Abstract
The transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) ion channel is a member of the TRP channel family that is involved in sensing noxious stimuli that elicit pain and inflammation. Because of its critical physiological role and therapeutic importance, great efforts have been made to understand the structure and mechanism of TRPA1. Several human TRPA1 structures have been reported using single particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) over the last six years. Here, we present a protocol for the heterologous expression, large-scale purification, and nanodisc reconstitution of the human TRPA1 channel for cryo-EM and biochemical studies.
Keywords: Ion channel, TRP channels, TRPA1 channel, recombinant protein expression, nanodisc, cryo-EM
Introduction
Transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels comprise a superfamily of cation channels which impart the myriad sensations of pain and itch, warm or cold, as well as the detection of pungent compounds. As a member of the diverse TRP channel family, mammalian TRPA1 primarily functions as a sensor for structurally diverse, noxious environmental stimuli such as allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), cannabinoids, and endogenous molecules involved in inflammatory stress such as 4-hydroxynoneal (Bandell et al. 2004, Hinman et al. 2006, Macpherson et al. 2007, Trevisani et al. 2007, Taylor-Clark et al. 2009). There is also accumulating evidence that TRPA1 is sensitive to either hot or cold, displaying significant tunability in temperature sensation (Laursen et al. 2015). Thus, TRPA1 has been established as a promising drug target for suppressing pain and inflammation (Han et al. 2018, Koivisto et al. 2018, Xie and Hu 2018).
Despite the great interest and research effort, only two crystal structures of TRP channels have been reported to date (Saotome et al. 2016, Zubcevic, Le, et al. 2018). This is largely due to their inherent flexibility, which makes TRP channels challenging targets for crystallization. Since the dawn of the cryo-EM “resolution revolution” in 2012–2013, we have witnessed an exponential growth in reported TRP channel structures (Madej and Ziegler 2018, Yuan 2019, Cao 2020, Zubcevic 2020, Zubcevic and Lee 2019), owing mainly to the development of direct electron detectors and advances in data processing strategies (Cheng et al. 2015). Currently, hundreds of TRP channel structures (both cryo-EM and X-ray) are available in the Protein Data Bank (Berman et al. 2000). For TRPA1, multiple structures reconstituted into various systems (detergents, amphipol, and nanodiscs) have been reported since 2015 (Paulsen et al. 2015, Liu et al. 2021, Suo et al. 2020, Zhao et al. 2020). It is noteworthy that only one study, so far, has been reported for human TRPA1 reconstituted in lipid nanodiscs (Suo et al. 2020).
Compared to X-ray crystallography, which requires samples with very high homogeneity and stability, requirements for sample quality in cryo-EM studies are less demanding, allowing for structural determination of proteins with high instability and flexibility. In our experience, however, in order to obtain a sub-3Å reconstruction the biochemical behavior of the sample must be optimized. Although sub-optimal sample quality can often be offset by simply collecting more data, the current scarcity and price in accessing high-end electron microscopes often discourages prolonged data collection. Thus, preparing sample to the highest purity and homogeneity should still be considered the top priority in single particle 3D cryo-EM reconstruction. Batch-to-batch consistency is necessary in order to optimize cryo-EM sample freezing conditions so that structures in complex with different ligands, binding partners, etc. may be obtained. (Carragher et al. 2019). It is critical to maintain consistency throughout different preparations to allow proper interpretation among these data.
As with many membrane proteins, TRP channels form both specific and non-specific interactions with membrane lipids. The specific interactions between various TRP channels and lipids and lipid-like molecules have been well-studied in recent publications (Gao et al. 2016, Zubcevic, Herzik, et al. 2018, Zubcevic et al. 2019, Yin et al. 2019, Yin and Lee 2020). During detergent solubilization and subsequent size-exclusion chromatography, most of the protein-bound lipids are stripped away. Reconstituting membrane proteins into lipid nanodiscs provides a membrane-like environment for the protein and thus, enables the study of protein-lipid interactions in detail. Moreover, certain toxins or ligands require a lipid membrane to bind to ion channels (Bae et al. 2016, Henriques et al. 2016), thereby making TRP-nanodisc systems ideal for these types of studies.
Here, we present a protocol for human TRPA1 protein expression, purification and nanodisc reconstitution for cryo-EM structural studies (Suo et al. 2020).
Step-by Step Method Details
Generating baculovirus for TRPA1 expression
Timing: 16–17 days
The codon optimized full-length Homo sapiens TRPA1 gene was synthesized (BioBasic) then cloned into the pEG-BacMam vector (Goehring et al. 2014), in-frame with a tandem C-terminal FLAG-tag and 10×His-tag. Baculovirus is generated in Sf9 cells according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Bac-to-Bac, Invitrogen).
Baculovirus encoding the TRPA1 gene is amplified by passaging to P3. Freshly harvested virus-containing supernatant is used to infect HEK293S GnTI− cells within two weeks.
Cell culture and TRPA1 expression in HEK293S GnTI− cells
Timing: 3 days
HEK293S GnTI− cells are purchased from ATCC. A frozen aliquot is thawed and passaged according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cells are used for protein expression only between the 4th and 22nd passages. Declining protein yield was observed after the 22nd passage, necessitating replacement with freshly thawed cells.
Cells are maintained in FreeStyle293 Media (Life Technologies) supplemented with 2% (v/v) Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, Gibco) and 0.5% (v/v) penicillin and streptomycin (Gibco), in an orbital shaker incubator set at 130 rpm, 37°C and an atmosphere of 8% CO2 and 80–100% humidity. Typically, 1.5–2 L cultures are inoculated from a master stock and grown to a density of 3×106 mL−1. The culture is then infected with 8% (v/v) P3 baculovirus together with supplementation of 3μM ruthenium red [diluted from a 6 mM stock] to reduce channel toxicity. Cultures are incubated for 20–22 hours at 37°C in the presence of 8% CO2 before 10 mM sodium butyrate [diluted from a 1 M stock] is added to boost protein expression. The cultures are then transferred to an incubator set at 30°C, 8% CO2 and 130 rpm shaking. Cells are then harvested after 40–44 hours.
TRPA1 Protein purification
Timing: 5–8 hours
-
Prepare size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) buffers. Two different SEC buffers are used in this protocol. SEC buffer (detergent) contains 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM inositol hexaphosphate (InsP6), 3 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP), and 0.07% (w/v) digitonin. Digitonin powder is directly added to buffer, and SEC buffer (detergent) is separately prepared with 5% digitonin stock mentioned in step 2. The buffer is filtered twice to remove insoluble digitonin through a 0.45 μm filter membrane. SEC buffer (detergent-free) contains 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM InsP6, and 3 mM TCEP. This buffer is filtered once before use.
Note: Both buffers must be prepared fresh to avoid oxidization of TCEP.
-
Prepare 5% (w/v) digitonin stock for protein solubilization. Weigh out the desired amount of digitonin powder (typically 700–750 mg for each TRPA1 sample preparation) and gently resuspend in TBS (20 mM Tris pH8, 150 mM NaCl) in a 50-ml Falcon tube. Place the tube in a 95 – 100 °C water bath and incubate for 10 minutes, with occasional inversion every 3–4 minutes. All the solid should dissolve within 2–3 minutes. Leave the solution to slowly cool to room temperature before use.
Note: It is important to slowly cool down the 5% digitonin stock after boiling since a rapid cooling can cause precipitation of the digitonin. Typically, the cooling process takes 30 minutes.
-
Prior to harvesting the 1.5–2 L culture, the cells are inspected for morphology and viability under an optical microscope. The cells are then pelleted by centrifugation at 550 × g for 12 min and the cell pellets are weighed.
Note: Cell pellets should appear pink due to the added ruthenium red, while the clarified media should appear nearly colorless.
Prepare lysis buffer (20 mM Tris pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 12 μg mL−1 leupeptin [from 1 mg mL−1 stock], 12 μg mL−1 pepstatin [from 1 mg mL−1 stock], 12 μg mL−1 aprotinin [from 0.5 mg mL−1 stock], 2 μg ml −1 DNase I, 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride [PMSF, from 100 mM stock], 1 mM inositol hexaphosphate [InsP6], 5 mM TCEP-HCl).
-
Resuspend the cell pellets in approximately 2.2 ml of lysis buffer per gram of cell pellet and gently pipet up and down to break down cell clumps. Add the freshly prepared 5% digitonin dropwise to a final concentration of 1%, making up the final solubilization volume to 4 ml per gram of cell pellet. For example, 10 g (~10 ml in volume) of harvested cells would need to be resuspended 22 ml of lysis buffer, followed by addition of 8 ml of 5% digitonin stock, then making the final volume up to 40 ml. Solubilize membranes with gentle agitation or stirring for 1 hour at 4°C.
Note: It is normal to notice small clumps (<1 mm in size) form within the first 10–15 minutes of solubilization. If larger clumps form, break them up using a serological pipet.
Clarify the solubilization mix by centrifuging at 13000 x g for 30 minutes, 4°C. Take a small aliquot of both the supernatant and pellet for SDS-PAGE analysis.
Transfer the supernatant to a clean 50 mL Falcon tube and add another 1 mM PMSF, followed by 0.5 ml (resin volume) of anti-FLAG M2 resin per liter of cell culture. Rotate at 4°C for 1 hour to allow protein binding to the FLAG resin.
Meanwhile, prepare the gravity-flow columns, FLAG-wash buffer (same composition as SEC buffer (detergent)) and FLAG-elution buffer (same composition as SEC buffer (detergent) and supplemented with 0.1 mg mL−1 FLAG peptide).
When binding is complete, spin down the FLAG resin by centrifuging at 700 × g for 10 minutes, 4°C. Pour off most (but not all) of the supernatant and load the rest into a gravity-flow column.
Wash resin with 10 column volumes (CV) of FLAG-wash buffer.
Elute protein by five repeated additions of 1 CV FLAG-elution buffer; incubating 5 minutes then draining and collecting the flow through with each addition. Concentrate the eluted protein to 500 μl using an Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filter (Millipore, 100 kDa cutoff) and inject the protein sample onto a Superose 6 10/300 size-exclusion column (GE Life Sciences) that has been pre-equilibrated with SEC buffer (detergent). Analyze the size-exclusion chromatogram and perform SDS-PAGE analysis to determine protein yield and homogeneity. Collect and pool peak fractions containing TRPA1 and concentrate, as before, to 400–500 μl for nanodisc reconstitution.
Preparation of POPC:POPE:POPG (3:1:1) mixture for nanodiscs reconstitution
Timing: 1 hour
-
Preparation of lipids for nanodiscs reconstitution. For TRPA1, we used a 3:1:1 (wt:wt:wt) mixture of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (POPE), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1’-rac-glycerol) (POPG), from Avanti Polar Lipids. Lipids are formulated as 10 mg mL−1 solutions in chloroform.
Note: The choice of lipids should be optimized and tested for individual proteins for optimal reconstitution. The inclusion of signaling lipids, such as phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, into the lipid mix may be beneficial.
The desired quantities of chloroform-solubilized lipids (see below) are transferred to a 10 mL glass tube with screw cap (VWR). The chloroform is evaporated using a gentle argon stream while continuously rotating the tube so that the lipids form a thin, semi-transparent film around the bottom of the tube. After the last traces of chloroform have evaporated, leave the tube under a stream of argon for an additional 5 minutes to ensure complete removal of chloroform.
-
Re-dissolve the lipids in half the initial volume’s-worth of pentane (reagent grade, Sigma-Aldrich) and repeat the above procedure in step 2 to remove any residual organic solvent.
Note: It is important that the lipids are dried completely as residual organic solvent will interfere with the nanodisc reconstitution.
Hydrate the lipid film by adding the desired volume of TBS to the glass tube to make the final lipid concentration 10 mg mL−1. Vortex vigorously for 5 minutes to completely resuspend all of the lipid film, which should result in an opaque, cloudy solution.
To form the small unilamellar vesicles required for nanodisc reconstitution, the lipid suspension is sonicated using a bath sonicator. To avoid over-heating, alternately sonicate for 1 min followed by placing on ice for 1 min. After 10–15 rounds of sonicating, the lipid suspension should appear semi-transparent. To further solubilize the lipids, transfer the cleared lipid solution to a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube and add digitonin to a final concentration of 0.1% from a 5% stock solution; rotate the tube at 4°C for 2–3 hours, or until ready to use.
TRPA1-MSP2N2 nanodisc reconstitution
Timing: 16–20 hours
Membrane scaffold protein, MSP2N2, was expressed and purified according to a previously published protocol (Ritchie et al. 2009). Purified MSP2N2 was concentrated to 4 mg mL −1, frozen as 100 μL aliquots and stored at −80 °C.
- Measure the protein concentration of the pooled and concentrated SEC fractions by OD280 and/or other methods. Determine the amounts of lipid and MSP needed for reconstitution according to a 1:3:200 molar ratio of TRPA1 (tetramer): MSP2N2: lipids. For example, given 400 μL of TRPA1 at 2 mg mL−1, prepare the following:
TRPA1 (2 mg mL−1) MW 500,000 Da 400 μL POPC:POPE:POPG 3:1:1 (10 mg mL−1) MW ~750Da 23.8 μL MSP2N2 (4 mg mL−1) MW 42,400 Da 51.0 μL TRPA1 protein is first equilibrated with the lipids by gently rotating the mixture for 30 min at 4°C, then MSP2N2 is added and the mixture is rotated for an additional 30 min.
While TRPA1 protein is incubating with MSP2N2 and lipids in step 4, prepare two equal aliquots of Bio-Beads (Bio-Rad). For 400 μL of TRPA1/MSP2N2/lipids mix made in steps 4, prepare two aliquots of 40 mg Bio-Beads (100 mg mL−1). Weigh out desired amount of Bio-Beads to 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. Wash the Bio-Beads with TBS then aspirate all remaining liquid. Keep Bio-Beats at 4°C until ready to use in steps 5 and 6.
Initiate detergent removal by transferring the reconstitution mix to one of the freshly washed Bio-bead aliquots, place on a tube inverter at 4°C for 2 hours.
-
Pellet the Bio-beads by spinning the reconstitution mixture at 1000 rpm for 1 minute, then transfer the solution to the second aliquot Bio-beads and rotating at 4°C overnight.
Note: The minimum time tested for the second Bio-beads incubation is 12 hours. It is recommended to incubate 12–16 hours for a complete reconstitution.
Separate Bio-Beads from solution by aspirating all liquid using a 1 ml pipette tip. Take caution not to pipet any Bio-beads into the tip and transfer the solution into a clean 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. Inject the TRPA1/MSP2N2/lipids reconstitution mix into a Superose 6 10/300 column pre-equilibrated with SEC buffer (detergent-free) for SEC analysis. Analyze the chromatogram and conduct SDS-PAGE on the fractions to assess reconstitution efficiency. If the sample behavior is acceptable, collect peak fractions containing nanodisc-reconstituted TRPA1 and prepare cryo-EM grids.
Summary
Obtaining a homogenous, pure protein sample is the key to not only structural studies, but also for a number of functional studies such as activity assays. Outlined above is a method to purify and reconstitute human TRPA1 into lipid nanodiscs, suitable for cryo-EM structural studies. The reproducibility and versality has allowed us to determine several high-resolution structures of TRPA1 in the apo state as well as with covalent ligands bound. Moreover, because the sample is reconstituted into lipid nanodiscs, structures of nanodisc-reconstituted TRPA1 in complex with different ligands has highlighted the potential roles of lipids in TRPA1 gating and TRPA1-related human disease (Suo et al. 2020). We have successfully applied the above methods to similarly produce highly homogenous and well-behaved TRP channels for cryo-EM studies (Yoo et al. 2018, Zubcevic et al. 2019).
Figure 1.

Flowchart of the complete protocol.
Figure 2.

Example results from TRPA1 sample preparation, nanodisc reconstitution and a representative cryo-EM micrograph. A, SEC trace of a TRPA1 sample reconstituted into lipid nanodiscs. The black bar indicates the range of SEC fractions sampled for SDS-PAGE. B, SDS-PAGE of the reconstitution mix prior to SEC, and SEC fractions. The contaminant band appeared in SDS-PAGE is likely to be a certain type of heat shock protein, as we often observe it in other membrane protein expressed in HEK293 cells. C, Representative cryo-EM micrograph of TRPA1-nanodiscs. Sample is imaged at 81,000 X magnification with −5 μm defocus. Representative TRPA1 particles are circled.
Key Resources Table
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Bacterial and Virus Strains | ||
| XL1-Blue | Agilent | 200249 |
| DH10Bac | Thermo Fisher | 10361012 |
| Chemicals, Peptides, and Recombinant Proteins | ||
| Freestyle 293 Expression Medium | Gibco | 12338–026 |
| Fetal Bovine Serum | Gibco | 16000044 |
| Ruthenium Red | Sigma-Aldrich | R2751 |
| Sodium butyrate | Sigma-Aldrich | B5887 |
| ANTI-FLAG M2 Affinity Gel | Sigma-Aldrich | A2220 |
| TCEP-HCl | Thermo Fisher | PG82089 |
| Digitonin | Sigma-Aldrich | D141 |
| InsP6 | Sigma-Aldrich | P8810 |
| POPC | Avanti Polar Lipids | 850457 |
| POPE | Avanti Polar Lipids | 850757 |
| POPG | Avanti Polar Lipids | 840457 |
| Bio-Beads SM-2 | Bio-Rad | 1523920 |
| Critical Commercial Assays | ||
| Superose 6 10/300 GL | GE Healthcare | 17–5172-01 |
| Experimental Models: Cell Lines | ||
| HEK293S GnTI- | ATCC | CRL-3022 |
| SF9 | ATCC | CRL-1711 |
| Recombinant DNA | ||
| pMSP2N2 | Addgene | 29520 |
| hTRPA1 (codon optimized) | Bio Basic | N/A |
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R35NS097241 to S.-Y.L.). We thank Ru-Rong Ji and Zilong Wang for the collaborative functional characterization of TRPA1. We thank the former Lee lab member Lejla Zubcevic, who has contributed to our TRPA1 studies. We thank Justin Fedor for the critical reading and feedback on the manuscript.
References
- Bae Chanhyung, Anselmi Claudio, Kalia Jeet, Jara-Oseguera Andres, Schwieters Charles D, Krepkiy Dmitriy, Lee Chul Won, Kim Eun-Hee, Kim Jae Il, and Faraldo-Gomez Jose D. 2016. “Structural insights into the mechanism of activation of the TRPV1 channel by a membrane-bound tarantula toxin.” Elife 5:e11273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bandell M, Story GM, Hwang SW, Viswanath V, Eid SR, Petrus MJ, Earley TJ, and Patapoutian A. 2004. “Noxious cold ion channel TRPA1 is activated by pungent compounds and bradykinin.” Neuron 41 (6):849–857. doi: Doi 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00150-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berman, Helen, Westbrook John, Feng Zukang, Gilliland Gary, Bhat Talapady N, Weissig Helge, Shindyalov Ilya N, and Bourne Philip E. 2000. “The protein data bank.” Nucleic acids research 28 (1):235–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao E 2020. “Structural mechanisms of transient receptor potential ion channels.” J Gen Physiol 152 (3). doi: 10.1085/jgp.201811998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carragher Bridget, Cheng Yifan, Frost Adam, Glaeser Robert M, Lander Gabriel C, Nogales Eva, and WANG H‐W. 2019. “Current outcomes when optimizing ‘standard’sample preparation for single‐particle cryo‐EM.” Journal of microscopy 276 (1):39–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng Y, Grigorieff N, Penczek PA, and Walz T. 2015. “A primer to single-particle cryo-electron microscopy.” Cell 161 (3):438–449. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao Y, Cao E, Julius D, and Cheng Y. 2016. “TRPV1 structures in nanodiscs reveal mechanisms of ligand and lipid action.” Nature 534 (7607):347–51. doi: 10.1038/nature17964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goehring A, Lee CH, Wang KH, Michel JC, Claxton DP, Baconguis I, Althoff T, Fischer S, Garcia KC, and Gouaux E. 2014. “Screening and large-scale expression of membrane proteins in mammalian cells for structural studies.” Nat Protoc 9 (11):2574–85. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han Q, Liu D, Convertino M, Wang Z, Jiang C, Kim YH, Luo X, Zhang X, Nackley A, Dokholyan NV, and Ji RR. 2018. “miRNA-711 Binds and Activates TRPA1 Extracellularly to Evoke Acute and Chronic Pruritus.” Neuron 99 (3):449–463 e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henriques Sónia Troeira, Deplazes Evelyne, Lawrence Nicole, Cheneval Olivier, Chaousis Stephanie, Inserra Marco, Thongyoo Panumart, King Glenn F, Mark Alan E, and Vetter Irina. 2016. “Interaction of tarantula venom peptide ProTx-II with lipid membranes is a prerequisite for its inhibition of human voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1. 7.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 291 (33):17049–17065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hinman A, Chuang HH, Bautista DM, and Julius D. 2006. “TRP channel activation by reversible covalent modification.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103 (51):19564–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609598103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koivisto A, Jalava N, Bratty R, and Pertovaara A. 2018. “TRPA1 Antagonists for Pain Relief.” Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 11 (4):117. doi: 10.3390/ph11040117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laursen WJ, Anderson EO, Hoffstaetter LJ, Bagriantsev SN, and Gracheva EO. 2015. “Species-specific temperature sensitivity of TRPA1.” Temperature (Austin) 2 (2):214–26. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2014.1000702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu C, Reese R, Vu S, Rouge L, Shields SD, Kakiuchi-Kiyota S, Chen H, Johnson K, Shi YP, Chernov-Rogan T, Greiner DMZ, Kohli PB, Hackos D, Brillantes B, Tam C, Li T, Wang J, Safina B, Magnuson S, Volgraf M, Payandeh J, Zheng J, Rohou A, and Chen J. 2021. “A Non-covalent Ligand Reveals Biased Agonism of the TRPA1 Ion Channel.” Neuron 109:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macpherson LJ, Dubin AE, Evans MJ, Marr F, Schultz PG, Cravatt BF, and Patapoutian A. 2007. “Noxious compounds activate TRPA1 ion channels through covalent modification of cysteines.” Nature 445 (7127):541–5. doi: 10.1038/nature05544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madej MG, and Ziegler CM. 2018. “Dawning of a new era in TRP channel structural biology by cryo-electron microscopy.” Pflugers Arch 470 (2):213–225. doi: 10.1007/s00424-018-2107-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paulsen CE, Armache JP, Gao Y, Cheng Y, and Julius D. 2015. “Structure of the TRPA1 ion channel suggests regulatory mechanisms.” Nature 520 (7548):511–7. doi: 10.1038/nature14367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ritchie TK, Grinkova YV, Bayburt TH, Denisov IG, Zolnerciks JK, Atkins WM, and Sligar SG. 2009. “Chapter 11 - Reconstitution of membrane proteins in phospholipid bilayer nanodiscs.” Methods Enzymol 464:211–31. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)64011-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saotome K, Singh AK, Yelshanskaya MV, and Sobolevsky AI. 2016. “Crystal structure of the epithelial calcium channel TRPV6.” Nature 534 (7608):506–11. doi: 10.1038/nature17975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suo Y, Wang ZL, Zubcevic L, Hsu AL, He QR, Borgnia MJ, Ji RR, and Lee SY. 2020. “Structural Insights into Electrophile Irritant Sensing by the Human TRPA1 Channel.” Neuron 105 (5):882–894. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.11023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor-Clark TE, Ghatta S, Bettner W, and Undem BJ. 2009. “Nitrooleic acid, an endogenous product of nitrative stress, activates nociceptive sensory nerves via the direct activation of TRPA1.” Mol Pharmacol 75 (4):820–9. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.054445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trevisani M, Siemens J, Materazzi S, Bautista DM, Nassini R, Campi B, Imamachi N, Andre E, Patacchini R, Cottrell GS, Gatti R, Basbaum AI, Bunnett NW, Julius D, and Geppetti P. 2007. “4-Hydroxynonenal, an endogenous aldehyde, causes pain and neurogenic inflammation through activation of the irritant receptor TRPA1.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (33):13519–13524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705923104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie Z, and Hu H. 2018. “TRP Channels as Drug Targets to Relieve Itch.” Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 11 (4):100. doi: 10.3390/ph11040100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin Y, and Lee SY. 2020. “Current View of Ligand and Lipid Recognition by the Menthol Receptor TRPM8.” Trends Biochem Sci 45 (9):806–819. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2020.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin Y, Wu M, Hsu AL, Borschel WF, Borgnia MJ, Lander GC, and Lee SY. 2019. “Visualizing structural transitions of ligand-dependent gating of the TRPM2 channel.” Nat Commun 10 (1):1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11733-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoo J, Wu M, Yin Y, Herzik MA Jr., Lander GC, and Lee SY. 2018. “Cryo-EM structure of a mitochondrial calcium uniporter.” Science 361 (6401):506–511. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan P 2019. “Structural biology of thermoTRPV channels.” Cell Calcium 84:102–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2019.102106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao J, Lin King JV, Paulsen CE, Cheng Y, and Julius D. 2020. “Irritant-evoked activation and calcium modulation of the TRPA1 receptor.” Nature 585 (7823):141–145. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2480-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zubcevic L 2020. “TRP Channels, Conformational Flexibility, and the Lipid Membrane.” J Membr Biol 253 (4):299–308. doi: 10.1007/s00232-020-00127-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zubcevic L, Herzik MA Jr., Wu M, Borschel WF, Hirschi M, Song AS, Lander GC, and Lee SY. 2018. “Conformational ensemble of the human TRPV3 ion channel.” Nat Commun 9 (1):4773. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07117-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zubcevic L, Hsu AL, Borgnia MJ, and Lee SY. 2019. “Symmetry transitions during gating of the TRPV2 ion channel in lipid membranes.” Elife 8:e45779. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zubcevic L, Le S, Yang H, and Lee SY. 2018. “Conformational plasticity in the selectivity filter of the TRPV2 ion channel.” Nat Struct Mol Biol 25 (5):405–415. doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0059-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zubcevic L, and Lee SY. 2019. “The role of pi-helices in TRP channel gating.” Curr Opin Struct Biol 58:314–323. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
