Abstract
In the Guillain-Barré syndrome clinical deficit is caused by failure of conduction in nerve fibres. Immunological mechanisms are generally held responsible, but the mechanism has not yet been elucidated. A recent longitudinal analysis of the distribution of lesions along the nerve trunks suggested two main patterns. In one of them, motor conduction block dispersed over the length of the nerve trunk was found, whereas sensory fibres were usually spared. For further pathogenetic studies of this subgroup, it is important to know whether conduction block occurs randomly or at preferred sites. As a tool to establish this, a model for conduction block is presented, based on a random distribution of lesions in the peripheral nerves. It is applicable to compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) obtained in routine EMG studies. Comparison of predicted and measured CMAPs in a first group of seven Guillain-Barré patients with evidence of conduction block supports the concept of a random distribution of lesions in this subgroup.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Albers J. W., Donofrio P. D., McGonagle T. K. Sequential electrodiagnostic abnormalities in acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 1985 Jul-Aug;8(6):528–539. doi: 10.1002/mus.880080609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown W. F., Feasby T. E. Conduction block and denervation in Guillain-Barré polyneuropathy. Brain. 1984 Mar;107(Pt 1):219–239. doi: 10.1093/brain/107.1.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dumas M., Schwab M. E., Thoenen H. Retrograde axonal transport of specific macromolecules as a tool for characterizing nerve terminal membranes. J Neurobiol. 1979 Mar;10(2):179–197. doi: 10.1002/neu.480100207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee R. G., Ashby P., White D. G., Aguayo A. J. Analysis of motor conduction velocity in the human median nerve by computer simulation of compound muscle action potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1975 Sep;39(3):225–237. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90144-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mills K. R., Murray N. M. Proximal conduction block in early Guillain-Barré syndrome. Lancet. 1985 Sep 21;2(8456):659–659. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sumner A. J. The physiological basis for symptoms in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1981;9 (Suppl):28–30. doi: 10.1002/ana.410090706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waxman S. G., Brill M. H., Geschwind N., Sabin T. D., Lettvin J. Y. Probability of conduction deficit as related to fiber length in random-distribution models of peripheral neuropathies. J Neurol Sci. 1976 Sep;29(1):39–53. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(76)90079-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wexler I. Sequence of demyelination-remyelination in Guillain-Barré disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983 Feb;46(2):168–174. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.46.2.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Meché F. G., Meulstee J., Vermeulen M., Kievit A. Patterns of conduction failure in the Guillain-Barré syndrome. Brain. 1988 Apr;111(Pt 2):405–416. doi: 10.1093/brain/111.2.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Meché F. G., Meulster J., Kleijweg R. P. Conduction block in acute inflammatory polyneuropathy. Lancet. 1985 Dec 7;2(8467):1302–1303. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91583-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]