Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Feb 3;36(6):e460–e464. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17950

Duration of acceptable delay between the time of diagnosis and treatment of melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma

M Alam 1,2,3,4,*, JR Etzkorn 5, JG Albertini 6,7, JS Bordeaux 8,9, ML Council 10, IA Maher 11, KS Nehal 12, DG Brodland 13,14, AF Haas 15, BY Kang 1, SA Ibrahim 1, RE Christensen 1, E Poon 1, B Worley 1,16
PMCID: PMC10314821  NIHMSID: NIHMS1907617  PMID: 35067989

Dear Editor,

Since tumours are usually treated soon after they are detected, there is limited guidance regarding when prompt treatment of skin cancer is important, and when delay is acceptable. Further delays may not be planned but rather attributable to inadvertent or uncontrollable patient or insurance-related factors,17 or emergencies like pandemics.8

When mean delays are of long duration, some guidance is necessary to help dermatologists minimize tumour-mediated tissue disfigurement, functional and sensory loss, metastasis and death. Given the impracticality of controlled studies of treatment delay, it is appropriate to consider expert opinion.

This cross-sectional survey of American College of Mohs Surgery (ACMS) members elicited expert opinion about the acceptable post-diagnosis delay before treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and melanoma. This study was deemed exempt by the Western Institutional Review Board under 45 CFR 46.104(d)(2).

For common presentations of BCC, cSCC and melanoma, participants were asked to note the acceptable days of delay between diagnosis (e.g. by biopsy) and treatment in five scenarios: (1) for a family member or close friend; (2) per standard office or institution policy; (3) per standard national US guidelines; (4) in an epidemic/pandemic with appropriate PPE available; and (5) in an epidemic/pandemic without appropriate PPE.

Three hundred and eighty-nine responses were recorded (52.8% of the 737 who accessed the link). In addition to mean days of acceptable delay, Fig. 1 displays the range of responses within one and two standard deviations of the mean, respectively. Within each tumour type, tumours with a greater risk of harm were associated with briefer acceptable delay. Without exception, the two standard deviation range included zero, and so was useful primarily for describing the upper bound of acceptable delay. The lowest acceptable upper bound, 32 days, was associated with invasive melanoma ≥0.8 mm depth in either a family member or close friend, or per standard office or institution policy. The highest, 254 days, was associated with non-high risk BCC appropriate for surgical excision during a pandemic when appropriate PPE is not available.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Average acceptable days to delay treatment for BCC, cSCC and melanoma. For each of the three types of skin cancer, the acceptable number of days of delay for five specific circumstances are shown (e.g. family or close friend, standard office or institution policy). For each of the five circumstances, the average acceptable days of delay for three different presentations of the skin cancer are depicted, ranging from least to greatest severity. Each line displays the mean number of days, as well as the range of responses within one and two standard deviations of the mean. Abbreviations: BCC, basal cell carcinoma; cSCC, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Pairwise analyses between scenarios within the same tumour type are presented in Fig. 2. For all comparisons, a significantly longer delay (P < 0.001; range 7–21 days) was appropriate in a pandemic when PPE is not available compared to when it is. In a pandemic when PPE is available, significant delay beyond standard national guidelines was acceptable for all BCCs (4–13 days, P ≤ 0.05), cSCC in situ (9 days, P = 0.028) and melanoma in situ (5 days, P = 0.034). For invasive SCCs and melanomas, no further delay was deemed appropriate.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pairwise comparisons of acceptable days to delay treatment between specific circumstances (e.g. family or close friend, standard office or institution policy) for different presentations of BCC, cSCC and melanoma (ranging from least to greatest severity). The number in each box is the difference in the acceptable days to delay between the condition in the column as vs. the condition in the top row. Positive values indicate a greater number of days are acceptable in the column condition, whereas negative values indicate a fewer number of days are acceptable in the column condition. For example, for ‘BCC appropriate for surgical excision that is other than high risk’, the average number of acceptable days to delay treatment for a family member or close friend is 46 days less than for circumstances when PPE is not available. Abbreviations: BCC, basal cell carcinoma; cSCC, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Although skin cancer experts differ regarding the treatment delay they deem acceptable, they are aligned in their estimation of appropriate relative delay across different scenarios. Overall, experts believed that less delay in treatment was appropriate for malignancies with greater overall risk of harm, such as SCCs and melanoma.

Since respondents were in the United States, the results may not be globally generalizable. Additionally, factors beyond patient or physician control, such as pandemics and emergencies, may limit physicians’ ability to safely accommodate patients.

In summary, there is wide variation in the duration of delay between diagnosis and treatment of skin cancer deemed acceptable by experts. Future investigations may detect and track growth in skin cancers with low risk of metastasis, and estimate the rate of change in size, as well as the time-associated risk of functional loss and metastasis. If such research is conducted, repeating the current survey in 5–10 years may reveal greater consensus regarding appropriate delay. In the meantime, the conclusions of this study can not only inform the timing of cancer care in routine circumstances but also in resource-constrained environments.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Etzkorn has received payments from Replimune for his participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Data Availability Statement

Data available upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Adamson AS, Zhou L, Baggett CD, Thomas NE, Meyer AM. Association of delays in surgery for melanoma with insurance type. JAMA Dermatol 2017; 153: 1106–1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lott JP, Narayan D, Soulos PR, Aminawung J, Gross CP. Delay of surgery for melanoma among medicare beneficiaries. JAMA Dermatol 2015; 151: 731–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Niehues NB, Evanson B, Smith WA, Fiore CT, Parekh P. Melanoma patient notification and treatment timelines. Dermatol Online J 2019; 25:13030/qt0x15j2dk. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Damato EM, Damato BE. Detection and time to treatment of uveal melanoma in the United Kingdom: an evaluation of 2384 patients. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 1582–1589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McKechnie AJ. See-and-treat surgery for facial skin cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 52: 598–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wehner MR, Dalma N, Landefeld C et al. Natural history of lesions suspicious for basal cell carcinoma in older adults in Ikaria, Greece. Br J Dermatol 2018; 179: 767–768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alam M, Goldberg LH, Silapunt S et al. Delayed treatment and continued growth of nonmelanoma skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 64: 839–848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Valenti M, Pavia G, Gargiulo L et al. Impact of delay in follow-up due to COVID-19 pandemic on skin cancer progression: a real-life experience from an Italian hub hospital. Int J Dermatol 2021; 60: 860–863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data available upon reasonable request.

RESOURCES