Abstract
Free-living amoebae (FLA) are widely dispersed in the environment, can cause opportunistic and non-opportunistic infections in humans and other animals. The aim of the present study was characterize FLA obtained from air-conditioners of a public hospital in the city of Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. Fifty-four dust samples were collected of air conditioners, and were inoculated on 1.5% non-nutrient agar, overlaid with layers of Escherichia coli. Subsequently the isolates were axenised in PYG growth medium. The morphological and molecular characterization of the isolates was performed, as well as the tolerance (physiological) assays were used to evaluate the pathogenic potential. The results revealed the presence of FLA in 42 (77.8%) of the collected samples. Of these, 39 (92.9%) axenic isolates of FLA were obtained for morphological and genotypic studies. All the isolates characterized belong to the genus Acanthamoeba. Nineteen (48.7%) isolates belong to the genotype T4, 16 (41.0%) to the T5 genotype and 4 (10.3%) to genotype T11. Seven (18.0%) isolates were considered potentially pathogenic in tolerance assays. These findings require attention, considering the isolation environment and immunocompromised characteristics of many hospitalized patients.
Key words: Acanthamoeba, air-conditioners, free-living amoebae, hospital
Introduction
Air conditioning systems can harbour bacteria, fungi, viruses and protozoa, such as Acanthamoeba spp. (Ross et al., 2004; Ooi et al., 2017). These microorganisms may remain in these locations for a long time and be dispersed in the environment through air currents (Silva et al., 2013). The exchange of air in indoor environments does not always occur in a satisfactory way which can favour the development of microorganisms, which can eventually affect humans causing infections (Graudenz and Dantas, 2007). Indoor air quality control plays an important role in preventing infections at these sites, particularly important in hospital settings, since immunocompromised individuals are more susceptible to infections (Alves et al., 2012; Santana and Fortuna, 2012).
The critical care areas of hospitals are those that show a greater probability of transmitting hospital infection, either through invasive procedures or the presence of immunocompromised patients, such as in surgical centres (SCs), intensive care unit (ICU) haemodialysis rooms, chemotherapy, transplantation, among others. The transmission occurs through direct contact with the hospital staff, from one patient to another through fomites (objects such as gloves, tools and utensils) and the hospital ventilation system (Afonso et al., 2004; Leung and Chan, 2006; Silva et al., 2013).
Acanthamoeba spp. are among the most common protozoa in nature and identified as agents of granulomatous amoebic encephalitis (GAE), cutaneous lesions, pulmonary and kidney infections, primarily in immunocompromised patient and Acanthamoeba keratitis in immunocompetent individuals (Trabelsi et al., 2012). Furthermore, Acanthamoeba spp. have been described as vehicles of pathogenic microorganisms including Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium spp. and Pseudomonas spp. (Marciano-Cabral et al., 2010; Maschio et al., 2015; Balczun and Scheid, 2017).
Species of Acanthamoeba have two stages: trophozoite, metabolically active form and cyst, stage of dormancy. Identification of Acanthamoeba at the genus level is relatively easy due to the presence of characteristics such as acanthopodia in trophozoites and double wall of cysts (Visvesvara, 2013). Pussard and Pons (1977) divided the genus into three groups according to the size and shape of cysts; however, this classification is uncertain because the morphology of the cysts can modify according to the culture conditions. The most accepted methodology for classifying Acanthamoeba spp. based on the smaller subunit sequences of the 18S rDNA gene, so that the genus can be divided into genotypes, which would correspond to species. Each genotype exhibits 5% or more of divergent sequences between different genotypes (Schroeder et al., 2001; Trabelsi et al., 2012). Currently, Acanthamoeba spp. differentiate into 21 genotypes (T1–T21) (Corsaro et al., 2015; 2017). Several studies use tolerance assays to predict the pathogenic potential of Acanthamoeba environmental isolates (Khan et al., 2002; Al-Herrawy et al., 2013).
Due to the opportunistic nature of Acanthamoeba spp. and its possible role as a reservoir of pathogens of importance in health services infections, the monitoring of this protozoan in hospital environments becomes important and could be used as a quality biomarker in hospitals for the improvement of air quality in hospital settings, because in these places people are more debilitated and susceptible to infections and cysts of Acanthamoeba spp. are resistant to several disinfection systems, remaining in the environment for years, becoming a source of dissemination of pathogens (Ooi et al., 2017). In this sense, the present study investigated the occurrence of FLA in air-conditioners of a public hospital in the city of Florianópolis, SC, Brazil, with a particular focus on isolation and genotyping of Acanthamoeba isolates.
Materials and methods
Samples
Fifty-four dust samples were collected from filters, flaps and diffuser of air conditioners of fifteen environments of a public hospital in the city of Florianópolis, SC, Brazil, between March 2014 and March 2015. The collection environments were: chemotherapy unit (CU), emergency (EM), gynecology (GN), haemodialysis unit (HU), ICU, medical clinic I (MCI), medical clinic II (MCII), obstetrical centre (OC), ophthalmology (OPT), outpatient surgical centre (OSC), paediatrics (PED), SC, surgical clinic I (SCI), surgical clinic II (SCII) and sterilization room (ST). Samples were collected using sterile swabs, which were placed in contact with 10 mL of Page saline solution (2.5 mm NaCl, 1 mm KH2PO4, 0.5 mm Na2HPO4, 40 mm CaCl2 and 20 mm MgSO4) for 30 min to promote the detachment of amoebic forms, when presents. After, the samples were centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min, the supernatant was discarded and the pellet was resuspended in 200 μL of Page saline solution.
Isolation of free-living amoebae
The suspension obtained from each pellet was inoculated in the centre of 1.5% non-nutrient agar (NNA) plates, overlaid with layers of Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) previously heat-inactivated (for 2 h at 56°C). The plates were sealed with Parafilm® and incubated at 30°C for up to 25 days. Three plates were prepared for each dust sampled. Each plate was examined daily under optical microscopy (at 100×) to verify the presence of amoebic forms. When the presence of cysts or trophozoites was observed, it was performed subculture from the transference of a small piece of agar containing the amoebic forms to a new plate in order to isolate it from other microorganisms. Subsequently the isolates were axenised in PYG growth medium [0.75% (w/v) proteose peptone, 0.75% (w/v) yeast extract and 1.5% (w/v) glucose with antibiotics] and incubated at 30°C. When necessary, PYG medium supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum was used to promote amoebic development.
Morphological studies
The cysts and trophozoites of the FLA isolated from dust of air conditioners were morphologically characterized (Pussard and Pons, 1977; Page, 1988).
The size of the amoebic forms was estimated using calibrated ocular micrometre. For each isolate, 10 cysts and 10 trophozoites were measured. The results were expressed as mean ± s.d..
Molecular identification of isolates
Extraction of total DNA from each isolate (containing 106 trophozoites/mL) was performed using the QIAamp® DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed with the genus-specific primers JDP1 and JDP2 according to Schroeder et al. (2001). The positive control included DNA from the strain Acanthamoeba castellanii Neff (ATCC 30010) and the negative control as a substitute for DNA template included DNA free water. The amplicons were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel, stained with 1μg/mL ethidium bromide and observed under a UV-light transilluminator. The PCR products were purified using the PureLink® PCR Purification Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purified amplicons were sequenced in both senses using the amplification primers and BigDye® sequencing kit in an ABI 3730 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, EUA).
To determine the genotypes, sequencing data was aligned with Acanthamoeba genotype sequences available in the GenBank database based on the DF3 using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) program of the US National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) to search for the most similar sequences. The sequences obtained in this study were deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers MF076628 to MF076666. Sequence alignments were performed using CLUSTAL W for pairwise alignments and phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms (Kumar et al., 2018) using the neighbour joining method, with the bootstrap based on 1000 random replicates.
Tolerance (physiological) assays
Thermotolerance and osmotolerance assays were performed as previously described (Caumo et al., 2009). Briefly, for the osmotolerance assay 103 trophozoites were inoculated onto 1.5% NNA plates containing mannitol 1.0 M, each with overlaid with layers of heat-killed E. coli (ATCC 25922). NNA plates under the same conditions without the addition of mannitol were used as a control. All plates were incubated at 30°C for 10 days, after this incubation period, growth was evaluated in optical microscopy (at 100×). For this, the number of cysts or trophozoites visualized in about 20 mm from the inoculum site (previously demarcated) of the each plate, in five microscope fields were counted and classified, with counts of zero (−), 1–15 (+), 16–30 (++), >30 (+++).
For the thermotolerance assay, 103 trophozoites were inoculated onto 1.5% NNA plates, each with overlaid with layers of heat-killed E. coli. Plates were incubated at 30 and 40°C for 10 days. The plates, submitted to 30°C, were used as control in growth assessment. The growth evaluation after the incubation period was done as in the osmotolerance assay. All assays were carried out in triplicates.
The isolates were classified into three groups according to their growth in the tolerance tests. Isolates that were able to develop in the hyperosmolar medium and the temperature of 40°C were classified as potentially pathogenic. Isolates that developed in one of the tests were classified as being of low pathogenic potential and when it was not able to develop against none of the adverse conditions were classified as probably non-pathogenic.
Results
Of the 54 dust samples obtained from air conditioners of hospital environments, 42 (77.8%) were positive for FLA. Of these three (7.2%) were not able to develop in axenic medium. Therefore, 39 (92.9%) axenic isolates of FLA were obtained for morphological and genotypic studies. All the amoeba isolates in this study were identified morphologically (Table 1) as belonging to the genus Acanthamoeba. The trophozoites presented acanthopodia, and a nucleus with well-defined central nucleolus (Fig. 1a). Thirty-seven isolates presented characteristics compatible with group II (Fig. 1b), and two isolates to morphological group III. No isolate presented group I characteristics. All the measurements of cysts and trophozoites presented size expected for genus according to Pussard and Pons (1977) and Page (1988).
Table 1.
Morphological identification of Acanthamoeba isolates obtained from dust from air conditioners of a public hospital in Florianópolis
| Hospital environment | Isolated | Mean (s.d.) diameter μm | Morphological group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trophozoite | Cyst | |||
| CU | CU – Chemotherapy (CF) | 33.8 (3.4) | 13.8 (1.3) | II |
| CU – Doctor's office 01 (D) | 30.2 (2.2) | 17.0 (1.6) | II | |
| CU – Doctor's office 02 (D) | 32.0 (2.6) | 15.5 (2,0) | II | |
| CU – Procedures room (D) | 33.5 (1.8) | 14.5 (1.6) | II | |
| EM | EM – Left Ward (F) | 35.2 (1.9) | 16.8 (1.7) | II |
| EM – Right Ward (F) | 40.3 (2.2) | 17.5 (1.6) | II | |
| EM – Resuscitation room (F) | 32.0 (2.7) | 17.5 (1.7) | II | |
| GN | GN – Doctor's office 02 (Fp) | 32.0 (1.0) | 15.8 (1.6) | II |
| GN – Doctor's office 02 (F) | 33.6 (1.8) | 17.0 (1.6) | II | |
| GN – Room 202 (Fp) | 28.7 (1.8) | 16.0 (1.3) | II | |
| GN – Room 202 (F) | 31.8 (1.2) | 16.3 (1.3) | II | |
| HU | HU – Central procedure room 1 (D) | 36.3 (1,3) | 19.0 (1.3) | II |
| HU – Central procedure room 2 (D) | 37.0 (2.0) | 19.5 (1.7) | II | |
| HU – Room of repose (F) | 36.0 (2.1) | 18.3 (1.2) | II | |
| ICU | ICU – Intensive care unit (CF) | 26.3 (2.7) | 18.3 (1.2) | II |
| MCI | MCI – 309 (F) | 28.0 (1.0) | 16.5 (1.3) | II |
| MCI – 310 (Fp) | 27.2 (2.6) | 15.5 (2.0) | III | |
| MCI – 310 (F) | 29.6 (2.0) | 18.8 (1,4) | II | |
| MCI – 311 (Fp) | 28.0 (1.0) | 15.5 (1.0) | II | |
| MCI – 311 (F) | 30.0 (1.2) | 16.8 (1.2) | II | |
| MCI – Medical clinic I (CF) | 33.5 (1.1) | 16.5 (1.3) | II | |
| MCII | MCII – 314 (Fp) | 30.3 (1.4) | 17.5 (1.6) | II |
| MCII – 324 (Fp) | 32.6 (2.3) | 19.3 (1.7) | II | |
| OC | OC – Obstetrical centre (CF) | 34.5 (1.6) | 15.0 (1.7) | II |
| OPT | OPT – Doctor's office 02 (F) | 33.3 (2.1) | 16.0 (1.3) | II |
| OPT – Waiting room (F) | 32.0 (2.0) | 17.5 (1.7) | II | |
| OSC | OSC – Doctor's office 01 (F) | 34.5 (2.6) | 18.5 (2.1) | II |
| OSC – Doctor's office 04 (F) | 30.0 (1.6) | 16.3 (1.7) | II | |
| PED | PED – Special care room (Fp) | 27.3 (1.8) | 16.6 (1.6) | II |
| PED – Special care room (F) | 28.8 (1,3) | 15.5 (1.0) | II | |
| SC | SC – Roon 01 (D) | 29.8 (1.9) | 14.5 (2.0) | II |
| SC – Roon 02 (D) | 29.0 (1.7) | 17.0 (2.0) | II | |
| SC – Roon 04 (D) | 30.0 (1.7) | 14.3 (1.2) | II | |
| SCI | SCI – Bed 406 (D) | 30.8 (2.1) | 15.5 (1.6) | II |
| SCI – Bed 410 (D) | 29.0 (2.1) | 14.6 (2.2) | II | |
| SCI – Procedure room (D) | 29.6 (1.6) | 17.3 (1.8) | II | |
| SCII | SCII – Curative room (D) | 28.8 (2.4) | 15.3 (0.8) | II |
| ST | ST – Preparation room (F) | 27.3 (1,8) | 16.9 (1.2) | II |
| ST – Storage room (F) | 37.3 (1,8) | 19.5 (2.0) | III | |
Central filter (CF); diffuser (D); filter (F); flaps (Fp).
Fig. 1.
Trophozoite of Acanthamoeba spp. presenting acanthopodia, and a nucleus with well-defined central nucleolus (a) and cyst compatible with group II (b). The bars represent 10 μm.
The PCR using genus-specific primers (JDP1 and JDP2) confirmed that the 39 isolates from the study belonged to the genus Acanthamoeba. The expected amplification product (ASA.S1 18S rDNA) of ~500 bp was observed (Fig. 2). Sequencing of PCR products revealed that 19 (48.7%) isolates belonged to the genotype T4, 16 (41.0%) to the T5 genotype and 4 (10.3%) to genotype T11 (Table 2) when compared to the reference sequences deposited at GenBank. The percentage of identity between the sequences of this study and those used as reference ranged from 97 to 100%.
Fig. 2.
Neighbour-joining 18S rDNA tree of genotype Acanthamoeba spp. (MEGA X program). Test isolates including reference strains representing T1–T20 genotypes. Numbers at the nodes are percentage-bootstrapping values on 1000 replicates. Balamuthia mandrillaris was used as the outgroup. Bar 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Table 2.
Genotypic identification of Acanthamoeba isolates obtained from dust from air conditioners of a public hospital in Florianópolis
| Hospital environment | Site of isolation | GenBank accession no. | Genotype | Reference sequences | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GenBank accession no. | Identity (%) | ||||
| CU | CU –Chemotherapy (CF) | MF076646 | T4 | KF733253 | 99 |
| CU – Doctor's office 01 (D) | MF076629 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 | |
| CU – Doctor's office 02 (D) | MF076636 | T4 | U07409 | 98 | |
| CU – Procedures room (D) | MF076641 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 | |
| EM | EM – Left Ward (F) | MF076649 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 |
| EM – Right Ward (F) | MF076633 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 | |
| EM – Resuscitation room (F) | MF076653 | T5 | KF962049 | 99 | |
| GN | GN – Doctor's office 02 (Fp) | MF076638 | T4 | U07409 | 98 |
| GN – Doctor's office 02 (F) | MF076665 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 | |
| GN – Room 202 (Fp) | MF076647 | T4 | U07409 | 98 | |
| GN – Room 202 (F) | MF076664 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 | |
| HU | HU – Central procedure room 1 (D) | MF076660 | T11 | KT892890 | 99 |
| HU – Central procedure room 2 (D) | MF076648 | T11 | KT892890 | 99 | |
| HU – Room for resting (F) | MF076655 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 | |
| ICU | ICU – Intensive-care unit (CF) | MF076666 | T11 | KT892890 | 99 |
| MCI | MCI – 309 (F) | MF076659 | T4 | U07409 | 99 |
| MCI – 310 (Fp) | MF076661 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 | |
| MCI – 310 (F) | MF076643 | T4 | KF733263 | 100 | |
| MCI – 311 (Fp) | MF076651 | T4 | U07409 | 100 | |
| MCI – 311 (F) | MF076632 | T4 | KF733263 | 100 | |
| MCI – Medical clinic I (CF) | MF076657 | T11 | KT892890 | 99 | |
| MCII | MCII – 314 (Fp) | MF076644 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 |
| MCII – 324 (Fp) | MF076631 | T4 | KF733263 | 100 | |
| OC | OC – Obstetrical centre (CF) | MF076637 | T4 | U07409 | 97 |
| OPT | OPT – Doctor's office 02 (F) | MF076628 | T4 | U07409 | 99 |
| OPT – Waiting room (F) | MF076630 | T4 | KF733253 | 99 | |
| OSC | OSC – Doctor's office 01 (F) | MF076639 | T4 | KF733253 | 97 |
| OSC – Doctor's office 04 (F) | MF076634 | T4 | KT735332 | 100 | |
| PED | PED – Special care room (Fp) | MF076642 | T4 | U07409 | 99 |
| PED – Special care room (F) | MF076654 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 | |
| SC | SC – Room 01 (D) | MF076645 | T4 | U07409 | 98 |
| SC – Room 02 (D) | MF076650 | T4 | KF733253 | 98 | |
| SC – Room 04 (D) | MF076662 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 | |
| SCI | SCI – Bed 406 (D) | MF076635 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 |
| SCI – Bed 410 (D) | MF076640 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 | |
| SCI – Procedure room (D) | MF076656 | T4 | KT735332 | 100 | |
| SCII | SCII – Curative room (D) | MF076658 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 |
| ST | ST – Preparation room (F) | MF076652 | T4 | KF733253 | 99 |
| ST – Storage room (F) | MF076663 | T5 | KF962049 | 100 | |
Central filter (CF); diffuser (D); filter (F); flaps (Fp).
The sequences from Acanthamoeba spp. isolates were used to construct the phylogenetic tree to illustrate the relationships between the isolates obtained and reference sequences of Acanthamoeba genotypes T1–T20 retrieved from GenBank. The relationships among these isolates were examined by using the neighbour-joining method as showed in Fig. 2. The tree showed that 19 isolates are strictly related with Acanthamoeba T4 genotype chosen as references with 98% of identity, 16 isolates T5 genotype with 100% of identity with the T5 sequence references. Four of the 39 isolates analysed showed a strict correspondence with the deposited sequences for the genotype T11, with 100% of identity. The association of obtained isolates in this study with individual genotypes was supported by significant bootstrap values (Fig. 2).
Of the 39 isolates of Acanthamoeba submitted to the osmo and thermotolerance assays, seven (18.0%) isolates were considered potentially pathogenic, because it had concomitant growth in hyperosmolar medium and at elevated temperature of 40°C. Isolates that developed only at elevated temperature 25 (64.1%) and only in hyperosmolar 2 (5.2%) were classified as low pathogenic potential. Among the isolates, 5 (12.8%) presented no growth at 1.0 M mannitol and at 40°C and were considered probably non-pathogenic isolates (Table 3).
Table 3.
In vitro growth of the Acanthamoeba isolates in the osmotolerance and thermotolerance assays
| Hospital environment | Isolated | Osmotolerance | Thermotolerance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth* 1.0 M mannitol | Growth* 40°C | ||
| CU | CU – Chemotherapy (CF) | – | ++ |
| CU – Doctor's office 01 (D) | – | +++ | |
| CU – Doctor's office 02 (D) | – | +++ | |
| CU – Procedures room (D) | – | + | |
| EM | EM – Left Ward (F) | – | ++ |
| EM – Right Ward (F) | ++ | +++ | |
| EM – Resuscitation room (F) | – | +++ | |
| GN | GN – Doctor's office 02 (Fp) | – | +++ |
| GN – Doctor's office 02 (F) | – | ++ | |
| GN – Room 202 (Fp) | – | + | |
| GN – Room 202 (F) | – | – | |
| HU | HU – Central procedure room 1 (D) | – | +++ |
| HU – Central procedure room 2 (D) | – | ++ | |
| HU – Room for resting (F) | – | ++ | |
| ICU | ICU – Intensive-care unit (CF) | – | + |
| MCI | MCI – 309 (F) | – | ++ |
| MCI – 310 (Fp) | – | +++ | |
| MCI – 310 (F) | + | – | |
| MCI – 311 (Fp) | – | – | |
| MCI – 311 (F) | – | +++ | |
| MCI – Medical clinic I (CF) | – | – | |
| MCII | MCII – 314 (Fp) | – | ++ |
| MCII – 324 (Fp) | + | – | |
| OC | OC – Obstetrical centre (CF) | – | – |
| OPT | OPT – Doctor's office 02 (F) | +++ | + |
| OPT – Waiting room (F) | +++ | ++ | |
| OSC | OSC – Doctor's office 01 (F) | + | +++ |
| OSC – Doctor's office 04 (F) | – | – | |
| PED | PED – Special care room (Fp) | – | + |
| PED – Special care room (F) | – | +++ | |
| SC | SC – Room 01 (D) | – | +++ |
| SC – Room 02 (D) | – | ++ | |
| SC – Room 04 (D) | +++ | ++ | |
| SCI | SCI – Bed 406 (D) | ++ | + |
| SCI – Bed 410 (D) | – | ++ | |
| SCI – Procedure room (D) | – | ++ | |
| SCII | SCII – Curative room (D) | +++ | +++ |
| ST | ST – Preparation room (F) | – | +++ |
| ST – Storage room (F) | – | ++ |
Central filter (CF); diffuser (D); filter (F); flaps (Fp).
*Scores: without growth (–); 1–15 cysts and/or trophozoites (+); 16–30 (++) cysts and/or trophozoites and >30 cysts and/or trophozoites (+++). The assays were performed in triplicate; for each replicate, cysts and/or trophozoites were counted in five microscope fields (at 100×).
Discussion
Studies of FLA isolation in hospital environments are scarce, despite the importance of these microorganisms as potential causers of opportunistic infections and as vehicles and reservoirs of pathogens. Some reports of isolation of these amoebas in hospital environments have been described from water systems (Trabelsi et al., 2016; Muchesa et al., 2017), dust and biofilm (Silva and Rosa, 2003; Carlesso et al., 2010; Costa et al., 2010). Reports of FLA isolation from air conditioners have been described in some countries such as Chile (Astorga et al., 2011) and Malaysia (Chan et al., 2011), however, in hospital environments the presence of these amoebae in air conditioners is still poorly investigated. In the present study, a high culture rate of FLA was observed, being higher than 70%, indicating the high prevalence of these amoebae in air conditioning units in the investigated hospital.
All isolates were characterized as belonging to the genus Acanthamoeba. The morphological identification of the isolates of the present study showed the presence of double-walled cysts with characteristics compatible with group II and III. The morphological group II harbours Acanthamoeba species commonly isolated from environmental and clinical samples, described as responsible for most cases infection in humans, such as amoebic keratitis and GAE (Walochnik et al., 2000).
Currently molecular methods for the detection of Acanthamoeba spp. are being increasingly used due to the high sensitivity and specificity of these methods (Visvesvara et al., 2007). The PCR using primers that amplify a conserved region of the 18S rDNA gene is the most used, since the sequencing of the fragment obtained in the PCR allows the determination of the genotype (Fuerst et al., 2015). The three genotypes of Acanthamoeba spp. identified in this study (T4, T5 and T11) have a wide environmental distribution, being reported the isolation of these from samples from water (Sente et al., 2016), soil (Todd et al., 2015) and dust (Niyyati et al., 2009). The prevalence of the T4 genotype in environmental samples, reported in other studies (Geisen et al., 2014). Rahdar et al. (2012) verified the predominance of this genotype in isolates obtained from soil and water from a province of Iran. Similarly, Geisen et al. (2014) reported the predominance of the T4 genotype in Acanthamoeba isolates from soil samples from three distinct locations, the Netherlands, Sardinia and Tibet. This is the genotype most associated with cases of keratitis and amoebic encephalitis, as well as other opportunistic infections caused by this protozoan (Siddiqui and Khan, 2012).
The T5 genotype was the second most found. In the study by Booton et al. (2005), which included 200 isolates of Acanthamoeba, this genotype was identified as the second most prevalent among environmental isolates, as well as second in the study by Ledee et al. (2009) that included isolates of amoebic keratitis. The T5 genotype is associated with cases of amoebic keratitis and encephalitis (Siddiqui and Khan, 2012).
Some studies relate the T11 genotype to cases of amoebic keratitis (Hajialilo et al., 2016; Jercic et al., 2019). This was one of the genotypes described as causing this infection in a large research carried out in Austria that included cases of Acanthamoeba infections in the last 20 years (Walochnik et al., 2015).
Studies that evaluated the presence of Acanthamoeba in dust and soil samples showed similar results to the present study, reporting the presence of T4, T5 and T11 genotypes, with T4 genotype predominating (Niyyati et al., 2009; Todd et al., 2015). Acanthamoeba isolation studies from air conditioners have been performed in some countries such as Chile (Astorga et al., 2011) and Malaysia (Chan et al., 2011), showing the presence of T3, T4, T5 and T11.
There are few reports of isolation of Acanthamoeba in hospital settings, despite the importance of these microorganisms as causing opportunistic infections, as well as vehicles and pathogen dispersers (Kocazeybek, 2015). Carlesso et al. (2010) described the presence of T4 genotype Acanthamoeba in dust samples and T5 genotype in biofilm samples, both from a hospital environment in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. An investigation conducted in Austria for the presence of AVL and bacteria in refrigeration systems following a legionellosis outbreak in and around a hospital reported the presence of nine Acanthamoeba isolates belonging to the T4 genotype, which had amoeba resistant bacteria in its interior, emphasizing the importance of these amoebas as bacterial vehicles (Scheikl et al., 2016).
All genotypes identified in our study are associated with cases of human infections (Siddiqui and Khan, 2012; Jercic et al., 2019). These results deserve special attention from the hospital community, considering the isolation environment, the characteristic of many patients in a hospital environment, as they may be immunologically susceptible to infections, as well as the opportunistic nature of Acanthamoeba spp. However, further sequencing is required to obtain a better understanding of the spread of amoebae throughout the studied hospital.
Several authors report that osmo and thermotolerance assays can determine the pathogenicity of an Acanthamoeba isolate, since isolates capable of adapting physiologically and resisting to adverse conditions, such as growth in hyperosmolar medium and at elevated temperatures, are more adapted and can cause infections in the man and animals (Khan et al., 2002).
In this study, pathogenic isolates and with low pathogenic potential were obtained from hospital settings, such as EM room, OSC, SC and surgical clinic, which are environments where patients with severe health conditions and those susceptible to opportunistic infections are found. Although most of the isolates were not classified as pathogenic, they still have significant epidemiological importance, since they can serve as vehicles and reservoirs of pathogenic microorganisms in health service settings.
Financial support
This study was supported by grants from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical standards
Not applicable.
References
- Afonso MSM, Tripple AFV, Souza ACS, Prado MA and Anders PS (2004) A qualidade do ar em ambientes hospitalares climatizados e sua influência na ocorrência de infecções. Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem 6, 181–188. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Herrawy A, Bahgat M, Mohammed A, Ashour A and Hikal W (2013) Morpho-physiological and biochemical criteria of Acanthamoeba spp. isolated from the Egyptian aquatic environment. Iranian Journal of Parasitology 8, 302–312. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alves DSMM, Moraes AS, Nitz N, Oliveira MGC, Hecht MM, Gurguel-Gonçalves R and Cuba CAC (2012) Occurrence and characterization of Acanthamoeba similar to genotypes T4, T5, and T2/T6 isolated from environmental sources in Brasília, Federal District, Brazil. Experimental Parasitology 131, 239–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Astorga B, Lorenzo-Morales J, Martín-Navarro CM, Alarcón V, Moreno J, González AC, Navarrete E, Piñero JE and Valladares B (2011) Acanthamoeba belonging to T3, T4, and T11: genotypes isolated from air-conditioning units in Santiago, Chile. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 58, 542–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balczun C and Scheid PL (2017) Free-living amoebae as hosts for and vectors of intracellular microorganisms with public health significance. Viruses 9, 1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Booton GC, Visvesvara GS, Byers TJ, Kelly DJ and Fuerst PA (2005) Identification and distribution of Acanthamoeba species genotypes associated with nonkeratitis infections. Journal of clinical microbiology 43, 1689–1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carlesso AM, Artuso GL, Caumo K and Rott MB (2010) Potentially pathogenic Acanthamoeba isolated from a hospital in Brazil. Current Microbiology 60, 185–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caumo K, Frasson AP, Pens CJ, Panatieri LF, Frazzon APG and Rott MB (2009) Potentially pathogenic Acanthamoeba in swimming pools: a survey in the southern Brazilian city of Porto Alegre. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology 103, 477–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chan LL, Mak JW, Low YT, Koh TT, Ithoib I and Mohamed SM (2011) Isolation and characterization of Acanthamoeba spp. from air-conditioners in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Acta Tropica 117, 23–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corsaro D, Walochnik J, Köhsler M and Rott MB (2015) Acanthamoeba misidentification and multiple labels: redefining genotypes T16, T19, and T20 and proposal for Acanthamoeba micheli sp. nov. (genotype T19). Parasitology Research 114, 2481–2490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corsaro D, Köhsler M, Di Filippo MM, Venditti D, Monno R, Di Cave D, Berilli F and Walochnik J (2017) Update on Acanthamoeba jacobsi genotype T15, including full-length 18S rDNA molecular phylogeny. Parasitology Research 116, 1273–1284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costa AO, Castro EA, Ferreira GA, Furst C, Crozeta MA and Thomaz-Soccol V (2010) Characterization of Acanthamoeba isolates from dust of a public hospital in curitiba, paraná, Brazil. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 57, 70–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuerst PA, Booton GC and Crary M (2015) Phylogenetic analysis and the evolution of the 18S rRNA gene typing system of Acanthamoeba. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 62, 69–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geisen S, Fiore-Donno AM, Walochnik J and Bonkowski M (2014) Acanthamoeba everywhere: high diversity of Acanthamoeba in soils. Parasitology Research 113, 3151–3158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graudenz GS and Dantas E (2007) Poluição dos ambientes interiores: doenças e sintomas relacionados às edificações. Revista Brasileira de Medicina 2, 23–31. [Google Scholar]
- Hajialilo E, Behnia M, Tarighi F, Niyyati M and Rezaeian M (2016) Isolation and genotyping of Acanthamoeba strains (T4, T9, and T11) from amoebic keratitis patients in Iran. Parasitology Research 115, 3147–3151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jercic MI, Aguayo C, Saldarriaga-Córdoba M, Muiño L, Chenet SM, Lagos J, Osuna A and Fernández J (2019) Genotypic diversity of Acanthamoeba strains isolated from Chilean patients with Acanthamoeba keratitis. Parasites & vectors 12, 58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khan NA, Jarroll EL and Paget TA (2002) Molecular and physiological differentiation between pathogenic and non-pathogenic Acanthamoeba. Current Microbiology 45, 197–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kocazeybek B (2015) Free living amoebae: Acanthamoeba species pose a great risk for human health. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 33, 349–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C and Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35, 1547–1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ledee DR, Iovieno A, Miller D, Mandal N, Diaz M, Fell J, Fine ME and Alfonso EC (2009) Molecular identification of T4 and T5 genotypes in isolates from Acanthamoeba keratitis patients. Journal of clinical microbiology 47, 1458–1462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leung M and Chan AHS (2006) Control and management of hospital indoor air quality. Medical Science Monitor 12, 17–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marciano-Cabral F, Jamerson M and Kaneshiro ES (2010) Free-living amoebae, Legionella and Mycobacterium in tap water supplied by a municipal drinking water utility in the USA. Journal of Water and Health 8, 71–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maschio VJ, Corção G and Rott MB (2015) Identification of Pseudomonas spp. as amoeba-resistant microorganisms in isolates of Acanthamoeba. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo 57, 81–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muchesa P, Leifels M, Jurzik L, Hoorzook KB, Barnard TG and Bartie C (2017) Coexistence of free-living amoebae and bacteria in selected South African hospital water distribution systems. Parasitology Research 116, 155–165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niyyati M, Lorenzo-Morales J, Rahimic F, Motevalli-Haghia A, Martín-Navarro CM, Farnia S, Valladares B and Rezaeian M (2009) Isolation and genotyping of potentially pathogenic Acanthamoeba strains from dust sources in Iran. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 425–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ooi SS, Mak JW, Chen DKF and Ambu S (2017) The correlation of Acanthamoeba from the ventilation system with other environmental parameters in commercial buildings as possible indicator for indoor air quality. Industrial Health 55, 35–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Page FC (1988) A new key to Freshwater and Soil Gymnamoebae. Ambleside, Cumbria, UK: Freshwater Biological Association. [Google Scholar]
- Pussard M and Pons R (1977) Morphologies de la paroi kystique et taxonomie du genre Acanthamoeba (Protozoa. Amoebida). Protistologica 13, 557–610. [Google Scholar]
- Rahdar M, Niyyati M, Salehi M, Feghhi M, Makvandi M, Pourmehdi M and Farnia S (2012) Isolation and genotyping of Acanthamoeba strains from environmental sources in Ahvaz city, Khuzestan province, southern Iran. Iranian Journal of Parasitology 7, 22–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ross C, Menezes JR, Svidzinski TIE, Albino U and Andrade G (2004) Studies on fungal and bacterial population of air-conditioned environments. Brazilian Archives Biology Technology 47, 827–835. [Google Scholar]
- Santana WO and Fortuna JL (2012) Microbiota de aparelhos de ar condicionado das áreas críticas de hospitais públicos e particulares e sua relação com as infecções hospitalares. Revista Biociências 18, 56–64. [Google Scholar]
- Scheikl U, Tsao HF and Horn M (2016) Free-living amoebae and their associated bacteria in Austrian cooling towers: a 1-year routine screening. Parasitology Research 115, 3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schroeder JM, Booton G, Hay J, Niszl IA, Seal DV, Markus MB, Fuerst PA and Byers TJ (2001) Use of subgenic 18S ribosomal DNA PCR and sequencing for genus and genotype identification of Acanthamoeba from humans with keratitis and from sewage sludge. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 39, 1903–1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sente C, Erume J, Naigaga I, Magambo PK, Ochwo S, Mulindwa J, Namara BG, Kato CD, Sebyatika G, Muwonge K and Ocaido M (2016) Occurrence and genetic characterisation of Acanthamoeba spp. from environmental and domestic water sources in Queen Elizabeth Protected Area, Uganda. Parasites & Vectors 9, 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siddiqui R and Khan NA (2012) Biology and pathogeneses of Acanthamoeba. Parasites and Vectors 5, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silva MA and Rosa JA (2003) Isolamento de amebas de vida livre potencialmente patogênicas em poeira de hospitais. Revista de Saúde Pública 37, 242–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silva DP, Nazaré DL, Muniz JWC and Câmara CNS (2013) Infecções hospitalares associadas à qualidade do ar em ambientes climatizados. Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção 3, 153–157. [Google Scholar]
- Todd CD, Reyes-Batlle M, Martín-Navarro CM, Dorta-Gorrín A, Lopez-Arencibia A, Martínez-Carretero E, Piñero JE, Valladares B, Lindo JF and Lorenzo-Morales J (2015) Isolation and genotyping of Acanthamoeba strains from soil sources from Jamaica, West Indies. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 62, 416–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trabelsi H, Dendana F, Sellami A, Sellami H, Cheikhrouhou F, Neji S, Makni F and Ayadi A (2012) Pathogenic free-living amoebae: epidemiology and clinical review. Pathologie Biologie 60, 399–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trabelsi H, Dendana F, Neji S, Sellami H, Cheikhrouhou F, Makni F and Ayadi A (2016) Morphological and molecular identification of free living amoeba isolated from hospital water in Tunisia. Parasitology Research 115, 431–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Visvesvara GS (2013) Infections with free-living amebae. In Tanowitz HBG and Brutto OHD (eds), Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Atlanta, USA: Elsevier, pp. 153–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Visvesvara GS, Moura H and Schuster FL (2007) Pathogenic and opportunistic free-living amoebae: Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, Naegleria fowleri, and Sappinia diploidea. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 50, 1–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walochnik J, Obwaller A and Aspöck H (2000) Correlations between morphological, molecular biological and physiological characteristics in clinical and nonclinical isolates of Acanthamoeba spp. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66, 4408–4413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walochnik J, Scheikl U and Haller-Schober EM (2015) Twenty years of Acanthamoeba diagnostics in Austria. The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology 62, 3–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]