Tmprss6 knockout through a series of multiple repeated small doses of Fe, rather than fewer large doses. The serum half-life of transferrin-Fe in iron deficiency humans is reported to be ~50 min,57 whereas based on dose-conversion principals we estimate Fe-BBG elimination half-life in humans will longer by over an order of magnitude.58 In other words, we expect a substantially larger fraction of the injected Fe to be absorbed by humans receiving an equivalent dose of Fe-BBG.

Preliminary assessment of Fe-BBG safety.

Repeat dosing of Fe-BBG to Tmprss6 knockout mice did not generate significant differences in any clinical chemistry parameters, including serum markers routinely used in drug toxicity screens, Table S8. Fe-BBG did not trigger upregulation of liver heme oxygenase 1 (Hmox1), glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (Gclc), or NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1 (Nqo1), which taken together indicate that Fe-BBG did not result in oxidative stress, Figures 5KM. Expression of Serum amyloid A1 (Saa1), a sensitive marker of inflammation, was also unchanged after repeat dosing with Fe-BBG, Table S7.

CONCLUSION.

We designed Fe-BBG as a potential drug to replenish transferrin Fe pool directly, rapidly, and with high specificity. Fe-BBG binds Fe3+ with low thermodynamic stability relative to transferrin, but with high enough stability to avoid “off target” trans-chelation reactions. The BBG ligand stabilizes the Fe3+ oxidation state exclusively and remains unreactive even under conditions designed to force redox cycling and to generate ROS. The BBG ligand also binds to divalent metal ions with low affinity, and in vitro assays show that even a large excess of BBG does not strip Cu2+ or Zn2+ from ligands endogenously present in blood. Studies to interrogate Fe pharmacokinetics and serum Fe speciation indicate that Fe-BBG efficiently delivers Fe3+ to transferrin in vivo, and that injected Fe remains chelated and is rapidly eliminated under conditions of transferrin saturation. Fe-BBG is eliminated through mixed renal and hepatobiliary excretion as the intact complex, indicating that the compound can be efficiently cleared even from patients with advanced kidney disease. Treatment with Fe-BBG was shown to provide anemia correction in Tmprss6 knockout mice, which suffer anemia driven by hepcidin excess, recapitulating human IRIDA and salient features of anemia of inflammation. Repeat dosing with Fe-BBG did not adversely affect any CBC parameter, significantly alter any clinical chemistry parameters, or trigger genes related to oxidative stress and inflammation. Fe-BBG represents the first entry for a new class of transferrin-targeting Fe replacement drug. This new class of therapeutic could profoundly impact the quality of care for patients suffering anemia driven entirely or in part by pathologic restriction of Fe.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Funding Sources

E.M.G gratefully acknowledges support from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R21DK130004, R01DK120663). Instrumentation resources at the MGH Martinos Center and Institute for Innovation in Imaging (i3) are supported by the NIH Office of the Director (S10OD032138, S10OD025234). J.L.B gratefully acknowledges support from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK087727, R01DK128068) and the Patricia and Scott Eston Massachusetts General Hospital Research Scholar Award. A.L.F gratefully acknowledges support from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK007540).

Financial Disclosure Statement

E.M.G is a co-founder, holds equity, and receives consulting income from Reveal Pharmaceuticals, a company that is developing contrast agents for MRI. J.L.B. had during the course of this research a financial interest in Ferrumax Pharmaceuticals, a company focused on targeting RGM proteins (including hemojuvelin) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP/TGF-beta) superfamily signaling as hepcidin modulating agents for the treatment of anemia and other iron disorders. The interests of E.M.G and J.L.B were reviewed and are managed by Massachusetts General Hospital and Mass General Brigham in accordance with their conflict-of-interest policies.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.

Experiment details, synthesis procedures, compounds characterization, additional spectra, additional CBC, clinical chemistry, and qPCR data.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Goodnough LT; Nemeth E; Ganz T, Detection, evaluation, and management of iron-restricted erythropoiesis. Blood 2010, 116 (23), 4754–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ganz T, Anemia of Inflammation. The New England journal of medicine 2019, 381 (12), 1148–1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Finberg KE; Heeney MM; Campagna DR; Aydinok Y; Pearson HA; Hartman KR; Mayo MM; Samuel SM; Strouse JJ; Markianos K; Andrews NC; Fleming MD, Mutations in TMPRSS6 cause iron-refractory iron deficiency anemia (IRIDA). Nat Genet 2008, 40 (5), 569–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nemeth E; Tuttle MS; Powelson J; Vaughn MB; Donovan A; Ward DM; Ganz T; Kaplan J, Hepcidin regulates cellular iron efflux by binding to ferroportin and inducing its internalization. Science 2004, 306 (5704), 2090–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aschemeyer S; Qiao B; Stefanova D; Valore EV; Sek AC; Ruwe TA; Vieth KR; Jung G; Casu C; Rivella S; Jormakka M; Mackenzie B; Ganz T; Nemeth E, Structure-function analysis of ferroportin defines the binding site and an alternative mechanism of action of hepcidin. Blood 2018, 131 (8), 899–910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Billesbolle CB; Azumaya CM; Kretsch RC; Powers AS; Gonen S; Schneider S; Arvedson T; Dror RO; Cheng Y; Manglik A, Structure of hepcidin-bound ferroportin reveals iron homeostatic mechanisms. Nature 2020, 586 (7831), 807–811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Knutson MD, Iron transport proteins: Gateways of cellular and systemic iron homeostasis. J Biol Chem 2017, 292 (31), 12735–12743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Girelli D; Ugolini S; Busti F; Marchi G; Castagna A, Modern iron replacement therapy: clinical and pathophysiological insights. Int J Hematol 2018, 107 (1), 16–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Macdougall IC; Bircher AJ; Eckardt KU; Obrador GT; Pollock CA; Stenvinkel P; Swinkels DW; Wanner C; Weiss G; Chertow GM; Conference P, Iron management in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int 2016, 89 (1), 28–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Locatelli F; Mazzaferro S; Yee J, Iron Therapy Challenges for the Treatment of Nondialysis CKD Patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016, 11 (7), 1269–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Del Vecchio L; Locatelli F, Anemia in chronic kidney disease patients: treatment recommendations and emerging therapies. Expert Rev Hematol 2014, 7 (4), 495–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Howaldt S; Domenech E; Martinez N; Schmidt C; Bokemeyer B, Long-Term Effectiveness of Oral Ferric Maltol vs Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose for the Treatment of Iron-Deficiency Anemia in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022, 28 (3), 373–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sebastiani G; Wilkinson N; Pantopoulos K, Pharmacological Targeting of the Hepcidin/Ferroportin Axis. Front Pharmacol 2016, 7, 160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sun CC; Vaja V; Chen S; Theurl I; Stepanek A; Brown DE; Cappellini MD; Weiss G; Hong CC; Lin HY; Babitt JL, A hepcidin lowering agent mobilizes iron for incorporation into red blood cells in an adenine-induced kidney disease model of anemia in rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013, 28 (7), 1733–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Petzer V; Tymoszuk P; Asshoff M; Carvalho J; Papworth J; Deantonio C; Bayliss L; Wake MS; Seifert M; Brigo N; Valente de Souza L; Hilbe R; Grubwieser P; Demetz E; Dichtl S; Volani C; Berger S; Bohm F; Hoffmann A; Pfeifhofer-Obermair C; von Raffay L; Sopper S; Arndt S; Bosserhoff A; Kautz L; Perrier P; Nairz M; Wolf D; Weiss G; Germaschewski V; Theurl I, A fully human anti-BMP6 antibody reduces the need for erythropoietin in rodent models of the anemia of chronic disease. Blood 2020, 136 (9), 1080–1090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Babitt JL; Eisenga MF; Haase VH; Kshirsagar AV; Levin A; Locatelli F; Malyszko J; Swinkels DW; Tarng DC; Cheung M; Jadoul M; Winkelmayer WC; Drueke TB; Conference P, Controversies in optimal anemia management: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference. Kidney Int 2021, 99 (6), 1280–1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Singh AK; Szczech L; Tang KL; Barnhart H; Sapp S; Wolfson M; Reddan D; Investigators C, Correction of anemia with epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease. The New England journal of medicine 2006, 355 (20), 2085–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Garimella PS; Katz R; Patel KV; Kritchevsky SB; Parikh CR; Ix JH; Fried LF; Newman AB; Shlipak MG; Harris TB; Sarnak MJ; Health ABCS, Association of Serum Erythropoietin With Cardiovascular Events, Kidney Function Decline, and Mortality: The Health Aging and Body Composition Study. Circ Heart Fail 2016, 9 (1), e002124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lippi G; Franchini M; Favaloro EJ, Thrombotic complications of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Semin Thromb Hemost 2010, 36 (5), 537–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jelkmann W; Bohlius J; Hallek M; Sytkowski AJ, The erythropoietin receptor in normal and cancer tissues. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2008, 67 (1), 39–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Debeljak N; Solar P; Sytkowski AJ, Erythropoietin and cancer: the unintended consequences of anemia correction. Front Immunol 2014, 5, 563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McCallum W; Weiner DE, HIF-PHIs for Anemia Management in CKD: Potential and Uncertainty ASCEND. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022, 17 (8), 1255–1258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Haase VH, Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors in the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl (2011) 2021, 11 (1), 8–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Macdougall IC, Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase enzyme inhibitors: ready for primetime? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2022, 31 (5), 399–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Grillo AS; SantaMaria AM; Kafina MD; Cioffi AG; Huston NC; Han M; Seo YA; Yien YY; Nardone C; Menon AV; Fan J; Svoboda DC; Anderson JB; Hong JD; Nicolau BG; Subedi K; Gewirth AA; Wessling-Resnick M; Kim J; Paw BH; Burke MD, Restored iron transport by a small molecule promotes absorption and hemoglobinization in animals. Science 2017, 356 (6338), 608–616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ekaputri S; Choi EK; Sabelli M; Aring L; Green KJ; Chang J; Bao K; Choi HS; Iwase S; Kim J; Corradini E; Pietrangelo A; Burke MD; Seo YA, A small molecule redistributes iron in ferroportin-deficient mice and patient-derived primary macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022, 119 (26), e2121400119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pratt RD; Swinkels DW; Ikizler TA; Gupta A, Pharmacokinetics of Ferric Pyrophosphate Citrate, a Novel Iron Salt, Administered Intravenously to Healthy Volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 2017, 57 (3), 312–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pratt R; Handelman GJ; Edwards TE; Gupta A, Ferric pyrophosphate citrate: interactions with transferrin. Biometals 2018, 31 (6), 1081–1089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Drueke TB; Locatelli F; Clyne N; Eckardt KU; Macdougall IC; Tsakiris D; Burger HU; Scherhag A; Investigators C, Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia. The New England journal of medicine 2006, 355 (20), 2071–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bates GW; Billups C; Saltman P, The kinetics and mechanism of iron (3)exchange between chelates and transferrin. I. The complexes of citrate and nitrilotriacetic acid. J Biol Chem 1967, 242 (12), 2810–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Leibold E; Deckardt K; Mellert W; Potthoff-Karl B; Grundler O; Jackh R, NTA and Fe(III)NTA: differential patterns of renal toxicity in subchronic studies. Hum Exp Toxicol 2002, 21 (8), 445–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Randerath E; Watson WP; Zhou GD; Chang J; Randerath K, Intensification and depletion of specific bulky renal DNA adducts (I-compounds) following exposure of male F344 rats to the renal carcinogen ferric nitrilotriacetate (Fe-NTA). Mutat Res 1995, 341 (4), 265–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Umemura T; Sai K; Takagi A; Hasegawa R; Kurokawa Y, Oxidative DNA damage, lipid peroxidation and nephrotoxicity induced in the rat kidney after ferric nitrilotriacetate administration. Cancer Lett 1990, 54 (1–2), 95–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Preece NE; Evans PF; Howarth JA; King LJ; Parke DV, The induction of autoxidative tissue damage by iron nitrilotriacetate in rats and mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1988, 93 (1), 89–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hamazaki S; Okada S; Ebina Y; Fujioka M; Midorikawa O, Nephrotoxicity of ferric nitrilotriacetate. An electron-microscopic and metabolic study. Am J Pathol 1986, 123 (2), 343–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bannochie CJ; Martell AE, Affinities of Racemic N-Ethylenebis[2-(o-hydroxyphenyl)glycine] for Divalent and Trivalent Metal Ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1989, 111 (13), 4735–4742. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kuznik N; Jewula P; Oczek L; Kozlowicz S; Grucela A; Domagala W, EHPG iron(III) Complexes as Potential Contrast Agents for MRI. Acta Chim. Slov 2014, 61, 87–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brausam A; Maigut J; Meier R; Szilagyi PA; Buschmann H-J; Massa W; Homannay Z; van Eldik R, Detailed Spectroscopic, Thermodynamic, and Kinetic Studies on the Protolytic Equilibria of FeIIIcydta and the Activation of Hydrogen Peroxide. Inorg. Chem 2009, 48 (16), 7864–7884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Silva AM; Kong X; Parkin MC; Cammack R; Hider RC, Iron(III) citrate speciation in aqueous solution. Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003) 2009, (40), 8616–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Harris WR; Pecoraro VL, Thermodynamic binding constants for gallium transferrin. Biochemistry 1983, 22 (2), 292–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang J; Wang H; Ramsay IA; Erstad DJ; Fuchs BC; Tanabe KK; Caravan P; Gale EM, Manganese-Based Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Tumors: Structure-Activity Relationships and Lead Candidate Evaluation. J. Med. Chem 2018, 61 (19), 8811–8824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Motekaitis RJ; Martell AE, The Iron(III) and Iron(II) Complexes of Nitrilotriacetic acid. J. Coord. Chem 1994, 31 (1), 67–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Herbel MJ; Suarez DL; Goldberg S; Gao S, Evaluation of Chemical Amendments for pH and Redox Stabilization in Aqueous Suspensions of Three California Soils. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J 2007, 71 (3), 927–939. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ma R; Motekaitis RJ; Martell AE, Synthesis of N-hydroxybenzylethylenediamine-NN’N’-triacetic acid and the stabilities of its complexes with divalent and trivalent metal ions. Inorg. Chem. Acta 1995, 233, 137–143. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schugar HJ; Rossman GR; Barraclough CG; Gray HB, Electronic Structure of Oxo-Bridge Iron(III) Dimers. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1972, 94 (8), 2683–2690. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang H; Wong A; Lewis LC; Nemeth GR; Jordan VC; Bacon JW; Caravan P; Shafaat HS; Gale EM, Rational Ligand Design Enables pH Control over Aqueous Iron Magnetostructural Dynamics and Relaxometric Properties. Inorg Chem 2020, 59 (23), 17712–17721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lehrer SS, Fluorescence and absorption studies of the binding of copper and iron to transferrin. J Biol Chem 1969, 244 (13), 3613–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.James NG; Berger CL; Byrne SL; Smith VC; MacGillivray RT; Mason AB, Intrinsic fluorescence reports a global conformational change in the N-lobe of human serum transferrin following iron release. Biochemistry 2007, 46 (37), 10603–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Aruoma OI, Deoxyribose assay for detecting hydroxyl radicals. Methods in Enzymology 1994, 233, 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Graf E; Mahoney JR; Bryant RG; Eaton JW, Iron-catalyzed hydroxyl radical formation. Stringent requirement for free iron coordination site. J Biol Chem 1984, 259 (6), 3620–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bal W; Sokolowska M; Kurowska E; Faller P, Binding of transition metal ions to albumin: sites, affinities and rates. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013, 1830 (12), 5444–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Falcone E; Okafor M; Vitale N; Raibaut L; Sour A; Faller P, Extracellular Cu2+ pools and their detection: From current knowledge to next-generation probes. Coord. Chem. Rev 2021, 433, 213727. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gupta A; Caravan P; Price WS; Platas-Iglesias C; Gale EM, Applications for Transition-Metal Chemistry in Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Inorg. Chem 2020, 59 (10), 6648–6678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Breuer W; Ronson A; Slotki IN; Abramov A; Hershko C; Cabantchik ZI, The assessment of serum nontransferrin-bound iron in chelation therapy and iron supplementation. Blood 2000, 95 (9), 2975–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Esposito BP; Breuer W; Sirankapracha P; Pootrakul P; Hershko C; Cabantchik ZI, Labile plasma iron in iron overload: redox activity and susceptibility to chelation. Blood 2003, 102 (7), 2670–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Letendre ED; Holbein BE, Turnover in the transferrin iron pool during the hypoferremic phase of experimental Neisseria meningitidis infection in mice. Infect Immun 1983, 39 (1), 50–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.van Vuren AJ; van Wijk R; van Beers EJ; Marx JJM, Liver Iron Retention Estimated from Utilization of Oral and Intravenous Radioiron in Various Anemias and Hemochromatosis in Humans. Int J Mol Sci 2020, 21 (3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nair AB; Jacob S, A simple practice guide for dose conversion between animals and human. J. Basic Clin. Pharm 2016, 7 (2), 27–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

RESOURCES