Abstract
Background
Time‐restricted feeding (TRF) is a kind of intermittent fasting defined as eating and drinking only during a certain number of hours in a day. It has been suggested that intermittent fasting may improve cardiovascular risk factors. This study evaluated the association of TRF and arterial stiffness, using pulse wave velocity (PWV), pulse wave analysis, and arterial age in metabolic syndrome participants.
Methods
A cohort study was carried out among metabolic syndrome adults who were followed over the Ramadan fasting period (used as a model of TRF since food was only allowed for about 8 h/day). The subjects were divided into Ramadan fasting and Ramadan nonfasting groups. The aortic PWV and central aortic pressure waveform were measured. Central systolic pressure, central pulse pressure, and indices of arterial compliance, such as augmentation pressure and augmentation index (AIx), were determined from waveform analysis.
Results
Ninety‐five adults (31.57% female, age: 45.46 ± 9.10 years) with metabolic syndrome (based on the International Diabetes Federation definition) participated in this study. Ramadan fasting and Ramadan nonfasting groups were including 80 and 15 individuals respectively. A significant reduction was seen in PWV (0.29 m/s), central systolic pressure (4.03 mmHg), central pulse pressure (2.43 mmHg), central augmentation pressure (1.88 mmHg), and central AIx (2.47) in the Ramadan fasting group (p = 0.014, p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.003, and p = 0.036 respectively). There were no significant changes in these indices among the Ramadan nonfasting group.
Conclusions
This study suggested that TRF reduces arterial age and improves arterial stiffness among people with metabolic syndrome. This might be considered a beneficial nutrition strategy for extending healthspan (and perhaps longevity).
Keywords: arterial age, arterial stiffness, metabolic syndrome, pulse wave velocity, time‐restricted feeding
1. INTRODUCTION
As the world's population grows older, human aging and age‐associated diseases become the most significant challenges and burdens for developing and developed countries. 1 Ischemic heart disease and stroke have remained the most common cause of death during the past decade, with 32% of all global deaths and 38% of premature deaths due to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in 2019. 2 It has been shown that substantial lifespan extension is related to delayed or reduced morbidity in most cases, 3 and should first focus on treating age‐related conditions and diseases (not specifically aging). 4
It has been established that metabolic syndrome (defined as the combination of metabolic risk factors, including hypertension, insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, low HDL cholesterol, and hypertriglyceridemia 5 ) increases the risk of atherosclerosis, 6 , 7 and all‐cause mortality. 7 Another risk factor for CVD is vascular aging, associated with mechanical and structural changes in the vascular walls, leading to increase arterial stiffness, 8 which is independently predictive of cardiovascular events, coronary artery disease, and stroke. 8 , 9 Also, high arterial stiffness decreases the compliance of arteries, increases systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure, as well as reduced diastolic blood pressure which leads to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. 10
Pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement is the gold standard method for assessing arterial stiffness in clinical practice, because of its high reproducibility, low cost, and ease to use. 11 It is also one of the earliest indicators of increased CVD risk and can be considered a good predictor of the development of subclinical cardiovascular dysfunction. Arterial stiffness is a significant prognostic factor influencing cardiovascular risk, which dietary habits can modify. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 Perivascular adipose tissue is a fat depot not widely studied yet and has direct and profound effects on arterial stiffening. 16 , 17 , 18
Furthermore, it has been shown that aortic (central) pulse pressure is a better cardiovascular events predictor than brachial pulse pressure. 19 , 20
Lifestyle modifications have been suggested for arterial stiffness prevention and treatment. 21 Fasting, described as a total or partial abstention from all foods or selected prohibited foods over some time, 22 has been suggested as a dietary intervention to slow aging in humans, 4 also cardiovascular risk improvement in metabolic syndrome patients. 22 Ramadan model of Time‐restricted feeding (TRF) is a type of intermittent fasting that comprises eating and drinking on average only for 8−16 h, each day. 22 , 23 Previous studies showed that Ramadan fasting has a beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk factors in moderate and high‐risk populations 24 and no adverse effect on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in treated hypertensive volunteers. 25 , 26 There is not conclusive evidence regarding the association between Ramadan model of TRF and arterial stiffness indices. 27 , 28
This study aimed to evaluate the association of the Ramadan model of TRF and arterial stiffness indices including PWV, pulse wave analysis (PWA) indices, brachial and central blood pressures, and arterial age in volunteers with metabolic syndrome with the hypothesis that arterial stiffness indices and arterial age may be improved after Ramadan fasting.
2. METHODS
A cohort study was conducted in adults with metabolic syndrome from May to June 2017 in Mashhad, Iran. Patient recruitment was done based on Public announcements in offices and clinics of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. The clinical diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in this study was based on the definition of the International Diabetes Federation and Iranian adults' specific waist cut‐off values (Table 1). 5 , 30 Exclusion criteria were patients with a history of cardiac arrhythmias, carotid or aortic valve stenosis, peripheral artery disease, and hypotension.
Table 1.
| Measure | Categorical cut‐off points |
|---|---|
| Waist circumference | >95 cm (men and women) |
| Raised triglycerides | >150 mg/dL (1·7 mmol/L) |
| OR Specific treatment for this lipid abnormality | |
| Reduced HDL‐cholesterol | <40 mg/dL (1·03 mmol/L) in men |
| OR Specific treatment for this lipid abnormality | <50 mg/dL (1·29 mmol/L) in women |
| Raised blood pressure | Systolic ≥ 130 mmHg |
| OR Treatment of previously diagnosed hypertension | Diastolic ≥ 85 mmHg |
| Raised fasting plasma glucose | ≥100 mg/dL (5·6 mmol/L) |
| Fasting plasma glucose | |
| OR Previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes |
Ramadan is the 9th month of the Islamic calendar and Ramadan fasting means abstention from eating, drinking, smoking, and sexual activity from down to sunset. 22 , 23
Subjects were categorized into Ramadan fasting and Ramadan nonfasting groups retrospectively (at the end of Ramadan, based on self‐declaration of the number of fasting days). Fasting for 10 days was considered the minimum acceptable number for the Ramadan fasting group. Individuals who fasted for less than 10 days were considered the Ramadan nonfasting group. The aortic PWV was measured noninvasively from the right carotid and femoral artery pulses using SphygmoCor XCEL System (AtCor Medical). Participants were asked to abstain from eating, drinking, and consuming alcohol, caffeine, or smoking 6 h before the study. Measurements were done after a 15 min rest in a lying position, in a quiet, dry, and thermally comfortable room. 29 Mean arterial age was calculated based on an individual's cfPWV or augmentation index (AIx). 31
Visceral fat area was measured using assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (InBody770; Biospace). Measurements were taken 6 days before and 4 days after Ramadan.
The Kolmogorov−Smirnov test was performed to test the normality of the distribution of the outcome measures. The paired sample t‐test was used to assess the differences between the normally distributed variables before and after Ramadan in the Ramadan fasting and Ramadan nonfasting groups. ANCOVA was used for comparison between groups and before Ramadan measurements considered as covariate.
A p‐value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted in SPSS statistical software (version 16, SPSS Inc.).
3. RESULTS
Overall 102 adults were recruited for the study and seven withdrew because of personal reasons. So, 95 metabolic syndrome volunteers (68% male, mean age of 45.4 ± 9 years) participated in this study, and the average duration of daily fasting was about 16.5 h. Baseline characteristics of patients before and after the Ramadan period are reported in Tables 2 and 3.
Table 2.
Descriptive statistics of gender, age and number of fasting days (N = 95).
| Fasted group (N = 80) | Not fasted group (N = 15) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female (number) | 25 (31.3) | 5 (33.3) | 0.873a |
| Male (number) | 55 (68.8) | 10 (66.7) | |
| Mean age (year) | 45.6 ± 8.9 | 44.7 ± 10.2 | 0.737b |
| Number of fasting days during Ramadan | 26.5 ± 6 | 2.7 ± 3 | <0.001b |
Note: Data was expressed as mean ± sd and n (%).
Chi‐square test;
Independent sample t test.
Table 3.
Effect of intermittent fasting on body weight and body weight changes before and after Ramadan (n = 95).
| Fasted (N = 80) | Not fasted (N = 15) | p Valueb | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before mean ± SD | After mean ± SD | p Valuea | Before mean ± SD | After Mean ± SD | p Valuea | ||
| Weight (kg) | 85.5 ± 13 | 84.0 ± 13 | <0.001 | 88.2 ± 16 | 87.5 ± 16 | 0.112 | 0.028 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 30.7 ± 4 | 30.1 ± 4 | <0.001 | 30.5 ± 4 | 30.3 ± 4 | 0.106 | 0.014 |
| Visceral fat area (cm2) | 145.5 ± 50 | 139.8 ± 50 | <0.001 | 144.1 ± 52 | 139.9 ± 53 | 0.026 | 0.416 |
Paired Sample t‐test.
ANCOVA was used for comparison between groups and before Ramadan measurements considered as covariate.
There was a significant reduction in PWV (0.29 ± 1.02 m/s), arterial age (6.8 ± 17.46 years), central AIx (2.47 ± 10.19), and central augmentation pressure (1.88 ± 5.40 mmHg) after the intermittent fasting period in the Ramadan fasting group (p = 0.014, p = 0.001, p = 0.036, and p = 0.003 respectively) (Table 4, Figure 1). The Ramadan nonfasting group did not significantly change PWV, arterial age, central AIx, and central augmentation pressure (p = 0.50, p = 0.40, p = 0.37, and p = 0.35, respectively) (Table 4).
Table 4.
Effect of intermittent fasting on arterial stiffness in adults with metabolic syndrome (N = 95).
| Fasted group (N = 80) | Not fasted group (N = 15) | p Valueb | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before mean ± SD | After mean ± SD | Change mean ± SD | p Valuea | Before mean ± SD | After mean ± SD | Change mean ± SD | p Valuea | ||
| Mean pulse wave velocity (m/s) | 8.45 ± 1.23 | 8.16 ± 1.11 | −0.29 ± 1.02 | 0.014 | 8.00 ± 1.19 | 8.23 ± 0.96 | 0.23 ± 1.33 | 0.507 | 0.233 |
| Arterial age (year) | 60.54 ± 17.88 | 53.73 ± 19.60 | −6.80 ± 17.46 | 0.001 | 56.27 ± 17.98 | 59.53 ± 20.15 | 3.26 ± 14.80 | 0.407 | 0.061 |
| Central augmentation index (%) | 132.89 ± 11.57 | 130.42 ± 11.11 | −2.47 ± 10.19 | 0.036 | 129.23 ± 10.98 | 131.87 ± 12.27 | 2.63 ± 10.62 | 0.371 | 0.183 |
| Central augmentation pressure (mmHg) | 12.06 ± 5.90 | 10.18 ± 5.71 | −1.88 ± 5.40 | 0.003 | 10.95 ± 7.04 | 12.34 ± 7.80 | 1.39 ± 5.57 | 0.351 | 0.043 |
Paired Sample t‐test.
ANCOVA was used for comparison between groups and before Ramadan measurements considered as covariate.
Figure 1.

Effect of intermittent fasting on arterial stiffness in adults with metabolic syndrome (N = 95).
There was a significant difference between the Ramadan fasting and Ramadan nonfasting groups regarding arterial age and central augmentation pressure changes (p = 0.039 and p = 0.036, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between groups in PWV and central AIx changes after Ramadan fasting (p = 0.334 and p = 0.100, respectively).
A significant reduction in central systolic (−4.03 ± 9.18 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressures (−1.6 ± 6.21 mmHg), central mean blood pressure (−2.85 ± 7.43 mmHg), and central pulse pressure (−2.4 ± 6.41 mmHg) were seen in the Ramadan fasting group (p < 0.001, p = 0.024, p = 0.001, and p = 0.001 respectively) (Table 5).
Table 5.
Effect of intermittent fasting on central and brachial blood pressures in adults with metabolic syndrome (N = 95).
| Fasted (N = 80) | Not fasted (N = 15) | p Valueb | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before mean ± SD | After mean ± SD | Change mean ± SD | p Valuea | Before mean ± SD | After mean ± SD | Change mean ± SD | p Valuea | ||
| Central systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 116.07 ± 13.99 | 112.04 ± 11.47 | −4.03 ± 9.18 | <0.001 | 114.48 ± 11.31 | 114.49 ± 9.81 | 0.005 ± 6.48 | 0.998 | 0.096 |
| Central diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 78.27 ± 10.32 | 76.67 ± 8.97 | −1.59 ± 6.21 | 0.024 | 78.88 ± 8.48 | 78.48 ± 8.56 | −0.40 ± 4.39 | 0.730 | 0.358 |
| Central mean pressure (mmHg) | 93.34 ± 12.16 | 90.49 ± 10.06 | −2.85 ± 7.43 | 0.001 | 93.39 ± 10.14 | 93.07 ± 9.62 | −0.31 ± 5.29 | 0.822 | 0.136 |
| Central pulse pressure (mmHg) | 37.79 ± 7.56 | 35.36 ± 7.25 | −2.43 ± 6.41 | 0.001 | 35.60 ± 7.64 | 36.00 ± 6.46 | 0.40 ± 5.24 | 0.770 | 0.211 |
| Brachial systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 126.05 ± 14.68 | 121.70 ± 12.44 | −4.35 ± 9.69 | <0.001 | 124.53 ± 11.97 | 123.87 ± 9.65 | −0.66 ± 7.61 | 0.740 | 0.163 |
| Brachial diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 77.28 ± 10.28 | 75.61 ± 8.81 | −1.67 ± 6.06 | 0.016 | 77.86 ± 8.08 | 77.26 ± 8.37 | −0.60 ± 4.03 | 0.574 | 0.389 |
| Brachial mean pressure (mmHg) | 93.47 ± 11.33 | 90.97 ± 9.50 | −2.50 ± 6.60 | 0.001 | 93.33 ± 8.86 | 92.67 ± 8.38 | −0.66 ± 5.15 | 0.624 | 0.248 |
| Brachial pulse pressure (mmHg) | 48.76 ± 8.65 | 46.08 ± 8.31 | −2.67 ± 7.35 | 0.002 | 46.66 ± 7.85 | 46.60 ± 6.43 | −0.06 ± 5.16 | 0.961 | 0.316 |
| Heart rate (beat/minute) | 65.95 ± 9.08 | 64.67 ± 9.91 | −1.28 ± 6.19 | 0.070 | 71.46 ± 11.68 | 68.23 ± 8.39 | −3.23 ± 5.16 | 0.044 | 0.587 |
Paired Sample t‐test.
ANCOVA was used for comparison between groups and before Ramadan measurements considered as covariate.
Brachial systolic (−4.35 ± 9.69 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressures (1.67 ± 6.06 mmHg), brachial mean blood pressure (−2.5 ± 6.60 mmHg) and brachial pulse pressure (−2.7 ± 7.35 mmHg) decreased significantly in the Ramadan fasting group (Table 5).
There was a significant difference between the Ramadan fasting and Ramadan nonfasting groups in brachial mean blood pressure changes (p < 0.001), but no significant differences were seen in other central and brachial blood pressure parameters.
4. DISCUSSION
This study showed a significant improvement in arterial stiffness parameters, including PWV, arterial age, AP, AIx, brachial and central pressures in adults with metabolic syndrome after an average of 26.5 days of Ramadan model TRF. It has been reported that each 1 m/s increase in aortic PWV corresponds to an adjusted risk increase of 14% in total cardiovascular events, 15% in cardiovascular mortality, and 15% in all‐cause mortality. 32 This infers that a significant reduction (−0.29 m/s) in PWV after an average of 26.5 days of Ramadan fasting may suggest a 5% improvement in cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all‐cause mortality in metabolic syndrome patients. In our study, an average of 26.5 days of Ramadan fasting reduced arterial age by 7 years, suggesting a 1.8% decrease in the Framingham risk score for CVDs. 33 Seven years of reduction in arterial age regarding Ramadan fasting equals 1 month low, subtherapeutic doses of Fluvastatin or Valsartan therapy to decrease arterial age. 34 Also, it has been reported that for each 10% increase in the AIx, the risk of cardiovascular mortality and all‐cause mortality increases by about 50%, 35 thus the improvement of 3.25% in the central AIx seen in the current study is also suggestive of a reduction in cardiovascular and all‐cause mortality. Moreover, the 4.35 mmHg reduction in central systolic blood pressure due to the Ramadan model of TRF can be considered equivalent to a 10.44% reduction in the risk of stroke. 36
There is scarce evidence regarding arterial stiffness and fasting, particularly in the Ramadan model of TRF. A previous study has demonstrated that Ramadan fasting improves AIx, central systolic, and diastolic blood pressures, but not PWV in hypertensive patients without CKD. 27 Another study showed no significant change in arterial stiffness parameters (including PWV and PWA indices) among 100 healthy overweight and obese men. 28
One previous study assessing central pulse pressure after a fasting period in young, overweight, and obese men reported no significant change. 28 Moreover, previous studies assessing Ramadan fasting and brachial blood pressure reported a considerable reduction or no significant difference in brachial systolic and diastolic blood pressures. 25 , 26
Although there are no randomized control trials regarding Ramadan fasting and cardiovascular outcomes, previous studies have reported a significant improvement in traditional cardiovascular risk factors and Framingham risk score after the Ramadan model of TRF among metabolic syndrome and high‐risk cardiovascular patients. 24
Several mechanisms may explain the improvements seen in arterial stiffness parameters in the current study. These may be driven by aortic blood pressure decline, 31 , 37 calorie restriction, 38 , 39 weight loss, 40 , 41 and visceral fat loss 41 , 42 that were seen in our study population.
It has been reported that increased blood pressure (as a consequence of cellular changes due to increased BP‐related wall stress) has acute and long‐term effects on arterial stiffness. 37 In the fasted group, significant aortic blood pressure decline (−4.03 and −1.59 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressures, respectively) may be a major hemodynamic factor, directly affecting arterial stiffness.
As we previously reported, the Ramadan model of TRF resulted in a 23% restriction in energy intake and a reduction in total physical activity scores during the fasting period, leading to 1.81% weight loss and 3.93% visceral fat loss in our study population. 43 Calorie restriction itself has protective effects on arterial stiffness, preserves endothelial function and collagen–elastin balance, 44 reduces arterial oxidative stress and inflammation, 44 , 45 , 46 and increases nitric oxide bioavailability. 45 , 46 It has been reported that a 30% reduction in calorie intake for 12 weeks, without any increase in physical activity, improves artery endothelium‐dependent dilatation 47 and recurrence of vascular stiffness 41 in overweight and obese adults. the improvement in endothelial function in these studies was independent of age 47 and associated with the rate of abdominal adiposity reduction. 41
Changes in the elastic content of the arterial wall, 41 improved nitric oxide bioavailability, decreased sympathetic neuronal activity, and improvements in arterial stiffness‐associated factors have been observed following weight loss. 38
Reduction of visceral fat by using lifestyle modification has been introduced as a practical strategy to improve obesity‐associated cardiovascular risk factors 48 , 49 , 50 and prevention of acute cardiovascular events 48 , 49 in patients with metabolic syndrome. Visceral fat reduction (3.93%) in the current study can lead to improvements in the pathological role of abdominal fat, 51 including dysfunctional adipocytes, 49 hypoadiponectinemia, 49 predisposing factors of Insulin resistance, proinflammatory metabolites, and other hormones and metabolites associated with hypertension and fibrinolysis disorders, 52 consequently improvement in arterial stiffness indices. This diet also has an influence on gut microbiota leading to beneficial effects on obesity prevention. 53
The results of this study can help to better understand the effects of Ramadan fasting as a lifestyle modification on atherosclerosis indicators in people with metabolic syndrome. The results of this study and previous studies 23 , 24 (with the improvement of cardiovascular risk factors after Ramadan fasting) can help patients and clinicians evaluate Ramadan fasting's benefits and drawbacks to make decisions about it.
This study has several strengths and limitations. This is the first study to assess the effects of the Ramadan modal of TRF on detailed arterial stiffness indices, arterial age, or central blood pressure changes among metabolic syndrome patients. The inclusion of a Ramadan nonfasting group is a further strength of this study. This study is limited due to the small number of individuals in the Ramadan nonfasting group. It was impossible to randomize subjects into Ramadan fasting and not fasting groups due to ethical and religious reasons. So, any causality cannot be determined due to the study design. Although the groups were classified retrospectively, based on self‐declaration of the number of fasting days, there was a difference in the male‐to‐female ratio between the two groups. The outcomes evaluated are outcomes surrogated from clinical outcomes so that ideally future studies should evaluate clinical outcomes. A change at the end of Ramadan does not imply that this change will be maintained over time and will have an impact on clinical outcomes.
5. CONCLUSIONS
This study suggested that the Ramadan model of TRF may be considered a lifestyle strategy for improving arterial stiffness, arterial age, and blood pressure in people with metabolic syndrome. Also, it can be suggested that this strategy with less weight loss (compared to calorie restriction interventions) can be associated with arterial stiffness improvements.
Further studies are needed, however, preferably randomized controlled trials, to confirm these findings.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Maryam Alinezhad‐Namaghi: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; project administration; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. Saeid Eslami: Conceptualization; formal analysis; methodology; software; supervision; writing—review and editing. Mohsen Nematy: Conceptualization; methodology; writing—review and editing. Reza Rezvani: Conceptualization; investigation; writing—review and editing. Adeleh Khoshnasab: Investigation; writing—review and editing. Shokoofeh Bonakdaran: Methodology; writing—review and editing. Elena Philippou: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing. Abdolreza Norouzy: Conceptualization; funding acquisition; project administration; resources; supervision; writing—review and editing.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ETHICS STATEMENT
This study was conducted following the guidelines laid down in the Helsinki Declaration. The Research Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences approved all procedures on human volunteers (approval code of IR.MUMS.fm.REC.1395.494). All subjects completed the written informed consent before the study.
TRANSPARENCY STATEMENT
The lead author Abdolreza Norouzy affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study is part of a Ph.D. thesis submitted by Maryam Alinezhad‐Namaghi (No. 950766), funded by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran. This study was funded by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Project Number:95766
Alinezhad‐Namaghi M, Eslami S, Nematy M, et al. Association of time‐restricted feeding, arterial age, and arterial stiffness in adults with metabolic syndrome. Health Sci Rep. 2023;6:e1385. 10.1002/hsr2.1385
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division . World population prospects 2019: ten key findings. 2019.
- 2. World Health Organisation . Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) fact sheet [updated 11 June 2021]. Accessed February 9, 2022. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/
- 3. Fontana L, Partridge L, Longo VD. Extending healthy life span‐‐from yeast to humans. Science. 2010;328(5976):321‐326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Longo VD, Antebi A, Bartke A, et al. Interventions to slow aging in humans: are we ready? Aging cell. 2015;14(4):497‐510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Azizi F, Hadaegh F, Khalili D, et al. Appropriate definition of metabolic syndrome among Iranian adults: report of the Iranian national committee of obesity. Arch Iran Med. 2010;13(5):426‐428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American heart Association/National heart, lung, and blood institute scientific statement. Circulation. 2005;112(17):2735‐2752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kaur J. A comprehensive review on metabolic syndrome. Cardiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:1‐21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 8. Thijssen DHJ, Carter SE, Green DJ. Arterial structure and function in vascular ageing: are you as old as your arteries? J Physiol. 2016;594(8):2275‐2284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ben‐Shlomo Y, Spears M, Boustred C, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction. JACC. 2014;63(7):636‐646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. O'Rourke MF, Staessen JA, Vlachopoulos C, Duprez D, Plante GE. Clinical applications of arterial stiffness; definitions and reference values. Am J Hypertens. 2002;15(5):426‐444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Van Bortel LM, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, et al. Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid‐femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens. 2012;30(3):445‐448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Stanek A, Grygiel‐Górniak B, Brożyna‐Tkaczyk K, Myśliński W, Cholewka A, Zolghadri S. The influence of dietary interventions on arterial stiffness in overweight and obese subjects. Nutrients. 2023;15(6):1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Gómez‐Sánchez L, Rodríguez‐Sánchez E, Ramos R, et al. The association of dietary intake with arterial stiffness and vascular ageing in a population with intermediate cardiovascular Risk‐A MARK study. Nutrients. 2022;14(2):244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Starzak M, Stanek A, Jakubiak GK, Cholewka A, Cieślar G. Arterial stiffness assessment by pulse wave velocity in patients with metabolic syndrome and its components: is it a useful tool in clinical practice? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(16):10368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Gomez‐Sanchez L, Garcia‐Ortiz L, Patino‐Alonso MC, et al. Association of metabolic syndrome and its components with arterial stiffness in caucasian subjects of the MARK study: a cross‐sectional trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15(1):148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Fleenor BS, Carlini NA, Ouyang A, Harber MP. Perivascular adipose tissue‐mediated arterial stiffening in aging and disease: an emerging translational therapeutic target? Pharmacol Res. 2022;178:106150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Stanek A, Brożyna‐Tkaczyk K, Myśliński W. The role of Obesity‐Induced perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) dysfunction in vascular homeostasis. Nutrients. 2021;13(11):3843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Xia N, Li H. The role of perivascular adipose tissue in obesity‐induced vascular dysfunction. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174(20):3425‐3442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, et al. Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the strong heart study. Hypertension. 2007;50(1):197‐203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, O'Rourke MF, Safar ME, Baou K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all‐cause mortality with central haemodynamics: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(15):1865‐1871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Tanaka H, Safar M. Influence of lifestyle modification on arterial stiffness and wave reflections. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18(1):137‐144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Trepanowski JF, Bloomer RJ. The impact of religious fasting on human health. Nutr J. 2010;9:57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Rothschild J, Hoddy KK, Jambazian P, Varady KA. Time‐restricted feeding and risk of metabolic disease: a review of human and animal studies. Nutr Res. 2014;72(5):308‐318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Nematy M, Alinezhad‐Namaghi M, Rashed MM, et al. Effects of Ramadan fasting on cardiovascular risk factors: a prospective observational study. Nutr J. 2012;11:69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Alinezhad‐Namaghi M, Salehi M. Effects of Ramadan fasting on blood pressure in hypertensive patients: a systematic review. J Fast Health. 2016;4(1):17‐21. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Alinezhad Namaghi M, Hasanzadeh Dalooe M, Khoshnasab AH, et al. Effects of Ramadan fasting on ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients. J Fast Health. 2014;2(1):1‐6. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Eldeeb A, Mahmoud M, Ibrahim A, Yousef E, Sabry A. Effect of Ramadan fasting on arterial stiffness parameters among Egyptian hypertensive patients with and without chronic kidney disease. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplan. 2020;31(3):582‐588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sezen Y, Altiparmak IH, Erkus ME, et al. Effects of Ramadan fasting on body composition and arterial stiffness. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66(12):1522‐1527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Townsend RR, Wilkinson IB, Schiffrin EL, et al. Recommendations for improving and standardizing vascular research on arterial stiffness: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Hypertension. 2015;66(3):698‐722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Alberti KGM, Zimmet P, Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome—a new worldwide definition. Lancet. 2005;366(9491):1059‐1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Butlin M, Qasem A. Large artery stiffness assessment using SphygmoCor technology. Pulse (Basel, Switzerland). 2017;4(4):180‐192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and All‐Cause mortality with arterial stiffness. JACC. 2010;55(13):1318‐1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. D'Agostino RB Sr., Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the framingham heart study. Circulation. 2008;117(6):743‐753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Janic M, Lunder M. A low‐dose combination of fluvastatin and valsartan: a new “drug” and a new approach for decreasing the arterial age. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:235709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. London M, Blacher J, Pannier B, Guérin AP, Marchais SJ, Safar ME. Arterial wave reflections and survival in end‐stage renal failure. Hypertension. 2001;38(3):434‐438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990‐2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. The Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224‐2260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Papaioannou TG, Karatzi K, Psaltopoulou T, Tousoulis D. Arterial ageing: major nutritional and life‐style effects. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;37:162‐163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Zieman SJ, Melenovsky V, Kass DA. Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and therapy of arterial stiffness. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25(5):932‐943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. LaRocca TJ, Martens CR, Seals DR. Nutrition and other lifestyle influences on arterial aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;39:106‐119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Petersen K, Blanch N, Keogh J, Clifton P. Weight loss, dietary intake and pulse wave velocity. Pulse. 2015;3(2):134‐140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Dengo AL, Dennis EA, Orr JS, et al. Arterial destiffening with weight loss in overweight and obese middle‐aged and older adults. Hypertension. 2010;55(4):855‐861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Karatzis E, Papaioannou TG, Aznaouridis K, et al. Acute effects of caffeine on blood pressure and wave reflections in healthy subjects: should we consider monitoring central blood pressure? Int J Cardiol. 2005;98(3):425‐430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Alinezhad Namaghi M, Eslami S, Nematy M, et al. Intermittent fasting during Ramadan and its effects in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Nutr Today. 2019;54(4):159‐164. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Donato AJ, Walker AE, Magerko KA, et al. Life‐long caloric restriction reduces oxidative stress and preserves nitric oxide bioavailability and function in arteries of old mice. Aging cell. 2013;12(5):772‐783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Seals DR, Kaplon RE, Gioscia‐Ryan RA, LaRocca TJ. You're only as old as your arteries: translational strategies for preserving vascular endothelial function with aging. Physiology (Bethesda. Physiology. 2014;29(4):250‐264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Ungvari Z, Parrado‐Fernandez C, Csiszar A, de Cabo R. Mechanisms underlying caloric restriction and lifespan regulation: implications for vascular aging. Circ Res. 2008;102(5):519‐528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Pierce GL, Beske SD, Lawson BR, et al. Weight loss alone improves conduit and resistance artery endothelial function in young and older overweight/obese adults. Hypertension. 2008;52(1):72‐79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ryo M. Clinical significance of visceral adiposity assessed by computed tomography: a Japanese perspective. World J Radiol. 2014;6(7):409‐416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Kishida K, Funahashi T, Matsuzawa Y, Shimomura I. Visceral adiposity as a target for the management of the metabolic syndrome. Ann Med. 2012;44(3):233‐241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Després JP, Pascot A, Lemieux I. [Risk factors associated with obesity: a metabolic perspective]. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2000;61 Suppl 6(suppl 6):31‐38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Liu J, Fox CS, Hickson DA, et al. Impact of abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue on cardiometabolic risk factors: the Jackson heart study. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2010;95(12):5419‐5426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Vega GL. Obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Minerva Endocrinol. 2004;29(2):47‐54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Bagheri S, Zolghadri S, Stanek A. Beneficial effects of anti‐inflammatory diet in modulating gut microbiota and controlling obesity. Nutrients. 2022;14(19):3985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
