Skip to main content
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1988 May;51(5):684–687. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.5.684

The optimal recording electrode configuration for compound sensory action potentials.

E Eduardo 1, D Burke 1
PMCID: PMC1033077  PMID: 2841424

Abstract

There is no uniformity in the published literature from different laboratories on the optimal electrode configuration for recording nerve action potentials, and a number of standard texts omit any reference to the effects that interelectrode distance and electrode orientation can have on the shape, amplitude and latency of nerve action potentials. The sensory action potential from the digital nerves of the index finger was recorded at wrist and elbow using bipolar electrodes with the "active" electrode over the median nerve and the "reference" placed 4 cm laterally or proximally along the nerve using interelectrode distances of 4, 3 and 2 cm. These potentials were compared with that recorded using a remote reference on the ipsilateral shoulder, the assumption being that this configuration eliminated the contribution of the reference electrode to the compound nerve action potential. With different electrode configurations, there were significant differences in the shape of the potential, the latencies to onset and peak and the rising- and falling-phase amplitudes. The shorter the distance between the electrodes the greater the distortions. Overall, the distortions were least with the 4 cm interelectrode separation, particularly for short conduction distances.

Full text

PDF
684

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen K. Surface recording of orthodromic sensory nerve action potentials in median and ulnar nerves in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve. 1985 Jun;8(5):402–408. doi: 10.1002/mus.880080509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chodoroff G., Tashjian E. A., Ellenberg M. R. Orthodromic vs antidromic sensory nerve latencies in healthy persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985 Sep;66(9):589–591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frith R. W., Benstead T. J., Daube J. R. Stationary waves recorded at the shoulder after median nerve stimulation. Neurology. 1986 Nov;36(11):1458–1464. doi: 10.1212/wnl.36.11.1458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GILLIATT R. W., MELVILLE I. D., VELATE A. S., WILLISON R. G. A STUDY OF NORMAL NERVE ACTION POTENTIALS USING AN AVERAGING TECHNIQUE (BARRIER GRID STORAGE TUBE). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1965 Jun;28:191–200. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.28.3.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grotz R. C., Long C., 2nd A system for review of findings on muscle biopsy--a teaching aid. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1966 Feb;47(2):51–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Iyer K. S., Kaplan E., Goodgold J. Sensory nerve action potentials of the medial and lateral plantar nerve. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984 Sep;65(9):529–530. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kimura J., Ishida T., Suzuki S., Kudo Y., Matsuoka H., Yamada T. Far-field recording of the junctional potential generated by median nerve volleys at the wrist. Neurology. 1986 Nov;36(11):1451–1457. doi: 10.1212/wnl.36.11.1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimura J., Machida M., Ishida T., Yamada T., Rodnitzky R. L., Kudo Y., Suzuki S. Relation between size of compound sensory or muscle action potentials, and length of nerve segment. Neurology. 1986 May;36(5):647–652. doi: 10.1212/wnl.36.5.647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kimura J., Mitsudome A., Yamada T., Dickins Q. S. Stationary peaks from a moving source in far-field recording. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984 Oct;58(4):351–361. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(84)90061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Levin K. H., Stevens J. C., Daube J. R. Superficial peroneal nerve conduction studies for electromyographic diagnosis. Muscle Nerve. 1986 May;9(4):322–326. doi: 10.1002/mus.880090407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murai Y., Sanderson I. Studies of sensory conductions. Comparison of latencies of orthodromic and antidromic sensory potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975 Dec;38(12):1187–1189. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.38.12.1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Varghese G., Rogoff J. B. Influence of inter-electrode distance on antidromic sensory potentials. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983 May-Jun;23(4):297–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Walsh J. C., McLeod J. G. Alcoholic neuropathy. An electrophysiological and histological study. J Neurol Sci. 1970 May;10(5):457–469. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(70)90025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Walsh J. C., Yiannikas C., McLeod J. G. Abnormalities of proximal conduction in acute idiopathic polyneuritis: comparison of short latency evoked potentials and F-waves. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 Feb;47(2):197–200. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.2.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES